Scribd
Upload
98 views

GNSS Signal Structures

GNSS Signal Structures

Uploaded by

Vasikaran Prabaharan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
98 views

GNSS Signal Structures

GNSS Signal Structures

Uploaded by

Vasikaran Prabaharan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 45

GNSS Signal Structures

Tom Stansell
Stansell Consulting
[email protected]
Bangkok, Thailand
23 January 2018

S t a n s e ll
C o n s u lt in g
RL
Introduction

It’s a pleasure to speak with you


this morning. What follows are
excerpts from three separate
presentations.

Regards,

Tom Stansell

S t a n s e ll
C o n s u lt in g
RL

Slide 2
Source Presentations

S t a n s e ll
C o n s u lt in g
RL

Slide 3
GNSS Modernization
and Interoperability

Tom Stansell
Stansell Consulting
[email protected]

Slide 1
The Goal of Interoperability
 Ideal interoperability
allows navigation
with one signal
each from four or
more systems with
no additional
receiver cost or
complexity

Interoperable = Better Together than Separate


Slide 2
Main Benefits of Interoperability
More Satellites  Better Geometry  Improves:
 Satellite coverage
 Navigate where could not before
 Dilution of Precision
 Accuracy is better everywhere
 Eliminates DOP holes (with open sky)

 RAIM*
 Integrity checked everywhere, all the time
 Eliminates RAIM holes (with open sky)

 Phase ambiguity resolution


 For survey and machine control applications
 Accuracy
 Allows higher elevation angle cutoff which reduces multipath, ionospheric,
and tropospheric errors

* Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring


Slide 3
Spectrum of GNSS Signals

NAVIC

Slide 4
Slide 5
2018

Originally presented December 2008; Updated to current status and plans


GPS Signals Summary

Center
Band Frequency Signal Waveform Notes
C/A BPSK(1) Open Service
P(Y) BPSK(10)
L1 1575.42 MHz
L1C TMBOC Open Service, Separate Pilot and Data Channels
M BOC(10,5)
P(Y) BPSK(10)
L2 1227.6 MHz L2C BPSK(1) Open Service, Separate Pilot and Data Channels
M BOC(10,5)
L5 1176.45 MHz L5 BPSK(10) Open Service, Separate Pilot and Data Channels

Slide 7
Slide 8
Galileo Signals Summary

Center
Band Frequency Signals Waveform Notes
E1 OS CBOC Open Service, Separate Pilot and Data Channels
E1 1575.42 MHz
PRS BOC(15,2.5)
CS BPSK(5) Commercial Service, Separate Pilot and Data Channels
E6 1278.75 MHz
PRS BOC(10,5)
E5 1191.795 MHz E5a & E5b AltBOC(15,10) Open Service, Separate Pilot and Data Channels

Slide 10
Slide 11
Note: Some signal changes
are being evaluated
Signal Plans

Slide 13
Future GLONASS Signal Spectrum

Slide 15
Signal Plans
(From Several Presentations)

Slide 16
“QBOC”
GNSS Signals, Spectra,
and Receiver Fundamentals

1
2
3
Simple Pseudorandom Code Generator

Code length =
=
= 15

C/A Code length =


=
= 1023

4
Code Modulation Spreads the Spectrum

5
Frequency Domain
6
GNSS Spectra
E5b/B2b B3 E6

NAVIC Note: NAVIC

L1, L2, & L5 are paramount, but also GLONASS, PRS, E5b, B3, & E6

7
Power Spectral Density (dBW/MHz)
GNSS L1 Spectrum

Frequency (MHz)
8
Receiver Signal Processing

9
10
27 Years with Just 3 GPS Signals

Direct civil access to C/A code

Indirect civil access by codeless


and semi-codeless means

1978 to
2005

11
IIR-M Satellites Added Three More

Direct civil access


to L2C code

1978 to 2005
2005

12
IIF Satellites Added L5

Safety
service
in
ARNS
band

1978 to 2005 2010


2005

13
GPS III Will Add L1C

Better performance

1978 to 2005 2010 2018?


2005

14
Modernized Signal Structures
• The most important improvements in GNSS
signal structures since1978 have been adopted
for essentially every new and modernized signal
– Including GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS
– Hopefully also for NAVIC and GLONASS CDMA
• The improvements are (a) to have a data-less
pilot carrier and (b) to use Forward Error Control
(FEC) to enhance data reception
• There are many other variations, e.g.,
– Binary Offset Carrier (BOC) combinations, spreading
code structures, FEC techniques, power split between
data and pilot channels, symbol interleaving, etc.
– Each has a purpose, e.g., spectrum separation

15
Signal Structure, Interoperability, and Geometry

Tom Stansell
Consultant to the Aerospace Corporation
[email protected]

23 January 2018
ICG Workshop, Bangkok, Thailand

© The Aerospace Corporation 2015


Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed


herein are those of the author and
do not necessarily reflect the official
policy or position of The Aerospace
Corporation or of any agency of the
U.S. government.
Portions of this work have been sponsored
by The Aerospace Corporation

2 © The Aerospace Corporation 2015


The Most Important Ingredient
• Only Navigation by Satellite can provide excellent Geometry
– Continuous, worldwide, four dimensional, with excellent accuracy
– GDOP, Geometric Dilution of Precision, and its important children:
• PDOP, HDOP, VDOP, and TDOP
– Although the satellite signals may be weak, the geometry is strong
• No terrestrial navigation aid delivers “the most important ingredient”
• Do users need better geometry than GPS alone can provide?
• The answer is a definite “YES” as demonstrated by:
– Widespread use of GLONASS in products from consumer mobile
phones to commercial survey and machine control products
• In spite of the difficulty of using GLONASS FDMA with GPS CDMA
– Plus widespread development of receivers to use all available GNSS
• Aircraft at altitude and ships at sea may not need more than GPS
– But integrity by A-RAIM requires many more satellites
• Users subject to signal blockage or outage do need more satellites
• Thus, the second most important ingredient is signal interoperability
– Enabling the best geometry by using every interoperable satellite signal
3 © The Aerospace Corporation 2015
Signal Structure and Interoperability Considerations
• Interoperability is in the eye of the beholder
• For example, L1C and E1 OS have identical center frequencies and
identical spectra, but almost everything else is different
Spreading Pilot
Code Spreading Channel Data Pilot Forward Overlay Message
Length Code with Power Power Symbol Error Code Frame
Signal (chips) Duration Modulation BOC(6,1) Percent Percent Rate Bit Rate Correction Duration Length
L1C 10,230 10 ms TMBOC Pilot 25% 75% 100 SPS 50 BPS LDPC 18 sec 18 sec
E1 OS 4,092 4 ms CBOC Both 50% 50% 250 SPS 125 BPS Convolutional 100 ms 720 sec
• Receivers will handle the differences and hide them from the user
– The user will experience better performance due to more satellites
• However, different types of receivers will take advantage of some of
the signal differences between systems
– Identical center frequency is important for high precision receivers and
for bandwidth limited GNSS antennas on aircraft
– Many receivers will use GPS L1 C/A for fast signal acquisition but the
other signal structures for navigation, positioning, and timing

4 © The Aerospace Corporation 2015


Predicting the Future
• If there are three global interoperable GNSS constellations in 2020
– GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou, with a total of 72 to 90 operational satellites
1. Use of GLONASS FDMA will decrease for precision applications
– The current demand for more satellites will be satisfied by interoperable
CDMA signals, leaving little demand for the more difficult FDMA signals
2. Users will not say “this is my GNSS” or “this is my BeiDou”
– There will be few if any GPS-only or BeiDou-only or Galileo-only receivers
– Users won’t know and they won’t care where the signals originate
– They will just enjoy the better performance provided by better geometry
– And they probably will continue to call their device a “GPS” (sorry!)
3. Special, unique, or “orphan” signals will be little used
– Use of GPS L2C will decline because no other GNSS provides it
– The standard dual-frequency pair will become 1575.42 and 1176.45 MHz
– E5b and B2b will be little used, whereas E5a and B2a will be widely used
• A lively discussion topic!

5 © The Aerospace Corporation 2015


Future Decrease in High Precision FDMA Use
• A pure “time delay” Δt is characterized by a linear slope of phase
versus frequency
 / f   / ( / t )  t
• However, a bandpass filter must

Phase
rapidly attenuate signals outside
the bandpass region
• This introduces nonlinearities in
phase versus frequency, especially Frequency

at the band edges


• In high precision applications it is desirable for every signal from
every satellite to experience the same nonlinearities so there are no
time delay differences between signals due to receiver filtering
• This will be true if every signal has the same center frequency
• Because this is not true for GLONASS FDMA signals, very careful
calibration of each channel is required for near-precision results
• This is why high precision use of GLONASS FDMA will likely
decrease substantially with deployment of Galileo and BeiDou
6 © The Aerospace Corporation 2015
Growth Continues and Should Accelerate
• Application growth is fueled primarily by the private sector
– Heavily regulated products, e.g., for aviation and the military, are slow to
change and generally lag in innovation (sad but true)
• Factors that encourage innovation and application growth:
– Competition, Moore’s law, opportunity, fear, and the profit motive
• What in the future will stimulate growth:
– Much better GNSS geometry improves availability, continuity, integrity,
and accuracy, especially in difficult environments
• Urban canyons, real canyons, open pit mining, even aviation
– A-RAIM will become practical and begin to displace SBAS use
– Ambiguity resolution for Real Time Kinematic (RTK) in survey and
machine control will become almost instantaneous and more reliable
• Improved vertical accuracy will displace some laser plane requirements
• Alternate means to communicate message parameters will promote
“instant navigation” for all applications (push to navigate)

7 © The Aerospace Corporation 2015

You might also like