Calculus Problem Solution and Simulation Using Gui of Matlab PDF
Calculus Problem Solution and Simulation Using Gui of Matlab PDF
Abstract: This research aims to develop the project application in teaching and learning Calculus using Grapichal User Interface (GUI) of Matlab. The
scope of the development result includes (1) PreCalculus, (2) Function Limit, (3) Derivative and its application, and (4) Integral and its application. Every
aspect of development is presented according to the standards of material competence, learning achievement indicators, and solutions or settlement
steps on each issue presented. This project application can be used by lecturers and students in universities to improve motivation, mastery of material
and student learning outcomes in the Calculus course. Development of this project application is done through 4 stages called 4-D namely: Define,
Design, Development, and Dissemination. Based on the data analysis, the results obtained at the validation stage of expert validity level average of
3.575, which means "quite valid". Then on a limited trial the average student gave a response of 92.00% which means "very good". While in the first field
trial the average student gave a response of 89.30% which means "very good", and in the second field trial the average student gave a responded of
90.15% which means "very good". Besides that, we also solve computational calculus problems in Edwin J. Purcell Dale Varberg's Book of Volume 1 of
Edition 5 of 48 questions that are divided into 64 cases.
branching structure like: if then else, and case of. Looping 4. Dissemination. The last stage is the distribution of product
structure is generally used for graph-based simulation-based development to the general audience, especially lecturers
application development while branching structures are used and students of the early semester who are taking
to solve optimization cases. The attributes used are tailored to Calculus courses to be used as media and tools in order
the built application, there are seven attributes that are often to improve understanding and learning outcomes.
used in application development besides toolbar as additional
settings and attributes when running. But in this study not all
attributes are used. The attributes used in the development of
this application that is EditText, StatisText, PushButton, Table,
Axes, Panel, and BtnGroup. While the usefulness of each
attribute is described in Table 1 below.
276
IJSTR©2017
www.ijstr.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 6, ISSUE 09, SEPTEMBER 2017 ISSN 2277-8616
n
4.2 Result of Limited and Field Trials
V i
R
i 1
… (1) Result of Limited Trials
n After the revision according to the instructions or input from the
1. Determine the degree of validity based on the conversion expert, then obtained the design or Prototype 2 for later
of the average values obtained with the validity level conducted a limited trial. Limited trials were conducted on 5
interval as shown in Table 3 below: students. The results of the limited trial are according to Table
5 below.
TABEL 3: INTERVALS OF VALIDITY VALUE
TABLE 5: RESULT OF LIMITED TRIALS
Intervals Level of Validity
Respondents
Variables Average
R=5 Very valid 1 2 3 4 5
4≤R<5 Valid Average 4.25 4.65 4.60 4.70 4.80 4.60
Percentage 85.0 93.0 92.0 94.0 96.0 92.0
3≤R<4 Quite valid
2≤R<3 Less valid
Based on the calculation of Table 5 above, the average
1≤R<2 Invalid
student gave a response of 92.00% which means the
application being developed is categorized "very good".
2. Declare a product that meets the validity criteria, if the However, based on the results of questionnaires from
minimum validity level achieved is quite valid. Then the
respondents there are still some shortcomings such as the
product continued to be used or used in limited trials and sentence part of the solution case, the suitability of the use of
field trials. images, clarity and language communication used, the
suitability of the selection of the size and typeface. Some
Technical Analysis of Product Trials sections are revised in Prototype 2 such as (1) improvements
Data of student response result through questionnaire in size and typeface, (2) Simulation size (graph) is maximal,
collected, then tabulated. The result of tabulation of each and (3) Sub menu is adjusted indicator of learning
response is calculated for percentage, by formula [9]: achievement.
Score Per Item … (2)
Percentage (P) Maximum Score
100 % Result of Field Trials
After conducting a limited trial, then some revision of the
advice of the students (respondents) in the limited trial stage
TABLE 4: CATEGORY INTERVALS OF APPLICATION so that obtained Prototype 3 which is then used for field trials.
Field trials were conducted twice, with 20 respondents
Percentage (%) Categories (students) each trial. In the first field test, the respondent gave
P 20 Not Good an additional assessment on the aspect of the speed of the
20 P < 40 Less Good button reaction, this is because the file size is too large and
40 P < 60 Pretty Good the number of attributes used so that it is rather slow in
60 P < 80 Good displaying the output both the completion step and simulation
P 80 Very Good graph. In addition, there is also the use of less communicative
language, the suitability of the selection of the size and type of
letters, the layout of text and images, the suitability of GUI
4 DEVELOPMENT RESULT background selection, and there are words / sentences that
have not match the performance indicators. The results of field
4.1 Result of Expert Validation trials are as in Figure 3 and Figure 4 below.
Expert validation is performed after initial design or Prototype
1 is completed. Expert validation is performed to ask for
advice or input related to 3 aspects, there are content (outline
of material), programming, and display. At this stage, the
expert team places more emphasis on visualization of the
applications being built, such as the suitability of colors in each
component with the background of each GUI, the breadth of
performance indicators, the compatibility and consistency of
the button display, and the memory capacity of the files for
easy distribution. Based on the validation results obtained the
average expert assessment is 3.575 which means "quite
valid". From the results of this validation then proceeded to a
limited trial and field trials. Some revisions in this stage such
as (1) the position of some buttons is set well, (2) maximize
tools have been activated, (3) sub menu hints and Fig. 3 Result of First Field Trials
programmer and some simulation picture have been
completed. Based on the data calculation in Figure 3 above, the average
student gaves a response of 89.3% which means the
application being developed is categorized "very good".
277
IJSTR©2017
www.ijstr.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 6, ISSUE 09, SEPTEMBER 2017 ISSN 2277-8616
278
IJSTR©2017
www.ijstr.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 6, ISSUE 09, SEPTEMBER 2017 ISSN 2277-8616
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The research team would like to thank the manager of
Mathematics Laboratory FKIP UM Mataram and FITK UIN
Mataram who have given permission to conduct field trials.
REFERENCES
[1] A. F. M. Ayub, “Teaching and Learning Calculus Using
Computer”, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, pp. 1-11,
September 2015.
279
IJSTR©2017
www.ijstr.org