2006 1 Equi Polygons PDF
2006 1 Equi Polygons PDF
An algebraic approach
Titu Andreescu Bogdan Enescu
University of Texas at Dallas "B.P. Hasdeu" National College
Buzau, Romania
The converse of the statement is not true. For instance, if a; b; c; d are the side
lengths of a quadrilateral and a+bi+ci2 +di3 = 0; then (a c)+i(b d) = 0; this
equality is ful…lled if the quadrilateral is a parallelogram (and not necessarily an
equiangular quadrilateral, that is, a rectangle). However, from the proof we see
AB = a1 + a2 + a6 ;
BC = a2 + a3 + a4 ;
CA = a4 + a5 + a6:
On the other hand, since "3 = 1 (and " 6= 1) we see that "2 "+1 = 0: Thus,
" is a common root of the equations (a1 a4 ) + (a2 a5 )z + (a3 a6 )z 2 = 0 and
as desired.
AB EF = DE + F G AH BC = 0:
CD GH = F G + AH DE BC = 0:
a1 + a2 " + : : : + a8 "7 = 0;
where " = cos 28 +i sin 28 : Observing that "4 = 1; the above equality becomes
Thus, " is a common root of the polynomials with rational coe¢ cients f (X) =
X 4 + 1 and g (X) = a1 a5 + (a2 a6 ) X + (a3 a7 ) X 2 + (a4 a8 ) X 3 : If g is
a non-constant polynomial, we derive that gcd (f; g) is a non-constant rational
polynomial, which is a contradiction since f is irreducible in Q [X] (to see this,
observe that its roots are nonreal, so the only way it can
p be written as approduct
of polynomials with real coe¢ cients is f = x2 + x 2 + 1 x2 x 2 + 1 ).
Therefore, g must be a constant and this implies that the opposite sides of the
octagon are equal and parallel. The solution ends like the previous one.
Since cos 72 is not a rational number, the above equalities imply both AB =
DE and CD = BC: The conclusion follows easily.
Second solution. We can prove more:
P (X) = a1 + a2 X + : : : ap X p 1
:
Q(X) = 1 + X + X 2 + : : : + X p 1
:
Because the two polynomials share a common root, their greatest common di-
visor must be a non-constant polynomial with rational coe¢ cients.This implies
that Q can be factorized as a product of two non-constant polynomials with
rational coe¢ cients, which is impossible (to prove that, one applies the Eisen-
stein’s criterion to the polynomial Q(X + 1) ). Conversely, suppose p is not a
prime number and let p = mn; for some positive integers m; n > 1: It results
that n is a root of order m of the unity, hence 1 + n + 2n + : : : + (m 1)n = 0:
If we add this equality to 1 + + 2 + 3 + : : : + p 1 = 0; we deduce that
is the root of a polynomial of degree p 1; with some coe¢ cients equal to 1
and the others equal to 2. This means that there exists an equiangular polygon
with p sides, some of length 1 and the rest of length 2. Because such a polygon
is not regular, our claim is proved.
(see …gure below). On the other hand, the angle between Ai Ai+1 and A1 B is
equal to the angle between A2k+2 i A2k+3 i and A1 B; thus xi x2k+2 i ; for
all 1 i k: It follows that the above equality can be reached only if the sides
of the polygon are equal.
If n is even, there is a similar argument, but instead of the angle bisector of
\A2k+1 A1 A2 ; one considers the perpendicular on the sides A1 A2 and Ak+1 Ak+2
(it is easy to see that these two sides are in this case parallel).
P (X) = a1 + a2 X + : : : + an X n 1
:
Proof. We have
n 1
a1 + a2 + : : : + an = 0:
If we multiply this equality with 1; we obtain
2 n 1 n
a1 + (a1 a2 ) + (a2 a3 ) + : : : + (an 1 an ) + an = 0;
or, equivalently,
2 n 1 n
a1 = (a1 a2 ) + (a2 a3 ) + : : : + (an 1 an ) + an :
j j(a1 a2 ) + j j2 (a2 a3 ) + : : : + j jn 1
(an 1 an ) + an j jn
(a1 a2 ) + (a2 a3 ) + : : : + (an 1 an ) + an = a1 :
Consequently, all inequalities must be equalities. Because 2
= R; this is possible
only if a1 = a2 = : : : = an :
+ :::
+ ((p 1) q + 1) "(p 1)q
+ : : : + pq"(p 1)q+(q 1)p
:
If we denote
= 1 + 2"p + 3"2p + : : : + q"(q 1)p
;
p 2p (q 1)p
=1+" +" + ::: + " ;
we have
f (") = + q"q + "q + 2q"2q + "2q + : : : + (p 1) q (p 1)q
+ "(p 1)q
:
Clearly, = 0; therefore
as desired.
References
[1] Mathematical Olympiad Treasures, Titu Andreescu, Bogdan Enescu,
Birkhäuser, Boston, Basel Berlin, 2004
[2] Poligoane echiangulare, Titu Andreescu, Bogdan Enescu, Gazeta Mate-
matic¼a, 107, 2002, 11, pp.422-427 (Romanian)