Sprue System Design
Sprue System Design
Ganoksin is sponsored by
There is general agreement that the junction between the feed sprue
and the pattern should be filleted to smooth the flow of liquid metal and
reduce investment erosion; however, there is much disagreement about
how great the fillet should be and the transition shape. Some prefer the
shape of the feed sprue to flare out widely at the junction and some
think that such a wide flare is harder to cut and clean up and not
otherwise necessary to get a sound casting. The latter group prefers a
small fillet and little or no transition. Both groups seem to make good
castings.
Ganoksin is sponsored by
Terminology
Another thing jewelry casters have not come to agreement on is what to
call the various parts of a cast tree. A few years ago, in a presentation at
the Santa Fe Symposium, Albert Schaler did one of his many services for
the jewelry caster by bringing to our attention that we should not use
the word sprue to name more than one part in a cast tree. He drove the
point home by insisting that we all call the feed between the main sprue
and the pattern the GATE, and we all had some fun ribbing anyone who
called it a sprue thereafter.
Figure 1 shows a tree, as we would build it for finger rings. The funnel-
shaped opening in the investment mold forms the Sprue Button and that
is always described as the bottom of the tree even if it is facing up. Of
course, the opposite end is always the top of the tree. The trunk of the
tree is called the Sprue or Main Sprue. The limb (branch) of the tree is
called a Feed Sprue and the object of the casting is called the Pattern.
There are also Runners and Secondary Sprues, but we can address them
later.
Ganoksin is sponsored by
A few years ago, some simple experiments were carried out to help
understand the fluid dynamics of feed sprues. Two 3 mm tubes were
produced and attached to the end of a pipe. One tube was 3mm inside
from end to end and the other was squashed flat on one end to mimic a
sprue that had been hammered to a flat taper, Figure 3.
Ganoksin is sponsored by
The pipe was filled with water and the time for the water to pour out of
each tube was measured. The round tube drained the water in 21
seconds and the flattened tube drained the same amount of water in 38
seconds. So the round sprue allowed 45% more fluid through than the
flattened sprue could in the same time. If we think about how the metal
freezes we can imagine that the solidification starts at the interface with
the investment on all sides and progresses inward to a point farthest
from the surface. If the narrowest section of the flattened sprue were 1
mm and to keep the problem simple we said the rate of solidification
was 1 mm per second, then it would take the flattened sprue one half
second and the round sprue two and a half seconds to freeze solid.
These are rough numbers, but they indicate that the 3 mm round sprue
will allow a pattern to fill in almost half the time the flattened sprue
would require and that the round sprue stays open about five times as
long. That is an impressive difference, but why is it important for the
sprue to stay open a long time, doesn’t the metal stop flowing as soon
as the pattern cavity is completely filled? The answer is yes and no: in
the first stage, the liquid metal completely fills the pattern cavity and it
does stop flowing, because all the space is occupied.
Ganoksin is sponsored by
The Basics
In Figure 4 we can see the same ring shape in three configurations. The
ring on the left has a thin shank, the top is solid and heavy and a nice
feed sprue is attached to the bottom. This ring would surely have a great
deal of porosity if it were cast as shown. If the requirement was to cast
the ring without secondary feed sprue starts to fill. This can be tested
with a rubber mold by turning the wax injector pressure down until the
pattern fill is incomplete. If the secondary feed sprue is feeding from the
pattern as well as the primary feed sprue and is discontinued between
the two points, then it is back feeding and not doing the intended job.
Ganoksin is sponsored by
A ‘Y’ is a balanced fluid system because, when the metal gets to the
junction where it splits into two streams, the metal will not favour one
side or the other unless some other force (such as centrifugal casting) is
involved.
Ganoksin is sponsored by
The metal will fill the pattern before the secondary feed sprues start to
fill. The last point to fill will be mid-point of the secondary feed sprues.
Figure 6 shows a more balanced feed sprue system in which the metal
will flow to the top of the cross in about the same time it flows to the
arms of the cross and the last points to fill will be mid-arm on each side.
Notice that the attachment point to the main sprue is different than that
in Figure 5.
Runners
A runner originates at the main sprue and has several feed sprues
attached to multiple patterns or multiple points on a single pattern.
Runners generally fill to the end and then backpressure starts the metal
to flow into the feed sprues. Figure 7 has an example of runners
properly used. Having a stock of cast tapered runners and feed sprues
on hand can greatly reduce the time required to prepare them for a
master model.
All the heat lost to the investment from the metal must be through the
surface interface. We know that investment is a poor conductor of heat
and measurements taken by Dieter Ott show that, after the metal is
cast, only 1 to 1.5 mm thickness of investment material next to the
metal will experience any temperature change and naturally, as the
metal cools, the adjacent investment heats.
The temperature of the metal may have been the same when it was
cast, but each pattern holds a different amount of metal and, therefore,
a corresponding amount of heat energy. The 4 mm thick pattern will
discharge 4 times the heat to the investment relative to the 1 mm
pattern. This means the temperature rise of the investment will be much
greater around the 4 mm pattern than around the 1 mm pattern and the
2 mm pattern should be in-between.
If the metal temperature and the flask temperature are correct for the 1
mm pattern (this is the hardest to fill and requires higher temperature),
then the temperature will be too high for the larger patterns and gas
porosity is likely.
2. When the pattern has high surface area and low volume (thin
patterns), the flask temperature influence is greater then that of the
metal temperature. As volume increases in ratio to surface area
(thick patterns), the flask temperature influence on the system
temperature decreases.
4. When thin and thick patterns are on the same tree, the flask
temperature has to be high enough to fill the thin patterns, and
would be too high to cast the thick patterns at their best system
temperature.
Do not expect all the different patterns to cast well on any one tree;
rather, the purpose is to find out how each pattern casts at a
temperature combination. If there are five patterns on the tree, one cast
will give a good idea how each of these different patterns will cast at a
given temperature set and, therefore, five experiments are performed in
one cast. This is called a designed experiment, whereby the normal
methodical testing process is shortcut.
A set of test trees, as described above, are cast using a grid of flask and
metal temperatures. Your grid should note the alloy and the patterns
being cast. Put the presumed temperature sweet spot in the center of
the grid as shown, Table 2; in this case, the flask temperature is 550°C
and metal 1000°C. Cast one flask at each temperature combination on
the grid above, below and at each side of the sweet spot. Make sure all
the flasks are well soaked at the casting temperature before casting.
Holding the flask for three or four hours at casting temperature is
considered prudent to get good experimental results.
After casting, inspect the casting in the as-cast condition, record the
results and send any promising casting through finishing and normal
quality inspection. A simple inspection criterion can be used to grade the
casting for evaluating test results.
Inspection Criteria
All casting inspected and rated as a 1, 2 or 3 where
1 = any casting that can be finished and would pass internal quality
control
2 = any casting that can be repaired, finished and would pass internal
quality control
3 = any casting that is rejected, not economic to repair
In most cases, the casting graded #3 will be sorted out in the as cast
condition. Some #2 castings may be identified in the as cast condition,
or subsurface defects may show up later. Wax patterns must be free of
any powder. By careful inspection of wax patterns before casting,
defects attributed to the mold and wax pattern can be eliminated. Care
should be given to identify any defect that can be attributed to
investment or burnout. Fins from cracked investment, or voids caused
by investment inclusions, for example, are not temperature related
casting defects and should be excluded from this test grading. A short
list of defects that should be attributed to wrong System Temperature
are incomplete filling, gas porosity, shrinkage porosity, rough surface
(where the wax was smooth), and cracks.
After the castings are graded, the score (1, 2 or 3) for each pattern
number is recorded on a test results chart, Table 3. The test data is easy
to understand in this form and trends can quickly be seen. The example
in Table 3 clearly shows the best flask and metal temperature for casting
pattern # 213 in alloy 18KY. Pattern 213 was picked to represent a
larger selection of patterns that were judged to have similar surface-to-
volume ratios and, therefore, would be expected to cast well at similar
flask and metal temperature. So all patterns that are represented by
pattern 213 in the test should be cast at metal 980° and flask 550°.
The goal is to get all grade one castings and it is possible that that is not
achieved for a pattern in the temperature grid that was picked for the
test. In Table 4, pattern 347 is used to show how the chart can identify
trends. Metal 1000° and flask 600° is the best, but not good enough.
Since Metal 1020° and Flask 550° is much better than Metal 980° and
Flask 550°, the trend to improve would be to increase metal
temperature to 1020°. This could be done as a single cast test, or a new
grid could be formed with a new presumed sweet spot.
Another designed experiment can be used to find the feed sprue design
that works best for any pattern. This time, only one pattern design will
be used on the tree, but it will be attached with five different feed sprue
configurations. Using wax wire (or wax feed sprues made in a rubber
mold, Figure 11), attach feed sprues to the patterns in different
locations. Build a tree in the same manner as the system temperature
and test with three patterns on the tree with each of the five or six feed
sprue configurations, Figures 12a and 12b. One flask may be all that is
required to solve the defect, but if the results are not satisfactory, then
make and cast additional flasks on a new temperature grid.
Attachment Point
The geometry of the pattern itself can be used to enhance the
effectiveness of the feed sprue. In Figure 13, the same pattern was cast
on the same level of the same tree with a palladium white gold alloy.
The pattern on the left was cast with a flat feed sprue and the two
patterns on the right were cast with the same tapered round sprue.
Attaching the feed sprue to the point of the heart allows the metal to
flow more smoothly, providing a complete fill where the same size and
shape feed sprue didn’t do as well when attached to the side of the
heart.
Pattern Position
Sometimes pattern position can make a difference too. A silver pin in the
form of a bow with stone setting prongs in the center is an example of
such a feed sprue study. When the system temperature that produced
the smoothest as-cast surface was used, several feed sprue
configurations were tried with strongly varying results. The single feed
sprue in Figure 14 produced shrinkage porosity on the opposite loop
from the attachment point. Adding a second feed sprue, Figure 15, only
moved the porosity. When the position was changed from vertical to
horizontal with two feed sprues, Figure 16, the porosity was eliminated
but prongs did not fill completely. The prongs could be filled in this
position by increasing the metal temperature but the surface was not as
good as desired.
To our surprise, adding a third feed sprue to the center, Figure 17, still
didn’t fill the prongs completely. Finally, using two feed sprues and
facing the pattern to the flask wall gave excellent results, Figure 18a.
Figure 18b shows the successful feed sprue arrangement on the left side
of a tree with a control pattern of a previous arrangement on the right.
If the control patterns cast as expected and the new feed sprue is
better, then you can be more certain that there is real improvement in
the feed sprue design and the result was not an anomaly. Why the
position made a difference in this case is not known and this subject
needs more study.
Where is the Gate?
At the beginning of this article, a promise was made to discuss gates in
more detail. Remember the discussion about the shrinkage of
solidification and metal flowing to fill the void space it causes. If you
have ever cast an ingot, you have undoubtedly been witness to this
shrinkage. When the ingot is first poured, the liquid metal is slightly
domed on the top, Figure 19a. When the metal has solidified, the top will
have a big sink that is greatest in the center. The difference in volume is
nature’s graph of the volume lost to the shrinkage of solidification. If a
casting were made with two spheres connected by a rod, as pictured in
Figure 19b, and fed at one end by a large feed sprue, the metal would
fill the entire cavity. The little rod would be the first place to start
freezing, because it has relatively little volume compared to the surface
area in contact with the investment.
The spheres, on the other hand have a great volume relative to their
surface area. After all the metal has solidified, the sphere connected to
the feed sprue would have little shrinkage porosity while the other
sphere would have shrinkage porosity equal to the total shrinkage of
solidification for that volume and alloy. The reason for the difference is
the gate. When the little rod froze, it became the gate stopping the flow
of metal to the second sphere, while the large feed sprue was able to
continue feeding metal to the first sphere while it was shrinking. This is
a classic thick-thin-thick pattern that is always a recipe for shrinkage
porosity.
A pattern can be placed on this little template for study about how to
best attach the feed sprue before any metal work is done, Figure 23.
These two patterns will best fit in a 125 mm or 5 inch diameter flask.
Three of the dog pattern, Figure 24, can be cast on a level in a 100 mm
diameter flask. However, there are limited options for the gate
attachment points. The attachment angle of the feed sprue becomes
evident but might not have been without the sprue gauge. Six of the
same dog pattern will fit on a level in a 125 mm diameter flask, Figure
25. The gate attachment points are more limited unless fewer patterns
are on a level. A 150 mm diameter flask can hold 8 parts around with a
lot of flexibility for feed sprue attachment points and design, Figure 26.
Depending on the structure of the pattern, any one of these gate designs
could work. Casting all of them in the same test flask is the easy way to
see which of them is the best. Make a temporary mold on the master
model. Wax patterns from the temporary mold can have feed sprues
attached by hand in different configurations and test cast before
committing the master model to the feed sprue that will be used in
production. Knowing the product can be cast economically before
production starts will save a lot of wasted time and money.