Botrytis Medusae
Botrytis Medusae
13005
In a collection of 735 Botrytis isolates sampled from Australian wine grape-growing regions, a single isolate from clade
I and group I (based on Bc-hch RFLP analysis) was found. As many Botrytis species are known to live sympatrically, it
was hypothesized that this isolate might be a new Botrytis species. After phenotypic and molecular assays supported
this hypothesis, the species was designated B. medusae. Phylogenetic analyses using the nuclear genes G3PDH, HSP60,
RPB2, NEP1 and NEP2 consistently placed B. medusae in an early-diverging clade I Botrytis spp. lineage. Botrytis
medusae produced white aerial mycelium, grew faster at 30 °C and produced long-branched conidiophore extensions,
compared with B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea. Botrytis medusae was only able to infect wounded grape leaves and
was significantly less virulent on wounded leaves and berries than B. cinerea. Botrytis medusae also lacked villiform
appendages on the conidial surface and long conidiophores, which are defining features of B. sinoviticola and B. cali-
fornica, respectively. Identification and characterization of new cryptic Botrytis species living in sympatry on grapevines
could potentially provide information to assist disease management strategies for B. cinerea.
Keywords: Botrytis, cryptic species, grey mould, phylogeny, speciation, species complex
ª 2019 The Authors. Plant Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society for Plant Pathology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License,
which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and
is not used for commercial purposes. 1
2 L. A. Harper et al.
Table 1 The origin and GenBank accession numbers of partial sequences of the five genes used for phylogenetic analysis of Botrytis medusae,
B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea.
B. medusae B-555 Margaret River, WA, 2015 MH732870 MH732866 MH732861 MK211250 MK211255
B. cinerea Bc-7 Margaret River, WA, 2013 MH732872 MH732867 MH732862 MK211247 MK211252
Bc-385 McLaren Flat, SA, 2014 MH732873 MH732868 MH732863 MK211248 MK211253
Bc-410 Dixons Creek, VIC, 2015 MH732874 MH732869 MH732864 MK211249 MK211254
B. pseudocinerea Bp-362 Hunter Valley, NSW, 1980 MH732871 MH732865 MH732860 — MK211256
a
WA, Western Australia; SA, South Australia; VIC, Victoria; NSW, New South Wales.
drops of poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) were placed on 10-mm 555 and to validate whether B-555 and B. pseudocinerea
glass coverslips and allowed to dry overnight. Conidia from infected uninjured berries, isolates were recovered from infected
each isolate were then mounted on the poly-L-lysine coated cov- berries. Isolates were reisolated from three injured berries
erslips by pressing the coated side onto the sporulating area of infected with B-555 and three uninjured berries infected with B-
the peanut oatmeal agar plates. The conidia were fixed in 2.5% 555 and B. pseudocinerea. Species validation of these isolates
glutaraldehyde solution in sodium phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH was carried out via PCR-RLFP of the Bc-hch gene and growth
7.0) at 4 °C for 16 h. Samples were rinsed in sodium phosphate characteristics on PDA containing 2 lg mL1 fenhexamid.
buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0), then progressively dehydrated in a
graded series of ethanol in a Pelco biowave microwave (Ted
Pella Inc.), before critical-point drying (Polaron K3000 critical Bc-hch haplotyping
point dryer; Quorum Technologies Ltd) and mounted on stubs. To extract DNA, sporulation of all isolates was induced on
Samples were coated with 3 nm platinum in a Polaron SC 7640 PDA as described above. Spores and hyphae were scraped off
sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd) and imaged using a each plate using a sterile scalpel and placed in a 1.5 mL micro-
Supra FESEM (Zeiss) at 3 kV. centrifuge tube. Each sample was frozen in liquid nitrogen and
then ground using a sterile pestle. Genomic DNA was isolated
using a BioSprint 15 instrument and BioSprint DNA Plant kit
Assay of fenhexamid sensitivity
(QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR
Analysis of fenhexamid sensitivity of isolate B-555, B. cinerea was performed as described by Fournier et al. (2003), with some
isolates Bc-7, Bc-385 and Bc-410 and B. pseudocinerea isolate modifications. Due to failure to amplify a single band with the
Bp-362 was carried out as described by Zhou et al. (2014). 262/520L primer set, a new primer (hch1F, 50 -
Briefly, PDA plates were amended with technical grade fenhex- GTTTCGACCGGCTTTTACGG-30 ) was designed to replace
amid (Bayer) to final concentrations of 0.005, 0.0075, 0.01, primer 520L. This new primer added only 16 bp to the frag-
0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 1 and 2 lg mL1 for isolates of B-555 and ment, so had a negligible effect on the restriction profile. The
B. cinerea and to 2, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 75 lg mL1 for B. pseu- PCR mixture (in 25 lL) contained 40 ng DNA, 5 lL of 109
docinerea. One mycelial plug of each Botrytis species was placed MyTaq premix (Bioline), 0.5 lM of each primer and 1.25 U
on 90 mm Petri dishes containing each of the respective concen- MyTaq polymerase (Bioline). The subsequent thermal profile
trations, with a total of five replicates per concentration for each was as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min; followed
isolate. Plates were incubated in darkness at 20 °C and colony by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for
diameters were measured at 24 and 48 h. The experiment was 90 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 4 min. Five microlitres
performed twice. The mycelial growth rate was then used to cal- of each amplicon was digested with HhaI (New England Bio-
culate EC50 values as previously described by Leroux et al. labs) at 37 °C for 1.5 h as described by Fournier et al. (2003).
(1999).
Phylogenetic analysis
Virulence testing
To amplify the partial sequences of G3PDH, RPB2, HSP60,
A detached leaf assay (DLA) was carried out to investigate viru- NEP1 and NEP2 genes from the isolates, primer pairs
lence of B-555, B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea on young grape G3PDHfor/G3PDHrev, RPB2for/RPB2rev, HSP60for/HSP60rev,
leaves harvested in spring, as previously described by Zhou NEP1for/NEP1revB and NEP2forD/NEP2revD, respectively
et al. (2014) but with a number of modifications. Wine grape were used (Staats et al., 2005, 2007). PCR amplification was
leaves (Vitis vinifera ‘Muscat’) were used instead of table grape carried out as described by Staats et al. (2005). Amplified gene
leaves and the leaves were placed in plastic trays instead of products were confirmed on a 1% agarose gel and then sent to
enamelware. Each tray had either injured or uninjured leaves Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea) for sequencing.
and incubation was at room temperature instead of 20 °C. Partial sequences of the five genes from numerous Botrytis
When recording disease incidence, only complete diseased haloes species were also downloaded from GenBank release 219 (Ben-
were scored as disease. son et al., 2013). The species, accessions and references for these
A detached berry assay (DBA) was carried out to investigate sequences are detailed in Table S1. The genomes of isolates B-
virulence of B-555, B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea on wine 555 and Bp-362 (B. pseudocinerea) were previously sequenced
grape berries. Ripe wine grape berries (V. vinifera ‘Cabernet and assembled using PacBio long read technology (authors’
Sauvignon’) were harvested from the Curtin University experi- unpublished data). The partial sequences of G3PDH, RPB2,
mental vineyard and disinfected for 5 min in a solution contain- HSP60, NEP1 (NEP1 was not retrievable from the B. pseu-
ing 0.625% sodium hypochlorite and 10% ethanol. The berries docinerea genome) and NEP2 were extracted from these gen-
were then rinsed five times in dH2O and allowed to air dry. Ber- ome assemblies (authors’ unpublished data). To identify the
ries were attached to autoclave tape in sterile Petri dishes (six housekeeping gene fragments in these genomes of the Botrytis
berries per plate) before inoculation. spp., all downloaded sequences of each gene fragment were
To produce inoculum, conidia were harvested from peanut aligned to the assembly using EXONERATE v. 2.2.0 (Slater & Bir-
oatmeal agar as described above. Twelve berries per isolate were ney, 2005). The alignment was parsed using a Bash script and
inoculated with a 10 lL aliquot containing approximately 50 the coordinates and strand information from the alignments
conidia (5 9 103 conidia mL1 in H2O containing 0.03% were used to extract the corresponding sequences from the
Tween 20), with six berries injured with an 18G sterile needle Botrytis sp. assembly using BEDTOOLS v. 2.25.0 (Quinlan &
at the site of inoculation and six uninjured. Six injured and Hall, 2010).
uninjured berries were inoculated with 10 lL of H2O (contain- G3PDH, HSP60, RPB2, NEP1 and NEP2 gene sequences were
ing 0.03% Tween 20) as controls. All berries were incubated as aligned separately using MAFFT v. 6.42 (Katoh et al., 2002) with
described above for the DLA, except that the berries were incu- default settings. Poor quality regions of these alignments were
bated for 7 days. To fulfil Koch’s postulates (Koch, 1891) for B- removed using TRIMAL v. 1.2 (Capella-Gutierrez et al., 2009). The
trimmed alignments were then further trimmed using JALVIEW based on all five genes was constructed due to the low number of
(Clamp et al., 2004). This ensured that all sequences in the align- NEP1 and NEP2 sequences available.
ments were of equivalent length. The MAFFT alignments were then Trees were plotted using FIGTREE v. 1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.e
analysed with JMODELTEST v. 2.1.10 (Posada, 2009). The best d.ac.uk/software/figtree/) and manually coloured and annotated
nucleotide substitution model for each alignment was selected in INKSCAPE v. 0.17. To infer species clades, trees were assessed
based on the Bayesian information criterion test. Maximum-likeli- for concordance in topology in relation to B. medusae.
hood phylogenies were constructed for each of these alignments HSP60 sequences from this study, from endophytic Botrytis iso-
using PHYML v. 3.1 (Guindon et al., 2010). The settings used lates (Shipunov et al., 2008) and a number of B. cinerea, B. pseu-
were ‘-d nt -n 1 -b 1000 –run_id <run id> -m <model> -f m -v e -c docinerea and B. californica comparative isolates (Table S2) were
4 -a e –no_memory_check –r_seed 12345 -o tlr -s BEST –print_- aligned and a neighbour-joining consensus tree was constructed in
trace’ where ‘<model>’ represents the model code for the nucleo- GENEIOUS v. 6.1.8 software. The following parameters were used in
tide substitution model identified by JMODELTEST and ‘<run id>’ is the alignment; cost matrix: 65% similarity (5.0/4.0), gap pen-
a file identifier based on the name of the model. The setting ‘-b alty: 12, gap extension penalty: 3. The neighbour-joining consen-
1000’ was to generate bootstrap values from 1000 randomly sam- sus tree used the Tamura–Nei genetic distance model. The most
pled trees. In addition to the maximum-likelihood trees, a Baye- distant endophytic Botrytis sp. sequence (EU386596) was used as
sian tree was also produced based on a concatenated alignment of an out-group and bootstrap values less than 50% are not shown.
the G3PDH, HSP60 and RPB2 genes using MRBAYES v. 3.2.6
(Huelsenbeck & Ronquist, 2001). The concatenated alignment
was partitioned based on the sequences included (G3PDH, RPB2
Statistical analysis
or HSP60) and the nucleotide substitution model was allowed to All statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS software (IBM). Fen-
vary between each of the partitions. No concatenated alignment hexamid sensitivity, number of sclerotia per plate, conidiophore
Table 2 Mycelial growth and morphological characteristics of Botrytis medusae, B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea on potato dextrose agar at 20 °C.
Mean
Species and Growth (mm Mean no. length Mean Length:
isolate per day) Size (mm) per dish Size (lm) (lm) Size (lm) (lm) width
B. medusae
B-555 14.0 a 1.5–9.5 9 1.3–3.9 82 c 968–2040 9 10–20 1506 b 6.5–15.8 9 4.6–11.0 10.2 9 7.9 1.29
B. cinerea
Bc-7 14.9 b 1.6–9.0 9 1.7–4.0 42 b 1120–2324 9 12–21 1634 b 7.2–16.4 9 5.8–12.2 10.5 9 8.5 1.24 ns
Bc-385 17.3 d 2.4–9.9 9 1.2–5.2 36 b 1126–2169 9 12–22 1642 b 6.4–14.2 9 4.5–9.9 9.3 9 7.1 1.32 ns
Bc-410 15.8 c 1.5–8.0 9 1.0–4.1 26 a 898–2599 9 13–25 1599 b 6.3–15.7 9 5.0–10.7 10.9 9 7.9 1.38 ns
B. pseudocinerea
Bp-362 16.2 c 1.4–9.5 9 1.3–9.5 52 d 766–1745 9 10–18 1277 a 7.2–20.6 9 5.8–12.1 11.6 9 8.5 1.36 ns
Mean values within the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Waller–Duncan t-test (P = 0.05).
ns, no significant difference according to Student’s t-test (P > 0.05) when compared to B. medusae.
20
B. cinerea
18
B. pseudocinerea
Radial growth rate (mm day–1)
16
B. medusae *
14
*
12
c Results
(means = 35 and 52 per plate, respectively; Table 2). In after 7 days of incubation on PDA (25% strength) under
morphological comparison with the group I species, sporulating conditions (Fig. 2d–f). The average conidio-
B. sinoviticola and B. californica, isolate B-555 had a phore lengths were 1506, 1625 and 1277 lm for B-555,
lower sclerotia count (P < 0.05) compared to those B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea, respectively (Table 2).
found in B. sinoviticola isolates (mean range 179–266; Comparison of the conidial surfaces of Bc-7, Bp-362 and
Zhou et al., 2014) and in B. californica isolates (mean B-555 revealed no obvious differences (Fig. 2g–i).
range 204–790; Saito et al., 2016). In the assay of fenhexamid sensitivity, the fenhexamid
To investigate the morphology of each species under EC50 values for B-555, B. cinerea (average) and B. pseu-
sporulating conditions, each species was grown on PDA docinerea isolates were 0.029, 0.014 and
for 2 days at room temperature under a 12 h near-UV 10.55 lg mL1, respectively (Fig. 3).
light/12 h dark cycle. Under these conditions, B-555
produced fluffy aerial mycelia, whereas B. cinerea and
Isolate B-555 is less virulent on grape leaves and
B. pseudocinerea did not (Fig. 2a–c). The average length:
berries than B. cinerea but similar to B. pseudocinerea
width ratio of conidia of B-555 was 1.29, compared
with 1.31 and 1.36 for B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea, To test whether the virulence of B-555 was different to
respectively, and was not significantly different (P > 0.05, that of isolates of the known species B. cinerea and
Table 2). Unlike B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea, B-555 B. pseudocinerea, virulence assays were conducted on
produced conidiophores with long branched extensions wine grape leaves and wine grapes (Fig. 4a–d).
(b)
Uninj.
Inj.
80 Uninjured Uninjured
** ** 15 (Bp-362) and B. medusae (B-555); (d) mean
60
** lesion diameter (mm) from leaf infection
10 caused by B. cinerea (Bc-7, Bc-385, Bc-
40 ** ** 410), B. pseudocinerea (Bp-362) and
B. medusae (B-555). Mean values were
5
20 calculated using only measurements from
complete disease haloes. ** indicate
0 0 significant difference at P < 0.01 using
Bc-7 Bc-385 Bc-410 Bp-362 B-555 Bc-7 Bc-385 Bc-410 Bp-362 B-555
Student’s t-test.
Isolate Isolate
M Group II Group I
700 bp-
500 bp-
300 bp-
100 bp-
Figure 5 Restriction profiles of Botrytis
cinerea (Bc-7, Bc-385, Bc-410),
B. pseudocinerea (Bp-362) and B. medusae
(B-555) isolates after digestion of the Bc-hch
gene amplicons with the enzyme HhaI,
indicating the Botrytis group (I, II) to which
they belong. M = DNA marker. Isolate
their taxonomic placement and utility as controls for the Whitish colonies produced on PDA, with mycelial
morphological assays. growth on PDA optimal at 25 °C, growing at a mean
increase in diameter of 15.65 mm per day (Fig. 1).
Abundant grey to black sclerotia produced on PDA at
Taxonomy of B. medusae
20 °C with sclerotia singular or aggregated, irregular,
Botrytis medusae, L. A. Harper, M. C. Derbyshire, F. J. spherical to elliptical, 1.5–9.5 9 1.3–3.9 mm
Lopez-Ruiz, sp. nov., Figs 1–4. Mycobank number: (Table 2). White aerial mycelia produced among coni-
MB827445. Ex-type culture = DAR83531 (NSW DPI, diophores under sporulating conditions on PDA at
Australia). room temperature (Fig. 2c). Conidiophores alternately
Etymology: refers to the unique formation of long branched at top, straight, septate, brown, 968–
branched conidiophore extensions on 25% strength PDA 2040 9 10–20 lm (Table 2). On 25% strength PDA,
at room temperature under a 12 h/12 h near-UV light/ produces long branched conidiophore extensions
dark cycle for 7 days. (Fig. 2f). Conidia in botryose clusters, elliptical to
Figure 6 Molecular phylogeny of Botrytis species, using Monilinia fructigena and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as out-groups, in a maximum-likelihood
tree inferred from the dataset based on the partial DNA sequences of HSP60. The numbers at each node indicate the bootstrap percentage
(n = 1000). Bootstrap support values less than 90% are not shown. The isolates B-555 (B. medusae), Bp-362 (B. pseudocinerea) and Bc-7, Bc-410
and Bc-385 (B. cinerea) are shown in blue, green and purple, respectively.
ovoid, unicellular, hyaline to pale brown, mean isolate of B. medusae was assessed. Seifert & Rossman
10.2 9 7.9 lm (Table 2). (2010) proposed that authors could potentially make a
Holotype: AUSTRALIA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, strong case for describing a new fungal species if there is
Margaret River, conidia stored in glycerol at 80 °C of strong evidence but limited biological material.
isolate B-555 from diseased berry of Vitis vinifera Botrytis medusae had a higher mycelial growth rate at
‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, April 2015, L. A. Harper, M. C. 30 °C (>4 mm per day; P < 0.01) than the other Botrytis
Derbyshire, F. J. Lopez-Ruiz. species (≤2 mm per day), B. cinerea, B. pseudocinerea,
B. sinoviticola (Zhou et al., 2014) and B. californica
(Saito et al., 2016). This higher mycelial growth rate
Discussion
could be an adaption to the southwestern Australian cli-
In this study, a new Botrytis species found on wine mate. Recently, another member of the Botrytis cryptic
grapes is proposed, Botrytis medusae. The major limiting species complex (BCSC) has been identified, B. eucalypti
factor in pronouncing a new species here is that only one (Liu et al., 2016). However, unlike B. medusae,
Figure 7 Molecular phylogeny of Botrytis species, using Monilinia fructigena and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as out-groups, in a maximum-likelihood
tree inferred from the dataset based on the partial DNA sequence of RPB2. The numbers at each node indicate the bootstrap percentage
(n = 1000). Bootstrap support values less than 90% are not shown. The isolates B-555 (B. medusae), Bp-362 (B. pseudocinerea) and Bc-7, Bc-410
and Bc-385 (B. cinerea) are shown in blue, green and purple, respectively.
B. eucalypti could not grow on PDA at 5 °C and, also in appear different from that reported for B. sinoviticola
contrast to B. medusae, B. eucalypti did not have a (Zhou et al., 2014), but did appear lower than has been
mycelial growth rate of >4 mm per day on PDA at found for conidia of B. californica (Saito et al., 2016)
30 °C (Liu et al., 2016). Botrytis medusae had a higher and B. calthae (Plesken et al., 2015a). Botrytis medusae
sclerotia count than B. cinerea and B. pseudocinerea does not have villiform appendages on the surface of the
(P < 0.05) and a lower sclerotia count (P < 0.05) com- conidia that have been found in B. sinoviticola isolates
pared to those found in B. sinoviticola isolates (mean (Zhou et al., 2014) and has normal length conidiophores
range = 179–266; Zhou et al., 2014) and B. californica (mean = 1506 lm) compared with the long conidio-
isolates (mean range = 204—790; Saito et al., 2016). In phores (mean = 7455 lm) found in B. californica iso-
contrast to B. calthae, B. medusae did not produce scle- lates (Saito et al., 2016). On PDA, B. medusae uniquely
rotia within agar or at the bottom of the Petri dish (Hen- produced conidiophores with long branched extensions.
nebert & Groves, 1963). The conidial length:width ratio Botrytis medusae was distinguished phenotypically
of B. medusae was not significantly different from those from B. pseudocinerea in its sensitivity to fenhexamid.
of B. cinerea, B. pseudocinerea (P < 0.05), nor did it Natural resistance to fenhexamid is very significant in
Figure 8 Molecular phylogeny of Botrytis species, using Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as an out-group, in a maximum-likelihood tree inferred from the
dataset based on the partial DNA sequence of NEP1. The numbers at each node indicate the bootstrap percentage (n = 1000). Bootstrap support
values less than 90% are not shown. The isolates B-555 (B. medusae), and Bc-7, Bc-410 and Bc-385 (B. cinerea) are shown in blue and purple,
respectively.
B. pseudocinerea, but other group I species such as B. me- study, mycelial rather than conidial inoculum was used,
dusae, B. sinoviticola and B. californica have EC50 values and table grapes instead of wine grapes.
within the sensitive range found in B. cinerea (Leroux Botrytis medusae was distinguishable from related
et al., 1999; Zhou et al., 2014; Saito et al., 2016). Botry- Botrytis species based on phylogenetic analysis involving
tis cinerea isolates that are sensitive to fenhexamid have five nuclear genes. This analysis gave clear evidence for
been found to have an EC50 value within the range of B. medusae being positioned in its own unique clade.
0.008–0.129 lg mL1 (Leroux et al., 1999; Ma & Botrytis medusae is a sister lineage to Botrytis clade I, as
Michailides, 2005; Saito et al., 2014). As only one type defined by Staats et al. (2005), which includes B. califor-
strain has been identified in this study, it is not possible to nica, B. calthae, B. cinerea, B. eucalypti, B. fabae,
extrapolate the moderate decrease in fungicide sensitivity B. pelargonii, B. pseudocinerea and B. sinoviticola. The
to the entire species without further experimentation. placement of B. medusae in a lineage related to clade I
In tests of virulence, B. medusae caused disease on indicates it is unlikely to be the same species as a novel
uninjured grape berries. In contrast, investigations by clade II endophytic Botrytis sp. found on dandelion by
Zhou et al. (2014) showed that B. sinoviticola could not Shaw et al. (2016). Walker et al. (2011) confirmed that
cause disease on uninjured grapes; however, in that a reproductive barrier between B. cinerea (group II) and
Figure 9 Molecular phylogeny of Botrytis species, using Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as out-group, in a maximum-likelihood tree inferred from the
dataset based on the partial DNA sequence of NEP2. The numbers at each node indicate the bootstrap percentage (n = 1000). Bootstrap support
values less than 90% are not shown. The isolates B-555 (B. medusae), Bp-362 (B. pseudocinerea) and Bc-7, Bc-410 and Bc-385 (B. cinerea) are
shown in blue, green and purple, respectively.
B. pseudocinerea (group I) exists by investigating crosses plants (Barnes & Shaw, 2003; Sowley et al., 2009; Grant-
of the two species. It remains to be determined if this Downton et al., 2014; Shaw et al., 2016). Shaw et al.
barrier exists between other group I species and (2016) found B. cinerea, B. pseudocinerea, B. mali iso-
B. cinerea, or whether these barriers exist between group lates and an undescribed Botrytis sp. existing as cryptic
I species. However, because B. medusae was living in infections in dandelion. An alignment of partial HSP60
apparent sympatry with B. cinerea and is unlikely to be sequences from reported endophytic Botrytis spp. identi-
a hybrid between B. cinerea and another species based fied in spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe; Shipunov
on multiple gene phylogenies, it is probable that this et al., 2008) with B. medusae, B. californica, B. pseu-
reproductive barrier exists. docinerea and B. cinerea partial HSP60 sequences show
Recently, several Botrytis species were shown to exhibit that these Botrytis spp. are related to endophytic species
endophytic stages in their lifecycles in a range of flowering (Fig. S1, Table S2). Thus, B. medusae and, potentially,
Figure 10 Molecular phylogeny of Botrytis species, using Monilinia fructigena and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as out-groups, in a Bayesian tree inferred
from the dataset based on the concatenated partial DNA sequences of G3PDH, RPB2 and HSP60. The numbers at each node indicate the posterior
probability for tree topology. The isolates B-555 (B. medusae), Bp-362 (B. pseudocinerea) and Bc-7, Bc-410 and Bc-385 (B. cinerea) are shown in
blue, green and purple, respectively. Coloured boxes indicate different species of Botrytis. This tree exhibited the least discrepancy of all trees,
generally grouping Botrytis species into distinct clades.
other group I species including B. pseudocinerea and Nicot et al., 2011; van Lenteren et al., 2018). For exam-
B. californica, may be strong candidates for further inves- ple, in grapes, management strategies could potentially
tigation of the endophytic stages of Botrytis species. involve ways to increase the frequency of Botrytis species
Understanding the contributions of cryptic Botrytis in low abundance (e.g. B. pseudocinerea, B. sinoviticola,
species living in sympatry could provide information for B. californica, B. euroamericana, B. medusae and
improvement of disease management strategies (Walker, B. prunorum) as a means to induce host resistance at
2016). Numerous microorganisms have been tested as flowering or competitively exclude the highly aggressive
biocontrol agents against B. cinerea, with a small num- and fungicide-resistance-prone B. cinerea. In vineyards,
ber of these currently commercially available (Nicot B. pseudocinerea is common at flowering but not late in
et al., 2011; van Lenteren et al., 2018). Some of these the season, which appears to be due to ecological niche
microorganisms can act as inducers of host resistance or factors and the impact of fungicide application (Walker
as natural competitors, which can lower disease suscepti- et al., 2011; Johnston et al., 2014; Plesken et al.,
bility of the host (Pal & McSpadden Gardener, 2006; 2015b). Furthermore, B. pseudocinerea is hypersensitive
Figure 11 Molecular phylogeny of Botrytis species, using Monilinia fructigena and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as out-groups, in a maximum-likelihood
tree inferred from the dataset based on the partial DNA sequence of G3PDH. The numbers at each node indicate the bootstrap percentage
(n = 1000). Bootstrap support values less than 90% are not shown. The isolates B-555 (B. medusae), Bp-362 (B. pseudocinerea) and Bc-7, Bc-410
and Bc-385 (B. cinerea) are shown in blue, green and purple, respectively.
to some fungicides in vitro and development of resistance Fournier E, Giraud T, Albertini C, Brygoo Y, 2005. Partition of the
to fungicides appears to be very rare in this species Botrytis cinerea complex in France using multiple gene genealogies.
Mycologia 97, 1251–67.
(Fournier et al., 2003; Walker et al., 2011; Plesken
Garfinkel AR, Lorenzini M, Zapparoli G, Chastagner GA, 2017. Botrytis
et al., 2015b). Therefore, B. pseudocinerea could be used euroamericana, a new species from peony and grape in North America
as a potential early season biocontrol agent against and Europe. Mycologia 109, 495–507.
B. cinerea but could still be controlled through fungicide Giraud T, Fortini D, Levis C, Leroux P, Brygoo Y, 1997. RFLP markers
application if necessary, with a low likelihood of devel- show genetic recombination in Botryotinia fuckeliana (Botrytis
opment of resistance. Other cryptic sympatric species of cinerea) and transposable elements reveal two sympatric species.
Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 1177–85.
Botrytis may have similar traits to B. pseudocinerea and
Giraud T, Fortini D, Levis C et al., 1999. Two sibling species of the
may also be potentially harnessed to reduce the impact Botrytis cinerea complex, transposa and vacuma, are found in
of B. cinerea within a field setting. sympatry on numerous host plants. Phytopathology 89, 967–73.
The isolation and characterization of new B. medusae Grant-Downton RT, Terhem RB, Kapralov MV et al., 2014. A novel
isolates would provide further support for this new spe- Botrytis species is associated with a newly emergent foliar disease in
cies. It is likely that, in Australia, B. medusae is present cultivated hemerocallis. PLoS ONE 9, e89272.
in low frequencies in the field, as found for other group I Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel
O, 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-
isolates in other countries (Walker et al., 2011; Zhou
likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PHYML 3.0.
et al., 2014; Saito et al., 2016). However, studies into Systematic Biology 59, 307–21.
the frequency of B. medusae in vineyards and potentially Hennebert GL, Groves JW, 1963. Three new species of Botryotinia on
on other Botrytis susceptible crops in Australia are neces- Ranunculaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 41, 341–70.
sary to support this theory. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of
phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754–5.
Johnston PR, Hoksbergen K, Park D, Beever RE, 2014.
Acknowledgements Genetic diversity of Botrytis in New Zealand vineyards and the
significance of its seasonal and regional variation. Plant Pathology
The authors would like to thank Derek Zhong for his 63, 888–98.
assistance in completing some of the morphological tests. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyate T, 2002. MAFFT: a novel method
The authors would also like to thank Kim Plummer (La for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform.
Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia) for providing Nucleic Acids Research 30, 3059–66.
Koch R, 1891. Uber bakteriologische Forschung. In: Proceedings of the
the Botrytis isolate characterized as B. pseudocinerea
German Xth International Congress of Medicine, 1890. Berlin,
and for critical reading of the manuscript. This work Germany: Verlag Von August Hirschwald, band I, 35.
was funded by Wine Australia (SAR1204 and SAR1702) van Lenteren JC, Bolckmans K, K€ ohl J, Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A,
and Curtin University (Perth, Australia). 2018. Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms:
plenty of new opportunities. BioControl 63, 39–59.
Leroux P, Chapeland F, Desbrosses D, Gredt M, 1999. Patterns of
References cross-resistance to fungicides in Botryotinia fuckeliana (Botrytis
Albertini C, Thebaud G, Fournier E, Leroux P, 2002. Eburicol 14a- cinerea) isolates from French vineyards. Crop Protection 18,
demethylase gene (CYP51) polymorphism and speciation in Botrytis 687–97.
cinerea. Mycological Research 106, 1171–8. Liu QL, Li GQ, Li JQ, Chen SF, 2016. Botrytis eucalypti, a novel species
Barnes SE, Shaw MW, 2003. Infection of commercial hybrid primula isolated from diseased Eucalyptus seedlings in South China.
seed by Botrytis cinerea and latent disease spread through the plants. Mycological Progress 15, 1057–79.
Phytopathology 93, 573–8. Lorenzini M, Zapparoli G, 2014. An isolate morphologically and
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K et al., 2013. GenBank. Nucleic phylogenetically distinct from Botrytis cinerea obtained from withered
Acids Research 41, D36–42. grapes possibly represents a new species of Botrytis. Plant Pathology
Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T, 2009. TRIMAI: a 63, 1326–35.
tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic Ma Z, Michailides TJ, 2005. Genetic structure of Botrytis cinerea
analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–3. populations from different host plants in California. Plant Disease 10,
Carisse O, 2016. Epidemiology and aerobiology of Botrytis spp. In: 1083–9.
Fillinger S, Elad Y, eds. Botrytis – the Fungus, the Pathogen and its Nicot PC, Bardin M, Alabouvette C, 2011. Potential of biological control
Management in Agricultural Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer based on published research. 1. Protection against plant pathogens of
International Publishing, 127–48. selected crops. In: Nicot PC, ed. Classical and Augmentative Biological
Clamp M, Cuff J, Searle SM, Barton GJ, 2004. The JALVIEW Java Control Against Diseases and Pests: Critical Status Analysis and
alignment editor. Bioinformatics 20, 426–7. Review of Factors Influencing their Success. Zurich, Switzerland:
Elmer PAG, Michailides TJ, 2007. Epidemiology of Botrytis cinerea in International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of
orchard and vine crops. In: Elad Y, Williamson B, Tudzynski P, Delen Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palaearctic Regional Section, 1–11.
N, eds. Botrytis: Biology, Pathology and Control. Dordrecht, Pal KK, McSpadden Gardener B, 2006. Biological control of plant
Netherlands: Springer, 243–72. pathogens. The Plant Health Instructor. https://doi.org/10.1094/phi-a-
Fillinger S, Leroux P, Auclair C, Barreau C, Al Hajj C, Debieu D, 2008. 2006-1117-02.
Genetic analysis of fenhexamid-resistant field isolates of the Plesken C, Westrich LD, Hahn M, 2015a. Genetic and
phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Antimicrobial Agents and phenotypic characterization of Botrytis calthae. Plant Pathology 64,
Chemotherapy 52, 3933–40. 128–34.
Fournier E, Levis C, Fortini D, Leroux P, Giraud T, Brygoo Y, 2003. Plesken C, Weber RW, Rupp S, Leroch M, Hahn M, 2015b. Botrytis
Characterization of Bc-hch, the Botrytis cinerea homolog of the pseudocinerea is a significant pathogen of several crop plants but
Neurospora crassa het-c vegetative incompatibility locus, and its use as susceptible to displacement by fungicide-resistant B. cinerea strains.
a population marker. Mycologia 95, 251–61. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81, 7048–56.
Posada D, 2009. Selection of models of DNA evolution with Walker AS, 2016. Diversity within and between species of Botrytis. In:
JMODELTEST. In: Posada D, ed. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Fillinger S, Elad Y, eds. Botrytis – the Fungus, the Pathogen and its
Analysis. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press, 93–112. Management in Agricultural Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer
Quinlan AR, Hall IM, 2010. BEDTOOLS: a flexible suite of utilities for International Publishing, 91–126.
comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–2. Walker AS, Gautier A, Confais J et al., 2011. Botrytis
Saito KA, Cadle-Davidson L, Wilcox FW, 2014. Selection, fitness and pseudocinerea, a new cryptic species causing gray mold in French
control of grape isolates of Botrytis cinerea variably sensitive to vineyards in sympatry with Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology 101,
fenhexamid. Plant Disease 98, 233–40. 1433–45.
Saito S, Margosan D, Michailides TJ, Xiao CL, 2016. Botrytis californica, Zhang J, Wu MD, Li GQ et al., 2010. Botrytis fabiopsis, a new species
a new cryptic species in the B. cinerea species complex causing gray causing chocolate spot of broad bean in central China. Mycologia 102,
mold in blueberries and table grapes. Mycologia 108, 330–43. 1114–26.
Seifert KA, Rossman AY, 2010. How to describe a new fungal species. Zhou YJ, Zhang J, Wang XD et al., 2014. Morphological and
IMA Fungus 1, 109–16. phylogenetic identification of Botrytis sinoviticola, a novel cryptic
Shaw MW, Emmanuel CJ, Emilda D et al., 2016. Analysis of cryptic, species causing gray mold disease of table grapes (Vitis vinifera) in
systemic Botrytis infections in symptomless hosts. Frontiers in Plant China. Mycologia 106, 43–56.
Science 7, 625.
Shipunov A, Newcombe G, Raghavendra AKH, Anderson CL, 2008. Supporting Information
Hidden diversity of endophytic fungi in an invasive plant. American
Journal of Botany 95, 1096–108. Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of
Slater GSC, Birney E, 2005. Automated generation of heuristics for this article at the publisher’s web-site.
biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 31. Figure S1. Neighbour-joining consensus tree of partial HSP60
Sowley E, Dewey FM, Shaw M, 2009. Persistent, symptomless, systemic, sequences from endophytic Botrytis spp. identified in spotted knapweed
and seed-borne infection of lettuce by Botrytis cinerea. European (Centaurea stoebe) by Shipunov et al. (2008) and B. cinerea, B. medusae,
Journal of Plant Pathology 126, 61–71. B. californica and B. pseudocinerea isolates. * indicates the sequences of
Speakman JB, Pommer EH, 1986. A simple method for producing large the 10 endophytic Botrytis spp. reported in Shipunov et al. (2008). The
volumes of Pyrenophora teres spore suspension. Bulletin of the British most distant endophytic Botrytis spp. sequence (EU386596) was used as
Mycological Society 20, 129–30. an out-group and bootstrap values less than 50% are not shown. Species,
Staats M, van Baarlen P, van Kan JAL, 2005. Molecular phylogeny of GenBank accession numbers and references of sequences used in this tree
the plant pathogenic genus Botrytis and the evolution of host are shown in Table S2.
specificity. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22, 333–46. Table S1. Species, collection ID, geographic location, GenBank acces-
Staats M, van Baarlen P, Schouten A, van Kan JAL, Bakker FT, 2007. sion numbers and references for all the DNA sequences used in phyloge-
Positive selection in phytotoxic protein-encoding genes of Botrytis netic analyses.
species. Fungal Genetics and Biology 44, 52–63. Table S2. Species, collection ID, geographic location, GenBank acces-
Stergiopoulos I, Gordon TR, 2014. Cryptic fungal infections: the hidden sion numbers and references for all the DNA sequences used in phyloge-
agenda of plant pathogens. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 506. netic analyses of endophytic Botrytis spp. and comparative sequences.