Leaching Kinetics and Mechanisms of Surface Reactions During Cyanidation of Gold in The Presence of Pyrite or Stibnite
Leaching Kinetics and Mechanisms of Surface Reactions During Cyanidation of Gold in The Presence of Pyrite or Stibnite
Preprint 04-73
LEACHING KINETICS AND MECHANISMS OF SURFACE REACTIONS DURING
CYANIDATION OF GOLD IN THE PRESENCE OF PYRITE OR STIBNITE
H. Guo
G. Deschênes
A. Pratt
M. Fulton
R. Lastra
Natural Resources Canada
Ottawa, ON, Canada
Results (%)
Elements Ag As Fe Ca S Ca Si Al Ni Mg Pb Te Zn Sb
Pyrite 1.86x10 -3
0.12 30.5 0.15 27.5 1.81 0.78 2.55 0.037 0.81 0.007 0.11 0.018 0.006
Stibnite 1.0x10-3 0.13 0.77 0.018 27.64 1.40 0.22 0.54 0.004 0.4 0.017 0.004 0.003 56.67
RESULTS
Effect of Pyrite
The effect of pyrite concentration in the synthetic gold ore on gold
leaching kinetics is shown in Figure 1. The NaCN consumption data of the
tests were also illustrated.
Effect of Stibnite
Effect of stibnite concentration: In order to choose a suitable NaCN
concentration for the kinetic study, three NaCN concentrations were
tested on the synthetic ore in the absence of stibnite. The results indicate
that gold extraction over 4 hours was only 60% with a cyanide concen-
tration of 150 ppm, and increased to 90% and 99%, respectively when
Figure 5. Effect of dissolved oxygen. pH: 11.5, 250 ppm NaCN, 4
NaCN concentrations of 250 ppm and 500 ppm were used. A NaCN con-
hours, 21°C, 0.05% stibnite
centration of 250 ppm was used for the following leaching kinetic tests.
Five stibnite concentrations were tested and the results are illustrated in
Lower leaching rates were obtained with 3 and 16 ppm DO as
Figure 4.
compared with the leaching rate of 8 ppm DO. The gold extraction over
4 hours decreased from 22% to 11-12%. An optimum DO level exists
Stibnite showed a very strong retarding effect on gold leaching
between 3 and 16 ppm for the synthetic ore. An optimum DO level should
kinetics at a concentration as low as 0.002% (20 ppm). The gold ex-
also exist for natural ores containing antimony and would vary with the
traction over 4 hours was only 38% with 0.002% stibnite compared to
nature of the ore. A low dissolved oxygen level reduced the gold dis-
90% without stibnite. Gold extraction was reduced to 22% at a stibnite
solution. A high level of dissolved oxygen intensified the dissolution of
concentration of 0.05%.
antimony that contaminated the gold surface. Yen and Ahhamirian (1998)
also observed that increasing DO from 8 ppm to 32 ppm and 60 ppm
Effect of O2 concentration: The effect of dissolved oxygen (DO) was
reduced the gold leaching rate.
tested at a stibnite concentration of 0.05%. The DO levels investigated
were 3, 8 and 16 ppm. The results are shown in Figure 5.
Effect of pH: Three levels of pH were tested at a stibnite concentra- Effect of pre-treatment at various pH: The effect of pre-treatment at
tion of 0.05%. The gold extraction over 4 hours was increased from 22% pH 11.5 was tested with and without lead nitrate. A 4 hour pretreatment
to 74% and 93% when the pH was reduced from 11.5 to 10.2 and 9.8. The with 250 g/t lead nitrate increased the gold extraction by 70% in the first
effect is due to the fact that stibnite dissolves slowly in a cyanide solution hour and by 5.1% (from 94% to 99%) in 4 hours as compared with the
at low pH. results of straight cyanidation with 250 g/t lead nitrate addition at the
beginning.
Effect of Pb(NO3) 2 concentration: The effect of lead nitrate con-
centration was tested at pH 11.5 with 0.05% stibnite. Results show that The effect of pretreatment at pH 9.8 and 10.5 without lead nitrate at
100 g/t of Pb(NO3) 2 could partly alleviate the negative effect of stibnite low pH did not have any positive effect on the gold leaching kinetics in the
and the gold extraction over 4 hours was increased from 28% (without presence of 0.05% stibnite.
lead nitrate) to 57% (Figure 6). However, the gold extraction with 100
g/t lead nitrate was still much lower than the 89% extraction obtained in Effect of Pb(NO3) 2 at low temperature (10°C): The addition of 100 g/t
the baseline test (Figure 4). The addition of 250 g/t Pb(NO3) 2 completely lead nitrate had no positive effect on the gold leaching kinetics at 0.05%
eliminated the negative effect of stibnite and the gold extraction was stibnite. The test was repeated and another lead nitrate level of 500 g/t
increased to 94% over 4 hours, which was 5% higher than baseline test was tested. The results are shown in Figure 7.
extraction. The addition of 500 g/t Pb(NO3) 2 further increased the gold
extraction over 4 hours to 98%.
A combination of low pH and lead nitrate addition was the most ef-
fective way to enhance gold leaching kinetics in the presence of stibnite.
Addition of 100 g/t lead nitrate at pH 10.2 and 9.8 increased the gold
extraction over 4 hour to 99.6%. It is also clear that adding lead nitrate at
pH 10.2 and 9.8 dramatically increased the gold extraction to 94.1% and
96.1% with addition of 100 g/t lead nitrate.
The results indicate that the addition of lead nitrate at 10°C did not
show any remarkable effect on gold leaching kinetics. Addition of 500
g/t lead nitrate only increased the gold extraction over 4 hours by 3.9%
from 14% to 18%. It is clear from comparison of the results in Figure 7,
with the results obtained at 21°C, that the efficiency of lead nitrate addi-
tion on enhancing gold leaching kinetics was significantly depressed by
reducing the temperature from 21°C to 10°C. The gold extraction over 4
hours increased by 70.4% from 27.6% to 98.0% with addition of 500 g/t
lead nitrate at 21°C. More work is required to understand the effect of
Figure 6. Effect of lead nitrate on gold leaching at different pH. DO, temperature on lead nitrate.
8 ppm, 250 ppm NaCN, 4 hours, 21°C, 0.05% stibnite.
Mechanism of Pb(NO3) 2: It was observed that Pb(NO3) 2 as well as
Effect of AgNO3 addition: The effect of AgNO3 was tested at pH 11.5 AgNO3 precipitated Sb species (SbO2- and SbO3 -) out of the leach solu-
under a stibnite concentration of 0.05%. The results indicate that the ad- tion. A brown color gradually appeared in the leach cell when lead nitrate
dition of AgNO3 could also alleviate the negative effect of stibnite. Gold was added to the slurry containing stibnite (Figure 8). A darker color was
extraction increased from 29% without AgNO3 to 60% with the addition of observed with a higher concentration of lead nitrate or higher pH. No
250 g/t AgNO3. It is believed that increasing the AgNO3 addition amount color was observed if only quartz and stibnite or quartz and lead nitrate
could further improve the gold extraction. This test was conducted for were present in the slurry.
theoretical purposes to support the hypothesis that precipitation of Sb
species out of the leaching solution actually contributed to the improve-
ment of the gold leaching kinetics.
The results of EDS and XPS indicate that the precipitate is likely
an Sb-Pb-S-O compound. The main S peak in Figure 9 was masked by
the huge Pb peak between 2 keV and 4 keV. The presence of S in the
precipitate was detected by XPS. The chemical analysis of the precipitate
indicate that it contains 66.1% Pb, 5.7% S, 14.1% Sb and 14.1% O. The
compound has an approximate formula: Pb3.2S1.8Sb1.2O8.9.
The XPS peaks for Sb and Au for the gold coupon surfaces obtained
in tests 2, 3 and 4 are shown in Figures 11 and 12, respectively.
Figure 11. XPS spectra of Sb 3d peaks for the gold coupon surface
Figure 14 illustrates the comparison of the Au 4f peaks of the XPS
spectra obtained at different DO levels.
Figure 13 shows that the Sb concentration on the gold coupon
The Au 4f spectrum further confirms the trend of Au atom percent-
surface did not change much (increased from 14% to 15% and 17% when
age detectable on the coupon surface as shown in Figure 13.
the dissolved oxygen in the leaching slurry was increased from 3 ppm to 8
and 16 ppm). The O concentration on the coupon surface also increased
from 30% to 33% and 38%. Very little sulfur (≤ 0.05%) was detected on
the surface of the three coupons.
DISCUSSION detected in the passivation film indicating that it was not a thioantimonite
film as suggested by Hedley and Tabachnick (1968). The Sb atoms
The results of this study should be considered as a guide to under- on the gold surface had an Sb 3d5/2 binding energy of 350.6 eV, which
standing the mechanisms and reaction products involved in the retarding indicated that Sb was in the form of Sb5+, possibly Sb2O5. The stibnite in
effect of pyrite and stibnite on gold leaching. The leaching conditions do the slurry was subjected to the following reactions:
not necessarily apply directly to leaching of gold ores, which normally
require a much longer contact time. Sb2S3 + 8OH - = 2SbO2- + 3S° + 4H2O + 6e - (1)
A high concentration of pyrite has to be present in the slurry to S° + 6OH - = SO32- + 3H2O + 4e - (2)
observe a detrimental effect on the gold leaching rate. It is assumed the
reaction products of pyrite, such as Fe(OH) 3 form a passivation film on 2SbO2- + 2OH - = Sb2O5 + H2O + 4e - (3)
the gold slowing down the dissolution rate. The addition of lead nitrate
totally eliminated the impact of pyrite on the gold leaching rate. Since it is the Sb species which played a key role in passivating the
gold surface, other antimony minerals such as stibiconite (Sb3O6 (OH)),
Stibnite has a very strong retarding effect on gold leaching, and antimony oxide (Sb2O3) could also have a retarding effect on gold cya-
oxygen enrichment made the situation worse. The improvement of the nidation through the following reaction (stibnite being easily oxidized to
gold dissolution by lead nitrate was previously demonstrated by Hedley Sb3O6 (OH) and Sb2O3).
and Tabachnick. The addition of lead nitrate reduced the formation of a
precipitate, identified as Sb2O5 at the surface of gold. Sb3O6 (OH) + 3OH - = 2SbO3 - + SbO2- + 2H2O (4)
The XPS of the gold surface conditioned in a slurry containing stib- Sb2O3 + 2OH - = 2SbO - + H2O (5)
nite showed Sb oxide species but not sulfur species. This surface layer
retarded the gold leaching rate. The SbO2- ion could be oxidized to Sb2O5 at the gold surface accord-
ing to equation (3).
Although lowering pH was very effective in preventing the contami-
nation of gold surface by Sb species, the gold leaching kinetics indicated CONCLUSIONS
that a pH of 10.2 and the addition of lead nitrate were the most effective
leaching conditions to counteract the effect of stibnite. Using a low pH • A significant retarding effect on the gold leaching rate was
also increases cyanide consumption and requires special measures to observed only with a pyrite concentration of 20%.
deal with the high HCN concentration. • Ag, Fe and S formed a passivation film at the surface of gold and
reduced the leaching rate. Pb2+ reduced the passivating effect of
Since the gold coupon surface was heavily covered by the Sb these impurities and enhanced the gold leaching rate.
compound (Sb2O5) when conditioned in a slurry containing stibnite, only
• Stibnite showed a very strong retarding effect on gold leaching
a small amount of lead (0.3%) was detected on the gold surface after
kinetics at a very low concentration, i.e., 0.002% (20 ppm).
treatment with lead nitrate. The kinetic tests indicated the catalytic effect
of lead nitrate was still functioning as long as the gold surface was acces- • The passivation film was likely an antimony oxide - Sb2O5 Sulphur
sible to the leaching solution. was not a significant contributor in the composition of the pas-
sivation coating in the presence of Sb.
The addition of lead nitrate to the blended gold ore from Fort Knox • Means to alleviate passivation of gold by antimony are the addi-
Mine demonstrated an improvement of gold extraction in spite of the fact tion of Pb(NO3) 2 and/or lowering the pH.
that leaching occurred at low temperature (10°C) (Hollow, et al., 2003b). • A high DO level did not show any positive effect on gold leaching
It is known that stibnite is the major interference in gold leaching for Fort kinetics in the presence of Sb.
Knox Mine. Lead nitrate proved to have a positive effect because a reten-
tion time of 20 hours is used at Fort Knox Mine while only 4 hours was
used in this study. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The leaching kinetic indicated that the negative effect of stibnite on The authors wish to thank Fort Knox Mine and Goldcorp Red Lake
the gold leaching rate was far more severe than that of pyrite. The brown- Mine for sponsoring this study. Thanks are also given to Jean Cloutier for
ish passivation film was visible to the naked eye. No sulfur species were the fire assays and other analyses, John Graham and Regina Karwowska
for the other analyses.