Chapter - 2 Theoretical Background
Chapter - 2 Theoretical Background
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
2.1 INDIAN BANKING SECTOR
The origin of banking in India is as early as the Vedic period. It is believed that the
transformation from money lending to banking must have occurred even before Manu, the
great Hindu Jurist, who has committed a section of his work to deposits and advances and
laid down rules relating to rates of interest. During the Mughal period, the indigenous
bankers played a very important role in lending money and financing foreign trade and
commerce. During the days of the East India Company, it was the turn of the agency houses
to carry on the banking ventures. The General Bank of India was the first Joint Stock Bank to
be initiated in the year 1786. The others which came behind were the Bank of Hindustan and
the Bengal Bank. The Bank of Hindustan is announced to have continued till 1906 while the
other two failed in the meantime.
In the first half of the 19th century the East India Company came up with three banks; the
Bank of Bengal in 1809, the Bank of Bombay in 1840 and the Bank of Madras in 1843.
These three banks also known as the Presidency Banks were separate units and functioned
well. These three banks were joined in 1920 and a new bank, the Imperial Bank of India was
established on 27thJanuary 1921. With the passing of the State Bank of India Act in 1955 the
covenant of the Imperial Bank of India was taken over by the newly constituted State Bank
of India. The Reserve Bank which is the Central Bank of India was created in 1935 by
passing Reserve Bank of India Act 1934. In the wake of the Swadeshi Movement, a number
of banks with Indian undertaking were established in the country namely, Punjab National
Bank Ltd, Bank of India Ltd, Canara Bank Ltd, Indian Bank Ltd, the Bank of Baroda Ltd, the
Central Bank of India Ltd. On July 19, 1969, 14 major banks of the country were
nationalized and in 15th April 1980 six more commercial private sector banks were also
taken over by the government of India.
ICICI Bank limited is an Indian multinational banking and financial services company
headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra with its registered office in Vadodara, Gujarat. As of
2018, ICICI Bank is the second largest Bank in India in terms of assets and market
capitalization. It offers a wide range of banking products and financial services for corporate
and retail customers through a variety of delivery channels and specialised subsidiaries in the
areas of investment banking, life and non-life insurance, venture capital and asset
management. The bank has a network of 5,275 branches and 15,589 ATMs across India and
has a presence in 17 countries including India
ICICI Bank Limited is an Indian multinational banking and financial services company
headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra with its registered office in Vadodara, Gujarat. As of
2018, ICICI Bank is the second largest bank in India in terms of assets and market
capitalization. ICICI Bank is one of the Big Four banks of India. The bank has subsidiaries in
the United Kingdom and Canada; branches in United States, Singapore, Bahrain, Hong
Kong, Qatar, Oman, Dubai International Finance Centre, China and South Africa and
representative offices in United Arab Emirates, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia. The
company's UK subsidiary has also established branches in Belgium and Germany.
ICICI Bank offers a wide range of banking product and financial services to corporate and
retail customers through a variety of delivery channels and through its specialized
subsidiaries and affiliates in the areas of investment banking, life and non-life insurance,
venture capital and asset management. ICICI Bank set up its international banking group in
fiscal 2002 to cater to the cross boarder needs of clients and leverage on its domestic banking
strengths to offer products internationally. ICICI Bank currently has subsidiaries in the
United Kingdom. Russia and Canada, branches in Singapore, Bahrain, Hong Kong, Sri
Lanka and Dubai international Finance centre and representative officers in the United
States, United Arab Emirates, China, South Africa and Bangladesh. UK subsidiary has
established a branch in Belgium. ICICI Bank is the most valuable bank in India in terms of
market capitalization.
ICICI Bank’s equity shares are listed in India on the Bombay stock Exchange and the
National stock Exchange of India Limited and its American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are
listed on the New York stock Exchange (NYSE). ICICI Bank has formulated a Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics for its directors and employees. At June 5, 2006, ICICI Bank,
with free float market capitalization*of about Rs.480.00 billion (US$ 10.8 billion) ranked
third amongst all the companies listed on the India stock exchanges.
ICICI Bank was originally promoted in 1994 by ICICI Limited, an India financial institution,
and was its wholly-owned subsidiary. ICICI’s shareholding in ICICI Bank was reduced it
46% through a public offering of shares in India in fiscal 1998, an equity offering in the form
of ADRs listed on the NYSE in fiscal 2000, ICICI Bank’s acquisition of Bank of Madura
Limited in an all-stock amalgamation in fiscal 2001, and secondary market sales by ICICI to
institutional investors in fiscal 2001, and 2002.ICICI was formed in 1955 at the initiative of
the world Bank, the Government of India and representatives of India industry. The principal
objective was to create a development financial institution for providing medium term and
long-term project financing to India businesses. In the 1990s, ICICI transformed its Business
from a development financial institution offering only project finance to a diversified
financial services group offering a wide variety of products and services, both directly and
through a number of subsidiaries and affiliates like ICICI Bank. In 1999, ICICI become the
first India Company and the first bank or institution from non-Japan Asia to be listed on the
NYSE.
After consideration of various corporate structuring alternatives in the context of the
emerging competitive scenario in the India banking industry, and the move towards universal
banking, the managements of ICICI and ICICI Bank formed the view that the merger of
ICICI with ICICI Bank would be optimal strategic alternative for both entities, and would
create the optimal legal structure for the ICICI group’s universal banking strategy. The
merger would enhance value for ICICI shareholders through the merged entity’s to access to
low-cost deposits, greater opportunities for earning fee-based income and the ability to
participate in the payment system and provide transaction-bank services. The merger would
enhance value for ICICI Bank shareholders through a large capital base and scale of
operations seamless access to ICICI’s strong corporate relationship built up over five
decades, entry into new business segments, higher market share in various business
segments, particularly fee-based services, and access to the vast talent pool of ICICI Bank
and its subsidiaries. In October 2001, the Boards of Directors of ICICI and ICICI Bank
approved the merger of ICICI and two of wholly-owned retail finance subsidiaries, ICICI
personal financial services Limited and ICICI Capital services limited, with ICICI Bank. The
merger was approved by shareholders of ICICI and ICICI Bank in January 2002, by the High
Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in March 2002, and by the High Court of Judicature at
Mumbai and the Reserve Bank of India in April 2002.
Any asset and it also includes leased asset can become Non Performing Asset when income
stops to be generated from it for the bank. It is an advance or loan where;
For 90 days’ time interest or instalment of principle amount may remain overdue.
The account an overdraft or cash credit with respect of it may remain out of order as it is
indicated below.
In case the bills are purchased or discounted then they remain overdue for more than
90days period.
The instalment for two of the crop seasons for short duration of crops remains overdue
whether it is principal or interest. The instalment for long duration crops therefore
remains overdue whether its interest or principal amount.
The instalment therefore remains overdue for one crop season for long duration crops of
principal or interest.
In respect of a securitization transaction that has been undertaken like in terms of
guidelines on securitization on dated February 1, 2006. For more than 90 days the amount
of which like of liquidity facility will remain outstanding. A debt obligation where the
borrower has not paid any previously agreed upon interest and principal repayments to
the designated lender for an extended period of time. The nonperforming asset is
therefore not yielding any income to the lender in the form of principal and interest
payments.
2.4.3 TYPES OF NPA
1 Gross NPA
2 Net NPA
1. Gross NPA: Gross NPAs are the sum total of all loan assets that are classified as NPAs as
per RBI guidelines as on Balance Sheet date. Gross NPA reflects the quality of the loans
made by banks. It consists of all the non-standard assets like as sub-standard, doubtful,
and loss assets. It can be calculated with the help of following ratio:
Gross NPAs
Gross NPAs Ratio =
Gross Advance
2. Net NPA: Net NPAs are those type of NPAs in which the bank has deducted the
provision regarding NPAs. Net NPA shows the actual burden of banks. Since in India,
bank balance sheets contain a huge amount of NPAs and the process of recovery and
write off of loans is very time consuming, the provisions the banks have to make against
the NPAs according to the central bank guidelines, are quite significant. That is why the
difference between gross and net NPA is quite high. It can be calculated by following
Gross NPAs – Provisions
Net NPAs =
Gross Advances – Provisions
Several factors are responsible for increasing size of NPAs in PSBs. The Indian banking
industry has one of the highest percent’s of NPAs compared to international levels. A few
prominent reasons for assets becoming NPAs are as under:
An internal study conducted by RBI shows that in the order of prominence, the following
factor contribute to NPAs.
Internal Factor
Diversion of funds for
Expansion/diversification /modernization
Taking up new project
Helping /promoting associate concerns time/cost overrun during the project
implementation stage
Business Failure
Inefficiency in management
Slackness in credit management and monitoring
Inappropriate Technology/technical problem
Lack of coordination among lenders
External Factor
Recession
Input/power storage
Price escalation
Exchange rate fluctuation
Accidents and natural calamities, etc.
Changes in government policies in excise/ import duties, pollution control orders, etc.
Other Factors
Liberalization of economy/removal of restriction/reduction of tariffs:-A large number
of NPA borrowers were unable to compete in a competitive market in which lower
prices and greater choices were available to consumers. Further, borrowers operating
in specific industries have suffered due to political, fiscal and social compulsions,
compounding pressures from liberalization.
Tax monitoring of credit and failure to recognize Early Warnings Signals:-It has been
stated that approval of loan proposal is generally thorough and each proposal passes
through many levels before approval is granted. However, the monitoring of
sometimes complex credit files has not received the attention it needed which meant
that early warning signals were not recognized and standard assets slipped to NPA
category without banks being able to take proactive measures to prevent this. Partly
due to this reason, adverse trends in borrower’s performance were not noted and the
position further deteriorated before action was taken.
Over optimistic promoters:-Promoters were often optimistic in setting up large
projects and in some cases were not fully above board in their intentions. Screening
procedures did not always highlight these issues. Often projects were set up with the
expectation that part of the funding would be arranged from the capital markets which
were booming at the time of the project appraisal. When the capital markets
subsequently crashed, the requisite funds could never be raised, promoter often lost
interest and lenders were left stranded with incomplete/unviable projects.
Directed lending:-Loans to some segment were dictated by Governments policies
than commercial imperatives.
Highly Leveraged borrowers:-Some borrowers were undercapitalized and over
burdened with debt to absorb the changing economic situation in the country.
Operating within a protected marked resulted economic situation in the country.
Operating within a protected market resulted in low appreciation of
commercial/market risk.
Profitability: NPA means booking of money in terms of bad asset, which occurred due to
wrong choice of client. Because of the money getting blocked the prodigality of bank
decreases not only by the amount of NPA but NPA lead to opportunity cost also as that
much of profit invested in some return earning project/asset. So NPA doesn’t affect
current profit but also future stream of profit, which may lead to loss of some long-term
beneficial opportunity. Another impact of reduction in profitability is low ROI (return on
investment), which adversely affect current earning of bank.
Liquidity: Money is getting blocked, decreased profit lead to lack of enough cash at hand
which lead to borrowing money for shortest period of time which lead to additional cost
to the company. Difficulty in operating the functions of bank is another cause of NPA
due to lack of money. Routine payments and dues.
Involvement of management: Time and efforts of management is another indirect cost
which bank has to bear due to NPA. Time and efforts of management in handling and
managing NPA would have diverted to some fruitful activities, which would have given
good returns. Now day’s banks have special employees to deal and handle NPAs, which
is additional cost to the bank.
Credit loss: Bank is facing problem of NPA then it adversely affect the value of bank in
terms of market credit. It will lose its goodwill and brand image and credit which have
negative impact to the people who are putting their money in the banks.
Profitability: NPA means booking of money in terms of bad asset, which occurred due to
wrong choice of client. Because of the money getting blocked the prodigality of bank
decreases not only by the amount of NPA but NPA lead to opportunity cost also as that
much of profit invested in some return earning project/asset. So NPA doesn’t affect
current profit but also future stream of profit, which may lead to loss of some long-term
beneficial opportunity. Another impact of reduction in profitability is low ROI (return on
investment), which adversely affect current earning of bank.
Liquidity: Money is getting blocked, decreased profit lead to lack of enough cash at hand
which lead to borrowing money for shortest period of time which lead to additional cost
to the company. Difficulty in operating the functions of bank is another cause of NPA
due to lack of money. Routine payments and dues.
Involvement of management: Time and efforts of management is another indirect cost
which bank has to bear due to NPA. Time and efforts of management in handling and
managing NPA would have diverted to some fruitful activities, which would have given
good returns. Now day’s banks have special employees to deal and handle NPAs, IIwhich
is additional cost to the bank.
Credit loss: Bank is facing problem of NPA then it adversely affect the value of bank in
terms of market credit. It will lose its goodwill and brand image and credit which have
negative impact to the people who are putting their money in the banks.