Tube in Tube Structure 2017 PDF
Tube in Tube Structure 2017 PDF
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Lately, Framed tube and framed tube in tube connectivity and gravity loads. Both the frames are
structures have been broadly utilized as framework for tall connected by beams or truss. It is to be noted that in tubular
structures. Framed tube structure with various internal tube structure help in resistance of the structure due to lateral
or tubes in tube structure, are generally utilized in view of load.
their high solidness in opposing horizontal load and the
accessibility of inside tubes in supporting the vertical tubes. At 1.2 TUBE IN TUBE STRCUTURE
the point when subjected to parallel load, for example, wind
load, the corner sections encounter considerably higher axial Tube in Tube is most common used type of tubular
load because of the notable amount of shear lag. The structure. Here the structure consist of internal tube, thus the
investigation is completed in ETABS V15. Here behavior of name. The internal tube can be used for movement between
Tubular. The impact conduct of tall tubular structures with the floors i.e. can be used to provide stair case, lift room. Even
truss around the peripherals, and the investigation the impact though Tube in Tube Structure help in resisting lateral loads
of column spacing on arrangement of truss individuals for acting the structure, the lateral loads are mostly resisted by
the external tubes of the structure.
tubular structure is completed.
Key Words: Framed Tube, Framed Tube in tube, axial load, 1.3 OBJECTIVES
Seismic load, wind load, ETABS, Steel Tube Truss.
1. Comparative analysis between tube in tube
1. INTRODUCTION structure and moment resisting structure. With
static and dynamic loads in high seismic zones.
Due to limited area and increasing expansion of urbanisation
it is feasible to expand in vertical direction than in horizontal 2. To study the behavior of the tubular structure in
direction. And due to increasing vertical urbanisation it is variation of the column spacing.
important to adopt to more stable structure. Here, tubular 3. To study the behavior of the tubular structure with
structure is one such structure, where the columns are X bracing on the structure.
placed at the periphery of the structure. Also here Tube in
Tube structure is used. Compared to conventional structure 4. Results are compared between the models with
the tube in tube structure is more stable lateral loads, allows respect to Base shear, Displacement, Drift, Time
more interior space and helps save around 30% steel. Here period, Stiffness.
five models are done having tube in tube structure with
different column spacing and also providing X bracing to 1.4 METHODOLOGY
them.
1. In the present examination a 50 storied Steel
building is considered, having general arrangement
1.1 TUBULAR STRUCTURE
measurement of 48 m x 48 m along X and Y course.
Tubular structure is a type of structure where, the columns 2. Steel structure is with floating columns are displayed.
are placed on the periphery of the building. There are 3. To examination the impact of general execution of the
different types of tubular structure- Framed tube structure, structure, steel X bracings are given.
Tube in Tube structure, Bundled Tube structure, Braced tube
Structure. These structure are basically designed to act like a 4. X bracings at various area at various statures are
hollow tube which are perpendicular to the ground. These considered.
building are basically made of Steel, concrete or composite of 5. Total five models are viewed as one customary steel
both. structure, two Tube in Tube structure with floating columns
and two models with bracing.
In these structure external frame takes the lateral loads like
seismic, wind. The interior frame takes care of the
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 807
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
6. Equivalent static and dynamic time history analysis 2.3 PLAN VIEW OF THE BUIDING
is completed using ETAB Ver. 2015.
7. Important outcomes like displacements, story drifts,
peak displacements, base force and acceleration are shown.
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 808
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 809
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
3.3 MAXIMUM STORY DISPLACEMENT 3.5 BASE SHEAR RESULTS – DYNAMIC TIME
HISTORY
Chart -3: Maximum Story Displacement Chart-5: Base Shear – Dynamic Time History
Chart -4: Story Displacement – Dynamic Time History 3.7 BASE SHEAR - WIND LOAD
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 810
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
REFERENCES
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 811
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 10 | Oct -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
6. Abdul Kadir Marsono and Lee Siong Wee, “Nonlinear Structure in Tall Buildings", proc. of "Tall Buildings
Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Tube from Engineering to Sustainability, Hong Kong
in Tube of Tall Buildings”, Proceedings of the 6th Asia-
Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction 17. Bungule S Taranath, "Structural Analysis and Design of
Conference (APSEC 2006), 5– 6 September 2006, Tall Buildings", McGraw Hill Book Company,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Singapore, p l 30 311 - 340 1988.
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 812