Home Work
Home Work
•Stress, Strain
•Stress–strain relationships for different types of materials
•Stress–strain relationships for a unidirectional/bidirectional lamina
And, so on:
or
There are not any planes of symmetry for the material properties in this kind
of materials.
It’s clear that subjecting anisotropic materials to uniaxial stress makes the
body under both axial and shear strains (Coupling)
Material symmetry implies that the material and its mirror image about the
plane of symmetry are identical
Solution:
1 4
2 5
4-1
4-2
Note: νij is defined as the ratio of the negative of the normal strain in
direction j to the normal strain in direction i, when the load is applied in the
normal direction i.
Then apply
So:
And, similarly:
if E1 > E2 as is the case for a lamina reinforced with fibers in the 1-direction,
then as we would expect because the lamina is stiffer in the 1
direction than in the 2-direction.
Also:
That is, the transverse deformation (and transverse strain) is the same when
the stress is applied in the 2-direction as when it is applied in the 1-direction.
4-4
where, 4-5
4-6
4-7
A. Isotropic Materials:
5-1
K is positive. if it was
negative, a hydrostatic
pressure would cause
expansion of a cube of
isotropic material.
B. Orthotropic Materials:
Based on the first law of thermodynamics,
thermodynamics the stiffness and the compliance
matrix must be positive definite (i.e, have positive principal values):
5-5
5-6
5-7
5-8
5-9
5-10
5-7
5-11
5-12
5-13
Example 5-1: Dickerson and DiMartino test: They measured Poisson's ratios
for boron-epoxy composite materials as high as 1.97 for the negative of the
strain in the 2-direction over the strain in the 1-direction due to loading in the
1-direction (v12). The reported values of the Young's moduli for the two
directions are E1=11.86 X 106 psi (81.77 GPa) and E2=1.33 x 106 psi (9.17
GPa).
Example 5-2: Find the compliance and stiffness matrix for a graphite/epoxy
lamina. The material properties are given as
Solution:
Solution (continue):
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-6 6-7
This
equation is
verified…
(Minor Poisson’s Ratio)
6-8 6-9
Question: Obtain stiffness & compliance matrices for orthotropic & isotropic
materials under plane stress condition?
Question: Show that for an orthotropic material Q11 ≠ C11. Explain why.
Also, show Q66 = C66. Explain why
7-1
7-3
&
7-5
Reuter
Matrix
7-4
Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch 97
Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina
7-3
7-6
7-5
The elements of the transformed reduced stiffness matrix are given by:
7-7
Note: The transformed reduced stiffness matrix has terms in all nine
positions in contrast to the presence of zeros in the reduced stiffness
matrix. However, there are still only four independent material constants
because the lamina is orthotropic
Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch 98
Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina
7-8
7-9
Note:
- From Eqs. (6-3) & (6-4), for a unidirectional lamina loaded in the material axes
directions, no coupling occurs between the normal and shearing terms of strains
and stresses (specially orthotropic).
- However, for an angle lamina, from Eqs. (7-6) & (7-8), coupling takes place
between the normal and shearing terms of strains and stresses.
- Therefore, Equation (7-6) & (7-8) are stress–strain equations for what is called
a generally orthotropic lamina.
Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch 99
Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina
Note:
- The only advantage associated with generally orthotropic as opposed to
anisotropic laminae is that generally orthotropic laminae are easier to
characterize experimentally
experimentally.
- In fact, there is no difference between solutions for generally orthotropic
laminae and those for anisotropic laminae whose stress-strain relations,
under conditions of plane stress, can be written as:
7-10 7-11
7-12
7-13
7-14
7-15
7-16
7-17
7-18
Chiral
Re-entrant
3: from Eq.(7-8):
4: using Eq.(7-4):
5: using Eq.(7-1):
7:
Solution:
• For a lamina stressed in its own plane, there are five fundamental
strengths::
strengths
Or
Stiffness
Strength
G12
Sandwich cross-
cross-beam test Rail shear test
(By Shockey and described by (By Whitney, Stansbarger, & Howell)
Waddoups) “It’s widely used in aerospace
industry”
Example 8-1: Find the max. value of S>0 if a stress of σx=2S, σy=–3S, and
τxy =4S is applied to the 60° lamina of graphite/epoxy. Use maximum stress
failure theory and the properties of a unidirectional graphite/epoxy lamina
given in Table of page 95.
Solution: (7-1)
Table p.95
(8-1)
• The preceding inequalities also show that the angle lamina will fail in shear.
• The maximum stress that can be applied before failure is:
Solution:
If the strength ratio is R, then the maximum stress that can be applied is
σx=2R, σy=−3R, τxy=4R
Following Example 8-1 for finding the local stresses gives
σ1=0.1714×10 R, σ2=−0.2714×10 R, τ12=−0.4165×10 R
Using the maximum stress failure theory as given by Equation (8-1) yields
R=16.33
Thus, the load that can be applied just before failure is
σx=16.33×2=32.66 MPa, σy=16.33×(−3)=-48.99 MPa, τxy=16.33×4=65.32 MPa
Note that all the components of the stress vector must be multiplied by the strength
ratio
If SR > 1: then the lamina is safe and the applied stress can be increased by a factor of
SR.
If SR < 1: the lamina is unsafe and the applied stress needs to be reduced by a factor of
SR.
SR = 1: implies the failure load.
Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch 123
Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina
Failure Envelopes:
A failure envelope is a three
three--dimensional plot of the combinations of the normal and
shear stresses that can be applied to an angle lamina just before failure
failure.
Note: In fact, if the Poisson’s ratio is zero in the unidirectional lamina, the
Note:
two failure theories will give identical results.
Example 8-3: Find the maximum value of S>0 if a stress, σx=2S, σy=–3S,
and τxy=4S, is applied to a 60° graphite/epoxy lamina. Use maximum strain
failure theory. Use the properties of the graphite/epoxy unidirectional lamina
given in Table p.95
Solution:
Considering “[S]” and “local stresses” from example 2.6 (Kaw) and example
8-1 (here):
Assume a linear relationship between all the stresses and strains until failure;
then the ultimate failure strains are
o The maximum value of S before failure is 16.33 MPa. The same maximum
value of S = 16.33 MPa is also found using maximum stress failure theory.
o There is no difference between the two values because the mode of failure
is shear. However, if the mode of failure were other than shear, a difference in
the prediction of failure loads would have been present due to the Poisson’s
ratio effect, which couples the normal strains and stresses in the local axes.
o Neither the maximum stress failure theory nor the maximum strain failure
theory has any coupling among the five possible modes of failure.
oThe following theories are based on the interaction failure theory:
Tsai-Hill
Tsai-Wu
-This theory is based on the distortion energy failure theory of Von Von--Mises
Mises’’ distortional
energy yield criterion for isotropic materials as applied to anisotropic materials.
-It is assumed that failure in the material takes place only when the distortion energy is
greater than the failure distortion energy of the material.
“Hill” adopted the Von-Mises’ distortional energy yield criterion to anisotropic materials.
“Tsai” adopted it to a unidirectional lamina. Based on the distortion energy theory, he
proposed that a lamina has failed if below inequality is violated:
8-3
The components G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, and G6 of the strength criterion depend on the
failure strengths and are found as follows:
1. Apply to a unidirectional lamina; then, the lamina will fail. Thus, Equation
(8-3) reduces to
8-4
2. Apply to a unidirectional lamina; then, the lamina will fail. Thus, Equation
(8-3) reduces to
8-5
4. Apply to a unidirectional lamina; then, the lamina will fail. Thus, Equation
(8-3) reduces to
8-7
8-8
8-9
Solution:
From example 8-1:
8-10
8-9
Where:
For Example 8-4, the modified Tsai–Hill failure theory given by Equation (2.10) now
gives:
3. The Tsai–Hill failure theory is a unified theory and thus does not give the
mode of failure like the maximum stress and maximum strain failure theories
do. However, one can make a reasonable guess of the failure mode by
calculating and . The maximum of these three
values gives the associated mode of failure.
In the modified Tsai
Tsai––Hill failure theory
theory, calculate the maximum of |σ1/X1|,
|σ2/Y|, and |τ12/S| for the associated mode of failure.
2. Prove
4. Prove
5. Plot the apparent engineering constants Ex, Ey, Gxy, Vxy, & as
functions of θ from θ=0 to θ=90 for high-modulus graphite-epoxy, an
orthotropic material with E1=30 X 10^6 psi (207 GPa), E2=0.75 x 10^6
psi (5.2 GPa), G12 =0.375 x 10^6 psi (2.59 GPa), and V12 =0.25.
8. What are the values of stiffness matrix elements C11 and C12 in terms of
the Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio for an isotropic material?
Find:
a. The stresses in the principal directions of symmetry if the strains in the
principal directions of symmetry at a point in the material are ε1 = 1 μm/m,
ε2 = 3 μm/m, ε3 = 2 μm/m; γ23 = 0, γ31 = 5 μm/m, γ12 = 6 μm/m
b. The compliance matrix [S]
c. The engineering constants E1, E2, E3, ν12, ν23, ν31, G12, G23, G31
10. Find the strains in the 1–2 coordinate system (local axes) in a
unidirectional boron/epoxy lamina, if the stresses in the 1–2 coordinate
system applied to are σ1 = 4 MPa, σ2 = 2 MPa, and τ12 = –3 MPa. Use the
properties of a unidirectional boron/epoxy lamina from Table of slide 95.
10.Find the reduced stiffness [Q] and the compliance [S] matrices for a
unidirectional lamina of boron/epoxy. Use the properties of a unidirectional
boron/epoxy lamina from Table page 95
11. The reduced stiffness matrix [Q] is given for a unidirectional lamina is
given as follows:
What are the four engineering constants, E1, E2, ν12, and G12, of the lamina?
12. Find the off-axis shear strength and mode of failure of a 60° boron/epoxy
lamina. Use the properties of a unidirectional boron/epoxy lamina from Table
page 95. Apply the maximum stress failure and maximum strain failure
theories.
Thus
“The need and motivation for developing analytical models to find these
parameters are very important”
• Volume fraction
fraction::
1-2 1-4
matrix volume fraction
1-3
1-7
1-11
1-12
1-9 1-10
Table 3-1
Table 3-2
Solution:
1. Table 3-1
Table 3-2
1-11
0.7=0.8294
3.
4.
2-Semi-empirical models
3-Elasticity approach
3-1
3-2
3-3
Assuming that the fibers, matrix, and composite follow Hooke’s law and
that the fibers and the matrix are isotropic, the stress–strain relationship
for each component and the composite is:
3-4
3-5 3-6
Solution:
Longitudinal Young’s modulus as function of fiber volume fraction and comparison with
experimental data points for a typical glass/polyester lamina. (Experimental data points
reproduced with permission of ASM International.)
3-9
3-10
3-11
Solution:
3-14
3-15
(3-15) in (3-14)
3-16
3-17 3-18
3-19
3-20
3-21
3-22
(3-20)
(3-21)
(3-22)
assumption
3-23
Solution:
(3-23)
Theoretical values of in-plane shear modulus as a function of fiber volume fraction and
comparison with experimental values for a unidirectional glass/epoxy lamina (Gf = 30.19
GPa, Gm= 1.83 GPa).
Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch 166
Micromechanical Analysis of a Lamina
Problems Chapter 3:
1. A hybrid lamina uses glass and graphite fibers in a matrix of epoxy for its
construction. The fiber volume fractions of glass and graphite are 40 and
20%, respectively. The specific gravity of glass, graphite, and epoxy is 2.6,
1.8, and 1.2, respectively. Find
a. Mass fractions
b. Density of the composite
4. Show that ,if the fibers are much stiffer than the matrix — that
is, Gf >> Gm
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
This shows that, under a combined uniaxial and bending load, the
strain varies linearly through the thickness of the beam
Consider a plate under in-plane loads such as shear and axial forces, and
bending and twisting moments:
Assumptions:
Assumptions:
• Each lamina is orthotropic.
• Each lamina is homogeneous.
• A line straight and perpendicular to the middle surface remains straight and
perpendicular to the middle surface during deformation
• The laminate is thin and is loaded only in its plane (plane stress)
4-5
4-6
Similarly, taking a cross-section in the y–z plane would give the displacement
in the y-direction as:
4-7
4-8
4-9 4-10
Example 4.1: A 0.010 in. thick laminate is subjected to in-plane loads. If the
midplane strains and curvatures are given as follows, find the global strains
at the top surface of the laminate?
If the strains are known at any point along the thickness of the laminate, the
stress–strain eq. calculates the global stresses in each lamina
4-11
(4-10) in (4-11)
4-12
4-13
Ply n:
Integrating the global stresses in each lamina gives the resultant forces per
unit length in the x–y plane through the laminate thickness as
4-14
Similarly, integrating the global stresses in each lamina gives the resulting
moments per unit length in the x–y plane through the laminate thickness as
4-15
Which gives
4-16
(4-12) in (4-16)
4-17
4-18
4-19
4-20
Knowing that:
It gives:
4-21
4-22
Extensional Matrix
relating the resultant in-plane
forces to the in-plane strains
Coupling Matrix
coupling the force and moment 4-23
terms to the midplane strains and
midplane curvatures.
Combining these eqs. gives 6 simultaneous linear eqs. & six unknown as:
4-24
1.Find the value of the reduced stiffness matrix [Q] for each ply using its four
elastic moduli, E1, E2, v12 & G12 (Eq.6-7 chap.2)
2. Find the value of the transformed reduced stiffness matrix for each ply
using the [Q] matrix calculated in step 1 and the angle of the ply (Eq.7-7
Chap.2).
3. Knowing the thickness, tk, of each ply, find the coordinate of the top and
bottom surface, hi, i = 1…, n, of each ply, using Eqs. (4-13).
4. Use the matrices from step 2 and the location of each ply from step 3 to
find the three stiffness matrices [A], [B], and [D] from Eqs. (4-23).
5. Substitute the stiffness matrix values found in step 4 and the applied
forces and moments in Eq. (4-24).
6. Solve the six simultaneous Eqs. (4-24) to find the midplane strains and
curvatures.
7. Now that the location of each ply is known, find the global strains in each
ply using Eq. (4-10).
8. For finding the global stresses, use the stress–strain (Eq. 7-6 chap.2).
9. For finding the local strains, use the transformation (Eq. 7-4 chap.2).
10. For finding the local stresses, use the transformation (Eq. 7-1 chap.2).
Example 4.2: Find the three stiffness matrices [A], [B], and [D] for a three-
ply [0/30/–45] graphite/epoxy laminate. Use the unidirectional properties
from Table of slide 95 of graphite/epoxy. Assume that each lamina has a
thickness of 5 mm.
Solution:
the transformed reduced stiffness matrix for each of the three plies is (Eq.
7-7 chap.2):
Solution:
The local strains (Eq. 7-4 chap.2) and local stresses (Eq. 7-1 chap.2) in the
30° ply at the top surface:
The portion of the load, Nx, taken by each ply can be calculated by
integrating the stress, σxx, through the thickness of each ply. However,
because the stress varies linearly through each ply, the portion of the load,
Nx, taken is simply the product of the stress, σxx, at the middle of each ply
and the thickness of the ply:
The sum total of the loads shared by each ply is 1000 N/m, (223.2+ 531.5 +
245.2), which is the applied load in the x-direction, Nx.
3. A laminate of 0.015 in. thickness under a complex load gives the following
midplane strains and curvatures:
Find the global strains at the top, middle and bottom surface of the laminate.
4. Show that, for a symmetric laminate, the coupling stiffness matrix is equal
to zero.
5. The global stresses in a three-ply laminate are given at the top and bottom
surface of each ply. Each ply is 0.005 in. thick. Find the resultant forces and
moments on the laminate if it has a top cross section of 4 in. × 4 in.
6. Demonstrate that the force per unit width on a two-layered laminate with
orthotropic laminae of equal thickness oriented at +alpha and -alpha to the
applied force is
What are A11, A12 & B16 in terms of the transformed reduced stiffnesses
of a lamina and the lamina thickness, t?