Design and Analysis of Power Generating Tiles
Design and Analysis of Power Generating Tiles
________________________________________________________________________________________________
The projections on the tile surface come in contact with P- Power. We know that for Wt=50kg, we get the value of
the piezo material (yellow) and hence apply force on it. voltage V=4v and I =0.015A, Then
P=V*I=4*0.015=0.06w, means we can say that for 50kg
The applied force produces stresses inside piezo we get power (P) =0.06w
material which will produce current.
From this we can find the value of Қ
There is clearance of 0.5cm in between the springs
Table I. Relation between P & Wt
(golden) and tile surface (blue) in order to provide free
deflection. Sr No P ( watt) Wt ( kg)
1 0.012 10
The spring (golden) is provided for stability as well as
protecting the piezo material (yellow) from getting 2 0.024 20
damage by excess load applied. 3 0.06 50
4 0.09 75
The base plate indicated in green color is fitted inside the
frame (grey) firmly to provide support to piezo material
while compression. Figure 8. shows the structure of Қ=P/Wt=0.06/50=0.0012 .Table No.1 given above shows
power generating tile. Table No.III gives Specification the relation between P & Wt. Fig 9. Shows the
of batteries arrangement of piezo electric cells. Fig.10. shows the
working prototype of power generating tile.
A. Varying Clearance VS Output Voltage:
The clearance verses o/p voltage graphs provide us with
the result that, different loads required different values of
clearance to achieve maximum voltage. The value of
optimum clearance is 8.27mm. Figure 3 shows Varying
clearance VS output voltage graphs.
B. Static Load Vs Output Voltage graphs:
Static load graph for 2sec has the highest slope and the
slope gradually decreases with the increase in duration of
application of load. The value of maximum attainable
Figure 1. Power generation and storage model. static voltage is 4.1v. Figure 4 shows static load Vs
output voltage graphs.
C. Dynamic Loading:
The dynamic loading graph Fig. 5 to 7 gives the variation
of output voltage over varying time period. The
maximum attained output voltage in dynamic loading is
3.79v.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN (Print) : 2321-5747, Volume-4, Issue-1,2016
26
International Journal on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics (IJMER)
________________________________________________________________________________________________
4.5
4 5 Dynamic Load of 65kg
O/p Voltage(v)
3.5
O/p voltage(v)
3
25kg Load
2.5
2 35kg Load
0
1.5
45kg Load 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
1
Time(sec)…
0.5
0 Figure 7. Output Voltage for the Dynamic load of 65Kg
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415 VI. VALIDATION AND TESTING
Clearance(mm)
Figure 3. Varying Clearance VS Output Voltage graphs When the foot is placed on the tile the kinetic energy of
the footstep is transferred to the piezo material. It then
produces low voltage D.C. current which can directly be
5 measured by multimeter. The D.C. current is then stored
in a battery. As D.C. voltage cannot be used for powering
4 an A.C. bulb, we create an inverter circuit to convert D.C.
For 2sec
O/p voltage(v)
3
More research is underway to increase the efficiency,
2 optimality and durability of the device under varying
conditions and for the suitability of the technology for the
1 mass deployment and commercialization of the
0 equipments.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
Time(sec)
at Optimum Clearance
Figure 6. Output Voltage for the Dynamic load of 60Kg.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN (Print) : 2321-5747, Volume-4, Issue-1,2016
27
International Journal on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics (IJMER)
________________________________________________________________________________________________
REFERENCES
[1] K. F. Graff, “A history of ultrasonic,” in Phys.
Acoust.. New York: Academic, vol. 15, ch. 1.
1981.
[2] J. Kymissis, C. Kendall, J. J. Paradiso, and N.
Gershenfeld, “Parasitic power harvesting in
shoes,” in Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Conf.Wearable
Computing, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 132–139.
Aug. 1998.
[3] N. S. Shenck and J. A. Paradiso, “Energy
scavenging with shoe-mounted piezo electrics,”
IEEE Micro, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 30–42, May-Jun. Figure 9. Arrangement of piezo electric cells on the
2001. working model
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN (Print) : 2321-5747, Volume-4, Issue-1,2016
28