Scribd
Upload
75 views

Lab2 Solutions

This document discusses solutions to an exercise sheet on object-oriented programming in C++. It provides examples of a Bank account class with methods like deposit() and withdraw(). It also shows a Bank class that holds a vector of Account objects and allows adding accounts and printing their details. Methods like deposit() and withdraw() on the Bank class must search the vector to find the right account to modify. The document notes some improvements that could be made to these methods.

Uploaded by

Humayun Naseer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
75 views

Lab2 Solutions

This document discusses solutions to an exercise sheet on object-oriented programming in C++. It provides examples of a Bank account class with methods like deposit() and withdraw(). It also shows a Bank class that holds a vector of Account objects and allows adding accounts and printing their details. Methods like deposit() and withdraw() on the Bank class must search the vector to find the right account to modify. The document notes some improvements that could be made to these methods.

Uploaded by

Humayun Naseer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Module IN3013/INM173 – Object-Oriented

Programming in C++
Solutions to Exercise Sheet 2

1. Here is a simple bank account class:

class Account {
string name;
double balance;

public:
Account(string n) : name(n), balance(0) {}
Account(string n, double initial_balance) :
name(n), balance(initial_balance) {}

string get_name() const { return name; }


double get_balance() const { return balance; }

void deposit(double amount) {


balance += amount;
}

void withdraw(double amount) {


balance -= amount;
}
};

Note we have two kinds of member functions (methods) here:

• pure functions, like get name and get balance, that return data and do not
change the object, as indicated by const.
• procedures, like deposit and withdraw, whose purpose is to change the object,
but do not return anything, as indicated by void.

Separating the methods this way makes the class easier to understand, but many
classes have methods that both change the state and return something.

2. This is achieved by the above class, which supplies constructors, but not a default one.
The compiler will only generate a default constructor for a class if no constructors
are supplied by the programmer.

1
3. Here is the class with all the active code removed:

class Account {
string name;
double balance;

public:
Account(string n);
Account(string n, double initial_balance);

string get_name() const;


double get_balance() const;

void deposit(double amount);


void withdraw(double amount);
};

Now the constructors will be defined outside the class, and so must be qualified with
the class name:

Account::Account(string n) : name(n), balance(0) {}


Account::Account(string n, double initial_balance) :
name(n), balance(initial_balance) {}

Similarly the methods must be qualified when they are defined in this way:

string Account::get_name() const { return name; }


double Account::get_balance() const { return balance; }

void Account::deposit(double amount) {


balance += amount;
}

void Account::withdraw(double amount) {


balance -= amount;
}

Note that the fields of the class are still accessible inside the constructors and meth-
ods, just as if they had been defined inside the class.

4. Here is a bank class with a collection of accounts:

2
class Bank {
vector<Account> account;

public:
void add_account(const Account &acct) {
account.push_back(acct);
}

void print_accounts() const {


for (int i = 0; i < account.size(); i++)
cout << account[i].get_name() << ": " <<
account[i].get_balance() << ’\n’;
}
};

No constructor is specified, so the compiler will generate a default constructor, with


initializes the vector field with its default constructor. This initializes account as an
empty vector, which is what we want.
The add account procedure take an Account object by reference, to avoid a copy,
but declares it const to indicate that it will not chance the Account object argument.
The push back method enlarges the vector, initializing the new Account object in
the vector as a copy of acct.
The print accounts procedure loops through the vector in the usual way. Note that
the body refers to account[i] twice. We could have written the method to declare
an alias (reference) to account[i], as follows:

void print_accounts() const {


for (int i = 0; i < account.size(); i++) {
const Account &acct = account[i];
cout << acct.get_name() << ": " <<
acct.get_balance() << ’\n’;
}
}

Note that the reference acct must also be declared const, indicating that the
Account object will not be changed, and required by the const in the procedure
declaration.

5. Here is a simple version of deposit and withdraw:

void deposit(string name, double amount) {


for (int i = 0; i < account.size(); i++)
if (account[i].get_name() == name)

3
account[i].deposit(amount);
}

void withdraw(string name, double amount) {


for (int i = 0; i < account.size(); i++)
if (account[i].get_name() == name)
account[i].withdraw(amount);
}

These implementations are flawed, because they keep going after finding a matching
name. They also terminate successfully if the name was not found, which would be
inappropriate in a real bank.
We could also have used references as in the previous part, but this time the references
would not be const, as we’re modifying the objects they refer to.

6. Again we loop through the accounts in the vector, doing the same thing to each:

void add_interest(double rate) {


for (int i = 0; i < account.size(); i++)
account[i].deposit(
account[i].get_balance() * rate / 100);
}

You might also like