NIH Public Access: Author Manuscript
NIH Public Access: Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
J Pharm Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 1.
Published in final edited form as:
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Abstract
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Keywords
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
DNA delivery; gene delivery; gene vectors; lipoplexes; cationic lipids; peptides
INTRODUCTION
Lipoplexes have been used extensively for in vitro and in vivo gene delivery applications, and
are currently in clinical trials. Lipid-based vectors condense DNA and protect it from
degradation, promote membrane interaction and destabilize endosomes, and can have low
toxicity.1-5 Despite their widespread use, the efficiency of lipid-mediated gene transfection
still lags behind that of viral vectors. Lipoplex stability, cellular internalization, and
intracellular trafficking barriers can limit the efficacy of lipoplexes.6-8 Efforts to improve
lipid-based gene delivery have focused on modifying the cationic lipid structure, altering lipid
formulations, and adding polymers to lipid-DNA complexes to enhance transfection.9-15 In
particular, polymers or peptides with specific functionalities may be added to lipids to function
Correspondence to: Lonnie D. Shea (Telephone: 847−491−7043; Fax: 847−491−3728; E-mail: [email protected]).
REA et al. Page 2
as modular units that can target a range of cellular processes.16 For example, bioactive peptides
for receptor targeting, endosomal destabilization, and nuclear localization have been utilized
to enhance lipofection.17-27
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
We hypothesize that the physical properties of the lipoplex as well as the surface characteristics,
such as the density of surface-displayed amines, may be dependent on the amount of peptide
added to the lipoplexes and may affect transfection efficiency. Peptide-lipoplexes were formed
at peptide/DNA weight ratios ranging from 0 to 120 by adding cationic peptides to DNA prior
to complexation with lipids. The physiochemical properties of lipoplexes were characterized
by gel retardation, average diameter, zeta potential, lipid and peptide content, and the amount
of surface-displayed amines. Lipoplexes were visualized using fluorescence microscopy to
determine the extent of peptide and DNA colocalization within lipoplexes, and to determine
the extent of lipoplex localization to cells. In addition, the percentage of cells transfected,
protein expression and the quantity of DNA associated with cells were quantified. This report
investigates peptide addition as a simple method to manipulate the physical properties and
surface chemistry of lipoplexes, which can increase cellular association and transfection
efficiency. These studies add to the basic understanding of gene delivery and may contribute
to the design of modular gene delivery vectors.
Plasmids encoding for luciferase and enhanced green fluorescent fusion protein (pEGFP-Luc)
with a CMV promoter were purified from bacteria culture using Qiagen (Valencia, CA)
reagents and stored in Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). Lipofectamine,
Lipofectamine 2000, fluorescamine, Oregon Green dye, tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA), and
LysoTracker reagent were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Amino acids and resin
for peptide synthesis were purchased from Novabiochem (San Diego, CA). The remaining
peptide synthesis reagents were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). All
other reagents were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA) unless otherwise noted.
EKRGKVKPKG, a scrambled version of SV40, were synthesized using standard solid phase
methods and FastMocTM chemistry. The peptide was cleaved with a mixture of 90%
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 2.5% triisopropylsilane (TIS), 2.5% thioanosole, and 5% water for
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
1−2 h at room temperature, and then lyophilized. The crude peptide was analyzed for purity
by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). The peptides were
purified by preparative RP-HPLC with a gradient of 0−20% acetonitrile with 0.1% TFA in
water with 0.1% TFA. Peptide molecular weight was confirmed using electrospray ionization
(ESI) mass spectroscopy and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight
(MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry at Northwestern University's Analytical Services
Laboratory. Peptide purity was analyzed using analytical RP-HPLC and the purity of both
peptides was determined to be >95%.
Peptide-Lipoplex Formation
Lipofectamine (Invitrogen), a 3:1 (w/w) formulation of the polycationic lipid 2,3-dioleyloxy-
N-[2(sperminecarboxamido)ethyl]-N,N-dimethyl-1-propanaminium trifluoroacetate
(DOSPA) and the neutral lipid dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), was used at a 10:1
(w/w) ratio with DNA, within the manufacturer's recommended usage range. Peptide-
lipoplexes were formed by adding 22.5 μL of peptide solution containing varying amounts of
peptide to 22.5 μL DNA solution, and the resulting solution was then mixed by gentle pipetting.
The peptide/DNA mixture was allowed to incubate for 20 min at room temperature prior to
the dropwise addition of 45 μL of lipid solution. The resulting solution was mixed by gentle
pipetting and incubated for 20 min. Peptide-lipoplexes were formed in serum-free cell growth
media [Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), Invitrogen] at pH 7.4. For studies using
Lipofectamine 2000, the lipid formulation was used at a 1:3 ratio with DNA. Zeta potential
and z-average diameters were measured with a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern, Worcestershire,
UK). All peptide/DNA ratios reported herein are by weight; the conversion between peptide/
DNA (w/w) ratio and peptide/DNA N/P ratio is 1 (w/w) ratio to 1.46 N/P ratio.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Free peptide in the filtrate was measured by dialyzing the samples using a Spectrum Labs
(Rancho Dominguez, CA) dialysis membrane with 1000 MWCO, lyophilizing, and then taking
the absorbance of samples resuspended in water at 220 nm using a Cary 50 UV/Vis
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
spectrophotometer (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). A standard curve was prepared using known
amounts of peptide.
Madison, WI). Cells were lysed and assayed for enzymatic activity 48 h after transfection. The
luminometer was set for a 3 s delay with signal integration for 10 s. Luciferase activity was
normalized to the amount of total protein in the sample, which was measured using a BCA
assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL) following the manufacturer's instructions. Transfection by
surface-bound lipoplexes was performed to determine the effect of particle density on
transfection efficiency. For surface-mediated DNA delivery, complexes were formed in
unsupplemented DMEM as described above, then allowed to deposit onto 48-well tissue
culture polystyrene plates for 24 h, with plates being washed twice with unsupplemented
DMEM before the seeding of cells to remove unbound lipoplexes.
To determine if DNA and peptide colocalized, lipoplexes were formed with rhodamine-labeled
DNA and Oregon-Green-labeled peptides as described above. Complexes were immobilized
on tissue culture polystyrene (96-well plate; Corning, Corning, NY) immediately following
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
complex formation by incubation of DNA complexes (50 μL) with the substrate for 2 or 24 h
and were then visualized using fluorescence microscopy. To determine if DNA and peptide
colocalized with cells, lipoplexes were formed with rhodamine-labeled DNA or TAMRA-
labeled peptides. Lipoplexes were added to cells 24 h after cell seeding in 48-well plates. At
specified time points after transfection, cells were washed twice with PBS and then incubated
for 30 min with Lysotracker reagent. Cells and complexes were then visualized using
fluorescence microscopy at 2, 24, and 48 h.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Comparative analyses were completed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-tests, at a 95%
confidence level. Mean values with standard deviation are reported and all experiments were
performed in triplicate.
RESULTS
Physiochemical Properties of Peptide-Lipoplexes
Condensation of DNA by cationic peptides was investigated by gel retardation (Fig. 1). As the
weight ratio of peptide to DNA was increased from 10 to 120, DNA migration was increasingly
inhibited for both intact (SV40) and scrambled-sequence (sSV40) NLS peptides. However,
even at the highest peptide/DNA ratio of 120, the peptides did not completely inhibit DNA
migration. The intensity of each band was similar, indicating that complexation did not exclude
ethidium bromide intercalation. Incubation of the peptide/DNA complex with trypsin, which
degrades the peptide, allowed the DNA to migrate unhindered.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
The size and zeta potential of peptide-lipoplexes were dependent on peptide/DNA ratio. At
peptide/DNA ratios of 40 and below, the peptide-lipoplexes maintained an average diameter
of less than 500 nm for both the SV40 and the sSV40 peptides (Fig. 2A). For peptide/DNA
ratios of 60−100, the average diameter of the peptide-lipoplexes was greater than 500 nm,
increasing up to 1500 nm. Further increasing the peptide/DNA ratio above 108 resulted in a
decrease in the diameter of the lipoplexes to less than 500 nm. The trends observed with particle
size were comparable to zeta potential. At low and high peptide/DNA ratios (i.e., <60 and
>100), the zeta potential of the peptide-lipoplexes was positive, which is desirable for cell
membrane interactions, but at an intermediate peptide/DNA ratio between 60 and 100, the zeta
potential of the complexes was negative (Fig. 2B). Thus, although the peptides do not
completely condense DNA as seen by gel retardation, the peptides affect the size and zeta
potential of the lipoplexes.
Subsequent experiments were performed to determine if peptides were incorporated into the
lipoplexes at several peptide/DNA ratios. The fluorescence images support the size results
obtained by dynamic light scattering; lipoplexes formed without peptide (Fig. 3A) were
noticeably smaller than lipoplexes formed at a peptide/DNA ratio of 80 (Fig. 3B). Peptides
colocalized with DNA at both a peptide/DNA ratio of 80 (Fig. 3B) and 108 (Fig. 3C). Similar
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
fluorescence images were obtained for both the sSV40 peptide and the SV40 peptide (data not
shown).
Lipoplexes formed at peptide/DNA ratios of 108 and above significantly increased both the
percentage of transfected cells and reporter protein expression in NIH/3T3 mouse fibroblasts
compared to lower peptide/DNA ratios with both the SV40 peptide and the sSV40 peptide
(Fig. 5A and B). This trend was also observed with HEK293T human embryonic kidney cells
(data not shown). The addition of cationic peptide increased the percentage of transfected NIH/
3T3 cells up to 13-fold and protein expression 76-fold. Fluorescence microscopy experiments
using lipoplexes formed with TAMRA-labeled peptide and rhodamine-labeled DNA indicated
colocalization of peptide and DNA within cells (peptide/DNA, w/w, ratios of 20 and 100) at
2, 24, and 48 h (data not shown). For high peptide/DNA ratios, the transfection efficiency is
comparable to the transfection efficiency of using lipids alone with more than twice the amount
of DNA (Fig. 5C). For Lipofectamine 2000, the addition of peptide at a peptide/DNA ratio of
108 increased the percentage of transfected NIH/3T3 cells 1.9-fold and protein expression by
14.9-fold (data not shown). Although lipoplexes without any peptide or with small peptides
amounts demonstrated positive zeta potential and small particle size, they did not transfect as
well as the lipoplexes with peptide/DNA ratios of 108 and 120, which had similar physical
characteristics independent of sequence. Thus, the size and zeta potential of the complexes are
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
not the only factors that contribute to the increased transfection efficiency.
DISCUSSION
This report investigates transfection with peptide-lipoplexes formed at varying peptide/DNA
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
weight ratios and the influence of the peptides on the lipoplex's physical properties. At peptide/
DNA ratios below 60 or above 108, the average diameters of the complexes were less than 500
nm and the zeta potential was positive, while at peptide/DNA ratios between 60 and 100, the
average diameters of the complexes were greater than 500 nm, increasing to up to 1500 nm
with negative zeta potentials. Peptide-lipoplexes containing either intact or scrambled NLS
peptides at peptide/DNA ratios of 108 and above significantly increased both the percentage
of transfected cells and reporter protein expression compared to peptide/DNA ratios of 80 and
below, with increases up to 13-fold for percent transfection and 76-fold for luciferase
expression of NIH/3T3 cells. Comparable transfection efficiencies were achieved with less
than half the amount of DNA with peptide-lipoplexes compared to lipoplexes without peptide.
An increased cellular association of DNA was observed at peptide/DNA ratios above 108
compared to lower peptide/DNA ratios. In addition, inclusion of peptides in lipoplexes did not
increase cytotoxicity (data not shown), consistent with literature reports on low molecular
weight peptides relative to large proteins.35 Finally, the physical properties of the peptide-
lipoplexes and surface primary amines on the lipoplexes contributed to increased cellular
association and subsequent gene expression. The results obtained herein were similar with both
the SV40 and sSV40 peptides, indicating that sequence specificity was not responsible for the
observed results. The approach to form peptide-lipoplexes used herein is a more robust
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
DNA ratio of 80 have detectable amines on the surface, these lipoplexes still have a negative
zeta potential. Zeta potential does not indicate surface potential, but reflects the effective charge
of the particles compared to the bulk solution. Thus, although some peptide-lipoplexes have
detectable amines on the surface, the overall charge of the particle in solution may still be
negative, which was observed for the peptide-lipoplexes formed at a peptide/DNA ratio of 80.
The negative zeta potential and large particle diameter of the lipoplexes formed at a peptide/
DNA (w/w) ratio of 80 likely contribute to the relatively low transfection. Interestingly, the
addition of peptides prior to the addition of lipids did not prevent the peptides’ ability to be
displayed on the surface of the lipoplexes. In addition, the order of addition of the peptides and
lipids was critical to enhanced lipofection; lipid addition prior to peptides likely excludes the
small peptides from the lipoplex.
The increasing quantity of peptides within the lipoplexes increases the amount of accessible
amines, which is most likely from an increase in the amount of peptides on the lipoplex surface.
This increase of peptides on the lipoplex surface could facilitate cellular interactions. Cellular
association of DNA has been determined to be a rate-limiting step for lipofection.36 Size, zeta
potential, and density have also been implicated as important factors for cellular internalization
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
of lipoplexes;25-27 however, these factors cannot explain observations for transfection with
lipoplexes containing significant quantities of peptide, as size and zeta potential were similar
for low and high peptide amounts while transfection enhancement was only observed at high
peptide/DNA ratios. Thus, the increased quantity of cell-associated DNA reported herein is
due to both favorable lipoplex physical properties (i.e., small average diameter and positive
zeta potential) and an increased amount of peptides at the surface of the lipoplex, which could
promote cellular association.37 For liposomes modified by stearylated peptides, the peptide
density on the surface of the liposome dictated transfection behavior; higher densities of
peptides on the surface resulted in increase cellular uptake and protein expression.37 In the
study presented herein, the increase in cell-associated DNA was modest compared to the
increase in transfection efficiency at peptide/DNA (w/w) ratios above 80. Thus, the addition
of peptide may affect cellular processes other than increased association and uptake. For
example, the addition of peptides may protect the DNA from degradation or impart enhanced
intracellular trafficking due to changes in endocytic uptake. Note that polyplexes, such as PEI/
DNA complexes, are not limited by cellular association but by intracellular trafficking. The
SV40 and sSV40 peptides added in large quantities do not enhance PEI-mediated transfection
(data not shown), possibly because cell association is not the limiting step for PEI vectors.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Despite the inability to fully condense DNA, these cationic peptides contributed to the
physiochemical properties, cellular association, and transfection efficiency of the lipoplexes.
Complete condensation of DNA by peptides had been proposed as necessary for effective
transfection,27 and cationic peptides condense DNA efficiently with a minimum of eight or
more positively charged amino acids.30 However, the peptide sequences used here contained
five positively charged residues and were incorporated into the lipoplex. The colocalization of
the peptides with the DNA may allow for the peptides to protect the DNA from intracellular
degradation, despite the fact that the DNA was not fully condensed. In addition, the short
peptides may be beneficial to facilitate vector unpacking; “looser” particles may result in higher
transfection efficiencies than “tighter” particles.35,38,39 Shorter polycations can have a higher
probability of dissociating from DNA than longer polycations and lipids, as shown by a
thermodynamic model as well as experimentally, thus permitting higher expression rates in
vitro. Thus, complete precondensation by peptides prior to the addition of lipid is not necessary
for enhanced transfection, as shown in this report, and may in fact be detrimental to the efficient
release of DNA within the cell.
Both the scrambled and intact NLS sequences enhanced lipofection to a similar extent and
resulted in peptide-lipoplexes with comparable physiochemical properties. NLSs, such as the
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
minimal SV40 T-ag NLS, have previously been used to transfect cells in vitro,40 with several
studies indicating a specific enhancement due to peptide sequence, while others report that
peptide sequence has minimal effect. The results reported herein indicate that physiochemical
properties of the complexes at high peptide/DNA ratios, rather than sequence specificity, is
the main contributing factor of enhanced transfection with peptide-lipoplexes. Our results do
not preclude an effect due to the sequence. The peptide influences the physiochemical
properties of the peptide-modified lipoplexes to increase cellular internalization, which is
reportedly the rate-limiting step for lipoplexes. By overcoming cellular internalization, another
step in the transfection process (e.g., endosomal escape, vector unpacking) is now rate-limiting.
If the rate-limiting step is not nuclear localization, then an effect due to the peptide's nuclear
localization ability would not be observed.
CONCLUSION
This report describes enhancement of lipofection by the incorporation of peptides and indicates
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Support for this research was provided in part by the NIH [R01 EB003806-01 (AEB, LDS) and RO1 GM066830
(LDS)], the Institute for BioNanotechnology in Medicine (IBNAM) at Northwestern University, and a Ford Foundation
Predoctoral Fellowship (JCR). MALDI-TOF and ESI mass spectrometry were performed in the Analytical Services
Laboratory at Northwestern University. We would like to thank Zain Bengali, Angela Pannier, Tiffany Houchin-Ray,
Jaclyn Shepard, Nate Brown, Jill Millstone, Savka Stoeva, and Jae-Seung Lee for technical assistance.
REFERENCES
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
1. Felgner PL, Gadek TR, Holm M, Roman R, Chan HW, Wenz M, Northrop JP, Ringold GM, Danielsen
M. Lipofection—A highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 1987;84:7413–7417. [PubMed: 2823261]
2. Lasic DD, Templeton NS. Liposomes in gene therapy. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 1996;20:221–266.
3. Woodle MC, Scaria P. Cationic liposomes and nucleic acids. Curr Opin Colloid In 2001;6:78–84.
4. Templeton NS. Cationic liposome-mediated gene delivery in vivo. Biosci Rep 2002;22:283–295.
[PubMed: 12428905]
5. Wasungu L, Hoekstra D. Cationic lipids, lipoplexes and intracellular delivery of genes. J Control
Release 2006;116:255–264. [PubMed: 16914222]
6. Zabner J, Fasbender AJ, Moninger T, Poellinger KA, Welsh MJ. Cellular and molecular barriers to
gene-transfer by a cationic lipid. J Biol Chem 1995;270:18997–19007. [PubMed: 7642560]
7. Carriere M, Tranchant I, Niore PA, Byk G, Mignet N, Escriou V, Scherman D, Herscovici J.
Optimization of cationic lipid mediated gene transfer: Structure-function, physico-chemical, and
cellular studies. J Liposome Res 2002;12:95–106. [PubMed: 12604043]
8. Tranchant I, Thompson B, Nicolazzi C, Mignet N, Scherman D. Physicochemical optimisation of
plasmid delivery by cationic lipids. J Gene Med 2004;6:S24–S35. [PubMed: 14978748]
9. Felgner JH, Kumar R, Sridhar CN, Wheeler CJ, Tsai YJ, Border R, Ramsey P, Martin M, Felgner PL.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Enhanced gene delivery and mechanism studies with a novel series of cationic lipid formulations. J
Biol Chem 1994;269:2550–2561. [PubMed: 8300583]
10. Mack KD, Walzem RL, Lehmann-Bruinsma K, Powell JS, Zeldis JB. Polylysine enhances cationic
liposome-mediated transfection of the hepatoblastoma cell line Hep G2. Biotechnol Appl Biochem
1996;23:217–220. [PubMed: 8679107]
11. Sorgi FL, Bhattacharya S, Huang L. Protamine sulfate enhances lipid-mediated gene transfer. Gene
Ther 1997;4:961–968. [PubMed: 9349433]
12. Cheung CY, Murthy N, Stayton PS, Hoffman AS. A pH-sensitive polymer that enhances cationic
lipid-mediated gene transfer. Bioconjug Chem 2001;12:906–910. [PubMed: 11716680]
13. Wang L, MacDonald RC. New strategy for transfection: Mixtures of medium-chain and long-chain
cationic lipids synergistically enhance transfection. Gene Ther 2004;11:1358–1362. [PubMed:
15215886]
14. Koynova R, Wang L, Tarahovsky Y, MacDonald RC. Lipid phase control of DNA delivery. Bioconjug
Chem 2005;16:1335–1339. [PubMed: 16287225]
15. Narang AS, Thoma L, Miller DD, Mahato RL. Cationic lipids with increased DNA binding affinity
for nonviral gene transfer in dividing and nondividing cells. Bioconjug Chem 2005;16:156–168.
[PubMed: 15656587]
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
16. De Laporte L, Cruz Rea J, Shea LD. Design of modular non-viral gene therapy vectors. Biomaterials
2006;27:947–954. [PubMed: 16243391]
17. Ma H, Zhu J, Maronski M, Kotzbauer PT, Lee VMY, Dichter MA, Diamond SL. Non-classical nuclear
localization signal peptides for high efficiency lipofection of primary neurons and neuronal cell lines.
Neuroscience 2002;112:1–5. [PubMed: 12044466]
18. Simoes S, Slepushkin V, Gaspar R, de Lima MCP, Duzgunes N. Gene delivery by negatively charged
ternary complexes of DNA, cationic liposomes and transferrin or fusigenic peptides. Gene Ther
1998;5:955–964. [PubMed: 9813667]
19. Ou Z, Geiger T, Ou JS, Ackerman AW, Oldham KT, Pritchard KA. AP-4F, antennapedia peptide
linked to an amphipathic alpha helical peptide, increases the efficiency of lipofectamine-mediated
gene transfection in endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;305:605–610. [PubMed:
12763037]
20. White RE, Wade-Martins R, Hart SL, Frampton J, Huey B, Desai-Mehta A, Cerosaletti KM,
Concannon P, James MR. Functional delivery of large genomic DNA to human cells with a peptide-
lipid vector. J Gene Med 2003;5:883–892. [PubMed: 14533197]
21. Renigunta A, Krasteva G, Konig P, Rose F, Klepetko W, Grimminger F, Seeger W, Hanze J. DNA
transfer into human lung cells is improved with Tat-RGD peptide by caveoli-mediated endocytosis.
Bioconjug Chem 2006;17:327–334. [PubMed: 16536462]
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
22. Subramanian A, Ranganathan P, Diamond SL. Nuclear targeting peptide scaffolds for lipofection of
nondividing mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 1999;17:873–877. [PubMed: 10471928]
23. Aronsohn AI, Hughes JA. Nuclear localization signal peptides enhance cationic liposome-mediated
gene therapy. J Drug Target 1997;5:163–169. [PubMed: 9606006]
24. Ritter W, Plank C, Lausier J, Rudolph C, Zink D, Reinhardt D, Rosenecker J. A novel transfecting
peptide comprising a tetrameric nuclear localization sequence. J Mol Med 2003;81:708–717.
[PubMed: 14574456]
25. Schwartz B, Ivanov MA, Pitard B, Escriou V, Rangara R, Byk G, Wils P, Crouzet J, Scherman D.
Synthetic DNA-compacting peptides derived from human sequence enhance cationic lipid-mediated
gene transfer in vitro and in vivo. Gene Ther 1999;6:282–292. [PubMed: 10435113]
26. Murray KD, Etheridge CJ, Shah SI, Matthews DA, Russell W, Gurling HMD, Miller AD. Enhanced
cationic liposome-mediated transfection using the DNA-binding peptide mu (mu) from the
adenovirus core. Gene Ther 2001;8:453–460. [PubMed: 11313824]
27. Bremner KH, Seymour LW, Logan A, Read ML. Factors influencing the ability of nuclear localization
sequence peptides to enhance nonviral gene delivery. Bioconjug Chem 2004;15:152–161. [PubMed:
14733595]
28. Tagawa T, Manvell M, Brown N, Keller M, Perouzel E, Murray KD, Harbottle RP, Tecle M, Booy
F, Brahimi-Horn MC, Coutelle C, Lemoine NR, Alton EWFW, Miller AD. Characterisation of LMD
virus-like nanoparticles self-assembled from cationic liposomes, adenovirus core peptide mu (mu)
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
34. Bengali Z, Pannier AK, Segura T, Anderson BC, Jang JH, Mustoe TA, Shea LD. Gene delivery
through cell culture substrate adsorbed DNA complexes. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005;90:290–302.
[PubMed: 15800863]
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
35. Vaysse L, Arveiler B. Transfection using synthetic peptides: Comparison of three DNA-compacting
peptides and effect of centrifugation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000;1474:244–250. [PubMed:
10742605]
36. Varga CM, Tedford NC, Thomas M, Klibanov AM, Griffith LG, Lauffenburger DA. Quantitative
comparison of polyethylenimine formulations and adenoviral vectors in terms of intracellular gene
delivery processes. Gene Ther 2005;12:1023–1032. [PubMed: 15815703]
37. Khalil IA, Kogure K, Futaki S, Harashima H. High density of octaarginine stimulates
macropinocytosis leading to efficient intracellular trafficking for gene expression. J Biol Chem
2006;281:3544–3551. [PubMed: 16326716]
38. Schaffer DV, Fidelman NA, Dan N, Lauffenburger DA. Vector unpacking as a potential barrier for
receptor-mediated polyplex gene delivery. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000;67:598–606. [PubMed:
10649234]
39. Akita H, Tanimoto M, Masuda T, Kogure K, Hama S, Ninomiya K, Futaki S, Harashima H. Evaluation
of the nuclear delivery and intra-nuclear transcription of plasmid DNA condensed with micro (mu)
and NLS-micro by cytoplasmic and nuclear microinjection: A comparative study with poly-L-lysine.
J Gene Med 2006;8:198–206. [PubMed: 16285003]
40. Dean DA, Strong DD, Zimmer WE. Nuclear entry of nonviral vectors. Gene Ther 2005;12:881–890.
[PubMed: 15908994]
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 1.
Electrophoretic mobility of DNA with SV40 peptide (A) and sSV40 peptide (B). Lane
assignments correspond to peptide/DNA weight ratios. The last lane (labeled trp) corresponds
to complexes formed at a peptide/DNA ratio of 120 that were incubated with trypsin.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 2.
Average diameter (A) and zeta potential (B) of peptide-lipoplexes formed with SV40 and
sSV40 peptides. All values are reported as mean±standard deviation.
Figure 3.
Fluorescence microscopy images of peptide-lipoplexes. Rhodamine-labeled DNA was mixed
with Oregon Green-labeled sSV40 peptide and subsequently mixed with Lipofectamine.
Images are as follows: fluorescence microscopy image of Lipofectamine/DNA complexes
without peptide (A); overlaid fluorescence microscopy images of lipoplexes with sSV40
peptide, peptide/DNA ratio = 80 (B); overlaid fluorescence microscopy images of lipoplexes
with sSV40 peptide, peptide/DNA ratio = 108 (C). Scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 4.
Percentage of free lipid and peptide remaining after complex formation. The percentage of free
lipid (A) and peptide (B) remaining after complex formation was calculated as a function of
peptide/DNA (w/w) ratio. All values are reported as mean±standard deviation (* p < 0.05, ***
p < 0.001).
Figure 5.
Transfection at varying peptide/DNA ratios and DNA amounts. Percentage of cells transfected
(A) and luciferase expression (B) of NIH/3T3 cells transfected with peptide-lipoplexes, 0.5
μg DNA per well, 10:1 lipid/DNA ratio (w/w), with varying amounts of SV40 and sSV40
peptide added. Percentage of NIH/3T3 cells transfected as a function of DNA added per well
(C); the SV40 peptide/DNA ratio was 108 (w/w) and the lipid/DNA ratio was 10 (w/w). All
values are reported as mean±standard deviation (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Figure 6.
Percent transfection of NIH/3T3 cells by alternating the addition of lipid and SV40 peptide to
DNA. Lipofectamine was added to DNA prior to peptide (solid bars) or after peptide (dashed
bars). All values are reported as mean±standard deviation (*** p < 0.001).
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 7.
Cellular association of DNA. Radiolabeled DNA (0.5 μg per well) was complexed with varying
amounts of SV40 and sSV40 peptides and Lipofectamine (10:1, w/w, lipid/DNA) for
subsequent addition to NIH/3T3 cells. Amount of DNA associated was determined using a
scintillation counter. All values are reported as mean±standard deviation (*** p < 0.05, **p <
0.01, ***p < 0.001).
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 8.
Transfection by surface-bound lipoplexes. Luciferase expression of NIH/3T3 cells transfected
with peptide-lipoplexes immobilized to tissue-culture polystyrene, 1.25 μg DNA per well, 10:1
lipid/DNA ratio (w/w), with sSV40 peptide added. All values are reported as mean±standard
deviation (*p < 0.05).
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 9.
Accessible amines on peptide-lipoplexes. Amines on the lipoplex surface were quantified and
normalized to the amount of DNA. All values are reported as mean±standard deviation, with
different letters denoting significant difference between values (p < 0.05).
NIH-PA Author Manuscript