Capacity Analysis Report
Capacity Analysis Report
A5) Required Good Parts / Week APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
H Percent of parts scrapped
J Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process
[Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts /
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Avg. Weekly Max Weekly
Required Incoming Parts for - -
A6) Required OEE APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
K Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle)
L # of Tools or Machines in parallel
M # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle
N Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q Required OEE [J / P] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process)
S Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N) <= P]
T % Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
{P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P
V Supplier Name
W Supplier Location
X Site Code for Surrogate Process
Y Surrogate Customer & Program Reference (~Ford P221)
List reference Surrogate Process (~Stamping Press #12)
Z Average Surrogate OEE - - - - - - - -
Enter any other assumptions for clarification
(Part Number, Annual Volume, Operating Pattern, etc.)
C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / Week
Process Description
APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result
Predicted Good Parts / Week Req'd OEE at APW Req'd OEE at MPW Surrogate Demonstrated OEE
APW MPW
1200.0%
1000.0%
OEE %
NOTES 800.0%
600.0%
400.0%
200.0%
0.0%
Rejected
ure
© 2010 Ford Motor Company
Signature Date Image Phone Number Signature/Date Signature/Date
from
file
A5) Required Good Parts / Week APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
H Percent of parts scrapped
J Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts /
(100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Avg. Weekly Max Weekly
Required Incoming Parts for - -
A6) Required OEE APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
K Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle)
L # of Tools or Machines in parallel
M # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle
N Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q Required OEE [J / P] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process)
S Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N) <= P]
T % Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
{P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P
AJ # Parts Scrapped - - - - - - - -
AK # Parts Reworked - - - - - - - -
AL Quality Rate [(AE - AJ - AK) / AE] - - - - - - - -
B4) Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
AM Phase 0 OEE [AD * AG * AL] - - - - - - - -
B5) Process Specific Weekly Part Estimate [P * AM] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B6) Observed Average Cycle Time (sec/cycle)
C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / Week
Process Description
APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result
Predicted Good Parts / Week Req'd OEE at APW Req'd OEE at MPW Demonstrated OEE
1000.0%
OEE %
800.0%
NOTES
600.0%
400.0%
200.0%
0.0%
A5) Required Good Parts / Week APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
H Percent of parts scrapped
J Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts /
(100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Avg. Weekly Max Weekly
Required Incoming Parts for - -
A6) Required OEE APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan APW Plan MPW Plan
K Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle)
L # of Tools or Machines in parallel
M # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle
N Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q Required OEE [J / P] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process)
S Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N) <= P]
T % Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
{P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P
AJ # Parts Scrapped - - - - - - - -
AK # Parts Reworked - - - - - - - -
AL Quality Rate [(AE - AJ - AK) / AE] - - - - - - - -
B4) Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
AM Phase 3 OEE [AD * AG * AL] - - - - - - - -
B5) Process Specific Weekly Part Estimate [P * AM] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B6) Observed Average Cycle Time (sec/cycle)
C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / Week
Process Description
APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result
Predicted Good Parts / Week Req'd OEE at APW Req'd OEE at MPW Demonstrated OEE
1000.0%
OEE %
800.0%
NOTES
600.0%
400.0%
200.0%
0.0%
Rejected
SUPPLIER OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPROVAL FOR STA USE
Insert Version 4.3
Approved
Authorized Representative Name / Title Signat
Email Site Engineer STA LL6 Supervisor
ure Rejected
© 2010 Ford Motor Company
Signature Date Image Phone Number Signature/Date Signature/Date
from
Date Revised: 8-Oct-10
file
Capacity Analysis Report version 4.3 Page 1
Date Printed:11/04/2019
Surrogate OEE Summary
Demonstrated GPP = Good Parts Produced NICT = Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) NAT = Net Available Time (hrs/wk) OEE = Overall Equipment Effectiveness [GPP/(NAT/NPICT)]
(Surrogate) Performance
History
WK# Date (mm/dd/yyyy) GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE GPP NICT NAT OEE
WK1 - - - - - - - -
WK2 - - - - - - - -
WK3 - - - - - - - -
WK4 - - - - - - - -
WK5 - - - - - - - -
WK6 - - - - - - - -
WK7 - - - - - - - -
WK8 - - - - - - - -
WK9 - - - - - - - -
WK10 - - - - - - - -
WK11 - - - - - - - -
WK12 - - - - - - - -
WK13 - - - - - - - -
WK14 - - - - - - - -
WK15 - - - - - - - -
WK16 - - - - - - - -
WK17 - - - - - - - -
WK18 - - - - - - - -
WK19 - - - - - - - -
WK20 - - - - - - - -
WK21 - - - - - - - -
WK22 - - - - - - - -
WK23 - - - - - - - -
WK24 - - - - - - - -
WK25 - - - - - - - -
AVERAGE SURROGATE OEE - - - - - - - -
100.0% 100.0%
Surrogate OEE
90.0% 100.0%
Surrogate OEE
Surrogate OEE
Surrogate OEE
90.0% 90.0%
80.0% 90.0%
80.0% 80.0%
70.0% 80.0%
70.0% 70.0%
70.0%
60.0%
60.0% 60.0%
60.0%
50.0%
50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
40.0%
40.0% 40.0% 40.0%
30.0%
30.0% 30.0% 30.0%
OE OE OE OE
E E E E
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Surrogate OEE
Surrogate OEE
Surrogate OEE
90.0%
Surrogate OEE
90.0% 90.0% 90.0%
Shared Process Loading Plan NICT = Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) Date of Study
Departmental Operating Pattern for Average Weekly Departmental Operating Pattern for Max Weekly
Days / Week
Shifts / Day
Total Hours / Shift
Contractual Planned Downtime - lunch,
breaks, etc. (minutes/shift)
Net Available Time (NAT) (hrs/week)
Demonstrated OEE:
Enter average OEE from most recent
production performance data; Surrogate OEE
tab may be used for this calculation
Loading Plan to meet Average Weekly Loading Plan to meet Max Weekly
Req'd Req'd
Time Req'd @ Time Req'd @
Good % Allocation Good % Allocation
Part Ford Part # or "Non-Ford" NICT Demonstrated NICT Demonstrated
Parts / Minimum Required Parts / Minimum Required
OEE (hrs/week) OEE (hrs/week)
Week Week
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 Other % Allocation - Description
22 Other % Allocation - Description
Percentage of Net Available Time not utilized for production (%) {PM, etc.}
Total % Allocation
If Total % Allocation > 100%, loading plan exceeds capacity