rexresearch.

com

The New Science

by

Wilbert B. SMITH
(1910-1962)
Copyright 1964 by Murl Smith
Published by Fenn-Graphic Publishing Co., Ltd (Canada)
Assembled by W. B. Smith from data obtained from beings more advanced than we
are.

Section One

The New Science

Foreword
A first reading of this book will undoubtedly leave the reader with many questions in
mind, and with few answers immediately obtainable. As a work which purports to
provide a comprehensive yet simplified understanding of the universe and of reality as
we observe it, it will appear most novel in its development, intricate in its
ramifications, and will challenge the most vivid imagination. Yet, the implications are
far-reaching in their significance and the applications innumerable. The serious reader
is advised to peruse it often, and most of, to THINK.
THE NEW SCIENCE attempts to provide a fundamental understanding of reality in
general, and of our known universe in particular. It advances a unified concept
governing our awareness of reality, explains the generation of this reality, and
describes the factors which mold it into the numerous forms in which we find it. To
some extent it is not a "first" attempt. For centuries philosophers and scientists have,
with varying degrees of success, framed hypotheses with the same considered
objective. It may be said that such attempts at a unified understanding of the universe
is a natural result of man's inquisitiveness and his searching need of the ultimate
order. THE NEW SCIENCE is unique, however, in bringing into play not only those
factors which are usually considered as physical and material, but also the more subtle
yet no less important influence of the mental and spiritual.
The work was produced after many years of thought and investigation. Existing
concepts were considered in all their scope and depth. It is the belief of many that
numerous "clues" were obtained from civilizations much more advanced than ours.
Some of the more physical aspects were confirmed by actual experiment and the less
tangible considerations tested against observable data and evaluated for consistency.
At this point, a few words about the author would seem appropriate.
Wibert Brockhouse Smith was born at Lethbridge, in the Province of Alberta, Canada
on the 17th of February, 1910. He exhibited early in life an eager interest in the nature
of things. At the age of 15, he wrote a treatise dealing with the controversial concept
of perpetual motion. He was also the author of several scientific novels. After having
obtained his S. SC. And M. Sc. Degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University
of Columbia in 1933 and 1934, he spent four years on the staff of radio station CJOR
in Vancouver, BC, where he became chief engineer. In 1939 he joined the Department
of Transport of Canada, where he continued his work in the field of broadcasting and
...
[missing text]
 Introduction
We find ourselves in this Universe, and we are aware of it. We strive to understand it,
and to do so we use all means at our disposal. We observe and speculate; we look and
sometimes we find; we ask many questions and get many answers. If the questions are
proper we get proper answers, but if they are not proper questions we get indefinite
answers or no answers at all.
Sometimes we cannot distinguish between cause and effect or the phenomenon and
the effect of the phenomenon. Sometimes we mistake the shadow for the substance
and pass by the reality while we pursue the image.
Often we are so enamoured of our own brilliance that we cannot see the little glints of
Truth that line our way. Many shining nuggets of Truth lie buried at our feet and if we
are not too proud to dig we will find them.
There are certain fundamental Truths in this Universe and if we are prepared to accept
them we can use them as tools for its better Understanding.
No principal can be described or satisfactorily defined except in terms of concepts
which are more basic, until one basic concept is reached which in itself cannot be
defined at all, but which will define all other concepts.
The Universe contains no anomalies, and the appearance of an anomaly is warning
that our understanding is inadequate.
Mathematics must be the servant of Understanding and not its master. Equations, by
their very nature, cannot discover; they can only yield relationships derived from the
initial statements and which were inherently in them when they were stated.
Truth is not hidden; it is available to all and is the same for all. Apparent differences
must be due to inadequate understanding.
 Chapter I

The Basic Concept

Whatever might be the origin of this Universe, of one thing we can be reasonable
sure, that it is within "nothing at all". If it "started", then it must have started from
nothing at all. It always was, this it has nothing at all around it. Whatever there might
be beyond this "nothing at all" we have no way of knowing for we are within it and of
this Universe and have no concept beyond it.
This idea of nothing at all is a most difficult one to come to grips with, but it is an
absolute necessity to an understanding of even the first ideas of cosmology. Nothing
at all means exactly what it says: NOTHING AT ALL; no space, no time, no
substance, no energy, no change. To approach it one must slough off all reality and
proceed deliberately into the void of nothingness. It is something extremely personal
which must be experienced by the individual as a basic exercise; it is something
which cannot be "taught". Most people recoil from the idea of nothing at all, feeling
that it is akin to annihilation, which it is, but we must know of "nothing at all" before
we can understand the basic concept upon which our Universe is built. Subsequent
lessons are futile without this basic understanding.
Having become aware of nothing at all, there is only awareness and nothing at all, and
Awareness injects into nothing at all a concept which will render it unique. Since no
concept of any kind can be defined except in terms of that which is more basic, this
Concept cannot be defined, and we may use it only in defining concepts which are
less basic. Since this Concept is the basis of our Universe, its derivatives must be the
basic parameters of it, and in itself it must remain the nameless Reality.
We do not know if this basic Reality exists independently from Awareness or whether
one is the consequence of the other; or whether in the final analysis they are in fact
one and the same. In any case we do know, or think that we know, that Reality does
exist and we are aware of it. But we do not know how far beyond us the Awareness
extends, and we must either postpone this determination pending a better
understanding or accept the statements by other entities who are presumably more
advanced than we are that Awareness is universal and extends throughout all Reality
and has a particular relationship thereto which will be discussed later.
Our physical senses are very limited and we can observe directly only certain aspects
of our Universe, and these only within strictly limited ranges. However, as our
understanding increases we are able to devise ways and means for extending our
sense both in range and scope, which in turn leads to better understanding. But we
must always remember in thus extending our senses to distinguish between the
language of observation and its translation into the language of our senses, lest we
miss the phenomenon while inspecting its effect. Also, since the information we get
through extensions of our senses is essentially "second hand", we must be doubly sure
that it is truly what we think it is, that it is in fact "the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth."
There are two ways of "learning", memorizing and understanding. No matter how
good memory is it can never do more than regurgitate that which has been
assimilated, without form and undigested. A library is an excellent memory but its
understanding is nil. Understanding however allows one to KNOW and is not limited
to material which has already been assimilated. Further, understanding can extrapolate
while memory cannot even interpolate. Therefore, in dealing with the Basic Concept
of the Universe which is Nothing-At-All, mere memory is not good enough;
understanding must be used, otherwise the whole exercise is meaningless and we
cannot KNOW.
In striving to attain the knowledge of Nothing-At-All and the basic concept of Reality
within it, words are hopelessly inadequate because by their very nature words are
merely symbols in which there is some degree of common understanding. As yet we
have no words for that which is basic, and we must attain the understanding of it and
then carry this understanding into whatever language we find convenient. But
however we may approach the subject, the understanding of it is entirely personal. As
one of the people from "elsewhere" once stated, "I cannot teach you; I can only help
you to learn!"
 Chapter II

The Quadrature Concept

Having understood Nothing-At-All and the basic concept of Reality within it, we
must next understand the relationship of Awareness to these concepts. Whether or not
Awareness and Reality are the one and same is probably the Creator's secret, but to us
at least they seem to be separate and through the one we observe the other.
Realizing that at this stage we have not yet even approached the basic or derived
parameters of the Universe, we have no understood framework within which t explore
the relationship of Awareness to Reality. Also, since the only basic concept we have
at this stage is the nameless one injected into Nothing-At-All, it is only this which we
can use to define the higher concepts. Therefore, the only possible understanding of
the relationship of Awareness to reality must be determined from that which is
inherent within the understanding of both.
We could define the Quadrature Concept as the relationship of Awareness to Reality,
and to some a definition of this nature may be adequate, but it would carry little or no
understanding, and great difficulties would arise later when this concept is needed to
understand the derivation and relationships between the twelve fundamental
parameters. Therefore, a little time and effort spent at this stage to understand this
relationship will pay large dividends later. Through the symbology of words and
through analogy an attempt will be made to bracket this concept and bring it into
approximate focus, and after that only individual and personal effort will bring it into
precise focus and understanding will be attained.
Our personal; experience with awareness is largely confined to the operation of our
senses. If we see something, and can see all sides of it, we usually have a pretty good
idea of what it looks like. Also, if we can feel it all over we can conclude quite a bit
about its shape, temperature, texture, etc. We get more information from any sounds
which it may make, or any smells which it may exude. Maybe we may even want to
taste it. If we can get at it sufficiently to use most or all of our senses on it we can
form a pretty good idea of what it is, and if we met it again we would probably
recognize it. What then is the mechanism by which our awareness obtains this
information?
If we find ourselves in a certain situation, such as being caught out in a storm, our
senses respond to certain stimuli and we arrive at certain conclusions. Thereafter we
have a degree of understanding of that particular situation, and would have no trouble
recognizing or identifying it if we ever met it again.
Emotional responses, stemming sometimes from very restricted stimulation, can be
distinguished and identified, and to a certain degree passed along to others if they are
coded through their own experience to receive such information. Under these
circumstances we can say that such emotions are "understood", but just what is the
relationship of Awareness to them?
When we get into the area of abstracts such as mathematics, physical relationships
and the like, logic and intuition extend the range and scope of our senses, but there
still exists that mysterious relationship between Awareness and Reality.
In the transcendental area involving extra sensory perception, estannation, and those
other capabilities of the mind which as yet are only vaguely appreciated, we also find
a definite and determinable relationship between Awareness and Reality. In fact,
anything about which we can think, if it in any way involves an aspect of the universe,
must implicate and make use of this relationship. In the ultimate the Quadrature
Concept is the link by which Awareness observes and Understands Reality.
Mathematics is a discipline in which many people have a fair understanding, and
within which one facet of the Quadrature Concept manifest most elegantly. Geometry,
complex algebra, and vectors all make use of a special relationship in which one line
is at right angles to another. Various properties, some of which are obvious and some
which are not so obvious, have been ascribed to this quadrature relationship between
lines. In fact, whole mathematical philosophies have been developed around this
relationship, and their practical application has given us electrical current, radio,
aeronautics, and many others. In mathematics the Quadrature Concept manifests as
two lines mutually at right angles, or to a line which has been subjected to an
operation by the square root of minus one from its previous position. Successive
operations yield relationships which are the cornerstones of various branches of
mathematics. But the universal Quadrature Concept extends much beyond its mere
mathematical application, interesting though this may be, and is in fact the Concept
which links Awareness with the Concept which is fundamental.
 Chapter III

The Space Fabric

Our Universe appears to us as an enormous, tremendously complicated system, with
myriads of actions and reactions, functions and functional derivatives, and it is hard to
realize that it is all a manifestation of a single basic concept in Nothing-At-All. We
suspect, correctly, that there must be many "layers" or "levels" between the basic
concept and what we observe around us. It is up these levels that we must work our
way to an understanding of the universe, rather than downwards.
Anyone who is at all familiar with modern physics is, no doubt, appalled at its
complexity, confused by the many correction and perturbation factors, and amazed at
the many weird theories propounded in all sincerity to explain observations in terms
of "established principles". Anomalies are the rule rather than the exception, and the
amount of data which just won't fit is colossal. All in all it is fairly obvious that this
view of the Universe is bogging down and we are in reality conjuring up a
mathematical monstrosity and raising it to Deity status. It is truly the modern Golden
Calf.
It is much more difficult to conceive of a universe which is basically highly complex
but possible of breaking down into simpler units than to conceive of a Universe in
which everything is built up of different aspects and combinations of these aspects of
a single basic Reality. Therefore, why not tread again the path which was trodden by
the Creator when the universe was established, and start as he did with Nothing-At-
All and place therein the single basic Concept of Reality and study that which may be
derived from it.
We were unable to establish the point of whether or not there is any interdependence
between Reality and Awareness, and we may never be able to do so, but we must take
it that they both do in fact exist, otherwise the whole exercise becomes meaningless
and all is illusion. Therefore, insofar as we are concerned, the Reality of the Universe
exists as we are aware of it.
The first degree of awareness of the basic concept is length. This is a bald statement
and although many other combinations of words could be sued the MEANING is
identical. Again, the understanding of this parameter is a personal matter and the mere
reiteration of a formula will never convey understanding. Hence another personal visit
into Nothing-At-All and a first hand view of the basic concept is called for. The
viewing should be by means of the Quadrature Concept and, if correctly carried out to
the exclusion of all else, that which is viewed will be the concept of length. This is the
First Parameter, or as it might fairly be put at this point, the First Dimension.
[Planck's Constant, *L]
Now, if the Quadrature Concept is again applied to the basic Concept of Reality,
taking into account the already established Parameter of Length, and Area will be
established, which is the Second Parameter. This Area is the true Second Dimension,
thus making Volume the true Third Dimension, and for similar reasons another
Length at right angles to the other two could not qualify.
Hence, Awareness of the basic concept of Reality, through successive applications of
the Quadrature Concept has established a fabric of three Parameters, Length, Area and
Volume, containing One, Two, and Three conventional Dimensions. This is the Space
Fabric, and establishes a place for the Universe, which is at once simple and possible
of understanding. There is no need for Warps, Foreshortenings, and all the other
attachments appended to Space by conventional science to avoid facing the Universe
as the Creator faced it, from the viewpoint of Nothing-At-All.
At this point it may be well to say something about Zero and Infinity. Originally these
were mathematical concepts which gradually became established in our consciousness
even though to most people they never had any real meanings. Mathematically it is
possible to evolve quite satisfactory definitions for Zero and infinity, and so long as
they are confined to mathematics we can get along with them quite well. But when we
try to become aware of zero or infinity as a personal experience, we find it most
difficult. It is only through the Quadrature Concept that we can become aware of
these two extremes at all, but if we do view them "in quadrature" we find them quite
understandable; in fact, they become, they become as real as any other numbers.
We can say that Zero is the smallest number in which our Awareness has any interest,
and that Infinity is the largest number in which our Awareness has any interest. If we
have the same degree of interest in Zero as we have in Infinity we will find that Unity
is exactly half way between. This is quite apart from any scale of measurement and is
a most important relationship. It is because nothing in the universe is absolute except
the basic concept of reality itself. Even geometrical relationships are tempered by the
means by which we become aware of them.
In establishing the Space Fabric we have understood only the concepts which result
from the application of the Quadrature Concept to the basic Concept of Reality. While
we immediately recognize the results of these operations as the space within which
we dwell we must avoid implying other properties to it than can be derived directly
from the basic premises. In other words, we have only space, with nothing in it.
Anything which we may subsequently define within Space must be derived by further
applications of the Quadrature Concept if it is to have any meaning.
A further word may be said about scales of measurement. Within the space just
described there are no scales of measurement, and any positioning of awareness must
of necessity be entirely arbitrary with one position being quite as good as any other.
Relative positioning must of course remain relative regardless of how many positions
may be established. A corollary of this is that Space is linear no matte where we
investigate it, and this relationship must be accepted as fundamental.
 Chapter IV

The Field Fabric

In establishing the Space Fabric the basic Concept of Reality was operated upon
successively by the Quadrature Concept, giving the concepts of Length, Area and
Volume. Further operations with the Quadrature Concept will yield more
relationships which, when established may be recognized as parameters of the
Universe in which Awareness finds itself.
Since the relationships established to constitute the Field Fabric do not impinge upon
our awareness as directly as does Space except in their composite forms, some sort of
language is needed to facilitate Understanding. To those having a mathematical
background this presents no particular problem since the relationships are merely
those of established Vector Algebra. To those not having such a background,
understanding must be obtained through appreciation of the meanings of the actual
words used. In any case, if the basic principles already set forth have been adequately
understood, there should not be too great difficulty. A visualization of what is going
on, extending upwards from Nothing-At-All, as the Quadrature Concept is applied
successively to Reality and its derivatives, is really what is called for.
The application of the Quadrature Concept to the Third Parameter yields a further
parameter which we might describe as Density or gradient, and is really an expression
of how Reality is distributed in Space. Vectorially it is the scalar view by awareness
of the Volumetric parameter of Reality. It is the scale against which any change in
Reality must be gauged. The Fourth Parameter is therefore essentially Change, the
true Fourth Dimension. There are many interesting implications which will be studied
later in more detail.
If the Quadrature Concept is applied again, another partially familiar vectorial
quantity results, namely Divergence, or the stable condition in which Awareness finds
Reality. This is the Fifth Parameter, which also presents some interesting implications
which will studied later.
The Sixth Parameter is developed by still another application of the Quadrature
Concept to Reality, which gives the vectorial quantity Curl, or Deviation or Reality,
which is essentially the dynamic aspect of Reality as perceived by Awareness.
At this point it is fairly obvious that our Universe is poly-dimensional in the truest
sense of the word, even though the dimensions are not quite what we fancied they
ought to be. They are more correctly parameters and are aspects of Reality established
by Awareness through the mechanism of the Quadrature Concept. Again, we cannot
say whether or not Reality could exist without Awareness, but we believe that they
are actually separate manifestations of the same thing, and one is incomplete without
the other. In any case, so long as we are aware of our Universe it must be through the
Parameters which are inherent in it. And there are six more of them making twelve
Parameters in all, after which the system closes on itself. These Twelve Parameters
are the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the Universe as we are
aware of it.
Although there is a smooth relationship following in the development of the various
parameters we find that they fall naturally into four fabrics of three parameters each.
Just as each parameter has its unique characteristic so each fabric has its own unique
characteristics, which include those of the individual parameters and the
interrelationships between them.
It should be noted that in the development of the three parameters in the field fabric
the Quadrature Concept was applied in each case to the previously established
parameter, and in its broader sense. This should not be confused with the
mathematical manipulation of multiplying the previously established parameter by the
square root of minus one, as this is an operation which will subsequently be employed
and is similar to parallel processes which go on in the space fabric. While this
distinction is fairly obvious in the space fabric it may not be so obvious in the field
fabric.
Let us next look at those aspects of the Universe which impinge upon our awareness
and which may possibly be identified with the parameters of the field fabric. The
Fourth Parameter, Change, reaches our awareness through our concept of Time,
although we have here mistaken the shadow for the substance and vice versa.
A field is a region which has a unique characteristic. The space fabric, in displaying
the characteristic of Change, has a unique characteristic, so that this characteristic
which so appears can qualify as a field. But the filed must be "somewhere" and the
space fabric fills this need, just as Area is necessary for the evolution of the concept
of Volume.
Suppose we call this field of Change a Tempic Field to give it a name of its own, so
that we can study its relationship to those things which impinge upon our awareness.
Inspection of the Concept shows that if the Change is great the tempic field must be
great, but we associate Change with our Concept of Time which is something against
which we gauge a rate of change. Expressed mathematically this rate can be written as
dS/dt which expresses the manner in which something changes with respect to time.
More explicitly this should be written as TS where T is the tempic field operator, and
S is the aspect of Reality upon which it operates. A convenient, though only partially
adequate description of the Tempic Field is "Frequency", since we recognize
frequency as being a certain number of somethings per unit of time, and is
dimensionally the reciprocal of Time.
Heretofore we have always considered Time as an immutable flow against which
everything evolving Change could be measured, whereas, it is really the converse
which is true; Change is the basic concept and Time its derivative. Unfortunately, our
mathematics are geared to the Time concept and will require considerable reworking
to fit them into this more precise concept, but when this is done there will result a
most elegant simplification in all the analysis involving time. In the meantime the
transition in thinking can be made less painful if we merely regard Time as the
consequence of the existence of a Tempic Field, and is by no means fixed.
It may be interesting at this point to mention something about the velocity of light.
This quantity is generally recognized to be something rather basic in our universe,
being the "rate at which space changes with time", but when viewed in the light of
this new field concept is merely the tempic field intensity, or how the tempic field is
distributed in space. We have been told that light doesn't "travel"; it "is", which is an
idea not at all foreign to the field concept. Of course, it follows that the velocity of
light will be a constant only under conditions of constant tempic field, and if this field
changes so will the velocity of light change.
Having had a superficial look at the Tempic Field and its derivation we may now
allow our Awareness to inspect the next parameter which is Divergence to see if it is
something which can be recognized. Previously we noted that Reality had to extend to
infinity from zero in order to establish Space and that unity, so far as Awareness was
concerned, lay half way between. With the application of the Quadrature Concept to
the parameter of Change or Tempic Field, Divergence is established, from which we
derive a starting point a t zero and a finish at infinity. Between these two limits and
through unity there is divergence, which we can recognize as the Electric Field, but
with the exception that there is no point charge at the zero. Our Awareness, however,
established the "charge" at radius unity, with exactly one half of it being "inside" and
the other half being "outside". The real significance of this boundary will be apparent
when we study the tenth parameter.
When Divergence was established by Awareness, the Quadrature Concept was
applied to the Tempic Field, so we may expect within the electric field two quantities,
scalar and vector, or quantity and its manner of distribution. These attributes we
recognize immediately as pertaining to the electric fields with which we have
experience.
While the Tempic field is purely scalar, the application of the Quadrature Concept
gave it an aspect which is vectorial in establishing the Electric Field, in that it now has
"direction" as well as "quantity". In dealing with this parameter both these aspects
should always be included. Otherwise the analysis is bound to be incomplete. In other
words, mere vectorial summation is not sufficient and the scalar values must be
integrated also. Also, we must get away from the idea that they are the manifestation
of the fifth parameter from zero to infinity and in themselves are the reality.
When Awareness inspects Divergence through the Quadrature Concept and
establishes Curl. Similar appreciation results, and we see in Curl many of the
characteristics of the Magnetic Field, but again we have a boundary within which is
half the reality and outside of which is the other half. We call that within (or without)
this boundary the magnetic moment, but again we cannot establish a point source.
Also, dealing with magnetic fields we must always include the scalar as well as the
vectorial aspects.
Just as Area has Length incorporated in it, and Volume has Area incorporated in it, so
has the Electric Field the Tempic Field incorporated in it. Each of these three fields
are mutually at right angles to each other. The three fields together are the
manifestation of Reality in the Field Fabric as perceived by Awareness. The
interrelationships between these various fields manifests to our Awareness as Matter
and Energy, and the great variety of these manifestations is well known to us.
 Chapter V

The Control Fabric

The complete understanding of the Control Fabric is not easy, chiefly because by their
very nature, our mathematics cannot be applied to it directly, and any analysis must be
indirect. However, it is hoped that with some understanding of the Fabric suitable
mathematics will be evolved with which to deal with it. In any case it should be
realized the Understanding comes with increasing Awareness and if the basic
concepts are understood, the rest will follow.
Awareness, inspecting Reality, notices that the Tempic Field is to some extent
everywhere, and except for any arbitrarily prescribed reference point is largely
homogenous. The Electric Field, however, does have a reference point of its own but
other than this it spreads out everywhere. The magnetic Field, in addition to having
both the foregoing characteristics, has another one, namely orientation.
If the Quadrature Concept is applied to the Magnetic Field it will be found that its
orientation can be anything, or in other words, it is Random. The probability of
finding it in any particular orientation is exactly the same as for any other orientation,
and while the Field itself has a unique characteristic, its display is strictly random.
While this is a rather over-simplified derivation of the Seventh Parameter, it may be
sufficient to guide thinking in the direction of its appreciation, and as has been said
previously, this appreciation is purely personal.
In all previous applications of the Quadrature Concept by Awareness, the matter of
choice did not arise as how the Concept was applied did not make any difference.
However, with the application of the Quadrature Concept to the magnetic Field, this is
no longer the case, and a condition of asymmetry has been introduced which makes it
necessary to decide how the Concept shall be applied. In fact, the application of the
Concept is in itself a definition of the Eighth parameter, which is that of Decision, or
Free Will.
The Ninth parameter, however, again establishes symmetry, and leads to a concept of
Sequence, or Order, or Specific Arrangement.
Up to the Eighth Parameter, Awareness was largely in the position of Observer, and
was unable to make any difference in the scheme of things in the Understanding of
what happened when the Quadrature Concept was successively applied to the Basic
Concept. Concept was successively applied the basic Concept. However, with the
Eighth Parameter, Awareness became part of the Scheme in that a difference could
result. It is at this level that Free Will is exercised, even though we may have many
ideas to the contrary, and it is through this characteristic that we are able to control at
least a part of this universe. Increased understanding will of course make possible
extension of control, to the extent that our Awareness actually does Understand.
There is a price tag on this control through Free Will, however, in that the next
application of the Quadrature Concept establishes a pattern which persists right
around the cycle, and sequences are established which are directly consequential of
the application of the Eighth Parameter.
In our relationship with the Universe we see all sorts of applications of the Control
Fabric, from Random, through Free Will and into Sequence, as well as all sorts of
combinations of them. Again, as was the case in the lower fabrics, each Parameter
includes the lower Parameters as well as extending the Concept to include a new one.
Therefore, it follows that all higher Parameters than the Eighth will be subject to
modification by Awareness, with proper Understanding. The modification will be the
consequence of the operation on the asymmetry of the Field Fabric, and its
consequences will be felt right up to the Twelfth Parameter.
 Chapter VI

The Percipitation Fabric

Once Awareness has understood through the application of the Quadrature Concept,
the establishment of the first nine Parameters, the further application of this Concept
yields three more Parameters which bring Matter and Energy as we know them into
being. Again, as in the Third or Control Fabric, we have no tools except our own
Awareness and understanding to follow through the evolvement of this Fabric. The
two higher Fabrics require much more sophisticated manipulations than our
mathematics are capable of to show the relationships existing between the lower
Parameters and Fabrics and the higher ones, and at our stage of evolvement we can
reach them only through personal mental activity aided by hints and direction from
others who have already passed this way.
The application of the Quadrature Concept to the Parameter of Sequence yields the
Tenth Parameter, Form. It was previously mentioned that there is a unique value
between zero and infinity called Unity where exactly half the Reality is "inside" and
half is "outside" While it is true for formal mathematics and may be so established, it
is also universally true outside of this discipline, that no amount of manipulation can
alter the value of unity and it always remains the fulcrum about which all other values
pivot, regardless of scale. The Tenth Parameter attaches a special significance to this
value in that it becomes the apparent boundary of Reality.
It is at once apparent that there is no prescription of any "absolute" quantity of
Reality, or any scale of dimensions at all in this derivation. Therefore it follows that
any and all Reality will manifest Form such that its apparent boundary will manifest
half of the Reality inside and half outside. We do not know, and may never know, the
total amount of Reality in the Universe, but the Form of the Universe will be such that
half the Reality is inside and half outside. At the other extreme, the smallest bit of
Reality that we can discern will also have this characteristic of one half being inside
and the other half outside.
The next application of the Quadrature Concept yields the Parameter of Multiplicity,
where more than one Form is established. Remembering that each Parameter contains
within itself all lower Parameters, any and all deviations will reflect in the higher
parameters and the Eleventh Parameter will allow individualization in Form as a
consequence. This may not be at once obvious, but it is the mechanism by which the
various bits and pieces of matter and energy came into being, actually a coagulation
of substance out of the basic Reality.
When the Quadrature Concept is again applied there results the Parameter of
Aggregation, or Assembly of bits into a Purposeful Structure. In this region resides
the recognizable universe, animate and inanimate. It is the degree of exercise of Free
Will that distinguishes between these two realms.
Further application of the Quadrature Concept merely offsets the universe from itself,
which is the same as another linear dimension or First Parameter and the system
closes on itself. Therefore, within the Universe as we are aware of it there are only
these Twelve Parameters. They are the necessary and sufficient conditions for our
Universe as we know it, and all of which we are aware can be defined in terms of
these Parameters, and it is the duty and responsibility of Science to do so.
Having established twelve Parameters through our Awareness observing the Basic
Reality through the Quadrature Concept, the question naturally arises regarding the
place of Awareness in the Universe. Since none of the Parameters in any way
establishes Awareness, yet Awareness observes all twelve, it must occupy some
unique position relative thereto. This is true, but its understanding is not aided by the
Reality of the universe and again it becomes a personal matter.
The following analogy may assist in visualizing to some extent the relative structure
of the universal parameters and Awareness. Consider a sphere which is completely
surrounded by twelve other spheres of the same size. All the spheres are in contact,
and all the outer spheres are in contact with the inner. Only three spheres and the
inner sphere can have mutual contact under any one circumstance. Radius of these
three spheres may be mutually at right angles and the radius of the inner sphere may
be in line with any one of these. Depending on the starting point and progression, all
spheres may be inspected sequentially, without any preference. A quadrature
relationship is possible between any three spheres, including the central one. All these
relationships are valid with respect to the relationships existing among the twelve
parameters and Awareness.
 Chapter VII

The Basic Particle

Establishing the Twelve Parameters of the Universe, in their four Fabrics of Three
Parameters each, makes it possible to study from the point of view of the Creator the
evolution of the basic building blocks out of which our Universe is constructed.
Considering the evolution of one particle only we need go no higher than the first
seven parameters, actually holding the seventh constant. The higher Parameters enter
the scene only when we want to do something with the particle so established.
The first three Parameters set up a framework in space within which the particle will
appear, and the next three will provide the wherewithal with which to make it. We can
work with Length, Area and Volume, Tempic, Electric and Magnetic Fields, and all
needed relationships between them. Our result will of course not be a true particle,
because the higher Parameters will not have been applied; for example, it will not
display Form, but will be diffuse from zero to infinity.
In the establishment of the Space Fabric the repeated application of the Quadrature
Concept stepped up the available dimensions to three but it also made possible all
sorts of quadrature relationships within this framework. Similarly, in the
establishment of the Field Fabric three field regions were established with quadrature
relationships between them. Furthermore, there exists complete quadrature freedom
between the field and space fabric, so that in effect we work in a Six Dimensional
Continuum. It is easy to appreciate the large number of possibilities among the many
permutations and combinations of spatial dimensions and fields, but the real problem
is to sort out the actuality from the possibility. This can be done only by continual
cross-reference to observation of Reality; i.e., by asking Mother Nature the right
questions. We can be reasonably certain, however, of one thing: there will not be any
unused Parameters, and the final result of the studies will involve all six.
Since we have no senses by which we can become directly aware of the various fields
we will have to depend on the second hand data made available through our
instruments, and here we must be extremely careful to distinguish between the
phenomenon itself and the effects of the phenomenon on the instruments. Also, we
must be particularly careful in posing our questions to nature that they ask exactly
what we want to find out and are not ambiguous.
In developing the twelve Parameters, the Quadrature Concept was applied between
Awareness and the next lower Parameter, but it may also be applied between any
aspects of any Parameters, or any derivatives of them. In doing this, however, it is
most necessary to realize just what is being done, and to understand the relationships
which are involved. Furthermore, we must never forget that we are dealing with
Reality, and even though certain aspects may become zero, the Reality never
vanishes. Conversely, any aspect which extends to infinity is still reality.
Since it was established that reality does extend in all cases from zero to infinity, it
follows that if there is to be particularization as made possible by the eleventh
Parameter there must be "overlap" among certain aspects. This simply means that in
the field fabric it is possible to have fields that exist independently amongst
themselves and independently of any "background" which may also exist. In fact, we
do not know directly at present how much "unpercipitated Reality" there is in the
universe, which will of course appear as a uniform background to the precipitated
Reality with which we exist.
Whether or not fields stick together and add up to a single field depends entirely on
the antecedents of the field. If the fields are of unit particles they will become
coherent for more than half of the reality to be held in common, when the little bits
combine to form a big bit. If a field is produced by the simultaneous behavior of lots
of particles or other fields, then it will be coherent, so long as more than half its
reality exists in common. These are basic principles and form the subject matter of a
series of interesting and enlightening experiments, and when understood provides an
elegant interpretation of much data being pondered by students of these matters.
The transition between coherent and incoherent fields results from conditions which
bring more or less than half of the reality in common, and the 'stability" is purely a
function of how close to "half" the system actually is.
In manipulating fields and applying the Quadrature Concept between them, we must
understand that what we are really doing is allowing one field to operate on another.
The operation of A on b is not necessarily the same as the operation of B on A,
although there can be relationships between these two operations. Successive
operations will go right around the circle and back to the starting point provided
certain conditions are met. These conditions will become apparent later.
There is basically no difference between particles and radiated energy, except one of
structure and configuration. Both contain Reality and are made up of fields in space,
and are subject to the higher Parameters. We can say that radiated energy is
"extended" and that matter is "reentrant", to describe loosely their configurations and
structures.
With the foregoing in mind we can now explore what happens when the various fields
are operated upon by each other. When an electric field is operated upon by a tempic
field, i.e., changed, a magnetic field results. When a magnetic field is operated upon
by a tempic field, i.e., changed, an electric field results. A tempic field should result
when an electric field operates on a magnetic field, but the trick is to make it do so.
Also, we would like to know what happens when a tempic field is operated upon by
an electric field or a magnetic field.
A tempic field is largely amorphous and has direction only in relation to its own
gradient in space, while both the electric and magnetic fields have vectorial aspects in
addition to their scalar aspects. Therefore, we could hardly expect complete symmetry
among the operations of these three fields. We can, however, work through an
intermediate arrangement whereby we generate the desired field with its interaction
already built into it. Whether or not there is a limit to this sort of operation we do not
know, but it certainly hasn't been found yet, and it is a valid approach so long as we
keep the basic rules constantly in mind.
As an introductory exercise consider the operation of a tempic field on an electric
field by the simple expedient of having the electric field move. A magnetic field will
be produced and will have a certain specific orientation. The vectorial direction of the
magnetic field will be mutually at right angles to the direction of the electric field and
its motion. Now, since the magnetic field is a curl function its divergence over the
entire field must be zero. In order to bring this about the magnetic field must operate
on either or both if the other fields to close the system somehow, somewhere. One
such method would be for this operation to increase the tempic field on one side and
decrease it on the other so that the motion would close into a loop, which implies the
operation of the magnetic field on the electric field to produce a tempic field. If the
structure of the three fields is understood, the validity of this operation is at once
apparent, which establishes another principle; namely, that when a magnetic field,
produced by a moving electric field, is moved longitudinally a tempic field is
produced.
More thinking about this exercise discloses the fact that if this system merely closes
on itself, the divergence, which is the electric field is eliminated, so that the only way
in which the system can be self-sustaining is for it to close toroidally, so that there
will be components of all three fields in all directions. That this is in fact the model of
the basic particle of the universe in which we exist is amply borne out by experiment,
because it displays a tempic field, an electric field, and a magnetic moment. The
electric polarity depends on whether the spiral is right- or left-handed.
Inspection of this model discloses the fact that the tempic field will drop off as the
inverse distance from the center of the toroid, the electric field will drop off as the
inverse square of this distance, and the magnetic field will drop of as the inverse cube.
What fields we observe with our instrumentation in the vicinity of such a particle will
be the summation of the particle fields, the fields of all other particles, and the
unresolved background fields of the fabric itself.
Possibly a clearer understanding of the structure of the basic particle may be had by
considering the composition, orientation, and interaction of the entire field structure,
considered together as a unit.
Looking at the composite field structure shows us three fields at right angles to each
other. There is the tempic with its gradient in one direction, the electric with its
divergence in a direction at right angles to it and including it, and the magnetic at
right angles to the other two and including both of them. For self-sustaining
conditions, the operation f each upon the other, there must be one-for-one
relationships between them. Therefore the real movement under stable self-sustaining
conditions will be in the vectorial 1,1,1 direction, or exactly midway among the three
directions of the component fields.
The skew progression of the fields results in a double closure of the system, which
will have both rotation and precession. It is readily apparent that since the tempic field
only must have a specified gradient, the other two fields have two possible
orientations, which will result in two directions of possible rotation and two directions
of possible precession. The electric polarity of the particle will be the resultant of the
coherent fields arising from both the rotation and precession, and can have two values
of positive and two values of negative. Because of the necessary geometrical
conditions imposed by the nature of space itself, the precessional field will be smaller
than the rotational field giving particles having two values of positive charge rather
close together and two negative equally close together.
The significance of these differences in charges will be discussed later in the chapter
on gravity, as well as some very interesting circumstances arising out of the skew
condition, particularly at close range.
 Chapter VIII

Radiated Energy
The basic tempic particle rsulted from the operation of the tempic field on the electric
field through movement. In other words, there was a permitted gradient of tempic
field in space. If, however, we had insisted that the change be such that it occurred at
one place we would have had a slightly different picture. The only change possible
under these conditions would have been an increase or decrease in the electric field
through the operation of the tempic field, and it would have had to inject its own
quadrature relationship in order to exist. Therefore, the tempic field must in itself
carry the quadrature concept, which simply means that it becomes a sinusoidally
varying alternating field in the single space location.
Now, if the tempic field varies at any point in space, adjacent to that point there must
be tempic field gradients, or "velocities". Since the electric field has a definite
orientation, and consequently the magnetic field resulting from the tempic field
operation will also have a definite orientation, it will in turn produce a further tempic
field of definite orientation which will be coherent with the original field, increasing it
in one direction and reducing it in the other direction. The whole business can
therefore become self-sustaining only if it darts off in this particular direction with the
velocity of light, or in the direction of the establishing tempic field gradient.
It is readily apparent that we cannot avoid space getting into the picture in some way
or other. If we permit things to travel through space, they just go round and round and
stay in one place, but if we try to make them stay in one place they dart of with the
velocity of light! Furthermore, the difference between matter and radiated energy is
very similar to that between Direct Current and Alternating Current. Otherwise, there
is very little difference between the two forms of the expression of Reality.
As coherence is possible among particles, if more than half the reality is common, so
is coherence possible in radiated energy if more than half the reality is in common.
The extent to which the tempic field makes use of the quadrature concept in its
operation will reflect in the "wave length" of the radiation, which in turn will reflect
the quantity of reality involved. The maximum values of the electric and magnetic
fields will be those existing in the region where the radiated energy originated, since
there is no concept in this universe for Negative Reality, and the operations must be
on the total coherent fields present. This same reasoning applies to the size and
maximum fields of the basic particle.
It follows that where radiated energy originates in fabrics having appreciably different
background fields, its wavelength will be different from that of equivalent radiated
energy originating in more familiar fabric.
Within the universe which we perceive, we are reasonably satisfied that the maximum
value of all the coherent fields involved in our particles and radiated energy have the
same value. Planck's Constant is the numerical expression of this value, and the
velocity of light is the expression of the numerical value of the tempic field intensity
Whether or not other universes can and do exist having other numerical values, and
what the relationships ought to be between them, is quite another matter, subject to
entirely separate consideration.
In the previous consideration the operation of the tempic field on the electric field was
proposed as the starting point. If, however, the initial operation was on the magnetic
field, an additional complication gets injected. The electric field so generated can
have its required divergence only if the whole systemis folded back on itself. This
establishes a condition where the magnetic field is entirely closed on itself about a
tempic field "core", with the electric field interlaced with alternating polarity.
Picturesquely, it would look like a string of magnetic doughnuts of alternating
magnetic direction, stuck together with electrostatic icing of alternating polarity, and
all threaded into a string of increased tempic field and placed inside a tube of
decreased tempic field. A most complicated picture, but one which does exist in this
universe and has some most remarkable properties. For lack of a better name it is
called "tensor energy".
Tensor energy carries its tempic field with it, so it is therefore not subject to
propagation, and both ends of the beam are actually simultaneous (interval zero). The
beam does not dissipate and has the same numerical values at the receiving end as it
has at the transmitting end. Regardless of the combination of field conditions
encountered at the receiving end, the same relationships are maintained as existed at
the transmitting end. Reversing the initial polarity of the magnetic field will place
decreased tempic field on the inside and increased on the outside, so that several
tensor beams can be stuck together as a "cable". Since the tensor beam does not have
any external field of any kind it is immune to any and all outside field effects. The
only manifestation external to the beam itself is the tempic field gradient of the outer
sheath.
 Chapter IX

Building Blocks of Matter

When the basic particle was developed it was tacitly stated that only the first six
parameters would be considered. However, during the development there were many
instances when the higher Parameters were invoked, particularly those of the Fourth
Fabric, so that not only could the particle itself be visualized but some idea might
evolve a to how it might be related to other particles. When all the parameters have
been applied there exists a particle, having form, along with many others of its kind,
and having certain definite relationships to them, and possible of combination with
others to form purposeful aggregates.
Two particles will merge into a single particle if they can be so arranged that more
than half the reality is in common. Since the basic particle is shaped like a toroid,
stacking them is rather obviously the way to achieve this. We can put them together
alternately with opposite polarities until we reach a point where this basic condition
no longer holds. Remembering that the tempic field is an inverse distance field, the
electric is an inverse square field, and the magnetic is an inverse cube field, the
coherence of the various fields will be different, and there will be reached limits
beyond which the system will not be stable with simple stacking. We can then stick
the stacks together sideways, and then stick another stack on the ends of the resulting
assembly, and so on.
Electrons and positrons as we know them are basic particles, and protons and neutrons
are simply stacks of these with either an even or odd number in the stack. Mesons are
merely fragmented stacks. There are quite a variety of other bits and pieces made up
of basic particles stuck together through their field coherence, with varying degrees of
stability being displayed according to how close to the half-in-half-out rule they are.
Since it is rather obvious that no pattern of stacking can ever make all the fields
involved equally interpenetrating, there must be some pattern of leftover fields
manifesting outside the composite particle, and these are the fields which establish the
characteristics of matter as we know it. Study of the relative configurations of the
electric and magnetic fields establishes the electric charge and the configuration of the
family of basic particles which the composite particle attracts. The electrons will drift
into the electric field and then attach themselves over appropriate poles, to an extent
that interpenetration can be established between electron fields and the residual fields
of the composite particle. The number of poles and the number of unit charges
determine the "elements" as we identify these systems.
The tempic field, being purely scalar in nature merely contributes to the manner in
which changes can occur in the system. If, however, through some characteristic of
configuration, the tempic field within a composite particle displays some irregularity,
this will manifest as a "vibration", and if the magnitude of the vibration is such as to
cause the interpenetrating fields to exceed the half-and-half point the whole system
will come apart: radioactivity.
When a system does come apart, those fields which were coherent and
interpenetrating in the correct proportion will remain so and take off down the tempic
field gradient and become radiated energy.
The fields which contribute to the internal "attractions" of atoms are the electric and
magnetic, supplemented by secondary fields resulting from any further operations
between the basic field parameters. These fields form a static pattern, which is
dynamic only when tempic field irregularities occur. The difference in energy levels
is the extent to which the fields are coherent in the proportions to form radiated
energy, which can enter or leave the system upon appropriate arrangement of its
components.
At this point it may be well to call attention to a simple but often overlooked
principle. Since all Reality in this universe must conform to the parameter of Form, it
must always display the characteristic of being half-in and half-out. This rule also
applies to energy, either quantized or amorphous. Energy always exists in conjunction
with its conjugate. In other words, in any reaction involving energy, we see only one
half the energy involved; the other half is either inside or outside from our point of
concern. It is most fortunate that this is so, otherwise the universe wouldn't work!
In developing our understanding of radiated energy we made certain initial
assumptions, i.e., that we hid have a field upon which we could operate, and that this
field was sufficiently detached that the operation was so isolated that it could be
considered quite apart from any interaction with other fields or particles. Rather
obviously this does not represent a real condition. In nature we always find a close
association between matter and energy somewhere in the scheme of things, and
usually at both ends of the syste, sowe should have a closer look at the interaction of
matter and energy, always bearing in mind that they are both different aspects of the
same Reality.
The reason that fields curl around to form material particles is because tempic fields
are generated which increase the time available on one side of the system and
decrease it on the other. Therefore, whenever any degree of asymmetry is introduced
into a coherent field system, it will change direction and if the conditions are right for
the system to be self-sustaining, a particle will be formed. Conversely, if a
discontinuity is introduced, sufficient to disturb the closure of a system, the
differences in the tempic field distribution will disappear and the particle will dart off
as radiated energy.
When particles merge to such an extent that the interpenetration of the fields exceeds
the halfway point, and an asymetry is introduced, a tempic field gradient is
established away from the system in the direction bisecting the asymmetry, in both
directions so that two bits of radiated energy take off down these gradients.
Conversely, when two approximately equal bits of radiated energy merge beyond the
halfway point, a deviation in direction of the tempic field takes place which, if it can
be maintained, allows the bits of radiated energy to merge into a particle.
Within a complex structure of particles there may be coherent field systems, which if
disturbed may acquire a linear tempic field gradient, and a bit of the Reality will take
off down this gradient and radiation will be emitted by the structure.
With the curling in on itself of radiated energy, if the geometry is correct, the
alternating field aspects flow into a uni-directional arrangement, and conversely,
when a particle unwraps to form radiation, a quadrature phase is introduced in the
field relationships.
With an understanding of the basic particle, the structure of radiated energy, and the
transition mechanism, we do in fact have the understanding of how this universe is
put together and how it operates. Using the principles already understood we can
explore all the many and varied manifestations of matter and energy, and understand
just what goes on. Here and there we can confirm our understanding by reference to
experiment, in the full knowledge that we will pose our questions correctly, and that
nature will give us explicit answers.
 Chapter X

Forces
In the evolution of the twelve Parameters of the Universe by the Quadrature Concept
on the Basic Concept in Nothing-At-All, such questions as the forces involved and the
energy which became apparent did not arise. These matters come into beings only
when the twelve Parameters have been established, and we find that what goes on in
this universe requires some understanding of these factors.
A field is a region which has a unique characteristic. The unique characteristics of
fields were established by the operation of the Quadrature Concept on the Space
Fabric and then in turn on the fields as each was established. In the earlier stages of
this development, before the application of the parameters higher than the Sixth, we
could not discern the presence of these factors in the amorphous background of the
field and space fabrics; only the Reality which had been established.
Subsequent applications of the Quadrature Concept provided Control and
Percipitation, but none of the Fabrics added anything beyond what existed in Nothing-
At-All as perceived by Awareness, and all Reality which existed or can exist was
provided by the Creator in that original state. Awareness merely established how it
was arranged to establish the universe as we know it.
We generally think of a Force as something which pulls or pushes against some sort
of resistance, and as such have a pretty fair, but superficial, idea of what it is. In the
establishment of the Space Fabric, Force is what stretched a Point into a Line and kept
it there, and what pulled a line out sideways to make an area and held it there, and
what pushed the area apart into a volume and sustained it. Force provided the means
by which the density of Reality in Space was adjusted to form the Tempic Field, and
the means by which the Tempic Field was given a Divergence to establish the Electric
Field and the means by which the Electric Field was given a Curl to establish the
Magnetic Field, and the means by which these fields were sustained.
Force, in turn establishes the parameters of the Control Fabric and the Percipitation
Fabric, and makes possible the establishment of Matter and Energy as we know them.
In other words, each operation with the Quadrature Concept involves a Force
arrangement, and the magnitude and significance of each of the Forces depends on the
manipulation carried out and the Fabric in which it is being done. Conversely, forces
always develop whenever Reality is modified, and always in the Fabric where the
modification takes place. It takes the combined manipulation of all three Parameters
in any one Fabric to extend a force into another Fabric, which, needless to say, is a
rather special arrangement.
We say that Energy is the ability to do work, or the ability to establish a force which
will operate against a resistance over a certain prescribed distance, but these ideas are
not quite basic enough to relate Force with the basic Reality. Looking at a region of
unit size in which there is a field, we note that this field came into being because of
the Quadrature Concept, a Force, and is being sustained by this Force. The Unique
Characteristic which describes this field says that there is s difference between
opposite sides of the unit region, in the direction of the field and therefore the field
must be stressed against itself in this direction and therefore the Reality so expressed
is the product of the field intensity with itself, and the total Reality within the total
field will be the integrated value of this "Field Intensity Squared" over the entire
space occupied by the field, bearing in mind the half-in-half-out relationship of Form.
Or we can concern ourselves with the Reality or Energy within a limited region only
and perform the integration over that region. There is a very interesting factor which
enters the picture at this point called the Principle of Inversion.
If a region is selected in which there are two fields of the same kind, same magnitude
and same direction, such that very nearly half the Reality of each is within the region,
then the two fields are just on the edge of becoming coherent. If the fields are not
coherent the total energy in the region is the sum of the energies of the two fields, i.e.,
twice the square of the field intensity of each integrated over the region. If, however,
the fields are coherent, the total energy is the square of twice the field intensity
integrated over the region, or twice the energy of the two fields incoherent! This
relationship is most significant as it represents the "packing energy" of the bits and
pieces in atomic nuclei, and also points the way to the precipitation of energy out of
the cosmic background.
When we take a look at the mechanics of matter we find some interesting
relationships. Kinetic energy, or energy of change, is one half the mass times the
velocity squared. But the velocity is the reciprocal of the gradient of reality or the
tempic field, from which it appears that the energy is one half the mass times the
tempic field intensity squared, integrated over the region involved in the change. If
the mass is taken as the density of reality times the volume it occupies the fact that
twice as much energy appears indicates that the fields making up matter are coherent.
This again is an important relationship as it pertains to the chopping up of matter.
 Chapter XI

Gravity
The twelve Parameters of the Universe are the necessary and sufficient conditions for
the establishment of our Universe as we know it, and together with the unique
position of Awareness forms our entire experience in this physical world. All of
which we are or can be aware are expressable in terms of these twelve Parameters.
Gravity is a phenomenon with which we have daily experience but which we haven't
earned very much about, working backwards as we do from effect to cause. The fact
that objects fall when given an opportunity to do so, experiencing an acceleration
which appears to have very nearly the same value on this planet for all falls, leads us
to the conclusion that it is somehow an inertial phenomenon. The added fact that
ordinary manipulations appear not to affect gravity leads to the conclusion that
somehow gravity is inherent in matter itself. By studying the effects of gravity and
keeping close track of the numerical quantities involved we have established some
rules respecting forces, energy and interactions, all of which allow us to work with
gravity as we find it, but there it stops.
Since matter and energy are manifestations of Reality entirely within the Twelve
parameters, we must look for explanations of their behavior within the structure of
these parameters, and regardless of any ideas to the contrary this is where we will find
it!
The field fabric sets up three, and three only, fields which are capable of exercising
forces on the field structures which constitute matter and energy, so gravity must be
due to the operation of one or more of these three fields. The fact that observation
indicates that gravity falls off as the inverse square of the distance indicates that it is
essentially an electric field, divergence. The fact that we cannot cancel it out by the
application of the electric fields to which we have access is due to the fact that we
cannot make the canceling field coherent, and the best we can do is to integrate the
effects of the fields, not the fields themselves, to produce an opposing force in a
limited region.
The inertial approach involves the application of a particular tempic field gradient,
carefully adjusted so that its effects are consistent with observation, but this implies
certain flexibilities in the space fabric inconsistent with its established linear nature.
Another inertial concept of gravity is the all-pervading micro-particular gas, the units
of which impinge on matter and through an exchange of momentum press the matter
together. The difficulty of this concept is the necessity for explaining the inflow of
energy to matter and implies either an energy sink within matter or an obscure energy
exchange phenomenon between the regions within and without matter.
When the basic particle was being considered, it was established that four kinds of
particles were possible: right hand and left hand spin and right hand and left hand
precession, which gave particles having positive charges with plus and minus
increments, but all having the same magnetic moments and tempic fields. Within
these particles, and within systems made up of them as atoms, etc., there is field
coherence, so that there are specific values for these fields determined by the particles
themselves, and outside of them the fields will also be quite specific.
Looking at the model of the basic particle it is noted that the electric field is a
dynamic condition resulting from the mutual interaction of the three basic fields. But
since the tempic field is a gradient it is in itself not "motional", and the radial
component of the electric field being divergence and having no component along
either of the tempic field gradient directions also is not motional, and these fields are
essentially static so long as the particle itself doesn't move or change. However, the
skew component of the electric field, due to the precession, does have a component
along a tempic field gradient and is motional. Therefore, field coherence is possible
within the static structure due to spin, but not within the dynamic structure due to
precession, unless the configuration is such that the skew field can comply with the
half-and-half Form condition.
It is fairly obvious from the foregoing that only matter having the same direction of
precession will assemble into large aggregates, first, because of the selective action of
the differences in forces resulting from the differences in electric charges, and second,
because the interpenetration of particles of opposite precession will introduce an
asymmetry in the system resulting in its immediate conversion into radiated energy.
There are, however, a few special configurations where fairly large aggregates are
involved where the initial fields already had an asymmetry which could be offset by
the asymmetry introduced by the particle with the reversed precession and the whole
system may be stable. Consequently, in the evolution of our universe we would
expect a separation process to take place which would result in matter of essentially
the same precession congregating together, and a fairly quick conversion to radiated
energy of particles of opposite precession which happened to wander into such
regions.
In considering the integration of basic particles to form the larger units of matter,
there is a slight advantage for the particles with the larger total electric charge to so
integrate, because suitable configurations will permit coherence of the skew fields. In
any aggregate system such as a planet, there is bound to be a continual circulation of
particles, both basic and composite, so that after many cycles of such circulation most
of the big ones congregate in the nuclei and the little ones take up outer positions.
This is the condition which we find now, as we inspect the matter to which we have
access.
When the forementioned separation has taken place and most of the particles of
opposite precession have been eliminated, we find that the system contains nuclei
having one specific charge with electron shells having the opposite charge. The matter
on planet Earth has positive charges dominant in the nucleus and negative charges in
the shells, and as free particles. Elsewhere in the universe there will be an aggregate
of the converse relationship.
An aggregate of matter such as we have on Earth, where the sort-out is reasonably
complete, will be electrically neutral so far as the electric fields are concerned, and
may or may not have a magnetic moment depending on how random is the orientation
of the various particles, again determined by the summation of the effects of the
fields, and a tempic field which will be the direct scalar summation of the many
contributing tempic fields. It will also have the skew electric fields of the same
polarity as the nuclei.
With the exception of the skew fields, all the other external fields of the aggregate
may be considered as static because they have no component of the tempic field at
right angles to them. The skew fields, on the other hand, are dynamic because they do
have a quadrature tempic field component. Furthermore, the skew fields are largely
incoherent simply because the normal almost random orientation precludes their
meeting the half-in requirement of Form to become coherent.
Since the skew fields do have a tempic field component at right angles, they will
generate an electric field throughout the entire region, of the same polarity as the
static electric field to which they are additive. Such an aggregate may be considered
as having two electric fields, one of which is subject to cancellation by surrounding
electric particle fields, and the other not so subject. Partial cancellation is possible,
and if the aggregate is left to its own devices will be attained, by a surrounding shell
of particles of the opposite polarity, so that externally to the entire system the effects
of the fields will be a minimum and electrically neutral.
However, if another aggregate of similar precession enters the vicinity, such
cancellation can no longer be approximated, and the skew field induces an electric
field within this aggregate which amounts to an electric field distortion or
"polarization". A convenient way of discussing what happens is to consider the skew
fields and the polarization in terms of electric "charges" even though this concept is
not strictly correct.
If the primary aggregate is considered to have a charge which induces the polarization
in the secondary aggregate, this polarization will be equivalent to a charge
displacement such that the product of the displaced charges and the distance through
which they are displaced will be a statement of the amount of polarization This will
be located in the electric field of the primary aggregate and will have two forces
acting which will be numerically equal; one maintaining the polarization and the other
between the polarization and the primary field. Therefore, the net force will be the
product of the primary field divergence and the square of the polarization in the
secondary aggregate. There are of course other ways of establishing this relationship
but they all say the same thing in other words, which is that Gravity is a dynamic field
function and is the product of the gravitational field divergence and the square of the
polarization induced in the attracted bit of matter, with the gravitational field being
merely the skew electric field.
For the mathematician the following is offered:

Polarization in the attracted bit is q(q dr)

Equating forces q(q dr) = Qq/r2 + Qq/(r + dr)2
Gravity F= Qq/r2 + Qq/(r + dr)2 = (q dr)2 1/r
Having established the nature of Gravity and is "formula", we may now see what can
be done with it. Since it is essentially an electric field phenomenon, albeit not an
electrostatic one, its distribution and behavior will be much the same as any other
electric field, except for its dynamic characteristic. Altering the polarization will alter
the force exerted by gravity, but because this is a square relationship, no such
alteration can make the force negative (operate in the opposite direction). However,
altering the divergence will alter both the magnitude and direction of the force, and
the trick for controlling gravity is precisely this.
Since the gravitational field is due to the skew electric field, or stated differently, to
the induction from the motional electric field, this is the logical region to explore for
the mechanism by which fields may be produced to combine with the gravitational
field to produce a resultant having a divergence more to our liking.
In taking a quick look at the gravitational relationships of the basic particles alone
there are some interesting aspects. Since in an established region practically all the
precessions are the same, the free particles will have a motional field of polarity the
same as the particles making up the composite ones, and therefore they will be
"repelled" by gravity. This repulsion, however, will be quite a bit less than the
electrostatic attraction, so a compromise position will be established at such a distance
that everything will be in equilibrium.
In the atomic structure there are therefore the electric field forces holding the
electrons onto the nucleus, the magnetic forces fixing them in position, the
gravitational forces tending to push them away and resulting in a compromised
location, with the tempic field contributing to the dynamic conditions within and
contiguous to the structure. All these forces have been developed from the basic
concepts already put forward and are possible of confirmation by experiment if we
ask nature the right questions. These same forces extend beyond the atom into
molecular chemistry, crystal forms, and amorphous aggregates. These dame forces
exist within the atomic nuclei together with others resulting from the interpenetration
of the fields and their coherence. Matter, though magnificently complex is elegantly
simple in its basic structure when understood.
 Definition of Unusual Terms
Aggregate ~ The physical assembly of particles as separate units.
Amorphous ~ Assembly of matter in which control is largely random.
Awareness ~ The relationship between a Being and all else.
Coherence ~ The condition when two or more fields of the same king and direction
combine into a single field.
Creator ~ The primary Cause for the existence of Awareness, Reality and its
perception.
Crystal ~ Assembly of matter in which control is largely sequential.
Fabric ~ Grouping of three of the basic Parameters according to derivation and
contiguous characteristics.
Integration ~ The summation of bits of the same kind into a whole.
Parameter ~ One of the twelve basic principles upon which all Reality perceived by
Awareness is based.
Percipitation ~ Bringing Reality totally within the Perception of Awareness.
Personal ~ Pertaining to the identity of a Being.
Plasm ~ Assembly of matter in which control is largely free will.
Quadrature ~ A special operation by which a broadside (at right angles) relationship
is established.
Skew ~ The geometrical configuration in which certain fields have tangential as well
as radial components.
Tempic ~ The field parameter of Change
Tensor ~ Pertaining to a configuration of radiated energy which is self-contained.
 Section Two

The Q Concept
If we consider the fraction 2/3 we see that we are comparing the number 2 with the
number 3. Nothing is said about the reality to which each number applies, beyond the
implication that both numbers apply to the same reality. If, however, they do not
apply to the same reality, then one of two things result: i.e., a conversion must be
made or we agree that we cannot deal with the situation.
Suppose we are considering 2 apples and two pears. They are both fruit and have
many features in common. The fraction 2/3 tells us that of the 5 fruit, 2 are of one
kind and 3 are of another, and that we have 2/3 as many of one kind as we have of the
other, and 3/2 of the converse.
If we rewrite the fraction in the following form 2/3|5 this nomenclature will tell us all
of the above in one glance; namely, that we have 5 articles, having a factor in
common which we are comparing, and that we have 2 of one kind and 3 of the other.
Written 3/2|5 tells us precisely the same thing except that the order of comparison is
reversed.
If we write i2/j3|5 we realize at once that 2 somethings lie along the x axis and 3
somethings lie along the y axis, but that we are considering their numerical values
only.
If we write i2/j3|5 we realize that we are comparing two vectors in a quite normal
manner. In fact, we are so familiar with vectors that the mere presence of the i and j
notation tell us the whole story with respect to these two vectors. Therefore, the
vertical line and what is to the right of it may properly be omitted.
Consider next the problem of zero and infinity. If we define infinity as the largest
number in which we have any interest and zero as the smallest number in which we
have any interest, and if we maintain exactly the same degree of interesting both, then
unity must lie exactly halfway between our zero and infinity. We may tell this story in
our nomenclature as follows: 0/00|1 or 00/0|1.
Consider next the situation with respect to differentials. The quantity dy/dx implies
that there exists a relationship between y and x and that there are no aspects not
included in this relationship. If, however, there are unrelated aspects, then dy/dx
implies that only the related aspects are being considered. To a limited extent we get
around this difficulty by "conversion factors" or scale constants, but these means do
not allow us to cross the gap between one type of reality to a totally different type.
If we write sy/dx|A we are saying that A describes the relationship between y and x
which we are to consider. This relationship may be ANYTHING.
The foregoing, though interesting, is not essential to the handling of ordinary concepts
and their mathematics. However, there are certain transcendental concepts which do
not lend themselves to a mathematical analysis unless we use such devices to orient
them within the framework of the mathematics we have learned to understand.
We are all familiar (or think we are) with the term "NOW" meaning the present. We
speak of the past, present and future and consider "now" as the bracket in time with
which we are immediately concerned. However, no matter how precisely we define it
we cannot establish exactly what the present or now really is, except that it is vaguely
a dividing point between the past and the future. Nevertheless, we know quite well
instinctively that we are living in the present and it is a perfectly real and satisfactory
situation. Furthermore, we are advised that, to a disembodied entity, the present is the
complete reality and the past and future merely arrangements of events in the broadest
sense.
If we write Future - Past = Now, we are saying that "Now is a very small differential
between two very large items". A more proper expression is: Future - Past/Now|90°
where we show that the present is actually in quadrature with the Future-Past, and
hence need not be a small differential at all, but can assume the proportions which we
instinctively know it to possess.
If we use the symbol Q for this quadrature concept we can write the above as:
F - P| Q
N
which tells us the whole story regarding this relationship and leaves us satisfied that it
is all in the proper perspective.
We know that spin itself, the divergence of spin and the curl of spin are all mutually at
right angles. Therefore, any inter-comparison between the three fields presented by
these quantitites should properly be written with the Q concept included:
De/dm|Q dm/dt|Q dt/de|Q
Incidentally, our observation of these three fields is always in quadrature. This is quite
apparent with respect to time as set forth above, but a little consideration is necessary
to appreciate that it also applies to the other two basic fields as well. This concept is
even more necessary when learning to appreciate the higher dimension. Without it we
cannot deal mathematically with the relationship between fields and, say, free will.
Here it should be emphasized that the Q concept extends beyond mere quadrature, or
kind. It actually embraces the relationships existing among whole families of aspects
of reality.
Consider the twelve dimensions of Deity, oriented in four fabrics of three each.
Ordinarily one would not consider any dimensional relationship to exist, say, between
the electric field and probability, but these are truly related through the Q concept. In
fact, the Q concept is the only relationship which does in fact exist between the
various dimensions.
Again, we have defined a field as any region which has a unique characteristic. If we
extend our concept of a region to include the abstract as well as the spatial idea, then
all twelve of the dimensions become fields. Admitting this, the Q concept must exist
between the various dimensions incorporated in the analysis.
Let us look at an example:
is a valid equation only if both sides, and everything on each side, refer to the same
aspect of reality or a Unity relationship exists between all of the components. Note the
resemblance of this equation to certain electromagnetic wave equations, which are in
fact particular cases of this general case.
Employing the Q concept, this equation becomes
 Section Three

Principles & Technology of Other Races

[ Assembled from disclosures made by space people in various communications made
to W. B Smith, and others with whom contact has been established. Data is arranged
in logical rather than chronological order. ]

Part 1

Fundamentals
1.1 ~ The Structure of Meaning
Meaning is something which we generally take for granted. It is something with
which we live day by day and which we usually have no occasion to define. In fact, a
strict definition might be exceedingly difficult to evolve. To try to attach a meaning to
meaning is very much like trying to pull oneself up by one's bootstraps. We could say
that meaning is a way of conveying understanding, or that understanding results from
the successful of meaning. Understanding itself is something that begs definition.
Our knowledge of the physical world is acquired in two ways: by physical experience,
and by conveyance of meaning by others. In either case it can have two results. The
knowledge can simply be stored to be regurgitated on demand, or it can be
understood. There is a vast difference between these two aspects. In the first case the
action is much like a phonograph or the memory box in an electronic brain. The
stored data is usable only in the precise form in which it was deposited, any change
whatsoever being tantamount to error. In the second case, however, since the data is
understood, it can be used in any form whatsoever and in any combination with other
data which is understood.
Obviously, understanding is enormously more useful than mere memory storage.
Where memory bits can be used only one by one, or in combinations which have been
established in memory, understanding permits use in all sorts of permutations and
combinations: "The greatest wealth which can be acquired by man, is a complete
understanding" (A-lan).
An example may be used to illustrate these points. Of a blind person who has never
enjoyed the use of his eyes were handed a lemon and told that it was yellow, he could
feel its shape, texture, hardness and smell or taste it. Thereafter, if handed a similar
object he would be fairly capable of telling someone else that it was a lemon and that
it was yellow. However, he probably would have no understanding of yellow.
Three things are necessary to understanding, that is for data to have meaning. First,
the data must actually reach the recipient accurately, and this is not nearly as easy as it
looks. It must reach him either through his physical senses, or through direct mind
contact, both of which are subject to distortions. Second, the recipient must be coded
to receive the information. That is, each bit of information must be significant to him;
it must have its own meaning in its own right. Third, the recipient must be able to
process the data, which is the fitting of it together until it becomes an integrated
whole, which is meaningful and self-consistent. To these three major steps may be
added a fourth, which is essentially the cross-checking of meaning with others who
have been exposed to the same data.
There exist many aids to understanding, such as formal logic, mathematics,
computers, and methods of thinking which in themselves are close to intuition. In
what follows, use will be made of any and all aids to understanding. However, it
cannot be stressed too strongly that in nature there are certain fundamentals upon
which all else is predicated, and an understanding of the more complex cannot be
attained until the fundamentals are completely understood. And this does not mean
merely committing to memory certain formulas that appear to work.
When properly understood, this universe in which we find ourselves is beautifully
simple. It is not at all the mathematical monstrosity with which we are accustomed to
deal in our conventional science. True, the basic principles are foreign to our
scholastic training, but they are strictly ion accordance with what we know
instinctively to be true. We are actually born with a better understanding of our
universe than we boast of after a college graduation.
In formal geometry we base our reasoning on certain axioms, which we hold to be
self-evident truths. The fact that we can build an integrated, meaningful, and self-
consistent whole on these axioms gives us confidence in them. What would our
attitude be if we found that the farther we advanced in geometry the more corrections
we had to apply to make things come out right? We most certainly should question
the validity of our precious axioms, or our methods, or both.
In our conventional science we have assumed certain things to be self-evident, and we
have built a very complicated structure on them. We actually are finding, however,
that we have to apply more and more corrections to make our philosophy work. In
fact, we now apply so many corrections that we have formed the habit and consider
that to do so is perfectly natural and in the orderly course of events. We are so far
along this road that it is difficult even to look back, let alone to return to our axioms
for a reappraisal and maybe a fresh start.
In what follows a complete new start is attempted. No apology will be made for this
approach, and no explanations will be given beyond those believed to be necessary for
an understanding of the subject. As a matter of fact, a useful preliminary ceremony
would be a good brain washing. It should be remembered that no one can really teach;
they can only help others to learn.

1.2 ~ The Rectilinear Concept

As a first consideration let us consider what space appears to be to us. We have no
doubts about its volumetric nature although we have no senses by which we can
observe this condition. We conclude that space is volumetric by the nature of things
which we find in it. What would it be like if everything were removed from space?
Would we even have space?
Can we conceive of a space structure completely devoid of matter or energy in any
form; real empty space? What would such space be like? If we were disembodied
entities located in such a space, how could we identify our position or describe where
or how we were? What sort of yardstick could we use? These and many more similar
questions must be faced squarely by those seeking understanding.
When one has satisfied himself by actually doing it that he can conceive of space with
absolutely nothing in it, and is not too terrified of his creation, he is then in a position
to take the next step, namely to find his way about in it.
An arbitrary decision can be made to refer all concepts to where the investigator
conceives himself to be, thereby establishing a point. He can next conceive of an
adjacent point, thereby establishing a line. By turning in various directions he can
establish the concepts of surfaces and volumes. But no matter what he does after that,
the investigator cannot add more concepts to the space itself. He therefore concludes
that what he instinctively felt soon after he first conceived the empty space, that it was
volumetric, and nothing more, is correct.
The foregoing is actually an exercise in mental gymnastics, but as physical exercise is
necessary for body-building, so are these exercises necessary for the building of
understanding. It is absolutely necessary to satisfy oneself on these points before
going on to the next concept.
The next step is to conceive of a way of getting about in this empty space, and to
realize that one has done so when the operation is complete. The concept of an
adjacent position, or point, is a good approach, and here again the operation becomes
one of mental gymnastics, and a lot of manipulation and practice is necessary to get
the feel of the situation.
As one gains in understanding of the properties of space, the various geometries
become evident, and it becomes increasingly obvious that a wide variety can be made
to work, if certain basic parameters are admitted. However, since our concern is
primarily with our space and our universe, we will want to select the geometry that
best fits our experience.
Ordinary Euclidean or rectilinear geometry is quite familiar and comprehensible to us,
and we can understand easily how it can be applied to space as we conceive it. We
can understand a sideways, forwards-backwards, up-down concept, or expressed
mathematically, and x, y and z axis. Also, we experience no great difficulty in
conceiving of these three axes as converging at right angles to a single point and
extending outward therefrom to enormous distances. We can even introduce the idea
of infinity in any direction as being somewhat beyond the farthest distance in which
we have any interest.
In our rectilinear concept we can conceive of such a thing as a straight line, although
we might be hard put to define it, since the concept is in itself axiomatic. However, if
we understand what a straight line actually is in our concept and we are sure that
others with whom we communicate also have the same understanding, we can use it
as a real datum point in our appreciation of our universe. This point is of particular
significance in what is to follow, as it is one of the few solid anchors we have on
which to fasten our understanding. Let us never lose sight of this concept of a straight
line, as entirely distinct from the behavior of matter or energy.
Our rectilinear concept at once validates our Euclidean geometry. Furthermore, it
removes any limitations which might be imposed on it by either great or small
distances. It provides us with a clear-cut framework within which we can think our
way about in space. We should satisfy ourselves that this concept actually is a
necessary and sufficient condition for this purpose, although we remember that its
selection was arbitrary and that other geometries probably would work just as well.
However, since we have made our decision to use the rectilinear concept, we must be
prepared to stick to our decision unless and until proved wrong. As a matter of fact,
any geometry can be used, and will work within the limiting parameters of its
definitions. It is only when extended beyond these limits that corrections become
necessary, but even with the corrections the geometry itself does not become invalid,
only the things we expect it to do.

1.3 ~ Relativity of Measurement

In our concept of space one of our first needs is for methods of measurement. We
want to fix distances and directions, and we want to be sure that what we measure
stays measured at the value we measure. We can agree upon some arbitrary distance
between two points of which we can conceive, and make our measurements in terms
of this distance as a unit, or standard, if you please. But can we be sure that the two
points which form our standard stay put? And would it actually make any difference if
they didn't? Is there any characteristic of our space which would tell us if our standard
changed? As a matter of fact, if there were, such a property itself would make an
excellent standard. We are forced to the conclusion that, (a) absolute distances in
space as determined by properties of space cannot exist, all measurements being
relative to some arbitrary standard, and (b) so long as ALL the measurements in
which we are interested are made relative to the same arbitrary standard, it doesn't
matter if they do change, as we have no way of knowing anyway.
To get ahead of ourselves a bit, we might discuss the use of the so-called constant
quantity, the velocity of light, as a standard of distance. This implies two assumptions:
(a) that some quantity, time, is fixed somehow so that a measurement can be made
relative to it, and (b) that we can be sure that light will behave in a ladylike manner
with respect to our rectilinear geometry. At first this may seem to be an attractive way
out, but a little consideration will show that it merely trades one difficult problem for
two more which are inherently just as difficult. These maters will form the subject of
a later section where it will be shown that the problem is even more complex than
appears above. Fortunately, there is a solution which is at once simple and satisfying,
but a good deal of preliminary conditioning must be endured before this concept can
be understood.

1.4 ~ Basic Reality

Having conceived of completely empty space and satisfied ourselves regarding the
geometry of it and the limitations of measurement which are inherent in it, we may
quite properly ask ourselves, how real it is it? Does our space, the space which
surrounds us, actually have these characteristics? We know that our space contains
lots of things we consider as quit real, and we may ask of what are they made, and
what is their basic reality?
To conceive of an abstract quality and assign to it concrete properties and then call it a
real substance is most unsatisfactory in the face of our notions regarding everyday
matter. We would much prefer to have something more tangible as a starting point.
Consequently, even though reality actually is a concept just as intangible as our
rectilinear concept, it might assist understanding if some primordial quantity could be
introduced as a medium of expression. The early postulation of ether and the still
earlier Greek Ylm might fulfill this requirement. Both were considered to be all-
pervading strictly continuous substances out of which matter was fabricated, and to
have whatever properties were necessary for the formation of matter, without regard
to how conflicting these properties might be. There is no fundamental objection to the
use of such a medium of expression, since we will find that all references to it actually
cancel out anyway. However, if it will serve as a crutch to help us in our first faltering
steps, by all mean let's use it.
In our considerations of Ylm or ether we have something that is structureless,
imponderable, and without boundaries, and in every sense intangible. Our concept of
space provides a place in which we can conceive of the ether as being located, but by
what manipulation can we convert this imponderable substance into ponderable
matter?
Instinctively we know that we must make use of space as we have it, and that which
we find therein, if we are to designate reality as distinct from the continuous
background of ether. If we cannot designate some portion of the ether as being unique
and distinguishable from all the rest, then we cannot say that we have established any
degree of reality.
What is required then is for us to conceive of something which may be done, some
manipulation which when completed will designate without uncertainty a certain
region as being unique above all others, and therefore real. Ordinary spatial
measurement we know to be inadequate since they are all relative to the arbitrary
standard with which they were measured. Obviously what is needed is something
which in itself is absolute: something that will display the same value no matter where
or how it is inspected, something against which a measurement may be made with
assurance that when made it will not change. Furthermore, to assume the arbitrary
injection of such a standard merely begs the question, since we transfer the question
of reality from the substance to the yardstick that measured it, without yet establishing
the reality of the yardstick. No, we must find that for which we seek in our concept of
space itself.

1.5 ~ The Concept of Spin

There is one, and only one, concept that is absolute in its own right in rectilinear
space, and that is the concept of spin. The word should be understood in the sense of a
manipulation, or process, performed within the concept of space as we have
conceived it, or performed on the ether within it. Either approach is valid.
Imagine two points in rectilinear space, with a straight line joining them. Imagine that
another line which started out coincident with the first is swung around one of the
points until it is again coincident with its initial position. Something has been done,
once, and the concept of it having been done is established. No matter how big or
small our region may become relative to some yardstick, the rotation once around
remains the same. So also are absolute, multiple and factional rotations.
It is at once apparent that this concept of spin, extended through a place rotating about
a line, and extending to infinity can be made to encompass our entire concept of
rectilinear space. We can fill all space with a single spin, or any portion thereof, or we
can fill it with many spins. Furthermore, we can conceive of the many spins being
oriented in many ways, and having many manners of distribution. But the important
thing to understand is that a region which is spinning is distinguishable from regions
which are not, and that the actual spin is independent of any arbitrary standard of
measurement.
At this point it must be noted that nothing is said about the rate of spin; only that spin
takes place. Earlier we toyed with a concept of time which we held in abeyance
because the concept added nothing to our concept of space and only posed more
problems than it solves. We do not need to introduce time so long as we recognize the
intervals of spin; that is, the relative angles of displacement at each comparative
measurement. Understanding this point is vital to an understanding of spin. It will be
shown later that time is a consequence of spin, and not something by which spin may
be measured.
Having established the absolute nature of spin we may next question its reality. By
reality, we understand the ability to distinguish the reality from all else, to be able to
say what it is and what it is not, to say where it is and where it is not, to make it
interact with other reality. In other words, reality is something which we can place in
a definite mental compartment with reasonable assurance that it will remain there. We
want to be able to think about reality as a unit, and not have it mixed up with or
overshadowed by unreality, or unresolved background. If a concept meets these
requirements reasonably well, we are reasonably happy with it and prepared to
consider it as real. If we are to understand the reality of spin we must satisfy ourselves
that it actually does met these criteria. Much of what follows is developed with this
end in view, and in recognition of the fact that it may be difficult to accept the status
of reality for something which seems to be merely a mental manipulation.
Even though the concept of spin may not be too acceptable at first as a basic reality,
when its many properties are explored and found to coincide with observed properties
of matter, and when from these properties may be predicted the laws which we know
matter to follow, the status of spin most certainly will be enhanced and with increased
understanding will come greater confidence in the beautiful simplicity of the
rectilinear concept of space within which spin manifests as the basic reality. In fact,
we will find that we need no further foundations upon which to build our complete
understanding of the material universe with all its glittering apparent complexity.

Part 2

The Structure of Spin

2.1 ~ The Spin Mechanism
The concept of spin is fundamental in nature and is the only concept in nature which
is absolute in its own right. The idea of spin has associated integrally with it the idea
of units, multiples and fractions of complete revolutions, and these units are
completely independent of any yardstick with which they may be measured. We can
conceive of enormously large and enormously small numbers and these are applicable
directly to spin, and have exactly the same significance with respect to any particular
spin to which they may be applied.
Within any interval of attention spin may make many revolutions, one revolution
only, or even a minute fraction of a revolution, without losing in any way its absolute
nature. In fact, within any interval of attention, it need not actually turn at all, but
merely display a tendency to turn, or be ready to turn. Or again, using our familiar
concept of time (which incidentally we shall have to modify severely), we could say
that one revolution completed in eternity would still be valid. On other words, there
are no intrinsic limits imposed on spin, and we can think about it exactly the same
way as we can think about any pure number, for that is precisely what it is: the basic
number of our material universe.
In our concept of rectilinear space we conceived of a single spin being present,
centered about a point and extending out indefinitely far, perhaps to infinity. We
satisfied ourselves that it could involve all of our space, and probably would unless
we chose to prescribe arbitrary boundaries, which could be relative to some arbitrary
yardstick at best. So now we can do two things: study the structure of a single spin,
and then the interaction of a plurality of spins, because we know by our experience
with this physical universe that spins do interact.
At this point it might be well to make a blatant statement, and leave the derivation of
it until much later, in order to facilitate understanding of what this discussion of spin
is leading up to. Since spin is the only concept which we have in this universe which
is absolute, it is fairly obvious that it must be the primordial building material of
matter and energy, and a unit of spin must be the basic unit of these manifestations.
All that we have in this material universe, whether matter or energy, is made up of
spin, various units of which are fitted together in manners becoming to each and every
form of matter or energy with which we are familiar, and many of which we do not
even yet suspect.

2.2 ~ The Units

Consider first a single spin alone in space. Let us inspect it closely to see what we
have. If our interval of inspection is sufficiently large we sill observe it to make one
complete revolution, and we can assign to that interval one unit, and we may
subdivide the unit to any extent we please, or we may observe it for a larger interval
while it makes many revolutions. We have thus defined a unit for our interval.
It is fairly obvious that since linear distances in rectilinear space are purely relative,
and spin is absolute, the interval of a unit of spin, or any fraction or any multiple of it
must be precisely the same regardless of the relative distance from the center of spin
that the observation was made. This point is of vital importance in the understanding
of the origin of time.
Furthermore, uniform subdivisions of an interval of spin must all be identical. This is
almost axiomatic, since if it were not so how could we tell anyway?
In our conceptions of space and spin we must understand that we are not limited in
any way to numbers in the vicinity of unity. We wish to establish relative values of
unity to construct useable scales, but there is no necessity whatsoever to confine our
thinking to the middle register of numbers. In fact, we will find that nature runs the
gamut of numbers from the infinitesimally small to the enormously large, for all
practical purposes from a real zero to a real infinity. Therefore we can construct our
practical scales where convenient.

2.3 ~ Distribution of Spin

So far, in our conception of spin, we have considered it to be distributed uniformly
throughout our rectilinear space. We have tacitly assumed that angular displacement
within any interval would be constant. However, under this concept it is apparent that
the farther one goes away from the center of spin, the greater will be the actual spin
displacement, and the reality of the spin will obviously be located anywhere else than
at the center of spin where we would suppose it to be and where it has to be if it is to
be consistent with our experience with matter.
While we can conceive of many possible distribution of spin, only one is consistent
with our universe as we find it. We cannot say whether or not other real universes can
co-exist with ours having spin distribution different from that of our universe, but it is
most unlikely that means would exist to detect them if they did. Spin in our universe
is almost certainly evenly distributed, in that the spin displacement is the same
regardless of the r elative distance from the center of spin. This concept is validated
by the fact that conclusions derived from it are entirely consistent with our experience
with matter and energy. If it were not so there would exist voids in our universe into
which our matter and energy could not penetrate, and we know of no such voids
although it is quite conceivable that they could exist. Certainly within the range of our
observations on the behavior of matter and energy the concept of even distribution of
spin displacement appears to be valid.
It is very important to understand what is meant by uniform displacement of spin, as
this peculiarity of structure is responsible for all the characteristics of matter and
energy with which we are familiar. Imagine a line in space being rotated around a
point and away from another line through the same point. If both lines are straight
there will be an increasing angle between the, the magnitude of which will be
indicative of the spin. Bit with uniform displacement of spin in any interval there is
just as much displacement of the line near to the point about which the turning takes
place as more remote from it. This is a consequence of the relativity of linear
measurements, and although related to the geometry of the spin must not be confused
with it. The obvious conclusion is that the interval near the center contains more units
than the interval farther out.
A natural question at this point is, just what is this interval about which we have been
talking? It should be noted that the word time has deliberately been avoided, and for a
very good reason. It is first necessary to establish the interval in terms of spin only, so
that derivatives of the interval can have an absolute status. The interval itself can next
be cut up into convenient and meaningful units, which are also absolute in nature. If
we wish, we can call these subdivisions by the name time, but if we do we must
realize that this time is not quite the same as the process which our clocks measure. It
is truly the amount of spin contained in an interval of attention, and nothing more.
2.4 ~ Spin Velocity
In the consideration of the distribution of spin and spin displacement, reference was
made to an arbitrary interval of attention. The amount of spin in this interval signifies
the extent of happening, or amount of reality present. But since the interval is
arbitrary while the spin is absolute, the unit of interval of necessity must be defined in
terms of spin.
I = Interval
i= Subdivisions of Interval
n = Number of subdivisions
S = Spin
D = Spin displacement

From geometry D = S / rI
rI = S / D which is constant for all values of r. But n i = I, from which r n i =
constant, from which it is apparent that n must be proportional to I / r if the values of i
are to be all the same. By suitable choice of units, which is permissible since our
interval is quite arbitrary, we can have n = I / r whence D = S / i.
The quantity D, which is spin per unit of interval, is spin velocity as referred to a unit
of time if we wish to think of the subdivisions of the interval as time. This quantity,
spin velocity or spin displacement, is a fundamental concept in nature, and although
we may use many and varied units for n and i, the quantity remains fixed when once
defined.
Spin velocity will be shown later to bear a close resemblance to the universal constant
c, or the velocity of light, but it would be erroneous at this stage to say that this is the
derivation of c, since there are other factors that also enter into its derivation. The real
fundamental constant is of course spin velocity, and this is constant for matter and
energy as we know them.

2.5 ~ The Tempic Field

A field is a region that has a unique characteristic. This definition is purposefully
broad and includes all kinds of fields. It even includes fields of grain and battlefields.
A broad definition is necessary since so far, all we have defined in the universe is a
three dimensional space (region) and spin (characteristic). But we know that our space
contains an enormous variety of things, all made of spin, and somehow we must
explain them all, We will have to study all the characteristics of spin in our region of
interest in order to do this. Therefore, we will tackle the job piecemeal and study each
field separately, that is each spin characteristic manifesting in the region.
In the consideration of the distribution of spin and in the derivation of the spin
velocity, it was pointed out that units of subdivision of an interval could be defined in
terms of spin, and that the number of such units was always proportional to the
amount or quantity of spin present at that point. Consider a region about a center of
spin, extending as far as we please in all directions. The distribution of spin is such
that more lies close to the center than farther away. Also, the units within the interval
of attention follow the same distribution. This is then a unique characteristic in our
region of interest qualifying it as a field, and in view of the fact that we may associate
units of interval subdivision with our ideas of time, it would be proper to give this
field a name having some kind of time significance. We will call it the tempic field.
The intensity of the tempic field is obviously the number of units of interval
subdivision associated with the spin that is present at that point. The distribution of
the field of course follows exactly the distribution of the spin that defines it. The more
intense the tempic field, the larger number of units necessary to express it.
Because of its very nature, and being located as it is in a rectilinear space, spin must
be both scalar and vector. That is, there will be a quantity of reality that does not
involve direction, and various characteristics that involve direction as well as
magnitude. By definition of the units by which spin is measured these units must
always be positive; therefore it is apparent that they cannot have direction, and must
be completely scalar in nature, but always additive. However, because of the
geometry of space and the distribution of spin, many of its characteristics will be
vectorial.
The tempic field actually is the direct manifestation of spin, and like the reality of the
spin quantity itself, is a scalar quantity. Its distribution throughout the space can,
however, have directional properties and hence be vectorial. We could say that the
tempic field is synonymous with the quantity of spin, although it would not be quite
correct to say that the tempic field and spin were the same thing.
It would be well to remember that the entire concept of interval, subdivisions of
interval, and tempic field, is necessary to enable us to conceive of spin as a real
quantity and to make it possible for something to happen in our concept of rectilinear
space. Our universe being what it is, a basic rectilinear or three-dimensional matrix,
with the only absolute quantity of spin with which to populate it, means that
regardless of what we might choose to call the various manifestations of spin they are
none the less real and are the building blocks of our matter and energy.
In order to determine just where reality lies we might perform an interesting
mathematical operation. Consider a system of spherical coordinates centered on our
spin center, with q as the vertical angle and ø as the horizontal angle. Let r equal the
radius and dv the element of volume.
dv = r cos q d ø r d q dr
But since the tempic field intensity is proportional to I / r, the quantity of spin in the
element dv is
dq = k dv / r3
dq = k cos q d q d ø dr / r
Integrating q = 4pi k loge r2 / r1
For unit radius k = 1 / 4pi , also note loge 1 = 0
Hence for unit radius one half the total spin lies inside a sphere of radius1, and half
lies outside. Also, the total quantity is 4pi times the quantity per unit volume. These
figures will be seen to have significance later when the various other spin fields are
considered.

Part 3

The Spin Fields

3.1 ~ The Significance of the Tempic Field
We have just satisfied ourselves that spin may be described or measured in terms of
subdivisions of an interval and that these units may properly be considered as a field.
We have called this field tempic field, rather than a time field, because time for us has
a connotation that is not strictly in accord with the characteristics of this field. As a
matter of fact, our clocks do not measure either time or tempic field; they measure
entropy changes. If it were not for the fact that so much of the matter in our universe
is behaving in a most ladylike manner, our clocks would indeed by quite erratic. It
will be shown later that time may be altered through natural processes or manipulated
by intelligent control.
Suppose again that we were disembodied entities, but this time located in space near
where a certain quantity of spin existed. If our psychological time sense were
reasonably good and we set about to explore the region we would find that it took us
longer to explore a given relative distance near to the spin center than farther away
from. Also, we would probably notice that if we moved at right angles to the line
joining our position with the spin center it would take us just as long to develop a
given angle regardless of how far from the spin center we might be. This is the true
concept of time, reduced to its most basic form.
As disembodied entities we are able to prowl around the spin center and investigate its
many aspects without disturbing it, and in order to understand it we must appreciate it
as it is, not through a third or fourth hand effect as may be shown on some crude
indicating instrument. When we understand the structure of matter then we may
devise confirmatory experiments using whatever instrumentation we please, but until
that understanding is attained, the proper tool is the uninhibited mind.
In our explorations of the region surrounding the spin center we would always find
some spin, and it would always be present. It would never become negative or zero,
although t might be quite small. But we would find that the tempic field intensity s
such that it could easily fool us in regard to the amount of space which we had
explored, particularly if we had used an arbitrary yardstick to measure it.
Again, if we used an arbitrary yardstick to measure the space, we would find that the
spin density would be inversely proportional to the distance from the spin center,
provided that our arbitrary yardstick didn't change. We would, however, find that the
time taken to explore an equal volume close to the center was more than that taken to
explore the same volume farther away. We might jump to the conclusion that time
was fixed, and that the space was stretched or warped close to the spin center. This is
precisely what happened when the Theory of Relativity was formulated. This theory
is quite valid, provided it is used only in a region where the tempic field bears a
simple relation to the relative linear scale; otherwise it can become frightfully
complicated as all who have struggled through it can testify.
The Theory of Relativity, therefore, is really a special case where Time is held
constant and everything else is allowed to vary if need be. Is it not ever so much
simpler to recognize the field nature of time and have a rectilinear space which is
straight forward and easy to understand, than to insist on a constant time with its
attendant necessity for continually introducing and trying to justify such weird
concepts as space warps, contractions, etc? The fact remains furthermore, that
whether we like it or not, the tempic field exists and no amount of skepticism will
make it go away.

3.2 ~ Simultaneity
In developing the properties of spin the term "interval" was used extensively. It was
not defined except by implication. In fact, it would be most difficult to define it
except in terms of spin itself. We could say, with respect to a single spin center, that
an interval was a multiple or fraction (or unity) of a complete revolution, but this
definition would not be valid when more than one spin center was under
consideration, except in special circumstances. It is suggested that understanding is
more readily attained if the term is always considered in this subjective sense, as
"interval of attention", and merely brackets the extent of our consideration for the
matter. This may seem to be laboring a point but a full appreciation of the term is
essential for an understanding of simultaneity.
Since the tempic field and therefore time at any point is the result of the spin
condition manifesting at that point the concept of simultaneity in its usual sense
becomes somewhat ambiguous and requires redefining. There is no great difficulty
when a single spin center is considered, or within a region where the tempic field is
constant, but the matter is not quite so simple in other cases.
Consider first the case of a single spin center. Here simultaneity would be established
by one or more straight lines converging on the spin center. In the practical case some
means of direct observation or communication along such lines is implied. If this is
not possible, then it is at once apparent that simultaneity cannot be established directly
and may only be deduced. Subjectively, however, we can visualize the spin angle
swept out within any given interval of attention and declare that simultaneity existed
throughout that particular spin during that interval. It must be carefully noted that this
simultaneity is quite separate from the amount of time that might have been included
in the interval in the various parts of the spin, although measurable by any of the
times.
Consider next a region that is relatively small enough that the tempic field is uniform
throughout. Here it is fairly obvious that simultaneity exists throughout the region.
Also, that within any interval of attention the amount of time existing is the same for
the entire region. The surface of the earth very closely approximates this condition.
In anticipation of cases to be discussed at greater length later, let us turn our attention
to something of a general case, where the tempic field is neither uniform nor follows a
simple pattern of distribution. Subjectively we can declare that simultaneity exists
throughout the region within any given interval of attention, but how are we to
establish this fact? Obviously, throughout the region different parts will have different
amounts of time within the interval, but unless we are able to observe all points
separately, or have means of communication between these points, we will not know
when to start counting the time at the start of the interval nor when to stop counting it
at the end.
Although simultaneity is a concept which in itself is not difficult, because of the
characteristics of spin that make up our universe, simultaneity cannot be established
unless the interval of attention starts with everything in which we are interested
located at a single point in space and finishes at another single point in space. This is
probably the most fundamental concept in connection with the tempic field, and
merely states that with respect to time one cannot have a cake and eat it too.
Suppose two observers started out from a point where the tempic field was t1 and one
went immediately to a region where the field was t2 and the other went to a region
where the field was t3. Suppose that there were three clocks that responded
proportionately to the tempic fields, one carried out by each of the observers and the
third remaining at the starting point. Suppose that, after a certain interval, both
observers returned to the starting point and compared notes. They would find that the
elapsed time as measured by the clocks was closely proportional to the fields within
which they had been operating, any discrepancies being due to the transition periods
between the various regions. Probably the two observers would disagree violently
with each other and with the home clock as to how long they had been away, but with
simultaneity established by common points of start and finish of the interval, they
would be forced to admit that the time change was real. Otherwise, the time would
appear to be absolute and simultaneity would be sacrificed.

3.3 ~ The Divergence of Spin

It was shown previously that the only reality that we have in our universe is spin. This
reality is of course both scalar and vector. The total quantity of spin is scalar and
represents the total quantity of reality. The distribution of this reality gives rise to
another scalar quantity, namely spin density, and also to several vector quantities,
including gradient, divergence and curl. There are also other tensor quantities as well.
Spin density was shown to have the characteristics of a field, the properties of which
were identified with a time aspect and the field seen to be that which gives rise to our
phenomena of time, and therefore was called a tempic field.
It may readily be appreciated that since spin is centered about a point and has a
distribution other than uniform, it must have a divergence. This divergence is identical
with the result of the mathematical operation of the scalar product of the differential
operator del, or unit differential vector with the spin unit itself. The mathematical
development will be dealt with later when we come to the integration of these basic
concepts with conventional science. With this subsequent analysis it will be shown
why the electric field has the properties that it displays, and how they got there.
Because, the divergence of spin is the electric field. Here again we have a
fundamental principle derived and stated.
3.4 ~ The Curl of Spin
Having seen that the divergence of spin results from the mathematical operation of the
scalar product of del and spin, we may next look at the vector product of these two
quantities. This produces the curl of spin, and again the detailed mathematical
developments will be deferred until we study the properties of the magnetic field,
because the curl of spin is the magnetic field. This may come as something of a shock,
particularly in the light of certain of our preconceived ideas regarding the structure of
magnetic fields. However, skepticism has never yet made a fact go away, and the
magnetic field is still the curl of a spin.
Incidentally, at this point we may inject a comment that was directed at our science
and in particular of our knowledge of magnetism: "Scientists of Earth know an
amazing number of things about magnetism which are not so!", and in the light of the
understanding of the true nature of magnetism this statement is most appropriate. The
two things that are possibly closest to our daily lives of the entire physical science are
magnetism and gravitation, and these are the things about which we have the wildest
misconceptions. One of our queer ideas about magnetic fields is that they are made up
of lines of force that loop around and close on themselves. Undoubtedly we got this
idea from playing with iron filings and a magnet. What we didn't see, however, was
what happened inside the magnet. In fact, the field does not close on itself and inside
the magnet it has exactly the same sense of direction as outside. These and many more
features of the magnetic field will be demonstrated later.

3.5 ~ The Gradient of Spin

Having considered the mathematical operation of the unit vector del on the vector
aspect of spin to obtain the divergence and curl, and having seen the significance of
these operations, let us next look at the effect or consequence of the operation of del
on the scalar aspect of spin. It is at once apparent that this will yield a gradient of spin
and to this we must attach meaning.
We have seen the scalar aspect of spin to be the parent quantity from which our time
is derived. The gradient of this quantity is therefore the rate of change over time over
the incremental distance considered and in the direction decreed by the unit vector
del. In writing this out we have
G = dt / dx + dt / dy + dt / dx = dt / ds
where t is the tempic field and s the distance in the direction of del. Inverting this
equation, we have
1 / G = ds / dt
which we recognize immediately to be a velocity.
Of course we will at once ask the question, if this gradient is the reciprocal of a
velocity, what is going where? The answer is that one spin center in the universe
would be unstable and at once expand to infinity, but within the structure of our
matter, the arrangement is such that these gradients precisely cancel each other out
and stable matter results. This property the gives us the clue for the manner in which
our matter is built up, and in effect is responsible for the ponderable nature of matter
It is interesting to note the relationship defining momentum, mass times velocity,
which is, of course, mass divided by the spin gradient. Or, we can define mass as the
product of the ponderability of matter and the spin gradient that produced it. Much
more will be said about these and other relationships later.

Part 4

Multiplicity of Spin Centers

4.1 ~ General Considerations
We have had a superficial look at the behaviors of a single spin center and a peek at a
multiplicity of spin centers. We know that our matter is made up of enormous
numbers of spin centers, some of which are relatively quite close together, so let us
now see what happens when there are a great many to consider.
In the first place, all the spin centers could be lined up; that is, their spin vectors could
all be pointing in the same direction. In this case we would say that such matter is
"polarized", and we would expect different properties than from unpolarized matter in
which the spin vectors were randomly oriented.
It may be readily appreciated that at any point the effect of the summation of each of
the fields due to each individual spin will depend on (a) the relative distance from the
reference point to each spin center, and (b) the relative orientation of the spin centers
with respect to one another. This consideration is apart from any "background" field
that may be present.
Since spin is both scalar and vector, it follows that the scalar components will simply
add up, while the laws of vector addition will be followed by the vector components,
with one important additional consideration. The scalar addition must be performed
before the mathematical operations with del are performed to yield the field
conditions. This consideration is merely stated at this stage as being important. Its
significance will be apparent later, but it has to do with the fact that spin, which is
what is being operated upon, is in itself the only absolute quantity with respect to
which the operation may be performed.
Another important consideration is to realize that spin centers are exactly what their
name implies; they are centers about which the units of reality function. They are not
particles. Therefore, the standard equations of vector analysis such as LaPlace's and
Poisson's equations may not always be valid. These equations are derived on the
assumption that the entire virtue of a particle is contained within the point center and
its only influence is apparent outside of the point. This is of course not the case, as the
entire virtue of a spin center actually lies completely outside the point center, and may
correctly be said to be everywhere except within the point.

4.2 ~ Summation of Scalar Spin

Consider first an aggregate or cluster of a large by a finite number of spin centers. At
any point the total spin will be the scalar sum of all the individual spins at that point.
The total resultant spin density will give the tempic field intensity at that point. If the
reference is very far from the cluster, then the resultant tempic field intensity will
appear to originate (approximately) from a single large spin center coincident with the
geometry of the cluster. It will be found to vary intensely as the distance from this
virtual center.
As the cluster is approached by the reference point, the tempic field intensity
increases according to the inverse distance law until quite near, when it levels off to
become nearly constant as the cluster is penetrated. The significant point here is that
the presence of additional spin centers modifies the simple inverse distance law of
spin distribution around a single spin center.
The exact description in any particular case can of course be worked out
mathematically but at this stage there is little point in doing so as it is only part of the
story and does not necessarily represent any actual condition of spin distribution. In
practical cases there is always a "background" of tempic field to be considered along
with the purely local consideration, and in addition there may be tempic fields due to
"dynamic" relationships between the other fields present in the region.

4.3 ~ Summation of Gradient of Spin

We have seen that the gradient of spin has the characteristic of one over a velocity;
also that the ponderability of matter multiplied by the spin gradient gives mass. It is
not too difficult to conceive of configurations of spin centers that will produce
extensive regions of reduced spin gradient. In these regions the apparent spin
velocities become high, but since the physical distances involved remain unchanged,
and spin velocity is constant, the effect is a decrease in the tempic field. In other
words, holes are formed in the background of the tempic field, i.e., there is to all
intents and purposes negative spin introduced. Surrounding these holes there will be
represent all the characteristics of new, but negative, spin centers with their attendant
fields superimposed on the fields of the original spin centers that produced the holes.
In a matrix of a large number of spin centers all oriented in the same direction, it is
easy to see that there will be very nearly the same number of holes formed in the
spaces between them. In the microscopic sense the gradients balance and the entire
mass is stable. In the case of a large number of randomly oriented spin centers only a
few will produce real holes, with the remainder producing "virtual" holes. These
virtual holes are none the less real even though they lie in effect "outside" the spin
centers responsible for their existence.

If we look at a pair of spin centers that are oriented in the same direction, we find a
hole developing between them, and a "shell" of increased spin developing around
them. On the other hand, if they are oriented in the opposite direction, a region of
increased spin develops between them and a shell of reduced spin develops around
them.
Here we must be careful to maintain a clear concept of what is going on. The scalar
aspect of spin is its absolute reality and is either present or absent. It has no fixed
direction or polarity. It adds up arithmetically to produce the total amount of reality
present. The distribution of spin, however, is a function of relative position and its
derivative, the gradient of spin, also has direction in that it is a scalar quantity
measured in a certain direction. In the foregoing, the basic spin units remain unaltered
by the presence or absence of other spin units, but the field structure associated with
them is altered by the presence of other spin centers.
Where holes develop, there is no change in the absolute quantity of spin present, only
a redistribution; a conversion of some spin from positive to negative, super-imposed
on the background of positive spin.
We may ask what the difference is between a real and a virtual hole. A real hole
develops in "polarized" matter where the gradient of spin is reduced in the space
between the spin centers and increased in the region surrounding the spin centers.
Consequently, since the ponderability of matter is proportional to the reciprocal of the
spin gradient, such polarized matter loses ponderability while still retaining reality
(mass) with respect to all outside consideration. A virtual hole develops in
unpolarized matter and may have almost any distribution from a real hole to a
completely virtual hole as in the case of opposite spin orientation. The one feature in
common is that of increasing the ponderability of matter with respect to outside
considerations.
Where there are available large numbers of randomly oriented spin centers patterns of
real and virtual holes can develop, which when taken together with patterns resulting
from other field considerations give rise to the structure of matter as we know it.

Part 5
[ This part was not written ]
5.1 ~ Definition of Force
5.2 ~ Changing Reality
5.3 ~ Work & Energy

Some further writings

 The Tempic Field
Verbatim extracts from the Smith archive
They tell me that our universe is actually twelve dimensioned, built in four fabrics of
three dimensions each. The fabrics are all at right angles to each other except for the
"skew" which is responsible for the frozen reality which we call matter.
The conventional theories of space-time-fields which we are taught are actually
special cases, and derived from the fundamentals by holding several factors constant.
Unfortunately, the models of atoms, etc. which we conjure up are inadequate and
misleading and conventional science which is based on them, and using the restricted
theories, naturally can't take us very far. It is as if we have climbed the tree of
knowledge, crawled out on the first branch we came to and are now busily engaged
calipering the twigs; ignoring completely the other branches.
Our greatest failing is assuming that each bit of information which we glean must be
fastened firmly onto something which we already know, or think we do. As a result
our science is a terrible hodge-podge of patch work, perturbations and correction
factors, and ever so much more complicated than it need be.
There are three basic fields in nature, which manifest mathematically as gradient,
divergence and curl, or; tempic, electric and magnetic. Time we think is the reciprocal
of the derivative of the tempic field, and it is not basic in its own right. We might
incompletely describe the tempic field as that which produces change. Or we might
regard it somewhat as the Heaviside operator "p" when applied to functions involving
time. But we find it simpler to just write "J" and treat it exactly as we would any other
field function, by writing back from observation to determine what the function is.
I am informed that what our clocks register is not actually time, but rate of change of
entropy and that time is actually a field which makes the entropy change; that there is
very little difference between time and the other two fields which make up the field
fabric, magnetic and electric. It is true that there is a "skew" between the time field
and what our clocks do, otherwise there would be no components between the space
and field fabrics, and no interchange of matter and energy.
We were told to expect a change in our time scale, starting this spring. You see, time
as we know it is a result of the operation of a "time field" which resembles closely
electric and magnetic fields. The thing that Einstein considers as the fourth dimension
is really an entropy vector which we have trained ourselves to consider as time. We
do not know how fast the time scale is to change but we already have indications that
it has shifted a fraction of a second.
I have a very recent communication from one of the boys topside, to the effect that
our physicists are going to carry out an experiment dealing with the lifetime of
mesons at high velocities. The results of this experiment will, if interpreted correctly,
establish definitely the field nature of time and the fact that it is not a constant
immutable quantity. I have been requested to bring this to the attention of the
scientists involved, so that they can follow up the lead to the obvious advantage of our
world.
The people from elsewhere are quite capable of altering the time field in their vicinity
to their own ends, much the same as electric and magnetic fields may be manipulated;
and therefore, having three variables to play with there are many more combinations
possible, and so the saucers can do things which seem to contradict our physics,
because we hold as constants some of the things which they vary. There is ample
evidence about us to confirm these things, if we will but look at it squarely and not try
to explain it away as something else. Lately there have been a surprising number of
references in the literature implying the field nature of time. I don't know how much
of this is inspired and how much our people figured out for themselves, but the fact
remains that this is the trend.
Space itself is not at all as we imagine it. Light does not travel in straight lines out in
space, but in curves somewhat resembling parabolas which are the result of the light
passing through regions where the time field is not uniform. Our sun is not at all
where it appears to be, is actually much bigger and much closer than we think. The
planets do not revolve around the sun in a planar orbit but are offset way off to one
side so that the orbits lie as rings along a solid hyperbola. This may seem queer but is
none the less true, and follows precisely from the concept of time as a field. This is a
hard concept to appreciate but when mastered makes for an enormous simplification
in all physical sciences.
Knowing about the tempic (time) field has obviously led to the question of the true
positions of our planets and I have been working along that line. It is most remarkably
consistent but rather disturbing to realize that the things in the sky just aren't where
they seem to be. There are some dillies of mathematical equations to be solved,
several of which I have no idea how to tackle. The saucer people use operational
methods, of which I have a glimmering but not nearly enough to use profitably, so I
have to do it the hard way. However, one fact stands out above all else; mankind
could never find out about the tempic field by observation alone, since the light
linkage and mechanical linkage between astronomical bodies is exactly self
compensating! The only clue that I know of is the odd shapes of the distant nebulae.
The time field is probably the most fundamental concept, but I am satisfied that it is
right, because using it as a basis, practically all the other phenomena which they
describe can be worked out and theoretically confirmed. You see, time as we
recognize it is really an entropy scale brought about by the action of a field which is
similar in all respects to the electric and magnetic fields but at right angles to them
both. Because of our point of view since we are made of matter having spins all lined
up in the field fabric, the three fields appear different to us. The tempic field is
actually 1/t and is the field which psychic communications continually refer to as
"frequency", which by definition is 1/t. The tempic field is as much a part of matter as
either of the other two fields, and when there is lots of matter there is a strong field,
and in this field equal intervals of action contain our "time" inversely proportional to
the field strength. For confirmation I would refer you to the distribution of mass
within the various nebulae, the corresponding tempic field distribution, and the
dynamics of rotation of the nebulae. The resulting development is most elegant both
in confirming the field nature of time and the heretofore unexplained shapes of many
of the nebulae!
I am well aware that regarding time as a variable places modern science in the
untenable position of trying to lift itself by its bootstraps; but I can only say that these
are not my ideas but originate with those to whom our science resembles medieval
superstition. I do not understand them fully and I have much to learn, but I have
mastered a few basic principles and of these I am sure.
• Time as a field function is not the same function as registered by our clocks,
which record the changing entropy of a system, but is the function which
makes this happen.
There is only one reality in our universe, and that is the concept of spin, and
from this derive twelve dimensions. Twelve dimensions are necessary and
sufficient to express our universe in its entirety.
• Dimensions must include as well as their vector dimensions, the component of
reality in that direction, for without the reality there would be no dimension.
• Dimensions are arranged in four fabrics of three each, linked by a "quadrature
concept". This is the concept that Relativity strives for by introducing √-1
between the space and the time axis.
• The concept of "force" is a fiction which we invented to stultify our thinking.
It is merely a cover-up for our lack of understanding of the interaction of
reality.
The foregoing will probably sound most sacreligious to the ears of orthodoxy, but I
don't mind in the least if these ideas are not immediately subscribed to. Science has a
long and lurid history of reluctance to accept ideas which subsequently proved to be
of great value.
Time, as our clocks measure it, is really the rate of change of entropy in this part of
our universe, and exists because of the presence of the basic reality. It may be altered
by altering the configuration and proportion of the basic fields or it may be increased
or decreased in a certain region by redistribution of reality. This may seem to be quite
complicated, and it is for anyone with our limited understanding of nature; but really
quite simple to those whose understanding transcends ours.
In order to hold a flying saucer against gravity, it is necessary to arrange things so that
gravity will push a bit instead of pulling. This is done by introducing a downward
divergence of the tempic field in the region occupied by the greater part of the saucer,
with zero divergence in the region occupied by the crew, so that the outward
divergence operating on the whole ship will equal the downward divergence operating
on part of the ship, and the crew will be subject to normal outward divergence and
hence normal gravity. There will of course be a compensating increased outward
divergence somewhere near the ship, but this is usually distributed over a fairly large
volume so as to cause a minimum of external disturbance.
One of the inadequate ideas we have is that light always travels in straight lines. This
is true only when it is travelling in a uniform tempic field or in line with the direction
of divergence in a diverging field. If a wave front of light is passing through a region
where one side of it enjoys more "time" than the other, the side having larger "time"
will travel farther, and the beam of light will refract away from the region of increased
"time". A beam of light passing near to a saucer which is making use of altered
tempic field for support will be deflected and appear to originate from somewhere
else than its true source. If the field configuration around a saucer is favourable the
light originating from the saucer may be bent so that none of it arrives at the position
of the observer, in which case the observer sees nothing. In these cases, the saucer
may be quite clearly visible from some other angle or position. If the saucer is seen,
and then disappears, it is probably due to the alteration of the field conditions by the
occupants.
 The Tensor Beam
Verbatim extracts from the Smith archive
The information leading up to the coil’s construction came from "topside", and
therefore I feel I have absolutely no property rights to it, and I would be most pleased
if data could be published to an extent which would preclude future patentability. I do
not care one way or the other whether or not I am identified with the coil, but if I am I
would prefer to be merely the intermediary by whom the design was received.
We were told about a system which uses a radio transmitter as an energy source but
has a special antenna converter, which radiates doughnut shaped waves, which are not
time functions. … Following are the construction instructions. One ferrite core,
material with the highest permeability and dielectric constant, about 8 inches to a foot
long, and about 1 inch in diameter. About 20 feet of plastic insulated #14 electric
house wire. Starting at the center of the wire and at one end of the core, wind on the
wire as closely as possible, with the first turn under and then over, so that the winding
will be exactly symmetrical. It will start at one end of the core and finish at the other
end and will resemble a solenoid with a bifilar winding. It is important that the
winding be exactly symmetrical.
The size of the coil is not critical, nor is the winding beyond the fact that it must be
symmetrical. Of course the combination determines the critical frequencies at which
conversion takes place. Even if you use rods as small as 1/8 inch and wind with #36
wire it should work at reasonable medium high frequencies.
When measured on a radio frequency bridge, it shows very peculiar properties. There
are certain frequencies at which it is impossible to balance the RF bridge, and that is a
direct contradiction to what any electrical engineer will tell you should happen with a
coil wound on a ferrite core.
This coil converts ordinary radio frequency energy into a tensor beam. It depends on
the particular sample of ferrite and the selection of operating frequency and power.
There is definitely an optimum frequency and a minimum power to generate the
beam. Your best indication is when you feed a fair amount of power into the unit
without it getting the least bit warm. If it does get warm, you are doing something
wrong. Incidentally, I am talking in terms of at least 100 watts RF input.
Apparently the hole down the center of the core is necessary for its proper
functioning, as is an adequate power input. It will take a kilowatt comfortably,
without heating at all, and we know that it will work on 100 watts, but it won’t work
for us on 30 watts. It just gets hot on the lower power! I don’t know what the lower
cutoff power is.
The main point is to find the frequencies at which it will "convert" ordinary radio
energy into tensor energy. At these frequencies it is possible to send a kilowatt or
more into the coil without it showing any tendency to get warm. Under these
conditions a small but real tensor beam is being generated, and with which an expert
operator can accomplish a great deal. I can't tell you how to find the critical
frequencies because each coil and ferrite core have different values, but trial and error
will disclose them eventually. There are several for each unit.
With regard to the antenna, this gadget isn't actually an antenna but we call it such for
lack of a better name. It generates a special type of wave, which is not a hertzian
wave. It more closely resembles the waves which follow nerves.
When connected to a transmitter, treat it as any normal antenna for loading and
tuning. There will be a few points of magnetic domain resonance which will be lossy
but anywhere else the device will generate the required waves. It will not matter
whether or not the antenna converter is shielded as the doughnut waves go through
anything. The most remarkable property of this system is that the waves can be
directly mentally.
I think you might be a bit hasty in dismissing “telepathic” communication with these
people from elsewhere, since I know that the system they use does resemble telepathy
to some extent, but it actually is electrical, even though they have cut out most of the
intervening equipment such as microphones, earphones, vocal cords etc. I have
generated this energy in the lab, but I am not smart enough to do anything with it; I
only know that it exists, and the boys from topside admit that it is what they use.
The tensor beam I have found to be quite unmanageable. I can generate it OK but
can't make it do much for me. You see, it is identical with the energies associated with
the life functions in the human body and accordingly can be incorporated and directed
with them, by mental control, by experts! I hope someday to be able to do it, but I am
informed that it takes at least 10 years of concentrated training for the experts to learn
how to do it.
The principle of this antenna is quite simple. It emanates doughnut shaped waves
which ??? on propagation as do hertzian waves. Since the energy content is
microscopic, the mass equivalent is very low and consequently they can be "budged"
easily. In fact, they can be mentally directed quite easily, when once one has mastered
the trick, (much like wriggling one's ears). In construction, the antenna is merely a rod
or tube of Ferrite, or Ferroxcube, which has a high permeability, high dielectric
constant and reasonably low loss at radio frequencies. On it is wound a winding of
such type that turn by turn it is completely symmetrical, and progresses from one end
to the other. The pitch of the winding, i.e; distance from turn to turn, is equal to π
times the diameter of the turns divided by the square root of the product of the
permeability and dielectric constant, both as applicable to the frequency to be used.
We used one inch Ferrite tubes with a half inch hole, about 8 inches long and plastic
insulated wire. The theory of operation is that the RF current flowing in each turn
generates loops of magnetic flux within the Ferrite, and this in turn generates loops of
electric flux and the whole is threaded on loops of tempic field. As the radio currents
progress along the Ferrite rod the little doughnuts are pushed off the end and sent on
their way. Reception takes place whenever the doughnuts encounter any material
through which they can progress with the same net phase conditions as if they passed
outside of it. In other words it is three field resonance condition. The units used by the
space people are very tiny and are connected directly to suitable nerve endings.
Incidentally, the electric impulses which nerves pass along are quite similar to these
doughnut waves.
I have played a bit and found some extraordinary properties, one of which confirms
the mathematics that the waves which this converter generates are not like Hertzian
waves and do not depend on propagation for their continued existence. Consequently,
I would have the idea that they would travel at whatever speed the sender could
decree. I know that they will stay in one place for a long time.
The coil doesn't work as well on a receiver as an antenna, but any ferrite core with a
coil on it can convert the doughnut waves into RF, when both the equipment and the
operator are properly adjusted, and this latter I cannot tell you how to do; it is
something one must find out for oneself, like wriggling the ears, I guess. However,
once established, the circuit locks itself on and stays put as long as you want it.
Insofar as calling the space stations is concerned, I haven't any better idea than you as
to how to go about it. They said that if they could pick up our signals they would
answer. It was explained to me that there is much difficulty in radio communication
since it is time dependent (velocity) and their time scale is different from ours by a
factor of 2 ¹/3, and in addition there is a waver which makes it very hard to
synchronize on any fixed frequency. It is only at times when the waver is regular
enough to be reasonably predictable that it can be done at all. That is why they want
us to develop the interlocking doughnut wave system, as it is not time dependent.
Some time ago we tried radio contact with the saucer people on 19,940 kc, but
without much luck. Apparently, they could hear us sweeping by their receiver
settings, and we could hear a powerful station sweeping erratically across 19,940 but
we couldn't tune it in. They said that it was due to the unstable nature of the earth's
tempic field. If this is the case, then the doughnut waves should be the clear thing for
communicating with them. They say that is what they use.
With respect to this time business, I hope that you appreciate the fact that time is
actually a field, the operation of which on matter gives us an entropy scale which we
call "time". This field is very much like electric and magnetic fields except that it is at
right angles to both. This appreciation is just beginning to seep through to the
consciousness of a few bold souls in the field of natural philosophy. The last issue of
Physical Review (Ed. – letter dated February 7, 1955) carries an article which is only
a step removed from this recognition.
With regard to the ferrite cores, ... the formula which I gave you is based on the fact
that all fields become established through Hertzian waves, and although we usually
consider that fields contain energy, they really are only indicators of the relative
energy level existing with reference to the space or material about which the field is to
be found. When electrons are accelerated their relative energy levels are changed, and
the indicators of this condition move into position as Hertzian waves. The fields
within ferrite are due to changing energy levels of atoms with singular spins. These
are reoriented as a result and in response to, the field (indicators) of the accelerated
electrons in the wire. This means that the singular spins are rotated, which in turn
produce more fields (indicators) which in turn induce further rotation. The net result
of all this is that a sequence of spin re-alignments takes place within the ferrite which
moves through the ferrite with a velocity equal to the velocity of light in free space,
divided by the square root of the product of the effective permeability and dielectric
constant. These last two quantities are not quite what we have been taught but our
ideas are close enough to be useful. Now, the wave progressing through the ferrite
must travel at the same velocity as the inducing wave in the surrounding wire, hence
the formula. However, as the singular spins are rotated into new positions they obey
perfectly normal vectorial laws, in three space and three field dimensions, and in so
doing generate doughnut-shaped waves which comprise of closed electric, closed
magnetic and closed but linked tempic fields. They are literally pushed out of the far
end of the ferrite core and sent merrily on their way. Since they involve extremely
small mass they are easily directed, and since their rate of assimilation can be exactly
the same as the rate of generation, (within a region having substantially the same
tempic field) they can be tuned in any receiver which has a closed circuit input.
 Gravity Control
Verbatim extracts from the Smith archive
Gravity cannot be explained by orthodox science, although it might seem to be
possible at first sight. Such attempts will go only so far and bog down because a
concept is needed which is not in our science. We think we have this concept, and our
efforts with gravity seem to bear this out. There are three basic fields in nature, which
manifest mathematically as gradient, divergence and curl, or; tempic, electric and
magnetic. Time we think is the reciprocal of the derivative of the tempic field, and it
is not basic in its own right. We might incompletely describe the tempic field as that
which produces change. Or we might regard it somewhat as the Heaviside operator
"p" when applied to functions involving time. But we find it simpler to just write "J"
and treat it exactly as we would any other field function, by writing back from
observation to determine what the function is.
Our major design effort now is looking towards making a magnetic field move
without having to move the magnets. It should be possible, since we found that the
converse was true. Also, there are some rules concerning fields, which are not in the
literature, which might be exploited to attain this end. We refer in particular to the
rule that fields can and will remain as separate entities if such arrangement has a
lower energy level than that of the corresponding field structure. Also, we found that
magnetic fields move only at right angles to their vectorial directions, and in strict
correspondence with Maxwell’s equations. They refuse stubbornly to move in their
vectorial direction, and any apparent motion in this direction is actually a folding in or
folding out of the field, always at right angles.
We have drawn up quite a few designs to make the field move, but have discarded
most of them either because the present technology was inadequate to do the job, or
there was too much uncertainty as to what actually would be going on. We have one
design which looks promising, namely notching a circular DC field with a (1 - cos θ)
function which is rotating and confining the whole in a shield so that the lower energy
level is attained if the field structure rotates. We haven’t tried it yet, and it will
probably be fall before we can test this principle. However, it looks promising.
We visualize the magnetic field to have somewhat the configuration of the red lines
(Ed. - on his sketch), with somewhat more field outside of the ring than inside it.
There are discontinuities in the magnet structure due to the fact that the individual
wafers are square, but this seems to be an asset rather than a liability as it ensures that
the field turns with the magnets, since a higher energy level would be required to
bridge the gap between the wafers if it did not turn.
Rotation of the magnet-carrying disc causes the field to acquire a velocity throughout
its structure, said velocity being directly proportional to the radius. The V x B will in
all cases be at right angles to the velocity and the field vector, and will be proportional
to the magnetic field strength and the velocity. We hold that this condition will apply
equally within the magnets as outside of them, since the magnetic field exists there
also.
Following the above reasoning, it is apparent that a virtual gravitron will form on the
outer edge of the magnetic ring and another of opposite polarity on the inner side of
the ring. The outer gravitron will be somewhat stronger than the inner one, and the
field configurations will be determined by the antecedents of the field (magnitude and
direction of the magnetic and charge fields, reducing the gravitron field).
However, since the entire structure is immersed in the earth’s gravitational field, the
antecedents of which may or may not be compatible with the locally generated field,
two complexes are possible, within a field structure or a field aggregate. Experiment
must give the answer.
A note to bring you up to date on our gravity work here. The results are satisfactory,
except that we blew up the equipment. We calculated that we had a factor of safety of
at least three, but were mistaken, and spent several hours picking bits of ceramic
magnets out of the local landscape. Fortunately, no one was injured.
We have rebuilt our machine and are now about to look for some of the answers to
some questions. This unit has about 14 ceramic magnets mounted in a groove cut in a
3/4 inch thick 6 inch diameter disc. We haven’t yet run it up to full speed as we are
very cautious after the other exploding. We don’t expect much from this machine
except maybe answers to a couple of pointed questions.
We have considered the use of a conventional gravimeter, but we do not think that it
would be as good as the precision balance. The sensing element in the gravimeter is
several inches from the bottom of the instrument, and since a table of sorts is
necessary, it would not be possible to get the sensing element within a foot of the
magnets.
Our work here has been progressing slowly because of silly little mechanical troubles.
We have built 5 commutators to swich the currents to produce a rotating field and
there has been a serious difficulty with each. We are now working on a rolling
mercury design which looks promising.
We did try to use the rotating field from the ceramic magnets to drag around a field
produced by a coil and current, but there seems to be a problem with the compatibility
of the antecedents of the fields, because the limits within which it will spin are
apparently narrow and we have not yet been able to determine their magnitude or the
rules governing this action.
Because of the commutator difficulties we have not yet been able to try the big
rotating field, but we have it all built and if and when we get this last bug licked we
should be able to look for a few answers...
Last Sunday (Ed. - October 26, 1959) we wound the machine up and took some
measurements. We got about a 1% change in gravity with it, which was barely enough
to feel with fingers. It is very satisfying to be able to poke fingers into the impossible
and feel it! I think this little machine should be able to develop a 10% change
eventually, before we have to build a bigger and better one. We also took some
pictures, stills and an 8 mm movie of our machine operating, so we have the evidence
now. Even if our gadget doesn't fly yet, at least it creeps!
The effect was measured on a precision chemical balance, when a brass weight
increased from 24.4623 grams to 24.4628 grams when active material (cubic inch of
aluminum) was 10 inches directly under the weight. Needless to say we have much
yet to do and as soon as we have some relationships established we will prepare a
suitable paper, a copy of which I will send you if you are interested.
The experiment consisted of a ring of ceramic magnets set in a mount so the whole
could be rotated at a fairly high speed, about 12,000 rpm. The ring of magnets was
about an inch wide, an inch thick, and about 6 inches in diameter. The magnet
strength was about 2000 gauss. There was no doubt about the artificial gravity which
was generated by this unit as it could easily be weighed on a precision balance and
under certain conditions could be "felt". However, due to the configurations involved,
numerical values were hard to obtain as displacement of the sensing bob altered the
point of observation, but weight differentials of about 1% were observed several
times. (Ed. - See photos of an apparatus similar to what is described here.)
In your last letter you expressed concern about the field rotating with the magnet, or
remaining stationary, with the magnet going around inside the field. We had this
trouble too, and it proved most annoying. Apparently, there is a rule for field
behaviour, that fields will integrate to form a structure only if their antecedents are
compatible and the structure has a lower energy level than the corresponding field
aggregate. Being aware of this rule, we are now able to avoid some of the pitfalls
which we encountered at first.
Our laboratory experiments have allowed us to make about a 1% change in the weight
of objects --- we can make them about 1% heavier or 1% lighter. Now that is a long
way from holding a spacecraft up, because we have to go over 100% to do that. But
the fact that we can do it --- the fact that the principles which these people from
outside gave us and guided us to finding out for ourselves are valid --- certainly
indicate that, first, these people are what they say they are, and, secondly, that their
technology is that they say it is, that it is superior to ours and that ours is inadequate in
many respects.
 Alien Contact
Verbatim extracts from the Smith archive
We have been actively engaged in the study of UFO for about twelve years, and
scientific oddities much earlier than this. We came to the conclusion about ten years
ago that the UFO were real, of extraterrestrial origin, built and operated by people
very much like us, and of whom we are descendents.
They are real spacecraft, operated by people like us, who are keeping an eye on things
here. We have been in touch with them and have obtained considerable data upon
which we are working towards a better understanding of the laws of the universe.
These people are away ahead of us in all ways, but nevertheless our friends, and are
willing to help us; but not to the extent of giving us a technology with which to make
better and bigger bombs.
For your information every nation on this planet has been officially informed of the
existence of the space craft and their occupants from elsewhere, and as nations they
must accept responsibility for any lack of action or for any official position which
they may take. There is nothing more to be done along these lines, and effort in this
direction is effort wasted.
Apparently, there are quite a few groups of space people operating in the vicinity of
this planet, and while they have knowledge of each other they do not engage in
extensive interchange of ideas. Some of them are working for the benefit of the
human race, others to fulfil a "plan", and still others are merely "tourists". Something
drastic is due to happen here shortly and I suppose it is natural that people would
flock here to observe it.
Apparently, the time for us is very short and there are several groups who have an
interest in the outcome. Most of them are friendly, but there is at least one bad lot who
are bent on exploitation. These latter have a base of some kind near North Bay.
However, I'm afraid that there is precious little that we can do.
So far I have not enjoyed a direct contact with these people, all my contacts being
through some intermediate means or person. The boys topside have advised me that in
my case there is a definite reason for this but don't elaborate. I am also told that there
are quite a few contacts being made.
I am personally convinced that the saucers are real, that they are operated by
intelligences more advanced than we are, that they are not hostile, and that they would
associate with us if they could be convinced that we were not savages at heart.
I have never met any of these people from elsewhere myself face to face, although
several of my friends have, and I have confidence in their veracity. I have
communicated with them by radio and by "tensor beam", and indirectly through
contacts, and I can honestly say that I am as well acquainted with some of these
people from outside as I am with people with whom I work at my office. There is no
doubt in my mind as to their existence or that they are what they say they are.
I can tell you something about the UFO people. They are of the same basic human
stock as we. They have been civilized for a very long time. Cosmic Law requires that
each race work out its own destiny, provided that it does not menace others. We are a
menace, therefore we must be "dealt with", but the dealings will be "Acts of God" and
our own fananglings, or so they will seem to us. The saucer people stand ready to help
and teach us as soon as we are ready. I cannot "prove" these statements yet but I know
them to be true and have reason to believe that this will be common knowledge before
long.
It is my opinion that the people from elsewhere choose all sorts of methods to make
contact with us, and their technology and understanding being much better than ours,
they can use methods which we find quite incomprehensible. Most of the Contacts of
whom I have knowledge are "mental" in one form or another, directly or indirectly,
but they do seem to range through almost all sorts of means, right down to personal
face-to-face contact. You asked about the withered spots on our lawn. I feel quite sure
that they were caused by the field from one of the little monitors; a sphere about as
big as a small grapefruit. Such a monitor has been seen around my home on several
occasions, sometimes with his light on and sometimes with it off. I think this
particular model belongs to one certain group which were particularly interested in a
phase of our activity going on at the time. I have no evidence of its presence since last
fall.
As for the inconsistencies reported by the various contacts, I am not in the least
disturbed by them. There are many times as many people off this planet as on it, and
they live under all sorts of conditions. They are at a variety of stages of evolvement,
and their interests are bound to be more varied than ours. Consequently, it is logical to
me that the views which we get of them are bound to vary quite a bit.
I do not agree with NICAP policy on contact stories. I have spent too many hours
conversing with people from elsewhere to have any doubts about their reality or that
they are what they claim to be. Those of us who have been fortunate enough to have
made contact with these people have learned a great deal, and profited greatly through
this knowledge, in those things which really count, which we can take with us.
One group through whom I have been working seem to have made a pretty solid
contact with the saucer people and from them I have learned a lot. At first it all
seemed pretty fantastic, because they told me that some of the things which I fondly
thought to be foundation stones of our science just weren't so. Consequently, I set out
to either confirm or disprove, and the result is that I satisfied myself that they are
right! Naturally, I have been exposed to their kindergarten, so to speak, but I have
learned much.
With respect to the technology of the saucers, I can only state that we have learned
much. The technology under which they operate is much more advanced than ours;
my estimate is about a 500 year differential.
The boys topside make extensive use of significant events for all sorts of purposes
including communications. I am also told that they navigate their ships by what we
would call astrology. They also make use of a type of energy which we do not
understand, "Tensor energy, or Beam" which is space-time independent, for all their
menial tasks and communications. I am informed that ours is by no means the first
civilization which has existed on this planet. There have been many others, and even
some of the souls at present incarnated here participated in these previous
experiments. There exists in very inconspicuous places in several museums, artifacts
which represent a culture at least as high as ours, and which existed during the coal
age!
All is not quite as it seems, and our conventional ideas about electricity, magnetism,
gravitation, and time are not entirely correct. The saucer people do not realize that we
have these odd ideas. They assume that because we have made a certain amount of
scientific progress that we do have basically sound ideas.
Furthermore, we have mistakenly drawn a heavy veil between our spiritual world and
our physical world, and there are even many to whom the spiritual world is something
vague to be mentioned only on Sunday. I understand from the people from elsewhere
that such is not generally the case with them. For many of them there is no real veil
between the physical and the spiritual, and communication and participation between
the two is quite the normal thing.
I have done quite a bit of work along the lines of basic physics, but I have been
requested by the boys topside not to publish any of this yet, as the world is not yet
ready. You see, there are many earth people who have each been entrusted with a
portion of the new knowledge, but until certain events have taken place this
information may not be assembled into the whole.
Apparently the Higher Authority does not wish time field information to get wide
dissemination. I prepared a tape with a very brief outline of the principles on it for
Williamson. He started it playing but after about 10 to 20 seconds it got all fouled up
with goo which resembled rubber cement! They scraped and scoured, breaking the
tape, but couldn't get it going, so they hauled the tape off, wound it up by hand and
sent it back, all plastered in goo. When I got it, there was just a trace of goo left which
was gone by the next day. So I take it that this bit of information with which I am
entrusted must remain confidential for the present at least.
Dr. Stedman had a similar experience when he attempted to photograph a spectrum
for publication purposes, which would establish the field nature of time. The rare
element which he had isolated was removed from right under his nose!
I have no doubt at all about the authenticity of the greater part of the saucer contacts,
but what puzzles me is the apparent completely independent actions of the various
units. I suppose I am conditioned by earth thinking but it seems to me that they are
missing a good bet by not co-ordinating their efforts. Then again there is the problem
of the various "planes" and how these tie in with the various groups who obviously
are operating hereabouts and communicating with earth people. I would like very
much to establish a radio circuit of some kind, in lieu of course of a personal contact.
One thing which I would like to check thoroughly is the identity of all the various
space people, where they are from and some of their objects hereabouts. I am
deliberately keeping you in the dark with regard to my other contacts so I can work
this phase of the check. Could you find out from your various contacts the names of
as many space people as possible, and the names and objects of their various projects,
and also if they know corresponding particulars of other space people and projects?
What I hope to do is find the same group of people making contact at two or more
places not related. So far I have been able to get a few check points but not nearly as
many as I would like to have. It would appear that each group works hard to establish
a contact and then rests on their laurels thereafter. It doesn't make too much sense.
There is one point which I think we all should bear in mind at all times when
assessing these communications. I am convinced that the majority of them are
genuine, but subject to a fundamental lack of precision in semantics. By this I mean
that most of the people from other worlds use direct thought communications, which
in itself is quite precise, but when they have anything to do with us they must work
through a language. Consequently, although they appear to have a pretty good
knowledge of the language, close examination brings out the fact that they frequently
have pretty weird ideas about the meaning of some of our words. For example, one
group with whom I was conversing used words entirely in their literary sense. We
were discussing mathematics, I asked about their number scale which was ten like
ours, since they also have ten fingers. I asked the difference between seven and three,
and was told that there was no difference since they were both numbers! I asked when
one subtracted three from seven how much was left and was told, nothing, since when
one subtracts it is all gone! Further questioning brought forth the fact that their
mathematics is operational and not equivalent as ours is. But this goes to show how
careful one must be with the values of words.
There is another point to consider, and that is what appears to be a fundamental
cosmic law; no information can be passed through intervening means or medium
unless that intervening mechanism has been coded to carry that information. In other
words, no saucer person can tell us anything about his way of life or technology
unless the individual receiving the disclosure already has within his experience or
knowledge the concepts and terminology applicable to it. This seems to apply equally
to a person to person contact as well as information passed second or third hand or
even through machines. I am sure you will appreciate this point after you have
thought about it a bit. Some learned man a while back remarked that there was no
royal road to learning, and I am convinced that this is only too true.
There is one other point on which I am convinced, and that is that these people cannot
give us any of their technology unless we are prepared to work it out from scratch.
They might give us hints and clues, and confirm when we are on the right track, but I
think outright instruction is out, mainly because of semantics.
I find my best method of work to be; work out the basic principles as well as I can,
making my own terminology as I go along, and then when opportunity comes, check
it with the saucer people. I am then 'coded' to pass the information, and I soon find out
if I am right or wrong and where. I have already been set back on the rails several
times.
In a general sense, these are the points I feel are fairly well established. Space people
from a number of alien planets are in the vicinity of the earth. Physically, they
resemble us quite closely, and are probably of the same basic human stock.
Something is about to happen which will be quite serious for the human race of the
earth, and probably will have serious repercussions throughout the solar system. The
space people intend to minimize the damage and ensure that our race does not perish.
That we are rather primitive compared with other races, and under normal
circumstances would be left to our own devices to grow up as best we could, but
because of some impending crisis, they must now interfere in our affairs, but they
intend to keep such interference to an absolute minimum. Beyond this I feel we have
little but conjecture to go on and I want to extend our information as far as possible by
the cross check method which I proposed above. As I suppose you have gathered, I do
not have too much confidence in the detail given by any one contact for the semantic
reasons given.

Communication with the aliens

Verbatim extracts from the Smith archive
It is my opinion that the people from elsewhere choose all sorts of methods to make
contact with us, and their technology and understanding being much better than ours,
they can use methods which we find quite incomprehensible. Most of the Contacts of
whom I have knowledge are "mental" in one form or another, directly or indirectly,
but they do seem to range through almost all sorts of means, right down to personal
face-to-face contact.
So far I have not enjoyed a direct contact with these people, all my contacts being
through some intermediate means or person. The boys topside have advised me that in
my case there is a definite reason for this but don't elaborate. I am also told that there
are quite a few contacts being made.
I have never met any of these people from elsewhere myself face to face, although
several of my friends have, and I have confidence in their veracity. I have
communicated with them by radio and by "tensor beam", and indirectly through
contacts, and I can honestly say that I am as well acquainted with some of these
people from outside as I am with people with whom I work at my office. There is no
doubt in my mind as to their existence or that they are what they say they are.
I have spent too many hours conversing with people from elsewhere to have any
doubts about their reality or that they are what they claim to be. Those of us who have
been fortunate enough to have made contact with these people have learned a great
deal, and profited greatly through this knowledge, in those things which really count,
which we can take with us.
I regret that I am not at liberty to give information regarding people who are contacts
as they have expressed a wish to remain completely anonymous, and since I
appreciate their views and the reasons behind them, I feel that I must respect these
wishes. All I can say is that there are many who are contacts, some sporadically and
some continuously. There are probably several among your close friends. I knew one
man for about a year before I found that he was a contact.
There is one point which I think we all should bear in mind at all times when
assessing these communications. I am convinced that the majority of them are
genuine, but subject to a fundamental lack of precision in semantics. By this I mean
that most of the people from other worlds use direct thought communications, which
in itself is quite precise, but when they have anything to do with us they must work
through a language.
I think you might be a bit hasty in dismissing “telepathic” communication with these
people from elsewhere, since I know that the system they use does resemble telepathy
to some extent, but it actually is electrical, even though they have cut out most of the
intervening equipment such as microphones, earphones, vocal cords etc. I have
generated this energy in the lab, but I am not smart enough to do anything with it; I
only know that it exists, and the boys from topside admit that it is what they use.
We are at the present time investigating a type of radio transmission which we were
told about and which seems to have the most fantastic properties. It is capable of
mental direction. Of course we are still in kindergarten but I think we can learn. I
hope to be able to set up a circuit between Ottawa and Tijeras, New Mexico.
The tensor beam I have found to be quite unmanageable. I can generate it OK but
can't make it do much for me. You see, it is identical with the energies associated with
the life functions in the human body and accordingly can be incorporated and directed
with them, by mental control, by experts! I hope someday to be able to do it, but I am
informed that it takes at least 10 years of concentrated training for the experts to learn
how to do it. The coil doesn't work as well on a receiver as an antenna, but any ferrite
core with a coil on it can convert the doughnut waves into RF, when both the
equipment and the operator are properly adjusted, and this latter I cannot tell you how
to do; it is something one must find out for oneself, like wriggling the ears, I guess.
However, once established, the circuit locks itself on and stays put as long as you
want it.
Furthermore, we have mistakenly drawn a heavy veil between our spiritual world and
our physical world, and there are even many to whom the spiritual world is something
vague to be mentioned only on Sunday. I understand from the people from elsewhere
that such is not generally the case with them. For many of them there is no real veil
between the physical and the spiritual, and communication and participation between
the two is quite the normal thing.
I have learned a great deal, but I am as a small child attempting to assimilate a college
course. Believe me, I have been shown glimpses of a philosophy and technology
almost beyond comprehension. Nor am I alone as there are quite a few people who
have gained the confidence of these beings and are being instructed.
I have witnessed telekinesis in several forms, and have done a little scientific
speculation as to its modus operandi. This force is not at all “supernatural” and is
most probably due to a mental manipulation of the sequence-probability-intention
vectors, though I am not at all clear on some of the intervening steps.
The boys topside make extensive use of significant events for all sorts of purposes
including communications. I am also told that they navigate their ships by what we
would call astrology. They also make use of a type of energy which we do not
understand, "Tensor energy, or Beam" which is space-time independent, for all their
menial tasks and communications. I am informed that ours is by no means the first
civilization which has existed on this planet. There have been many others, and even
some of the souls at present incarnated here participated in these previous
experiments. There exists in very inconspicuous places in several museums, artifacts
which represent a culture at least as high as ours, and which existed during the coal
age!
I am pleased to note that you are looking into the reincarnation aspect as a means of
getting a better perspective of the Divine Plan. Sometimes the data turned up is a bit
of a shock, when one realizes one’s own past!
In collaboration with one of our group, a psychologist and hypnotist, I tried some
regression experiments trying to get back into some previous lifetime where gravity
control was understood. But I slipped right out of space, time, and reality as we know
it! It was a most interesting experience and I wish I could remember all of it.
However, I did send back messages which, when analyzed proved most enlightening.
They definitely confirmed what we had been told by the people from elsewhere was
the real structure of the Universe. It is an idea by the Creator, and when viewed from
the outside does not have even the substance of a shadow! When I returned to this
reality it was way back in what seemed to be spoken Sanscrit, at least that is what the
experts say it is, and from thence to the present. I don’t remember directly.

http://www.rexresearch.com/smith/newsci~1.htm

http://www.treurniet.ca/Smith/ArchiveIndex.html