Finance Summary PDF
Finance Summary PDF
Primary goal is to maximize the value of the firm, which is same as maximizing
shareholder wealth.
Every decision that we make as financial managers needs to come back and answer
this question:
Page 1
A dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow. This is because if I receive a
dollar today, I can invest it for the period up until I would have received the dollar in
the future. The present value technique uses discounting to find the present value of
cash flows, whereas the future value technique uses compounding to find the future
value of each cash flow.
The total amount due at the end of the investment is called the Future Value (FV).
FVn = PV x (1 + i)n
Where;
On Calculator
Note: Always clear the memory of the calculater ([2ndF] > [alpha] > [0] > [0])
Input each value in the calculator as ‘n’, ‘PV’ and ‘I/Y’ then hit ‘comp’ ‘FV’.
Page 2
FVIF Determination
Using a table only gives an estimation as the rate is only 3 decimal places, i.e. 6%
for 5 years is 1.338.
The use of discounting techniques aids in finding the current dollar amount of a
given future value.
The general formula for the present value of a multi period case for a single cash
flow can be written as:
FV n
PV =
(1+i)n
Where:
E.g. How much would you have to set aside today in order to have $20,000 five
years from now assuming the current interest rate is 7.00%?
$ 20,000
PV = =$ 14,259.72
(1.07)
5
Page 3
On Calculator
20000 [FV]
7 [I/Y]
5 [N]
[COMP] [PV]
PV = -14259.72. This does not mean the answer is a negative, but rather that it is in
a prior period to the future.
PVIF Determination
If you deposit $5,000 today in an account paying 10%, how long does it take to
grow to $10,000?
On Calculator
N = 7.27
Page 4
The Rule of 72
This rule is an approximation. If you earn r% per year, your money will double in
roughly 72 / r years.
For example, if property sales grow at 10% per year, it takes about 7.20 (72 / 10)
years to double your investment.
Test it: Assuming we double our money in 7.20 years, n = 7.2. As we did not specify a
PV or FV amount, doubling our money assumes that we will get $2 (FV) for every $1
invested (PV). Thus, using these figures to solve for (i) – as below;
FVn = PV x (1 + i)n
$2 = $1 x (1 + i)7.2
(1 + i)7.2 = $2 /$1 = 2
(1 + i) = 21/7.2
i = 21/7.2 – 1
i = 0.10 or 10%
Assume the total cost of a 3-year commerce university education will be $100,000
when your child (hopefully yet to be conceived) enters university in 20 years.
Assume you have $5,000 to invest today. What rate of interest must you earn on
your investment to cover the cost of your future child’s education?
PV = $5,000
FV = $100,000
N=5
i=x
FVn = PV x (1 + i)n
The nominal interest rate (NIR) is known as the stated, or quoted, rate (e.g.,
10% pa compounded annually),
Page 5
The NIR is simply equal to the interest rate charged per period multiplied by
the number of periods per annum,
For example, if a bank charges 1% per month on a car loan, the NIR is 1% x
12 = 12%.
Compound growth occurs when the initial value of a number increases or decreases
each period by the factor (1 + growth rate). The future value of a number after n
periods will equal the initial value times (1 + growth rate) n. The growth rate
formula substitutes g, the growth rate, for i, the interest rate.
FVn =PV ´( 1+ g)
n
Compounding Frequency
m´n
æ iö
FVn =PV ´ç1+ ÷
è mø
(m) is the frequency of compounding in a period
(i) is the stated/quoted annual interest rate, and is commonly called the
annual percentage rate or the nominal interest rate.
Page 6
Compounding Periods
Compounding an investment m times a year for n years provides for future value of
wealth:
m´n
æ iö
FVn =PV ´ç1+ ÷
è mø
For example, if you invest $50 for 3 years at 12% compounded semi-annually, your
investment will grow to:
æ 0.12 ö
2´3
æ 0.12 ö
4´2
The EAR (or effective annual yield) is the true interest rate expressed as if it were
compounded once per year.
m
æ iö
EAR =ç1+ ÷ - 1
è mø
Where;
i = the quoted annual interest rate,
m = the number of compounding periods in a year.
You have $10,000 to invest for one year and the following choices are offered by the
banks in your area:
Page 7
m
æ iö æ 0.06 ö
1
Note: (a) is not entirely necessary because we are told that 6% is compounded
annually, thus the EAR is going to be 6%.
As a borrower, (a) is more favourable because we are paying less in interest each
year.
If we are an investor, lending our money to the banks, than (b) is more favourable
because it yields a higher interest rate on our deposit.
On Calculator
365 [ (x, y) ]
5.9 [2ndF] [PV]
365, 5.9 => EFF = 6.08
Continuous Compounding
FV =PV ´ei´n
FV
PV =
ei´n
Where:
Page 8
For example, you invest $1,000 in an account today. The interest is 10% p.a.,
compounded continuously. What will the balance be in the account at the end of
five years?
PV =FV / ein
=$1, 000 / e0.10(5)
=$1, 000 /1.64872 =$606.53
2. Mixed Stream (or Multiple Cash Flow)
The approach to calculating the future value of a known mixed stream involves a
two step process.
Step One: Calculate the future value of each future amount to be received at a
comparable point in time.
Step Two: Sum all future values at a comparable point in time together to
determine the future value of the known mixed stream.
For example, you deposit $1,000 now, $1,500 in one year, $2,000 in two years and
$2,500 in three years in an account paying 10% interest per annum. How much do
you have in the account at the end of the third year?
Page 9
Total = $7,846.00
The approach to calculating the present value of a known mixed stream also
involves a two step process.
Step One: Calculate the present value of each future amount to be received at
a comparable point in time (usually T=0).
Step Two: Sum all present values at a comparable point in time to determine
the present value of the known mixed stream.
For example, you deposit $1,500 in one year, $2,000 in two years and $2,500 in
three years in an account paying 10% interest per annum. What is the present
value of these cash flows?
Once all values have been taken back to the same time period, they are comparable
and can be summed.
Total = $4,894.82
Page 10
Perpetuities
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
$PMT $PMT $PMT $PMT $PMT $PMT …
The PV of a perpetuity:
PV = CF/(1+i)1 + CF/(1+i)2 + CF/(1+i)3 + …
CF
PV =
i
Where CF = the cash flow period (i.e. payment)
i =the interest rate per period
Note: The formula values cash flows one period before the first cash flow.
Example 1: Perpetuity
A government security promises to pay $3 per annum forever. If the interest rate is
10% per annum and a payment of $3 has just been made, how much is the security
worth?
PV = CF / i = $3 / 0.1 = $30.00
The present value of the perpetuity is worth $30.00. Present value of receiving
$3.00 forever is $30.00. Indifferent as to which option. $3 forever seems preferable,
but consideration must be made to the devaluation of $3 over time.
‘Has just been made’: a payment that has just been made is irrelevant, because it
relates to all the future cash flows.
Example 2: Perpetuity
Assume an 8 percent interest rate; calculate the present value of the following
streams of payments:
(a) $1,000 per year forever, with the first payment one year from today
(b) $500 per year forever, with the first payment two years from today
(c) $2,420 per year forever, with the first payment three years from today
Page 11
Solution
(a) $1,000 per year forever, with the first payment one year from today
Timeline
T=0 T=1 T=2 T=3 T=4 etc.
$0 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 etc.
(b)$500 per year forever, with the first payment two years from today
Note: Valuing perpetuity and brings back to time 1. Must be discounted using PV =
FV/(1 + i)n in order to bring it back to PV or T=0.
(c) $2,420 per year forever, with the first payment three years from
today
Timeline
T=0 T=1 T=2 T=3 T=4 etc.
$0 $0 $0 $2,420 $2,420 etc.
Note, the future value of perpetuities is infinite because we don’t know when they
finish.
Annuities
An annuity is a cash flow stream of equal amounts, equally spaced in time for a
finite period of time (i.e. 6 years). The number of periods is fixed, this is the
difference between perpetuities (which are for an infinite number of periods).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 .
$CF $CF $CF $CF $CF $CF
Page 12
In other words, a cash flow pattern where the owner receives a regular (FIXED)
payment, at a regular (FIXED) point in time for a known (FIXED) period of time.
Important: Always assume that an annuity is ordinary, that is, assume that the
cash flow is at the end of the period.
Ordinary Annuity
0 1 2 3 4 … T
$CF $CF $CF $CF
The time period from the date of valuation to the date of the first C is equal
to the time period between each subsequent C
CF 1
PVA n = 1 -
i (1 + i) n
Where:
PVA = the discounted or present value of the annuity
CF = the cash flow received/paid under the annuity (sometimes
referred to as pmt)
n = the time period over which the annuity occurs (number of
payments)
i = the per-period interest rate
Page 13
CF 1 $100 1
PVA =PVA = 1 - = 1 - =$248.69
i (1 + i) n 0.10 (1 + 0.10)3
Example 3: On Calculator
Clear the memory before any operation [2ndF] then [ALPHA] then [0] then [0]
0 [FV]
100 [PMT]
10 [I/Y] PV = -248.69
3 [N]
[COMP] [PV]
CF
FVA n = (1+ i) n
- 1
i
Where:
The annual cash flow from an asset is $2.3m from year 1 to year 6. The cash flows
occur at year-end. The interest rate is 10% p.a. compounded annually, what is the
accumulated (future) value of this asset?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
$CF $CF $CF $CF $CF $CF
CF
FVA n =
i
(1 + i) n - 1 =
$2,300,000
0.10
(1.10) 6 - 1
FVA =$17,745,903.00
Page 14
See from this example that a rounding table gives a $1,000 difference.
Clear the memory before any operation [2ndF] then [ALPHA] then [0] then [0]
0 [PV]
2300000 [PMT]
10 [I/Y] FV = 17,745,903.00
6 [N]
[COMP] [FV]
Annuity Due
0 1 2 3 … n-1 n
$CF $CF $CF $CF … $CF
CF 1
PVA = 1 - ´(1 + i )
i (1 + i) n
FVA =
CF
i
(1 + i) n - 1 ´(1 + i)
Page 15
Kathy’s rich uncle promises her $1,000 per month, starting today, with a final
payment to be made 6 months from today. If the interest rate is 0.50 percent per
month, what is the present value of the cash flows?
Given: CF = $1,000 (or pmt) , n = 7, i = 0.50%
N = 7 because the first payment occurs today, with the last payment in six months
from today.
CF 1
PVA = 1- ´(1+ i)
i (1+ i)n
$1000 1
= 1- 7
´(1+ 0.005)
0.005 (1+ 0.005)
=$6,896.38
Example 5: On Calculator
Clear the memory before any operation [2ndF] then [ALPHA] then [0] then [0]
Need to convert to BGN mode: Beginning ([2ndF] > [FV]) Will come up with BGN.
Usually the calculator is in END. Do the save to change it back.
0 [FV]
1000 [PMT]
0.5 [I/Y] PV = -6896.38
7 [N]
[COMP] [PV]
Applications of Annuities
Equivalent Annuities
o Unequal life problem
Growth Annuities
o Cash flows that increase each year at a constant rate
Loan Amortisation
o Paying off your mortgage
Page 16
If interest rates are 5% p.a. which asset would you rather have?
One way to solve this problem is to find the PV of both cash flow streams
CF 1
PVA Asset1 = 1 - ´(1 + i)
i (1 + i) n
$2 1
= ´1 - ´(1 + 0.05)
0.05 (1 + 0.05)5
=$9.09
FV $7
PVA Asset2 = = =$6.67
(1 + i) n
(1.05)1
Step 1: Find the present value of the cash flow stream of Asset 2.
FV $7
PVA Asset2 = = =$6.67
(1 + i) n
(1 + 0.05)1
Page 17
CF 1
PVA = 1- ´(1 + i)
i (1 + i) n
CF 1
$6.67 = 1- 5
´(1 + 0.05)
0.05 (1 + 0.05)
So, CF =$1.47
Asset 1
Asset 2
Growth Annuity
A growth annuity is an annuity for which the cash flows increase at a constant rate
over time.
CF1 æ 1+g ö
n
PVA = 1- ç ÷
i-g è (1+ i) ø
Where:
PVA = the present value of the growing annuity
CF1 = the cash flow one period in the future
g = the constant growth rate per period
i = the per-period interest rate, or discount rate
Hill Enterprises is expecting tremendous growth from its newest boutique store.
Next year the store is expected to bring in net cash flows of $675,000. The company
expects its earnings to grow annually at a rate of 13 percent for the next 15 years.
What is the present value of this growing annuity if the firm uses a discount rate of
18 percent on its investments?
Page 18
n
CF1 æ 1+ g ö
PVA = 1- çç ÷÷
i-g è (1 + i) ø
15
$675,000 æ 1.13 ö
PVA = 1- ç ÷
0.18 - 0.13 çè (1.18) ÷ø
=$6,448,519.47
Amortised loan - requires the borrower to repay both the principal and interest
over time (usually, the amount paid each period is equal).
Suppose you borrowed $5,000 at an annual interest rate of 9%, and you have to
repay it over five years with equal amounts each year. What will the annual
repayment be?
CF 1
PVA = 1-
i ( 1+ i) n
CF 1
$5,000 = 1-
0.09 ( 1+ 0.09) 5
CF =$1,285.46
Page 19
A five year ordinary annuity with coupon payments of $100 has a present value of
$350. Compute the discount rate.
CF 1
PVA = 1 -
i (1 + i ) n
$100 1 1
$350 = - 5
i i i ´(1 + i )
Clear the memory before any operation [2ndF] then [ALPHA] then [0] then [0]
If you don’t have the financial calculator you can’t solve for i.
$100 1
$350 = 1 -
i (1 + i ) 5
Page 20
CF 1
A = 1 - - PV
i (1 + i ) n
A1 = Positive A at i1
A2 = Negative A at i2
You make the positive difference A1 and the negative difference A2.
i = i1 + l(i2 - i1)
= 13% + 0.2045(14% - 13%)
= 13.20%
Michelle has just won a $20 million lottery, which will pay her $1 million at the end
of each year for the next twenty years. An investor has offered her $10 million for
this annuity. She estimates that she can earn 10 percent per annum interest. She
has come to you for advice. What will you tell her? Should she accept or reject the
offer made to her?
Compare the present value of lump sum ($10m) with the PV of the
annuity:
CF 1
PVA = 1 -
i (1 + i ) n
$1m 1
= 1 - 20
0.10 (1 + 0.10 )
=$8,513,563.72
Page 21
This is less than $10 million, so she should accept the offer.
FVA =
CF
i
(1 + i) n - 1 =
1m
0.10
(1.10) 20 - 1
=57,274,999.49
CF 1
PV =$10 m = 1 -
i (1 + i ) n
10m ´0.10 1m
PMT = =
1 1
1 - n 1 - 20
(1 + i ) (1 + 0.10)
=$1,174,596.25
Page 22
Bond Payments
Bond Issuer
Person who issues the bond and must repay the face value at maturity,
i.e. the borrower
Bond Holder
Person who holds the bond certificate and will receive the face value at
maturity
Coupons will also be paid to the holder at a constant rate. The last
coupon is to be paid on the date of maturity.
Coupon (C)
Face Value (F)
Time to Maturity (n)
Bond Value
C 1 F
PB = 1 - +
i (1 + i ) n (1 + i )
n
Note: Second part of the equation is the present value of a single sum (PV ss)
Page 23
Fmn
PB =
i
(1 + ) mn
m
Example 1: Pure Discount Bonds
Find the value of a 30-year zero-coupon bond with a $1,000 par value and a
required rate of return of 6%.
F $1,000
PB = = =$174 .11
(1 + i) n
(1.06 ) 30
Because there is no coupon, the equation is simply the present value of a future
payment.
C 1 F
PB = 1 - +
i (1 + i ) n (1 + i ) n
Page 24
A bond with a face value of $1,000 and a coupon rate of 5% has 10 years to
maturity. What is the market price of this bond if the required rate of return (k d) is
5%?
$50 1 $1,000
PB = 1 - 10
+
0.05 (1.05) (1.05)10
PB =$1,000.00
Note: The coupon rate (i) is only used to determine the coupon payment. i.e.
Coupon payment = 0.05 x 1,000 = $50. Therefore, coupon payments are $50.
Because the coupon rate is the same as the required rate of return, therefore
investors in these bonds are trading at par. Investors are willing to pay the entire
$1,000 for the bond.
• If the coupon rate is the same as the required rate of return (i), then the
bond trades at par.
A bond with a face value of $1,000 and a coupon rate of 5% has 10 years to
maturity. What is the market price of this bond if the required rate of return is 6%?
$50 1 $1,000
PB = 1 - +
0.06 (1.06)10 (1.06)10
PB =$926.40
Note: If the required rate of return is higher than the coupon rate, than the bond
price must fall to compensate investors.
• If the coupon rate is less than the required rate of return (i),
then the bond trades at a discount.
A bond with a face value of $1,000 and a coupon rate of 5% has 10 years to
maturity. What is the market price of this bond if the required rate of return is 4%?
$50 1 $1,000
PB = 1 - 10
+
0.04 (1.04) (1.04)10
PB =$1,081.11
Page 25
Note: The price of the bond will increase because the required rate of return is less
than the coupon rate.
• If the coupon rate is greater than the required rate of return (i), then the
bond trades at a premium.
On Calculator
Clear the memory before any operation [2ndF] then [ALPHA] then [0] then [0]
1000 [FV]
50 [PMT] PV = -1081.11
4 [I/Y]
10 [N]
[COMP] [PV]
A bond with a face value of $1,000 and a coupon rate of 6% has 10 years to
maturity. What is the market price of this bond if the market interest rate is 10%?
Assume coupon payments are paid semi-annually (i.e. half yearly)
$30 1 $1,000
B0 = 1 - +
0.05 (1.05) 20 (1.05) 20
B0 =$750.76
Note:
C = 0.06 x 1000 = 30
i = 0.1/2 = 0.05
n = 10 x 2 = 20
Recall that the effective annual interest rate EAR measures the return of $1 in one
year.
Note: The exam questions will generally require the ‘yield’ to be phrased in terms
of the effective annual yield on the bond.
Bond Yields
Yield to maturity is the interest rate that equates a bond’s present value of interest
payments and principal repayment with its price.
Page 26
“The YTM measures the average rate of return obtained by investors if the bond is
purchased now and held until maturity and if there is no default on any of the
promised payments.”
There is an inverse relationship between market interest rates and bond price.
Why? Because the bond price is a present value and there is always a
negative relationship between PV and interest rates.
3. A bond with longer maturity has a higher relative (%) price change than
one with shorter maturity when the interest rate (YTM) changes. All other
features are identical.
Thus bonds with longer maturities are a lot more interest rate sensitive.
4. A lower coupon bond has a higher relative price change than a higher
coupon bond when the YTM changes. All other features are identical.
• Interest rate risk is the risk that arises for bond owners from unexpected
changes in interest rates.
Page 27
• All other things being equal, the greater the time to maturity, the greater
the interest rate risk.
• All other things being equal, the lower the coupon rate, the greater the
interest rate risk.
Time to Maturity
Market Interest Rate 1 Year 30 Year
5% $1,047.62 $1,768.62
10% $1,000.00 $1,000.00
15% $956.52 $671.70
20% $916.67 $502.11
Consider two 30 year bonds (A and B), both have $1,000 face value. Bond A has
coupon rate of 5% and Bond B has a coupon rate of 10%.
Time to Maturity
Market Interest Rate 1 Year 30 Year
5% $1,000.00 $1,768.62
10% $528.65 $1,000.00
15% $343.40 $671.70
20% $253.16 $502.11
In principle, shares can be valued in exactly the same way as bonds by calculating
the PV of all future CFs.
However, share valuation is more difficult than bond valuation for two reasons:
o Uncertainty of promised cash flows
o Shares have no maturity
The value of a share is the present value of all expected cash flows to be
received from the share, discounted at a rate of return (R) that reflects the
riskiness of those cash flows.
The expected cash flows to be received from a share are all future dividends.
Dividend growth is an important aspect of share valuation.
Page 28
Shares have a constant dividend (D) into perpetuity, with no growth in dividends.
This implies that:
The value of a share (P0) is then the same as the value of a perpetuity:
D
P0 =
R
Example 6: Preference Share Valuation
D $3.00
P0 = = =$20.00
R 0.15
(2) Constant Growth Valuation (DDM)
D t =D 0 ´(1 + g) t
• The value of a share (P0) is then the same as the value of a growing
perpetuity.
D t +1 D ´(1 + g) D
Pt = Þ P0 = 0 = 1
R -g ks - g ks - g
D1
P0 =
Or,
ks - g
Page 29
Assume Alpha, Inc. has just paid an annual dividend of 15 cents per share, which is
expected to grow at 5% per annum forever. What price should you pay for the
share if the required rate of return on the investment is 10%?
D 0´(1 + g)
P0 =
R- g
$0.15(1.05)
=
0.10 - 0.05
=$3.15
Note: When the dividend has just been paid, then it is dividend ‘0’. ‘Forever’ is
interchangeable with ‘expects a steady growth rate’.
We know what last period’s dividend was, but not next period (the equation
requires next payment). Then next period’s dividend is this period (0) dividend
times by the rate of growth times by the number of periods, i.e. 0.15(1.05)^1.
D1
P0 =
R- g
D
(R - g) = 1
P0
D1
R= +g
P0
What are the dividend yield and the capital gains yield in Example 6?
D1
R= +g
P0
R =5% + 5% (thus, 5% Dividend Yield and 5% Capital Gains)
R =10%
Page 30
D1 D2 Dt Pt
P0 = + 2
+... + +
(1+ R) (1+ R) (1+ R) (1+ R)t
t
A company has just paid an annual dividend of 15 cents per share and that
dividend is expected to grow at a rate of 20% per annum for the next 3 years and at
a rate of 5% per annum forever after that.
Assuming a required rate of return of 10%, calculate the current market price of
the share.
D0 = 15%.
Company’s growth is not constant (20% for 3 years, 5% forever).
RRoR = 10%.
Step 1:
Calculate the value of the dividends at the end of each year, DT (during the
initial growth period) i.e. the first three years.
D1 D2 D3 P3
P0 = + + + ....
(1+ R) (1+ R)2 (1+ R)3 (1+ i)3
Page 31
Step 2: Find the PV of expected dividends during the initial growth period.
Step 3: Find the value of the share at the end of the initial growth period.
An investment theory that states it is impossible to "beat the market" because stock
market efficiency causes existing share prices to always incorporate and reflect all
relevant information. According to the EMH, stocks always trade at their fair value
on stock exchanges, making it impossible for investors to either purchase
undervalued stocks or sell stocks for inflated prices. As such, it should be impossible
to outperform the overall market through expert stock selection or market timing,
and that the only way an investor can possibly obtain higher returns is by
purchasing riskier investments.
EMH contends that the price of a security (such as a share) quickly and
accurately reflects all information available.
Page 32
Buyers and sellers should not be able to trade on information that is not
available in the market, hence insider-trading.
An unbiased price reaction would take the price to the correct level after
information is released.
Overreaction
A biased response of a price to information in which the initial price
movement can be expected to be reversed.
Under-reaction
A biased response of a price to information in which the initial price
movement can be expected to continue.
Page 33
Information Efficiency
The EMH implies that investors cannot earn abnormal returns by using
information that is already available.
The market may be efficient with respect to some sources of information,
but not with respect to others.
It is therefore common to distinguish between 3 forms of market efficiency:
Weak Form
One of the different degrees of efficient market hypothesis (EMH) that
claims all past prices of a stock are reflected in today's stock price.
Therefore, technical analysis cannot be used to predict and beat a market.
Security prices reflect all information that can be derived from market
trading data i.e. past prices and volume.
Semi-Strong Form
This class of EMH suggests that only information that is not publicly
available can benefit investors seeking to earn abnormal returns on
investments. All other information is accounted for in the stocks price and,
regardless of the amount of fundamental and technical analysis one
performs, above normal returns will not be had. Security prices reflect all
publicly available information i.e. product line, quality of management etc.
Strong Form
The strongest version of market efficiency. It states all information in a
market, whether public or private, is accounted for in a stock price. Not even
insider information could give an investor the advantage. This degree of
market efficiency implies that profits exceeding normal returns cannot be
made, regardless of the amount of research or information investors have
access to.
Paradox: The capital market can be efficient only if at least some investors believe
it to be inefficient.
Page 34
However, if the market is less than strong-form efficient, there are incentives for
investors to seek information.
Fundamental Analysts
Research the value of stocks using NPV and other measurements of cash
flow.
Based on the idea that the value of a share is the present value of all future
cash flows.
Fundamental analysis is the study of the various factors that affect a company’s
earnings and dividends. It is a forward-looking analysis of where future cash flows
are going to come from.
The EMH predicts that most fundamental analysis will fail – given that
analysts employ current public information in estimating their evaluation.
Technical Analysts
They “key” to technical analysis is really that the market will be sluggish to
adjust to new information, so that a trend can be identified and acted upon
profitably.
This contradicts efficient market theory and is therefore not very highly
regarded.
(Whilst the Bodie et al. chapter therefore spends a bit of time on this we are
not interested in technical analysis apart from knowing what it is and its
impact for the EMH).
Page 35
In Summary
The EMH suggests that active portfolio management is a waste of time and
money.
We are not saying simply to invest in any random stock though (since they
should all be accurately valued)
In general, tests for patterns suggest that successive price changes (yields) are
uncorrelated.
Page 36
Each dot shows a pair of returns for Microsoft shares on two successive days
between August 1993 and August 1998 – is this random or is there a pattern?
Event studies are one type of test of the semi-strong form of market efficiency.
The effects of the expected profit will already be reflected in the share price
before the announcement.
Only the unexpected part of the reported profit should cause the share price
to react.
The market should also react at the time of the announcement to any
unanticipated information
Most studies use some variant of the market model as a basis for estimating the
normal rate of return on a security.
Page 37
The abnormal return on a given stock for a particular day can be calculated
by subtracting the market’s return on the same day (RM) from the actual
return (R) on the stock for that day:
AR = R – RM
Tests of market efficiency are, therefore, simultaneous tests of the pricing model
used to estimate what is ‘normal’ and of market efficiency.
Most studies use some variant of the market model as a basis for estimating the
normal rate of return on a security.
39
Cumulative Abnormal Return
34
29
24
19
(%)
14
9
4
-1
-6
-11
-16
Days Relative to annoncement date
Page 38
39
Over the years, this methodology has been applied to a large number of
events including:
o Dividend increases and decreases
o Earnings announcements
o Mergers
o Capital Spending
o New Issues of Stock
The studies generally support the view that the market is semi-strong-from
efficient
In fact, the studies suggest that markets may even have some foresight into
the future - in other words, news tends to leak out in advance of public
announcements
Strong form market efficiency requires that abnormal returns be available even to
investors who have private (inside) information about a company.
Page 39
For many years the dominant view among researchers was that stock
markets were efficient.
By the mid- to late-1970s, researchers began to find results that seemed
incompatible with the EMH.
These results were labelled ‘anomalies,’ leaving the possibility that at some
later stage they could be explained in a way compatible with the EMH.
Some Anomalies
Interrelations between anomalies may imply that if one can be explained, then
much of the mystery of other anomalies may disappear.
Examples of interrelation:
1. Data on returns
2. A model that specifies expected or normal returns
3. Tests of abnormal returns to determine whether the market is efficient
Page 40
Something wrong with the market (it is inefficient, perhaps due to irrational
behaviour by market participants).
Data Problems
Despite modern portfolio theory and the CAPM, our understanding of asset
pricing is still far from perfect.
Apparent evidence of market inefficiency may instead be nothing more than
evidence of the researcher’s imperfect knowledge of asset pricing.
o The joint hypothesis assumption of market efficiency
Page 399
Page 41
Two economists are walking down the street. They spot a $20 note and on starts to
pick it up, but the other says, ‘Don’t bother; if the bill were real someone would
have picked it up already’.
A doctrinaire belief in efficient markets can paralyse the investor and make it
appear that no research effort can be justified. The market is competitive enough
that only differentially superior information or insight will earn money; the easy
pickings have been picked.
Portfolio Diversification
Most non-institutional investors have a limited investment budget, and may find it
difficult to create an adequately diversified portfolio. This fact alone can explain
why mutual funds have been increasing in popularity. Buying shares in a mutual
fund can provide investors with an inexpensive source of diversification.
Summary
1. Statistical research suggests that stock prices seem to follow a random walk
with no discernible predictable patterns for investors to exploit. Such
findings are now taken to be evidence of market efficiency, that is, evidence
that the market prices reflect all current available information.
2. Weak form asserts that all information to be derived from past trading data
is already reflected in stock prices. The semi-strong form claims that all
publicly available information is already reflected. The strong form, which
Page 42
Independent Projects
Projects that, if accepted or rejected, will not affect the cash flows of another
project. Take on all projects if they reap the business with expected profits.
Projects that, if accepted, preclude the acceptance of competing projects. i.e. where
a business doesn’t have the necessary cash flows to invest in all projects.
A negative cash flow (initial cost outlay) is followed by a series of positive cash
inflows – hence there is one change of signs (-ve to +ve).
Two or more changes of signs – the most common is an outlay, followed by positive
cash flows, then a terminal cost in order to complete the project (e.g. repair
damaged site).
Page 43
0 1 2 3 4 5 C NC
- + + + + + C
- + + + + - NC
- - - + + + C
+ + + - - - C
- + + - + - NC
Decision Methods
Non-Discounting Methods
Discounting Methods
Non-Discounting Methods
Average Net Income = Average projects earnings after taxes and depreciation.
Average book value = Average book value of the investment during its life.
Example 1: AAR
A new machine requires an initial outlay of $80,000 and promises cash flow of
$26,000 each year for the next five years (the life of the machine). Tax rate is 30%.
What is the AAR?
Page 44
Workings:
Depreciation (Dep.) = $80,000 / 5yrs = $16,000 per year
Tax = ($26,000 – Dep.)*30% = $10,000*30% = $3,000
Average Income = CF – Dep. - Tax = $7,000
7,000
AAR = =21.88%
32,000
*Decision will depend on our pre-set cut-off rate (it is thus arbitrary and
subjective).
7,000
AAR = =17.50%
40,000
Advantages
A screening measure to ensure that new investment will not adversely affect
net income
To ensure a favourable effect on net income so that profits can be earned.
Page 45
Disadvantages
Cash flows for projects L and S are given below: (This slide will be used to
explain Payback, NPV and IRR concepts).
Page 46
Project L
The required rate of return is the minimum return that a project must earn
in order to be acceptable.
The cost of capital is often used as the minimum required rate of return for
capital budgeting purposes.
NPV: The sum of the PVs of inflows and outflows minus the cost CF0 which is
often negative.
n
NCFt
NPV =
t =0 (1 + k)
t
Page 47
Choose between mutually exclusive projects on the basis of higher NPV. (Recall
Corporate Objective – lecture 1 Intro).
Page 48
From the menu bar on the top of the screen in Excel (Microsoft office 2007),
choose insert tab and then select XY (scatter) and then follow the steps in
Chart Wizard.
Page 49
If IRR > k, then the project’s rate of return is greater than its cost – some return is
left over to boost stockholders’ returns.
Page 50
IRR = 18.13%
Decision Rule
Note: There are some potential errors with the use of IRR in deciding between
mutually exclusive projects.
Find NPVL and NPVS at different discount rates assuming projects are mutually
exclusive:
Page 51
Crossover Point is the discount rate at which the NPV for the two projects
are equal (it can be thought of as the rate of indifference).
When k is larger than the crossover rate, IRR & NPV leads to the same
decision.
When k is smaller than the crossover there is conflict between IRR and NPV
1. Find cash flow differences between the projects. See data at beginning of
the case (refer to slide 16).
2. Incremental CF’s L-S
Page 52
YR CF
0 $0
1 -$60
2 $10
3 $60
3. You Can subtract S from L or vice versa, but better to have first CF negative
2. Timing Differences
3. Lending or borrowing
4. No solution to IRR
Page 53
When NPV and IRR produce different rankings for mutually exclusive projects, the
NPV method correctly identifies the best alternative.
Clear the memory before any operation [2ndF] then [ALPHA] then [0] then [0]
1. At very low discount rates, the PV of CF2 is large & negative, so NPV < 0.
Page 54
2. At very high discount rates, the PV of both CF1 and CF2 are low, so CF0
dominates and again NPV < 0.
3. In between, the discount rate hits CF2 harder than CF1, so NPV > 0.
4. Result: 2 IRRs.
Each project has an IRR of 50%. Does this mean that they are equally
attractive?
4. No Solution to IRR
Consider Project A:
Page 55
This lecture is based upon how to determine the cash flow. A project is nothing more
than a long term business decision.
There are times when direct application of the NPV rule can lead to a wrong decision.
Consider a factory, which must have an air cleaner.
“Cleaner X”, which costs $4,000 today, has annual operating costs of $100
and lasts for 10 years.
“Cleaner Y”, which costs $1,000 today, has annual operating costs of $500
and lasts for 5 years.
Which one should we choose assuming a cost of capital for this investment is 10%?
æ - $ 100 1 ö
NPV X ,0 = - $ 4 ,000 + ç 1 - ÷ = - $ 4 ,614 .46
ç 0 .10 (1 + 0 .10 ) ÷ø
10
è
æ - $ 500 1 ö
NPVY ,0 = - $ 1,000 + ç 1 - ÷ = - $ 2 ,895 .39
ç 0 .10 (1 + 0 .1) ÷ø
5
è
Repeat projects until they begin and end at the same time,
Compute the NPV for the “repeated projects”.
Where projects aren’t easily rolled over to match cycles, i.e. when there are
projects that have, e.g. a 7-year life cycle and a 13-year life cycle.
Page 56
Note: Cleaner Y incurs a $1,500 cost at time period 5, as it is the initial start-up cost
for the project, plus the cost of the project for the year.
æ - $100 1 ö
NPVX =- $4,000 + ç 1 - ÷ =- $4,614.46
ç 0.10 (1 + 0.1)10 ÷
è ø
- $2,895.39
NPVY =- $2,895.39 + =- $4,693.20
1.15
We already know that the NPV of project Y over a 5-year period is -$2,895.39. Thus,
for the second period of 5 years, the NPV at time 5 is -$2,895.39, thus at time zero, we
discount it back 5 periods.
(1 + k) n
EAC0 =k ´NPV0
(1 + k ) n - 1
OR
NPV0 ´k
æ 1 ö
1 - ç ÷
çè (1 + k) t ÷ø
Find the NPV for Project X (Can Do on the Calculator Using Cash Flows)
æ - $ 100 1 ö
NPV X = - $ 4 ,000 + ç ´ 1 - ÷ = - $ 4,614 .46
ç 0 .10 (1 + 0 . 1 )10 ÷
è ø
Page 57
- $4,614.46 ´0.10
EAC X = =- $750.98
1
1-
(1 + 0.10 )10
(1.10)10
EAC X =0.10 ´- 4614.46 =- $750.98
(1.10)10 - 1
If using the calculator, if we find the NPV of the life period, then we can enter in the
payments and the NPV and compute the PMT using the bond method on calculator.
æ - $500 1 ö
NPVY =- $1,000 + ç ´1 - ÷ =- $2,895.39
ç 0.10 (1 + 0.10 )5 ÷
è ø
- 2,895.39 ´0.10
EACY = =- 763.80
1
1-
(1 + 0.10 )5
(1.10)5
EACY =0.10 ´- 2895.39 =- $763.80
(1.10)5 - 1
The assumption that the machines replaced and the services they provide are identical
in every aspect is unrealistic.
Revenue
Contribute to cash flow positively by a factor of (1 – tc). Tc being the corporate tax
rate. $1 increase in revenue, means $(1 – tc) increase in cash flow.
Page 58
Cost
Depreciation
Depreciation is not a real cash flow. However, it is important because it provides a tax
shelter and tax savings. Depreciation affects cash flow positively by reducing taxable
income. Every $1 increase in depreciation means an increase in cash flow of $tc.
The diminishing value basis is an accelerated allowance. With the exception of the
final year of the useful life, depreciation is a percentage of the written down value of
the asset. (The written down value or book value is the original cost less depreciation
deducted in previous years.) In the final year of its useful life the balance of the un-
deducted cost, less any residual or salvage value, may be deducted.
Working Capital
Increase in working capital during a periods means more cash is employed, i.e. a
higher cash outflow (and vice versa).
Consider net working capital separately as sales must be recorded on the income
statement when made, not when cash is received. Have to records the cost of goods
sold when corresponding sales are made, regardless of whether our suppliers have
been paid yet.
Finally, have to buy inventory to support sales although cash hasn’t been collected
yet.
Page 59
Suppose working capital required for a project, increases from period t – 1 to period t.
A change (increase) in working capital is a negative cash flow to the project.
Suppose working capital required for a project, decreases from period t – 1 to period t.
Then change (decrease) in working capital is a positive cash flow to project.
Taxation
Page 60
• If project uses a resource which could be put to some other use (i.e., has an
opportunity cost), then $ value of alternative use must be included as cash
outflow
• If accepting a project means foregoing some revenue, then this should be
charged to the current project
• The required rate of return used to discount cash flows incorporates the cost of
equity and debt.
• Including financing charges in the cash flows would be double counting.
Year 0 1 2
CF -$1,000 $600 $650
The nominal interest rate is 14%, and the inflation rate is forecast to be 5%. What is
the value of the project?
Page 61
æ $5,000 1 ö
NPV =- $10,000 + ç 1 - ÷
ç 0.0454545
è (1 + 0.0454545) ÷ø
3
=$3,733.05
1+ n
r= -1
1+ i
Where n: nominal interest rate (nominal rate of return)
r: real interest rate (real rate of return)
i: inflation rate
Purchase price
Additional capital expenditure (i.e. transportation etc. can add to purchase
price for depreciation)
Net working capital contributions
Disposal of the assets (and tax implications – i.e. whether market value > book
value)
Note: also maintenance that can occur at time period 0.
Page 62
Example
• Suppose Splash Ltd plans to replace equipment which will result in additional
revenues of $9,000 but will also increase costs by $4,000 per annum.
• Splash is able to claim additional depreciation of $3,000.
• What will its after-tax cash flow be if the company tax rate, Tc is 30%?
Method 1
Method 2
Page 63
Nutson Bolz is an assembly business run by a sole proprietor whose marginal tax rate
is 47% (CT). The owner is considering the purchase of a new fully automated
machine to replace an older, manually operated one. The machine being replaced,
now five years old, originally had an expected life of ten years, and it was being
depreciated using the straight-line method from a cost of $20,000 down to zero, and
could be sold for $15,000 . The old machine was operated by one operator who
earned $15,000 per year in salary and $2,000 per year in fringe benefits. The annual
costs of maintenance and defects associated with the old machine were $7,000 and
$3,000 respectively. The replacement machine being considered has a purchase price
of $50,000, a salvage value after five years of $10,000, and would be fully
depreciated over five years using the straight-line depreciation method. To get the
automated machine in running order, there would be a $3,000 shipping fee and a
$2,000 installation charge.
Old Machine: V: $20,000. Depreciated at $2,000 per year. Book value today:
$10,000. Market value: $15,000 (this means $5,000 capital gains). Operator earned
$17,000 per year operating (cost). $10,000 maintenance.
New Machine: V: $50,000. Salvage value after 5-years is $10,000 (meaning life of
only 5-years). Further, $3,000 and $2,000 as capital expenditure (not operational
unless spent), thus capital expenditure is $55,000.
In addition, because the new machine would work faster than the old one, investment
in raw materials and goods-in-progress inventories would need to be increased by a
total of $5,000. The annual costs of maintenance and defects of the new machine
would be $2,000 and $4,000, respectively. The new machine also requires
maintenance workers to be specially trained; fortunately, a similar machine was
purchased three months ago, and at that time, the maintenance workers went through
the $5,000 training program needed to familiarize themselves with the new
equipment. The firm’s management is uncertain whether to charge half of this $5,000
training fee to the new project. Finally, to purchase the new machine, it appears the
firm would have to borrow an additional $20,000 at 10% interest from its local bank,
resulting in additional interest payments of $2,000 per year. The required rate of
return on projects of this kind is 20%.
Page 64
(b) What are the incremental cash flows over the project’s life?
1 1 $25,660
NPV =- $47,350 + $15,360 - 4
+
0.2 0.2(1.2) 1.25
NPV $2,725.14
IRR 22.41%
Note: We don’t accept the project because it has a positive NPV, but it is
because it generates positive wealth for shareholders.
Page 65
n
E(R Asset ) =E(R) = (R i ´pi )
i =1
n 2
Var(R) =σ R = R i - E(R) ´pi
2
i =1
Note: Standard Deviation is the square root of the variance and is the proxy for risk.
n
Ri
n
R i - E(R) 2
Var(R) =σ 2R = i =1
n- 1
is crucial for working out variance of portfolios as below. But using the standard
deviation or root of variance.
Page 66
r 1,2
Where (the correlation coefficient)=
R1,2
r1,2 =Corr(R1, R2 ) =
R1 ´ R2
R1,2 =r R R ´ R1 ´ R2
1 2
The risk depends largely on the covariance between the returns on the assets.
Note: Unlikely that in the exam we will encounter portfolio of more than 3 risky
assets.
Page 67
As more shares are added, each new share has a smaller risk-reducing impact.
By forming portfolios, we can eliminate some of the riskiness of individual
shares.
However, there is a minimum level of risk that cannot be diversified away and
that is known as systematic risk.
In practice p falls very slowly after about 12-16 shares are included in a portfolio.
The idea of diversification is the basic idea behind modern portfolio theory (also
referred to as Markowitz Portfolio theory after it’s found).
Page 68
3. Investors estimate the risk of the portfolio on the basis of the variability of
expected returns. Implying we all have same set of beliefs. BUT we don’t all
have same access to information (i.e. insider trading).
4. Investors base decisions solely on expected return and risk, so their utility
curves are a function of expected return and the expected variance (or SD) of
returns only.
5. Given risk level, investors prefer high returns to lower returns and less risk
than more risk.
The point is to find the optimal portfolio make up to determine the highest risk return
pay off.
The risk and return for a portfolio made up of AGL and FOA stocks, (where WAGL
is the proportion of stock of AGL in the portfolio) calculated as:
AGL FOA
Mean return, ki 0.0016 0.0025
Stand deviation i 0.0154 0.0187
Covariance, AGL,FOA 0.00011
To illustrate let us examine the mean and standard deviation of al possible portfolios,
assuming the weights range from 0 to 1 in increments of 5% (using formula above).
Page 69
Consider a world with many risky assets; we can still identify the opportunity set of
risk-return combinations of various portfolios much like we did in the case of 2 risky
assets.
Given the opportunity set we can identify the minimum variance portfolio.
Risk averse investors will want to invest in a portfolio that is situated on he efficient
frontier.
Page 70
Introducing a risk-free asset, the opportunity set for investors is expanded and
results in a new efficient frontier: the Capital Market Line (CML).
The CML represents the efficient set of all portfolios that provides the investor
with the best possible investment opportunities when a risk-free asset is
available.
Now investors can allocate their money across the Risk free asset and a balance
managed fund.
The minimum variance portfolio (MV) lies on the boundary of the feasible set
at a point where the variance (SD) is at a minimum,
The optimal (market) portfolio (O) lies on the feasible set and on a tangent
from the risk-free asset.
Note: the optimal portfolio will have the highest Sharpe measure.
Page 71
The CML is the new efficient frontier. No interested in any other return off the CML
frontier. Low preference for risk means we choose portfolio lying lower on the CML
line. Moving up the line means changing the weighting of investment in risk free asset
or optimum portfolio. Note: the portfolio consists of ONLY risk assets.
How do we get a return greater than the optimal portfolio? The answer is in
leveraging the investment.
Markowitz suggests we can all borrow at the risk-free rate (if we want to exceed O
returns).
Because portfolio O lies at the point of tangency, it has the highest portfolio
possibility line.
Everybody will want to invest in portfolio O and borrow or lend to be
somewhere on the CML.
Therefore, this portfolio must include all risky assets and is called the market
portfolio.
Example 1
Assume that the risk-free rate of return is 8% per annum. The risky market portfolio
provides an expected return of 16% per annum and has a standard deviation of 22%.
Mr Pink has chosen a complete portfolio composed of risk-free assets and the risky
market portfolio which provides an expected return of 10% per annum with a standard
deviation of 5.50% Graph the CML
Page 72
Mr Black thinks he can do better than the market by restricting his investments to
three risky stocks which he thinks will provide the best returns. He chooses a portfolio
which provides an expected return of 18% per annum and 28% standard deviation.
Making use of the Sharpe Measure demonstrate that Mr Black has not found a risky
portfolio which is better than the market.
Solution
Researchers have shown that the best measure of the risk of a security in a
large portfolio is the beta of the security.
A measure of a security’s systematic risk.
Measures the responsiveness of a security to movements in the market
portfolio.
Interpreting Beta
The Capital Asset Pricing Model uses macro level information (as below) to
determine expected return on the market and thus on individual securities.
Where;
kM = return on the market (investing in any security in the market)
RF = Risk free rate
Beta = Sensitivity of the security to a change in market conditions
kM – RF = Market Risk Premium
Page 73
It is the line, which describes the linear relationship between expected returns for
individual securities (and portfolios) and systematic risk, as measured by beta. In
equilibrium, all securities must be priced such that their returns lie on the Security
Market Line (SML).
If a stock is not prices on the SML, then it is said to be mispriced. If you don’t own a
security that is underpriced, want to put it into a portfolio, if it is overpriced we want
to sell it to avoid the loss when the price falls (sell at a premium).
If investors raise inflationary expectations by 3%, what would happen to the Security
Market Line?
Page 74
Suppose inflation did not change, but risk aversion increased enough to cause the
market risk premium to increase by 3 percentage points.
The capital market will only reward investors for bearing risk that cannot be
eliminated by diversification. CAPM states that the reward for bearing systematic risk
is a higher expected return.
Thus, according to the CAPM, the only thing that affects the expected return of a
security is its beta.
Portfolio Beta
This beta is calculated as a weighted average of the betas of the individual assets in
the portfolio:
Where;
N = number of assets in the portfolio
Wi = Proportion of the current market value of portfolio p constituted by the
ith asset.
Page 75
Example 2
Page 76
Example 3
You are given the following variance, covariance matrix for Sifty Sasha’s Burbon Bar
(SSBB), Warren’s Winery (WW) and the market portfolio.
Additionally, you are informed that the expected return (standard deviation) for SSB
and WW are 10.4% (14.87%) and 9.20% (12.85%) respectively. The risk free rate of
interest is 8% per annum. The expected market return is 14% and you have a total of
$500,000 available for investment.
(a) Justify that the risk and return estimates quoted are correct.
Beta calculated by dividing the variance of return on SSBB by market covariance and
same with WW.
(b) Assume that you are required to create a portfolio consisting of 40%
investment in SSBB and 60% investment in WW. Calculate the Expected return
and standard deviation for this portfolio.
Page 77
(c) Assume that you are now required to create a new portfolio that consists of
investing 200,000 in SSBB shares, $200,000 in WW shares with the balance being
invested in the risk free asset. Calculate the expected return and standard
deviation of this portfolio.
1. Leverage
Results from use of fixed-cost assets or funds to magnify returns to the firm’s
owners.
Page 78
The term “levered” is thus given to a firm that has some debt → we will now
see that by adding debt we increase the financial leverage (or risk) of a
firm.
Business Risk stems from uncertainty about future operating income (EBIT). It
depends on how accurately operating income is predicted.
Operating Leverage stems from the use of fixed rather than variables costs. When
demand falls (and thus production) the fixed costs don’t decrease. A firm with a
large % of fixed costs is therefore said to have HIGH operating leverage.
In the case of bankruptcy debt holders have a prior claim on the cash flows of the
firm. Equity holders have a residual claim.
Page 79
The more debt in the firm’s capital structure, the higher the financial leverage of
the firm.
With higher financial leverage, bankruptcy is more likely and so equity holders
(shareholders) are more likely to loose out (because they have a residual claim).
Because equity holders have a residual claim in the case of bankruptcy, financial
risk concentrates business risk on equity holders.
* To maximise the value of the firm we need to pick the combination of debt (D)
and equity (S) that maximises the size of the pie.
Page 80
D/E = 0.5
D/V = 0.5/1.5 = 1/3
EPS & ROE under both capital structures (Using Above Table)
2. Capital Structure
• Capital structure refers to the way in which the 2company’s assets are
financed (excluding current liabilities).
• Debt capital generally requires a lower return than equity capital since
debt-holders have the first claim in bankruptcy and can exert greater legal
pressure against the company.
• It is important since it influences cost of capital and as such the NPV of
potential projects.
WACC= K D S P
A=¿ Kd ( 1−Tc ) + + Ks+ Kp¿
V V V
• Miller and Modigliani wrote a paper in 1958 entitled “The cost of capital,
corporate finance and the theory of investment”.
Page 81
Consider two Firms: They generate the same operating income and only differ via
their capital structure.
Assumption One: You do not want to expose yourself to too much risk
Note: Make use of information about firms U and L above, but additionally: assume
EBIT = $2,000.00
An Illustration Extended
Consider two Firms: They generate the same operating income and only differ via
their capital structure.
Recall EL = VL – DL
Assumption Two: You are now willing to take a little more risk
Page 82
With homemade leverage we can make the risk of the investment in the levered
firm the same as the risk of the investment of the unlevered firm.
MM 1958 – Assumptions
No taxes,
Homogenous expectations of the firm’s future EBIT,
Homogenous business risk classes,
All cash flows are perpetual and all earnings are paid out as dividends (PV =
EBIT (1−Tc)
C/R – or ),
R UL
Perfect capital markets,
o i.e. perfect competition, no transaction costs, investors &
corporations can borrow & lend at the same rate.
Proposition I – 1958
VL = VU
Implication: Changing the mix of debt and equity financing (capital structure) does
not affect the value of the firm.
Proposition II – 1958
Page 83
The cost of equity (return investors demand from investing in a company – higher
levels of debt financing require higher return) of a levered firm is equal to:
(a) The cost of equity of the unlevered firm in the same risk class, plus
(b) A risk premium
Discount rate for NPV will be completely unaffected by the capital structure of the
firm.
WACC-U = WACC-L
Implication: An increase in leverage (debt financing) doesn’t affect the discount
rate used for a project.
The Cost of Equity, the Cost of Debt, and the Weighted Average Cost of
Capital: MM Proposition II with No Corporate Taxes
Page 84
MM 1963 – Assumptions
New assumptions:
Note: Personal tax is ignored, but the other assumptions from 1958 is held.
Proposition I – 1963
VL = VU + TD
Implication:
The value of the levered firm is equal to:
(a) The value of an unlevered firm in the same risk class, PLUS
(b) The gain from leverage (this is the value of the tax saving and is calculated
as tax rate (T) times debt (D)).
The value of the levered firm is higher because a smaller piece of the pie is
“lost” to tax.
Tax saving associated with debt is realised as long as interest is paid on the
firm’s debt.
Page 85
Proposition II – 1963
Some of the increase in equity risk and return is offset by the interest tax shield.
Implication:
The cost of equity of a levered firm is equal to:
The cost of equity of an unlevered firm in the same risk class, PLUS
A risk premium to compensate financial risk
• The premium is less in a tax world due to tax savings than in a non-tax
world.
Implication:
The more highly geared the company becomes, the more tax relief it obtains
and the smaller its tax liability.
In a world with tax relief on debt interest we would expect a company’s
after tax WACC to be progressively lowered as it increases its gearing.
In a world
where there is
tax relief on debt
interest, we
would expect a
company’s after-
tax WACC to be
progressively
lowered as it
increased its
level of gearing.
(1-T) brings cost
of equity
(capital) down.
Page 86
M&M suggest financial leverage doesn’t matter, or imply that taxes cause the
optimal financial structure to be 100% debt.
In practice, most executives do not like a capital structure of 100% debt because
that is a state known as “bankruptcy”.
We will introduce the notion of a limit on the use of debt: financial distress.
CBI has $200,000 in debt due to financing their business at a cost of 8%. The
EBIT of an otherwise identical but unlevered firm is $30,000 and cost of
equity 10%. Assume that the tax rate is 30%.
Page 87
WACC= K D S
A=¿ Kd ( 1−Tc ) + + Ks¿
V V
$ 200,000 $ 20,000
Fill in first equation = 0.08 ( 1−0.3 ) +
$ 220,000 $ 270,000
Critique of MM – 1963
Borrowers incur costs, such as bankruptcy and agency costs that largely
offset the value of the interest tax shield.
4. Bankruptcy Costs
Debt provides tax benefits but puts pressure on the firm - Why?
Interest and Principal payments are obligations & if not met, might result in
bankruptcy
Bankruptcy costs thus tend to offset the advantages of having debt
Example:
Firms A and B plan to be in business for one more year. They forecast a cashflow of
either $100,000 or $50,000 in the coming year, each occurring with 50%
probability. The firms have no other assets. Previously issued debt requires
Page 88
If the cash flow is only $50,000 bondholders will be informed that they will not be
paid in full. These bondholders are likely to hire lawyers to negotiate or even sue
the company.
The firm is likely to hire lawyers to defend itself. Assume legal costs of $10,000.
Page 89
The possibility of bankruptcy has a negative effect on the value of the firm.
It is not the risk of bankruptcy itself that lowers the value but the cost
associated with bankruptcy that lowers the value.
When a firm has debt, conflicts of interest arise between stockholders and
bondholders. These conflicts of interests (called AGENCY COSTS) are magnified
when financial distress is incurred.
Examples:
1. Incentive to take large risks
2. Incentive toward underinvestment
3. Milking the property
Eg: Consider two mutually exclusive projects, a low risk one and high risk one.
There are two equally likely outcomes, recession and boom. Previously issued debt
requires a payment of $100,000 of interest and principal.
Page 90
Example:
Consider a firm with a $40,000 payment of principal and interest due at the end of
the year. It will be pulled into bankruptcy by a recession because its cashflow will
be only $24,000 in that state. The firm could avoid bankruptcy in a recession by
raising new equity to invest in a new project. The project costs $10,000.
To pay out extra dividends in times of financial distress. In other words equity is
withdrawn through dividend payments.
There is thus less left for bondholders, who have the first claim to the assets in
case of bankruptcy.
Page 91
There is a trade-off between the tax advantages of debt and the costs of financial
distress. This is often called the static trade-off theory of capital structure.
Taxes and bankruptcy costs can be viewed as just another claim on the cash flows
of the firm.
Page 92
Let G and L stand for payments to the government and bankruptcy lawyers,
respectively.
V = S+ D + G + L
So far it has been employed to discount cash flows, calculate the NPV, compared to
the IRR and employed as the required rate of return.
The cost of capital (COC) is the rate of return the firm must earn to maintain its
market value and attract investors.
It is also how much it costs the firm to finance its assets (the cost of debt and equity
financing).
Projects with a return > COC will improve the firm’s value.
Projects with a return < COC will harm the firm’s value (have a negative
NPV).
COC is estimated:
Target capital structure is the optimal mix of debt and equity financing for the
firm:
• Most firms seek to maintain a desired mix of debt and equity funding
• Each new chunk of capital should fit with the overall mix
• We know that the return earned on assets depends on the risk of those
assets, the riskier assets are, the higher the required rate of return,
Page 93
• The return to an investor is the same as the cost to the company, investors
will require a return at least compensating them for the risk they take in
investing,
• Cost of capital provides us with an indication of how the market views the
risk of the companies assets
• Knowing the cost of capital can also help us determine the required return
for capital budgeting projects
Required Return
• The required return is the same as the appropriate discount rate and is
based on the risk of the cash flows
• We need to know the required return for an investment before we can
compute the NPV and make a decision about whether or not to take the
investment
• We need to earn at least the required return to compensate our investors
for the financing they have provided.
Cost of Capital is the required rate of return on the main types of financing:
The overall cost of capital is a weighted average of the individual required rates of
return (costs).
Point out that the coupon rate was the cost of debt for the company when the bond
was issued. We are interested in the rate we would have to pay on newly issued
debt, which could be very different from past rates.
Page 94
Point out that if we have other financing that is a significant part of our capital
structure, we would just add additional terms to the equation.
• Suppose there is a bond issue currently outstanding that has 25 years left to
maturity. The coupon rate is 9% and coupons are paid semiannually. The
bond is currently selling for $908.72 per $1,000 bond. What is the cost of
debt?
– n = 25yrs x 2 = 50
– Coupon = $1,000 x (0.09/2) = $45
– M = $1,000
– Pb = $908.72
C 1 FN $45
PB = 1 - + $908.72 = 1 -
1
+
$1,000
i (1 + i ) n (1 + i )
n
kd (1 + k ) (1 + k )50
d
50
d
• YTM = kd = 5%
Reminders:
• Preference shares generally pay a constant dividend every period.
• Dividends are expected to be paid every period forever.
Kp = D1/P or Kp = DP/NP
Page 95
Where:
DP = the annual preference share dividend
NP = the net proceeds from sale of preference share.
A company has preference shares that have an annual dividend of $3. If the current
price is $25, what is the cost of the preference share?
Kp = 3/25 = 12%.
Cost of Equity
The cost of equity is the return required by equity investors given the risk of the
cash flows from the firm.
There are two major methods for determining the cost of equity.
Start with the dividend growth model formula and rearrange to solve for k s.
Dt +1
P0 =
R- g
Dt +1
R = +g
P0
Where R is the same as ks, the cost of equity. i.e. cost of equity = D1/ P0 + Growth
Suppose that a company is expected to pay a dividend of $1.50 per share next year.
There has been a steady growth in dividends of 5.1% per year for this company and
the market expects this to continue. The current price is $25. What is the cost of
equity using the DGM?
$1.50
kS = + 0.051 =0.111 or 11.10%
$25
Page 96
One method for estimating the growth rate is to use the historical average (if we
don’t know the growth rate).
Disadvantages
• Only applicable to companies currently paying dividends (i.e. never has, not
just not at present).
• It does not explicitly consider risk, i.e. Beta, Sharpe, SD ratio etc. Cost of
equity should include risk, but it doesn’t explicitly state it.
E ( Ri ) =RRF + b i ( E ( RM ) - RRF )
Page 97
Example 4: CAPM
Suppose the same company introduced in Example 3 has an equity beta of 0.58.
Additionally assume the current risk-free rate is 6.1% and the expected market risk
premium is 8.6%. What is the cost of equity capital for this company using the
CAPM?
Since we came up with similar numbers using both the Dividend growth model and
the SML approach, we should feel pretty good about our estimate (Refer to
Example 3).
It is telling us how much the market portfolio earns ( E(RM )), in addition to what
can be earned Risk Free (RRF). The premium is the whole bracket above, the return
on the market is only (RRF) part of the equation.
Advantages
Disadvantages
• Have to estimate the expected market risk premium, which does vary over
time.
• Have to estimate the beta, which also varies over time.
• We are relying on the past to predict the future, which is not always
reliable.
Suppose a company has a beta of 1.5. The market risk premium is expected to be
9% and the current risk-free rate is 6%. Analysts’ estimates have been used to
determine that the market believes the dividends will grow at 6% per year. The last
dividend was $2. The stock is currently selling for $15.65. What is the cost of equity?
Note: We can use either CAPM or DGM because all information is present.
Page 98
We can use the individual costs of capital that we have computed to get our
“average” cost of capital for the firm.
This “average” is the required return on the assets, based on the market’s
perception of the risk of those assets.
The weights are determined by how much of each type of financing is used.
Notation:
S = market value of equity – No. outstanding shares times price per share.
D = market value of debt – No. bonds times bond price.
Weights:
S S
= =x the proportion (weight) financed through equity
S+ D V os
Value of the firm (VF) = Value of the firm’s equity (Vs) + Value of Debt (Vd)
Thus in order to determine weight of equity (Ws) in capital structure; Vs/ Vf, same
applies for debt, Vd/Vf (Wd).
D D
= =x DPT proportion (weight) financed through debt
S +D V
Suppose you have a market value of equity equal to $500 million and a market
value of debt of $475 million. What are the capital structure weights?
The market value of the firm is more important as the market value of equity and
debt is used by the market to determine other assumptions.
Page 99
Preference shares and other forms of financing must be including in the formula
WACC =x D k DPT (1 - t ) + x ps k ps + x os k os
= Wd x Kd (1-T) + Wp x Kp + Ws x Ks
Weight of debt x cost of debt (1-T – after tax) + weight of preference shares x cost
of preference shares + weight of equity x cost of equity.
If the firm is an all equity firm and has no debt, then the WACC formula collapses
to:
WACC =xos k os
Since the firm is equity only, S/V = 1. Hence,
WACC =k os
That is, the WACC for an all equity firm is just the cost of equity capital .
Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) Ltd. want to determine their WACC. Their 11% semi-
annual bonds (par value $1,000) are selling for $942.65 with 10 years remaining
until maturity. KKR has 10,000 bonds currently on issue. The preference shares
issued at $2.00 per share, pay $0.20 dividends and are currently selling in the
market for $1.60. There are 5 million preference shares outstanding. The firm also
has 5 million ordinary shares on issue, which have a current market price of $5.00
each. Assume that the current risk-free rate is 7% and the return on market
portfolio is 12%. KKR has a beta, which has been recently estimated at 1.2. The tax
rate is 30%.
Page 100
Must calculate cost components (of debt Kd, of equity Ks, preference shares Kp)
Then must estimate capital structure/ weight (Wd, Ws, Wp)
Cost of Debt:
55 1 1000
942.65 = 1 - +
k d (1 + k ) 20 (1 + k d ) 20
d
Þ kd =0.06 or 6.00%
Cost of debt (on bonds) is just the yield to maturity on the bond!!
Must write down the formula despite whether or not calculator is used.
DP 0.20
= =0.125 or 12.50%
kps =
N P 1.60
We use $1.60 (and not $2) because $1.60 is the current market value (price).
Cost of Equity:
Page 101
= $8.00 m
Using the WACC as our discount rate is only appropriate for projects that
are the same risk as the firm’s current operations (assumption made).
If we are looking at a project that is NOT the same risk as the firm, then we
need to determine the appropriate discount rate for that project.
i.e. divisions also often require separate discount rates.
The WACC is not very useful for companies that have several disparate divisions.
A firm that uses one discount rate for all projects may over time increase the risk of
the firm while decreasing its value.
Page 102
The dotted hurdle line is the WACC. Will incorrectly rejected positive NPV because
with lower risk, of course they are going to offer a lower return, but why wouldn’t
we accept it?
Incorrectly accept negative NPV projects because higher return than the WACC
looks acceptable but it has a negative NPV because it does not meet the SML
requirements. With higher risk, we should require a higher rate of return, by the
WACC wouldn’t incorporate this.
Subjective Approach
Page 103
β of return is 1.3. At 10%, because we have lower risk, we will expect lower return.
The ability of a company to pay dividends will be related both to profitability &
liquidity.
Distributable profits,
Cash available.
Dividends are not always in the form of cash. Frequently companies declare share
dividends.
Two types of shares paid; regular or special dividends. In the US, dividends are paid
quarterly, where as in the UK, Australia and NZ, dividends are paid semi-annually.
Page 104
Share dividend: Firm issues new shares in lieu of paying a cash dividend. If 10%,
receive 10 shares for each 100 shares owned.
Share split: Firm increases the number of shares outstanding, say 2:1. Thus, sending
shareholders more shares.
Both share dividends and share splits increase the number of shares outstanding, so
“the pie is divided into smaller pieces.”
Unless the share dividend or split conveys information, the share price falls so as to
keep each investor’s wealth unchanged.
Cum-Dividend Rate: The last day that the buyer of a share is entitled to the
dividend. US convention has this as 3 business days before record date.
Ex-Dividend Date: Anyone holding share before this date is entitled to a dividend
(2 business days before Record Date in the US).
Cum-Dividend Rate: The last day that the buyer of a share is entitled to the
dividend.
Ex-Dividend Date: Anyone holding share before this date is entitled to a dividend
(4 business days before Record Date).
Page 105
Taxes complicate things a bit. Empirically, the price drop is less than the dividend
and occurs within the first few minutes of the ex-date.
Dividend Change
Managers avoid making a change in their level of dividend payments if it will have
to be reversed later. Thus, the level of dividends is more stable than the level of
earnings. Firms smooth out changes in their dividends relative to changes in their
earnings. We call this dividend smoothing.
Dividend change = adjustment rate x target change (not on formula sheet, but may
be asked):
Where:
t = target payout ratio
s = adjustment rate
Div1 = Dividend per share in year 1
Div0 = Dividend per share in year 0
E1 = Earnings per share in year 1
Lintner’s simple model suggests that the dividend depends in part on the firm’s
current earnings and in part on the dividend for the previous year.
The probability of an increase in the dividend rate should be greatest when current
earnings have increased and the company believes the increase is sustainable.
Page 106
In MM’s world dividend policy is irrelevant in the sense that it cannot affect
shareholder’s wealth. The effect of any particular dividend policy can be offset
without cost by managers adjusting the firm’s sale of new shares and by investors
adjusting their dividend streams through share repurchases.
Assumptions of MM (1961)
Firms should never forgo positive NPV projects to increase a dividend (or to pay a
dividend for the first time).
Suppose firms A and B are all-equity firms with a 10% cost of equity capital.
Initially, both firms have $1000 in assets and can earn a 10% return on assets with
certainty. Firm A pays out all of its earnings in dividends while Firm B has a 60%
dividend payout. Assume that there are no taxes and that the first dividend is paid
at the end of the first year. Find the market value of equity for both firms.
The fact that both companies have the same value is consistent with the
Miller-Modigliani dividend irrelevance proposition.
Page 107
Share Repurchases
Instead of declaring cash dividends, a firm can rid itself of excess cash through
buying shares of their own share.
Retained earnings lead to capital gains. Since capital gains can be deferred (i.e. not
paid until the asset is sold), the tax rate on dividends is greater than the effective
rate on capital gains. This could cause investors to prefer firms with low payouts.
Consider a firm that has $1 million in cash after selecting all available positive NPV
projects.
Tax and legal benefits from high dividends – Some organisations that
pay no tax, or low tax. So receiving a dividend isn’t a disincentive.
Page 108
After a company has paid tax on their earnings and then pay dividends,
shareholders can apply for a tax credit to offset the tax the company has already
paid and then not pay tax on dividends (applies if individual pays tax at the same or
lower rate than the company).
In the US, shareholders are taxed twice. Once at the corporate level and once at the
personal level. Here is a two individual comparison:
0% 39.6%
Operating Income $100 $100
Corporate tax (Tc = 0.35) $35 $35
After Tax income (paid as div) $65 $65
Income tax $0 $25.70
Cash to Shareholder $65 $39.30
Under imputation tax systems shareholders receive a tax credit for the company
tax paid by the firm.
Page 109
Company tax is assessed on corporate profits in the normal way, at the corporate
tax rate (Tc).
For each dollar of franked dividends paid by the company, resident shareholders
will be taxed at their marginal rate (Tpe) on an imputed dividend of $Div/(1-
Tc). This is referred to as the grossed-up dividend. The grossed-up dividend is equal
to the dividend plus the imputation credit.
Franked Dividends
Unfranked Dividend
The result is that franked dividends are effectively tax free to Australian residents,
if the investor’s marginal tax rate is equal to the corporate tax rate.
If the investor’s marginal tax rate is less than the corporate rate, then the investor
will have excess tax credits which can be used to reduce tax on other income.
If the investor’s marginal tax rate is greater than the corporate rate, some tax will
be payable by the investor on the dividend.
Investors pay tax, at their marginal rate, on any unfranked dividends received.
If companies retain profits, their share price is likely to rise relative to companies
which distribute profits, giving rise to capital gains tax liabilities for shareholders if
and when the shares are sold.
If all company shares were held by resident investors with marginal tax rates less
than company tax rates, then the optimal dividend policy for an Australian
company is one which at least pays dividends to the limit of its franking account
balance.
Page 110
Many individuals have personal marginal tax rates that are greater than
the company tax rate and may have a tax-based preference for retention of
profits.
An announcement of a dividend payout will not affect the share price. But an
announcement of a change in dividend payout will. This is because of “information
content” or “signalling” hypothesis to investors.
Managers hate to cut dividends, so they won’t increase dividends unless they
think the increase is sustainable. So, investors view dividend increases as
signals of management’s view of the future.
A policy whereby a dividend (consistent with the target payout ratio) is declared
from whatever is left of earnings after expenditure have been netted.
ABC has a residual dividend payout policy with a 40% target payout ratio. If
revenue was $12,000,000, expenditure $4,000,000 and the company has
10,000,000 issued shares. What would the dividend per share be?
Page 111