Safety Instrumented System
Safety Instrumented System
ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION
PDVSA N° TITLE
APPD.BY Youhad Kerbaje DATE OCT.02 APPD.BY Raúl Rivero DATE OCT.02
Index
1 PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3.1 Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3.2 The International Society for Measurement and Control (ISA) . . . . . . . . . 2
3.3 American Petroleum Institute (API) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4 MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS (EXCEPTIONS)
OF ISA 84.01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION PDVSA K–336
REVISION DATE
PDVSA SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS 2 OCT.02
Page 2
Menú Principal Indice manual Indice volumen Indice norma
1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this specification is to provide Engineers and Vendors with the
requirements for design and supply of Safety Instrumented Systems for PDVSA
Oil and Gas facilities, including utilities systems. It’s not intended for using in
petrochemical facilities, so appropriate advising is recommended.
This specification is not applicable for PDVSA storage tank, truck loading or marine
terminal facilities, pilot plants, gasoline service stations and other non–industrial
facilities.
2 SCOPE
ISA–S84.01–1996 has been accepted by PDVSA as its standard for Safety
Instrumented Systems, with the amendments indicated in this document. All
modifications comply with PDVSA requirements and are listed herein, in
accordance with each ISA S84.01 Standard Clause number.
The requirements of this specification are modifications, additions and/or deletions
(exceptions) to ISA–S84.01–1996, Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for
the Process Industries. The section, paragraph, clause, table and figure numbers
and the associated headings used in this specification correspond to the ones
used in ISA–S84.01–1996. Since this specification does not take exception to all
the requirements in ISA S84.01, the section/paragraph/clause/table/figure
numbers in this specification may not be sequential. It’s clearly understood that
sections, paragraphs, clauses, tables or figures of ISA 84.01 not mentioned
in this specification have been adopted without changes.
3 REFERENCES
3.1 Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA)
K–300 Introduction to PDVSA Instrumentation
IR–P–01 Safety Interlock Systems, Emergency Isolation, Emergency
Depressurization and Emergency Venting Systems
IR–S–02 Criterios para el Análisis Cuantitativo de Riesgos
SI–S–01 Gerencia de la Seguridad de los Procesos – Lineamientos
Corporativos
3.2 ISA, The International Society for Measurement and Control
S84.01 Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process
Industries
3.3 American Petroleum Institute (API)
Spec. 6D Specification for Pipeline Valves (Gate, Plug, Ball, and Check
Valves)
ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION PDVSA K–336
REVISION DATE
PDVSA SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS 2 OCT.02
Page 3
Menú Principal Indice manual Indice volumen Indice norma
Logic
Final
Sensors
Solver Elements
Logic
This only happens when there is a demand and the SIS is in a fault
mode.
3.1.66 Probability of Demand: a numeric value that represents the
chance of demand occurrence.
3.1.67 Risk Reduction Factor (RRF): The SIS ability to mitigate a process
risk. The Risk Reduction Factor is defined as The inverse of
Probability of Failure on Demand average (PFD). RRF=1/PFD.
Thus, SIL levels may also be determined by the RRF under the
following ranges: SIL1 [10,100], SIL2 [100,1000], SIL 3
[1000,10000].
3.1.68 Risk: Measure of economic loss, environmental damage or
human injury in terms of an accident probability of occurrence
(frequency) and the magnitude of loss, environmental damage or
injuries (consequences).
3.1.69 Fault Tree: a graphic representation of the logic relationship of
equipment failure and human errors that might result in an
accident. The main purpose of the Fault Tree is to determine if the
proposed design is acceptable or not, in terms of complying with
a predetermined reliability or safety standard.
3.1.70 Fault Tree Analysis: a method that identifies all events or
combinations of events (i.e. equipment failure, human errors) that
might create an undesirable situation. It is an inferential technique
that provides the methodology to determine the causes given a
known outcome.
3.1.71 Independent Protection Layer (IPL): A system or subsystem
specifically designed to reduce the likelihood or severity of the
impact of an identified hazardous event by a large factor, i.e. at
least by a 100 fold reduction in likelihood. An IPL must be
independent of other protection layers associated with the
identified hazardous event, as well as dependable, and auditable.
Numeral 3.2: Acronyms.
The following acronyms shall be added to this part:
– FDT: Fraction Dead Time.
– RRF: Risk Reduction Factor.
– FTA: Fault Tree Analysis.
– MOS.: Maintenance Override Switches
– IPL: Independent Protection Layer
– GSP: Gerencia de la Seguridad de los Procesos
ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION PDVSA K–336
REVISION DATE
PDVSA SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS 2 OCT.02
Page 5
Menú Principal Indice manual Indice volumen Indice norma
7.4.3.1.2 Valves for the SIS shall comply with API 6D and API 607 Standard.
7.4.3.1.3 Where a Control Valve function as an Final Element for a SIL 1 or
higher, The SIS shall have priority over the BPCS.
7.4.3.1.4 SIS Valves classified as SIL 1 or higher shall not be provided with
a hand wheel or a bypass as these increase the unrevealed failure
rate of the final element.
7.4.3.1.5 SIS Valves classified as SIL 1 or higher should be air operated and
spring loaded or have an potential energy stored in the actuator
itself to assure the capability to go to a predetermined safe state
in the event of a specific malfunction.
7.4.3.1.6 Electric motor operated valves without spring return shall not be
used as the only final element for SIL 1 or higher.
Numeral 7.5 “Interfaces”
A new numeral 7.5.1.4 shall be added to read: Application changes on line shall
not be allowed. In case that it is required to make changes on line, a procedure to
guarantee the system safety shall be established.
Numeral 7.6 “Power Sources”
The following items shall be added:
7.6.2 Electrical power source redundancy, if required, shall be provided
either by using an alternate source with automatic transfer, an
uninterruptible power supply (UPS), or battery backup by an
alternate source.
7.6.3 Circuit breakers and fuses shall be coordinated for selective
operation such that the electrical protective device closest to the
fault operates first selected operation.
7.6.4 Input and Output modules or racks shall be designed to have
separate power distribution and fused to minimize common cause
failure in case of a wiring fault. The fuses shall be properly sized
in order to assure minimum impact on system performance in
case of short circuit.
7.6.5 Fuses for sensors and final elements shall be located within the
Logic Solver cabinets.
7.6.6 Power supply to field devices shall be 24 Vdc unless drops of more
than 3 volts occurs. Under such circumstances alternate voltage
levels may be considered (125 Vdc). Mixing of voltage levels
within a system is not allowed.
7.6.7 All systems shall be fused immediately adjacent to the distribution
bus. On ungrounded systems both conductors shall be fused.
Miniature circuit breakers and/or disconnect switches shall be
ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION PDVSA K–336
REVISION DATE
PDVSA SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS 2 OCT.02
Page 10
Menú Principal Indice manual Indice volumen Indice norma