Grade 11 School PASCUAL M.
OSUYOS MEMORILA HIGH SCHOOL Grade Level 11
Detailed Lesson Plan Teacher KAISER LOU A. SERMENO Learning Area PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1
Teaching Date Quarter 3RD
DLP No. Duration
The learner demonstrates understanding of:
Content Standard 1. The criteria in selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature
2. Ethical standards in writing related literature.
The learner is able to:
Performance Standard 1. select, cite, and synthesize properly related literature use sources according to ethical standards
3. present written review of related literature
Code:
The learner: CS_RS11-IIIf-j-1
1. selects relevant literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-2
2. cites related literature using standard style (APA, MLA or Chicago Manual of Style) CS_RS11-IIIf-j-3
Learning Competency/ies 3. synthesizes information from relevant literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-4
4. writes coherent review of literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-5
5. follows ethical standards in writing related literature CS_RS11-IIIf-j-6
6. presents written review of literature
Key Concepts/Understanding to be
Developed
Learning Materials
1. Objectives Contextualization
to be Developed
Explain the meaning of review of related literature.
Knowledge
Carry out a review or related literature properly
Skills
Attitude
Values
2. Content Area Learning from Others and Reviewing the Literature
3. Learning Resources Practical Research I Esther L. Braceros pp
4. Procedures
4.1. Introduction to Activity Give the meaning of the underlined word in each sentence. Be guided by the contextual clues.
1. Your facial expressions and gestures could easily covey you reactions to his statement_______________.
2. Poems use poetic language; newspaper, prosaic language for an easy understanding of the news items by all
kinds of reader, highly learned or no ______.
3. I don’t need a catalogue of ideas on a piece of paper. What I need is an application of ideas _________.
4. Myriad of people from all over the world witnessed the historical demolition of the Berlin Wall _________________.
5. Through your facial expression, I will try to infer, rather than directly state the meaning of your sentence
__________________.
6. I would rather opt to stay here than go home at this of the night.
7. Your performance of higher-order thinking strategies will ensure your victory in the academic
contest.____________
8. All those Grade 6 belong to a peer group that exclude those not within their age bracket.
9. Love reading books to widen your world perception._______
10. Embodied in the introduction are the major parts of your paper.
4.2. Activity/Strategy Picture Analysis
4.3. Analysis What comes to your mind upon seeing it? Explain.
4.4. Abstraction Review of Related Literature
◦ Meaning of Review of Related Literature
◦ Literature is an oral or written record of mans significant experiences that are artistically conveyed in a prosaic
manner. Embodied in nay literary work like an essay, novel, journal, story, biography are mans best thoughts
and feelings about the world. These recorded or preserved world perceptions of man are expressed directly and
indirectly. Direct expressions of mans knowledgd of the worlsd are in books, periodicals and online reading
materials. Indirect expressions are his inferences or reflections of his surrounding that are not written or
spoken at all. ( Ridley 2012)
Purpose of Review of Related Literature RRL
1. To obtain background knowledge of your research.
2. To relate your study to the current condition or situation of the world.
3. To show the capacity of your research work to introduce new knowledge.
4. To expand, prove, or disprove the findings of previous research studies.
5. To increase your understanding of the underlying theories, principles or concepts of your research.
6. To explain technical terms in involved in you research study.
7. To highlight the significance of your work with the kind of evidence it gathered to support the conclusion of you
research.
8. To avoid repeating previous research studies.
9. To recommend the necessity of further research on a certain topic.
Styles or Approaches of RRL or Review of Related Literature.
1. Traditional Review of Literature.
To do a review of literature in a traditional way is to summarize present forms of knowledge on a specific
subject. Your aim here is to give an expanded or new understanding of an existing work.
1. Conceptual Review
2. Critical Review
3. State of the art Review
4. Expert Review
5. Scoping Review
Systematic Review of Literature
Which means methodical, is a style of RRL that involves sequential acts of a review of related literature.
A systematic review of literature is a rigorous way of obtaining data from written works. It is bias free style that every
researcher wanting to be research expert should experience.
STANDARDS TRADITIONAL REVIEW SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Purpose To have a thorough and To meet a certain
clear understanding of objective based on
the field specific based on
specific research
questions
Scope Comprehensive, wide Restricted focus
picture
Review Design Indefinite plan, permits Viewable process and
creative and exploratory proper trail
plan
Choice of studies Purposeful selection by Prepared standards for
the reviewer studies selection
Nature of Studies Traditional Review Systematic Review
Nature of Studies Inquiry-based Wide and thorough
Techniques search for all studies
Involving several studies
Quality Appraisal Reviewers view Assessment Checklist
Summary Narrative Graphical and short
Summary answers
Structure of the RRL
◦ The structure of the whole literature review indicates the organizational pattern or order of the components of
the summary of the RRL results. For the traditional review, the structure of the summary resembles that of an
essay where series of united sentences present the RRL results. However, this structure of traditional review
varies based on your subject and area of specialization. For the systematic review the structure is based on the
research question that if your RRl does not adhere to a certain method to make you begin your RRL with
research questions, your RRL is headed toward a traditional literature review structure.
4.5. Application Explain each expressions the way you understood them in relation to research.
1. Related Literature
2. Review of Related Literature
3. Traditional Review of Literature
4. Systematic review of related literature
5. Structure of literature review results
1.1. Observation
Assessment Method
a. Observation
b. Talking to Learning/ Conferencing
c. Analysis of Learners’ Products
d. Tests Multiple Choice. Write your answer on a ¼ sheet of paper
1. An informal or indirect expressions of knowledge
happen through:
a) Books
b) Gestures
c) Words
d) Sentences
2. Wide and thorough search for all studies
a) Systematic Review
b) Traditional Review
3. Summary is written in narrative form
a) Systematic Review
b) Traditional Review
4. Its purpose is to meet a certain objective based on
specific research question
a) Systematic Review
b) Traditional Review
5. The nature of study is Inquiry-based Techniques and
Involving several studies
a) Inquiry-based Techniques
b. Involving several studies
1.2. Assignment
Reinforcing/ Strengthening the day’s
lesson
Enriching/inspiring the day’s lesson
Enhancing/improving the day’s lesson
Preparing the new lesson plan
1.3. Concluding Activity
2. Remarks
3. Reflections
a. No. of learners who earned 80% in
the evaluation
b. No. of learners who require
additional activities for remediation
c. Did the remedial lessons work? No.
of learners who have cope - up with
the lesson
d. No. of learners who continue to
require remediation
e. Which of my learning strategy
worked well? Why did these work?
f. What difficulties did I encounter
which my Principal or Supervisor
can help me solve?
g. What innovation or localized
materials did I use/discover which I
wish to share with other teachers?
CHECKED BY:
AGUSTIN P. ALMERIA
Head Teacher I
