Chapter 2
Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Figure 2.2 Circuit Diagram of the Buck Converter with Switch Turned On
* x 2 Vs
x1 (2.7)
L L
dVc Vo
iL C (2.8)
dt R
* x1 x2
x2 (2.9)
C RC
Figure 2.3 Circuit Diagram of the Buck Converter with Switch Turned Off
There by,
0 1/ L
A2 (2.24)
1/ C 1/ RC
0
B2 (2.25)
0
C 2 0 1 (2.26)
*
x [A1 D A 2 (1 D)]x [B1D B2 (1 D)]Vs (2.27)
V0 [C1D C2 (1 D)]x (2.28)
The steady state values of the state variables, the sources and the
duty cycle ratio are assumed as,
x = X ; v0 = V0 ; d = D;
AX + BVs = 0 (2.29)
V0 = CX (2.30)
where,
A A1D A 2 (1 D) (2.31)
0 1/ L
A (2.32)
1/ C 1/ RC
B B1D B2 (1 D) (2.33)
29
D / L
B (2.34)
0
C C1D C 2 (1 D) (2.35)
C 0 1 (2.36)
X A 1 BVs (2.38)
Transforming to s-domain,
sx(s) Ax(s) [(A1 A 2 )X (B1 B2 )Vs ]d s (2.43)
Applying laplace transform with zero initial condition and using the
superposition theorem, the small signal duty cycle d to output v0, the transfer
function can be obtained considering zero line perturbation.
30
0 0
A1 A 2 (2.46)
0 0
1/ L
B1 B2 (2.47)
0
C1 C 2 0 0 (2.48)
It can be seen from equation 2.49, that for the buck converter the
control-to-output transfer function is dependent on the operating point and its
validity is limited to in and around the operating point. As the operating
region of the buck converter is wide, the conventional way of designing the
controllers involves selecting the worst case operating point, i.e. under the
minimum line and maximum load conditions. The transfer function of the
buck converter under the worst case conditions is taken as the base in the
design of the controller.
through the inductor increases and the energy stored in the inductor builds up.
In mode 2 the switch is off, current through the inductor continues to flow via
the diode D, the RC network and back to the source. The inductor releases its
energy and the polarity of inductor voltage is such that its terminal connected
to the diode is positive with respect to its other terminal connected to the
source.
i
x L (2.52)
Vc
dVc Vo
C 0 (2.57)
dt R
*
x2
x2 (2.58)
RC
Thereby,
0 0
A1 (2.61)
0 1/ RC
1/ L
B1 (2.62)
0
C1 0 1 (2.63)
A A1D A 2 (1 D) (2.75)
0 (1 D) / L
A (2.76)
(1 D) / C 1/ RC
B B1D B2 (1 D) (2.77)
1/ L
B (2.78)
0
C C1D C 2 (1 D) (2.79)
C 0 1 (2.80)
X A 1 BVs (2.82)
Vs LC 1/ RLC
X (1 D) / LC (2.83)
(1 D)2
Simplifying,
*
x Ax [(A1 A 2 )X (B1 B2 )Vs ]d (2.86)
v 0 Cx [(C1 C 2 )X]d (2.87)
Transforming to s-domain,
sx(s) Ax(s) [(A1 A 2 )X (B1 B2 )Vs ]d(s) (2.88)
v o (s) Cx(s) [(C1 C 2 )X]d(s) (2.89)
36
Applying laplace transform with zero initial condition and using the
superposition theorem, the small signal duty cycle d to outputV0 the transfer
function can be obtained considering zero line perturbation.
v o (s)
C[sI A]1[(A1 A 2 )X (B1 B2 )Vs ] C1 C2 )X (2.90)
d(s)
0 1/ L
A1 A 2 (2.91)
1/ C 0
0
B1 B2 (2.92)
0
C1 C 2 0 0 (2.93)
It can be seen from equation 2.94, that for the boost converter, the
control-to-output transfer function is dependent on the operating point and its
validity is limited to in and around the operating point. As the operating
region of the boost converter is wide, the conventional way of designing the
controllers involves selecting the worst case operating point, i.e. under the
minimum line and maximum load conditions. The transfer function of the
boost converter under the worse case conditions is taken as the base in the
design of the controller.
37
2.4 CONCLUSION