See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/287208513

Physics Education COMPOUND PENDULUM

Article · July 2012

CITATIONS READS
0 23,053

4 authors, including:

Shirish Pathare Rohan Lahane

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research NP
19 PUBLICATIONS   33 CITATIONS    9 PUBLICATIONS   4 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Experimental Development View project

Low-cost Instrumentation View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Rohan Lahane on 18 December 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012

COMPOUND PENDULUM

S. R. PATHARE, R. D. LAHANE, S. S. SAWANT*, C. C. PATIL

Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education (TIFR)
V. N. Purav Marg, Mankhurd. Mumbai 400 088.
[email protected]
*
Bhavan’s College, Munshi Nagar, Andheri (W), Mumbai – 400 058.
(Submitted 08-08-2012)

Abstract
This is an edited version of the experiment set for the experimental examination conducted
at the orientation cum selection camp held at Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education
(TIFR), Mumbai in May 2010. Generally, the compound pendulum studied in undergraduate
laboratory is in the form of a uniform bar whose axis of oscillation is varied. In this
experiment, a compound pendulum with a fixed axis of oscillation but with a movable mass
is used to study the dependence of periodic time on the position of the movable mass and to
determine the gravitational field strength.

1. Introduction 2. APPARATUS
The compound pendulum provided for this
experiment consists of a rod with a fixed knife- 1) A compound pendulum consisting of a rod with
edge, which acts as the axis of oscillation of the one mass attached at one of its ends, another mass
oscillating pendulum somewhere along its capable of sliding along the rod and a knife edge to
length. A cylindrical body of mass m1 is used be fixed on the rod,
which can be moved along the length of the rod. 2) An Allen key,
Another cylindrical body of mass m2 is fixed at 3) A plastic washer for supporting movable mass,
the lower end of the rod. A plastic washer is used 4) An acrylic support with fixed glass slides on
to support the mass m1 at various positions on which the knife edge is to rest,
the rod. 5) A G-clamp for clamping the acrylic support to the
edge of the table,
When the pendulum is suspended with its knife- 6) A stopwatch,
edge on a rigid platform and set into oscillation, 7) A measuring tape,
its periodic time of oscillation changes 8) Vernier calipers and
depending on the position of the movable mass. 9) A micrometer screw gauge.
The experiment consists of studying the
relationship of the distance of the movable mass
from the axis of oscillation with the periodic
time of the pendulum.

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012

Figure 1.The compound pendulum

3. Description of apparatus:

Figure 3. Knife Edge with Allen key

Figure 2. A rod with a mass m2 fixed at one end.

Figure 4. Acrylic support with glass slides fixed on it and

the G-clamp

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012

Figure 5. Stopwatch, measuring tape and vernier calipers and micrometer screw gauge

Figure 6. The complete setup

4. Theory 5. Experiment
For small oscillations, the periodic time T of
compound pendulum, with mass M and moment of Given data:
inertia I about the axis of oscillation, is given to a Masses of
good approximation by i) Rod: mr = 161 ± 1 g
I ii) Knife-edge: mke = 12 ± 1 g
T  , iii) Bodies: m1 = m2 = 99.5 ± 0.5 g
Mgl
where, l is the distance between the axis of 1. Express the distance l and the moment of
oscillation and the centre of mass of the inertia I about the axis of oscillation in terms
pendulum. of the distance x of the movable mass m1 and
other constants of the system.

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012

Use the following symbols in your using the Allen key and after shifting the mass
derivations. below its position fix it again.] Tabulate your
Length of the rod: L. results.
Distance between the knife-edge and the end
of the rod with fixed cylindrical body: x0 5. Sketch graphs (rough sketches on the plain
Inner and outer radii of the cylindrical bodies: answer sheet) to show how I and l vary as the
R1 and R2. mass m1 is shifted from one end to the other.
Length of the cylindrical bodies with masses Plot T versus x and explain the significance of
m1 and m2: h. the minimum T in this graph.
Mass of the rod: mr
Mass of the assembly of knife edge: mke.
6. Reorganize the terms in the equation of T as a
2. Hence express the periodic time T of the function of x and plot a linear graph from
pendulum as a function of x. If you have made which g can be obtained. Determine the slope
any assumptions in neglecting any terms in the of the graph, calculate g and estimate the
above derivations mention them with uncertainty in the obtained value.
supporting arguments.

7. Obtain from the graph the value of T at x = 0.

3. Make the necessary measurements of physical Determine the value of g using the formula for
dimensions of the system forming the T with x = 0.
compound pendulum. You may use scales,
vernier calipers and micrometer screw as
required. Tabulate the measured values along 8. If the movable mass is kept at the top end of
with the uncertainties in measurements. the pendulum and you are allowed to move
the axis of suspension, will it be possible to
4. Suspend the pendulum from the rigid support
make T infinite? Explain the conditions under
and determine its periodic time for different
positions of the movable mass by moving it which this is possible. Will it be possible to
from the top of the rod to the fixed mass at the achieve the condition experimentally?
bottom in suitable steps. [For moving the mass Substantiate your answer with reasons, if
below the knife edge remove the knife edge necessary.

6. TYPICAL OBSERVATIONS AND CALCULATIONS

1)
Equation for I:
2
m  L m h2 m
  m h2 m

I  r L2  m r  x 0    1  1 R12  R22  m1 x 2  2  2 R12  R22 
12  2 12 4 12 4
2
 h (1)
 m 2  x 0    I ke
 2

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012
Equation for l:
 L  h
Ml  mr  x0    m2  x0    m1 x  mke  xke
 2  2
1   L  h 
l   mr  x0  2   m2  x0  2   m1 x  mke  xke  (2)
M      

Here, M  mr  m1  m2  mke
We can neglect the terms Ike in equation (1) and mke xke in equation (2) because they would be very small.

2.
I
T  2
Mgl
I
T 2l  4 2
Mg
Reorganizing the terms in equation (1) we can write
  L2  L   ( m1  m 2 ) h 2 ( m1  m 2 ) 2
2
 h 
2

I  m1 x   m r    x 0    
2
 R1  R2   m 2  x0   
2

  12  2   12 4  2  
The terms in the bracket are constant. Representing the constant by A,
I  m1 x 2  A
We can reorganize the terms in equation (2) as
m1 1   L  h 
l x  m r  x0    m 2  x0   
M M   2  2 
Again, representing the terms in bracket by a constant B,
m1
l xB
M

 m  4 2
T 2  B  1 x   m1 x 2  A 
 M  Mg

3.
Measurements of physical dimensions of the system:

Quantity Value Uncertainty

L 69.0 cm 0.1 cm
h 2.500 cm 0.002 cm
x0 45.9 cm 0.1 cm
R1 1.265 cm 0.001 cm
R2 0.300 cm 0.001 cm
Diameter of the rod 0.588 cm 0.002 cm

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012

4.
Obs. h Time for 20 oscillations T /s
(x ± ∆x)/cm x /cm
No. 2 t1 /s t2 /s t3 /s Mean t /s
1 -21.75 ± 0.10 -23.0 36.44 36.56 36.40 36.467 1.823 ± 0.008
2 -20.55 ± 0.10 -21.8 35.50 35.56 35.38 35.480 1.774 ± 0.009
3 -18.85 ± 0.10 -20.1 34.22 34.22 34.28 34.240 1.712 ± 0.003
4 -16.85 ± 0.10 -18.1 33.22 33.19 33.21 33.207 1.661 ± 0.002
5 -13.95 ± 0.10 -15.2 31.72 31.75 31.62 31.697 1.585 ± 0.006
6 -11.65 ± 0.10 -12.9 30.69 30.78 30.68 30.717 1.536 ± 0.005
7 -8.65 ± 0.10 -9.9 29.41 29.47 29.43 29.437 1.472 ± 0.003
8 -5.75 ± 0.10 -7.0 28.62 28.47 28.62 28.570 1.429 ± 0.008
9 -2.15 ± 0.10 -3.4 27.53 27.53 27.47 27.510 1.376 ± 0.003
10 3.75 ± 0.10 5.0 26.32 26.47 26.25 26.347 1.318 ± 0.011
11 5.75 ± 0.10 7.0 26.06 26.03 26.00 26.030 1.302 ± 0.003
12 9.15 ± 0.10 10.4 25.62 25.62 25.59 25.610 1.281 ± 0.002
13 12.25 ± 0.10 13.5 25.37 25.37 25.28 25.340 1.267 ± 0.004
14 15.25 ± 0.10 16.5 25.16 25.25 25.16 25.190 1.259 ± 0.004
15 17.75 ± 0.10 19.0 25.00 25.07 25.19 25.087 1.255 ± 0.010
16 21.65 ± 0.10 22.9 25.12 25.28 25.28 25.227 1.262 ± 0.008
17 24.75 ± 0.10 26.0 25.13 25.06 25.06 25.083 1.255 ± 0.004
18 28.05 ± 0.10 29.3 25.37 25.28 25.37 25.340 1.267 ± 0.004
19 31.25 ± 0.10 32.5 25.41 25.50 25.40 25.437 1.272 ± 0.005
20 34.75 ± 0.10 36.0 26.00 25.84 25.89 25.910 1.296 ± 0.008
21 39.25 ± 0.10 40.5 26.28 26.25 26.25 26.260 1.313 ± 0.002
22 41.95 ± 0.10 43.2 26.69 26.68 26.78 26.717 1.336 ± 0.005

5.
a. Plot T versus x.

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012

b. Rough Sketches:

6.
m  4
2

T 2  1 x  B   m1 x 2  A 
M  Mg
 m1 
Plot a graph of  T  x  B  versus x2.
2

M 
Here,
1   L  h  1   69   2 .5  
B  m  x    m  x    161 45 . 9    99 . 5 45 . 9  
2   372   2  
r 0 2 0
M   2  2  


1
1835 .4  4442 .7   16 .88
372
Hence, plot a graph of T 16 .88  0.267 x  versus x2.
2

T2(16.88 +0.267x)/cm s2 x2/cm2

1 36.84 473
2 35.86 422
3 34.72 355
4 34.16 284
5 33.05 195
6 32.49 136
7 31.57 75
8 31.33 33
9 30.87 5
10 31.06 14
11 31.22 33
12 31.71 84
13 32.35 150
14 33.21 233
15 34.05 315
16 36.09 469
17 36.99 613
18 39.12 787
19 40.81 977
20 43.94 1208
21 47.17 1541
22 50.12 1760

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012
Graph:

50

45

T (16.88-0.267x) /s cm
2
40

35
2

30

-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
2 2
x /cm

Slope = 0.0107
4 2 m1
Slope   0.0107
Mg
4 2  99 .5
g  985 .861 dynes/g
372  0.0107
Uncertainty in g:
2
  m1   M 
2
  2
g
  3  3    1  slope 

  
g  m1   M   3 slope 
   
2 2
 0 .5   1 .6 
     1
2
3 3 
       0 .0128   0 .00832
 99 .5   372   3 
   
The expanded uncertainty
g  0.00832  985 .861  2  16 .4  17 dynes/g
g  986  17 dynes/g

7.
From the graph of T versus x:
T (at x = 0) = 1.355 s

m  4 2

T 2 B  1 x   m1 x 2  A  
 M  Mg

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

Physics Education Jul –Sep 2012

At x = 0
4 2 A
 BT 2 
Mg
Here
 L2  L   m h2 m
2 2


h
A  mr    x0     1  1 R12  R22  m2  x0  
 12 

 2   6 2  2

 69 2  69   99 .5  2.5 2 99 .5
2 2

 161    45 .9 
 12      

1.27  0.30  99 .5   45 .9 
2 2 2 .5 

 2   6 2  2 
 84800  104  85  198365  283354 g  cm 2

and
1   L  h  1   69   2 .5  
B  mr  x0  2   m2  x0  2    372 161 45 .9  2   99 .5 45 .9  2  
M          


1
1835 .4  4442 .7   16 .88
372
4 2  283354
16 .88  1.355 2 
372 g
g  969 dynes/g or 9.69 N/kg

8. between the knife edge and centre of mass is

If l is zero, the period will be infinite. This varied in definite steps.
condition can be satisfied if the knife edge is This experiment explores another way to study the
moved and placed at the center of mass with both compound pendulum by varying the position of
masses at the two ends of the rod. Another way centre of mass by shifting mass m1 rather than the
can be to move the mass m1 such that the centre of point of suspension.
mass of the system coincides with the position of The linearization technique in this experiment (to
the knife edge. plot the suitable graph) requires a rearrangement
In either of the case, when the pendulum is of variables which itself is a skill to be developed
displaced from its equilibrium position, it will not by students.
return back to the equilibrium position as T is
infinite. But the condition of unstable equilibrium 8. Acknowledgements
will make it unrealizable experimentally.
We would like to thank Prof. D. A. Desai for his
7. Discussion valuable guidance in the development of this
experiment. We also wish to thank the students
In the undergraduate laboratories, bar pendulum is who helped us in standardizing the apparatus.
a regular experiment. In that experiment, distance
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Volume 28, Issue 3, Article Number : 5. www.physedu.in

View publication stats