Croatian Operational Research Review 373

CRORR 6(2015), 373–386

Web analytics tools and web metrics tools:

An overview and comparative analysis
Ivan Bekavac1 and Daniela Garbin Praničević1,∗
1
Faculty of Economics, University of Split
Cvite Fiskovića 5, 21000 Split, Croatia
〈{[email protected], [email protected]}〉
Abstract. The aim of the paper is to compare and analyze the impact of web analytics
tools for measuring the performance of a business model. Accordingly, an overview of
web analytics and web metrics tools is given, including their characteristics, main
functionalities and available types. The data acquisition approaches and proper choice of
web tools for particular business models are also reviewed. The research is divided in two
sections. First, a qualitative focus is placed on reviewing web analytics tools to exploring
their functionalities and ability to be integrated into the respective business model. Web
analytics tools support the business analyst’s efforts in obtaining useful and relevant
insights into market dynamics. Thus, generally speaking, selecting a web analytics and
web metrics tool should be based on an investigative approach, not a random decision.
The second section is a quantitative focus shifting from theory to an empirical approach,
and which subsequently presents output data resulting from a study based on perceived
user satisfaction of web analytics tools. The empirical study was carried out on
employees from 200 Croatian firms from either an either IT or marketing branch. The
paper contributes to highlighting the support for management that available web
analytics and web metrics tools available on the market have to offer, and based on the
growing needs of understanding and predicting global market trends.

Key words: web analytics tools, web metrics, user satisfaction, business models, survey
of the IT and marketing sectors in Croatia

Received: October 5, 2014; accepted: October 5, 2015; available online: October 31, 2015

DOI: 10.17535/crorr.2015.0029

1. Introduction

The world is becoming increasingly aware that the Internet is evolving rapidly
and constantly growing as more and more users get online. A presence in the
web sphere is necessary for all organizations and businesses. The Internet
provides numerous multimedia features enabling and changing the way
organizations communicate with their customers, suppliers, competitors and
employees [8]. The web sphere has a direct impact on a user's perception of

∗
Corresponding author.

http://www.hdoi.hr/crorr-journal ©2015 Croatian Operational Research Society

374 Ivan Bekavac and Daniela Garbin Praničević

business success [4] and the strategic importance of web context for modern
business. It also shifts numerous business activities towards the web creating in
the same time new context of business models so called web business models.
According to [10], a business model is described as a business method used by a
particular company to generate revenue and add new value to its
product/services. The same author has also distinguished nine basic categories
of web business models such as: (1) brokerage model, (2) advertising model, (3)
model of information agent, (4) commercial model, (5) manufacturing model, (6)
affiliate/collaborative model, (7) virtual community model, (8) subscription
model and (9) utility/ancillary services model.
Within these business models five common goals [10] can be identified:
• Selling products or services online and the measuring the outcomes by
the number of products sold or services
• Creation of potential client databases and measures of the outcomes
based on the number of collected visitor contacts via web sites
• Content publication directed towards attracting as many visitors as
possible and thereby increase revenue from advertising
• Providing information to the website visitors
• Company branding
Without proper web metrics applied to a business model on a website, it is
almost impossible to measure the effects on visitors, hence proper the proper
choice of a web analytics tool is important. On the other hand, gaining insight is
also important, as to what tool is apt for unique user needs. Based on what has
been said so far, the research task is to investigate the following: Web analytics
tools track and improve a user’s satisfaction with web-based business models.

2. Basic concepts related to web analytics and web metrics

2.1. Web analytics

According to the official definition of [13], web analytics refers to a combination

of (a) measuring, (b) acquisition, (c) analyzing and (d) reporting of data
collected from the Internet with the aim of understanding and optimizing web
experience.
Measuring (a) incorporates different metrics [1] and expressed in the form
of numbers, ratios and key performance indicators (KPI’s). Data acquisition
activity (b) is mainly done through one of the two most widely used methods:
(1) using log files that gather data from a server, and (2) using popular methods
of tagging websites supported by JavaScript code.
Log files are contain data collected from a company server, regardless of
the visitor’s type of Internet browser. Data acquisition activities on a server
come in the form of a text file containing server-side collected data. These
activities are related to requests directed to a web server, such as displaying
 Web analytics tools and web metrics tools: An overview and comparative analysis 375

pages, images or PDF files [3]. On the client side, site tagging is carried out
using JavaScript code inserted into every web page and is run and recorded
each time a user opens a tagged webpage. Visitor behavior is then recorded in a
separate file [12].
Furthermore, the purpose of analyzing data (c) is to transform data into
information useful for a decision-making process [12]. In that sense, special
attention should be given to selecting appropriate web analytics tools while
taking into account a company’s specific characteristics and goals, as well as
employing the staff who are competent in “discovering” useful information for
supporting decisions that are based on large amounts of acquired data.
Finally, reports are generated (d) based on selected metrics outputs which
in turn are useful for company management.
Data originating from the Internet offers relevant information on website
traffic, website transactions, server performance and information submitted by
users themselves [9]. Understanding of the web and website optimization
provides a more adapted approach to a target audience with the goal of
increasing conversion rates [12], as well as customer loyalty [4]. Analyzing
website traffic provides insight into the number of visitors, their geolocation,
visitor locations, time spent on websites and other parameters. Web analytics
also provides other advantages such as increasing efficiency and cost reduction
[3]. Marketers can also find web analytics data useful for improving
products/services and evaluating the success of a marketing campaign. In
addition, web designers and web developers use such data for improving website
usability and consequently, website user satisfaction. Web analytics provides
company management with the insight into how to generate revenue from a
website, how to create appropriate user experience and improve its competitive
advantage [6], as well as to support continuous improvement and
competitiveness [12].
The said author proposes a definition of web analytics as follows: the
analysis of qualitative and quantitative data on the website in order to
continuously improve the online experience of visitors, which leads to more
efficient and effective realization of the company’s planned goals. Quantitative
data provide insight into visitor behavior such as the previous web page prior to
reaching the actual website. In addition, the acquisition of qualitative data
provides answers as to why visitors behave in a certain way. Continuous
improvement of online user based on information obtained in web analytics is a
key aspect of the web analytics concept.
Improved business results based on decisions supported by information
gained from web analytics certainly justify further expenditure in web analytics.

2.1.1. Web analytics as a process

Web analytics is not a technology for just reporting, but a cyclical process of
website optimization which, among other things, measures costs, identifies the
376 Ivan Bekavac and Daniela Garbin Praničević

most profitable user behavior and optimizes a website by improving performance

and profitability. Waisberg & Kaushik [12] identified the following steps in a
web analytics process:
• Objective (goal) determination
• KPIs definition
• Data collection
• Data analysis
• Change implementation
The issue of “the objectives of a website” is complex and there is no single
answer. It depends on type of business models. As an example and in terms of a
commercial business model, the objective of a website is to support product
sales by provide all the relevant information to visitors with the intention of
transforming them into buyers. Determining these activities is important, as
they lead to selecting the appropriate metrics to track the success of a website,
especially while keeping in mind that a website should achieve a certain return
on investment (ROI). Measuring the success of objectives is accomplished by
defining key performance indicators (KPIs) that show the particular progress or
detect lagging in achieving goals. Each KPI is expected to correlate with a
specific action and match the criteria/attributes of timelessness, simplicity,
relevance and usefulness. It is recommended that a defined KPI has to be
promptly available (timelessness), simple for decision maker to understand
(simple), as well as relevant (relevance) and useful (usefulness) to the specific
company.
The example [12] of one qualitatively defined KPI that covers all of these
attributes is the bounce rate defined as the percentage of visitors who leave a
website after the first page visit. This metric is simple, i.e. easy to understand
and explain. It is relevant because it identifies sites with a lower content,
technically or in terms of quality. This KPI is also timely since is readily
available in all web analytics tools. Finally, the observed KPI offers instant
usefulness given that a decision maker can act immediately and focus on pages
with a high bounce rate.
The next activity in the considered process is accurately collecting data and
saving it in a database for subsequent data analyses. Data analysis includes
observing and transforming previously collected data in order to discover useful
information that supports future decisions. During this activity, numerous
associations, patterns or trends that exist in the data set are revealed. Finally,
implementing change is the last but not least activity in the process. In other
words, collected and analyzed data provide new information and support change
implementation. Otherwise, all the previous activities are baseless. The scheme
of the web analytics process is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Activities in the web analytics process, Waisberg and Kaushik [12]
 Web analytics tools and web metrics tools: An overview and comparative analysis 377

2.1.2. Web analytics tools

A variety of web analytics tools have been developed and are available on the
market that aim to obtain quantitative and qualitative data as a basis for the
decision-making process, The author [11] has classified web analytics tools into
five categories:
1. Traditional web analytics tools that mostly relied on clickstream data
obtained by the visitors themselves, competitors and data from the
company’s internal sources.
Clickstream data generally corresponds to the question “what happens
on websites” or “visitor behavior while browsing the website” and “how
many conversions have been achieved on the website”.
2. Web analytics tools that track performance on social networks
3. Web analytics tools for gathering visitor feedback aim to answer the
question "reasons for the visitor behaving or not behaving in a certain
way".
4. Web analytics tools for mobile websites with a growing importance in
line with an increase in website turnover caused by the use of mobile
devices. These tools provide insight into visitor behavior on websites
accessed via mobile devices similar to traditional web analytics tools,
and are necessary for achieving compatibility with mobile devices [5].
5. Web analytics tools for experimenting, testing and find optimal
technical or design solutions that should improve visitor satisfaction.
In terms of the process of selecting a web analytics tool, the working team is
responsible for the following [7]:
• Distinguishing whether the company needs to implement either
reporting or an analyzing process in its business model. Accordingly,
certain ineffective tools are eliminated.
• Assessing a company’s temporary IT capabilities.
• Taking into consideration web tool features in line with a company’s
requirements.
Here, the focus is reduced solely to traditional web analytics tools based on
clickstream data within can be used to identify two categories based on the form
the tool is available: first, the software is installed on an organization’s
computers and, secondly, as a service (SaaS - Software as a Service) provided by
ASP - Application Service Provider [4]. The traditional web metrics tools are
available on the market as open source or a commercial package. Each of these
has its advantages and disadvantages (Table 1).
378 Ivan Bekavac and Daniela Garbin Praničević

Web analytics tools † Advantages Disadvantages

customizable dashboard,
conversion visualization, data
Google Analytics -
export in various formats,
advanced segmentation features
provides detailed information,
Webtrends Analytics
excellent heat maps feature, (relatively) high price
access to real time data
not recommend for
FireStats easy to use, downloadable data
beginners due to install
Web log tools

raw logs, real time data

requirements
not possible to provide
reveals how much time visitors
AWStats an in-depth analysis,
spend on site, processes raw log
neither to measure user
files, open-source
activity
does not use cookies,
Webalizer updates log files throughout the
possible overestimation
day, easy to understand reports
of data
StatCounter access to real time data,
outdated user interface
provides two levels of analysis
Mint needs server
customizable, friendly interface
configuration
customizable, data control, real
Piwik
time traffic reports, -
segmentation
Clicky real-time data, heat maps, split- interface is not user-
testing and A/B testing friendly.
Chartbeat real time data, friendly user no detailed historical
interface data available
GoSquared pinging feature that reveals how
Page tagging tools

monthly page view limit

long visitor stayed on site
FoxMetrics tracks events like newsletter key features available in
views premium plan
GoingUp includes SEO related tools,
-
provides heat maps
tracks visitor mouse movement,
eTracker (relatively) high price
survey options
IBM Unica NetInsight very flexible and customizable
(relatively) high price
reports, customizable dashboards
Stuffed Tracker feature that enables comparing installation could be
organic and paid traffic difficult for beginners
Crazy Egg
excellent heat map feature -

Table 1: Traditional features of web analytics tools analyzed by the authors

†
The online source for each presented web analytics tool is found at the end of this paper.
 Web analytics tools and web metrics tools: An overview and comparative analysis 379

The wide range of web analytics tools makes the selection process more
complex and time consuming. Accordingly, selecting the appropriate tool should
take into consideration a company’s unique characteristics. In the process of
selecting the web tool, the team using the web tool should consider usability,
functionalities, technical details and the total cost of the tool. In other words,
the market should be studied while focusing on the tool’s features such as the
possibility of installing and deploying software locally, customer support, costs,
data segmentation possibilities, download options, ownership of collected data
and the possibilities of integrating data from other sources in the actual web
analytics tool.

2.2. Web metrics

The common features of web metrics including collecting specific visitor actions
and the exclusion of search engine robots that search content on the website
while indexing it. Effective web metrics has to be based on generally accepted
terms, definitions and practices [13]. Web analytics incorporate web metrics,
thus providing benefits for online businesses [14] such as the ability to analyze
and increase sales, ability to track revenue generated by the site, ability to
identify exit pages, and consequently improving website content, the monitoring
of visitor traffic and detection of website errors. The most common types of web
metrics are available as option in web analytics tools as presented in Table 1
[13]:

• Metrics for describing visits – the category refers to dimensions such as

the front page (entry page), the target page (landing page), exit pages
(exit page) and metrics such as duration of the visit (visit duration -
time on site), source of traffic (referrer) and number of clicks on the
link (click-through rate).
• Metrics for describing visitors - the metrics in this category present
different attributes that characterize website visitors and support the
process of visitor segmentation. The metrics are: new visitors (the
number of unique visitors who created a session for the first time on the
site during the reporting period, returning visitor (indicates how many
unique visitors have interacted with the site during a reporting period,
supposing that it is their first visit before observed period, repeat visitor
(number of unique visitors who have made two or more visits to the site
during a reporting period), visits per visitor (number of visits per
visitor), recency (the time elapsed since the specific action was taken by
a unique visitor to the site) and frequency (the number of times required
by a unique visitor to take a specific action such are visit the site,
purchase or download from the site during a reporting period).
• Metrics for describing the visitor engagement – the category includes
metrics that describe the degree of visitor interaction. Accordingly, the
380 Ivan Bekavac and Daniela Garbin Praničević

related metrics calculate the proportion of those leaving a website with

respect to the total number of webpage views (page exit ratio), the rate
of withdrawal (bounce rate) and the number of visited pages per visitor
(page views per visitor).
• Conversion metrics – the collection of special website activities that
provide business value, such as metrics that indicate the number of
successfully achieved set goals (conversion) and the ratio between the
number of realized conversions and other relevant metrics (conversion
rate).
Examples of conversion rate are the number of conversions in relation to
the total number of site visits, or the number of conversions in relation to total
number of site visits where products are added to a cart.
These mentioned metrics are often a company's key performance indicators
(KPI’s) relating to easily understood indicators covering website performance
and website changes in an observed period [9].
The choice of metric depends, as mentioned above, on the company and its
goals. In spite of this, the most common key performance indicators can be
categorized by type of business model. In addition, Peterson [9] distinguishes
business models and the respective performance indicators as listed in Table 2.
Business model KPI's
Ratio of new to returning visitors, percentage of new visitors, referring
Commercial
domains, search keywords/phrases, average order value, key
model
conversion rates.
Overall traffic volume, number of visits, ratio of new to returning
Advertising model visitors, percentage of new visitors, referring domains, average number
of visits per visitor, average time on site.
Overall traffic volume, percentage of new visitors, ratio of new to
Subscription
returning visitors, referring domains, search keywords/phrases, key
model
conversion rates.
Utility model Overall traffic volume, percentage of new visitors, referring domains.
Ratio of new to returning visitors, percentage of new visitors, referring
Model of
domains, overall traffic volume, percentage of new visitors, average
information agent
pages viewed by visitor.
Manufacturing Search keywords/phrases, entry pages, referring domains, overall
model traffic volume, key conversion rates, number of visits.
Affiliate model Overall traffic volume, referring domains, average time spent on site.
Community Overall traffic volume, average time spent on site, referring domains,
model percentage of new visitors
Number of returning visitors, frequency of visit, number of visits,
Brokerage model
search keywords/phrases.
Table 2: Business models and associated performance indicators [9], modified
 Web analytics tools and web metrics tools: An overview and comparative analysis 381

Keeping this in mind, information gathered using these indicators offers a

relevant background for different ways of analyzing and generating reports,
which is operationally and strategically important for any business system.

3. Empirical research based on perception of the usefulness

of web analytics tools

The empirical section of the paper presents the results of a one-month research
(March 2015) conducted among the employees from 200 Croatian IT and
marketing firms. Employees were asked to assess their satisfaction with web
analytics tools used by their company and for the associated business model.
Therefore, the questionnaire was created using the Google Form option on
Google Drive and was sent out via e-mail. The return rate was almost 54%
i.e.107 questionnaire were completed.
The methodology analyzed the use of web analytics tools and user
satisfaction, and included descriptive statistics, Friedman test, bivariate
correlation and multiple regressions. The software package SPSS Statistics 17.0
software package was used for statistical processing and calculations.
Descriptive analyses revealed that the major part of survey respondents
were male (58.9 %), in the age group of 21 to 30 years of age (73%), university
educated (85%), introduced as users of web metrics for business purposes (67%).
Web analytics tools are used for different purposes by the respondents:
marketing (75.7%), management (36.4%), web development (13.1%) and others
fields (4.7%). The most frequently used web analytic tool was Google Analytics
(93, 5%) with the other tools (6, 5%) being Webtrends Analytics, FireStats,
Webalizer, Tableau, Flurry and ARIS Connect.
When comparing the frequency of using web analytics tool for activities
such as measuring, collecting, analyzing and reporting data, it was observed
that web tools are mostly used for collecting (mean= 3.43) and analyzing data
(mean = 3.75). Each activity also involves analyzing the user’s satisfaction with
using a web tool in regard to proper support for particular activities. The
respective mean values are presented in Table 3.

Mean
Activity
Frequency Satisfaction
Measuring 3.07 3.64
Collecting 3.43 3.75
Analyzing 3.35 3.73
Reporting 2.96 3.52
Table 3: Mean values of frequency and satisfaction with web analytics tools according
to activities (N=107)
382 Ivan Bekavac and Daniela Garbin Praničević

Using the Friedman nonparametric test, the differences in frequency of

usage for a web analytic tool according to activities have been found significant
(p=0.00), as well as the differences in level of user satisfaction (p=0.05).
The results indicate that web analytics tools are most frequently used for
advertising (mean=3.93) and commercial business models (mean=3.43) followed
by community (mean=3.42), information agent (mean=3.31), affiliate
(mean=3.26), subscription (mean=3.20), utility (mean=3.07), manufacturing
(mean=3.05) and brokerage (mean=2.92) business model. The users also express
the highest level of satisfaction relating to the advertising (mean=3.65) and
commercial (mean=3.38) models followed by the community (mean=3.35),
affiliate (mean=3.34), information agent (mean=3.27), subscription
(mean=3.22), utility (mean=3.18), manufacturing (mean=3.09) and brokerage
(mean=3.05) business model. Hereafter, Friedman nonparametric test verified
that the differences in frequency of a web analytics tool according to the
business model are also significant (p=0.00), as well as differences in the level of
satisfaction (p=0.00). A positive correlation has been proved between the usage
frequency and user satisfaction of a web analytics tool based on each activity.
The associated correlation coefficients and significances (p=0.00 for each
activity) are shown in Table 4. The activities such as measuring
(correlation=0.588) and data analysis (correlation=0.581) indicate a higher
correlation when compared with other activities.

Frequency vs. Pearson p

Satisfaction Correlation (2-tailed)
Measuring 0.588** 0.000
Collecting 0.470 **
0.000
Analyzing 0.581 **
0.000
Reporting 0.531** 0.000
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 4: Bivariate correlations between usage frequency and usage satisfaction of web
analytics tools based on each activity (N¬=107)

Furthermore, a positive correlation has been proven using a bivariate

correlation between the usage satisfaction and usage frequency of web tools
based on observed business models (p= 0.00 for each model). Business models
such as brokerage (correlation = 0.597) and advertising (correlation=0.588)
indicate a higher correlation in comparison to other models. These results are
presented in Table 5.
 Web analytics tools and web metrics tools: An overview and comparative analysis 383

Frequency vs. Pearson p

Satisfaction Correlation (2-tailed)
Brokerage 0.597** 0.000
Advertising 0.588** 0.000
Information agent 0.420** 0.000
Commercial 0.467** 0.000
Manufacturing 0.565** 0.000
Affiliate 0.465** 0.000
Community 0.418** 0.000
Subscription 0.533** 0.000
Utility 0.493** 0.000
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 5: Bivariate correlations between the usage frequency and usage satisfaction of
web analytics tools based on business models (N=107)

In order to explore which activities that are supported with certain web
analytics tool contribute more to the level of satisfaction with the business
model integration ability, the multiple regression is applied. It was found that
activities such as collecting and reporting activities, significantly contribute the
level of satisfaction with a business model. Table 6 indicates that the users are
significantly satisfied with the integration of web analytics tools in business
models during data collection activities (p=0.035) and the reporting of data
(p=0.065).

Coefficients a

Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t p
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 1.821 0.282 6.447 0.000
Satisfaction_measuring -0.009 0.079 -0.013 -0.109 0.913
Satisfaction_collecting 0.188 0.088 0.258 2.133 0.035
Satisfaction _analyzing 0.076 0.083 0.107 0.913 0.363
Satisfaction_ reporting 0.143 0.077 0.220 1.864 0.065
**. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction of web analytical tools integration/models
a.

Table 6: Multiple regression, the business model using web analytics tools (N=107)

In summary, the results indicate a significant presence and use of web

analytics in various activities within web business models, the conclusion is that
web analytics tools support and improve user satisfaction with these business
384 Ivan Bekavac and Daniela Garbin Praničević

models. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement in terms of better

integration of web analytics tools in web-based business models.

4. Results interpretation and conclusion

The empirical results based on the analysis of data collected from 107 survey
respondents indicate that web analytics tools are well accepted and applied in
IT and marketing companies. A descriptive statistic output revealed that
acceptance of web analytics tools conforms to any other acceptance of
technological innovation. In this survey, younger users dominate the age group
of users, possibly implying that the use of web analytic tools is more popular
among the younger generation [2]. The use of web analytics tools in business
fields, as expected, is most frequent in the marketing industry.
Specifically, a comparison of results points out that web analytics tools are
mostly used for data collection and analysis (Table 3), indicating the highest
observed correlation corresponds to satisfaction with measuring and analyzing
activities (Table 4), and evidently there is some room for improvement in
functionalities regarding user satisfaction in collecting data. The
recommendation is that software companies developing tools should place
additional focus on this particular set of functionalities. The survey has shown
that data collection is the most frequent tool activity and any improvement or
enhancement in this activity could have a significant impact on user
satisfaction.
Moreover, according to the obtained results, web analytics tools are most
frequently used in advertising and commercial models where users also expressed
satisfaction. Additional results indicated that the highest correlation between
the usage frequency of web analytics tools and the satisfaction with such tools is
observed in the brokerage model and in the advertising model. The expectation
was that more frequent usage of web analytics tools in the advertising model
implies a higher user satisfaction. This research has shown that use in the
brokerage model is low, and the correlation between usage frequency and usage
satisfaction of web analytics tools is the highest. It implies that web analytics
tools in the brokerage model are not recognized enough and promotion
campaigns for additional use in the model is required. The results providing a
correlation between frequency and satisfaction for the mentioned activities
(Table 4) and a correlation between frequency and satisfaction in the business
models (Table 5) are as expected.
Finally, emphasis should be placed on the fact that user satisfaction with
web analytics tools used for the collection of data and reporting of activities
improves significantly when such tools are integrated in the business models.
The conclusion that the authors stress, based on the outcome of theoretical
research, is that web analytics tools and the associated web metrics as statistical
indicators of website activity can potentially improve user satisfaction if a
 Web analytics tools and web metrics tools: An overview and comparative analysis 385

business model’s website. Regardless of the fact that some of analyzed web
analytics tools and the associated web metrics are freely available, whereas
others are not, it is undisputable that each of the tools can be integrated into
the respective business models. Successful implementation of web analytics tools
requires proper selection given that each website is unique and determined by
the nature of related business model and its supporting technologies. Thus
focusing on the proper either tools either metric, form the basis to strengthen
management support and, that may imply better business results.
The empirical research results based on the perception of web analytics
tools indicate that web analytics tools support user satisfaction on the web of
business models although further modifications are evident, at the technical and
organizational level.
Future studies in this field should include an assessment of web analytics
tools based on clickstream data for web analytics tools featured to track
performance on social networks or mobile devices, as well as tools for collecting
feedback from visitors, and for conducting different testing and experiments.

References

[1] Burby, J., Brown, A. and WAA Standards Committee (2007). Web Analytics
Definitions – Version 4.0, Web Analytics Association.
[2] Chunga, J. E, Parkb, N., Wangc, H., Fulkd, J. and McLaughlind, M. (2010). Age
differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An
extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26,
6, 1674–1684. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016.
[3] Clifton, B. (2010). Advanced Web Metrics with Google Analytics (2nd ed.). Indiana:
Wiley Publishing, Inc.
[4] Creese, G. and Veytsel, A. (2000). Web Analytics: Translating Clicks into Business.
Boston: The Aberdeen Group, Inc.
[5] Gupta, R., Mehta, K., Bhavsar, K. and Joshi, H. (2013). Mobile web analytics.
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Electronics
Engineering (IJARCSEE) 2, 3, 288–292.
[6] Kaushik, A. (2007). Web Analytics: An Hour a Day. Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
[7] Kaushik, A. (2009). Web Analytics 2.0: The Art of Online Accountability and
Science of Customer Centricity. Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
[8] Omidvar, M. A., Mirabi, V. R. and Shokry, N. (2011). Analyzing the impact of
visitors on page views with Google Analytics. International Journal of Web &
Semantic Technology (IJWesT), 2, 1, 14–32. doi:10.5121/ijwest.2011.2102.
[9] Peterson, E.T. (2004). Web Analytics Demystified: A Marketer's Guide to
Understanding How Your Web Site Affects Your Business. Celilo Group Media and
CafePress.
[10] Rappa, M. (2010). Business models on the web.
http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html [Accessed on 12 March 2014].
386 Ivan Bekavac and Daniela Garbin Praničević

[11] Teixeira, J. (2011). Get Involved: 5 Types of Web Analytics tools to start using
today! http://www.morevisibility.com/blogs/analytics/get-involved-5-types-
of-web-analytics-tools-to-start-using-today.html [Accessed on 03 June 2014].
[12] Waisberg, D. and Kaushik, A. (2009). Web Analytics 2.0: Empowering Customer
Centricity, SEMJ.org 2, No. 2.
[13] Web Analytics Association (2008). Web analytics definitions – draft for public
comment.
http://www.digitalanalyticsassociation.org/Files/PDF_standards/WebAnalytic
sDefinitions.pdf [Accessed on 10 September 2014].
[14] Zara, I. A., Velicu, B. C., Munthiu, M. C. and Tuta, M. (2012). Using analytics for
understanding the consumer online.
http://fse.tibiscus.ro/anale/Lucrari2012/kssue2012_129.pdf [Accessed on 10
September 2014].

Web analytics tools online sources:

• AWStats. http://www.awstats.org/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].

• Chartbeat. https://chartbeat.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• Clicky. http://clicky.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• Crazy Egg. http://www.crazyegg.com/ [Accessed on 04 August 2014].
• eTracker. https://www.etracker.com/en.html [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• FireStats. http://firestats.cc/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• FoxMetrics. http://foxmetrics.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• GoingUp. http://www.goingup.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].Google
Analytics.http://www.google.com/analytics/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• GoSquared https://www.gosquared.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• IBM Unica NetInsight. http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/on-
premise-web-analytics [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• Mint. http://haveamint.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• Piwik. http://piwik.org/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• StatCounter.http://statcounter.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• Stuffed Tracker. http://www.stuffedtracker.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• Webalizer http://www.webalizer.org/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].
• Webtrends Analytics. http://webtrends.com/ [Accessed on 01 August 2014].