Homework Chapter 9: More On Specification and Data Issues: Econ 30331: Econometrics Prof. Byung-Joo Lee
Homework Chapter 9: More On Specification and Data Issues: Econ 30331: Econometrics Prof. Byung-Joo Lee
Issues
Econ 30331: Econometrics Prof. Byung-Joo Lee
with R2 = .353 (n = 177). When ceoten2 and comten2 are added, R2 = .375. Is
there evidence of functional form misspecification in this model?
2. Let math10 denote the percentage of students at a Michigan high school receiving a
passing score on a standardized math test (see also Example4.2). We are interested
in estimating the effect of per student spending on math performance. A simple
model is
Explain why the effect of expenditures on math10 is lower in column (2) than
in column (1). Is the effect in column (2) still statistically greater than zero?
(c) Does it appear that pass rates are lower at larger schools, other factors being
equal? Explain.
(d) Interpret the coefficient on lnchprg in column (2).
(e) What do you make of the substantial increase in R2 from column (1) to
column (2)?
15
3. Use CEOSAL1.dta to estimate the following CEO salary equation:
where rosneg is a dummy variable equal to one if ros < 0 and equal to zero if
ros ≥ 0. Generate dummy variable rosneg using Stata command gene rosneg =
(ros < 0). Apply RESET test by adding ŷ 2 and ŷ 3 to the above regression equation
to test the functional form misspecification of the original regression equation.
(a) Use the variable KW W (the "knowledge of the world of work" test score) as
a proxy for ability in place of IQ. What is the estimated return to education
in this case?
(b) Now, use IQ and KW W together as proxy variables. What happens to the
estimated return to education?
(c) In part (b), are IQ and KW W individuall significant? Are they jointly
significant?
16