SubSonex Kitplanes
SubSonex Kitplanes
By Paul Dye
If you say “personal jet” in the lobby JSX-1 flew as a proof of concept air- so in April we headed down to Moriarty,
of a typical general aviation FBO, images plane several years ago, and astounded New Mexico, the home of test pilot Bob
of a Cessna Mustang, Eclipse 500, or the community as the first such design Carlton’s Desert Aerospace, to complete
maybe the up-and-coming Cirrus Vision since the BD-5J. Monnett took what the necessary transition training and give
will come to most people’s minds. Forget he learned from the fixed-gear JSX-1 the little jet a workout. The training pro-
those people. Let’s talk really personal— and refined the design to produce the gram devised by Carlton and Sonex (and
we’re not just general aviation, we’re JSX-2—the current design. An airplane approved by the FAA) is thorough, yet
Experimental aviation! How about a with up to two hours’ endurance, it is not not complicated, and prepares one well
single-seat cocoon with one jet engine just an airshow performance wonder; it for their first flight in the jet (see sidebar
and an unrestricted view out front— is a practical, fun machine that provides on page 21). The airplane flown for the
now that is personal. And where can you enough margin (in fuel, speed, structure, test was the JSX-2 prototype, currently
find that formula? In the new SubSonex and forgiving flying qualities) that the on tour with Carlton flying airshow rou-
from Sonex Aircraft, LLC. This single- dream of a true personal jet is now in tines for aviation fans around the coun-
engine Experimental jet features a reli- reach of anyone that can afford to build try. For a prototype, we were impressed
able, easy-to-install powerplant, and the a mid-level homebuilt. You wouldn’t with its fit and finish, and while a few
factory is already shipping ultra-quick- want to make it your only transporta- improvements are still in the works, it is
build kits to customers. tion machine, or a “daily driver/do-all” representative of what the first custom-
The SubSonex began as a dream in the plane—but as a way to unwind in the ers are building in workshops right now.
mind of Sonex founder John Monnett— sky, it would certainly fill the bill.
a dream for a personal sport jet that could KITPLANES® was given the oppor- Construction
be flown by someone with average to tunity to be the first independent orga- Structurally, the SubSonex appears to
good pilot talent and skill. The SubSonex nization to fly the jet for an evaluation, have a great deal in common with its
ViperJet
fairly quickly when the pilot throws the learn to shade the indicator panel with The top-mounted engine is attached
toggle switch on the panel. Three green your hand when checking that the gear structurally with two bolts. This allows
LEDs indicate that the gear is down and is down. for easy maintenance and a simple load
locked, and three red ones indicate that A small camera (actually an automo- path. The canopy is a tip-over and in
it is retracted. A small pressure gauge tive backup camera) is installed on the the current kits is pre-fitted and ready
located behind the pilot’s head indicates underside of the nose, looking back- to go—a huge time-saver for most
the pressure in the system; it is viewable ward. The image can be displayed on everyone. In the cockpit, plastic side
in flight, but not part of the normal scan. the EFIS screen if desired to make sure panels close out the mechanisms for
It is checked only if the pilot suspects a that the gear is actually extended. This controls on each side and make for a
problem. The LEDs can be a little tough is a good backup to the green LEDs, but comfortable environment for the pilot.
to see in direct sunlight, but you quickly we never had to use it in flight. The large single-screen MGL EFIS is in
CG without the hazard typical of low-wing lightweight aircraft of injur- John: Those who share the dream, understand the mission, have
ing the pilot and passenger when deploying the ’chute. qualifications—and the money—for a toy!
KP: John, you flew both the JSX-1 and the JSX-2. Can you describe KP: Are you making changes and improvements to the kit? Or do
how they are the same and how they differ? you think you’ve finalized the configuration?
John: Both aircraft fly pretty much the same. I am impressed by John: As with all Sonex designs, we are constantly striving to
how easy and solid they are to fly…much like a Sonex…on steroids! improve the design, its features, and the builder’s experience.
KP: Both John and Jeremy, describe your first flight in the jet. What Jeremy: I would call the configuration finalized. Keep in mind that JSX-2
were the emotions you felt, this being a long-term goal? is a second-generation aircraft—actually third if you count the major gear
John: As with any new design flight experience, euphoric emo- change of JSX-1—and had a few minor changes to assemblies to simplify
tions are shadowed by legitimate concern until proven unfounded. them for the kit market. At this time, no major changes are planned for
To realize the dream of becoming a jet pilot—even at the age of the kit. The documentation package is quite simple, with many isometric
70—defies description. I have been spoiled and have little ambition assemblies taking advantage of our 3D design tools and capabilities.
to get behind a spinning propeller again! KP: The quickbuild kit looks pretty complete. What is the most chal-
Jeremy: I felt comfortable when entering the cockpit…which lenging part of the build, in your opinion?
surprised me. I know the aircraft from the inside out and have John: The quickbuild kit does most all the real challenging tasks,
watched and studied lots of camera footage of Bob Carlton flying including the canopy.
it…there’s comfort in familiarity. The BonusJet TST-14 training Jeremy: The Sonex engineering team has been involved with the FAA’s
program was also huge in having me ready for what to expect. I National Kit Evaluation Team (NKET) process and worked to maximize the
felt relief once the wheels left the ground in having a simple and value of the kit and level of completion while staying compliant with the
stable aircraft to fly—just like the rest of the Sonex fleet. After spirit and intent of the Experimental/Amateur-Built aircraft rules.
landing, I felt extreme pride in my father and the rest of the Sonex KP: Is there much fabrication of parts by the builder, like the other
Aircraft team and satisfaction in achieving something that no other Sonex designs, or are most of the pieces formed, and the build is
microjet designer has before: a high-performance aircraft capable mostly assembly tasks?
of doing fully aerobatic maneuvers and still a lower-time pilot can Jeremy: The E/A-B SubSonex quickbuild kit is very comparable
be comfortable flying it. to the Sonex, Waiex, and Onex quickbuild kits with the wings and
KP: Describe some of the design challenges that you faced with the fuselage at a high level of completion, and the tail and control surfaces
JSX-2. Were there any design goals that you had to give up along the way? requiring some fabrication and all assembly.
John: The biggest design challenge was designing for a production KP: What’s Next? Has Sonex Aircraft got any designs warming up in
package that will ensure builders’ success. the bullpen behind the jet?
KP: Does the jet meet your original design goals for speed, payload, John: I won’t go there…We are always working on several concepts,
and performance? How about handling? but won’t reveal them until they are reality.
John: Yes! Jeremy: I agree about loose lips sinking ships. We are always work-
KP: I understand that you have sold and shipped a number of JSX-2 ing on new designs and new concepts and that’s what makes our com-
kits already. Can you tell us how many are on their way to customers? pany and design team special. I will say that we do not plan, or desire,
John: Seven have been delivered to date. to come out with new things that compete with our proven products.
KP: How big of a market do you expect for the SubSonex? At $130,000 KP: Feel free to expound on anything else you’d like to say!
for the airframe kit with engine, it is within the financial reach of many John: I hope you have as much fun flying SubSonex as I do!
who build Experimentals; who do you think might pick this airplane Jeremy: Ditto!
instead of building a similar-priced airplane from another manufacturer? —P.D.
AIRFRAME
Length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ft 6 in
Wingspan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ft
Wing area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.0 sq ft
Fuel capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 40 gal (usable with safe foam)
Maximum gross weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 lb utility,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 lb aerobatic
Typical empty weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 lb equipped with a secondary safety belt at all three landing gear—a backup to
Typical useful load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 lb utility, which we also fastened—it was there, the gear position lights. Additional
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400 lb aerobatic so why not use it. Once harnessed in, preflight tasks include setting the fuel
Load Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +4.4/-2.2 G utility,
there was plenty of room to swing computer with the current quantity,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+6/-3 G aerobatic
Seating capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 my head around to see the pneu- checking the battery voltage, and set-
Cabin width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 in matic pressure gauge behind my head ting the parking brake for the start. The
(which does not need to be monitored large combined flap and brake lever on
PERFORMANCE routinely). Visibility in all directions the left side currently has a few pinch
Max level speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 mph
except straight back was excellent, and points, but I was told that the design
Cruise speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240+ mph
Maximum rate of climb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1600 fpm controls fell easily to hand. has already been changed to allow more
Stall speed (landing configuration) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 mph The prestart routine involves pow- room for larger hands.
Stall speed (clean) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 mph ering up the MGL EFIS, setting the The start sequence begins when you
Takeoff distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1200 ft altimeter, and preparing to record power up engine electronics and check
Landing distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 ft
data (if required). One unique step is the display with the lamp test feature.
Range (30-min reserve) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480 statute miles
Specifications are manufacturer’s estimates and are based on the
to bring up a video window to have a Next comes the fuel pumps and a check
configuration of the demonstrator aircraft. look at a nose camera that looks back to make sure the pressure comes up
Lasting Impressions
The SubSonex is not a hard airplane to
fly at all—just different in a few ways.
You need to have some speed to get a
good climb, and you need to be aware
of the time it takes to spool up the
engine on approach in case you find
yourself low. A shallow approach can
be nice and stabilized.
Slow flight in the airplane is comfort-
able because this jet actually has some
wing; I have flown many homebuilts
with bad stall characteristics, but this
is not one of them. Because you are sit-
ting ahead of the wing, and there is very
little ahead of you, sight references for
turns and other maneuvers are sparse—
a quick glance at the attitude on the
screen is a good idea.
It would be nice if the MGL EFIS had
a velocity vector (flight path indicator)
like other systems; this is generally the
quickest way I know to make sure you
aren’t climbing or diving when sight
references fail you. Nevertheless, I was
The key to the BonusJet is the PBS TJ-100 engine—in this installation using a bifurcated The instrument panel on the BonusJet
nozzle to avoid the vertical fin on the Bonus airframe. is standard glider—except for the jet
engine monitoring panel at the bottom.
bringing the power back to 98%. The engine limits are five minutes at simply make your descent slower and—if you are high—fly with the
full throttle, 30 minutes at 98%, and unlimited at 92%. spoilers all the way out to get down.
Once aloft and clear of the airport, normal air work proved the Bonus- This sometime-glider-pilot has occasionally landed far short of the
Jet’s capability as both a sailplane and a powered aircraft. Stalls, slow desired parking spot and run out of energy on the runway, leading to an
flight, and steep turns are part of the transition, and once you get your ignominious long push of the glider down the pavement by foot. Not so
feet and hands coordinated, you can fly with precision. Those who have with the BonusJet’s engine running—once planted with spoilers out,
never flown a high-performance, long-winged sailplane will discover you can add power and taxi so long as you keep the wings level with
their unique handling characteristics. Acclimatization to the effects of aileron (assuming you have some airspeed). The very effective Beringer
adverse yaw, the flexibility of the structure, and the slower overall speed brake on the mainwheel can modulate speed to bring the aircraft to a
range (redline is 111 knots) takes some time. There is little pitch change stop precisely where you want it—with the wingtip in your waiting
with power, and we flew with the trim always within a three-notch range. support crewmember’s hand. Shutting down the engine, giving it a
You can shut down the engine, allow it to cool for two minutes, and then minute or two to cool down, and then making sure that you disconnect
stow the engine and pylon with a throw of a switch anytime you wish. In- the fuel lines to prevent fuel from flowing between wing tanks secures
air relights are even simpler—you can unstow and start the engine with the aircraft after flight. Once again, the checklist is important.
no delay—and have power up and ready to go in about thirty seconds.
A Great Transition Trainer
Back to Earth Despite the obvious differences between the BonusJet and the
Landing a “glider” under power is not really complicated—you just SubSonex, it turns out that the one prepares you well for the other.
have to remember that you have at least 45 pounds of thrust all the And even if the SubSonex is not your goal, the BonusJet training
time. The procedure is actually quite simple: Pull the throttle to flight program is available to anyone who would like to add that first turbine
idle (50% RPM) at low key, abeam the touchdown point, and fly it to rating to their license—for a reasonable amount of money. For more
landing like a glider, managing the glideslope with the spoilers. Fifty information, go to www.desertaerospace.com. J
percent power is nowhere near enough to take off or climb, so it will —P.D.
Bob Carlton, founder of Desert Aerospace The author about to go up for a training mission with instructor Bill Hill in the back seat.
and creator of the BonusJet.