Performance & Competency Management
Performance & Competency Management
Objectives
After studying this unit, you should be able to:
Describe the Process of Performance Appraisal
Explain the Need And Methods for Performance Appraisal
Explain the RSDQ Model of Performance Appraisal in detail
Discuss the concept of Performance Review - Reengineering Performance
Highlight the features of the Appraisal System, Performance Analysis,
Performance Review and Discussion and Performance Monitoring and
Feedback
2.1 Introduction
The employees who are working in the organized sector, the term appraisal process
conjure images of hope and fear simultaneously to them. Appraisal Process provides
them with a hope for a better grade and fear about potential downgrading or a bad
rating by their supervisors/ managers.
The weeks leading up to the appraisal are filled with hectic activity when the
employees get down to evaluating themselves and prepare to market their
achievements during the time for which the appraisal is being conducted. Before
Notes
Accurate Documentation
Notes
Accurate, complete and well stated documentation is the next crucial step to be
performed and maintained by the managers about the employees work and it must start
with the very first day of joining the organization or assigning a new role or task to an
existing employee. An efficient and effective manager will always try to help an
employee in developing his expertise and competences, Creating a Personnel file for
each employee and hence recording his accomplishments, areas for improvement and
regular feedback throughout the year will prove as an ready referral to Manager,
Employee and Organization.
Notes
2.3.6 Discuss the Appraisal with the Employee & Conduct Appraisal Meeting
The fifth step in the appraisal process is to communicate to and discuss with the
employees the results of the appraisal. This is, in fact, one of the most challenging tasks
the manager’s face to present an accurate appraisal to the employees and then make
them accept the appraisal in a constructive manner. A discussion on appraisal enables
employees to know their strengths and weaknesses. This has, in turn, impact on their
future performance. Yes, the impact may be positive or negative depending upon how
the appraisal is presented and discussed with the employees.
Notes Origination of corrective action is the last step of the performance appraisal. The
regions where improvements are much needed are identified and now the constructive
path is to correct or improve the performance.
The corrective action can be of two types. First one is instant and deals
predominantly with indicators and is known as “putting out fires.” And the second one is
basic and investigates into origins of deviations. It tracks to adjust the difference
permanently and it involves time to analyses deviations.
Hence, managers often opt for the immediate action, or say, “put out fires”.
Training, coaching, counselling, etc. is the common examples of corrective actions that
managers initiate to improve the employee performance.
Notes
Notes
Give the employee sufficient notice of the time and place of the meeting. Allow at
least one hour for the discussion. Hold the review in a private place where you will
not be interrupted.
Bring to the meeting the performance review instrument you have completed, the
employee’s self‐assessment if they have one, and any other relevant
documentation, such as the job description, work products, etc.
Open the discussion by stating the purpose of the meeting and summarizing the
points you will be covering.
The objectives for the discussion are to:
Review, discuss and confirm your understanding of the accomplishment of
goals/duties;
Recognize strengths and achievements;
Confirm previously identified areas needing improvement and agree about how
improvement is to be accomplished;
Review the employee’s career development goals;
Set new goals/standards for the next review period;
Agree upon the support you will provide the employee in the coming year.
If the employee has done a self-assessment, consider that in conjunction with your
assessment, and discuss areas of agreement and difference. Consider whether
anything raised in your discussion of the employee’s self-assessment sheds new
light on your assessment, and be prepared to modify your review if appropriate. If
performance meets or exceeds the standards, recognize these accomplishments.
If performance needs improvement, identify specific areas for development and
jointly develop an action plan.
Ask the employee why s/he is not meeting standards. You can offer your own input
on possible causes, but avoid health or disability issues, or other areas protected by
law. The goal of this discussion is for both of you to understand the reasons why the
standards are not being achieved. Ask the employee for potential solutions, and
brainstorm together until you both can agree on specific, practical solutions.
Discuss previously identified areas for improvement. Ask the employee how s/he
plans to improve performance and introduce your own ideas for improvement
planning. No problems should be raised during the review that you have not
discussed with the employee during the review period. Remember to critique the
Notes
Summarize your job responsibilities as you see them. How has your job changed from your current job
description?
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
Did you meet the goal(s) you and/or your supervisor set last year? (If Any)
What goals/initiatives would you like to set for the coming year?
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
What suggestions, if any, would you make to help improve effectiveness in your current position?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………
What other comments, concerns, suggestions or points of discussion would you like to address?
NAME:____________________ TITLE:_________________________
OFFICE:_________________ DIVISION:______________________
INTRODUCTION
The evaluation of an employee’s job performance is an ongoing process and occurs frequently on an informal
basis. This form supports the performance appraisal meeting, which is an addition to, or summary of, the
regular ongoing feedback process. The formal review session is scheduled annually, preferably on the staff
member’s anniversary date of employment.
To provide an opportunity for the supervisor and staff member to review job performance, discuss priorities
among job tasks and, if necessary, develop strategies for job improvement. The performance appraisal shall
not be used for disciplinary reasons. It is solely for staff development purposes.
DIRECTIONS
Prior to the performance appraisal meeting, the staff member may wish to review and complete the optional
Employee Appraisal Discussion Form, and return it to the supervisor 48 hours prior to the meeting. When the
Performance Review & Appraisal Form is completed, both the supervisor and staff member should initial it.
The supervisor should complete this section before the performance appraisal meeting. Each job category
Notes
should be evaluated. If a statement is not applicable, mark it N/A.
RATINGS DEFINITIONS:
JOB FUNCTION
Organization: The employee is able to plan and prioritize work to make the most
efficient use of his/her time.
( ) Outstanding ( ) Commendable ( ) Effective
( ) Needs Improvement ( ) Not Applicable
Decision Making: The employee exercises good judgment and makes decisions within
the scope of the job.
( ) Outstanding ( ) Commendable ( ) Effective
( ) Needs Improvement ( ) Not Applicable
Independence: The employee performs the requirements of the job with minimal
direction and supervision.
( ) Outstanding ( ) Commendable ( ) Effective
( ) Needs Improvement ( ) Not Applicable
INTERPERSONAL SKILLS
Communication: The employee has the ability to interact effectively with the Marist
community and/or visitors.
( ) Outstanding ( ) Commendable ( ) Effective
( ) Needs Improvement ( ) Not Applicable
This section is based on the staff member’s job description. Before the
Performance appraisal meeting, the staff member and supervisor should
Mutually agree on the primary/critical job responsibilities (a minimum of two and a maximum of four) to be
evaluated. The supervisor should then review the agreed-upon responsibilities and evaluate performance in
preparation for the performance appraisal meeting.
1. Specific Tasks/Responsibilities:
2. Specific Tasks/Responsibilities:
3. Specific Tasks/Responsibilities:
4. Specific Tasks/Responsibilities:
Exceptional: () The extraordinary individual who always goes beyond what is required to do
the job. There is not only less management direction, but judgment, resourcefulness, and depth of knowledge
are the highest quality. It is often true that the individual’s proficiency is widely recognized by interfacing
areas. The employee often creates new ways of doing things that change the nature of the job. In short, the
employee is one whose energy, imagination and capacity to produce results clearly set him/her apart from
most workers.
Exceeds
Requirements :( ) The employee does the basics of the job with ease and excellence. Requires minimal
management direction for complex, creative, or crisis-oriented tasks. The employee
normally anticipates and adapts to change in the job environment. Performance is
convincingly better than established standards or expectations.
Meets
Requirements:( ) The employee performs well in all key job responsibilities. The employee does
what is expected at a normal pace.
Needs
Improvement:( ) Performance does not meet the standards established for the job. Work may be
of variable quantity and quality or may be consistently sub-standard. Requires
frequent direction. This rating indicates that performance improvement is
necessary.
COMMENTARIES
Supervisor Comments:
Notes
Employee Comments:
So that you can approach the discussion objectively and with clarity
Notes
Notes
Notes
Notes
Notes
2.9 Summary
The performance review meeting is a formal conversation based upon the informal
conversations that have happened prior. The goal is to make the meeting productive
and produce outcomes that benefit both the employee and the company.
The road to effective performance management is not always an easy one, but
progressing towards a long-term vision by making manageable changes, step-by-step,
will bring about significant results. The points below act as a reminder of some of the
key elements of a successful process.
Communicate and understand purpose and value of process
Set goals effectively
Begin with performance planning
Ensure an ongoing process
Gather information from a number of sources
Document, document, document
Adequately prepare and train managers
Deliver objective reviews that summarize an ongoing process
Link performance management with other talent management processes
Evaluate the process and make it easy, efficient and effective to ensure
participation