CHP For Dwaraka
CHP For Dwaraka
February 2016
Prepared by
February 2016
Project Team:
Anurag Anthony, Bharti Sikri, Ilesh Dharek, Krunal
Parmar, Manvita Baradi, Meghna Malhotra, Munindra
Joshi, Prashant Panchal, Rujul Joshi and Santanu Das.
February 2016
Prepared by
Urban Management Centre
And
Urban Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
For more details, contact:
Manvita Baradi
A 202, GCP Business Centre
Opposite Memnagar Fire Station, Navrangpura
Ahmedabad – 380009; Gujarat
T: +91 79 26400306; E: [email protected]
The report has been prepared on the basis of information collected on the site visits and surveys
conducted in Dwarka and Bet Dwarka. The information collected informs the issues faced by the local
authorities and communities and on meeting made with the local authorities, mapping and
documentation of heritage structures in the area of study, data collected from the existing reports,
books, and articles already available for the area of research.
During the course of the study and report preparation we were provided with both written and verbal
information, we also supplemented the study with hand drawn sketches, archive maps and digital
drawings. Nothing has come to our attention to cause us to believe that the data or maps provided by
various sources are not true or not correct. We believe this information to be authentic and therefore
has not conducted an independent audit of the same.
Moreover, no investigations of the title of the tangible and intangible assets has been made.
Therefore, matters of a legal nature relating to the title of the assets have not been considered.
Nothing contained herein, to the contrary and in no event shall Urban Management Centre or Urban
Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd. or any of its staff be liable for any loss of profit or revenues and any
direct, incidental, consequential damages incurred by any user of this document. In case this
document is to be made available or disclosed to any third party, this disclaimer along with all the
limiting factors must be issued to the concerned party.
We would like to thank Ms. Poonam Madam, Member of Parliament, Jamnagar, for chairing the City
Level Advisory and Monitoring Committee (CLAMC) meeting and sharing her vision for development
of Dwarka and Bet Dwarka.
UMC acknowledges the support provided by Mr. S J Haider, IAS, Secretary, Department of Tourism,
Government of Gujarat (GoG); Mr. N Srivastav, Managing Director, Tourism Corporation of Gujarat
Limited (TCGL); Mr. Javed Waris, Manager, TCGL and other staff members of the TCGL team. We
also thank Mr. Rikhav Sanghvi for sharing presentation drawings of his project in Bet Dwarka.
We appreciate the inputs provided by Mr. Anil Patel, Secretary, Gujarat Pavitra Yatradham Vikas
Board (GPYVB) for lengthy discussions and deliberations on regional heritage and architecture.
We are grateful to Mr. H K Patel, IAS, District Collector and Magistrate, Devbhumi Dwarka District for
his guidance and support as the Chairperson of the CLAMC for Dwarka along with the team at the
District Collectorate including Mr. S N Joshi, Additional Collector and Administrator – Dwarkadhish
Devsthan Samiti; Mr. H Patel, Deputy Mamlatdar, Dwarka Division. We also thank the team at Dwarka
and Okha municipalities including Mr. M M Makwana, Former Chief Officer, Dwarka and Chief Officer,
Okha, Mr. Jayesh Patel, Chief Officer, Dwarka, Mr. Ramesh Kanjariya, Engineer, Dwarka and Mr. K G
Hindocha, Secretary, Dwarka Municipality for their support for the project.
We are highly thankful to Mr. Y S Ravat, (Former) Director of Archaeology and Museums, GoG; Mr.
Raval, Department of Museums, GoG for discussing and providing information about the city museum
in Dwarka. We also thank Mr. Maheshbhai Vyas, Bus Stand In-charge and Mr. R K Magra, Depot In-
charge, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC), Dwarka for providing information about
tourist inflow through GSRTC’s bus service. Likewise, we appreciate the inputs on tourist inflow
provided by Mr. Vidya Bhushan, Deputy Assistant to the Station Master, Dwarka Station, Indian
Railways.
We appreciate the support provided by Shristi Singh, Sanando Bhattacharjee and Shubham Katyayan
from MoUD’s Project Management Unit of HRIDAY. We are thankful for on-field orientation provided
by architects Prof. Rajan Raval, CEPT University and Mr. Ashish Parmar who have been residents of
Dwarka and Mithapur (near Bet Dwarka), respectively.
We would like to thank other individual and members of various government and private organisations
who have provided their inputs for the development of City HRIDAY Plan for Dwarka and developing
an overall understanding of the city.
3. Appraisal of Listed Heritage, Recognised Tourist and Cultural Assets of the City .............. 11
3.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 11
3.1.1. Listing of heritage structures in Dwarka ............................................................................... 11
3.1.2. Listing of heritage structures in Bet Dwarka ........................................................................ 18
3.1.3. Protected monuments in Dwarka and Bet Dwarka ............................................................. 19
3.2. Appraisal of Tangible Assets .......................................................................................................... 25
3.3. Appraisal of Intangible Heritage ..................................................................................................... 27
3.4. Mapping of the Assets ..................................................................................................................... 29
3.5. About the existing and the past conservation initiatives in Dwarka .......................................... 32
3.5.1. Repair works carried out by ASI ............................................................................................ 32
3.5.2. Development by Devsthan Samiti, Dwarkadhish Temple .................................................. 32
3.5.3. Projects undertaken by TCGL and GPYVB ......................................................................... 33
3.5.4. Development of a City Museum by Department of Museums, GoG ................................ 34
3.5.5. Conservation by Dwarka Municipality ................................................................................... 34
3.5.6. Conservation by private owners and trusts .......................................................................... 35
List of Maps
Map 1 Location map for Dwarka and Bet Dwarka .......................................................................................... 2
Map 2 Map of Baroda State ............................................................................................................................... 3
Map 3 Historic map of Bet Dwarka locating various structures in the city and the river............................ 4
Map.4 Regional Setting of Dwarka and Bet Dwarka ...................................................................................... 5
Map 5 Location of Marine national Park ........................................................................................................... 7
Map.6 Base map of Dwarka ............................................................................................................................... 8
Map 7 Tourist destinations in Dwarka ............................................................................................................. 10
Map 8 Location of ASI protected structures in Dwarka ................................................................................ 11
Map 9 Heritage structures identified by UMC through a primary survey in Dwarka ................................ 12
Map 10 Heritage structures identified by UMC through a primary survey in Bet Dwarka ....................... 18
Map 11 Site location for archaeological findings ........................................................................................... 20
Map 12 Mapping of heritage structures in Dwarka ....................................................................................... 30
Map 13 Mapping of Heritage structures in Bet Dwarka................................................................................ 31
Map 14 Proposed land use plan, Second Revised Development Plan 2018, Dwarka ............................ 36
Map 15 Location of Sub zones in Dwarka as per heritage byelaws ........................................................... 42
Map 16 Integrated tourism circuit Dwarka-Shivrajpur-Bet Dwarka-Nageshwar/ Gopi-Talav.................. 47
Map 17 Location of major parking and undesignated paring areas in Dwarka ........................................ 56
Map 18 Location of public conveniences in Dwarka ..................................................................................... 58
Map 19 Location of Public Conveniences in Bet Dwarka ............................................................................ 58
Map 20 Location of street furniture, signage in Dwarka and Bet Dwarka ................................................. 59
Map 21 Public Gathering Spaces across Dwarka ......................................................................................... 62
Map 22 Prohibited and regulated zones around Dwarkadhish Group of Temples .................................. 65
Map 23 Heritage structures identified by UMC .............................................................................................. 66
Map 24 Major Tourist Destinations in Dwarka ............................................................................................... 67
Map 25 Public conveniences in Dwarka ......................................................................................................... 68
Map 26 Location of SWM containers in Dwarka ........................................................................................... 69
Under this scheme a City HRIDAY Plan (CHP) will be prepared for each city. The purpose of
the CHP is to create a sustainable Civic Infrastructure Development Plan (CIDP) for areas
around tangible heritage assets (identified/ approved by the Ministry of Culture, Government
of India and State Governments) by identifying gaps through infrastructure need assessment
for physical infrastructure (water supply, sanitation, drainage, waste management, approach
roads, footpaths, street lights, tourist conveniences, electricity wiring, landscaping etc.) as
per locally applicable standards/norms/bye-laws.
MoUD has appointed Urban Management Centre (UMC) in consortium with Urban
Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd. as the HRIDAY City Anchor (HCA) for Dwarka, Gujarat.
Along with Dwarka, Bet Dwarka – an island around 30 km from away is an integral part of
the heritage, religious and socio-cultural significance. As a part of the HRIDAY guidelines
and the agreed terms of reference for the HCA, UMC conducted an assessment of the
existing situation in both Dwarka and Bet Dwarka (administratively a part of Okha
Municipality). Based on the assessment, overall vision for development of Dwarka has been
developed in consultation with various stakeholders and a shelf of projects has been created
which should be taken up for implementation. This report further estimates the investment
requirements and role of various stakeholders. This report provides the operation and
maintenance mechanisms suitable for the projects proposed in Dwarka.
Dwarka houses one of the oldest marine archaeological sites in the country. During marine
explorations, archaeological remains dating 2500 to 1500 BCE were discovered at the
mouth of the Gomti River. The oldest excavations found in the region belong to the Harappa
period, hinting that the site was probably a trading dockyard during the Indus Valley
Civilisation. Dwarka also houses a large number of temples dating back from 12th to15th
century CE. Dwarka has several built structures related to water bodies in the form of kunds,
sarovars and ghats.
Dwarka is known for its rich culture that exists in form of people, practices and places where
traditional art forms exist. The people in Dwarka and its surroundings make hand
embroidered clothing products in a local style named as Rayka art.
Dwarka is one of the most important religious place and pilgrim centre for Hindus.
Mythological the legendary city of Dwarka is believed to have been established by Lord
Sri Krishna after he left Mathura. Dwarka is one of the seven sacred cities of India as
1 Chardham consists of 4 sacred Hindu pilgrimage centres – one in north, south, east and western parts of India.
The city has its pilgrimage importance due to the old Dwarkadhish Temple built in 6th - 7th
century CE. The city was under the Hindu rulers till 11th century CE. It was in the year
1241 CE when Mohammad Shah attacked Dwarka. The British ruled in the region in the
late 17th century CE when Okha was a thriving port for trade between India and other
parts of the world (Rao, 1999).
The territory of Okha Mandal of which Dwarka is headquarters was handed over in the
year 1817 CE by the British to the Gaekwad Rulers of Vadodara. This remained in their
possession till the merger of the erstwhile Baroda State with the Republic of India in the
year 1949 CE. It was included in Jamnagar district in 1959 (Government of Gujarat,
1970). The disjointed teritory of the Gaekwad from 1850 to 1947 is indicated in Map 2.
Bet Dwarka
Bet Dwarka is an island 3 km off the coast of Okha city. The island is a pilgrim centre with
Dwarkadhish Temple as the major centre of attraction with Shankhodhar, Rattan and
Ranchhod Lake surrounding the temple. Bet Dwarka houses the Dwarkadhish Haveli
associated as a pleasure residence of Lord Krishna. It is also believed that the submerged
remains of the mythological Dwarka city lies along the coast of the present day Bet Dwarka.
Bet Dwarka is rich in marine resources such as the conch shell, which possibly attracted
the early man to inhabit this island. Early historic settlement remains have been located
on the island which may be dated back to 3rd century BCE on the basis of a potsherd
inscribed with 'Nandakasa' in the Mauryan Brahmi script. Onshore and offshore
As per mythological beliefs, Bet Dwarka was leisure place of Lord Krishna. Shankhodhar
(another name for the island) is mentioned for the first time in Bhagwatapurana and
Skanda purana – Dvarkamahatmya. The temple of Adinarayana at Bet Dwarka is
believed to have been built on the Buddhist stupa mound but this cannot be verified now.
Near to the temple of Adinarayana is a cave in dilapidated condition. It might have been
a Buddhist cave as studied by its architecture (Rao, 1999).
Map 3 Historic map of Bet Dwarka locating various structures in the city and the river
Dwarka is in close proximity with the International Naval Border between India and
Pakistan and hence, is in strategically important geo-political region for India. The city
also sites INS Dwarka – a forward outpost of the Indian Navy (Indian Navy, 2016),
examining the Okha Port and an Indian Air force base in Jamnagar – around 130 km
Roadways: State Highway 6A and district roads link Dwarka to the other cities and
villages of Gujarat. There are around 80 departures of Gujarat State Road Transport
Corporation (GSRTC) buses daily from the bus stand at Dwarka (Vyas & Magra, 2015).
Railways: Dwarka is connected to the rest of the country through a broad gauge railway
line. The Dwarka Railway Station is located 1.5 km from the main city. The nearest
station to visit Bet Dwarka is Okha located 12 km away from Bet Dwarka.
Waterways: Being an island, Bet Dwarka can only be accessed via the waterways.
There are private boats that carry visitors from Okha port to Bet Dwarka.
Physiography: The entire region of Dwarka has a rock bed of calcareous sandstone. The
stone available is used for construction due to its ease in dressing and carving. The city has
yellow limestone and earthy, marshy or clayey beds, partly gypsum with iron stained harder
bands (Kulkarni, 1985) which is used in the construction of historic buildings in Dwarka and
Bet Dwarka. Most of the land in Dwarka city and its surroundings are less fertile due to high
soil salinity. The region of Okha Mandal (including both Dwarka and Bet- Dwarka) come
under Seismic Zone –IV. The coastal belt of Dwarka and Bet Dwarka attracts dynamic
changes throughout the year in its marine and micro climate. Dwarka has regular changes in
currents which makes it prone to high tides and attracts various marine lives to the shore.
The complete belt lives up with establishment of corals and blue water between October and
January every year.
Climate: Dwarka has a subtropical desert/ low-latitude arid hot climate. The city is prone to
cyclones and high wind currents due to its geographic location. The average annual rainfall
is 310 millimetres, spread over a rainy period of 29 days with rainfall limited to the months of
June to September; the average maximum temperature is 31°C and an average minimum
temperature is 15°C .The average annual relative humidity is high throughout the year with
72 to 80 percent.
Colourful coral reefs, mangrove swamp forests, mudflats etc. form the landscape of the
shallow waters of the Marine National Park. These plants prevent the land based predators
from penetrating and also provide shelter to the birds for nesting and roosting purposes.
During the monsoon season, 30 different species of migratory birds make their home
among the mangrove forests. This marine national park is of great significance in terms
of its bio diversity both flora and fauna.
2.5. Administration
Devbhumi Dwarka is one of the 29 districts of Gujarat and is divided into 2 sub divisions –
Dwarka and Khambhaliya. Dwarka is further sub-divided in Kalyanpur and Dwarka Talukas
and Khambhaliya Sub Division is divided into Khambhaliya and Bhanvad Talukas. Dwarka
Municipality and Okha Municipality (including Bet Dwarka Island) come under the Dwarka
Sub Division (Government of Gujarat, 2016).
Dwarka is a C class municipality whereas Bet Dwarka is one of the administrative zones of
the neighbouring C class Okha Municipality. These municipalities provide services as
mandated under the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963. The municipalities are guided by
mayors and a body of elected councillors from each of the wards while the executive wings
headed by the chief officers oversee implementation of projects and O&M.
The provision of capital infrastructure for water supply and Sewerage is supported by the
Gujarat State Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GWSSB). The electricity supply is
provided by the Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB).
Another major economic activity for the people in Dwarka is fishing. There exists a small
settlement of fishermen on the fringes of the city near Rupen Bandar who are involved in
the fish export who are involved in the fish export. The other activity on which the
economy of the town is based is done by the Ahir community, the descendants of the
Yadavas and are traditionally gwalas - involved in cow herding and agriculture. The
brahmins in Dwarka earn their livelihood through performing religious rituals at the Gomti
Ghats, Dwarkadhish temple and other places of worship.
A large part of the population on Bet Dwarka is engaged in fishing and other tertiary
activities related to tourism. A major part of the community of Bet Dwarka is involved in
transportation of tourists and goods from Okha jetty to Bet Dwarka jetty as it is the only
mode of transport available.
Most visitors to Dwarka visit nearby places of religious importance such as Bet Dwarka,
Nageshwar which sites a temple of Lord Shiva, Miyani which sites the temple of Shri
Harsiddhi Mata, Mul Dwarka and Sudama temple.
As per the data from the Tourist Footfall Information System (TFIS) published by the
Tourism Corporation of Gujarat Ltd. there are approximately 18 to 19 lakh visitors who
come to Dwarka annually and as per the circuit mentioned above, almost 90% of visitors
coming to Dwarka visit Bet Dwarka depending upon the weather conditions at a given
time of visit. The flow of tourists varies seasonally as per the Hindu calendar. The most
important months, during which Dwarka is flooded with pilgrims are July, August,
October, November and December, being Shravan Mahina, Janmashtami and Diwali
successively. The following statistics show the tourist footfall data of Dwarka as
registered in the 2013-2014.
Dwarka and Bet Dwarka have historical, architectural, and religious significance. It is
important to include both places in the preparation of the City HRIDAY plan with a
horizon of 20 years span. Gujarat Industrial and Technical Consultancy Organisation (GITCO)
defines tourists as those who spend atleast one night at a given destination, whereas
visitors as those who visit the destination but do not stay overnight.
Source: Base map – Google Earth; Overlay – UMC (left); UMC (right)
3. Sindhu Sadan
The building historically was a palace constructed by Seth Shri Purshottam Vishram Mavaji
in 1904 CE. The palace is located near the Siddhnath Mahadev Temple on the way to
Gayatri Mandir and presently houses a primary school. The palace is one of the finest
building in its architecture and planning. The structure has a mix of colonial and traditional
architectural elements. The building has a garden and a paved court in front of it.
4. Vegetable market
The building is situated at prominent junction in the city. The building is a colonial structure
built by Sayaji Rao Gaekwad in the year 1818 CE. The building is rectangular in plan with a
sloping roof supported on a wooden truss and the walls are constructed using a local stone
called the Bela Stone. The building has colonial architectural elements with oriel windows
and flying wings on the west side. Inside the structure, platforms were designed as
5. Jampar Ni Haveli
The haveli is situated near the Vegetable Market Square towards Samudra Narayan Temple.
The haveli was constructed by Jam Vibhaji in 1890 CE. The haveli houses a Krishna
Temple, other smaller temples of Ganesh and Hanuman, and rooms use as residences. The
haveli a rectangular plan type with Krishna temple. The building is constructed in traditional
architectural style with elements including jharokhas and motifs of Hindu Gods.
Dwarka has many more structures of religious, historic and architectural significance. Details
of other structures has been provided in Annexure 2.
Bet Dwarka has other structures of religious significance including Jain temples, Shri
Keshavraiji Temple and Dargah of Sharif Hazrat Ruksan Shah Pir. In addition to temples
and the dargah, the island has many lakes, some of which are of heritage significance
where religious rituals are performed by the pilgrims.
Map 10 Heritage structures identified by UMC through a primary survey in Bet Dwarka
Archaeological Significance
Dwarka city has significant inland as well as marine archaeological remains. Research and
excavation in and around Dwarka has revealed many layers of history. The existing Dwarka
city is believed to be the 7th habited city on that site. Remains of other six cities have been
found. Excavations in front of the temple complex have confirmed this. Remains were found
right from the depth of 3 feet (Gaur, Tripati, & Tripati, 2005).
The marine archaeological excavations give a scope for scuba diving and under water
tourism activities at certain sections of the area, keeping in mind it does not impact the
marine life.
Architectural Significance
This temple of Dwarkadhish is ornate, exquisite, majestic and one of the most imposing
structures of Hindu architecture in Gujarat. Eighty-four feet long multi-coloured flag
decorated with the symbols of the sun and moon waves from the temple dome
(Dwarkadhish Temple, 2016).
The temple when measured on the plan is 27.35 by 21.3 m. The mandapa of the temple
made up of 60 pillars rises to five storeys and is open on all sides. The temple has a high
conical shikhara. The pyramidal roof of the mandapa is adorned with a series of tiny bell
The temple complex has two main gates for entrance. The one on the southern side is
known as ‘Swargadwar’ and is accessible by 56 steps from Gomti River. The northern
gate is known as ‘Mokshadwar’. This entrance leads to the main market.
Figure 14 Dwarkadhish temple is located at the axis of Gomti River and Sea
The gigantic built character of the monument, the axis of the temple complex and
articulation of building elements are features that make the monument special and
architecturally significant. These features can be preserved and enhanced only by
regulating the surrounding areas so that the axis is maintained of visibility of monument is
increased.
Socio-Cultural Significance
Being the seat of the great Lord Krishna, the temple and the city as such holds a great
value to the Hindu religion. In the case of Dwarka, the city witnesses a total of 18 lakh
visitors annually and a high flow of tourists on more than 215 days per year.
During festivals, there are more than 45,000 visitors per day. This adds to the existing
strain on municipal infrastructure. The temple is open to devotees from 0630 hours to
1300 hours and from 1700 hours to 2130 hours everyday. During this time various rituals
like uthhapan, arti, sringar, bhog, darshan, etc. take place (Shree Dwarkadhish Mandir
Devasthan Samiti, 2015). In the temple complex people can be observed singing
devotional songs in groups, dancing the traditional garba, chanting, distributing prasad
and performing religious rituals.
b. Rukshmani Temple
This Rukshmani Temple is dedicated to Rukshmani, the wife of Krishna. According to a
mythological legend, she was cursed by a saint that she would be away from her
husband. It is believed that due to the curse, the temple dedicated to her too was
constructed outside the city of Dwarka – 2 km away from Dwarkadhish Temple. As per
archaeological findings, the temple was built in 6th century BCE. It comprises of
garbhagriha measuring 12 x 12 feet, an agudmandapa and a shringarchowki. Its
shikhara rises to a height of 32 feet.
c. Kshatrapa Inscriptions
During digging of a lake, an inscription was found in 1874 CE in Mulvasar village,
situated around 12 km away from Dwarka. The inscription in original Brahmilipi – an
ancient script which appeared in India in the 5th century BCE (Brahmi, 2012). This is
currently kept in the public library building of Dwarka (Gokani, 1973).
A detailed assessment of the tangible heritage assets has been undertaken in this section.
The first part of this section appraises the protected assets while the second part appraises
the unprotected heritage.
The following sections present a preliminary analysis of the heritage structures identified by
UMC in Dwarka and Bet Dwarka. A total of 44 structures have been identified. The analysis
is conducted based on parameters such as significance, architectural style, period of
construction, condition of the structure, ownership & occupancy of the building and use of
the building.
Heritage significance
The significance of the structure defines it heritage character. While identifying heritage
structures in Dwarka and Bet Dwarka, UMC documented their significance as architectural,
historic, archaeological, socio cultural and environmental. Out of a total 44 structures, 29
have architectural significance – in many cases in addition to religious and historical
significance. Eighteen structures were found to have religious significance along with
historical and socio-cultural significance.
Condition of building
Heritage sites and structures in Dwarka and Bet Dwarka are under threat due to natural
deterioration. There are temples, mosques and water bodies lying in a dilapidated condition.
Around 11 percent structures are under serious threat of deterioration. These heritage
structures require immediate repair and restoration to avoid their complete loss. More than
50 percent of the listed heritage structures in Dwarka and Bet Dwarka show some signs of
deterioration due to ageing, water seepage, vandalism, neglect and urban pressure.
The religious activities are practiced by the local and the visiting population and are assisted
by the local priests who perform puja (prayers), aartis (songs of worship) and other
ceremonies at the temples and the Gomti Ghat. These activities are performed many times
daily at fixed times. There is Mangala Aarti in the morning followed by Abhishek, Snan Bhog,
Aarti Bhog, Aarti Darshan, Madhyanh Bhog, Raj Bhog and Shayan Aarti in the night. Large
crowds emerge at theses aartis and is managed by the Devasthan Samiti.
Procession Paths
The visitors in the city walk along the historic procession paths/ pilgrim routes leading to the
Dwarkadhish temple and connecting Kaklash Kund and Rukshmani Temple. The procession
path is dotted with the historic temples, shrines and residences – many of which are
historically significant. These paths have become the main arteries of the old core of Dwarka
and face commercial pressure. The city needs a conservation plan for these procession
paths to regulate development, provide street furniture and other infrastructure facilities.
There are an estimated 300 to 350 households practicing Rayka art in Dwarka and an
NGO procures, markets and sells the products. The work is majorly practiced by the
women using natural colors only, cotton threads and mirrors. Use of Ryka art is declining
and fewer families are now practicing it. The growth of this small scale home based art is
small and profits are shared between the artisans and the NGO. The government should
promote the art by facilitating sale of products beyond Dwarka and by initiating training of
artisans.
Figure 21 Rituals at Gomti Ghat (left); Procession through the streets of Dwarka (right)
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation’s (UNESCO) Convention for
the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage is an important tool to identify, document
and promote intangible heritage. The convention identifies the following as manifestation of
intangible cultural heritage (UNESCO, 2003)
a) Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible
cultural heritage
Intangible heritage identified in Dwarka includes most of the above manifestations. The
convention also recommends the following
i. Adopt a general policy integrating the safeguarding of such heritage into planning
programmes
ii. Foster scientific, technical and artistic studies to safeguard the intangible cultural
heritage
iii. Create or strengthen institutions for training in the management, promotion
iv. Improve access to the intangible cultural heritage while respecting customary
practices
v. Document intangible cultural heritage and facilitate their access
vi. Create awareness about the intangible heritage
vii. Build capacity of artisans
As the HCA, we too recommend undertaking the above activities for conservation of the
intangible heritage.
The works done by TCGL and GPYVB have provided better facilities for the visitors and
residents of Dwarka. A few components of some of the projects have not shown due
consideration to the heritage conservation principles. For example, while redeveloping
Kaklash Kund, TCGL and GPYVB have cladded the steps of the tank with sand stone.
However, at several original vertical surfaces of the steps, idols were carved. The
cladding appears to be insensitive towards the carvings.
It was in year December 1975, the first DP for Dwarka was published on January 21, 1976
by the then Gujarat Housing and Urban Development Department under the Gujarat Town
Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 (INTACH & Urban Management Centre, 2012).
The first revision of the DP was published in the year 1990 by the Town Planning and
Valuation Department (TPVD), Rajkot. The Second Revision of the DP was prepared by
TPVD, Jamnagar in the year 1999. However, the Second Revised DP 2018 along with
General Development Control Regulation (GDCR) was published in the year 2009.
Map 14 Proposed land use plan, Second Revised Development Plan 2018, Dwarka
Source: (દ્વારકાની બીજી પુનરાવર્તિત ર્વકાસ યોજના 2018 (Dwarka Second Revised Development Plan 2018), 1999)
As per the Second Revised DP 2018, at present only 8.41 percent of the total DP area (4207
hectare) was developed. This is likely to increase up to 27.34 percent by the year 2018.
The Second Revised DP shows no consideration for improvements in the high density area,
there is lack of the basic infrastructure, lack of recreational space and accommodation in the
gamtal are the major issues in the planned development.
Within the developed area (3.54 sqkm), 53 percent is covered by residential and commercial
activities. About 10 percent is meant for public and semi-public spaces and there are no
recreational spaces as per the DP.
The DP proposes to increase in residential area from 180 ha to 410 ha by the year 2018.
The DP proposes to increase the industrial area three times from the existing 35 ha. Dwarka
is a hub for the commercial activities for the surroundings villages and houses many
commercial establishments including hotels, restaurants and markets. The DP fails to
address rapid increase in commercial area and indicates zero commercial land use in the
city. We assume that since as per the GDCR, it is permitted to build hotels and restaurants
in the residential zones and hence, no separate land use is reserved for the same.
As per the development plan 2018 the vacant land is converted to the recreational use.
Recreational developments are proposed in Dwarka including development of Panchkui
Island. The DP proposes recreational area of more than 400 ha in the city by 2018.
As of January 2016, Dwarka has not submitted an application to seek funds under this
scheme.
In addition to the above schemes, potential sources of funding may include Chardham
Connectivity Project, Zila Ayojan Grant (District Planning Grant), MP/ MLA funds, corporate
social responsibility (CSR) through private companies and public sector undertakings (PSU)
and public private partnership (PPP).
Heritage byelaws for Prohibited and Regulated Areas and Sub Zones
The exact delineation of the prohibited and regulated zone is done through a total station
survey and photographic documentation. In most of the study area the coastal
regulations and the local GDCR are applied along with the heritage bye-laws (Ministry of
Environment and Forests, 2011). Further, sub-zones are identified for areas with special
features. These sub zones were identified on the basis of their architectural, historic,
cultural and religious importance. These include the following:
Subzone 1: Gomti Ghat
Subzone 2: The Kaklash Kund
Subzone 3: Panchkui Island
Source: (Heritage Byelaws for the prohibited and Regulated areas of Dwarkadhish Group of Temples, 2012)
Heritage bye-laws for both prohibited and regulated zones have been prepared for i)
individual building level elements, ii) building level utilities and iii) public areas,
infrastructure and other general elements. For categories (i) and (ii) into three types of
development activity namely new construction of buildings, expansions/ modifications of
existing buildings and repair/ renovation of existing buildings. Similarly, byelaws have
been framed for public works as well.
Project
S. No. Project Title Status cost (INR in Funding source Remarks
lakh)
Package 1:
Traffic &
crowd Construction
management, completed.
approach Hand-over
1,668
road to
development, municipality
parking plots is pending
and public
utilities
Package 2:
New Gomti
Gujarat
Ghat,
PavitraYatradham
Destination parikrama
Vikas Board
Development path All packages have
Construction (GPYVB);
and including been either
1 completed. Implementation
Infrastructure mandir completed or are
Site handed 1,996 by Tourism
Improvement, parisar, nearing completion.
over to Corporation of
Dwarka pedestrian
municipality. Gujarat Limited
pathways,
(TCGL)
repairing and
restoration of
Old Gomti
Ghat
Package 3:
Beach front
development
Construction
from
nearing 1,753
Samudra
completion.
Narayan to
Gayatri
Shakti Pith
TCGL floated a
tender for this
works. UMC
Development of Laser Show in Under
11 2,450 TCGL reviewed the tender
River Gomti planning
document &
proposal submitted
by Multimedia Pvt.
From the above list of projects, UMC procured DPRs/ project proposals for projects (S. No.
5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 in the above table). Out of the three shortlisted projects, in discussion with
NIUA, UMC evaluated the DPR of Development of Laser Show in River Gomti project and
provided recommendations to improve the same. However, during the review meeting
conducted on June 26, 2015, the JS, MoUD opined that this project was not an eligible
project and some other project should be evaluated under HRIDAY.
Based on the recommendation of the JS, MoUD, UMC subsequently evaluated the project
titled ‘Integrated development of Dwarka-Bet Dwarka-Nageshwar phase -II as a mega tourist
circuit’ proposed by TCGL. The project envisages improving tourist infrastructure such as
pedestrian pathway, information signage, lighting, public conveniences, street furniture,
dustbins and parking facilities at selected site for visitors to Bet Dwarka Island and Gopi
Talav.
The scope also includes operations, maintenance and repair of the built facilities through
private contractors. The proposal indicates that TCGL will bear the cost of all operations and
maintenance costs, including annual repair of the assets created. The proposal further states
that TCGL will bear all expenditure on recruitment, training and salary of staff employed for
operation of the projects. TCGL will also submit quarterly detailed physical and financial
progress report of the project to Ministry of Tourism (MoT), GoI.
The project is a tourism circuit development including five locations i) Dwarka, ii) Bet
Dwarka, iii) Gopi Talav, iv) Nageshwar and v) Shivrajpur. The total budget for the project is
INR 21.81 crore as per the proposal submitted by TCGL.
The proposed budget includes development of facilities at Bet Dwarka and Gopi-Talav only.
Although not explicitly explained in the proposal, TCGL explained that facilities development
at Dwarka and Shivrajpur can be funded under other available schemes/ initiatives, and
hence, has been excluded from the proposal for HRIDAY. Development works at Nageshwar
are ongoing and hence, have been excluded from the proposal for HRIDAY. A separate
report on evaluation of this DPR has been submitted by UMC.
Discussions with some of the key stakeholders have been summarised below:
Figure 30 First CLAMC Meeting on Sep 11, 2015, Devbhumi Dwarka District
During discussions with our team, the District Collector emphasised on improving the quality
of services for visitors and residents of the city. The district administration expressed
concerns over O&M of the past and ongoing development projects by TCGL and GPYVB.
According to the District Collector, the success or failure of the projects is dependent on the
capacity of the agency responsible for O&M of these projects – currently the Dwarka
Municipality. He opined that Dwarka Municipality is not technically and financially capable of
O&M of these projects and suggested formulation of a special purpose vehicle (SPV) on the
lines of Sabarmati Riverfront Development Corporation Limited (SRFDCL). He also
emphasised on the need for regular and meaningful coordination among the stakeholders,
especially, TCGL, GPYVB, ASI and Dwarka Municipality. He also expressed concern over
the safety and security of the Dwarkadhish temple and visitors.
UMC interacted with Okha and Dwarka municipalities on several occasions. Both
municipalities provided all relevant data for the CHP preparation. Both ULBs expressed
issues faced by the city during the festivals and highlighted the need to improve urban civic
infrastructure. The major issues faced by them are lack of financial and technical resources
to operate and maintain the assets built by TCGL and GPYVB. Okha Municipality expressed
the desire to develop facilities along the beaches and places of religious importance.
UMC also consulted operators of hotels and dharmashalas to discuss tourist preferences in
Dwarka and the issues faced by them to cater to tourists’ needs. Likewise, the team
consulted operators of homestays (formed under the newly drafted homestay policy) to
understand their business needs. The other discussions were held with local shopkeepers in
and around the heritage areas to understand the challenges faced by them including
congestion in the old core, absence of pedestrian facilities (which they feel will boost their
business) and poor condition of most of the roads due to laying of water supply and sewer
lines.
Population projections
As the city is growing substantially, the local population which is around 38,000 may have a
decadal growth as follows (as per arithmetic progression method).
The table suggests that the floating population may be more than 10 times the resident
population of the city. It warrants significant investments in capital and O&M works for civic
infrastructure projects in the city.
This section assesses the existing status of basic urban infrastructure in Dwarka and
presents the existing and project gaps for a period of 25 years. The assessment is done on
the basis of projections of the resident and floating population. The city’s needs may be
completely different from the projections due to fast changing technology, visitor
preferences, city governance models, financial health of civic bodies and overall
environmental scenario. Although, it is difficult to project this demand to a very high level of
Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GWSSB) have allocated 8 MLD of water for
the entire Okha-Mandal region, out of which 3.06 MLD is reserved for Dwarka city.
Dwarka Municipality is majorly dependent on water produced through surface water
sources. On an average only 2 MLD is supplied throughout the year as only 42 percent
properties are connected to the piped network while a large number of the remaining
properties rely on bore wells (Service Level Benchmarking in Water and Sanitation - data
collected under Performance Assessment System (PAS) Project, 2014-15).
Figure 31 Water supply in Dwarka
The water sourced from Sani Dam is
treated at Kalyanpur water treatment
plant (WTP) and water from Mayasar
Lake and Bhimgaja Lake are treated at
Town Gate Head Works and Station
Zone Head Works, respectively.
Narmada canal is additional source of water for Dwarka. The water is supplied through
GWSSB pipeline, which carries Narmada water collected at Kalyanpur.
Bet Dwarka is one of the administrative zones of Okha Municipality. At present the
scheme for piped water supply is under preparation for Okha Municipality, wherein Bet
Dwarka is also included.
Gap analysis
Dwarka is a tourist destination and receives large number of visitors on a daily basis. Based
on the data provided by GITCO through its Tourist Flow Information System (TFIS), around
Only 66 percent of households have household level water supply connection in Dwarka.
Areas outside the gamtal in Dwarka do not have municipal piped water supply and rely
on private bore wells and public stand posts. Dwarka Municipality supplies an average of
47 lpcd water to its citizens against the norm of 135 lpcd. As per the service level
benchmarking (SLB), Dwarka municipal water supply has non-revenue water of 20
percent due to leakages in the distribution system.
Through the UIDSSMT, an underground sewerage network is being laid in the city. As
per the DPR for sewerage, a sewage treatment plant (STP) of 9 MLD capacity would be
constructed in Dwarka. Based on the water supply, capacity of the STP is sufficient till
the year 2014 (Urban Management Centre, 2015).
Gap analysis
Table 7 Gap analysis for Sewage Network
Service / Existing Existing Existing Cumulative Gaps
Units
Infrastructure Situation Demand Gap 2021 2031 2041
Capacity of waste MLD
- 4.63 4.63 6.22 7.19 8.32
water treatment plant .
No. of waste water
No. - 14,254 14,254 21,772 34,302 46,832
connection
Properties with toilet No. 7,920 14,254 6,334 8,208 21,888 35,568
Source: (Urban Management Centre, 2015)
Moreover, the reconnaissance survey identifies the lack of availability of pubic waste
collection bins across strategic locations in the city. As people serve food to cows and
other stray animals, this leads to food waste scattered all across the city.
The city claims to collect 90 percent of the waste generated daily. However, a detailed
assessment suggests otherwise. The ULB currently has 3 door-to-door collection
vehicles against the present demand of 5 vehicles. The ULB has placed more than 20
secondary collection bins in the city but has only 2 dumper placers to empty them. This
number although seems adequate but as many bins are places in the old core, the
dumper placers are not able to lift the containers regularly. The ULB has around 110
street sweepers against the required 120.
Gap analysis
Table 8 Gap analysis for solid waste management
Existing Existing Existing Cumulative Gaps
Service / Infrastructure Units Situation Demand Gap 2021 2031 2041
Generation of waste MT/month 610 674 780 902
Collection of MSW MT/month 560 610 50 61 70 81
No. of vehicles (mini vans) No. 3 5 2 5 6 7
No. of secondary collection
No. 2 2 0 1 2 4
bin emptying vehicle
Capacity of processing
MT 225 560 335 396 405 416
plant
Capacity of scientific land-
MT 0 560 560 621 630 641
fill site
No. of sweepers No. 110 120 10 15 20 25
Source: (Urban Management Centre, 2015)
6.2.4. Transportation
There is no municipal urban transport service in the city. The intermediate public
transport (IPT) such as auto rickshaws and jeeps are privately operated. For regional
transport, Gujarat State Regional Transport Corporation (GSRTC) operates buses from
its bus stand. On an average, there are 80 bus departures from the GSRTC bus stand
daily with additional 10 departures during festivals. In addition to this, there are number
of regional private transport agencies having their offices and stops within the city. There
are no bus stop facilities for IPT or for private buses. The city needs a local urban
transport service, preferably with smaller sized vehicles due to narrow width of the
streets in the old core.
Due to increase in the tourist footfall during festivals, undesignated parking creates
overcrowding and disturbance in the traffic movement. The unauthorized parking takes
place around the following places.
- in front of Lords hotel
- along Gomti Ghat
- on the road from Gomti Ghat towards Dwarkadhish temple
The capacity for the number of vehicles as per the area available and type of vehicle is
calculated in the following table.
Gaps analysis
An integrated street improvement project needs to be implemented wherein all the above
mentioned pedestrian facilities including footpaths, signage, garbage bins, pause
spaces, street furniture etc. are planned along with the designated pedestrian paths.
There is a need to promote the non-motorized infrastructure in the city to the entire
tourist destination and the pilgrim site.
Gap Analysis
There are inadequate number of public conveniences located in and around the city for the
local residents and the visiting population. The upkeep of most of the facilities is very poor,
to the extent that many have been rendered unusable. There is no proper signage and
accessibility of the existing toilets is very poor. There is a need of more public toilets in and
around the significant religious, heritage and tourist sites.
b. Street furniture
Street furniture in Dwarka caters to the local people of the city and the floating population
in the town. The street furniture includes benches, signage, community information kiosk,
waste / recycling receptacles and other urban installations. The street furniture in Dwarka
has improved as per the works carried out by agencies as a part of development projects
in Dwarka.
There are a variety of street benches, dumping bins and information display hoardings in
Dwarka. Public benches are made of concrete and iron, and appear bulky. Seating and
benches at all the locations are commissioned by various agencies without standard
designs and is incongruent with the heritage character of the historic core.
Gap analysis
There is a lack of dustbins and people tend to litter the streets. The need is to
incorporate a specific urban design guideline or toolkit which maintains the heritage
character of the area. The number of installations should be decided during micro-
design/ area plans for differetnt pockets of the city.
Gap analysis
There are inadequate open sitting spaces around the temple premises for rest and
recreation of people after the temple ceremonies. There are inadequate signage and
information boards around pilgrim and heritage sites. There are no signage for orienting
people towards public conveniences. While the prayers are performed in the temple, a
large crowd also gathers around the Dwarkadhish Temple. Large screens could be
installed in these congregational spaces to broadcast the prayers live.
Gaps analysis
There are large gatherings spaces for the visitors, the places are used as the places of
temporary accommodation during the peak seasons. These are large spaces and are
Infrastructure Projects
1. Development of Vegetable Market square
2. Development of forecourt of Dwarkadhish Temple
3. Development of Siddheshwar Mahadev Temple
4. Development of street from Iskon Gate to Dwarkadhish Temple
5. Development of street from Teen Batti to Dwarkadhish Temple
6. Development of Tourism Circuit of Dwarka-Shivrajpur-Bet Dwarka-Gopi Talav-
Nageshwar
a. Development of jetties at Okha and Bet Dwarka
b. Development of arrival plaza at Bet Dwarka
c. Development of Darshan Path
d. Improvements in and around Dwarkadhish Temple, Bet Dwarka
e. Development of Ranchhod, Ratan and Shankhoddar Lakes
f. Development at Hanuman Dandi
7. Development of sea-link connecting Bet Dwarka to Samrasar
8. Development of Panchkui Island
9. Redevelopment of Dwarka Bus Stand
10. Development of Mayasar Lake
11. Development around Rukshmani Temple
12. Establishment of Sound and Light/ Laser Show
13. Street redevelopment of all major streets of Dwarka and Bet Dwarka
14. Development of Scientific Landfill Site
15. Pedestrianisation of processional routes and provision of eco-friendly shuttle service
16. Development of night shelters at suitable locations
The figure below shows the prohibited (100 metres) and regulated zones (300 metres)
around the Dwarkadhish Temple complex. The identified heritage zone for the CHP for the
city of Dwarka becomes a part of the delineated and the heritage zone as most of the
heritage lies in the zone.
The maps below provide a clear demarcation of the historic core for the city of Dwarka and
the civic infrastructure available in the historic core that includes location of public
conveniences, signage, location of SWM containers, street furniture and way-finding/ tourist
signage, Public transport and parking areas that needs to be considered while preparing
detailed project reports for the five priority areas.
These areas cover most of the tangible as well as intangible heritage of Dwarka city.These
areas require improvement in basic services and rejuvenation through urban design to
enhance their quality of space.
Heritage Zones are an integral part of the overall city development. As discussed in the
earlier sections, several effort are ongoing and more are being planned for civic
infrastructure improvement by various organisations. To proceed with design and
recommendations of Heritage Zones, their linkages with city level initiatives should be
established.
As per the HRIDAY framework, UMC recommends four key city level planning and
management proposals. These are
1. City Level Transport Management Plan
a. Controlled vehicular access to the delineated heritage area – vehicular
access should be restricted for visitors’ vehicles within the delineated heritage
area (refer map below). Access to emergency service should not be restricted
at all times of the day. Time based management should be introduced for
goods vehicles servicing the businesses and residences within the delineated
heritage area.
b. City level eco-friendly shuttle service – such a service should be initiated
providing vehicular access to the delineated heritage area. Routes and
frequency of service should be planned to cater all prominent areas.
The proposals for Heritage Zones have been tied-up with the above city level initiatives. This
section assesses each Heritage Zone and provides recommendations for civic infrastructure
improvement. The strategies and the solutions have been categorised as
A. New infrastructure/ equipment capital works
B. Repair of existing infrastructure/ equipment
C. Operation, maintenance and management
D. Tie-up with larger city level planning and policy solutions
Figure 37 Map showing all heritage assets w.r.t. selected heritage zones
The zone is the most significant with Dwarakadhish Temple at its centre. The temple is
surrounded by the traditional residential typology that is fast changing with increase in
commercailisation. Adjacent to the zone lies the Gomti Ghat, which is another significant
heritage area of the city.The highlighted area selected under this Heritage Zone is shown in
the map. A brief description of the site has been provided in the table below.
S. No. Parameter Indicator
Dwarkadhish Temple is protected by the Archaeological
Survey of India (ASI). The forecourt/ square serves as the
1 Heritage value attached
congregation/ public space and provides a foreground to the
monument.
2 Category Congregational court / Public plaza/ Square
To improve civic infrastrcuture in the square and prepare
design guidelines for coherent development around the
3 Objective square. The guidelines will enhance the grandeur of the
monument and maintain architectural harmony in the new
developments
Pedestrian pathways, barrier free environment, information
signage, lighting and surveillance, street furniture, parking,
4 Focus components
water-sanitation amenities, architectural design guidelines for
buildings surrounding the square
Area of the Heritage
5 Approximately 10,500 sqm
Zone
Figure 39 Steps south of the temple (left); Plaza east of the temple (right)
Threats
- As the forecourt is a congregation space, it holds up to a few thousand people during
festivals waiting to offer prayers in the temple. In the absence of effective crowd
management, the place is prone to stampedes
- The forecourt is a sensitive place from the security perspective. Access to the
forecourt needs to be monitored to provide security to the temple.
- Encroachments by buildings on the roads around the forecourt threaten the heritage
and architectural character of the place.
- Unregulated construction – mostly in violation of the AMASR Act 2010 and the
heritage bye-laws, poses a serious threat to the temple and the forecourt. There have
been many buildings which have been demolished, constructed, modified and
renovated within the prohibited and regulated zone including the Sharda Pith.
- With the pressure of urbanisation, taller buildings are coming up around the temple
complex and the forecourt. This is posing a serious threat to the skyline and visual
character of the place.
- In the absence of any architectural guidelines in the Second Revised DP 2018, new
construction is mostly incongruent with the architectural style of the historic core of
the city
The proposal to make civic improvements in Dwarkadhish Temple forecourt originates from
addressing various issues highlighted by the stakeholders and the analysis conducted by
UMC of the site. The issues identified have been listed below and the strategies and
corresponding solutions to address the issues have been proposed.
Table 10 Block cost estimate for proposed development at Temple Forecourt (Heritage Zone01)
Area Cost Cost
Particulars Cost/unit Quantity
(sqm) (INR)/unit (INR)
Landscape development
500 5000/sqm 5000 500 2500000
(trees/plants)
Vending space plinth 150 20000/cu.m. 20000 150 3000000
Medical or emergency block 150 42000/sqm. 42000 150 6300000
Bollard Lump sum 200000
Table 11 Area statement for proposed development at Temple Forecourt (Heritage Zone 01)
Space for Development Area (sqm)
Open space inside the temple boundary 2,430
Junction 1 (surrounded by shops towards the 2nd entrance) 320
Street 1 in front of temple 700
Junction 2 (currently the holding space towards main entrance) 650
Street 2 leading to Gomti Ghat 1,050
Junction 3 (at the waiting area for visitors near Gomti Ghat) 730
Street 3 (leading to temple rear entrance running parallel to Gomti Ghat) 820
Medical/Emergency block expansion (at the temple open space) 700
Total 7,400
The areas have been calculated based on the drawings prepared using Google Earth satellite image. The areas
are subject to change during the DPR stage.
These are some significant heritage structures in the zone.The square houses a vegetable
market building constructed during the first half of twenthieth century. The structure is built in
colonial architectural style, much like other buildings constructed during the period. Adjacent
to the vegetable market building, an information cum exhibition centre has been setup by the
Department of Information, GoG. The information cum exhibition centre runs in a building
with hertiage improtance constructed during the colonial period.
The square is highly significant for heritage and tourism but does not have adequate
signage, street furniture, pedestrian facilities and plan to manage vending activities. The
following table highlights the characteristic of the area.
Weaknesses
- The most important asset of the square – the vegetable market, is showing signs of
structural weakness
- Garbage can be found at the square and its adjacent streets at all times
- Unregulated vending in the square hinders movement in the square
- Haphazard parking of private vehicles, auto-rickshaws and jeeps makes movement
through the square inconvenient, and at times hazardous.
- Due to heavy movement of vehicles through the square, it has become a centre of
conflict between pedestrians and vehicles
- Stray cattle can be found in the square resulting in dung all over
- There are no seating and resting places in the square
- There are no signage at the square to direct visitors to prominent places in the city
- There are no clean public conveniences in and around the square leading to
inconvenience to the visitors
Opportunities
- The square presents an opportunity to be developed as a prominent heritage square
through appropriate design and regulation of built fabric around it
- In case of pedestrianisation of the old core permanently or during festivals (as
suggested by some stakeholders), the square can serve as the starting point for a
shuttle service to the temple and other places of interest in the old core.
- One of the roads from the square is lined with prominent temples (including
Swaminarayan Temple and Birla Temple) and dharmashalas, and leads further to
Gomti Ghat and Samudra Narayan Beach. This provides an opportunity for
commercial activities in the buildings surrounding the square and thus playing a
crucial role in local economic development
Table 12 Block cost estimate for Vegetable Market Square (Heritage Zone 02)
Particulars Area Rate Cost (INR) Quantity Cost (INR)
(Sqm) (INR)/unit
Paving
1. Construction of 2500 900/sqm. 900 2500 2250000
new footpath
2. Repairing of 1000 600/sqm. 600 1000 600000
existing footpath
3. Vendor Space 1000 1200/sqm. 1200 1000 1200000
4. Kerb stones r length 50/ unit 50 415 20750
each
Landscape 1800 1700/ sqm. 1700 1800 3060000
development
Parking 550 4000/cu.m. 4000 550 2200000
Bollards 10,000/unit 10000 20 200000
Street lights 60,000/unit 60000 20 1200000
(International Brands)
Sculptures Lump sum
Benches 20,000/bench 20000 20 600000
Information kiosk 100000/unit 100000 4 400000
Signage 60,000/unit 60000 5 300000
Toilets
1. New toilet 75,000/toilet 75000 12 900000
construction seat
2. Repairing cost 50,000 (lump 50000 2 100000
sum)
Drinking water stations 10,00,000/unit
1000000 3 3000000
Information plates for 10,000/unit10000 4 40000
heritage structures
Vegetable market 80 8000000 1 8000000
buildings lakh/structure
CCTV camera 6000/unit 6000 4 24000
Resurfacing of 4000 800/sqm. 800 4000 3200000
roads
Utility Duct 40000/m 250 10000000
Total 37694750
Three crore seventy six lakhs ninety four thousand seven hundred fifty
All costs have been calculated with applicable rates in 2015-16. These rates are tentative and are subject to
change.
Table 13 Area statement for Vegetable Market Square (Heritage Zone 02)
Space for Development Area (sqm)
Vegetable Market Restoration 1,000
Landscape Development as public space 1,300
Space for handicrafts and vending activities 1,000
Parking for two wheelers 475
Footpath for pedestrian movement 2,650
Carriage way for vehicles 4,000
Information kiosk 20
Toilet and Drinking water stations 200
Total 10,645
The areas have been calculated based on the drawings prepared using Google Earth satellite image. The areas
are subject to change during the DPR stage.
Owing to its religious significance and conglomerate of historic assets, this site has been
selected as Heritage Zone to be developed under the HRIDAY project.
S. No. Parameter Indicator
1 Category Precinct/ open public square/ plaza
Cluster of temples; historic stepwell of architectural
2 Heritage value attached
significance
To improve the civic amenities at the precinct/ square for
3 Objective
monks, residents and visitors
Paving and landscape of the square, design guidelines for
4 Focus components surrounding buildings, street furniture, information signage,
street lighting, parking, public toilets and parking
Area of the Heritage
5 Approximately 2,500 sqm
Zone
Strengths
- The Siddheshwar Mahadev plaza is provides a peaceful respite amidst the otherwise
crowded old core, even during the festivals
- The plaza is very well connected to the vegetable market square and the Samudra
Narayan Beach and is a short 5 minute walk away from these two prominent centres
of the city
- There is a stepwell, a few temples and remains of an old graveyard enhancing its
heritage and traditional significance
- It is usually thronged by monks who spend a lot of time in the plaza resting and
praying. It is a unique space in the city housing such activities.
Weaknesses
- The place is little known to tourists and not many people visit despite its heritage
importance.
- Being an open plaza, there is a nuisance of cattle excreta and stagnant water pools
especially during monsoon.
- The plaza has garbage strewn around and a lot of it is dumped in the stepwell
- The plaza is poorly maintained with broken paving and potholed roads.
- The plaza lacks appropriate street furniture and street lighting making the space
unusable during evenings
Opportunities
- The plaza is in proximity and well connecting to the vegetable market square to and
Samudra Narayan Beach presenting an opportunity to develop it as a prominent
tourist attraction.
- Moreover, with presence of heritage structures, temples and a stepwell, more visitors
can be encouraged to perform the rituals at the site and promote its cultural vibrancy
- The space also presents an opportunity to be developed as a public space for the
local residents and monks in the nearby dharmashalas.
Threats
- The plaza has open space, has access through major roads and is in proximity to
major attractions of the city which may lead to visitors parking their vehicles in the
plaza.
- In the absence of design guidelines for surrounding building, the plaza may lose its
heritage character if new buildings/ renovations to existing buildings are not sensitive
in design towards the plaza.
- Local stakeholders including the residents and monks may perceive it as a nuisance
unless consulted extensively during the redevelopment of the plaza.
Table 15 Area statement for Siddheshwar Mahadev Precinct (Heritage Zone 03)
Space for Development Area (sqm)
Stalls and Kiosk 100
Concrete plaza 900
Paving 450
Landscape 247
Parking 312
Total 2,009
The areas have been calculated based on the drawings prepared using Google Earth satellite image. The areas
are subject to change during the DPR stage.
This site has been selected as a Heritage Zone to be developed under the HRIDAY project.
S. No. Parameter Indicator
1 Category Streetscape
Main path leading from the highway to the temple; spots for
2 Heritage value attached performing rituals along the street; heritage structures along the
street
To create primarily pedestrian street (by limiting vehicles and
3 Objective
not complete pedestrianisation), regulating parking and vending
Pedestrian pathways, barrier free street, street furniture, street
4 Focus components lighting, resting spaces, public toilets and elevation control for
buildings along the street.
Area of the Heritage
5 Approximately 600 metres
Zone
Weaknesses
- Street has a bottle necks at some places which obstruct the smooth movement of the
vehicular traffic today
- Unpaved and potholed street surface along this street
- The street has been found dirty on many occasions and garbage is found littered all
over
- There are no roadside dustbins along the road
- Unregulated vending along the street hinders movement in the square
- Haphazard parking of private vehicles, auto-rickshaws and jeeps makes movement
through the street inconvenient and at times hazardous.
- Stray cattle can be found in the street resulting in dung all over
- There are no seating and resting places along the street, except Kaklash Kund
- There is hardly any signage to orient and direct the visitor to the temple
- There are no clean public conveniences along the street leading to inconvenience to
the visitors
Opportunities
- The street has potential to provide efficient connectivity to the temple forecourt
- It has a potential to provide the on street parking space for visitors to the temple
- It is possible to accommodate public conveniences along the street as land is
available
Threats
- The major threat is the safety of the pedestrian is uncontrolled traffic movement and
stray cattle
- Lack the of the designated parking space along the street increase the obstruction in
the smooth traffic movement
- The bad condition of the heritage structure along the street pose threat to the
heritage character of the street.
- Encroachment and improper implementation of the control regulation, bottlenecks
hamper the smooth traffic movement.
Proposed Plan
The proposal to make civic improvements in street from Iskon gate to Jodhabha Chowk to
Temple forecourt originates from addressing various issues highlighted by the stakeholders
and the analysis conducted by UMC of the site. The issues identified have been listed below
and the strategies and corresponding solutions to address the issues have been proposed.
The solutions have been categorised as
A. New infrastructure/ equipment capital works
B. Repair of existing infrastructure/ equipment
C. Operation, maintenance and management
D. Tie-up with larger city level solution
Table 16 Block cost estimate for Darshan Path (Iskon) (Heritage Zone 04)
Total Cost
Particulars Area (sqm) Cost (INR)/ Unit Quantity
(INR)
Construction of footpath 4440 900/ sqm 4440 3,995,696
Vendors space 150 2000/ sqm 150 300,000
Parking 562 4000/ cum 562 2,248,000
Street lights 35000/ unit 119 4,760,000
Benches 20000/ bench 7 140,000
Signage 10000 40 400,000
1,00,000/ toilet
Toilets 8 800,000
seat
Drinking water stations 400000 1 400,000
Information plates for heritage
10000/ unit 2 20,000
structures
Resurfacing of roads 3537 800/ sqm. 3537 2,829,603
Demolition of existing toilet 40 200/ cum 40 8,000
Street dustbins 1600/ dustbin 60 96,000
Utility Duct 40000/m 620 24,800,000
Landscape development 60 1,700/sq.m 60 36,557
Total 40,899,300
Approx. 4 crores 9 lakhs
All costs have been calculated with applicable rates in 2015-16. These rates are tentative and are subject to
change.
Table 17 Area statement for Darshan Path (Iskon) (Heritage Zone 04)
Space for Development Area (sqm)
Street vendor 44
Road surface (tar) road 4750
Paved area 50
Unpaved 9560
Building 5
Parking 300
Total 14,709
The areas have been calculated based on the drawings prepared using Google Earth satellite image. The areas
are subject to change during the DPR stage.
The route is about 300 metres in length and varies from 6 to 15 metres in width along its
length. The street has a mix of residential and commerical activities along it.
At the northern end of the street is the Teen Batti – a prominent junction in the old core. A
few metres south of the Teen Batti chowk starts the traditional retail market of the old core of
Dwarka. The zig-zag street leads to the north-western end of the Dwarkadhish Temple
complex.This site has been selected as a Heritage Zone to be developed under the HRIDAY
project.
Weaknesses
- Street has a bottle necks at some places which obstruct the smooth movement of the
vehicular traffic today
- The street has been found dirty on many occasions and garbage is found littered all
over
- There are no roadside dustbins along the road
- Unregulated vending along the street hinders movement in the square
- Haphazard parking of private vehicles, auto-rickshaws and jeeps makes movement
through the street inconvenient and at times hazardous.
- Stray cattle can be found in the street resulting in dung all over
- There is hardly any signage to orient and direct the visitor to the temple
- There are no clean public conveniences along the street leading to inconvenience to
the visitors
Threats
- The major threat is the safety of the pedestrian is uncontrolled traffic movement
- Encroachment and improper implementation of the control regulation, bottlenecks
hamper the smooth traffic movement.
nc
Table 18 Block cost estimate for Darshan Path (Teen Batti) (Heritage Zone 05)
Area
Particulars Cost/unit Units Cost (INR)
(sqm.)
Construction of footpath 2663 900/ sqm 2670 24,03,000
Vendors space 65 2000/ sqm 70 1,40,000
Parking 65 4000/ cum 70 2,80,000
Street lights 60000/ unit 60 36,00,000
Benches 20000/ bench 10 2,00,000
Signage 10000 30 3,00,000
Drinking water stations 400000 2 8,00,000
Information plates for heritage
structures 10000/ unit 2 20,000
Resurfacing of roads 665 800/ sqm. 670 5,36,000
Street dustbins 1600/ dustbin 60 96,000
Utility Duct 46000/m 365 167,90,000
Total 215,65,000
All costs have been calculated with applicable rates in 2015-16. These rates are tentative and are subject to
change.
Table 19 Area statement for Darshan Path (Teen Batti) (Heritage Zone 05)
Space for Development Area (sqm)
Street vendor 65
Road surface ( tar) road 665
Paved area 2663
Parking 65
Total 3,458
The areas have been calculated based on the drawings prepared using Google Earth satellite image. The areas
are subject to change during the DPR stage.
Project Phasing
As per the HRIDAY guidelines, the Heritage Zone projects would be implemented in the
mission period, i.e. March 2017.
Source of Funding
The primary source of funding for the above budget is HRIDAY mission. The funds have
been provided by the Government of India to UD&UHD, GoG. To implement other projects
from the shelf of projects, the following schemes/ missions of the national and state
governments can be considered.
1. SWADESH DARSHAN
2. PRASAD
3. AMRUT
4. National Urban Livelihood Mission (NULM)
5. Chardham Connectivity Project
6. Zila Ayojan Grant (District Planning Grant)
7. MP/ MLA funds
8. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) through private companies and public sector
undertakings (PSU)
9. Public private partnership (PPP)
Going by the recommendation of the CLAMC, any organisation with a project proposal/
concept would entrust the SPV for its further design, preparation of facilities management
plan, DPR preparation, appointment of contractors and monitoring execution of the project.
Upon completion, the operation and maintenance of the project should also be handed over
to the SPV.
The SPV may be provided an initial seed capital by the Government of Gujarat, and the SPV
shall develop a revenue generation model from potential sources such as parking fee,
shuttle service, user charges against services to shops and establishments, entry fee
(wherever applicable) and O&M funds from TCGL, GPYVB, Urban Development and Urban
Housing Department (UD&UHD), GoG, Dwarka Municipality and Okha Municipality.
The SPV may be governed by a board comprising of ex-officio members from the District
Administration, Dwarka and Okha municipalities, UD&UHD, TCGL, GPYVB, representation
of NGOs/ CBOs, citizen representatives, academic institutions, professionals in the fields of
architecture/ heritage/ urban design and administrative offices of Dwarkadhish Temples in
Dwarka and Bet Dwarka.
Further details about the legal incorporation, jurisdiction, financing and details roles and
responsibilities of the SPV would be decided by the district administration subsequently
along with the state government.
Infrastructure projects
1. Development of Vegetable Market
2. Development of forecourt of Dwarkadhish Temple
3. Development of Siddheshwar Mahadev
4. Development of street from Iskon Gate to Dwarkadhish Temple
5. Development of street from Teen Batti to Dwarkadhish Temple
6. Development of Tourism Circuit of Dwarka-Shivrajpur-Bet Dwarka-Gopi Talav-
Nageshwar
a. Development of jetties at Okha and Bet Dwarka
b. Development of arrival plaza at Bet Dwarka
c. Development of Darshan Path
d. Improvements in and around Dwarkadhish Temple, Bet Dwarka
e. Development of Ranchhod, Ratan and Shankhoddar Lakes
f. Development at Hanuman Dandi
7. Development of sea-link connecting Bet Dwarka to Samrasar
8. Development of Panchkui Island
9. Redevelopment of Dwarka Bus Stand
10. Development of Mayasar Lake
11. Development around Rukshmani Temple
12. Establishment of Sound and Light/ Laser Show
13. Street redevelopment of all major streets of Dwarka and Bet Dwarka
14. Development of Scientific Landfill Site
15. Pedestrianisation of processional routes and provision of eco-friendly shuttle service
16. Development of night shelters at suitable locations
This toolkit provides guidelines for development for varied projects include precincts, streets,
open spaces and buildings. Specific toolkit has been prepared for each of the project
category listed below.
1. Area-wide urban guideline toolkit: This describes issues which apply generally
throughout the delineated heritage areas.
2. Public streetscape, plaza and open space guideline toolkit: The major focus is on the
streetscape, plaza and open space environment which affects the pedestrian. These
guidelines propose the adoption of a uniform philosophy through shared vision for
open spaces and plazas within urban centres. This vision would result in the focus of
pedestrian activity pre-eminently over vehicular modal transport in urban settings.
This includes all the elements that can make a pedestrian comfortable such as the
sidewalk, street trees, street furniture, and the facade of the building, open spaces
and plazas are public spaces, and that these natural public amenities encourage
human occupancy.
3. Building guideline toolkit and Palette creation: These guidelines include
recommendations for the physical makeup and shape of construction inside the
property lines and highlight all the materials and components which can be used in
the heritage area.
This toolkit shall be largely applicable throughout the HRIDAY delineated area and
specifically applicable to identified Heritage Zones.
Area wide urban guideline toolkit will provide a broad framework to be followed at a macro context
which will be applicable to every Heritage Zone selected. This toolkit will provide the consultant with
a template of broad parameters of Do’s and Don’ts, which are to be followed while preparation of
the Detailed Project Report. These guidelines will hence bind the complete city and its structures of
heritage value through parameters such as building re-use, Bye-laws, Development Control
Regulations (DCR) across a buffer area of the Heritage Zone, parking facilities, connectivity, etc.
The template is designed by considering the vision of the CHP on the existing condition and a DPR
guided by the toolkit will have to be prepared by the consultant.
S. Parameter Guidelines
No.
1 Bye-laws 200 m 500 m
(within buffer area)
2 Development Control All Heritage Zones to follow the recommended DCRs such as setbacks,
Regulations form, fenestration, façade and accessibility guidelines developed under this
category. The detail checklist for the DCR is provided in Annexure 3.
3 Vista / Avenues Any element or component of building such as balcony projections, weather
hang, roof, or infrastructure facilities such as light poles, electric pole,
communication tower, tree trunk or tree foliage, canopies, gazebos, gates,
kiosks, information booth, public amenity or parking facilities, etc. in form of
temporary or permanent nature shall not be built within the area which
provides a strong lateral or linear vista of the main temple.
This toolkit shall be largely applicable throughout the HRIDAY delineated area and
specifically applicable to streets leading to Heritage zones and plazas mentioned in the
CHP document.
Public streetscape toolkit will provide a broad framework to be followed while designing a DPR for
the streets leading to the heritage zones and plazas mentioned in the CHP document. This toolkit
will provide the consultant with a template of broad design and O&M guidelines, which are to be
followed while preparation of the design and Detailed Project Report for the streetscape. These
guidelines will hence bind the streets and squares of the complete city through street elements
including the pedestrian footpath, street furniture, vendor and parking space, signage, security and
communication systems, etc. The template is designed by considering the existing condition and
the vision of the CHP. A DPR guided by this toolkit will have to prepare by the consultant. For the
quick reference, a Reference Catalogue Toolkit is also prepared and attached.
A list of all the elements is presented below followed by a detailed guideline to be followed
while designing and selection of vendor for the specific elements listed under the CHP
toolkit.
List of elements:
S. No. Element S. No. Element
1 Pedestrian footpath 14 Parking bay
2 Light poles 15 Vendors bay/ platform /Stalls
3 Seating 16 Public conveniences / Toilets
4 Garbage bins 17 Drinking water tap/kiosk
5 Electric poles 18 Cycle stands
6 Bollards 19 Bus stands
7 Information Panels 20 Security cabins
8 Signage 21 Hoarding panels
9 Manhole cover 22 Traffic islands
10 Path for special vehicle 23 Emblems / Posts / Stambhs
11 Service utility bay 24 Compound wall / fencing
12 Storm water Manhole 25 CCTV camera box
13 Cable trench bay
Though the above list is comprehensive, however for a specific heritage zone certain
elements would be designed specifically as per the immediate context. For e.g. certain
elements for the temple forecourt zone would have a design specifically for that area. As the
immediate context is exclusive, the design of elements may vary a bit to suit to the
immediate context.
This in particular would address the need of variety in design and add to the image of the
heritage zone.
Street lights for pedestrian footpath and carriageway are different and carry
different specification. Though the light poles on pedestrian footpath shall
comply with the UDFI guidelines in its technical specification. However, the
aesthetic shall be in sync with the local architecture/language. Use of certain
emblems, ornamentation, etc. shall be done while designing the light poles.
Street scape issues and considerations during preparation of city conservation plan
Archeological Survey of India. (2011). Alphabetical List of Monuments - Gujarat. Retrieved February
09, 2016, from Archeological Survey of India:
http://asi.nic.in/asi_monu_alphalist_gujarat.asp
Brahmi. (2012). Retrieved September 09, 2015, from Ancient Scripts: a compendium of world-wide
writing systems from prehistory to today: http://www.ancientscripts.com/brahmi.html
Census of India. (2001). Town directory Gujarat. Retrieved from Census of India:
http://www.censusindia.gov.in/DigitalLibrary/MFTableSeries.aspx
Census of India. (2011). Primary Census Abstract Data Tables. Retrieved from Census of India:
http://censusindia.gov.in/pca/pcadata/Houselisting-housing-Gujarat.html
Dwarka Municipality. (2015). Service Level Improvement Plans (SLIP) for Water Supply, Sewerage,
Storm Water Drainage, Green Spaces & Parks and Urban Transport for submission under the
AMRUT Scheme. Dwarka, Gujarat.
Dwarkadhish Temple. (2016). Retrieved February 09, 2016, from Indian Mirror:
http://www.indianmirror.com/temples/dwarkadish-temple.html
Gaur, A., Tripati, S., & Tripati, S. (2005). Ancient Dwarka: Study based on recent Underwater
Archaeological Investigations. Migration and Diffusion, Volume 6(Issue Number 21).
Retrieved January 28, 2016, from http://www.migration-
diffusion.info/pdfdownload.php?id=105&file=1
Government of Gujarat. (1970). Gujarat State Gazetteers: Jamnagar District. Places of Interest.
Jamnagar District, Gujarat: Government of India.
Government of Gujarat. (2016). Administrative Setup. Retrieved February 05, 2016, from
Collectorate - District Devbhumi Dwarka:
https://devbhumidwarka.gujarat.gov.in/administrative-setup
Gujarat Industrial and Technical Consultancy Organisation Limited. (2015). Tourism Footfall
Information System. Gujarat, India.
Gujarat Marine National Park and Marine Sanctuary conservation society. (2011). Welcome to
Gujarat Marine National Park & Sanctuary. Retrieved February 05, 2016, from Marine
National Park Conservation Society: http://mnpcs.gov.in/
Himadri Enviro protection consultants, A. (2009). Detailed Project Report for water supply for
Dwarka Nagar Seva Sadan. Dist. Jamnagar Gujarat.
Indian Navy. (2016, January 13). INS Dwarka: Historical Background. Retrieved January 27, 2016,
from Indian Navy: http://www.indiannavy.nic.in/content/ins-dwarka
Industries and Mining Department, Government of Gujarat. (2015, December 05). પ્રાવાસન અને
યાત્રા ધામ સ્થળોમાાં સર્ુ વધાઓ ર્વકસાવવા માટે ના DPR / પ્લાન / ડીઝાઈન અકીટેકટ-કમ-કન્સલ્ટાં ટ
INTACH, & Urban Management Centre. (2012). Heritage Byelaws for the prohibited and Regulated
areas of Dwarkadhish Group of Temples. Ahmedabad: INTACH Gujarat.
Joshi, S. (1992). 1860-1940 Baroda - Urban Transformation & Renewal- A City's attempt at
Revitalization. Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India: Unpublished Thesis, CEPT University.
Ministry of Urban Development. (2015). Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana:
Brochure. New Delhi, India: National Institute of Urban Affairs. Retrieved February 09, 2016,
from http://hridayindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/hriday-brochure.pdf
Rao, S. R. (1999). The Lost City of Dvaraka. New Delhi, Gujarat, India: Aditya Prakashan.
Shree Dwarkadhish Mandir Devasthan Samiti. (2015). Jagad Mandir - Time-Table & Festival
Calender. Retrieved February 09, 2016, from Dwarkadhish.org:
http://www.dwarkadhish.org/jagad-mandir/time-table/
Tourism Corporation of Gujarat Limited. (2015, December 28). Minutes of Meeting convened under
the Chairmanship of Managing Director, TCGL to finalise DPR for funding of Ministry of
Tourism, Government of India for development of Dwarka under the scheme of PRASAD.
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Retrieved
January 28, 2016, from United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization:
http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/convention
Urban Management Centre. (2014-15). Service Level Benchmarking in Water and Sanitation - data
collected under Performance Assessment System (PAS) Project. Unublished. Dwarka.
Urban Management Centre. (2015). Urban Management Centre. Unpublished raw data collected by
Urban Management Centre from Dwarka Municipality.
Vyas, M., & Magra, R. (2015, September 6). Discussion on operations of regional bus services in
Dwarka with Mr. Maheshbhai Vyas, Bus Stand In-charge and Mr. R K Magra, Depot In-
charge, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC), Dwarka. (Urban Management
Centre, Interviewer) Dwarka, Gujarat, India.
Bet Dwarka is an island 3 km off the coast of Okha city.The island is a pilgrim centre with
Dwarkadhish Temple and many other temples located on the it. Most of the visitors to
Dwarka visit Bet Dwarka. The island also houses several lakes, beaches and other sites of
tourist interest. As
TCGL has proposed to develop facilities at various sites on the Bet Dwarka island. Heritage
assets and sites include the following
i. Arrival plaza at the jetty and gopi talao
ii. Development of the main street from the arrival plaza to the Dwarkadhish Temple
iii. Development of open areas inside the temple complex
iv. Development of public amenities inculding toilets around the temple
v. Development of Ratan Lake, Ranchhod Lake and Shankhodar Lake
vi. Development of tourist amenities at Hanuman Dandi
Detailed assessment of this Heritage Zone has been conducted in the DPR Evaluation
Report.