Examinable Supplements
Examinable Supplements
10
CHAPTER
Cost and Management Accounting
Additional Material
Contents
Labour Costing
1 Introduction to labour costing and labour cost control
2 Management of productivity and efficiency
3 Wage incentive plans
4 Learning curve theory
5 Recording and accounting for labour cost
Process Costing
1 Cost of rework
2 Addition of materials in subsequent process
INTRODUCTION
Learning outcomes
The overall objective of the syllabus is to equip candidates with techniques of cost
accounting to provide a knowledge base for decision making skills.
LO2 On the successful completion of this chapter, candidates will be able to
demonstrate an understanding of different costing systems
LO 1.9.1 Discuss productivity and efficiency measurement in relation to controlling
labour costs
LO 1.9.2 Explain the concept of remuneration systems, incentive wage plans and types
therein
LO 1.9.3 Record labour costs
LO 1.9.4 Apply the impact of learning curve theory on the productivity of employees
LO 2.5.4 Account for the cost of rework
LO 2.5.5 Account for the units added in subsequent departments
Labour Costing
Introduction
Measuring labour activity
Labour payment methods
Basis of labour cost control
1.1 Introduction
Labour cost is the second important element of the cost of production after
material cost. Labour costs constitute a major portion of the total cost of a
product or service that may take the form of wages, salaries and/or other
incentives of employee remunerations. The profitability and growth of the entity
depends greatly upon the proper utilization of the human resources that in turn
needs to be properly recoded and controlled.
Types of labour cost:
The labour cost has two types:
Direct Labour Cost: Direct labour cost is any cost that is specifically
incurred for or can be readily charged to or recognized with any specific
contract, job or work order. In cost accounting it is classified as direct
labour cost which becomes part of prime cost.
Example: In a watch manufacturing factory, a worker operating a molding
machine to produce a part of wrist watch.
Indirect Labour Cost: Where the direct labour can be recognized with and
charged to the job, the indirect labour cannot be so charged and hence is
treated as part of the factory overheads.
Example: Wages paid to supervisor of a factory or salary paid to driver of
delivery van used for distribution of the product.
Wage payments are generally based on the productivity, time and skill or the
combination of these three. Proper control and accounting for this cost factor and
motivation of worker is important in bringing efficiency to an enterprise.
Example:
Wage payment based on productivity: Wages paid on the basis of number of
units produced, like stitching 2000 pieces of shirts at Rs. 75 per piece.
Wage payment based on time: Wages paid on the basis of number of hours
a worker worked in a production line, like 160 hours paid at Rs. 175 per
hour.
Wage payment based on skill: A wage differentiation due to varied skills,
like skilled workers are paid higher than apprentice for the same job.
Example:
Mr. X is supposed to produce six units in every hour at work. The standard
productivity rate is six units per hour for every employee. During the week he
made 252 units in 38 hours of work. The productivity ratio is worked out as:
The total production in the week is 252 units.
Productivity is a relative measure of the hours actually taken and the hours that
should have been taken to make the output.
It might be determined in either of the following two methods
Method 1:
252 units should take 42 hours
But took 38 hours
Productivity ratio = 42/38 x 100 110.5%
Method 2:
In 38 hours Mr.X should make 228 units
But made 252 units
Productivity ratio = 252/228 x 100 110.5%
Comment: A productivity ratio greater than 100% indicates that the actual
efficiency is better than the standard or expected level of efficiency.
Time rate
Time rate/ time work or basic pay is where the employee gets paid on the basis
of his time spent at work. The most common form of this type is a day-rate
system.
The formula used for calculating wages under this method is:
Wages = Hours worked x Per hour pay rate
Overtime: If an employee works for more hours than the basic daily
requirement or on days which do not constitute a part of the working week
(e.g. Saturdays and Sundays), then he may be entitled to an overtime
payment. The overtime hours are usually paid at a premium rate such as
“time and a quarter”, “time and a half” or “double-time”.
Time and a quarter for example, means that 1.25 times the basic hourly
rate is paid for hours worked in excess of the basic requirement. The
overtime premium is the extra rate paid over and above the basic rate.
If employees work unsocial hours, e.g. overnight, then they are entitled to a
shift premium which is quite similar to an overtime premium and means that
the employees are paid at an increased hourly rate.
Example:
If the basic rate of pay per hour is Rs. 6 and overtime rate is time and a half, then
calculate the overtime premium for 8 hours worked in excess of the basic
requirement.
Solution:
Rs.
Basic Pay (8 x Rs. 6) 48
Overtime premium (8 x Rs. 3) 24
Total (8 x Rs. 9) 72
Piecework
Under this method the employee is paid an agreed amount for each unit of output
completed or for each task carried out. Output units per hour may also be an
agreed upon number that is referred to as “standard hour produced”. It is also
normal under piecework scheme that the employees get a guaranteed minimum
wage regardless of the number of units produced. This safeguards them from
loss of earnings when the production is low and is not on account of their own
fault.
The wages under the piecework system can be calculated as:
Wages = Units produced x Per unit pay rate
Example:
ABC Publishers Limited pays wages to workers working on book binding machine
at the rate of Rs. 17 per book. Workers are not paid for the misaligned binding and
such book is scraped for Rs. 15 per kg. The policy motivates the workers to work
hard and maximize productivity. However, the rate of wastage in ABC is 3% as
against industry average of 1%.
ABC re-visited the wage policy and felt that it is likely that workers tend to
compromise the quality because of insignificant loss they suffer due to bad quality.
It intends to bring a policy whereby a deduction of Rs. 70 will be made from the
wages for each misaligned binding beyond 1% industry average. However, it is
estimated that such policy will reduce the efficiency of workers because they would
reduce the speed to achieve desired quality benchmark and avoid deduction.
The cost controller of ABC is supposed to work out the differential cost and revenue
to evaluate the policy before implementation. For this purpose, cost controller
needs precise data with reasonable accuracy about the machine capacity, labour
related wastage, impact of slow speed and contribution margin per unit.
Introduction
The importance of measuring productivity and efficiency
2.1 Introduction
Labour productivity can be described as a ratio between labour hours and units
produced. Labour efficiency measures how efficiently workers produce a given
quantity of units. Productivity can be stated in one figure, such as; in Engine
Installation Department 3 units per 8 labour hours is the productivity of the
department. In assessing efficiency a single figure would not suffice. There
should be any comparable figure, like own historical data, industry average or
budgeted productivity.
Example:
Waqas Motors Limited achieved 3 units per 8 labour hours productivity in 2015-16
in Engine Installation Department as against 2.8 units per 8 labour hours in 2014-
15. The department efficiently utilized its human resources in the year 2015-16 as
compared to 2014-15
Efficiency is achieved through high motivation and skills of workers and by better
processes and quality of machines and tools. Improved productivity positively
impacts the business profits and the earnings of workers.
It may be noted that productivity and efficiency measures generally indicate
number of output as against the labour input and do not usually refer to the quality
and level of bad workmanship. The quality aspect is also important to achieve the
objectives of cost controls.
Example:
In a production department the performance standards for a production of 3,000
units are set as 2,000 hours at Rs. 90 per hour. If 2,200 hours are used at standard
rate of Rs. 90 per hour to produce 3,000 units then there is an unfavourable labour
efficiency ratio of 90.9% (2,000 /2,200). In rupee term the unfavourable variance
is Rs. 18018 computed as (100%-90.9%) * 2,200*90.
There can be a variance as against the performance standards, which arises due
to difference in wage rates. Therefore, a total variance between the performance
standards and actual results is analyzed in a way that we arrive at the break up
of both variances, namely, labour efficiency variance and labour rate variance.
Example:
In a production department the performance standards for production of 3,000
units are set as 2,000 hours at Rs. 90 per hour. If 2,200 hours are used at Rs. 85
per hour to produce 3,000 units, the analysis of variance is as follows:
Actual 2,200 labour hours at Rs.85 per hour Rs.187,000
Standard 2,000 labour hours at Rs.90 per hour Rs.180,000
Total variance (unfavourable) Rs. 7,000
Labour rate variance
Actual 2,200 labour hours at Rs.85 per hour Rs.187,000
At standard rate 2,200 labour hours at Rs.90 per hour Rs.198,000
Variance (favourable) Rs. 11,000
Labour efficiency variance
At standard rate 2,200 labour hours at Rs.90 per hour Rs.198,000
Standard 2,000 labour hours at Rs.90 per hour Rs.180,000
Variance (unfavourable) Rs. 18,000
Net (unfavourable) Rs. 7,000
The above analysis shows the importance of proper analysis before reaching to any
conclusion about the efficiency of labour force.
Introduction
High day-rate system
Individual bonus schemes
Group bonus schemes
Profit sharing schemes
Share incentive schemes
3.1 Introduction
In general, bonus/incentive schemes initially had been introduced for workers
who had been working under a time-based system, in order to compensate them
for their inability to increase their earnings. Wage incentive plans refer to
performance linked compensation paid to improve motivation and productivity.
Incentive schemes may either be short-term or long-term schemes.
Bonus systems base workers’ earnings on a combination of extra time served
and work done. The indirect labour is usually paid on a weekly or monthly basis,
such wages and salaries may also be increased by bonus payments.
Amount of work
Time taken done
Bonus
system
Time Piecework
Time allowed for
rate rate
actual output
Advantages
It is easier to calculate and understand.
It assures the employee a consistently high wage.
Disadvantages
Employees cannot go beyond the fixed hourly rate for the extra effort they
put in. In the example given above if the employee makes 280 units instead
of 240 units in a 40 hours week, the cost per unit would decrease even
further but all the savings would go to the benefit of the employer and none
would go to the employee.
The high wages might become the accepted wage level for normal working.
Management might need to keep checks on the productivity and efficiency
levels of the employees.
Cumulative
Cumulative avg.
no. of units Total Time Incremental time
time/unit
produced
Total time Time per unit
Hours Hours Hours Hours
1 100.0 (x1) 100
2 (70%) 70.0 (x2) 140 40 ÷1 40
4 (70%) 49.0 (x4) 196 56 ÷2 28
8 (70%) 34.3 (x8) 274.4 78.4 ÷4 19.6
Formula
The learning curve formula, is shown below,
b
Y = ax
Where Y = cumulative average time per unit to produce x units
a = the time taken for the first unit of output
x = the cumulative number of units produced (output)
b = the learning curve factor (i-e. log LR/log2)
LR = the learning rate as a decimal
Process Costing
1 COST OF REWORK
Section overview
Normal Rework
Abnormal Rework
Sometimes the loss incurred in processing is not scrapped but is subject to a further
rectification process, this extra processing cost is referred to as rework.
Rework might be performed on units that are either classified as normal or abnormal
loss:
Debit Credit
Process account X
Materials Account X
Direct Labour Account X
Introduction
Introduction
Many industries that utilize process costing have more than one processes through
which the units pass through before being turned into finished goods e.g. In oil refining
the crude oil passes through distillation, reforming, isomerization etc. before turning
into a final finished product.
As the production passes through different products, the finished goods output of one
process becomes the raw materials input of the next process, in addition to the units
from the previous process, new materials may also be added in the next process. In
order to separately distinguish the costs incurred in different processes or department
the cost from the previous process are labelled as “Direct Materials – Process 1”.
Example:
Description Process X Process Y
Materials Added (KGs) 10,000 2,000
Materials (Rs.) 30,000 3,000
Direct Wages (Rs.) 16,000 40,000
Production OH as % of Direct Wages 25% 30%
Normal Loss% 5% 5%
Materials Output (KGs) 9,500 10,925
Process 1 A/c
KGs Rs. KGs Rs.
Direct Normal
Materials 10,000 30,000 Loss 500
Output to
Direct Wages 16,000 Process 2 9,500 50,000
Production OH 4,000
10,000 50,000 10,000 50,000
Process 2 A/c
KGs Rs. KGs Rs.
Direct
Materials - Normal
process 1 9,500 50,000 Loss 575
Direct
Materials 2,000 3,000 Output 10,925 105,000
QUESTIONS
1 Question # 1
IB Company, a manufacturer and supplier of specialized equipment, is currently
engaged in producing the new equipment.
The company has been producing 150 units per week of new product; factory overhead
(all fixed) was Rs.12,000 per week. The following is a schedule of the pay rates of
three workers.
Customers have been calling in for additional units but management does not want to
work more than 40 hours per week. To motivate its workers, the company decided to
introduce an incentive wage plan. Under the plan, the workers would be paid a base
rate per hour, as shown in the following schedule, and a premium of Rs. 10 per unit
when the total number of units exceeds 150.
Employee Base Rate
Sami Rs.35
Ali Rs. 55
Pervaiz Rs. 45
As a result, production increased to 165 units. The supervisor studied the results and
considered the plan too costly; production has increased 10%, but the labour cost has
increased by approximately 23.2%. The supervisor requested permission to redesign
the plan in order to make the labour cost increase proportionate to the productivity
increase.
Required:
1. The Rupees amount of the 23.2% labour cost increase.
2. An opinion, supported by figure, as to whether the shop supervisor was correct in
assuming that the incentive wage plan was too costly, and a discussion of other
factors to be considered.
2 Question # 2
Standard production for an employee, Tayyab, in the Assembly department of
Moazzam Ltd. is 20 units per hour in an 8-hours day. The hourly wage rate is Rs.75.
Required:
Tayyab’s earning under each of the following condition
1. If an incentive plan is used, with the worker receiving 80% of the time saved each
day and record indicate:
2. If the 100 percent bonus plan is used and 880 units are produced in a 40-hour
week.
3. If an incentive plan is used, providing an hourly rate increase of 5% for increase of
5% for all hours worked each day that quota production is achieved and records
indicate:
3 Question # 3
Group bonus plan
Employees of Abdullah Enterprises work in groups of five plus a group leader.
Standard production for a group is 400 units for a 40-hour week. The workers are paid
Rs.60 an hour until production reaches 400 units then a bonus of Rs.120 per unit is
paid with Rs.100 being divided equally among the five workers and the remainder
passing to the group leader (who is also paid a weekly salary of Rs.3,000). Factory
overhead is Rs.60 per direct labour hour and includes the group leader's earnings.
The production record of a group for one week shows:
Hours worked Units produced
Monday 40 72
Tuesday 40 81
Wednesday 40 95
Thursday 40 102
Friday 40 102
Total 200 452
Required
1. The week’s earnings of the group (excluding the leader), the labour cost per unit,
the overhead cost per unit and the conversion cost per unit, based upon the above
data.
2. A schedule showing daily earnings of the group (excluding the leader), unit labour
cost, unit overhead cost, and the conversion cost per unit, assuming that the
company uses the group bonus plan.
ANSWERS
1 Answer # 1
1. Regular Work Week
Employee Hourly Work Total Base Pay Incentive Pay Total
Rate Week Labour (Base Rate x (Units Produced Labour
(Rs.) Cost Work Hours) x Incentive Cost
(Rs.) Premium) (Rs.)
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
Sami 60 40 hrs. 2,400 35x40 hrs. = 165 x 10 = 1,650 3,050
1,400
Ali 80 40 hrs. 3,200 55x40 hrs. = 165 x 10 = 1,650 3,850
2,200
Pervaiz 70 40 hrs. 2,800 45x40 hrs. = 165 x 10 = 1,650 3,450
1,800
2. To assess properly the effectiveness of the new plan, it is necessary to analyze its
effect on conversion costs and not just on direct labour cost. Although direct labour
cost unit may rise, this increase may be more than offset by distributing the
overhead over a large volume.
A comparison of the two pay plans and their effects on conversion cost per unit
shows:
Total Labour Total Overhea Total Unit
Labour Cost per factory d per Convers Convers
Cost unit overhea unit ion Cost ion Cost
(Rs.) (Rs.) ds (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Incentive wage 10,350 62.8 12,000 72.7 22,350 13.55 *
plan
Straight Hourly 8,400 56.0 12,000 80 20,400 13.60 **
Rate
Difference 6.8 (7.3)
(0.50)
2 Answer # 2
1.
3 Answer # 3
1.
*Bonus – C Rs.5,200
*Bonus
452 units produced
400 units standard
52 units above standard x Rs.100 workers share = Rs.5,200
2. ABDULLAH ENTERPRISES
Monday Tuesday Wednes Thursday Friday Total
day
Unit produced 72 81 95 102 102 452
Standard Hours 36 40.5 47.5 51 51 226
for unit produced
(W1)
Actual Hours 40 40 40 40 40 200
Bonus, Rs.60 x -- Rs.30 Rs.450 Rs.660 Rs.660 Rs.1,800
hours saved
Total earnings Rs.2,400 Rs.2,430 Rs.2,850 Rs.3,060 Rs.3,06 Rs.13,800
0
Unit Labour Cost Rs. 33.33 Rs.30 Rs.30 Rs.30 Rs.30 Rs.30.53
(W2)
Unit Factory Rs. 33.33 Rs.29.6 Rs.25.3 Rs.23.5 Rs.23.5 Rs. 26.55
overhead (W2)
Unit conversion Rs. 66.67 Rs.59.6 Rs.55.3 Rs. 53.5 Rs.53.5 Rs.57.1
cost
W1
400 units per 40 hours= 10 units per hour
10 units per hour / 5 workers = 2 units per hour per worker
72 units produced / 2 units per hour= 36 hours standard time
W2
If the group bonus is computed for the week rather than daily, the bonus would be
Rs.60 x 30 hours saved = Rs. 1,800. Then per unit labour cost is Rs. 30.53
(Rs. 13,800/ 452 units) and per unit overhead cost would be Rs. 26.55
(Rs. 12,000/452 units)
2019