Statistik
Statistik
A recent survey compared the costs of adoption through public and private
agencies. For a sample of 16 adoptions through a public agency, the mean
cost was $21,045, with a standard deviation of $835. For a sample of 18
adoptions through a private agency, the mean cost was $22,840, with a
standard deviation of $1,545. Can we conclude the mean cost is larger for
adopting children through a private agency? Use the .05 significance level.
Jawab:
H0 : µ1 ≤ µ2
H1 : µ1 > µ2
(Kata kunci: Biaya rata-rata privat agency lebih besar daripada
public agency)
𝑠12 𝑠22 2
( + )
𝑛1 𝑛2
Df =
𝑠12 2 𝑠22 2
( ) ( )
𝑛1 + 𝑛2
𝑛1−1 𝑛2−1
8352 1.5452 2
( + )
16 18
=
8352 1.5452
( 16 )2 ( 18 )2
+
16−1 18−1
1
Universitas Indonesia
697.225 2.387025 2
( + )
16 18
= 697.225 2.387025 2
( 16 )2 ( 18 )
+
15 17
(43.576,5625+132.612,5)2
= 1.898.916.799 17.586.075.156
+
15 17
31.042.585.745
=
1.161.069.462
df = 26,736 ≈ 27
Critical t value = 1,706
Ho ditolak jika t27 > 1,706
𝑥𝑏𝑎𝑟 1−𝑥𝑏𝑎𝑟 2
t =
2 2
√𝑠1 +𝑠2
𝑛1 𝑛2
22.840−21.840
=
2 2
√835 +1.545
16 18
1.795
=
√697.225+2.387025
16 18
= 4,27637
Keputusan =
Ho ditolak. Hal ini disebabkan t value sebesar 4,27637 > tdf = 1,706.
Berada di wilayah Ho ditolak
Kesimpulan =
Rata-rata biaya privat agency lebih besar daripada rata-rata biaya
public agency.
2
Universitas Indonesia
2. No. 19, hal. 370-371 – The management of Discount Furniture
The management of Discount Furniture, a chain of discount furniture stores in
the Northeast, designed an incentive plan for salespeople. To evaluate this
innovative plan, 12 sales people were selected at random, and their weekly
incomes before and after the plan were recorded.
Jawab:
Step 1: State the null hypothesis and the alternate hypothesis.
H0 : µd ≤ 0
H1 : µd > 0
(Kata kunci: increase)
3
Universitas Indonesia
Step 4: Formulate the decision rule.
Ho ditolak jika tdf > 1,796
Salesperson After ($) Before ($) Difference (d) (d-d bar) (d-d bar)^2
Sid Mahone 340 320 20 -5,9167 35,0069
Carol Quick 285 290 -5 -30,9167 955,8403
Tom Jackson 475 421 54 28,0833 788,6736
Andy Jones 510 510 0 -25,9167 671,6736
Jean Sloan 210 210 0 -25,9167 671,6736
Jack Walker 500 402 98 72,0833 5.196,0069
Peg Mancuso 631 625 6 -19,9167 396,6736
Anita Loma 560 560 0 -25,9167 671,6736
John Cuso 365 360 5 -20,9167 437,5069
Carl Utz 431 431 0 -25,9167 671,6736
A. S. Kushner 525 506 19 -6,9167 47,8403
Fern Lawton 619 505 114 88,0833 7.758,6736
Total 311 0,0000 18.302,9167
∑𝑑
D bar =
𝑛
311
=
12
= 25,91667
∑(𝑑−𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑟)^2
Sd =√ 𝑛−1
18.302,9167
=√ 11
= 40,7909489
𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑟
T = 𝑠𝑑
√𝑛
25,91667
= 40,7909489
√12
= 2,2009286
Keputusan =
Ho ditolak. Hal ini disebabkan t12 = 2,2009286 > t df = 1,796.
Berada di wilayah Ho ditolak.
4
Universitas Indonesia
Kesimpulan =
Inovative plan mengalami peningkatan untuk pendapatan harian.
Jawab:
Step 1: State the null hypothesis and the alternate hypothesis.
S = Southwyek Area
F = Franklin Park
O = Old Orchard
H0 : µS = µF = µO
H1 : Semua nilai rata-rata income tidak sama.
5
Universitas Indonesia
Step 3: Select the test statistic.
Menggunakan statistik uji tabel distribusi f.
6
Universitas Indonesia
Southwyck Area Franklin Park Old Orchard
($000) ($000) ($000)
64 74 75
68 71 80
70 69 76
60 70 78
Total per Coloum 262 284 309
Coloum Mean 65,5 71 77,25
Total 855
Grand Mean 71,25
(x - Grand Mean)^2 52,5625 7,5625 14,0625
10,5625 0,0625 76,5625
1,5625 5,0625 22,5625
126,5625 1,5625 45,5625
SS Total 364,25
7
Universitas Indonesia
Selanjutnya menghitung SST dengan rumus sebagai berikut:
= 14,17948718
8
Universitas Indonesia
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Column 1 4 262 65,5 19,6667
Column 2 4 284 71 4,66667
Column 3 4 309 77,25 4,91667
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 276,5 2 138,25 14,1795 0,00165 4,25649
Within Groups 87,75 9 9,75
Total 364,25 11
Keputusan =
Ho ditolak. Hal ini disebabkan F2,9 = 14,17948718 > F0,05;2;9 =
4,26. Berada di daerah Ho ditolak.
Kesimpulan =
Semua nilai rata-rata income tidak sama.
9
Universitas Indonesia
Jawab:
Step 1: State the null hypothesis and the alternate hypothesis.
Waktu Shift:
1 = Day
2 = Afternoon
3 = Night
Employee:
S = Skaff
L = Lum
C = Clark
T = Treece
M = Morgan
Hipotesis 1 (treatment):
H0 : µ1 = µ2 = µ3
H1 : Semua nilai rata-rata produksi berdasarkan waktu shift
(treatment) tidak sama.
Hipotesis 2 (block):
H0 : µS = µL = µC = µT
H1 : Semua nilai rata-rata produksi berdasarkan employee (block)
tidak sama.
10
Universitas Indonesia
df2 = (k-1)(b-1) = (3-1)(5-1) = 8
df2;8 = 4,46
Ho ditolak jika f > 4,46
Rule 2 (block):
b=5
df1 = (b-1) = 5-1 = 4
df2 = (k-1)(b-1) = (3-1)(5-1) = 8
df4;8 = 3,84
Ho ditolak jika f > 3,84
11
Universitas Indonesia
Units Produced Total per Block
Employee Day Afternoon Night Blok Mean
Skaff 31 25 35 91 30,3333333
Lum 33 26 33 92 30,6666667
Clark 28 24 30 82 27,3333333
Treece 30 29 28 87 29
Morgan 28 26 27 81 27
Total per Coloum 150 130 153
Coloum Mean 30 26 30,6
Total 433
Grand Mean 28,8666667
(x - Grand Mean)^2 4,55111111 14,9511111 37,6177778
17,0844444 8,21777778 17,0844444
0,75111111 23,6844444 1,28444444
1,28444444 0,01777778 0,75111111
0,75111111 8,21777778 3,48444444
SS Total 139,733333
12
Universitas Indonesia
Selanjutnya menghitung SST dengan rumus berikut:
13
Universitas Indonesia
Units Produced Total per Block
Employee Day Afternoon Night Blok Mean
Skaff 31 25 35 91 30,3333333
Lum 33 26 33 92 30,6666667
Clark 28 24 30 82 27,3333333
Treece 30 29 28 87 29
Morgan 28 26 27 81 27
Total per Coloum 150 130 153
Coloum Mean 30 26 30,6
Total 433
Grand Mean 28,8666667
(x - Grand Mean)^2 4,55111111 14,9511111 37,6177778
17,0844444 8,21777778 17,0844444
0,75111111 23,6844444 1,28444444
1,28444444 0,01777778 0,75111111
0,75111111 8,21777778 3,48444444
SS Total 139,733333
k(X block mean- Skaff 6,45333333
Grand mean)^2 Lum 9,72
Clark 7,05333333
Treece 0,05333333
Morgan 10,4533333
SSB 33,7333333
(x - Coloum Mean)^2 Day 6,42222222
Afternoon 41,0888889
Night 15,0222222
SST 62,5333333
SSE 43,4666667
𝑆𝑆𝐵/(𝑏−1)
F2 =
𝑆𝑆𝐸/(𝑘−1)(𝑏−1)
33,7333/(5−1)
=
43,46667/(3−1)(5−1)
14
Universitas Indonesia
8,43333
=
5,43333
= 1,5521472
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Columns (Shit/Treatment) 62,5333 2 31,26667 5,7546 0,02827 4,45897
Rows (Employee/Block) 33,7333 4 8,433333 1,55215 0,27615 3,83785
Error 43,4667 8 5,433333
Total 139,733 14
Keputusan
- Untuk waktu shift (treatment/column), Ho ditolak.
Hal ini disebabkan F = 5,7546 > Fdf = 4,4589. Berada di daerah
Ho ditolak.
15
Universitas Indonesia
- Untuk employee (block/rows), Ho tidak ditolak
Hal ini disebabkan F = 1,55215 < Fdf = 3,83785. Berada di
daerah Ho tidak ditolak.
Kesimpulan
Terdapat perbedaan nilai rata-rata produksi berdasarkan waktu shift,
namun tidak terjadi perbedaan nilai rata-rata produksi berdasarkan
pekerja (employee).
16
Universitas Indonesia