0% found this document useful (0 votes)
125 views7 pages

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

This document provides guidelines for summarizing school profile and performance indicator data in 13 categories for an SRC Summary report. The summaries should include data from the last 3 years presented in graphs and tables showing metrics like enrolment numbers by gender, dropout rates by cause, literacy levels, and results from achievement tests and governance assessments. The goal is to concisely present key data on access, quality, and governance for a school.

Uploaded by

philip omar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
125 views7 pages

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

This document provides guidelines for summarizing school profile and performance indicator data in 13 categories for an SRC Summary report. The summaries should include data from the last 3 years presented in graphs and tables showing metrics like enrolment numbers by gender, dropout rates by cause, literacy levels, and results from achievement tests and governance assessments. The goal is to concisely present key data on access, quality, and governance for a school.

Uploaded by

philip omar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Period of
School Profile Description Remarks Data Presentation Data Source/Forms
Reporting
1. Enrolment ● Total number of ● Optional: Mid-year Stacked bar graph by gender SF-1: School Register;
learners enrolled If the school has (BoSY data) per year EBEIS
o By gender special programs, they Year-end For types of learners, a pie
o Last 3 years can also present in a (EoSY data) graph can be used
separate graph the
enrolment number of Year-End data can be a
the different types of comparison with the Mid-Year
learners by program data (line on bar graph)
(e.g. SPED, ADM, ALS,
IPEd, ALIVE) of the
current year – schools
can show the total for
each type of learner
2. Health and  Number of learners ● No. of severely Mid-year Stacked bar graph by gender Nutritional Status Report
nutritional status who are severely wasted or wasted Year-end per key stage
wasted/wasted
 By gender
 For every key stage
 (K-3, 4-6, JHS, SHS)
 Current year
3. Learners ● The count of Year-end Table per grade level that SF-3: Books Issued and
materials* shortages/excess learners shows the number of Returned; Physical Count
materials per grade level shortage/excess learners of Inventories
based on what the materials (by subject)
students are using during
the School Year
● Only subjects which
have shortage/excess
learners materials will be
listed per grade level
● Current year
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

4. Teachers’ ● Number of teachers Mid-year Bar graph by kind/type of Accomplishment report


professional who attended Year-end professional development
development* training/further studies
● By kind/type of
professional development
(e.g. ICT, Further studies,
INSET, LAC, etc)
● Current year

5. Funding ● Funding amount and Mid-year Pie graph by funding source Financial reports;
sources* sources (MOOE, LGU, Year-end Monthly liquidation
canteen, donors, etc.) reports
● Current year

6. School awards ● Top 3 awards/ Mid-year Table Accomplishment report


and recognitions* recognition from award- Year-end
giving bodies duly
recognized by DepEd
● Listing by title, award-
giving body, level
(school, division,
regional, national,
international)
● Categorized into
student, teacher, school
head, and school awards
● Current year
*Data not found in the EBEIS
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

Performance Period of
Description Remarks Data Presentation Data Source/Forms
Indicators Reporting
ACCESS
7. Number and ● Count and percentage of learners Year-end Stacked bar graph by SF-4: Monthly
rate of dropouts who do not finish a particular grade cause per year; Learner’s Movement
by cause level. (It does not capture learners percentage can be and Attendance; SF-2:
who finish a grade level but do not shown through a line Daily Attendance
enrol in the next grade level the graph over the bar Report of Learners;
following school year) graph EBEIS
● Look at the five (5) major causes of
dropout in the school
● Last 3 years
QUALITY
8. Percentage of ● Percentage of learners who Year-end Bar graph EBEIS: Enrolment
learners who completed the school year data; SF-6:
completed the ● Number of promoted learners over Summarized Report on
School Year number of total learners x 100 Promotion and Level of
(Promotion Rate) ● Per grade level Proficiency
● Current year

9. National ● MPS per subject ● In the absence of Year-end Bar graph by MPS of Report from NETRC
Achievement Test ● Grade 6/10 results for complete NAT scores, school can each subject
(NAT) – by Mean schools use the School
Percentage Score ● Grade 3/8 results for incomplete Readiness Year-End
(MPS) schools Assessment (SReYA) in
● Current year Elementary OR the
general average of
pupils in the highest
grade level offering
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

10. Literacy level ● Total number of learners who are in ● In the absence of a Mid-year Bar graphs showing Philippine Informal
the frustration, instructional, and tool to measure Year-end oral and silent Reading Inventory
independent levels for English and literacy, schools can reading results (one (PHIL-IRI); McCall-
Filipino (oral and silent reading) use PHIL-IRI results or for English and Crab Reading
● Should show pre and post test any existing tool to Filipino) Comprehension
results measure literacy Examination or its
● If PHIL-IRI is used, will cover equivalent
grades 2-6 only
● Current year
GOVERNANCE
11. School-Based ● School level based on SBM ● Use SBM Assessment Year-end SBM Level and its SBM Assessment
Management Assessment corresponding
Assessment Level qualitative
interpretation
12. Child-Friendly ● Survey to be accomplished by the ● Use Child-Friendly Year-end Points and status Child-Friendly School
School Survey School Planning Team School Self-Assessment Self-Assessment
result* ● Based on CFSS point system: Guide
o 25-29 points: Child-Friendly
School
o 30-34 points: Outstanding Child-
Friendly School
o 35 and above points: Very
Outstanding Child-Friendly School
● Current year
13. Stakeholders’ There will be two (2) data sets: Mid-year For percentage: Attendance sheets;
participation* 1. Percentage (number of Year-end stacked bar graph by DepEd order 18:
attendees over those invited) activity (co- School Calendar
of parents/guardians and curricular, extra-
other stakeholders who attend curricular, meetings/
during: assemblies) per
o Co-curricular activities stakeholder
(Science month, Reading
month, contests, etc.) For total
o Extra-curricular activities contribution: stacked
(Boy Scouts, Brigada bar graph by type of
Eskwela, sports fests, contribution per
etc.) reporting period, with
total
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

o Meetings and Assemblies


(SIP, CI, General PTA,
etc.)
 Current year
2. Total contribution (in kind,
man-hours, etc.) of
stakeholders which are
accounted
 Current year
 By reporting period (Mid-
year and Year-end)

14. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Ratio per grade level SF-7: School Personnel
Teacher ratio learners to teachers against the standard: shown as bar graph; Assignment List and
o Kinder (25:1) Standard can be Basic Profile; SF-1:
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) shown as line graph School Register; EBEIS
o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) over the bar graph
o SHS (40:1)
● Per grade level
● Current year
15. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Ratio per grade level EBEIS: Facilities and
Classroom learners to classrooms against the shown as bar graph; Structures
ratio standard:
o Kinder (25:1) Standard can be
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) shown as line graph
o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) over the bar graph
o SHS (40:1)
● Per grade level
● Current year
16. Learner-  Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Line graph EBEIS: Facilities and
Toilet ratio learners to functional toilets against Structures
standards (50:1)
 Total number
 By gender
 Current year
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information

17. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of Year-end Line graph Consolidated Report on
Seat ratio learners to seats against the standard Desk/Armchairs for ES
(1:1) and SS; EBEIS
● Total number
● Current year
Note: CFS – Child-Friendly School (The Child-Friendly School Assessment was made by UNICEF. The concept for establishing a Child-Friendly School System (CFSS) in the
Philippines was introduced in 1999 and is currently being reviewed so it can be utilized/integrated in school planning, monitoring and evaluation).
SF – School Forms
*Data not found in the EBEIS
ANNEX 11 SRC Summary of Information
Status of School Period of
Description Remarks Data Presentation Data Source/Forms
Projects Reporting
18. Status of Annual ● The progress of CI projects ● The school will decide Mid-year Graphs may differ
Implementation Plan ● Data sets may differ depending which major projects to Year-end
(AIP)/Continuous on what the school wants to present put in the SRC but our
Improvement (CI) ● Current year recommendation is to
Projects* report the top 3 priority
projects
● Include the report on
baseline, and also the
endline when applicable
19. Other stakeholders’ ● Reports done by other ● The school may Mid-year Graphs may differ
accomplishments* stakeholders on their choose the top 3 Year-end
initiatives/activities independent stakeholder
from the PIA/CI projects (e.g. accomplishments/initiati
activities of the SGC, SPG/SSG, ves/activities
etc.)
● Data sets may differ depending
on the initiatives/activities of the
stakeholders
● Current year

*Data not found in the EBEIS

You might also like