While qualitative and quantitative research methods were once seen as separate, it is now common to use mixed methods. Qualitative and quantitative data can be combined at various stages, such as during data collection and analysis. Qualitative data is useful for understanding complex situations, while quantitative data can test specific hypotheses. Each type of data has strengths and can provide different insights.
Phenomenology aims to understand human experiences through qualitative research. It is based in philosophy and psychology and involves setting aside biases to study how people perceive and experience phenomena. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with small samples to identify themes in how people live through and understand certain experiences.
Replicability is important for research validity but presents some challenges for qualitative research.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views
Research Questions
While qualitative and quantitative research methods were once seen as separate, it is now common to use mixed methods. Qualitative and quantitative data can be combined at various stages, such as during data collection and analysis. Qualitative data is useful for understanding complex situations, while quantitative data can test specific hypotheses. Each type of data has strengths and can provide different insights.
Phenomenology aims to understand human experiences through qualitative research. It is based in philosophy and psychology and involves setting aside biases to study how people perceive and experience phenomena. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with small samples to identify themes in how people live through and understand certain experiences.
Replicability is important for research validity but presents some challenges for qualitative research.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
1.
If your study is basically qualitative discuss which aspects are or can be
done qualitatively or vice versa. -- While it might seem unorthodox to mix seemingly different fields, it turns out to be a common practice. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods is neither new nor controversial. It is now known as mixed-method research. You can combine qualitative and quantitative methods at various points like data collection and the analysis and interpretation of the data. Results from one method can be extended or triangulated by using another method. The prevalent use of quantitative data is to focus inquiry on a discrete set of variables to test specific hypothesis or research question. In contrast, the data prevalent use of qualitative data is to open the study through presenting the large, interconnected complexities of a situation. Thus, each type of data has advantages and can extend, in certain ways, our understanding of a researchable problem.
2. Discuss briefly the phenomenological paradigm by citing its theoretical
underpinnings. What makes an inquiry phenomenological? Phenomenology has its roots in a 20th century philosophical movement based on the work of the philosopher Edmund Husserl. As a research tool, phenomenology is based on the academic disciplines of philosophy and psychology and has become a widely accepted method for describing human experiences. Phenomenology is a qualitative research method that is used to describe how human beings experience a certain phenomenon. A phenomenological study attempts to set aside biases and preconceived assumptions about human experiences, feelings and responses to a particular situation. It allows the researcher to delve into the perceptions, perspectives, understanding, and feelings of those people who have actually experienced or lived the phenomenon or situation of interest. Therefore, phenomenology can be defined as the direct investigation and description of phenomena as consciously experienced by people living those experiences. Phenomenological research is typically conducted through the use of in-depth interviews of small samples of participants. By studying the perspectives of multiple participants, a researcher can begin to make generalizations regarding what it is like to experience a certain phenomenon from the perspective of those that have lived the experience. An inquiry is phenomenological when the data collected is qualitative and will be better understood if the analysis would include an attempt to identify themes or make generalizations regarding how a particular phenomenon is actually perceived or experienced. 3. Discuss the replicability aspects of research. Is it feasible in qualitative research? Why or why not and discuss whether it is an advantage or a limitation. Research is replicable when an independent group of researchers can copy the same process and arrive at the same results as the original study; hence, establishing its validity. For example, if someone conducts experiment A and arrives at conclusion B and you attempt to replicate this experiment but end up with conclusion C, the experiment is not replicable. The concept of replicability relates only to a single finding. If a study contains multiple findings, each finding must be assessed separately. While the failure to replicate one finding of a study will typically bode badly for the rest, it is not unusual to have only a subset of findings from a study to be replicable. Yes, replicability is feasible in a qualitative research. It is one attribute of research that should be assured by both quantitative and qualitative disciplines. However, there are certain limitations for qualitative since it is a potentially contentious issue still. For example in ethnography, replicability is not necessarily meaningful because the researcher takes on the role of the research instrument. Most qualitative researchers would not argue against the need for transparency. Therefore, we focus on transparency criteria and the extent to which transparency is necessary for three different types of replication studies: (a) exact replication – using the same population and the same procedures; (b) empirical replication – using the same procedures but a different population; (c) conceptual replication – using the same population but different procedures.