CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Background of Problem
Reading is about understanding written texts. It is a complex activity that
involves both perception and thought. Reading consists of two related processes:
word recognition and comprehension. Word recognition refers to the process of
perceiving how how written symbols correspond to one spoken language.
Comprehension is the process of making sense of words, sentences, and connected
text. Readers typically make use of background knowledge, vocabulary,
grammatical knowledge, experience with text and other strategies to help them
understand written text.
According to Kalayo and Fauzan (2007:128), reading comprehension is an
activity with a purpose. It is very useful for all people. It is an interactive process
that goes on between the reader and the text. A person may read in order to gain
information or verify existing knowledge, or in order to analyze a researcher’s
ideas or reading style. Many schools or courses offer English as one of the
lessons. The important point is that the students get bask learning in English to
make the students easier to learn further. Therefore, the decrees of Indonesian
government No.19 year 2005 about standard of national education states that in
Improving people's ability in mastery English. The Indonesian government has
made an effort in English mastery in Education curriculum by giving English
lesson from the elementary school until high level education. The mastery of
1
English subject can be known by English standard of competence of listening,
speaking, reading, and reading.
Mark Clarke and Sandra Silberstein (1977:136-37) claim that reading is
only incidentally visual. More information is contributed by the readers than by
the print on the page. That is, readers understand what they read because they are
able to take the stimulus beyond it is graphic representation and assign it
membership to an appropriate group of concept already save in their memories.
Reading skill depends on the efficient interaction between linguistic knowledge
and knowledge of the world.
Reading has become one of the important language skills that learners
need since the first time they start to study English. Through reading they can get
much information they need either to the needs of mastering English itself or other
things. Then, without information they will surely not know anything happen
either change in situation of education, economic, politic, or necessary
information in reading text of English lesson specifically. In line with it, English
students need to be good in reading and get much information to increase their
knowledge and ability from the any sources that they have and get. In addition,
the students are expecting to develop their reading ability in understanding and
comprehending many kinds of texts.
Many students have read different sources in English to support their
academic project. Reading sources are provided in textbooks at any level of
education including second semester of the English Students of FKIP-UIR
2
Pekanbaru. In other words, reading is an integral part of English skills. Because of
it is importance, students’ reading improvement should become a priority. Both of
lecturers and students have to understand the rationale of this skill who wants to
improve their teaching and learning reading comprehension.
Based on the curriculum of the English Department of FKIP-UIR
Pekanbaru, the second semester students have to attend reading II as required
subject. In reading II, the students will learn types of article such as narrative,
descriptive, expository, and argumentative/persuasive and other scientific writing
as the material in reading class.
The curriculum of the English Department of FKIP-UIR Pekanbaru states
narrative, descriptive, expository, and argumentative/persuasive are applicable at
the second semester and after teaching those types of texts, the students are still
difficult to comprehend the descriptive texts, it is the reason why the researcher
chose the descriptive texts as her research. While descriptive texts help students in
variety of classroom situation and must prepare to continue this practice in the
workplace and in the real life decision making situation. In high school, college
and university classroom, students are required to read descriptive texts to
complete class assignment. Given the importance of description comprehension, it
is essential that all students become proficient text-based reasons and an important
toward this goal is to access university students’ ability to read and comprehend
complete description texts.
As the researcher observed during teaching and learning process in reading
class, the researcher finds some problems faced by students and lecturer. From
3
students side; first, when students read a reading text, and only to realized within a
few minutes that students could not remember what they just read. It made the
students spend many time to read the text in order to get the meaning of the text
that they have read. This fact can be seen from the result of reading exercise given
by lecturer in the classroom.
Second, even though the students have understood the text that they have
read, but 80 % of students had difficulty in describing what the information from
the text because the students are not trained to restate the text after reading.
Besides, students also have problem with various vocabulary to express the
information of the text that they have read. It is proved by the result of students
test. The lecturer also checked students’ comprehension by giving reading text,
she gave students a descriptive text, then asked students to answer the questions
by their own words, the students have difficulties to express the questions,
because they have problem in using of different vocabulary, at the result, the
students often used the same vocabulary of the original texts to express their
statement.
Last, the students are not able to restate the text to the new statement.
They are not able to construct the restatement to get the meaning of the text
properly. This fact proof, when lecturer asked the students to get the meaning of
the text that they have read and create the restatement based on the idea of the
text , the students seem to think hard and confuse. This fact also strengthened by
the result of students’ task and tests during process of learning. From 30 students
who joint in reading II, only 20% students could comprehend the text that they
4
have read by restating the text in other words. It indicated that students are not
able to restate their comprehension about the text they have read.
Then, the problems from lecturer side, lecturer did not pay attention for her
strategy in teaching reading activities, she still taught her students by using old
strategy, for example; displaying students reading text, finding the difficult words,
translating, and answering the questions. It makes students are not interested in
learning of reading. Less practice for students in restating the text that students
read, it makes students less experience in expressing the text that have read by
their own words. It also made students did not absolutely comprehend the reading
texts.
Realizing on the phenomenon above, the researcher considers two
particular Strategies namely paraphrase strategy and semantic map strategy to
solve these problems. By Paraphrasing strategy the students can restate a passage
precisely in the students own words in order to clarify the meaning. It purposes to
help the students understand the original text properly, and students able to
express the text content in other way or different words. Based on the reason,
paraphrase is an important strategy which can be used by students in order to
ensure that they have properly understood the material which has been studied.
Bellanca (1992) explains that the purpose of the Semantic Mapping strategy is to
help students identify prior knowledge and experience as a bridge to a new
concept, lesson, or unit. The Semantic Mapping strategy encourages the students
to active participating in English learning in which the Sixth activity is
recognizing the topic of the study and knowing the student knowledge about the
5
topic. And it is also as the stimulant to arise their motivation to learn English.
Sometime the students have no motivation in learning English because they have
not understood what they learn
The lecturerr will use these strategies in teaching reading at the second
semester of English Department Students of FKIP-UIR. The type of reading text
which is going to be used by the researcher is descriptive texts. Revealing all of
these, the researcher is interested to carry out a research entitled “A Comperative
Study on the Effects of RAP Paraphrasing Strategy and Semantic Map
Strategy towards students Reading Comprehension of Descriptive Texts at
Semester II of the English Department Program of FKIP-UIR Pekanbaru”.
1.2 The Statement of the Problem
The main aim of this study is to compare between RAP Paraphrasing
Strategy and Semantic Map Strategy towards students reading comprehension in
descriptive text. Rupp (2008: 57) mentions that reading comprehension is
complex, interactive and integrative and requires the effective interaction of
multiple mental components for the creation of multiple mental representation of
text. The role of reading comprehension plays in the process of learning is widely
document (Shanakan, Callison, Carriere, Duke, Pearson, Torgesen, et al. 2010;
Luckner & Handley 2008; Coleman 2003). These studies and many other similar
studies point to the fact that reading comprehension forms the basis for the
learning process. Thus, learners who read without comprehending what they read
6
have fewer chances of succeeding academically than learners who read with
comprehension.
Regarding to background of the problems above, there are some problems
in teaching-learning of reading, especially teaching learning of reading
comprehension of descriptive texts. The problems might come from students and
lecturers. However, those problems that considered to be solved immediately.
Most of the students are difficult to describe the text that they have read by they
own words or different way. Further, most of the students are not able to clarify
the meaning of the text that they read precisely. They also had difficulty to link
the text to restate the new statement.
Other problem is the lecturers themselves. It is difficult for the lecturers to
find and choice an interesting meaningful reading activities, because the lecturer
are still used old strategy in teaching reading. Further the lecturer did not pay
attention for her appropriate strategy in teaching and learning reading.
Since the phenomena also affect learners at the second semester English
Department FKIP UIR Pekanbaru, some questions need to be address. How can
lecturers help to students’ in reading comprehension? How the students have low
motivation to read an English text? How is the first grade student doing on
reading comprehension?, Do the students spend the time effectively in reading
comprehension, Do they realize the important of reading the text to encourage
their reading comprehension? How is the influence of reading strategy to their
reading comprehension by analyzing those variables? And is the teaching strategy
appropriate in improving the students’ ability in reading comprehension? Which
7
strategy gives better result either RAP Paraphrasing Strategy or Semantic Map
Strategy on reading comprehension?
By Paraphrasing strategy the students can restate a passage precisely in the
students own words in order to clarify the meaning. It purposes to help the
students understand the original text properly, and students able to express the text
content in other way or different words. Based on the reason, paraphrase is an
important strategy which can be used by students in order to ensure that they have
properly understood the material which has been studied. Bellanca (1992)
explains that the purpose of the Semantic Mappingstrategy is to help students
identify prior knowledge and experience as a bridge to a new concept, lesson, or
unit. The Semantic Mapping strategy encourages the students to active
participating in English learning in which the Sixth activity is recognizing the
topic of the study and knowing the student knowledge about the topic. And it is
also as the stimulant to arise their motivation to learn English. Sometime the
students have no motivation in learning English because they have not understood
what they learn
1.3 The Limitation of the Problem
This research investigates the comparison between RAP Paraphrasing
Strategy and Semantic Map Strategy on students reading comprehension in
descriptive text at the second semester students English Depatment of FKIP UIR
Pekanbaru. The limitation of the problem is to investigate which strategy gives
better result either RAP Paraphrasing Strategy and Semantic Map Strategy on
8
students reading comprehension in descriptive text at the second semester students
English Depatment of FKIP UIR Pekanbaru?
1.4 The Purpose and Objective of the Research
The purpose of this research is to investigate what is useful strategy that we
use in teaching and learning process and how to improve reading comprehension
and at the second semester students English Depatment of FKIP UIR Pekanbaru.
In learning English these problems arise so that more lecturers are trying to find
out what the barriers are and how to anticipate them. Based on the research
questions formulas, the objectives of the research are state as follows:
1. To find out whether RAP Paraphrasing Strategy gives significant effect on
students reading comprehension between Experimental group & Control
group
2. To find out whether Semantic Map strategy gives significant effect on
students reading comprehension between Experimental group & Control
group
3. To find significant difference on students’ reading comprehension between
using RAP Paraphrasing Strategy and Semantic Map strategy at the second
semester students English Depatment of FKIP UIR Pekanbaru.
1.5 The Research Questions
1. Does using RAP Paraphrasing Strategy give significant effect on students
reading comprehension between Experimental group & Control group?
9
2. Does using Semantic Map strategy give significant effect on students reading
comprehension between Experimental group & Control group?
3. Is there any significant difference on students’ reading comprehension
between using RAP Paraphrasing and Semantic Map strategy at the the second
semester students English Depatment of FKIP UIR Pekanbaru?
1.6 The Significance of the Research
The study aims to improve a new strategy in teaching English to English
Language learners as a research contribution to EFL teaching and learning. It is
expect that RAP Paraphrasing and Semantic Map strategy will generate future
EFL/ TESL research in future. Those strategies help the students to consciously
control how they learn reading comprehension so that they can be more efficient
and motivate.
The English Lecturer is also hope this study will help instructors or
lecturers of University as the designer in teaching learning process so that the
English lecturers are able to develop their knowledge and creativity in reading
descriptive text. To raise students’ awareness of reading comprehension,
As the student are concern hope this study will be, how to comprehend a
text, to increase their achievement in reading descriptive text, and also to
encourage them to be more active and high motivate students.
10
1.7 The Rationale of the Research
The success in teaching and learning process depends on the teacher’s effort
and motivation which is given by using RAP Paraphrasing and Semantic Map
strategy so the learners can be easily to appreciate their capability in product of
teaching activities. However it is a hard work and the researcher hopes that the
strategy which the researcher designs to be going useful not only for lecturer but
also for students in the teaching process. The researcher uses significant product
and can be using for one way for a teacher in the teaching process. So by using
RAP Paraphrasing Strategy and Semantic Map strategy can improve the students
reading comprehension is able proven.
According to Munro (2007:5) there are some benefit of paraphrase; first,
offering the students a chance to learn how to connect the text to the new thought.
Second, delivering them the manners to tell about ideas in the topic. Third, aiding
students to remember ideas in short term memory. Last, helping readers’ link new
statement with had they known.
Margosein, Pascarella and Pflaum (1982) and Vogt (1983) make a
confirmation in their research that semantic map was a better strategy. It is further
explained by them that, semantic map help the students to relate their background
knowledge to the new words and to see the conceptual connection among words
According to them also, implementation of semantic maps brings huge
developments in reading comprehension.
11
1.8 The Definition of Key Terms
In this research, the researcher tries to give simple definition of the title
so it does not become a far ranging discussion. The title of this research is A
Comperative Study on the Effects of RAP Paraphrasing Strategy and Semantic
Map Strategy towards students Reading Comprehension of Descriptive Texts at
Semester II/D of the English Department Program of FKIP-UIR Pekanbaru. The
definition of key term is as follows :
a) RAP Paraphrasing Strategy is a paraphrasing strategy involving an
individual reading a paragraph, asking himself or herself what the main
ideas and details about a paragraph are, and putting these ideas and details
into his or her own words (Schumaker, Denton, & Dechler, 1984).
b) Semantic Map Strategy is the process by which a graphic arrangement
is constructed demonstrating the major concepts and relationships in text
before, during, or after the text is read, based upon the students’ prior
knowledge or schema (Sinatra, Stahl-Gemake, & Berg, 1984).
c) Reading Comprehension is a fluent process of readers combining
information from a text and their background knowledge to build meaning
(Nunan, 2003: 68) Reading comprehension requires an interaction
between the text and the reader’s knowledge. In addition, reading
comprehension is determined by readers’ access to language, prior
knowledge and reading ability.
12