CTL Reflection
CTL Reflection
The study of the unit Contemporary Teacher Leadership has enabled me to envisage the diverse
platforms educators may utilize to reach out to different contexts and be leaders within schools. It is
teachers and the learning environment of students (O’Brien, 2007). This is a vital strategy which may
trigger positive interventions for students and teachers displaying limitations within a school. The
following paper will investigate our teams’ efforts designing, implementing and evaluating a project
plan, counteracting a limitation presented at Chifley College Bidwill; which focused on increasing
school attendance by meaningful learning. Hence, it will also embody the notion how the key to
examine the strategies emphasized in the designed project, and how reflexivity of my own teaching
practice as a future educator will lay the platform for success as a pre-service teacher.
Teachers have a pivotal role in shaping positive influences within schools (Surian, 2015). Leadership
is an important element in the identity of educators contributing to student learning and growth,
and professional development within teachers themselves (Boylan, 2013). Acting as a team of
leaders through collaboration, aligns with the theory of distributed leadership in which we shared
our knowledge to achieve a goal for change (Astuti, 2018). Padilla (2009) claims that the process of
indicated within Boylan’s study, where educators can extend skills in leadership in the school setting
by collaborative teacher-led programs (Boylan, 2013). The occurrence of regular meetings and
conferences enabled me to consider the theory. Putting it into practice, regular meetings allowed
me to build stronger collaborative relations; hence, emphasizing the importance of leadership in the
1
teaching profession. An emergent theme that I gathered from this unit is the concept that teachers
may lead for change, and that as educators we play a pivotal role in advocating for change or
Whilst developing the project, our aim was to increase attendance at Chifley College Bidwill by
implementing meaningful learning and therefore increasing a sense of connection to the school. Our
group took initiative around developing their knowledge about Chifley College. Analysing
contemporary information and policies of the school alluded to our group that truancy was a major
issue that needed to be addressed. Most of the schools’ population come from English as a second
language background (EAL/D) and are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, and therefore the target of
our meaningful lessons was the construction of teaching far from traditional teacher practices,
which we believed could combat the lack of sense of connection and engagement in those students.
Clontarf is an existing program within the school which aims at increasing the attendance of
Indigenous students through recreational activities outside school and provides one-on-one
classroom support; however, it does not reach out to other student populations within the school.
This led our team to reflect on both our practicums to design a plan that would be used to assist all
students to go to school, and for that to happen it had to begin in the classroom. Contributing as a
team made me feel a sense of leadership (Astuti, 2018), where we expressed our concerns and
Designing interventions which supported student’s attendance through meaningful lessons required
our group to work collaboratively as leaders within the project. Each member of the team addressed
an aspect which allowed all the team members to combine the components together. This proved to
be an effective strategy as all members of our team were able to investigate the project through
qualities as mentioned through Covey’s imperatives of great leaders, aligning ideas and knowledge
and empowering members to achieve their best (Covey, 2012). Our efforts in collaboration with our
2
project caused an increase in trust among the members and working together effectively, as we
Our strategies were implemented according to teaching standards within the teaching profession.
We looked at standard 1, where incorporating meaningful lessons was due to knowing the students
and their learning needs, referencing the standard of knowing your students and how they learn
(AITSL, 2018); as well as implementing lessons at the start of the term by preparing lessons in
advance which enable meaningful lessons. This is achieved by allowing students to feel a sense of
student ownership of their learning, student-centred pedagogy, empowering the students and
eliminating ‘rote’ learning, incorporating Information and communication technology (ICT) in all key
learning areas and integrating graphic organisers. This alludes to standard 1.5 where differentiation
is viewed as a contributor for engaging students (AITSL, 2018). This in-turn will positively impact on
numeracy and literacy levels (Roby, 2013). Lesson plans were also organised based on student’s
prior knowledge, encapsulating the social constructivism approach, where learning connects with
the environments of the students and is understood throughout their developmental stages (Astuti,
2018).
Reflecting upon our group project, it allowed room for further improvement. There were strengths
and challenges however. A strength we identified was being able to work in collaboration as we
constructed our interventions. Evaluating the challenges, we were faced with technical issues
relating to meeting through Zoom, an online technological platform; where we were faced with
difficulties meeting as each member had their own personal commitments. We also had differences
of opinions in aspects of the project, but we were able to reduce conflicts by working collaboratively
as we were able to establish and reiterate the projects goals for each member. Our team came up
with an idea that faculties in the school need to be trained and must undergo constant training to
ensure meaningful lessons are implemented efficiently. This will in-turn improve numeracy and
literacy levels, NAPLAN results and ultimately attendance. Reflecting on the project and teacher
3
leadership, I have gathered positive perspectives to how as teachers we can become leaders and be
influential. Ultimately, all the components in this unit have allowed me to be motivated to strive
4
References
https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards
School Reviewed from Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory. SHS Web of Conferences, 42,
Covey, S. (2012) The 4 Imperatives of Great Leaders. Leaders: Great Leaders, Great Teams, Great
v.1.0.9.pdf.
O’Brien, D. (2007). Building Professional Capital through Teacher Leadership [Ebook]. Presented at
http://www.acu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/89887/Building_Professional_Capital_th
rough_Teacher_Leadership.pdf
Padilla, F. E. (2009). Collaborative education leadership in times of education renewal: What every
new teacher should know. Planning and Changing, 40(3), 207-223. Retrieved from
Roby, D. (2013). Teacher attendance effects on students achievement: Research study of Ohio
Literacy Education in Michigan Elementary Reward Schools Beating the Odds, ProQuest
Thorpe, R., Gold, J., & Lawler, J. (2011). Locating Distributed Leadership. International Journal of