Overview of International Taxation & DTAA: Apt & Co LLP
Overview of International Taxation & DTAA: Apt & Co LLP
Overview of International Taxation & DTAA: Apt & Co LLP
in
Overview of
International Taxation & DTAA
CA Avinash Gupta
LLM (Vienna), FCA, LLb, B. Com. H (SRCC)
President, Tax Research Foundation
INDEX
UNDERSTANDING
CONCEPT
Marketing
Strategy
Sales
Global Representatives
Manufacturing Marketing &
Global HQ Warehouse
Unit Advertising Marketing &
Centre Business
Shifting of Development
Product Planning Manufactured Goods
& from Factory to an Delivery of Products
Technical Designs APAC Warehouse Customers
CONCEPT
CONCEPT
– at rates in force
Studycafe.in
Model DTAA –
OECD Model /
UN Model
Studycafe.in
articles
Articles - Classification
Application Definition
provision
Anti Avoidance Elimination of Miscellaneous
provisions double taxation provisions
Article 1 – Article 3 – Article 9 – Article 23 – Article 24 –
Applicability General Associated Elimination of Non
definition enterprise double taxation discrimination
Article 31 – Article 29 –
Termination Territorial
extension
Studycafe.in
Provisions
Interest, Royalty
and
Fee for Technical Services
Interest
Interest
• However, such interest may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which it
arises, and according to the laws of that State, but if the recipient is the
beneficial owner of the interest, the tax so charged shall not exceed 10 per cent
of the gross amount of the interest.
Interest
• Interest shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State when the payer is a resident of
that State. Where, however, the person paying the interest, whether he is a resident of a
Contracting State or not, has in a Contracting State a permanent establishment or a fixed
base in connection with which the indebtedness on which the interest is paid was incurred,
and such interest is borne by such permanent establishment or fixed base, then such
interest shall be deemed to arise in the State in which the permanent establishment or
fixed base is situated.
Interest
Meaning of Interest
Article 11 of DTAA
• The term “interest” as used in this Article means income from debt-claims of every kind,
whether or not secured by mortgage and whether or not carrying a right to participate in
the debtor’s profits, and in particular, income from Government securities and income from
bonds or debentures, including premiums and prizes attaching to such securities, bonds or
debentures. Penalty charges for late payment shall not be regarded as interest for the
purpose of this Article.
Payable by Exception/Condition
The Government
A resident except where the royalty is payable in respect of any right, property or
information used or services utilised for the purposes of a business or
profession carried on by such person outside India or for the purposes of
making or earning any income from any source outside India
A non-resident where the royalty is payable in respect of any right, property or
information used or services utilised for the purposes of a business or
profession carried on by such person in India or for the purposes of
making or earning any income from any source in India
Payable by Exception/Condition
The Government
A resident except where the fee is payable in respect of services utilised in a
business or profession carried on by such person outside India or for the
purposes of making or earning any income from any source outside India
A non-resident where the fee are payable in respect of services utilised in a business or
profession carried on by such person in India or for the purposes of
making or earning any income from any source in India
- Payment of Fees for Technicians’ Services do not constitute Fees for Technical
Services (FFTS) under Article 12(4)(b) of the Indo-Singapore DTAA dated
24.01.1994, as such services do not make available technical knowledge,
experience, skill, knowledge or processes, which enable the person acquiring
the services to apply the knowledge contained therein, as held by the Kolkata
Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of DCIT v/s. ITC Ltd.
(2002) 82 ITD 239 (Kol) and many other Judicial Decisions.
- The same is also not taxable in India as Business Income under Article 7 of the
Indo-Singapore DTAA as it has been represented to us that the Beneficiary does
not have a Permanent Establishment in India in terms of Article 5 of the said
DTAA.
1. Royalties or fees for technical services arising in a Contracting State and paid to
a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State.
2. However, such royalties or fees for technical services may also be taxed in the
Contracting State in which they arise and according to the laws of that State, but
if the beneficial owner of the royalties or fees for technical services is a resident
of the other Contracting State the tax so charged shall not exceed 10 per cent of
the gross amount of the royalties or fees for technical services.
3. (a) The term “royalties” as used in this Article means payments of any kind
received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of
literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematograph films or films or tapes
used for television or radio broadcasting, any patent, trade mark, design or
model, plan, secret formula or process, or for the use of, or the right to use,
industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, or for information concerning
industrial, commercial or scientific experience.
3.(b) The term “fees for technical services” as used in this Article means payments
of any kind, other than those mentioned in articles 14 and 15 of this Convention
as consideration for managerial or technical or consultancy services, including
the provision of services of technical or other personnel.
4. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the
royalties or fees for technical services being a resident of a Contracting State,
carries on business in the other Contracting State in which the royalties or fees
for technical services arise, through a permanent establishment situated therein,
or performs in that other State independent personal services from a fixed base
situated therein, and the right or property in respect of which the royalties or fees
for technical services are paid is effectively connected with such permanent
establishment or fixed base. In such case the provisions of article 7 or article 14,
as the case may be, shall apply.
Business Profits
Article 7
Permanent Establishment
• Article 5(1)
– For the purposes of this Convention, the term
“permanent establishment” means a fixed place of
business through which the business of an enterprise is
wholly or partly carried on.
(i) activities of that nature continue within that State for a period or periods aggregating more than 90 days
within any twelve-month period; or
(ii) services are performed within that State for an enterprise within the meaning of paragraph 1 of Article 10
(Associated enterprises) and continue for a period or periods aggregating more than 30 days within any
twelve-month period:
Provided that for the purposes of this paragraph an enterprise shall be deemed to have a permanent
establishment in a Contracting State and to carry on business through that permanent establishment if it
provides services or facilities in connection with, or supplies plant and machinery on hire used or to be
used in, the prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils in that State.
► Agency PE
• where a person — other than an agent of an independent status - is acting in a
Contracting State on behalf of an enterprise of the other Contracting State, that enterprise
shall be deemed to have a permanent establishment in the first-mentioned State, if :
(a) he has and habitually exercises in the first-mentioned State an authority to conclude on behalf of the
enterprise, unless his activities are limited to those mentioned in paragraph 3 which, if exercised
through a fixed place of business, would not make that fixed place of business a permanent
establishment under the provisions of that paragraph ;
(b) he has no such authority but habitually maintains in the first-mentioned State a stock of goods or
merchandise from which he regularly delivers goods or merchandise on behalf of the enterprise, and
some additional activities conducted in the State on behalf of the enterprise have contributed to the sale
of the goods or merchandise ; or
(c) he habitually secures orders in the first-mentioned State, wholly or almost wholly for the enterprise.
► LOB Clause
► Non-discrimination Clause
► MFN Clause
► GAAR
► Treaty Abuse
► Force of attraction rule
► CFC Legislation
Recent Judgments
Issues
Duty to deduct tax at source u/s 195 does not arise unless
the remittance contains wholly or partly taxable income.
GE India Technology Centre Pvt Ltd v CIT 327 ITR 456 (SC)
Where Tax authorities has accepted the fact that the NR is
not liable to pay any tax in India, the payer is not liable to
deduct TDS u/s 195.
Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd v COIT 36 DTR 425 (Del)
Maharishi Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited
Liability to deduct tax for Sale of property arises when Sale
deed clearly showed that seller is NR.
Mrs. Meena S. Patil v ACIT 30 ITR 317 (Bang Tri)
Issues
Issues
Issues
Software maintenance services provided by NR from
outside India and does not have PE in India. It is not taxable
in India.
Airport Authority of India 299 ITR 102 (AAR)
Payment for cost sharing of R&D Expenses is not treated as
FTS or royalty. Hence, no TDS is to be deducted.
ABB Limited (2010) TIOL 94 ARA-IT dt. 15.03.2010
Routine Data Processing services and document handling
services provided by a NR who is not having any PE in India
is not taxable.
RR Donnelley India Outsourcing Pvt Ltd 56 DTR 1(AAR)
Issues
Telecommunication facility provided by a NR outside India is
not regarded as FTS. Hence, no TDS.
Wipro Ltd. v ITO 133 Taxman 149 (Bang Tri)
Software Technology Parks of India v ITO 3 SOT 529 (Bang Tri)
Other charges reimbursed along-with royalty payment by a
resident hotel company to US NR is not chargeable under
Royalty under India-US DTAA. It is taxable in India only if
NR have PE in India.
Six Continents Hotels Inc. v DCIT 11 taxmann.com 332 (Mum Tri)
Payment for Database maintained outside India by NR is
not taxable in India if NR does not have PE in India.
Gartner Ireland Ltd. v DCIT 42 SOT 21
Issues
Export Commission
For:
• Circular No. 23 dt. 23.7.1969
• Circular No. 786 dt. 07.02.2000.
However there is a contrary ruling in case of Wallace Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd. 278 ITR 197 (AAR)
Reimbursement of Expenses
For:
Against:
• Samsung Electronics Co.Ltd. (Karnatka High Court )(Oct. 2011)
• Airports Authority of India Vs. DIT[304 ITR 216(AAR)]
Reimbursement of Expenses
For:
• CIT Vs. TELCO (245 ITR 823 (Bombay))
• DECTA v CIT (237 ITR 190 (AAR))
• CIT Vs. Industrial Projects (202 ITR 1014-Delhi)
• Sedco Forex International inc. vs. CIT (299 ITR 238 (Uttarakhand))
• Clifford Chance 82 ITD 106-Mumbai)
• Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (10 SOT 896 (Mum))
• Dolphin Drilling Ltd. vs. ACIT 121 TTJ 433 (Del))
Against:
• Cochin Refineries (222 ITR 354 (Ker))
• Hindalco (278 ITR 125 (AT))
• CIT Vs. Dunlop (142 ITR 493 (Cal))
• Ashok Leyland Ltd. vs. DCIT (119 TTJ 716 (Cal))
• Danfoss Ind. (268 ITR 1 (AAR))
Questions ???
Let’s Discuss
Studycafe.in