Index
Part 0
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
The Causes of the Viking Age
Timeline
The Origins of the Vikings
The Scandinavian Environment
Scandinavia Before the Vikings
Pagan Religion and Burial
Scandinavia in the Viking Age
From Chiefdoms to Kingdoms
Rural Settlement
Trade and Trade Routes
Ships and Seafaring
Viking Towns
Women in the Viking Age
The Viking Raids
The Raids Begin
The Vikings in the Mediterranean
The Franks Fight Back
The Great Army in England
The Great Raids on Francia
Wessex Defended
The Conquest of the Danelaw
The Kingdom of York
Vikings in Ireland 1.
Vikings in Ireland II.
The Vikings in Scotland
Scandinavian Placenames in Britain
The Duchy of Normandy
The Vikings in Britany
The Viking Warrior
The North Atlantic Saga
The Faeroes and Iceland
The Settlement of Iceland
Icelandic Literature
The Vikings in Greenland
Voyages to Vinland
The Vikings in the East
The Swedes in the East
From Scandinavian to Slav
The Transformation of the Vikings
Raids on the Aethelraed’s Kingdom
The Danes Conquer England
The Empire of Cnut
The Thunderbolt of the North
The Struggle for England
The Kingdom of Man and the Isles
TheTwillight of Viking Scotland
Scandinavia After the Vikings
The Early Scandinavian Church
Viking Kings and Rulers
Further Reading
Index
Acknowledgements
Back cover
=
OA rh oO
bh
bo bo
A
bt
Ned
&
BRESSREBSRARNSARBRAHSRHLHKEBS SS
100
106
108
110
118
120
122
124
124
128
130
132
134
136
138
139
144
145PENGUIN BOOKS
Published by the Penguin Group
Penguin Books Ltd, 27 Wrights Lane, London W8 5TZ, England
Penguin Putnam Inc., 375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014, USA
Penguin Books Australia Ltd, Ringwood, Victoria, Australia
Penguin Books Canada Ltd, 10 Alcor Avenue, Toronto. Ontario. Canada M4V 3B2
Penguin Books (NZ) Ltd, 182-190 Wairau Road, Auckland 10, New Zealand
Penguin Books Ltd, Registered Offices: Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England
First published 1995
Published simultaneously by Viking
57910864
Text copyright © John Haywood, 1995
Design and maps copyright © Swanston Publishing Limited, 1995
All rights reserved
The moral right of the author has been asserted
Printed and bound in Great Britain by The Bath Press, Avon
Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject
to the condition that it shail not. by way of trade or otherwise, be lent,
re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's
prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in
which it is published and without 6 similar condition including
this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser
ISBN 0-14-0-51328-0The Causes of the Viking Age
The Vikings burst quite suddenly into European history in the last
decade of the 8th century with a series of terrifying attacks on the
coasts of Britain, lreland and Francia. For centuries, their
Scandinavian homeland had been a remote region about which
other Europeans knew little and cared less. Why then, after
centuries of obscurity, did the Scandinavians take to the seas to
make such a dramatic impact on the world?
At the time of the first Viking raids, strong rulers such as the Frankish
Emperor Charlemagne and King Offa of Mercia had brought western
Europe a level of peace and prosperity it had mot enjoyed since the fall
of the Roman Empire. Ports, towns and monasteries were unc
ed. The unexpected attacks of these Scandinavian pirates we
shocking, the more so as the Vikings were pagans and recognized
end-
none of the accepted taboos that protected the proper ty and person=
nel of t in times of war between Christians. The mobility
of their fast, seaworthy ships made the Viking attacks doubly terrify-
ir
hure
as they could strike almost without warning anywhere on the
coast or on navigable rivers. The first raiders attacked c al com-
munities and monasteries to acquire portable wealth and captives
for ransom or the slave mar’! s. Later, conquest and settlement
me more important motives for Viking attacks. The period of
Viking activity lasted about 300 years, from roughly 789 to 1100. In
that time the Vikings played a decisive role in the development of
much of western and eastern
formed from pagan barbarians to Christian Europeans.
be
irope, and were themselves trans-
Abov
Nesaadléongy wi
in the centuries
to the Viking Age, "The geographical range of Viking activity was enormous, spanning most of
Scandinavia was ruled by the known world and going some way beyond it. V
warrior aristocrats whose i ve. -
pater and status depended on whole coastline of western Europe, and even North Af
were not secure from attack. In the t the V
t rivers of Russia to cross the Black Sea and th
Se re ee 10ple and the Abbasid ( . Vikings settle ely
iron helmet froma 7th. in the British Isles, Normandy and, to a lesser extent, in Russia but they also
centery ship: burial at Vendel, pushed at the limits of the known world, crossing the North Adantic to set-
ee in the uninhabited Facroe Islands, Iceland and Greenland and to discov
er, but fail to settle, North America. Viking traders and hunters extended
the limits of the known world even further, sailing far into the Arctic waters
of the White Sea and exploring the west coast of Greenland as far north as
Melville Bay in search of walrus ivory and hides, Faced with this far-flung
activity itis all too « Scandinavia itself was also the scene of
tt deal of Viking raiding and piracy. The Viking expansion was in no
pandinavian campaign ag tof the world: V
quite happy to plunder their own k f the opportunity arose.
ng raids affected the
1 the Medi-
ings sailed down
Caspian Sea to
war and plunder, Their
prestige was enhanced by
iph exten
y to forget thi
a gr
way
ast the r
sl ings were
The term “Viking” has come to be applied to all Scandi
od, but in the Viking age itself the term vikingr
who went f viking, that is plundering. In this sense, most Vi
dinavians were not ings at all, but peaceful farmers and cr
stayed qu all their lives, For many others, being 3
just an occupation they resorted to for long enough to nais
ivians of the ¢
yplied only to sot
g-age Scan-
fismen who
5 was
€ money to
ly at homebuy, or otherwise acquire, a farm and settle down. Nor were those who went
viking necessarily exclusively Scandinavian: Irishmen, Anglo-Saxons, Franks,
Bretons and Slavs all joined in Viking raids at times. Though it has led to
unneccessary controversy on some important aspects of the history of the
Viking age (the question of Viking violence, for example), the wider use of
“Viking” is too well established to insist on using the word only in the narrow
meaning of “pirate”.
The Wrath of God
The Vikings’ victims had little difficulty explaining the raids: they were God's
punishment on a sinful people. Archbishop Wulfstan of York expressed this
view eloquently in his Sermon of the Wolf to the English, written after Svein
Forkbeard’s victory over the English in 1014: “Things have not gone well now
for a long time at home or abroad, but there has been devastation and perse-
cution in every district again and again, and the English have been for a long
time now completely defeated and too greatly disheartened through God's
anger; and the pirates so strong with God's consent that often in battle one
puts to flight ten, and sometimes less, sometimes more, all because of our
sins ... what else is there in all these events except God’s anger clear and visi-
ble over his people?” (tr. D. Whitelock, English Historical Documents I, Oxford
1979).
Modern historians have found the Viking age harder to explain. Land-
hunger caused by a growing population has often been proposed as a cause
of the Viking expansion. The population of Scandinavia certainly was rising
in the centuries before the first raids, and it continued to do so during and
after the Viking age. The area under cultivation was expanding, new settle-
ments were created and iron production increased to meet the demand for
tools. Scandinavia has relatively litte good arable land and it might be
expected that the pressure of a rising population would soon be felt. Norway
has not been self-sufficient in food since the Middle Ages, and both Norway
and Sweden have seen considerable emigration in periods of population
growth in recent historical times. There is evidence of migrations out of
Scandinavia before the Viking age. The Cimbri and Teutones who invaded
the Roman Empire in 113 Bc probably originated in Judand, while many of
the Germanic peoples—including the Goths, Burgundians and Vandals—
who invaded the Roman Empire in the 5th century Ap had traditions that
they had originally lived in Scandinavia. To the 6th-century Gothic historian
Jordanes, Scandinavia was the “womb of peoples”. There was also consider-
able emigration out of Scandinavia during the Viking age, and it may be sig-
nificant that the earliest Scandinavian setwements, dating from the early to
mid-9th century, were made by Norwegians in the northern and western isles
of Scouland and the Faeroe islands.
But the first wave of Vikings was dominated by raiders, not settlers—more
than 80 years passed before any major settlements were made. Iceland was
only settled in 870s, and the Danish settlement of eastern England began
around the same time. Norwegians did not begin to settle in northwest
England until around 900, and the Danish settlement of Normandy dates
from 911, Despite the intensity of Viking raiding in Ireland, there were never
any extensive Scandinavian settlements there, while the Rus (Swedes) who
ruled in eastern Europe were a small warrior-elite; their subjects remained
overwhelmingly Slav. Land-hunger, then, can hardly have been the main
cause of the Viking expansion—it is more likely that it was the success of theAbove: This bronze statnette
of the Buddha samebour found
Tram northern ladia to
Helgd in Sweden in the 6th or
7th century an. Finds like this
are evidence that the
Scandinavians already had
wide-ranging trade contacts
before the Viking age.
its a
\
woithicks thatopened the way for Scandinavian seqdement
Another reason put forward for the Viking explosion is $
building. The 8th century, it has been argued, saw the S ns per-
fect the technology of the scagoiny sailing ship: before this time they had
relied on large rowing boats which, while suitable for piracy in sheltered
coastal waters, were inadequate lor long-distance raiding. The adoption of
the sail, therefore, opened up enormous new opportunities for piracy which
the Scandinavians were quick to exploit. It is true that without seaworthy
ships the Viking expansion could mot have happened, but this is not the
thing as demonstrating that they were a cause of it, Though no pre-
Viking ship yet discovered in Scandinavia has provided any evidence of the
use of the sail, late 7th-cent from the Baltic is
Gotland do show sailing ships, as does a recently discovered 7th-century
stone carving from juthind. Mis therefore possible that the Scandinavians
had suitable ships fur some time before the start of Viking raiding.
andin pletely unknown
before the Viking aye, the earliest recorded one being a raid of the Heruls
(from Jutland) on the lower Rhine
andinavian ship-
‘ancl
san
ry stone carving:
Moreover, sea-raids out of S$ ao were not co
Traders and Raiders
Adnore important fictor in the Viking expansion was probably trade: it is
certainly the most convincing explanation of the or
ns of the Swedish
expansion to the east, The 8th century was a time of political stability in
western Europe. The resulting economic recovery led to an increase in
trade with Scandinavia, which was an important source of luxury goods
such as fi umber and walrus ivory, and probably of more mundane prod-
ucts such as hides. By the mid Sth century the Swedes had already be
establish themselves in settlements such as Star
Wn 1
“S
ja Ladoga, cast of the Baltic.
These are best explained as bases for the collec tion of tribute in furs, which
the Swedes could then use to supply the western European market. At about
the Salrtit: lime, Arab mh ants were penetrating enster
south along the Volga and the Don. As a result, high qual
coins known as dirkems began to circulate in eastern Europe, giving the
an incentive to push further east to tap direcudy into a new and
ve mmurket.
ALP] from the
ve silver
The existence of piracy implies the presence of sometl
ing, so the increase in tade with western Europe may also have encouraged
ag worth phunder-
Es
Viking raiding. Viking piracy, preying on merchant ships, may have been
endemic in ihe long before it spilled over into the North Sea.
in the we! m to have known which plac
ful merchant voyages that the
Seandinavians first learned about western Europe's rich and unguarded
ports and coastal monasteries. The Scandinavians were certainly known to
the Anglo-Saxons and Franks before they began raiding; according to the
Northumbrian scholar Alcuin, writing after the sack of Lindisfarne in 793,
attack, ‘and it was probably on peac
his countrymen were so familiar with them that they had even adopted their
The circumstances of another aid, on Portland
so suggests that the Anglo-Saxons were already
Seandinavian merchants, Three ships from Horthaland (in Norway) arrived
at the port. The king's reeve Beaduheard, believing them to be merchants,
ordered the crews to go to the royal residence at Dorchester: Beaduheard
was killed for his trouble. Small-scale pirate raids like this continued to prey
on comstal seulement and merc
iliar with
nt shipping until the 12th cenurry,Rivals and Exiles
Many Viking leaders were royal exiles, and this points to another reason for
the Viking expansion, Immediately before and during the Viking age,
Scandinavian society was going through major changes which saw the pro-
gressive centralization of power in fewer and fewer hands. However,
Scandinavian society had a relatively numerous class of men who, through
the possession of royal blood, could aspire to kingship. Competition for
power was intense, and succession disputes were frequent and bloody. For
the losers in these struggles, there was little choice but to go into exile.
Some of these exiles, like Olaf Tryggvason in the 10th century, went raiding
to build up their wealth and reputation. This would gain them a following
of warriors, who would support a bid for power at home. Even the great
Cnut was successful abroad before he won power in Denmark.
Others, like Erik Bloodaxe, may have decided that if they could not rule at
home, they would rule abroad. Erik, driven off the Norwegian throne by his
brother, sought a kingdom overseas in compensation, establishing himself
as the King of York in 948. Ivar, Halfdan and the other leaders of the Great
Army that invaded England in 865 seem to have been intent on establishing
overseas kingdoms from the start of their careers. The Danish King Svein
Forkbeard was an example of another kind of leader. Recognizing the
threat successful Vikings could pose to his own position, he led his own
plundering raids to overawe potential rivals with his wealth and military
prowess, As royal power became more entrenched in the 11th century, the
Scandinavian nations evolved into medieval European kingdoms, Their
rulers could depend on reliable institutionalized sources of wealth-gather-
ing, such as taxes and tolls, and the importance of plunder as a means of
buying support declined. There was no longer such a strong incentive to go
raiding, and the Viking age faded away.
Right: This silver coin was
struck at the Channel port of
Quentovic during the reign
of the Frankish Emperor
Charlemagne (769-814).
The trading ship int the
design reflects the growing
commercial prosperity of
western Europe at the time,
By the end of the 8th century
the rich pickings were
encouraging the
Scandinavians to turn to
piracy.Timeline: AD 1—824
BRITAIN AND
SCANDINAVIA IRELAND
¢c AD 1-400 warrior
aristocracy emerges in
southern Scandinavia
ce. 400-600 forts built at
Eketorp and Ismantorp on
Oland. Angles and Jutes
migrate to Britain
¢, 425-500 Saxons migrate to
Britain
¢, 550 Gothic writer Jordanes
records locations of
Scandinavian peoples
597 St Augustine begins
conversion of Anglo-Saxons
c. 600-800 kingdoms develop
in Denmark, Norway and
Sweden
635 St Aidan founds
monastery on Lindisfarne
664 Synod of Whitby ensures
dominance of Roman church
in England
c. 700 ship burial at Vendel
« 720 Angantyr king of
Denmark
c. 725 Willibrord leads the
first Christian mission to
Scandinavia
726 military canal built at
Kanhave, Denmark
737 First phase of Danevirke
rampart completed
« 789 Norwegian Vikings
attack Portland
793 Vikings plunder
monastery of Lindisfarne
795 First recorded Viking
raids on Scotland and Ireland
808 Godfred king of the
Danes destroys Slay town of
Reric and transfers
merchants to Hedeby.
Danevirke extended
810 Godfred murdered
815 Danish kings campaign to
re-establish their authority in
Vestfold, Norway
823-4 Ebo, archbishop of
Reims, makes mission to
Denmark
WESTERN
EUROPE THE EAST
6 455 & 460 Heruls raid
Spain
¢. 528 Hygelac king of the
Geats raids Frisia and the
Rhine
«570 Danes raid Frisia
c. 750 Swedes established at
Staraja Ladoga
799 Vikings raid Aquitaine
800 Charlemagne organizes
defences against Vikings
810 King Godtred raids Frisia
WORLD
EVENTS
410 Visigoths sack Rome.
Emperor Honoris tells
Britons to fend for themselves
4176 fall of Roman Empire in
west
482 Clovis king of Franks
511 Clovis dies; Frankish
kingdom divided
535 Byzantine reconquest of
Italy begins
622 Mohammed's flight
(hijra) from Mecca begins
Muslim era
642 Muslims conquer Egypt
711 Muslims begin conquest
of Spain
732 Frankish King Charles
Martel halts Muslim advance
near Poitiers
750 Umayyad Caliphate
overthrown by Abassid
dynasty; Umayyad exiles take
over Spain
800 Charlemagne crowned
emperor in Rome
814 death of Charlemagne;
succeeded by Louis the PiousAD 825-906
BRITAIN AND
IRELAND
¢. 825 Irish monks driven
out of Faeroes by Vikings
SCANDINAVIA
¢ 825 Danish coinage in
Hedeby begins
826 Danish King Harald Klak
baptized at Mainz. Ansgar’s
first mission to Denmark
§29-30 Ansgar’s first mission
to the Svear at Birka
832 Armagh raided three
times in one month
839-40 Vikings winter in
Ireland for the first time
841 Viking base established
at Dublin
850 Ansgar builds churches
at Ribe and Hedeby
8524 Ansgar’s second
mission to the Svear
854 Horik, king of Denmark,
killed in civil war
850 Vikings winter for the
first time in England
« 860 Gardar the Swede
explores coast of Iceland
865 Danish Great Army
invades England
867 Danes capture York
870 Danes conquer East
Anglia
«. 870-930 Vikings settle é, 870 Earldom of Orkney
Iceland established
871-99 Alfred king of Wessex
874-914 “Forty Years Rest” in
Ireland
876-9 initial Danish ~
settlement in England
878 Alfred defeats Danes at
Edington.
Treaty of Wedmore
establishes Danelaw
¢. 885-900 Harald Finehair
wins the battle of Hafrsfjord
uniting most of Norway under
his rule
886 London recaptured from
Danes
c. 900 Norwegian settlement
in northwest England
902 Vikings expelled from
Dublin
902-54 West Saxon conquest
of Danclaw
WESTERN
EUROPE THE EAST
834-7 Dorestad raided
annually
839 Swedes reach
Constantinople
842 Vikings winter in Francia
for the first ime
843-85 Frisia under
intermittent Danish control
844 First Viking raid on
Spain
845 Hamburg and Paris
sacked, First Danegeld paid by
Franks
859-62 Bjorn Ironsides and
Hastein raid in
Mediterranean
860 Rus attack
Constantinople for the first
time
c. 862 Charles the Bald
orders construction of
fortified bridges against
Vikings
Novgorod. Askold and Dir
seize Kiey
¢. 882 Oleg unites Novgorod
and Kiev
885-6 Vikings besiege Paris
891 Vikings defeated by
Arnulf at the Dyle
¢. 862 Rurik becomes ruler of
WORLD
EVENTS
827 Muslims invade Sicily
830-4 civil war in Carolingian
empire
843 Carolingian empire
partitioned
846 Muslim pirates sack
Vatican
¢. 850 Spanish Christians
push Muslims back to
R. Duero
« 863 Byzantine missionaries
Cyril and Methodius sent to
convert Slavs. Schism between
Orthodox and western
churches
888 Final breakup of the
Carolingian empire. Odo
king of West Franks, Arnulf
king of East
c. 900 revival of Byzantine
power in Turkey and the
BalkansTimeline: AD 907—1024
SCANDINAVIA
930 Icelandic Althing
founded
934 Danes defeated by Henry
the Fowler, king of Germany
948 bishops appointed to
Ribe, Hedeby and Arhus
958 death of Gorm the Old
960 Harald Bluetooth
restores Danish dominance in
Norway
¢. 965 Harald converts Danes
to Christianity
968 Danevirke refortified
against German invasion
« 970 Sigtuna founded
974-81 Hedeby under
German occupation
c. 980 round forts built in
Denmark
986 Erik the Red begins
settlement of Greenland
995 Olaf Tryggvason unites
Norway. Olof Skétkonung
becomes first king of both
Svear and Gétar
1000 conversion of Iceland.
Olaf Tryggvason killed at
battle of Svéld
c. 1000 voyages to Vinland
1015 Olaf Haraldsson
conquers Norway
1027 first stone church in
Denmark built at Roskilde
10380 Olaf Haraldsson killed
at battle of Stiklestad. He is
soon regarded as a saint
BRITAIN AND
IRELAND
WESTERN
EUROPE
911 Rollo founds Normandy
914-36 Vikings occupy
Brittany
917 Vikings recapture Dublin
937 English defeat Norse-
Scottish alliance at battle of
Brunanburh
954 Erik Bloodaxe killed at
Stainmore: end of Viking
kingdom of York
980 Viking raids on England
recommence :
991 Olaf Tryggvason defeats
English at Maldon
1002 Svein Forkbeard uses
Normandy as base to attack
England
1014 Brian Boru defeats
alliance of Leinster and Norse
at Clontarf.
Svein Forkbeard conquers
England
1016-35 Cnut king of England
c. 1080-5 battle of Tarbet
Ness: Earl Thorfinn of
Orkney wins control over
most of northern Scotland
1042 end of Danish rule in
England
THE EAST
907 Rus attack
Constantinople
911 Rus make treaty with
Byzantines
912-13 Viking raiders in
Caspian Sea
941 Igor unsuccessfully
beseiges Constantinople and
makes treaty, Rus becoming
assimilated into Slavic
population
964-71 Svyatoslay campaigns
against Bulgars, Khazars and
Byzantines
¢. 980 Varangian guard
formed at Constantinople
988 Vladimir, prince of Kiev,
converts to Orthodox
Christianity
1019-54 zenith of Kievan
power
1041 Ingvar the Widefarer's
expedition to the east
WORLD
EVENTS
936-73 Otto the Great
emperor of Germany
941 Hugh Capet King of
France
c. 965 Muslim silver mines
exhausted
978 war between East and
West Franks, Athelrad king
of England (to 1016)
1002 Muslim Caliphate of
Cordoba collapses into petty
states
1042-66 Edward the
Confessor king of EnglandAD 1043-1500
SCANDINAVIA
1043 Magnus the Good
defeats Wends at battle of
Lyrskov Heath near Hedeby
1047-64 conflict between
Harald Hardrada of Norway
and Svein Estrithson of
Denmark
1085 oldest known grant of
land to the church in
Scandinavia. Cnut IV
abandons planned expedition
to England
1107-11 Norwegian king
Sigurd the Jerusalem-farer
leads crusade to Holy Land
1122-33 Ari Thorgilsson
writes Islendingabok (the
Book of the Icelanders)
1147 Danes attack pagan
Wends as part of Second
Crusade
1155-70 civil wars in
Scandinavia
1163 first coronation in
Scandinavia: Magnus
Erlingsson crowned king of
Norway
1169 Danes conquer Rigen
Island and begin expansion
into Baltic
1261 Greenland comes under
direct rule from Norway
1263 Iceland comes under
Norwegian rule
134] Eskimos occupy
Western Setidement,
Greenland
1380 Eskimos occupy Middle
Settlement, Greenland
late 15th century last Norse
Greenland colony becomes
extinct
BRITAIN AND
IRELAND
«1050 bishopric founded in
Orkney
1066 Harald Hardrada killed
at Stamford Bridge. Battle of
Hastings
1069 Svein Estrithson invades
England
1075 last Danish invasion of
England
1079 battle of Skyhill, Isle of
Man: Godred Crovan unites
Man and Hebrides
1095 Malcolm Canmore, king
of Scotland, recognizes
Norwegian sovereignty over
Hebrides
1103 Magnus Barelegs, king
of Norway, killed raiding
Ulster
1153 King Harald Eystein
raids east coast of England
from Norway
1156 Somerled wins southern
Hebrides from Godred H of
Man
1170 Anglo-Normans conquer
Dublin
1263 Scots defeat Hakon IV
at Largs
1266 Norway cedes Man and
Hebrides to Scotland
1469 Denmark cedes Orkney
and Shetland to Scotland
WESTERN
EUROPE THE EAST
1048 last Rus attack on
Constantinople
1071 Normans expand into
southern Italy
1271 end of Rurik dynasty in
Rus
WORLD
EVENTS
1055 Seljuk Turks take
Baghdad
1071 Seljuks defeat
Byzantines at Manzikert
1085 King Alfonso T of Leon
takes Toledo from Muslims
1095-95 First Crusade
1147-8 Second Crusade
1155 Frederick Barbarossa
crowned emperor
1187 Saladin takes Jersualem
1204 Fourth Crusade takes
Constantinople
1237-42 Mongols invade
eastern Europe
1337 outbreak of Hundred
Years War between England
and France
1347 Black Death in Europe
1458 Ottoman Turks take
Constantinople. End of
Hundred Years WarI: The Origins of the Vikings
Below: The circular stone fort
of Griborg is the langest of
mary built on Oland during
the Migration Period, a time
of intense competition
between ritual eli
fort wes pressed into service
again in the late Vik jad
asa refuge against Wendisl
pirates,
The Vikings’ way of life was shaped by their Scandinavian
5 ) J
homeland. Its harsh environment, seafaring tradition and the
i
power struggles between rival warlords led the Scandinavians to
plunder their richer neighbours to the south.
The homeland of the Vik
tics: Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Scandinavia is a vast region stretching
some 1200 miles (2000km) from the neck of the Jutland peninsula in the
south to North Cape well beyond the Arctic Circle. Only in the far north
and south does Scandinavia lack clearly defined borders. In the north
Scandinavia me
was the three modern Scandinavian coun-
es seamlessly into the tundras of north Russia,
Scandinavia's short southern land frontier across the neck of the Jutland
has always been hard to define, and its present position dates only from
1920. However, southern Jutland has extensive areas of infertile soils and
until the advent of modern
area which acted
icultural methods it was a sparsely populated
as a natural buffer zone between the German peoples to
the south and the Scandinavians to the north.
Southern Scandinavia—Juuvand, the Danish islands and Sweden south of
the Southern Uplands—is essentially a low-lying extension of the north
European plain, Though there are large areas of infertile sands deposited
by rivers of meltwater from ice sheets during the |
the best soils in Scandin:
at has
Iee Age, this
ia. Though rarely rising above 1000 feet (300m),
the Swedish Southern Uplands, an area of lakes, bogs and dense forest,
a significant obstacle to travel and formed a natural ba
the Danes and the Swedes until the 17th century.
wel
er betweenNorway, on the west of the Scandinavian peninsula, is completely dominat-
ed by along range of ancient fold mountains known in Viking times as “The
Keel", These rise steeply from the sea in the west and decline gradually in
the southeast to the Gulf of Bothnia and the lowlands around Lake Vanern
and Lake Milaren in Sweden, The west coast is indented with deep fjords,
some of which penetrate over a hundred miles inland, Off the coast are
chains of islands and reefs, the Skerry Guard, which form a sheltcred coastal
passage for shipping. This sca route to the north, the “North Way”, gave
Norway its name. During the Ice Age the Scandinavian peninsula was very
heavily glaciated, and the landscape of Norway and northern Sweden has
been scoured by ice. Soils are generally thin, stoney, waterlogged and infer-
tile: only in the Trondelag, around Oslo Fjord and the plains around Lake
Vanern and Lake Malaren are there extensive areas of fertile soils. During
the Ice Age, the weight of the Scandinavian ice cap depressed the land sur-
face. Since the ice cap melted at the end of the Ice Age, the land—relieved
of the huge weight of ice—has been steadily rising. As a result, the coastline
has receded since Viking times. This is most evident in central Sweden: in
Viking times Lake Malaren was an inlet of the sea offering easy access to the
interior. The relative fall in sea level was a contributory factor in the decline
of some Viking age ports and trade centres such as Birka on Lake Malaren
and Kaupang on Oslo Fjord, which gradually became more and more diffi-
cult to reach by ship,
Climate and Agriculture
The climate of Scandinavia is maritime in the west and continental in the
east. Because of the moderating influence of the Gulf Stream the
Norwegian coast has cool summers and, for its latitude, mile winters, [tis a
poor climate for growing grain, but agriculture based on pastoralism is pos-
sible even in the Lofoten Islands over 120 miles (192km) north of the Arctic
Circle. Norwegian waters remain ice free throughout the year. Inland the
climate deteriorates rapidly and winters in the mountains are severe, with
heavy snowfalls. However, the mountains were an important source of sum-
mer grazing and of bog-iron ore. Most of Sweden lies in the rain shadow of
the Norwegian mountains, and the climate is much drier, Summers are
warm and sunny, but Sweden's remoteness from the warming influence of
the Gulf Stream means that winters can be severe, and sea ice can close the
Baltic to shipping for several weeks or even months cach year. The climate
of Denmark and southernmost Sweden shows both maritime and continen-
tal influences, with moderate rainfall, warm summers and cold but not
severe winters. The climate is well suited to pastoral and arable farming
which, combined with the best soils in Scandinavia, has always made
Denmark and southern Sweden the richest farming region in Scandinavia.
The geography of Scandinavia has always exerted an influence on its histori-
cal development, most obviously in the field of communications.
Mountains, forests and bogs have always made overland travel difficult in
the Scandinavian peninsula: most long-distance overland travel took place
in the winter when the ground was frozen hard, However, Scandinavia is
well provided with sheltered coastal waters, fjords, lakes and navigable
rivers; from the Stone Age, boats and ships became the most important
means of transport, so the Vikings were heirs to a long tradition of seafaring
and shipbuilding, The poverty of the soils in much of Scandinavia added
another incentive for seafaring as fishing, seal and walrus hunting and wade
all offered attractive alternatives, or at least supplements, to a hard living onAbove: The importance of
ipa and the sea is evident
throughout Scandinavian
Prehistoric art, religion and
ieftains
were frequently buried in
burial customs, C
ships, or within an enclosure
of stones arranged to form the
outline of a alip, as in this
Bronze Age burial in Gotland,
the land. The shortage of good soils t
have led to lind hunger at times of population
Volso
growth, and bred a willingness to cimigrate,
The nature of the Land also had a great effect on
the political development of Scandinavig
do sea were casi-
Communication by both land
est in Denmark and southern Sweden. This
region had the best soils and climate, so it could
tion. As a result, it was
support the densest popu
the first arca of Scandinavia to see the formation
of a unified state; this explains why Denmark, in
spite of its small size, remained the leading
Seandinavian kingdom until the 17th century.
Norway by contrast has a highly fr
graphy which naturally lends itself to the forma-
tion of strong local identities. The two lar
areas of good farming land, and hence the
wealthiest and most densely populated parts of
Norway, were the Trondelag and the Oslo Fjord
region, Since they lely sepa
developed as rival power centres, delaying the
unification of the country.
mented peo-
st
ed, they
‘he Early Scandinavians
The first human inhabitants of Scandinavia were
nomadic hunters who followed the seasonal 1
veross what was then the north German tundra into southern Scandinavia at
the heig
ment in
grations of reindeer herds
ht ofthe last glaciation around 11,000 ne. Permanent human settle-
naround S000 years ago as bands of hunter-gath-
erers moved north in the wake of the retreating ice sheets. These bands
indinavia be;
5B
moved between semi-permanent camps every few months to exploit a wide
range of seasonal animal and plant foods. There is no convincing evidence
of any later migrations into Scandinavia, so it seems likely that the Vikings
¢ the direct descendants of these hunter-gatherers. Around 4000 pe the
early Scandinavians adopted
agriculture, probably as a result of contacts
with farmi
peoples to the south. Around 2000 ne flint tools began to be
replaced by bronze, and iron tools began to appear « 500 pe. The Stone
Age (Neolithic) farmers lived in isolated family farms, but impressive meg
lithic communal tombs s
tity. By the Bronze Age, in the r
ning to cluster together in vill
among otherwise smaller dwelli
1d as monuments to some sort of common iden-
ore fertile areas at least, farms were beg
es. The presence of a single large dwelling
ests that villages were dominated by
S$ sug
a heads
nor chief. Small numbers of richly furnished graves also point to
ce of a ruling class in Bronze-Age Scandinavia. This process of
the em
social stratification continued throughout the Scandinavian Iron
> (¢ 500 bc —-Ap 1000),
Increasit
The beginning of the Early Iron A
marked by a decline in populatio
tion, but the population was
would continue to do so throughout the remainder of the Tron Age, Some
(500 no-ap 1) appears to have been
perhaps caused by climatic deteriora-
rowing again by the end of the period and
of the most important finds of this period are votive offerings of weapons,
cauldrons, pottery and food, as well as several human sacrificial victims,
deposited in bogs and superbly preserved by the acid conditions.Below; Human sacrifice was
common in tron Age
seandinavia, The victims!
ba
offerings te the gods in peat
bogs, where the chemicals in
the gromnd have preserved
thems in remarkable condition,
Tollund nian was found in
Jutland, with the hide rope
used to hang Irina still in place
around his neck,
ies were placed with other
It was in the Roman Iron Age (Ap 1-400) and the succeeding Germanic
y developed its familiar Viking
Tron Age (100-800) that Scandinavian soci
tual absenee of literary sources, it is impos-
charact ics. Because of the
sible to reconstruct the politi
detail, but they
and social chi
m be drawn in outlit
2s of the period in any
on the basis of archaeological evi-
dence and by comparison with the better-documented German peoples to
the south.
In the Roman Iron Age the objects found in votive deposits are almost
exclusively weapons, presumably thank offerings for victory in batde. The
presence, especially in Denmark, of many Roman weapons in these offer-
s that the Scandinavians were often engaged in battle with the
German tribes to the south, who were in direct contact with the Roman
Empire. The increasing importance of war in society is also indicated by the
appearance of warrior g¢ furnished with weapons, suggesting that
Scandinavian society was now dominated by a warrior elite. A smaller num-
ber of graves containing weapons and prestige luxury goods suggests that
this warrior clite included a class of chieftains or, perhaps, petty kings. Finds
of everyday Roman objects like pottery and coins alongside luxury goods
and jewell show that there were direct or indirect
trade links between Scandina ind the Roman world, Seasonal trading
ed with cult centres, such as Lundeborg in Denmark,
sprang up. Finds of Roman goods are, not surprisingly, most common in
southern Scandinavia but they are not evenly distributed: a notable concen-
ings sugge
like glass, silverwar
centres, often assocAbove: The centuries
immediately preceding the
outbreak of Viking raiding
sau great development in
Seandinavian shipbutlding
techniques. This Sth century
carved picture stone front
Gotland shows an early
sailing ship alongside
mythological scenes,
tration in Sjelland suggests that in the late
Reman Iron Age a centralized authority,
probably a kingdom, had developed here with
cnough power to control trade over a wide
areca,
The indirect cause of these soci S wals
probably the Roman infl on the
German tribes to the south. Through a com-
bination of trade, subsidy, plunder and pay-
t for mercenary services, the German
uibes in direct contact with the Romans were
greatly enriched, and this must have made
them an attractive target for raidiy
poorer neighbours to the north. Those who
were most successful in these raids would
by their
soon be t fram the rest of so
y by
ly that
clopment of
lion
engin
their greater wealth and status, [tis li
the Roman fron Age saw the de
the comifatus or war band, an insti
which is well attested among the G
tribes in this period. The comitatus was 1
up of young warriors who became the follow-
ers of a successful chicfain or king. In return
for their loyalty the warriors expected to be
rewarded, and the war band would only stay
together as long as the leader had the w
to reward them, Though a leader could
alth through peaceful means such as landownership or by controlling
trade, military expeditions to win plunder and tribute were usually more
effective. This cre
in war was the key to power and status. It also led to the concentration of
power in fewer and fewer hands and to the merging of tribes, either volun-
tarily to wage wa ssion more effectively, or be a weaker
tribe had been conquere tronger. It was probably in this way, for
example, that the Danes emerged as the dominant people of southern
indinavia by the 6th century,
le
wi
tted a very competitive, predatory society, where success
por re
Scandinavia suffered no invasions fror
tions should be seen as evidence of internal insecurity born of these intense
power struggles. Many of these fortifica tres of
chieftaincies and local kingdoms, There is also evidence of a tendency for
settlement to move away from the coasts, a sign that piracy was ril
Though, no doubt, unre
Seandinavians hold that tl
oubide in this period these fortifica-
ons were probably the ce
ble in detail, the carly historical traditions of the
s was indeed a period of constant conflict
between competing tribes. Though Scandinavia escaped invasion during
the Migration Period, the Jutland wibes of the Angles and Jutes joined the
ms in migrating to Britain in the 5th century. What prompted this
migration is not known, but it is possible that they were under pressure
from hbouring peoples.
The Rise of Kingdoms
The archaeological evidence points to the development of powerful 1
al kingdoms in the Late Germanic Tron Age (600-800), the last period ofthe Scandinavian Iron Age before the Viking age. One such kingdom was
centred in Uppland in Sweden, north of Lake Malaren, around the pagan
cult centre of Gamla Uppsala. Nearby are cemeteries at Vendel and Vals-
garde containing burials with exceptionally rich furnishings, including ships
and fine armour. These were probably cemeteries of the royal dynasty of the
Svear people from whom Sweden would take its name. Jutland was the cen-
tre of another early kingdom, though the evidence here comes from large
scale defence works rather than burials.
In 726, a canal was built through an isthmus on the island of Sams, proba-
bly to regulate shipping and in 737 an earthwork barrier —the Danevirke—
was built across the neck of the Jutland peninsula. (The reason we have
such precise dates is because timbers can be dated by dendrochronology,
the study of their ring patterns), Both were major projects, and whoever
built them must have been able to command labour and resources over a
wide area. At around the same time a trading place at Ribe was founded. All
of these projects were perhaps the responsibility of King Angantyr, who St
Willibrord met on a mission to Jutland in the early 8th century, Angantyr is
described as king of the Danes, but whether this means all of them or just
the Danes in Jutland is uncertain: the latter seems more likely, The rich bur-
ial mounds at Borre and Oseberg in Vestfold suggest the development of an
emergent kingdom in this part of Norway immediately before the Viking
Age. In the course of the Viking age these primitive and precarious states
would be forged into the medieval kingdoms of Denmark, Sweden and
Norway.
Right: The wealth and
splendour of the late
Iron Age Scandinavian
aristocracy is evident
from this jewelled
Vendel-style brooch
from Aker, Norway.The Scandinavian Environment
Two contrasting
Scandinavian landscapes; the
steep, rocky chasm of
Norway's Geiranger Fjord
(right), and the pastoral
landscape of Brendeshaj in
Denmark, with a view across
the Sejera Bugt to Sjacllands
‘Odde (below).
Scandinavia’s history has always been shaped by its landscape,
especially its relationship with the sea.
Despite its northerly latitude idinaviz y mild climate
thanks to the warming Gulf Stre
wet, are mild. Sweden has seve
has a surprisiz
The coastal areas of Norway, though
winters, but warn, dry summers compen-
sate. Agriculture is restricted by the scarcity of suitable soils. Denmark, the
ble land, making the
id most politically advanced of the
smallest country, has the highest proportion of ari
Danes the wealthiest, most numerous
Scandinavians in the Viking a
farmland: around Trondheim in the north and Oslo Fjord in the south
Be
they be
Norwegi
e. Norway has only two extensive areas of
use of the
distance and poor communications between them,
ion of a unified
im kingdom until the 12th century. In times of rapid population
growth, shortage of arable land became serious; the Viking age was just one
me rival power centres, delaying the cre
of many periods in which Scandinavians migrated in search of land to farm.
The sea was an important fact of life. The poverty of the land made fishing
an essential source of food, and the geography of the region meant that it
was often easier to travel by water than by land. Boat-building and seaman-
ship were essential skills, most obviously for the island-dwelling Danes. In
Norway the mountainous terrain and deeply indented coastline made
inland travel arduous; sailing along the sheltered fjords was far quicker and
safer. In Sweden, rivers and lakes offered the best routes into the densely
forested country; long-distance travel overland mainly took place in winter,
when the bogs and rivers were frozen.
The pattern of Viki activity is closely related to the locations of the
Scandinavian peoples. Norwegian expansion was mostly to the west: to
Scotland, Ireland, the Faeroe Islands, Iceland and ultimately to Greenland
and North Ameri
the Baltic to the Rhine, so it is net
a. The Danes’ territory straddled the main sea route from
surprising they first concentrated
on Frisiz
d then spread to
England and Francia. Swedes, cut
off from the western seas by the
Danes and Norwegians, had only
one outlet: east, along the great
rivers that led into the heartlands
of Russia.Lope Ps
Islands os er
warming Gulf Stream @ . Mos
makes pastoral farming ‘\.
possible as far north” —
as Lofoten ngs 5
Meat Te f
=
Aa
ie
is
se
ie
ieee J
we”
2s a *
@ “North Way" Sear foute ¥
through sheltered channels
LRA s ae Sts were ap spor FS a 3 ite
4 ( source o a oy ENG
ing AN,
2
sy o
, Ace
Bundsvall
Wiking-age Sweden,
4 ts fy
cn Gotland its commanding aslo h
i
@ sheltered Limfjord,
main sailing route be
North Sea and Baltic
the Baltic made Goffag
major centre of Viking sg
Oland NY
D
Climate and arable land in
Scandinavia
ees land over 200 metres
[seer] land over 500 metres
land over 1000 metres
(PB) rable soil
__ average January temperature
OC (eastern limit)
average July temperature
15jC (northern limit)
1000mm mean annual rainfall
(eastern limit)Scandinavia Before the Vikings
“Our feud with the
Franks grew worse
when Hygelac
sailed with his fleet
to the shores of
Frisia, Frankish
warriors attached
him there, and
outfought him ...
he jell, surrounded
by his retainers...”
from the 8th-
century Anglo-
Saxon poem
Beowiul/
\/Hygelac’s raid, 528
(One of the earliest recorded
Scandinavian pinate raids
on western Europe was by
Hygelac, a king of the
Danes or the Geats (i.e.
Gotar), c. ap $28. The
raiders were defeated by the
Franks on the lower Rhine,
but they created a lasting
impression as the raid is
recorded in four
independent literary sources
including Gregory of
Tours's 6th-century history
of the Franks and the Sth-
century Anglo-Saxon epic
poem Beowulf,
et éth-century coastline
Danes
Franks
2G bate
The hallmarks of Viking society—trade, seaborne raids and a
warrior elite—have their roots in the earlier Iron Age.
Scandinavia was first settled by bands of hunter-gatherers moving north in
the wake of retreating ice sheets about 8000 years ago. Farming was prac-
tised in southern Scandinavia by 4000 Be, bronze-working by 2000 nc and
iron-working by 500 ac. Little is known about Scandinavia in the Early Iron
Age (« 500 Be-ap 1): discov
important finds are the s
tims which are sometimes found in Danish peat bogs. During the Roman
Iron Age (« ap 1-400) chicfly dwellings, cult centres, richly furnished war-
tier burials and votive hoards of weapons appear in southern Scandinavia.
These point to the emergence of a warrior aristocracy and the beginnings
of political centralization. The impetus for this was probably competition to
control the wealth generated by contacts with the Roman Empire.
and the most
The votive offerings of a ship and weapons from Hjortspring (¢ 350 Bc) sug-
gests that sea-raiding was already common in Scandinavia during the Early
Iron Age. The Heruls (from Jutland) raided Frisia in Ab 287 and Spain in
e 455 and « 460, while the Danes are known to have raided Frisia in « 528
and ¢ 570, The migrations of the Jutes and Angles from Jutland to Britain
in the 5th century are also unlikely to have been entirely peaceful.
Scandinavia largely escaped the dislocation suffered in the rest of Europe
during the Migration Period (« 400-600), Fortified local
power centres, such as Eketorp on Oland, and the impres-
sive burial mounds at Gamla Uppsala
point to the emergence of well-orga-
nized chiefdoms. The final period
of the Scandinavian Iron Age
before the Viking Age was the
Vendel period or Late
Germanic Iron Age (¢ 600-
800), A rampart—the Dane-
virke—was built to protect
Denmark from the south,
and lavish ship burials were
made—evidence that Scan-
dinavia's first regional
kingdoms had
developed.Uiron-Age Scandinavia
Early Iron Age, ¢, 500 BC-AD |;
6 body in bog
@ = votive ship
Roman Iron Age. c. AD 1-400:
® warrior grave
= votive ship
4 other votive offering
Migration period, «. 400-600
ww" = migration out of setthed area
—_ burial mounds
Svear main Scandinavian peoples, c, 500
Late Germanic, c. 600-800;
unsettled area c. 700
« chief's residence and religious centre
++ seasonal trading place
sex royal defence work
pre-Viking ship burials:
. royal or aristocratic
= other
votive ship
Norwegian
Ae a
of wKvalsund
-» Raumi
Dankirke a *
Jutlane
les
oo eee einen oa
the Danevirke,
a buile eros the
jutiond peninsula
in 737
This helmet comes from one of the Sth-
century ship burials at Vendel in
Sweden, The size and
ificence of such burials
ce that states
now existed, ruled by
powerful kings who
could command
people and
resources over
awide area.
ALY ¥Pagan Religion and Burial Customs
Above: Thor goes fishing for
the world serpent. In his right
hand be wields bis hammer
Mijallnir, ready to stun the
beast, This scene appears on a
runestone from the church at
Altura in Sweden, testimony
to the lang coexistence of
Christianity and paganism in
much of Scandinavia,
Above right: « warrior rides
into Valhalla on Odin's eight-
legged horse Sleipnir and is
welcomed by a Valkyrie. The
scene appears on an Sth-
century stone carving from the
island of Gotland.
Most Vikings were pagans, and the old gods Thor, Odin and Freyr
lived on in Scandinavia long after much of Europe was Christian.
Unlike Christianity, Scandinavian pagan-
ism did not have a systematic theology
and lacked absolute concepts of good
and evil or of the afterlife, Religion was a
matter of the correct performance and
observance of sacrifices, rituals and festi-
vals, rather than of personal spirituality.
There was no fulltime priesthood; it was
Su cal chiefiains who
that festivals were obs d. A cycle of cosmological myths told of the cre-
ation of the world and of its ultimate destruction, Vikings believed that all
things were subject to fate, including the gods who would perish at
Ragnardk, the final cataclysm that would destroy the world,
As in other polytheistic igions, the Viking gods ruled over different
aspects of human life. The most important were Odin, Thor and Freyr.
Odin was a rather sinister deity who, with his brothers, had created the
human race and gave man the knowledge of poetry and of writing in runes.
Odin was the god of wisdom, power, war and poetry: he was a sorcerer and
could deprive men of their wits and exercise his power of life and death in
wildly unpredictable ways. Odin's attributes made him the god of kings,
chieftains, warriors and poets: both the Danish royal far ily
Hladir claimed descent from him. The most popular god among the peas-
antry was Thor, the god of phys strength, thunder and lightning, wind,
rain, good weather and crops. ng his mighty hammer Mjollnir, Thor
defended the world against the destructive power of the giants. Unlike
Odin, Thor was a straightforward, reliable god, but he was none too bright
and the myths concerning his deeds often highlight in a humorous way the
limitations of brute strength, Pendants fashioned in the sign of the hammer
were often worn by Thor's devotees,
and the Earls of
dynasty traced its ance
giant woman. Freyr had a
luck in love and represented sensuality, Fr was the leader of the disir, a
race of female demigods who presided over fertility in nature and in
humans. The god Loki was a cunning, witty mischief-maker, whose schemes
were always getting the gods and himself into trouble. Though he was not
an unambiguously evil figure like Satan, Loki was capable of great wicked-
ness and treachery, and the Vikings believed that his scheming would lead
in the end to Ragnarok.
The Vikings had rather vague ideas about the afterlife. The souls of heroic
warriors who had died in battle were taken by the Valkyries—fe
tand fight in Odin's home, Valhalla, the hall of the slain,
until the time ca for them to march out to fight side by side with the
gods against the giants at Ragnardk. Freyja too might c
warriors’ souls, as well as at least some women's. Others went to the dismal
twilight world of Hel. It was also believed that the dead could live on in the
ile
demigods—to f
m a share of thegrave. The common practice of placing everyday objects, weapons, tools and
even horses, wagons
i ships in graves is probably a sign that people
believed that the afterlife would resemble this life, and that somehow these
ds. Here, at the
Viking cemete
Hoje fn Denmar
objects would be useful to the dead. However, in some cases, such as the
yt Line
. Stones were nich ship burials at Oseberg and Gokstad, the grave goods may have been
f
form: the ontline of a
pronnerned 1
ace
intended more to impress the living with the wealth and status of the
ceased’s family than to help the dead. Whatever the beliefs that lay
has provided archae-
i ae } behind it, the practice of furnishing graves in this 4
Paganism in
Scandinavia,
c.800-1000
> vi
ologists with a major source of information about Scandinavian society in
the Viking
Before the Viking age, cremation was the normal method of disposal of the
i Scandinavia. The dead were cremated in everyday clothes
d throug
together with any goods that were to accompany them. The remains were
afterwards gathered together and placed in an pottery urn and buried or
a scattered on the ground. The grave could be
x * a. “=| marked by a mound or pile of stones or, as at
Lindholm Hoje, by ship-shaped settings of
stones. Early in the Viking age inhumation
began to be practiced in Denmark, Gotland and
re of the
Sirka. The richer inhumations w
“chamber grave” type, where the body was laid
fully clothed in a timber-lined pit surrounded by
grave goods and sometimes horses or human
sacrifices. The common people would be more
likely to be buried in a simple wooden coffin o1
birch-bark shroud. With the spread of
Christianity, inhumation, without grave goods,
became the normal burial practice across
Scandinavia by around 1000.II: Scandinavia in the Viking Age
The Viking age was a period of prosperity in Scandinavia. The
influx of wealth from trading and raiding boosted the economy.
The population was rising; new villages were founded and the area
under cultivation increased. Scandinavia’s first towns developed and
the medieval kingdoms of Denmark, Norway and Sweden emerged.
With the start of Viking raids in the last decade of the 8th century, western
Europeans, not surprisingly, began to take a greater interest in Scandinavia
than they had before, and contemporary literary evidence becomes more
plentiful. Western European writers understandably tended to concentrate
on what the Vikings were getting up to abroad, however, and though there
are numerous scattered references to events in Scandinavia, there are long
periods for which they give no evidence at all. These accounts can be sup-
plemented by the works of later Scandinavian historians such as the 12th-
century Dane Saxo Grammaticus and the 13th-century authors of the Ice-
landic sagas. Though vivid and realistic in style, these later works are based
largely on orally transmitted historical traditions and contain unreliable and
even fictionalized material, so they have to be used with some caution. The
Scandinavians themselves were not fully literate in the Viking age, but runes
(which had come into use in the Roman Iron Age) were used for charms
and for memorial inscriptions, some of which include valuable historical
information. Despite the limitations of the sources, it is fair to say that the
Viking age marks the end of Scandinavian prehistory.
The Free and the Unfree
Scandinavian society in the Viking age was divided into the free and the
unfree. Of the unfree—the slaves—we know very litle, but their weatment
probably varied greatly according to their skill and abilities, and many were
freed as a reward for good service. The free shared the right to bear arms,
to speak at the local assembly (the allthing) and to the protection of the law.
Though most freemen were tenant or frechold farmers, Scandinavian soci-
ety was not egalitarian, and the free class included a great range of wealth
and status, from the landless labourer to the aristocracy. This inequality was
reflected in the scale of fines laid down by law to compound a homicide:
the more wealthy and influential the victim, the higher the fine that had to
be paid to his family by the guilty party. As legal judgements had to be
enforced by the individuals concerned, this also put poorer freemen at a
disadvantage unless they had a powerful lord to force the guilty party to
comply. Though hierarchical, society was not static, and the Viking age
offered the ambitious and the able many opportunities to increase their
wealth and raise their status by joining pirate or trading expeditions over-
seas or by entering royal service.
The aristocracy exercised considerable power locally, even down to resiting
and replanning whole villages. The aristocracy played a leading role at the
local assembly, where they would arbitrate in legal disputes, and also at the
more important regional assemblies (¢hings) where major issues were dis-
cussed, The aristocracy's power and influence was based on landownership,
and by offering protection to less powerful men in return for their political
support, The highest of the aristocracy bore the tide jeri (English “earl”),Below: Reconstructions of
Viking-age trading ships
under sail in Roskilde Fjord,
Denmark. The growth of trade
in Viking-age Scandinavia led
to the development of a
variety of specialist merchant
ships: right, a small coaster
and left, a deep-sea trader or
knarr, Unlike warships,
merchants relied on their sails
for propulsion,
which probably origit
ful jarls, such as those of Hladéir in Trondelag or of Orkney, were consider-
lly meant simply “prom
“nt man”. The most power-
able rulers in their own right, exercising virtually royal powers over wide ter-
ritories. The aristocracy played an important role as war leaders, organizing
local defences and raising contingents of troops for the royal army. Some
chiefts
the Tall at the end of the LOth century, built up such large
that they be
ns led Viking raids and the most successful, like the Dane Thorkell
armed followings
ame potential rivals to the king. The independence of the aris
tocracy was challenged in the Viking age by the growth of royal power which
sought to exercise direct authority at a local level, rather than having to
work through the intermediary of the local chieftains
Struggles for Power
By the beginning of the Viking age, monarchy was already the dominant
force in society, Though the power of the monarchy was lix 1 to some
extent by the need for the king to consult the assemblies before taking
jor decisions, the king ust
asked King Olaf of the ), the
king told him that he would have to seek the approval of the assembly. The
lly got his own way. For example, when St
nska
vear for permission to preach in
proposal initially aroused opposition but Olaf, who favoured Christianity,
was able to manipulate proceedings to persuade the assembly to agree.
Another theoretical limitation on the power of the monarchy was that the
had to be
was usually a formality and, if necessary, the assemblies could be overawed
by an impressive show of force, as Olaf Tryggvason did with the Norwegian
accepted by the more impor
t assemblies. In practice this
assemblies in 995,The king’s income came from landownership, tolls on trade, tribute and
plunder from war. Royal administration was rudimentary and was per-
formed by members of the king's retinue, the hind, probably appointed on
an ad hoc basis for a specific task. Kings moved constantly from estate to
estate: they had favoured residences but the Viking kingdoms did not have
permanent administrative capitals. Viking kings were primarily rulers of
men rather than rulers of territory. Though usually the two went together, it
was not always necessary to have a kingdom to be recognized as a king:
many of the 9th-century Viking leaders were kings who, apparently, pos
sessed no lands,
Right: This silver ring from
Homelund in Denmark was
made in the 10th century, a
fine example of Viking
craftmanship in precious
metals,
The rules governing royal succession were that a king had to be descended
from a king on either his father’s or his mother’s side. A king might usually
be succeeded by one of his sons, but any male member of the royal dynasty
was eligible. This meant that there could be many potential claimants for
the throne, and succession disputes were common. Joint kings were a com-
mon expedient when rival claimants who had equal support were prepared
to compromise, but disputed successions often led to civil wars. The losers
in these civil wars, if they survived, went into exile to lick their wounds. All
was not lost for exiles of royal blood: they might persuade the ruler of a
neighbouring kingdom to provide them with military support to renew the
struggle or they might use the prestige that came from possessing royal
blood to raise a warrior band and go plundering. With luck, an exile might
acquire wealth, fame and a mighty following of warriors with which to try
once again to win power at home or a kingdom overseas. Returning exiles
were a major destabilizing influence in the Viking kingdoms and a constant
headache for established kings.
Denmark
The Viking kingdom we know most about in this period is Denmark. By
around 800 the Danes had already created a kingdom which included all of
modern Denmark, part of Germany and the provinces of Skane and
Halland which are now in Sweden. The Danish kings also seem to have
exercised some form of dominion over the Vestfold region of Norway. Inthe early Middle Ages Skane and Halland formed the Danes’ “mark”, or
border, which gave its name to the whole country.
The main preoccupation of the Danish kings at the beginning of the Viking
period was the threat (real or imagined) of Frankish expansionism.
Godfred, the first Danish king about whom we know much more than his
name, pursued an aggressive policy towards the Franks, attacking their Slav
allies in 808 and leading a large fleet to ravage Frisia in 810, Godfred also
rebuilt and extended the Danevirke rampart in 808, to protect Jutland from
Frankish invasion. After Godfred was murdered in 810, his nephew
Hemming became king and Godfred’s sons fled into exile. Two years later
Hemming died, and the crown was fought over by Sigfred, another nephew
of Godfred, and Anulo, a nephew of an earlier king. Sigfred and Anulo were
both killed in the battle which followed, but Anulo's party was victorious
and chose his brothers Harald Klak and Reginfred as joint kings. In 813 the
sons of Godfred returned and drove Harald and Reginfred into exile where
they recruited an army and tried, but failed, to win their throne back the
following year. Reginfred was killed and Harald went into exile in Francia.
When Godfred’s sons fell out among themselves in 819, Harald returned
and became joint king with one faction of the Godfred sons but was driven
out again in 827. By the 830s only one of Godfred’s sons, Horik, survived.
He was to hold onto his power until 853 when he was overthrown by a rebel-
lion within his own family.
Little is known about Denmark for the next century. The kingdom was fre-
quently divided and for some time around 900 at least part of it was ruled by
a Swedish dynasty. Around the mid 10th century, Gorm the Old (d. 958)
founded a new, and soon to be illustrious, dynasty. Gorm’s son, Harald
Bluetooth united Denmark and built a series of fortresses across the king-
dom to secure his direct authority in all parts of the country. Denmark was
under pressure from the Germans in the 10th century; in 974 they occupied
Hedeby, but were driven out seven years later by Harald. In 987 Harald was
deposed by his son Svein Forkbeard.
Viking raiding had begun to revive in the late 10th century, and successful
Viking leaders like Olaf Tryggvason and Thorkell the Tall rivalled Svein in
prestige and wealth. Svein bolstered his own position by leading his own
highly successful raids against England. At first Svein was content to milk
England for Danegeld, but as English resistance crumbled he conquered
the country in 1013, only to die a few months later.
Norway
At the beginning of the Viking period Norway was divided up into some-
thing like a dozen chiefdoms and petty kingdoms, and local identities were
still very strong. The Vestfold was probably the most politically advanced
area of the country in the 8th century, but by around 800 this region was
under Danish control. Danish influence declined as a result of the damag-
ing succession disputes of the 9th century, and shortly before 900 the king
of Vestfold, Harald Finehair, succeeded in winning control of much of
Norway at the battle of Hafrsfjord. For this achievement Harald is tradition-
ally credited with being the founder of the Norwegian kingdom. He and his
successors, however, faced the continuing opposition of the powerful jarls
of Hladir, Harald reigned for some 50 years, and was succeeded around 930
by his son Erik Bloodaxe. Erik was soon driven off the throne by his younger
brother Hakon the Good, and went into exile to earn a fearsome reputationas a Viking leader and to become, for two short periods between 948 and
954, King of York. Hakon was killed some time around 960 by Erik
Bloodaxe’s son Harald Greycloak, who then became king. Harald spent
much of his reign trying unsuccessfully to gain control of the Trondelag,
and was eventually killed around 970 fighting against an alliance of Jarl
Hakon of Hladéir and Svein Forkbeard. The allies restored Norway to Danish
control—if the jarls of Hladir had to submit to a king, they preferred to do so
to a distant rather than a near one.
Hakon remained the most powerful man in Norway until 995, when Olaf
Tryggvason, a grandson of Harald Finehair who had won much fame and
wealth as a Viking leader, invaded, put Hakon to flight and established him-
self as king over the whole country. Olaf ruled only five years before being
killed at SvGld (location unknown) in battle against an alliance between
Svein Forkbeard and Jarl Erik of Hladir. Svein and Erik divided control of
the country between them, but Norway had been united and it would be
again before long.
Sweden
Sweden is the Scandinavian country we know least about in this period.
There were two main peoples, the Svear, from whom Sweden takes its
name, in the region around Lake Malaren, and the Gotar around Lakes
Vanern and Vattern. Very litde is known about the Gotar, and they are not
mentioned in primary sources as being involved in Viking raiding (though
that might only be the result of confusion over identities). The names of a
few Svear kings are known from the 9th century, but the extent of their
authority is not known with any precision. However, by around 890 the
Svear kingdom probably included most of central Sweden and the islands of
Gotland and Oland. The relationship between the Svear and Gétar appears
to have been close, and some Svear kings were actually of Gotar origin. The
first king known for certain to have ruled both the Svear and the Gotar was
Olof Skétkonung (ruled ¢« 995-1020), but the unification of the two peo-
ples in a single kingdom was not complete until the 12th century.
From Pagan to Christian
The period between 800 and1000 saw the beginning of the Christianization
of Scandinavia. The Vikings came into contact with Christianity through
preaching missions like St Anskar's, which began in the 820s, and also
through their activities in the Christian lands. Many early conversions may
have been motived by practical rather than spiritual concerns. The first
Viking king to be baptized, Harald Klak in 826, probably did so to win the
support of Emperor Louis the Pious against his rivals at home. Christian
rulers such as Alfred the Great often made baptism a condition of peace
treaties. Some Vikings were baptized several times in this way without ever
truly accepting Christianity. The Annals of St Bertin record that after a
Frankish abbot had baptized a group of Vikings in 876 “he bestowed gifts
on them and sent them back to their own people, but afterwards, like typi-
cal Northmen, they lived according to the pagan custom just as before.”
Despite such setbacks, Christianity was well established among the Viking
settlers overseas by 900. Christianity was tolerated in Scandinavia from the
early 9th century, and there were churches in Hedeby, Ribe and Birka by
the 850s. The Vikings seem to have readily accepted Christ as a god to be
invoked along with the traditional Norse gods, but it took far longer for theChristian god to be accepted as the sole god. An Icelander, Helgi the Lean,
said that he was a Christian “but invoked Thor in matters of seafaring and
dire necessity.” The real breakthrough for Christianity came only in the
later 10th century, when kings like Harald Bluetooth and Olaf Tryggvason
converted, While no doubt sincere enough converts, these kings recognized
the potential of Christian doctrines and church organization as a means of
strengthening the monarchy and promoting the unity of their kingdoms.
Right: Thor was the most
popular of the Norse gods,
and his hammer symbol was
often worn to invoke his
protection. This 10th-century
amulet was found in Iceland;
its design has been strongly
influenced by the Christian
crucifix,From Chiefdoms to Kingdoms
Above: Harald Bluetoath's
rune stone in the Danish royal
cemetery at Jelling would
originally have been brightly
painted, It is inscribed: “King
Harald commanded these
memorials made to Gorm his
father and Thyre bis mother,
that Harald who won for
himself all Denmark and
Nonway and made the Danes
Christian.” The newly
baptized king bad the pagant
great beast and serpent
engraved on this side of the
stone, and the figure of Christ
ort the other.
directly.
2/The round fort at Fyrkat
This is one of four rownd forts in
Denmark which were probably built
around 980 ly Harald Bluetooth,
They all follow a standard design,
suguesting that they were planned
by a central authority with power
over considerable amounts of labour
and resources. Earlier Danish kings
had exercised poser indirectly
through the chieftains; by building
and garrisoning these forts (known
as Trelleborg-type round forts),
Harald could control bis kingdom
The kings of Denmark emerged as the most powerful force in
Scandinavia as chiefdoms gave way to organized states.
When Scandinavia emerged from its prehistoric period at the end of the
8th century, the Danes were politically the most adva
Scandinavian peoples. The kings of Denmark dominated an area far larger
than modern Denmark; their overlordship was recognized over much of
what is now southern Sweden and as far north as Vestfold in Norway. Kings
were chosen from a single royal family, but any member of that family could
aspire Lo the kingship. As a result, succession disputes were common
Unsuccessful claimants often went into exile rareer as Viking
leaders in order to win wealth ake a fresh bid for the
, and its authority collapsed
ed of the
bo pursue
1 te
d reputatic
nish monare
fof the 9th century.
throne. This destabilized the |
the second hz
Shortly before 900 Harald Finehair (d. 930), a king or chieftain in Vest-
-fold, exploited the collapse of Danish power to F
most of southern Norway. Harald is traditic
Norweg
ke himself master «
ally seen as the founder of the
n kingdom, though his control over the powerful Jarls of Hladir in
the Trondelag remained weak. By the mid-LOth century Danish power was
reviving under King Gorm (d. 958) and his son I dl Bluetooth (958-87)
re-established Danish control over N d was baptized in 965
and became the first Scandinavian king actively to promote Christianity,
Harald’s successor Svein Forkbeard increased the wealth and authority of
the monarchy by leading « series of well organized and successful 1
England, culminating in his conquest of the country in LOLS. By leading the
raids himself, Svein largely prevented any other Viking getting enough
wealth and prestige to challenge his throne, though in ¢ Norwegian
Viking, Olaf Tryggvason, did temporarily establish | mself as king of
Norway. He lost his kingdom and his life at the Battle of Sv6ld in 1000,
way. F
The history of Sweden
ghbouri
in this period is less well known, The Svear
people appear to have had a
5 Olof Skotkonung was described as king of the
« relations ad by
4 Gor
ar and Ge
. ar, ic two
peoples were not securely united until the 12th century, however. The Svear
kings ibute from Finnish areas east of the Baltic. Danish
influence was not as strong as in Norway, but Olof, whose nickname
“Skotkonung” means tribut:
o collec
ing, acknowledged Svein as overlord.pin we
Jors of Hla rl Trondelag . _ Ant eRe i ae
: ee ae : Vee Ie. gqare™ >
Vane 9
a | af we ae .
nan orsburgenG>
Vastergarn
ALS
KS vik
pingsv ©
ee
Lies | { Gotland
: o smantorp 5
| 1 Oland ie
|/State power in Scandinavia,
c. 800-1000
area under Danish control:
| ¢. 800
ff
c. 995
no permanent settlement
the “Army Re ayes , ed royal or aristocratic centre
f # ag site of regional assembly
defended settlement
OSS M ‘Wllin _base of independent round fort
A M y mercenary Jomsvikings other fort
ie 968-81 Seen royal defence work
Fe ee _ Germans invade Denmark trading place
Danish King Godfred “and occupy Hedeby ] a &P cl
repairs and extends . ishopric with date
Danevirke, fearing “€ » of foundation
a Frankish invasion 22 ee : . . Abodrites . other church
7 eae battleRural Settlement
“Ohthere was
among the foremost
men of
[Halogaland}; yet
he did not haze
more than 20 head
of catlle, and 20
sheep, and 20 pigs;
and the Little that
he ploughed, he
ploughed by
horses.”
Ohthere’s voyage
to the White Sea,
c. 890
Above: the wooden spade nas
one of the standard agricul-
tural implements of the Viking
world, This Sth-cemtury
example is made of oak, and
hus seen considerable wear, It
was found in one of the wells
at Vorbasse.
Most Scandinavians of the Viking age lived peacefully by
agriculture, rearing animals and growing crops in small villages.
The main farming activity in all the settled parts of Scandinavia—including
Halogaland, well beyond the Arctic Circle—was animal husbandry; cattle,
pigs, sheep and goats were all reared by the Vikings. In Denmark and south-
eden, arable farming was also important; the main crops were barley,
peas, beans and cabbage, Denmark may even have produced sur-
plus grain. In Arctic Norway and the marginal upland areas of Norway and
Sweden, hunting and fishing made a significant contribution to the diet as
well as providing valuable trade goods,
small villages were the normal form of settlement. These vil-
lages seem to have shifted their sites slightly every hundred years or so, and
only settled down onto permananent sites after the end of
the Viking age. There are few large areas of fertile land
in Norway, and the broken nature of the terrain led to
a dispersed settlement pattern with isolated farms on
small pockets of cultivable land. In Sweden too, set-
Hement was dispersed, but in the fe
stergotand and Uppland, villages were begin-
to appear by the end of the Viking age as
subdivision of existing farms,
The population of Scandinavia was rising
during the Viking age,
the period saw an expan
of the area under cultiva
and the creation of new :
ements where enough si
able land could be claim-
ed in between established
settlements,
e areas of
The most typical Viking-age
farm building was the long
house, which accommodat-
ed both people and animals
ms had
many outbuildings for use as
workshops or storage, A com-
mon type of smaller building
was the sunken-floored hut,
which was half buried in the
ground. These buildings were
well insulated and may have
been used for storing products
which needed to be kept cool, Building
techniques reflected the local environment, In much of Norway and
Sweden, where timber was plentiful, buildings had solid wooden walls and
roofs made of a layer of waterproof birch bark covered with insulating turf.
1 less forested a such as Jutland, timber-framed buildings were walled
1 clay-plastered wattle and roofed with thatch. In treeless areas such as
land, turf and stone were used as much as possible,
under one roof,
leVorbasse: a Viking farming
village
Vorhasse in Jutland is the only complete
Viking farming village to have been
excavated, The site has a complex history
of oceupation lasting from around 100 0
to Ab 1100, when the village mowed to its
present location about 750m to the south,
In the period from 700-1000 there were
six farms int the village, all of roughly the
same size. The main occupation was stock
rearing —the farms bad about 20 cows
each—but grain was also grown. The
village must have produced a surplus of
food wwilic
necessities it could not prowide for itself:
good building timber, iron, whetstones
and soapstone pots from Norway, and
goad quality y and lave quernstones
from the Rhineland,Trade and Trade Routes
Above: in Viking transactions,
silver was valved by weight.
This pair of balance scales
from Viking Dublin dates
from the 9th century and
soonclel Inave bean scsed few
weighing cobes or hacksilver.
I/Viking trade routes,
c. 925
Scandinavian state
—! or settlement
Viking-controlled
international
i
trading place
Viking trade route
other major
trade route
Alongside raiding and settlement, Vikings operated a far-flung
trade network from Greenland to Central Asia.
Scandinavian trade with the rest of Europe increased in the 8th century,
and probably encouraged the Viking expansion. Scandinavians on trading
vovages would have become aware of the unguarded riches of western
Europe, while the growing fur trade provided the incentive for the Swedes
to establish themselves in northern Russia. Some Scandinavians made a liv
ing exclusively as merchants, but most were part-timers who also engaged in
farmi
ig, crafts or even piracy. The most valuable goods were initially
acquired as plunder or tribute. Huge amounts of silver, paid as Danegeld,
came from England and Francia; furs and slaves were extorted as tribute
from the Finns, Lapps and Slavs and then traded for silver with the Arabs,
Wealth flooded into Scandinavia during the 9th and 10th centuries; on the
Baltic island of Gotland alone, 40,000 Arabic, 38,000 Frankish and 21,000
Anglo-Saxon silver coins have been found in hoards from this period.
Most trade was short-distance, conducted by farmer-merchants to and from
dozens of small ports around the Scandinavian coasts. A smaller number of
international trading places attracted merchants from England, Frisia,
Germany and occasionally even as far afield as the Caliphate of Baghdad.
Most of these centres began as seasonal meeting places where craftsmen set
up temporary workshops and merchants could trade by barter or for silver.
Successful centres, like Hedeby and Ribe, developed into Scandinavia’s first
towns. Kings sought to encourage and control trade by protecting mer
from piracy in exchange for tolls and taxes. In
, wade aided the growth
of royal power i 4
ScandinavKaupang: a Viking-age trading place
Kaupang was sited on a sheltered bay close to the mouth of Oslo Fjord. Large
seasonal markets were held here (the name means “market place” from c. 730-900.
Trade was international; English, Frankish, Danish and Arabic coins have been
found, along with Rhenish, Frisian and Slavic potiery, Rhenish glass and English
. There was probably no permanent population; most of the buildings so far
excavated were crafismen's workshops. Industrial activities included ship repairs,
soapstone ing, metalworking and glass bead production. Graves in the nearby
cemeteries contained imported goods and agricultural tools, and were probably those
of local farmers who were also seasonal traders.
brortz
KHAZAR
KHANATE
teilShips and Seafaring
“The winier after
King Olaf came
from Halogaland,
he had a great
vessel buili at
Ladehaminer, which
was larger than any
ship in the
country... Thorberg
Shafhogg was... the
master builder af the
ship; but there were
many others
besides—some to fell
wood, some to shee
it, some to make
nails, some to carry
timber; and all that
was used was of the
best.”
King Olaf
Trygevason's Saga
Right: memorial slabs from
the Baltic island of Gotland
offer the earliest clear
evidence of the use of the sail
in Scandinavia. This &th-
century stone shows the
diagonal stitching in the sail,
and the rigging held by the
two crew members.
Without seaworthy sailing ships, the Viking expansion would
have been impossible. Their importance is demonstrated in art,
poetry, religion and burial practices.
Viking ships were built using the clinker or lapstrake technique in which
the lower edge of each hull plank overlaps the upper edge of the one below
it. This technique gave the Viking ships light, flexible hulls which “rode” the
waves and had excellent sea-keeping qualities. Viking ships were double-
ended, with the bow and the stern built in the same way, and were steered
by a side rudder (always on the right, hence starboard). There were many
different types of Viking ship, all built to suit a particular purpose or mari-
time environment.
Typical of a small Viking warship is the 11th-century longship known as
Skuldelev 5, found with four other wrecks at Skuldelev near Roskilde in
Denmark, The ship was 57 feet (17.5m) long by 8 feet (2.5m) wide, and had
a crew of 26 oarsmen. Tests with a replica of the ship have shown that it
could reach speeds of over 9 knots under sail and over 5 knots when rowed
by a full crew. Even fully loaded it drew only 18 inches (50 cm) of water; it
would have been ideally suited to raiding in the shallow waters of the
Baltic and the southern North Sea, and could have sailed far inland up
rivers. Norwegian longships, such as the Gokstad ship, sailed mostly in
deeper Atlantic waters and were broader and had deeper keels than Danish
longships. The royal fleets of the late Viking age also included much larger
“dragon” ships such as King Olaf Tryggvason’s “Long Serpent”. At 100 feet
(30m) long and needing a crew of over 50 oarsmen, Skuldelev 2 was
probably such a ship,
Trade ships, built with cargo carrying capacity in mind, were shorter than
longships and had wider, deeper and heavier hulls. Trade ships relied on
their sails for propulsion and could be worked by small crews of four to six
men: a few oars only were carried for manoeuvring in harbour. The most
important type of seagoing trade ship was the sturdy knars, represented by
wreck 1 from Skuldelev. This was 54 feet (16.5m) long and had a cargo
capacity of 24 tons, The knarr was undoubtedly the type of ship which was
used for to carry settlers across the North
Atlantic to Iceland, Greenland and
America (» pages 98-9). Local trade was
carried on in small ships such as
Skuldelev 3, which had a cargo capacity
of 4 tons,
It is not known exactly how the Vikings
navigated their ships. Where it was
convenient they hugged the coast,
navigating by prominent landmarks
ashore: certainly most of the Danish raids
on Francia and southern England could
have been carried out this way. However,
the Vikings, especially the Norwegians,
did make considerable open sea voyages
on which they could be out of sight of
land for several days or longer. Though
they lacked the magnetic compass, theVikings possessed a simple sun compass which
could locate north with tolerable accuracy in
clear weather, Viking navigators could also use
the stars to judge latitude, a great aid to
navigation if the latitude of the destination was |
known. Navigators would have been heirs to a
stock of orally transmitted practical knowledge of
sea and weather conditions. The presence of an
island over the horizon might be detected by
cloud formations or the direction of flight of
seabirds; a slackening of the sea in stormy
conditions could indicate that the ship had sailed
into the lee of an island made invisible by rain or
cloud. Despite tricks like these, the Viking
seafarer was desperately vulnerable to being
blown off course or shipwrecked in bad weather.
Sometimes a storm-driven mariner would find his
way home to tell of a sighting of a new land, but
many more must have been lost without trace.
Below: fine weather vanes
adored the masts of stems
of Viking ships. Originally
streamers were attached to
the holes in the edge to give
an indication of wi
and strength, The V:
bad few navigational aids
and relied on an expert
knowledge of landmarks,
sea conditions and the
positions of the sin and
stars to find their way.
Right: “Helge Ask”, a replica
of the Skuldelew 5 ship, a
small Danish warship of
c. 1000 foune in Roskilde
Fjord, Swift under sails or
oars, even fully laden it bas a
draught of only 18 inches
(50.cm) making it ideally
suited for raiding far inland
ont rivers like the Seine and
the Loire.Viking Towns
“[Healely] is a large
town at the other
end of the world
The town is
SU...
nol rich im goods...
The staple Jood Ay
fish, since it is so
plentiful. It often
happens that a
newhor " inja ree as
tossed into the sea
to save raising it
Also women
may divorce thei
husbands. .
Nothing can
compare with the
dreadful singing of
these people, worse
even thian the
barking of dogs.”
al-Tartushi, an
Arab merchant
from Spain, ¢. 950
Towns were slow to develop in Viking Age Scandinavia, but by
1000 there were several thriving urban centres.
Scandinavia had no true towns before the Viking age, though there were
several seasonal market centres. When towns did spring up, it did not hap-
pen spontancow Irban development went hand in hand with the growth
of royal power, and most towns appear to have been deliberately founded,
often on virgin sites, by rulers to encourage, control and profit from trade.
By the late 10th century towns were also being founded as adminis
and ecclesiastical centres,
The earliest towns in Scandinavia, Ribe, Birka and Hedeby, all date from
the late 8th century, The Danish monarchy played an important role in the
foundation of Hedeby, and both Ribe and Birka were under close royal con-
trol in the early 9th century, suggesting that they too were deliberate royal
foundations. Hedeby, the largest of the three towns, had a population of
1000-1500: Ribe and Birka were somewhat smaller. Ribe has sur-
vived as a trade, ceclesiastical and administrative centre to the
present day, making it idinavia’s oldest town, but Birka
and Hedeby both fell victim to falling sea levels, which
made it increasingly difficult for the deeper draught-
ed merchant ships of the 10th century to use
them. Birka was abandoned around 70,
Hedeby by 1100.
Hedeby, Ribe and Birka remained the
only towns in Scandinavia until the
10th century, when Arhus was
founded, apparently as a craft
and manufacturing centre. The
pace of urban development
increased around
1000: Sigtuna,
Trondheim,
Oslo, Viborg,
Odense, Ros-
kilde and Lund
were all founded
as administrative or
Hedeby
For most of the Viking age Hedebry was
Scandinavia’s largest town. Thowgh some
sort of settlement existed at Hedetry before King
Godfred settled a colowy of merchants there in B08,
it was probably this act that led to Hedely developing
into an international market centre. There was a nrint, and
the remains of what teas probably a toll station have been exca-
vated, but little else is krown about the admsnistration of the town. A
wide range of manufacturing activities were carried out, including metal,
bone, amber and glassworking, pottery and ship repair. In the 10th century
Hedeby was provided with substantial defences linking it with the Danevirke rampart
bur it was sacked by Harald Hardrada in 1050 and bry the Wends in 1066. By 1100 Hedetry
bad been abandoned in favour of nearty Schleswig, probably because Schleswig was easier of
access to the deeper draughted merchant ships which were then coming into use.ecclesiastical centres shortly before or after this date,
Urban development was slowest in Sweden, where royal
authority developed more slowly than in Denmark and
Norway. By 1100 there were still only four towns in
Sweden, while 1
there were e!
n Denmark there were 15 and in Norway
ht
Right: Hedeby was the first
town it Scandinavia to have a
regular sist, The ship design
ow this early Stb-century coin
minted at Hedeby shows the
importance of seafaring in the
life of the torn.Women in the Viking Age
Scandinavian society was male dominated, but women were far
from being chattels: many were strong-minded and had a high
status in the community.
Men and women had clearly defined and separate social roles in Viking-age
Scandinavia, Men ploughed, fished, hunted, traded and fought. Most
women's lives were more rowly confined to the home: they milked the
cows and churned butter, ground grain and baked bread, spun wool, wove
cloth and looked after the children. The grave goods in pagan burials mir-
ror these roles exactly: men were buried with weapons and tools, women
with jewellery, needlework and weaving equipment, and other household
utensils that would be useful in the afterlife.
Though marriages were usually arranged by negotiations between the
prospective husband and the bride’s father, the woman's wishes would usu-
ally be taken inte account. At
wT
ge was regarded as an alliance between
juals. The bricle
mally brought a dowry to the part
rship, and the
ained her property after 1
riage. Women had the right to a divorce if a marria
husband paid her a “bride-price”; both re
ge proved unworkable,
c , and the marriage contract could stipulate how th
divided in such an eventuality. Though they had no role in public life, with-
in the home women exercised
joint estate should be
thority over slaves and dependents,
and would always be closely involved i
ajor decisions affecting the family.
If her husband was away, at war or on business, a wife would have full
responsibility for the running of the house and farm in his absence; and if
she were widowed she would have to take her husband's place full time.
Family honour was of as much concern to women as it was to men, In
Above Right: these bone pins leelandic literature au le ist, they were me ver slow to urge their me nfolk to
are typical of the cloak — take revenge for any injury, and it is likely that they took the lead in com
fastenings
by Viking-age =memorating the dead. P:
k suggest that women's sta-
women for everyday wear.
wan graves in Dero
tus increased with a
fe: some of the most richly furnished burials are of
They come frowt a settlement
at the Udall in North Uist in = Women aged 50 or over, while the quality of grave goods in male burials
the Ourer Hebrides decreased with the age of the dead manRight: few large, trtricately- There is no reliable evidence to
decorated gold disc brooches suggest that women ev
of the type nsed bry both ‘i re ‘
: fought as warriors alongside
women and men for fastening
cloaks or sleeved couts—a their menfolk, but it is
very expensive alternative to known that at least some of
the bone pins illustrated on
the left
r
the warriors of the great
Viking armies that were active
in weste
»pe in the sec-
ond half of the Oth century were
accompanied by their wi
t
ilies. These women would have given
ag and caring for the wounded. Wome
rent participants in the Viking settle-
id, where their presence was essential from
Iceland d
scful support to the ar
ally, were much more pro!
ments in Ice,
the start. Women ring the settlement period seem to have
enjoyed higher status than those ¢ here in Scandinay
minded independent women cc only appear in the
in the attempt to sete Vinland is also re
and by finds of spindle whorls at the short-lived Norse settleme;
aux-Meadows ( pages 98-9). There is very little evidence that Sc
women accompanied the Rus on their journeys in the ez
finds of typically Scandinavian female
ences show that thi
dand Green
and strong-
lion of wor
dinavian
i, though
and rare literary refer-
were at least some.
Arab sources suggest that
most of the Rus found local wor if this is true, it could explain
why the Rus were so rapidly assimilated into the native Slav popu-
lation.
Left: women's clothing of the Below: a group of everyday household
Viking age can be items, including spindle whorls and
reconstructed from rags whetstones from a Viking-age farm at
found at Hedeby and Birka. Bryants Gill, Kentmere. Place names
A good-quality ouifit would suggest that there were many farms in
have consisted of a pinafore Oris part of the Lake District during the
dress of fine woolen fabric Viking-age, but Bryants Gill is the only
over a long-sleeved, ankle- one to bave been excavated; the rest are
length linen tunic. A pair of buried under present-day farms.
gilt oval brooches would Women’s skill with the spindle whorls
have fastened the dress at the ensured that Viking-age farms were
shoulders; gold thread was virtually self-sufficient as far a3
used to decorate the hem. clothing was concerned.Ill: The Viking Raids
Below: Thongh the Vikings
can no longer be regarded
simply as the bloodthirsty
Plunderers shows in this 19th
century painting bry Lorenz
Frolich, there can be no doubt
that their raids caused great
destruction in westert Europe,
especially to momasteries.
The Vikings have become a byword for seaborne terror: violent
raiders descending in their longships to plunder monasteries and
butcher peaceful communities of men, women and children. But
were they really more violent than their Christian contemporaries?
The most hotly debated issues rega
number
re their
ind the destructiveness and violence of their raids. Traditionally,
the Vikings have been regarded by historians as wantonly cruel, violent and
destructive pirate hoards. However, in recent years a new view of the Vikings
has gained widespread acceptance. The Vikings, it is argued, were the vic-
tims of a bad press: their numbers, violence and destructiveness were preatly
exaggerated by monastic chroniclers who were prejudiced against them
because of their paganism and their habit of plundering monasteries.
Rather than destructive raiders, the Vikings should be regarded primarily as
ling the history of the Vikings
fismen. The level of Viking violence was only
that normally prevailing in early medieval Europe in so far as it
did not exempt the church.
worse tha
In facet, these two views of the Vikings are not irreconcilable, Most Viking-
age Scandinavians were indeed peaceful farmers, craftsment and traders
whose lives were probably rarely touched by violence. However, those
Seanclir 1s who chose warfare or pi
ors who went / viking and participated
so terrified the monks of Christi
extreme violence to achieve th
occupation
acy as a profession, that is the war-
the plundering expeditions that
ust have been prepared to use
ng was by definition a violent
Apo pe
ends: 1Feeding the Wolves
Were the Viking warriors actually any more violent than their Christian con-
temporaries? Charlemagne’s execution of 4500 Saxon rebels at Verden in
782 shows that the Christians were capable of waging war ruthlessly. As early
medieval armies had to live off the land, there can be litthe doubt either that
in wars between Christian states, the peasantry would have suffered greatly
from pillaging by enemy armies—and the foraging of “friendly” armies may
have been only slightly less destructive. While western Christendom was no
stranger to violence, at the time of the outbreak of Viking raiding it was nev-
ertheless more peaceful than it had been at any time since the fall of the
western Roman Empire, and, away from disputed borderlands, fortifications
of any sort were rare. From being exceptional, the Vikings made violence
into an everyday threat for the population of much of western Europe for
long periods of time, Even in Ireland, the most anarchic region of western
Christendom, the Vikings brought a great increase in the scale of violence.
In the period 831-919, Irish sources record only 16 instances of natives
plundering and burning, compared to 110 by the Vikings.
The group that arguably suffered the most from Viking raids, the church,
was relatively immune from warfare between Christians; even in Ireland,
where battles between the monks of rival monasteries were not unknown,
churches were rarely plundered. Monasteries were the main centres of liter-
acy in western Christendom, and most of our contemporary accounts of
Viking raids were written by monks. According to these sources, Viking raids
were often marked by wanton destruction and appalling savagery unparal-
leled in the knowledge of the writers. It is, of course, possible that some of
these accounts may have been exaggerated by the writers’ very personal fear
and horror of an enemy who made a point of attacking churches, but gener-
ally they agree very closely with accounts of Viking raids written in the very
different cultural atmospheres of Orthodox Constantinople and the Islamic
lands. They also agree very closely with what the Vikings said about them-
selves. Skaldic poetry of the Viking age glories in bloodshed:
“The destroyer of the Scots fed the wolves: he trod on the eagle’s evening
meal [of corpses]. The battle-cranes flew over the rows of the slain; the
beaks of the birds of prey were not free from blood; the wolf tore wounds
and waves of blood surged against the ravens’ beaks.” (trs. A P. Smyth,
Warlords and Holy Men London 1984).
Egil Skallagrimsson composed these words in praise of Erik Bloodaxe, but to
judge the values of the whole of Scandinavian society on the basis of skaldic
verse would be as unwise as it would be to judge late 20th-century western
society on the basis of violent movies. However, skaldic verse was composed
for an elite warrior audience, and everything else that we know about this
class suggests that it accurately reflects its values. It is also from Scandinavian
sources that we know of the “blood eagle”, the Viking practice of killing cap-
tives by hacking through the ribcage on either side of the spine and then
tearing the victim's lungs out. This horrific act, of which some historians are
oddly reluctant to believe the Vikings capable, may have been performed as
a sacrifice to the warriors’ god Odin. In fact, it is only common sense to
assume that Viking pirates went out of their way to create fear and terror, if
only to weaken their victims’ will to resist. The ruthless Viking image may
not be typical of Viking-age Scandinavian society taken as a whole, but it is
certainly representative of an important class within it. Having said this,
there is no reason to suppose that the Vikings were uniquely inhuman: they
were barbarian warriors, and their behaviour was probably neither betternor worse than that, for example, of the the pagan ancestors of the Franks
and Anglo-Saxons who invaded the Roman Empire in the 3rd to 5th
centuries.
Fleets and Armies
Western European sources tend to give the strength of the Viking invaders
in terms of numbers of ships in their fleets, rather than the number of men
in their armies, This raises some obvious problems when used as a basis for
calculating the size of the Viking armies. How many men can you get in a
ship? Were all Viking ships the same size? How accurately were they count-
ed? To deal with the last question first: when the numbers mentioned in the
sources are small, for example the account in the Frankish Royal Annals of
a raid by 13 Viking ships in 822, it is reasonable to assume that it is an exact
count. With larger fleets there is certainly a much greater likelihood that
the figures are an approximation. But at what point can we justifiably begin
to suspect exaggeration? There is in fact remarkable consistency between
sources from Ireland, Francia and Britain as to the size of Viking fleets.
Before 850 fleets of over 100 ships are rarely mentioned, the exceptions
being fleets under royal leadership such as Godfred’s attack on Frisia with
200 ships in 810, After 850, sources often mention Viking fleets that were
120, 150, 200 or 250 strong, as well as many smaller ones. The tendency has
been to accept the smaller figures as reliable and to reject the larger ones as
exaggerations, although in most cases the only “evidence” of exaggeration is
that the figures are large—a dangerously circular argument. The wide-
spread agreement between independent sources of the same period argues
strongly in favour assuming most of the figures, large and small, to be at
least approximately accurate. Only in exceptional circumstances can figures
from primary sources be rejected outright, For example, the assertion of
Abbo, the historian of the siege of Paris in 885-86, that the Viking force
numbered 700 ships and 40,000 men is almost certainly a gross exaggera-
tion, because it would have been impossible to keep such a huge army in
the field for so long under early medieval conditions.
We do not yet know enough about Viking ships to be able to say how many
men they held on average. The 9th-century Gokstad ship was built for a
crew of 32 oarsmen, but it was fitted with 52 shields on each side, suggesting
a total complement of up to 70 (a double crew would allow rowing in
shifts). The slightly later Ladby ship also had 32 oars, but was less broad
than the Gokstad ship, and so probably could not carry as many men, while
the smaller of the two longships of ¢, 1000 found at Skuldelev had only 24
oars, If ships were carrying horses, provisions, wives and children, plunder
or captives, they would also have carried fewer men than the theoretical
maximum. Even so, if we take the smallest of these three ships as being typi-
cal, and assume that it carried no supernumeraries, we would still have to
conclude that the larger Viking fleets of the later 9th century carried armies
of a few thousand warriors rather than the few hundred some historians
have argued for, An army of this size would be difficult to keep together for
a long time, and the evidence suggests that once a base was established the
Viking armies often split up into raiding bands of a few hundred men to
plunder the countryside.
Literary and archaeological evidence suggests that the royal fleets that
attacked England in the period leading up to the Danish conquest
(980-1016) included longships that were rather larger than those used in
the 9th century. The larger of the longships from Skuldelev was just such aship: it had 50 oars and could have carried a
complement of 80-100, Even if there were only
a few dozen of these “dragon ships” in the fleet
of 160 ships Cnut used to invade England in
1016, his army could very easily have numbered
6-7000. By way of comparison, it is estimated
that the Norman army at Hastings—which also
invaded in a fleet of longships—numbered
some 5-6000 men. There were even larger ships
available at this time; King Olaf Tryggvason's
ship the “Long Serpent” had 68 oars and was
capable of carring several hundred men. These
dragon ships were probably used mostly for
coastal defence, however.
Important further evidence that the Viking
armies were not small comes from a document
known as the Burghal Hidage, compiled in
Wessex around 900, This is a list of the burhs or
fortified towns in Wessex, and the number of
hides (a measure of land) which were assigned
to each for the purposes of garrisoning. The for-
mula used assumed that four men were needed
to defend one pole (5 '/2 yards) of wall and that
one man was to be supplied from each hide
assigned to the burh. Wareham, for example,
was assigned 1600 hides, meaning that its
eee defences were of such a length as to require 1600 men to man them, that is
during the reign of Alfred the 400 poles (2200 yards). This corresponds exactly with reality: Wareham’s
Great (871-901) to give defences still exist, and are 2180 yards in length. Defences would not have
Sacco been built unless the men were available to man them—walls that were too
baw of Wensex ta long to be manned properly would have been worse than useless, As the
combatting the Vikings. These total number of hides assigned to burhs in Wessex was 27,071, it must be a
pages cover the years 862-74, fair assumption that this number of armed men could be raised by the king-
Bcueean eae ee dom of Wessex for garrison duty alone. When it is also taken into account
overrun by the Danes, that Alfred the Great kept an army on standby and also had a fleet, the
armed strength of Wessex must have been somewhat over 30,000 men,
Admittedly they could not all be concentrated in one place at the same
time, but it is difficult to believe that a Viking army numbering in the hun-
dreds, rather than the thousands, could have brought Wessex to its knees,
let alone conquer all the ather Anglo-Saxon kingdoms as well.
On the other hand, the only excavated Viking fortification in Britain, a
camp built by the Danish Great Army at Repton in the winter of 873-4, had
defences of only 200 yards in length. The enclosed area is therefore small,
and could not have accommodated a large force, while the defences could
have been manned adequately with a garrison of no more than 150.
However, the fort lay on the banks of the River Trent and, as it had a slip-
way, it may have been built primarily as a protective enclosure for ships
rather than as accommodation for the whole army.
A mass burial discovered outside the fort at Repton contained the remains
of at least 249 individuals, 80 percent of them males aged 15 to 45. The
bones were arranged around a central burial of a high status male, presum-
ably one of the leaders of the Great Army surrounded by his followers. As
none had apparently died of injuries, the most likely explanation of the bur-ial is that these were the victims of an epidemic. Pre-modern armies could
expect to suffer heavy casualties from disease, and a death rate in winter
camp of less than 5 percent would be improbable even in good conditions,
and one of more than 35 percent unlikely even in a major epidemic, If the
mass burial contains the total Viking dead (the presence of other scattered
burials around the site shows that actually it does not), it would point to the
Great Army having a minimum strength of 600 and a maximum strength of
4000 men, plus camp followers.
Though a major Viking army of the 9th century may have numbered a few
thousand warriors, there certainly were not vast hordes of Vikings streaming
out of Seandinavia. Vikings tended to concentrate in particular areas at par-
ticular times. When Francia was intensively raided in 879-92, England and
Ireland saw little Viking activity, and when the Vikings moved to England in
892, Francia enjoyed a respite. There were rarely more than one or two
large Viking forces active at any one time, so total Viking numbers must
have been quite limited.
The First Raids
The earliest recorded Viking raids were on England: the first, according to
the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, around 789, was a raid by three ships from
Right: The martyrdom of St.
Edmund, from a tSth-century
wall painting in Pickering \™
church, North Yorkshire. The
Viking Great Army which
invaded England in 865 made
short work of the small (EO
kingdom of East Anglia, Its a ie
king, Edmund, was captured
in battle and put to a cruel |
death. The cult of St. Edmund |
became popular in the
Danelaw after the Viking |
settlers began to convert to |
Christianity. |
Norway on Portland in which the reeve Beaduheard and his men were
killed. In 792 the great Mercian King Offa arranged coastal defences, pre-
sumably against Viking pirates, and in 793 came the shocking raid on the
famous monastery founded by St Cuthbert on the Northumbrian island of
Lindisfarne, one of the holiest places in the British Isles, The Vikings ran-
sacked the church, killed some of the monks and carried off others into
captivity, However, the monastic buildings were not destroyed and many of
the monastery’s treasures, such as the splendid Lindisfarne Gospels, sur-
vived, Presumably the monks had at least a little warning of the attack and
were able to hide much of the monastery’s wealth before the Vikings struck,
It is difficult today to appreciate quite how appalling the attack must have
seemed to contemporary Christians. When Alcuin wrote of the attack, “it
was not believed that such a voyage was possible,” he was not expressing sur-prise at some hitherto unsuspected seafaring ability on the part of the
Vikings—he was well aware of contacts between Northumbria and
Scandinavia—but shocked that God and the saints had not intervened to
prevent it happening. If somewhere as holy as Lindisfarne was not safe,
nowhere was.
The raid on Lindisfarne was typical of the first phase of Viking activity which
lasted until around 834. Small fleets of up to about a dozen ships launched
uncoordinated raids on the coasts of Britain, Ireland, Frisia and Francia but
rarely penetrated more than a few miles inland. Though the speed and
mobility enjoyed by the Vikings made such hit-and-run raids hard to pre-
vent, Frankish and Anglo-Saxon resistance was often well organized and
effective. All too often, however, the Vikings would have struck and put to
sea again by the time a force had been gathered against them. The Irish,
who were in a permanent state of anarchic disunity, put up much less effec-
tive resistance and suffered severely from Viking raids in this period.
While disunity in western Europe did not cause of the Viking raids—Europe
has only rarely been more united—the Vikings were sensitive to political
problems and quick to take advantage of them, When civil war broke out in
the Frankish empire in 830, with serious consequences for the effectiveness
of the coastal defences, Viking raiding entered a new and more serious
phase which lasted until 865. Viking fleets became larger (30-35 ships at
first, rising to over 100 by the 850s) and bolder, sailing far inland along navi-
gable rivers like the Rhine, Seine, Loire and Shannon to sack major towns.
A few raids were also made on Spain and the Mediterranean, though these
were not great successes.
In the first phase of Viking activity, raiding had been a seasonal activity with
the fleets returning home for the winter. In this second phase the Vikings
built camps and began to overwinter in western Europe, allowing an earlier
start to raiding the next spring. Permanent settlements were also made in
Scotland and Ireland. The Carolingians’ dynastic disputes ensured that for
most of this period Francia was the focus of Viking activity. The granting of
Walcheren as a fief to a troublesome Viking leader in 841 began a period of
intermittent Viking rule in Frisia which lasted until the 880s.
Conquest and Settlement
A third phase of Viking activity, characterized by conquest and settlement,
began in 865 when a large Viking army invaded East Anglia, shifting the
focus of Viking activity to England. After conquering East Anglia,
Northumbria and Mercia, the Vikings made extensive settlements in eastern
England in the 870s, This period also saw the beginning of the settlement of
Iceland, though this was a peaceful affair. The successful resistance of
Wessex under Alfred the Great caused those Vikings who did not have the
means or the inclination to settle to move their activities back to Francia in
the period 879-92. After the Franks made things too hot for them there, the
Vikings tried their luck again in England. Alfred the Great had completely
reorganized the defences of his kingdom in the previous decade, and the
Vikings were harried constantly by the English until their army dispersed in
896, bringing this phase of Viking activity to a close. More effective Irish
resistance led to a virtual cessation of Viking activity in Ireland after 874.
The period from 896 to 954 saw a gradual decline in Viking activity. In
Francia Rollo and his Vikings were given lands to settle on the lower Seine
by Charles the Simple in return for undertaking to keep other Vikings out.Above: This wood carving
shows an impressive fleet of
late-Viking slips drawn mp on
the shore. Contemporary
accounts of Viking invasions
usually assess the strength of
their forces in terms of
numbers of ships, making it
difficult for modern historians
to be sure of the size of Viking
armies.
Though there were occasional border troubles, the settlement, which
became known as Normandy, effectively ended Viking incursions up the
Seine. In 914 the Vikings attempted to create another settlement in cont-
nental Europe by conquering Brittany, but in 936 the Bretons drove them
out, virtually ending Viking activity on the Continent. Only Frisia, on the
main Viking route from Denmark to southeast England, was still raided reg-
ularly, Northwest England was settled by Norwegians from around 900, but
after this the Vikings were thrown onto the defensive by the kings of
Wessex, who had conquered all of the Scandinavian settlements in England
by 954. This was not to be the end of Viking activity in England, however;
raids began again in the 980s on an increasingly devastating scale. In
Ireland, the long hiatus in Viking activity known as the “Forty Years Rest”
came to an end in 914. Raiding continued steadily from then on, but the
distinction between Viking attacks and internecine conflicts became
increasingly blurred as the Scandinavians became absorbed into the indige-
nous population of Ireland,
The Impact of the Vikings
The Viking raids had a great, sometimes decisive, impact on western
Europe. But although the Vikings have been blamed for the break-up of the
Carolingian empire, the driving force for this process was internal and
dynastic: the Vikings profited from the empire's internal problems but did
not cause them, The Vikings usually came a poor second to dynastic con-
cerns in the priorities of the Carolingian rulers, and they were sometimes
even welcomed as allies in internecine struggles. Royal measures against the
Vikings were often perceived by the Franks to be half-hearted, and by
demonstrating the ineffectiveness of royal power, the Vikings may have has-
tened its decline. The Vikings brought the Franks one certain benefit: their
occupation of Brittany in 914-36 broke the power of the native rulers and
paved the way for the region’s incorporation into Francia. The most impor-
tant long-term consequence of the Viking involvement in Francia was, how-
ever, the establishment of the Duchy of Normandy. Though the Norman
expansion of the Llth century cannot be considered an expression of inher-
ited Viking spirit—it was caused by internal political and social develop
ments—its importance to the history of England, France and Italy can hard-
ly be understated.
In England and Scotland, the Vikings broke up the existing power struc-
tures with far-reaching consequences for the history of both countries. In
Scotland the Viking attacks on the Picts, the Northumbrians and
Strathclyde Britons shifted the balance of power in favour of the Scots,
allowing them to unify the country. In England the Vikings eliminated the
kingdoms of East Anglia, Northumbria and Mercia, leaving Wessex as the
sole Anglo-Saxon kingdom, When the Danelaw was conquered by Wessex in
the 10th century, the English were, for the first time, united under onecrown. Thus both England and Scotland owe their existence as unified
states indirectly to the Vikings. The extensive Danish settlements in eastern
England have also had a major influence on the development of the English
language, which has acquired hundreds of loan words from Old Danish,
including ones as basic as sky, egg and sister. Despite this, the Scandinavian
settlers in England were absorbed into the native population within 150
years or so. In the Hebrides they preserved their identity a little longer and
in Orkney and Shetland, well beyond the end of the Viking age. Aside from
the cultural damage caused by attacks on monasteries, the Vikings had sur-
prisingly little effect on Ireland, but they did give the country its first towns
and drew it more closely into the European economy.
The effects of the Vikings on the European economy are harder to gauge.
Damage to the agricultural economy caused by raids and campaigns is likely
to have been short-lived. Towns were built mainly of wood, so although they
burned easily, they were also easy to rebuild. Repeated raiding would not be
good for their prosperity, but the two main towns which are known to have
gone out of existence altogether in the Viking period, Quentovic and
Dorestad, probably did so because the rivers which provided access to them
silted up, rather than because of Viking attacks. In Ireland and England, the
Vikings seem actually to have benefitted trade and promoted urbanization,
both directly by founding towns and settlements themselves and indirectly
by prompting the Anglo-Saxons to build their fortified burhs.
The most damaging aspect of the Vikings’ activities was their attacks on
monasteries, which were the main cultural centres of early medieval
Europe. Over a large area of northwest Europe, monastic life came to a vir-
tual end. Many monasteries were completely destroyed, others were simply
abandoned by their terrified monks. The monastic libraries were destroyed,
their books burned or looted for the sake of their decorated covers. Works
of art and craftsmanship in precious metals were hacked up and melted
down. Perhaps most importantly, the monks—that is the writers, artists and
craftsmen themselves—were dispersed, carried off into captivity or killed.
The revival of learning fostered by Charlemagne, known as the Carolingian
Renaissance, had collapsed before the end of the of the 9th century, while
the brilliant monastic culture of early Christian Ireland never recovered
from the Viking attacks. Whether this was a long-term setback to European
civilization is impossible to say, but the short-term damage to the cultural
life of Europe was immense.
Right; This silver ecclesiastical
chalice with gilt-bronze
decorations was made around
AD 700, and is one of the finest
achievements of late Celtic art.
Part of a board of valuables
buried during the Viking age,
presumably to conceal them
from raiders, it was unearthed
in 1868 in Ardagh, County
Limerick.The Raids Begin
ey
been seen The
church of St
Cuthbert is
spattered with the
blood
of ¢
ty
aul its furnishin
RET
any in £ 4
Alcuin of York,
Right: the Viking ratd om the
monastery at Lindisfarne is
vividly depicted on this 9th-
century tombstone from the
priory there, The attack sent
shock waves through Europe:
wiry bad God allowed such a
haly place to be defiled by
pagans? Were the Vikings a
punishment for some
terrible sin?
The peace and prosperity of 8th-century Europe was shattered by
a terrifying new threat from the sea.
Viking raids on the British [sles began in the late 780s and began to affect
the continent by 799. Initially the Vikings attacked isolated coastal commu-
nities and monasteries. Rarely defended, they were easy and profitable tar-
gets. According to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, the first Viking raid on
gland took place around 789, when three pirate ships from Norway
attacked Portland. In 792 the Mercian King Offa arranged coastal defences
for his kingdom; in the following year the famous monastery on Lindisfarne
was pillaged. The first raids on Ireland and Scotland were recorded in 7
and the first on Francia in 799.
For the first 30 years or so, the raids were fairly effectively resisted, Both the
Anglo-Saxons and the Franks recognized that the greatest danger was that
the Vikings would sail upriver and penetrate inland, The Anglo-Saxons
blocked the rivers with bridges, while the Frankish emperor Charlemagne
stationed coastguards and fleets on them, However, there was little that
could be done to protect exposed coastal areas like Frisia. In 810, the
Danish King Godfred, feeling threatened by Frankish expansion on his bor-
der, ravaged the empire's vulnerable Frisian coast: by the time the Frank
fleet and army had gathered, the raiders were long gone. Like an eat
‘
attack on the Franks’ Slav allies, the Abodrites, this was as much a show of
strength as a plundering expedition. After his death in 815, C
successor Louis the Pious at first continued to maintain effective coast
defences. However, in the 830s, the empire was riven by internal conflicts,
and its defences weakened. By 840 the Vikings had penetrated the Rhine
four times to sack Dorestad, the empire's richest port
lemagne's| healed
Steen
ATLANTIC
OCEAN |
te ‘ Ete |
& eh) ow TS my] 4S
Viking raids, 789-839 C
= oe coastal Viking attack routes 4
Charlemagne and Louis the Pious campaigns of King Godfred
ee ee «4 — Viking raid, 789-833
ches ee Manitifed a a Wiking raid, 834-9
for certain. A chain of eight Viking victory
eee |X wn
coast, but only limited = Viking camp
excavations bave been done, and — border
none has definitely been dated to
the early 9th century. = coast defence fleets
fi town sacked
a
6 possible site of Frankish fortThe Raids Intensify
“A very hard
unnier In March,
120 ships of the
Northmen sailed up
the Seine to Paris,
laying waste to
everything ...
Charles ... realized
his men could not
possibly win, So he
made a deal... by
handing over
7000 tb of silver ...
he persuaded them
to go away.”
The Annals of St
Bertin, ab 845
Civil war among the Franks allowed Viking raiders to sail
upriver and strike deep into the heart of Francia.
As soon as the Frankish emperor Louis the Pious died in 840, his three
sons—Lothar, Charles the Bald and Louis the German—fell out over their
inheritance. The Vikings were quick to exploit political weakness, and raids
became more frequent. The civil wars damaged royal authority, and the
coastal defences created by Charlemagne collapsed. The great rivers of the
empire lay open to Viking fleets which could penetrate far inland, sacking
major towns, ports and inland monasteries, From being a seasonal threat,
ihe Vikings now became a permanent presence, seizing river islands such as
Oissel in the Seine to use as bases for prolonged campaigns of raiding.
Charles the Bald’s kingdom, with its long coastline and many navigable
rivers, was hit the worst. The Vikings benefited from his internal problems;
in 843 a rebel count allied with them to seize Nantes, and in 858 his brother
Louis the German invaded, forcing Charles to abandon a siege of the
Viking base at Oissel. Charles was forced to pay ‘Danegeld’ to buy the Vik-
ings off. In the long term this only encouraged more raids, but it bought
him time to deal with his internal enemies. Sometimes the Vikings could be
a help—their attack on Bordeaux in 848 discredited the rebel prince who
controlled the city, enabling Charles to restore his authority there,
Lothar’s kingdom included Frisia and the Rhine estuary, both frequent tar
gets of Viking raids. Lothar solved his Viking problem by granting lands in
these areas to Viking
chiefs on condition that
they kept other Vikings
out. These Vikings were
unreliable allies, but
there were no raids fur-
ther down the Rhine
than Dorestad before
863. The eastern king-
dom of Louis the Ger-
man, with only a short
coastline, had litte trou-
ble from the Vikings.
England also remained
relatively untroubled by
raids. The Anglo-Saxons
inflicted some severe
defeats on the Vikings in
this period, making
England an unattractive
target in comparison to
Francia.
Right: Charles the Bald, King of
the West Franks (843-77),
shown seated on bis throneATLANTIC
OCEAN
| Europe, 840-860
| division of Frankish Empire, 843:
Kh ew kingdom of Charles the Bald
=” = kingdom of Lothar |
kingdom of Louis the German
Viking raids:
5 Norwegian attack route
F ae Danish attack route
L| 2G Viking victory
te Amp ta t 4
2 Whig dfn He | |
4S place or area ravaged by Vikings | A. Uyerhanton
7 Viking camp . Pad Creer Tees Sea sf - Sea
— be | )
+The Vikings in the Mediterranean
Viking fleets raided Christian and Muslim Spain, and struck deep
into the Mediterranean.
Only a year after they had established a base at the mouth of the Loire, the
Vikings turned their attention to Spain, A fleet of around 100 ships left the
Loire and pillaged on the Garonne before de on the Sp.
n Kingdom of Galicia and Astur Local resistance was effective,
and the Vikings moved on round Cape Finisterre, to try their luck against
the Umayyad te of Cordoba, The Vikings took Lisbon virtually unop-
“They came
aflerwards across
the plac e where te
Vedilerranecan goes
into the outer ocean
and veached Africa,
They gave battle to
the Moors, and a
great slaughter was
made... After that
the Norsemen
brought a great host
of Moors in
captivity with them
io drelane... Long
were these blue men
in Ireland.”
Duald Mac-Fuirbis
on Hastein ancl
Bjorn’s raids,
AD 850-62
KINGDOM OF
GALICIA AND
—
IDRISID CALIPHATE,River Guadalquivir and captured Seville, From there they raided the sur-
rounding countryside until, five we ter, the Vikings were heavily defeat-
ed by a Muslim army: the Muslims claimed to have destroved 30 ships, killed
1000 men and taken 400 prisoners, most of whom were later executed. The
survivors surrendered their captives and booty and were glad to escape back
to the Loire ith
r lives.
Thirteen years later the Vikings returned to Spain with 62 ships under
Hastein and Bjorn Ironsides, two of the most famous Viking leaders. At first
they had as little luck as their predecessors, being soundly beaten by both
the Asturians and Muslims as they cruised south along Spain's Atlantic
coast. However, at the Straits of Gibraltar the Vikin luck changed.
Algeciras was sacked, then the coasts of Morocco, Murcia, the Balearic
Islands and Rousillon were ravaged. They spent the winter of 859-60 on the
island of Camargue, at the mouth of-hie Rhor
as far as Valence the following spring. But
ing up the River Arno to s
are said to have to sailed
‘k Pisa and Fiesole. After this Hastcin and Bjorn
nto the eastern Mediterranean, but their move-
ments are uncertain until 861, when they were again defeated by a Muslim
The capital of Muslim Spain
was at Cordoba, where the
Great Masque (above) was
begun in 785, The Vikings
tel for thi:
sogeh ee caae The Vikings prefered ca
highly motivated state, ed, and the Vikings never re
ao - “
* R A NK I Viking raids on
KINGDOM OF Spain and the i
Mediterranean, SA
\
844-62
| Christian states
| Muslim states
Viking raid, 844
Hastain and Bjorn
Ironsides, 859—62
ell
—
‘ (Mm town sacked, B44
Ree? i , hed,
pown sacle
sea
battle
Wiking base
Muslim fortifications
against pirate raids
later Wiking raid
MonutreThe Franks Fight Back
“Charles caused all
the leading men of
hus realm to
assemble about
I fune, with many
workmen and carts,
al the place called
Pitres. where the
Andelle... and the
Fure.,. flow into
the Seine, he closed
it off to ships
sailing up or down
the river, This was
done because of the
Northimen. ”
The Annals of St
Bertin, Ab 862
By 859 Charles the Bald had survived the worst crises of his reign
and could turn his attention to the Vikings, who now posed a
serious threat to the economy of the Frankish heartlands.
New fortifications were built, Roman town walls were restored, and fortified
bridges constructed across the rivers Seme and Loire, But the bridges were
positioned well inland, and while they protected Paris and the Frankish
heartlands, they effectively abandoned the lower reaches of both rivers to
the Vikings.
Charles's army was still unreliable—it ran away from the Vikings in 866—
but his siege of the Vikings in Angers in 873 was a notable victory. He also
tried to play one Viking army off against another. In 860 he hired the ser-
vices of Weland, a Viking chief based on the Somme, to attack the Seine
Vikings at their base on Oissel. The Seine Vikings offered Weland a huge
bribe to let them escape, and the next year they were back again, raiding on
the Marne. The ngs only left the Seine in 866 after Charles had resorted
to the old expedient of paying Danegeld.
Increasingly the most effective defence came not from the king but from
local leaders. The Loire Vikings suffered a number of sharp defeats in the
860s at the hands of local counts, who could react more quickly than
centralized royal forces. By the end of the 9th century, they had
become the basis of Frankish defence. There were limits to the
devolution of defence, however, and peasant bands which had
formed in 859 to fight the Vikings were suppressed by the counts.
This stiffening of Frankish resistance certainly contributed to the
decline of Viking activity in the late 860s, but it was the success of the
Danish Great Army which invaded England in 865 that more than anything
turned Viking attentions away from Francia.
The key to Charles the Bald"s
defences for the Seine was the
fortified bridge at Pont de
VArche near Pitres. The bridge
was protected by garrisons
stationed in large forts of
wood and stone on both
banks of the river.
Construction was
862, bet work was
the unfinished br
ws ting conti
Wi the brit
forts was fina
argiénd 870, A Vik
i tered the Seine in
bridge, and the Vil
away for the next
The bridge and fort
eventually destroyed im
Viking attack in 385.
2/The fortified bridge at Pont de l’'Archeny
No 100 kms
eee erect
f a 4 oe North Sea
“MERCIA ah
He 850-873 © 866
“held as fief Roric temporarily
4 by Roric driven out
utrecht | € 863.
#860 ae er a feat
Weland defeated a, ares ao an
: : ae nea
WESSEX #,,
Se SSIES eg ‘Cologne
&
Loaf gboulogne a f ‘
Wig € 860 dees | My
Charles pays to pale
e ips ane ap KINGDOM OF
[2 ‘Quentovie™ - LOUIS THE GERMAN
ie 9860 ae ee = = —
4 lntartl cas Mikings on Se ompiegne: 7 ey
#886 Rowen =.
Seine Vikir ig? ge eat aae Bay eet 2
| to Frisia and England |
#B6S
Count Robert kills : 5
500 Wings wth) rts wih Love om :
© no Frankish attack :
ot yeas «0 orleans of silver to feave Seine na
Angers Le Mans _ AL si 4
Mi \ a Fleury % 4
© Ee 997; Totty Bourges ew
Count Robert of Angers Vikings out of KINGDOM OF
captures 12 Viking ships Angers ‘
cond kills their crews ?
Nose |, : : E£ &
va CHARLES THE BALD : |
Ree 868 Poitou
\ Aquitaine ©2864 ftreneni e ;
ae af ae
B6S@ | Clermont
Aquitainians kill f
jt = PO Vikings [S| Fertgenne
I Viking raids and Frankish
jefence, 860-78 5
|—— Kingdom of Charles the Bald, 870 . * ir ee re
@ Frankish fort :
a Frankish fortified bridge
|| saw Danish Great Army, 865
Viking vietary
F | 26 Viking defeat
Viking camp
Viking raid, 862-6
Wiking raid, 866-78
Pe BAThe Great Army in England
“In this year the
host went across
Mercia into East
. St
Edmund the king
Anglia
fought against
them, and the
they
slew the king and
Danes won ...
overran the entire
kingdom, and
destroyed all the
monasteries to
which they came,”
The Anglo-Saxon
Chronicle,
Ab 869
A great Danish army arrives in England, and one by one the
Saxon kingdoms fell to the invaders.
For most of the 9th century, England seems to have escaped the worst of the
Viking raids that plagued Ireland and Francia. But it was yulnerable—tivid-
ed into small, uncooperative kingdoms which could be picked off one at a
time, and crisscrossed by Roman roads along which an invader could move
quickly, When the Danes did arrive in force, their intention was not merely
plunder, but conquest. In 865 a “great heathen army” under the command
of Ivar and Halfdan arrived in East Anglia. The kingdom bought peace with
a supply of horses, and in 866 the Danes rode north. The Northumbrians
were preoccupied with a civil war, and the Danes entered York unopposed.
The following spring, the two rival kings united to try to recapture York, but
the attack failed and they were both killed. The kingdom of Northumbria
died with them: by 876 York had become capital of a new Viking kingdom.
In 867 the Danes forayed into Mercia. A joint Mercian-West Saxon force
besieged them at Nottingham—the only time that one Anglo-Saxon king-
dom helped another against the Danes—and they withdrew to York. The
Danes returned to East Anglia in 869, where they defeated and killed King
Edmund, bringing a second Anglo-Saxon kingdom under their control.
The next year they invaded Wessex. King Ethelrad and his brother Alfred
resisted fiercely; the Danes withdrew to London, then back to York. They
invaded Me again in 875, and the kingdom collapsed after the Danes
took the royal centre of Repton. Here the army split: Halfdan returned to
consolidate his hold on York, while the other half under Guthrum, Oscetel
and Anund went to Cambridge before invading Wessex in 875, Alfred, now
king, was forced to take refuge in the Somerset marshes. But the Danes had
been weakened by the division of the army, and by the fact that many of
their fighters had decided to settle on the lands they had won in North-
umbria and Mercia. When Alfred managed to raise another army and won a
great victory at Eddington, the Danes agreed to leave Wessex.
2/The Vildng fort at
Viking armies chose defensible
positions for their winter
defended by water or
marshland. The small camp at
Repton was built for the Great
Army in the winter of 873-4.
The river Trent protected one
eae the other
ge* a am WN
=a
a’ “o 125 fe
‘
ioe
q\/Danish conquest and
settlement, 865-79
settled by Danes:
ar
Ea «7
| 5) #
Danish attack routes:
sa Great Army, 865-73
~
leave after being paid
12,000 Ibs of sitver
~ Brittany fi i : F
‘ N Sees /FRANKISH
5 4 | | KINGDOM
Hi ¢ a
| 7 Nov 891
_| 2/The attack on the Seine, | ose Frankel King Artal.
885-92 defeats Vikings, who mave
| Viking attack rautes: 4 place attacked to Boulogne and prepare J
nea by Vildngs to invade England
@ place fortified
Ba9—90 by Franks
~~
| 890-92 Viking victory
@ Viking base 3 Frankish victory
fortified
fy * betlge
Aion fre EAST
FRANKISH
KINGDO
England ee Nantes
892 SP MMos
— Touts____
a . oe
e Mi \Wessex Defended
“Then the Eng
AIRY Greed and
put the \
army to flught and
stormed the
Jor tification
Benfleet! ane seized
everything that wa
inside it in the way
fF woods. wt
0] foe . Worter
and children. as
well... Hastein’s
sand his two
1 them back
Gian, DECHUSE OTE
CLES has godson and
the other the godson
of Raldorman
Ethetred.
The Anglo-Saxon
Chronicle, ap 893
Right: the Alfred Jewel was
made as a handle toa
pointer, intended to be used as
an aid to reading. Alfred
actively promoted education
and monasticism in the belief
that moral and spiritual
defences were as necessary to
his kingdom as physical
defences, such as the burhs.
The departure of the Great Army gave Wessex a breathing space,
and when the Vikings returned they found conditions utterly
changed.
After the Danes left for the continent in 879, Alfred reorganized the /yrd, or
peasant militia, so that it could stay in the field for longer. The royal army
also became much more mobile, and was able to react quickly to Viking
attacks. A fleet was built to challenge the Vikings on the high seas. Most
important was the construction of a network of surks—fortified settle-
ments—across the whole of Wessex. The overall effect of these measures
was to deny the Viking armies the freedom of movement which they had
enjoyed in the 860s and 870s, and make them much more vulnerable to
counter-attack, The acceptance by the Mercians of Alfred's leadership in
886 also ensured a greater degree of cooperation between the Anglo-Saxons
than had existed before.
The Vikings continued to hold the initiative, however, and had the great
advantage of being able to retreat into friendly Danish-held territory if they
suffered a reverse, The Danes of Northumbria and the Danelaw also sup-
plied reinforcements and launched diversionary raids on the coasts of
Wessex. Despite this, the two Viking armies which arrived in Kent in 892
were not destined to prosper. The only major raid into Wessex was defeated
in spring 893 and when, shortly after, the two Viking armies joined up at
Benfleet in Essex they had no sooner gone on a raid than the English cap-
tured their camp, together with their families and loot, Their ships were
either destroyed or taken to London and Rochester by the English. A raid
deep into Mercia later in the year also ended in defeat and the Vikings were
lucky to escape into the Danelaw. Late in 893 the Vikings took Chester, but
the English destroyed the local food supplies and hunger forced them into
Wales. To avoid English forces, they returned to their East Anglian base
through Northumbria in 894,
The Viking army now moved to the River Lea, threatening London, but
Alfred blockaded the river and forced it to abandon its ships and flee over-
land into Mercia in 895, After spending another winter under siege at
Bridgnorth, the frustrated Viking army broke up: some settled in
Northumbria and East Anglia, others retu
Francia. After their departure the Anglo-
Saxon chronicler heaved a sigh of relief:
“the Viking army had not—by God's
grace!—afflicted the English people
to a very great extent” he conclud-
ed. Though the English had not
won any great victories, they
had prevented the Vikings
from plundering at will,
and at no time had
Alfred's defences
looked likely to
break down,
ed toViking campaigns and
Saxon resistance, 886-96
Wessex and allies
other area under
Saxon control
Danelaw
Bee other area under
Danish control
Danish attack routes:
892
—
~~ = spring and summer 893
~<—" autumn 893-896
xr
.
Saxon victory
siege
Danish camp
o burh
7
a ‘ pir é Above: a late Saxon
ind pit) Beets manuscript illustration
depicting the defence of a
B #992 A burh. These fortified towns
80 Viking ships fram ie acted as refuges for the
C #492 a population in time of attack,
250 Viking ships from ieee guarded the main overland
D © spring 893 routes and provided bases for
2 Viking fleets from East counter-attack,
Northumbria
E @ spring 893
Vikings besiege Pilton and Exeter but
fail to take them
F # spring 893
Viking fleet under King Sigfrid of York
G to Dublin
H © spring 893 aap
Saxons capture Danish aes
pan dred out raiding. Danes \
© summer 893
English ond Welsh
Danes break out
and flee to East Anglia
| # summer 893
ao
| Haba os.The Conquest of the Danelaw
In just seven years, Wessex conquered much of the Danelaw,
creating a unified kingdom of England
|/Campaigns and
conquests, 902-16
Wessex and allies,
| 902 When Alfred the Great died in 899, Wessex was still on the defensive, His
anaes from Mercia, successor, Edward the Elder, was faced by a revolt by his cousin Aethelwold.
In 903 the rebel persuaded the East Anglian Danes to invade Mercia and
Wessex. Edward retaliated with a raid into the Danish-held Fens. Part of his
army was defeated, but Aethelwold and the Danish King Eohric
were killed. Peace returned until 909, when Edward despatched
an army to attack the Northumbrian Danes. A Danish counter-
EE conquered by
Wessex, 912—6
fees other area under
English control, $02
border of Danelaw,
902
—r ate ey paeeenent 2 attack, was defeated at Tettenhall in 910.
sau’ Anglo-Saxon artack 6g
Danish attack 5 The power of the Kingdom of York was broken, and Edward's
Dublin Vikings Situation transformed. In co-operation with his sister
Atheflad, the ruler of Mercia, he began a piecemeal but
methodical conquest of the Danelaw south of the
Anglo-Saxon victory
| Anglo-Saxon fortified rowns:
_ burh established Humber. After the Danish king of East Anglia was
Bafots 702 killed in battle at Tempsford in 917, organized Danist
25 Hieeeeebahd illed in battle at Tempsford in , organized Danish
afer #02
Danish fortified towns:
® — the Five Boroughs
resistance crumbled. Edward narrowly missed adding
Northumbria to his kingdom, The Danes of
Northumbria had submitted to thelflaed in 918,
but she died before this coup could be followed
= up, and in the following year Ragnald, a
ae Viking chief from [reland, took control of
s York and the English-ruled Earldom of
: Northumbria.
( The conquest of the Danelaw had
taken just seven years. Alfred had left
Edward with an efficient army which
could remain in the field for months
if need be, while the building of
burh was an effective way of
other forcified towneAtlantic
Ocean
2/Campaigns and
conquests, 916-20
Wessex and allies,
916
conquered by Wessex:
a7
(OY eye
OO veo
annexed by Wessex,
919
other area under
English control, 916-19
border of Danelaw,
916
_ Anglo-Saxon attack,
Sts
Danish attack, 917
er Dublin Vikings
>< _ Viking vietory
Anglo-Saxon fortified towns:
@ burh established
before 916
burh established
after 916
o
@ Danish fortified town
e
other Danish town
“[Edward] devised a mode
of frustrating the Danes;
for he repaired many
ancient cities or built
new ones in places
calculated for his
purpose, and filled
them with a
military force ...”
William of
fem \ Malmesbury
Rognald siezes
|, Kittgdom of York.
“ @ York r
Irish Sea
orthampten'@ Ci
— "Cambridge ANGLIA
Huglish Channel
Left: this 10th-century carving
of a Danish warrior, from a
stone cross in St Andrew's
Church, Middleton in North
Yorkshire, shows bim wearing
a Viking helmet and
surrounded by the weapons of
the period—a spear, round
shield, sword and battle-axe,
Tt may be a memorial to a
Danelaw aristocrat who had
been converted to
(Christianity.
consolidating every advance, But the decisive factor was Danish weakness
rather than English strength, Now that the Danes were settled, they had lost
their main military advantage over the English, their mobility, They had
crops to tend and homes to defend, and were less willing to spend months
on campaign. Edward’s achievement is often called the “reconquest” of the
Danelaw, but it was, in effect, the West Saxon conquest of England. By no
means all the English regarded Edward as a liberator—many fought with
the Danes—and his campaigns ended with the formal annenation of
English Mercia by the Kingdom of Wessex in 919.The Kingdom of York
Above: Viking York flourished
as a market for local goods
and imports from
Scandinavia, Ireland and
Germany, and its kings struck
large quantities of silver
pennies. This coin of Olof
Guthfrithssan (c. 939-41,
below) carries the pagan
symbol ofa raven-aib
outstretched wings.
From 866 to 954 York was the centre of a Viking kingdom
including most of the old kingdom of Northumbria south of the
Tees.
After they took York in 866, the Danes at first ruled through English puppet
kings, but in 876 Halfdan, one of the leaders of the Great Army, seized
power, Halfdan—the first of many Vikings to dream of uniting York and
Dublin—was killed in Ireland in 877. Little is known of his successors; some
of them are known only from their coins. Danish control came under threat
after an Irish victory over the Dublin Vikings in 902 brought an an influx of
Irish-Norse settlers to northwest England, The death of three Danish kings
at the battle of Tettenhall in 910 left the kingdom leaderless, and opened
the way for the Irish-Norse Viking Ragnald to seize York in 919,
The Irish-Norse were never to establish themselves securely, however, and
in 927 they were driven out by King Athelstan, who thereby completed the
West Saxon dynasty’s takeover of England. Olaf Guthfrithsson, King of
Dublin, tried te regain York with the support of the Scots and Strathclyde
Britons in 937, but was crushingly defeated by Athelstan at Brunanburh
(location unknown, but probably near the Humber). In 959 Olaf was back.
He conquered Northumbria and the Five Boroughs of the Danelaw in a
lightning campaign, but his victory proved to be ephemeral; by 944, York
was back in English hands. Erik Bloodaxe, an exiled king of Norway with a
mighty reputation as a warrior, returned York to Viking control for the last
1948. For the next six years he struggled for control with King Olaf
Sih on of Dublin and the English King Eadred, but it was the North-
umbrians themselves who drove him out of York to his death in an ambush
on Stainmore in 954, Eadred, apparently unopposed, took control of
Northumbria.
I/Viking Jorvik, 886-954
Most of the Scandinavian
{predominantly Danish) settlement in
York—Jorvik, as the Vikings called
tt—lay to the south af the old Roman
fort, which was the ecclesiastical and
administrative centre. This continued
to function undisturbed under the
Vikings, whose kings were often on
friendly terms with the archbishops.
Scandinavian York grew rapidly, and
settlement spread onto the west bank
of the Ouse is the 10th century. By
1000 York's population was probably
around 10,000, making it a large city
by the standards of early medieval
Excrope,
ft | main area of Scandinavian settlement
§ excavated Viking site
++ pre-Norman church60 kms
aa 2/The struggle for
York, 918-54
N Kingdom of York:
probable border, 902
temporary conquest,
919-20, 4144
temporary conquest,
340-42
Norwegian sectlemenc,
from < 900
‘Wessex and allies, 902
—— border of Wessex, 920
border of English
kingdom, 954 |
Viking campaigns:
ue Ragnald, 918-9
Olaf Guthirithsson, 940-|
ool8 :
Rognald defeats Anglo-Saxon campaigns:
Northumbrians wee Athelstan, 927
Scots me Edmund, 942-4
battle
i6 > place sacked
ee © the Five Boroughs
Rognald takes York
Be 927
6 ary
King Athelston of Wessex
| storms York and drives out
| Olaf Sihericson and Guthfith a OS North
C 9939 Paste EN aas ;
Olof Guthfrithsson retakes hie KINGDOM SPY : ‘
Kingdom of York ee i PB CBE Sea
D 9 944 ac OF YORE
English retake Kingdom of York oe @ °on7
E 9948 f | possible location of
Eric Bloodaxe takes York, “Battle of Brunanburh:
becomes last Viking king there Athelstan defeats
#,, caalition of Dublin
Vikings, Scots and
Strathclyde Britons
led by Olaf
Guthfrithsson
The
Wench
BNorthampton EAST ANGLIA
Scandinavian York
Danish contral = 866-76
Danish Kings 876-919
Norwegian Kings 919-927
Norwegian Kings 939-944
Norwegian Kings 948-954
| Norwegian kings of
% - §, Dublin make several
- ‘gttempts to contro! YorkVikings in Ireland I
Above: this small bwman
figure, an enamelled mount
from a bronze bowl, was
found in a Viking grave in
Scandinavia. It is typical of
the mary fine pieces of [risl
craftsmanship pillaged by the
Vikings, The 9th century saw
the end of the “golden age” af
early Christian [nish
civilization, which produced
treasures such as He righ
crosses, the Book of Kells and
the Ardagh chalice.
Vikings raided the coast of Ireland, sailed up rivers to strike deep
inland and established a permanent settlement at Dublin.
Ircland’s Viking age began with a raid on a church on Lambey Island near
Dublin in 795. Viking activity developed in a similar way to that in Britain
and Francia. The first phase, which lasted until around 83(
fleets in uncoordinated attacks on targets—pri ly monasteries—within
20 miles of the coast. In the 830s raiding became much more frequent, and
involved small
the fleets larger. Inland areas became vulnerable as the Viking fleets began
to sail up navigable rivers such as the Shannon, sacking the monastery at
Clonmacnoise in 836, and then into Lough Erne and Lough Neagh,
, 9th-century Ireland was divided into five competing high kingdoms,
but the high kings had little control over their quarrelsome sub-kings, so
there was no coordinated response to the raids. By 840 the Vikings had
become a permanent presence, building fortified camps, the most impor-
tant of which was at Dublin, Around this time the shadowy warlord Turgeis
provides the first evidence that Viking ambitions now extended beyond
plunder to conquest and political control, Once the Vikings began to de-
velop permanent settlements, they became more vulnerable to counter-
attack, and Irish resistance became more effective. In 847 the Vikings suf-
fered four major defeats, after which many of them moved to Francia.
The first raiders and settlers had been Norwegians, but in 851 the Danes
won control of Dublin, only to be expelled two years later by Olaf the
White, a son of a Norwegian king. Olaf made himself king of Dublin, and
under him the Vikings began to be drawn into Irish political life, alternately
fighting and allying with their neighbours. When Olaf's successor Ivar died
in 873, the Dublin kingdom entered a period of political instability. Many
Vikings left Ireland to raid in England or Francia or settle in Iceland, and
for the next 40 years Ireland saw little Viking activity.
3 r I/Viking Dublin
= Dublin, Ircland’s first true
town, originated as a
longpbort, a fortified
enclosure built by the
Vikings in 841 to protect
their ships and act as a
raiding base. Declbslin
probably developed as
centre for slave trading, |
and excavations bave |
‘gp shown that by the 10th
century it had become a
prosperous merchant and
manufacturing town.
® = major excavation
1Och-century Dublin
Expansion in | th
and 12th centuries
pre-Norman church
marshland (drained in
Anglo-Norman period)
@+85| UThe Vikings in Ireland:
the first wave, 795-873
~~" major Wiking raid
—#" Dublin Vikings, 851-2
Pree xXkK
@ 853
Olaf and Iver fram Norway
drive Danes out of Dublin
Danish attack on
Viking victory
Viking defeat
Viking camp
permanent Viking settlement
Viking raid, 795-836
Viking raid, 837-73
ale
a6
551-3 @
as3@
Norse kingdom of
Dublin foundedVikings in Ireland II
“Brodir... ran from
the woods and bnerst
through the wall of
shields, and hacked
at the king. The boy
ladk threw up an
arm to protect King
srian, fet the
sword cut off the
arm and the king’s
head, The king's
blood spilled over
the stump of the
boy’s arm, and the
wound heeled at
once.”
the death of
Brian Boru,
from Njal's Saga
The “Forty Years’ Rest” was followed by renewed raiding but
gradually the Vikings were assimilated into the Irish population.
The long respite from Vi raids which Lreland enjoyed between 874 and
$14 became known as the “Forty Years’ Rest". Many Vikings had moved to
England or Francia where raiding was now reaching its peak; those who
remained suffered a series of defeats culminating with their expulsion from
Dublin in 902. But as the opportunities for raiding in. England and Francia
declined, the Vikings turned their attention to Ireland again. Within a few
years the Vikings were re-established in strength at Dublin, Wexford,
Waterford and Limerick, and were once again raiding deep inland along
Ireland’s navigable rivers. Ireland also experienced a great deal of small
scale coastal raiding by Vikings settled in the Hebrides and northern isles,
which continued into the 12th century.
The Vikings made no lasting territorial conquests or extensive settlements.
The Dublin Vikings were frequently diverted by their ambitions to rule York,
while the Irish-Norse towns were often at odds with each other. Irish resis-
tance was often highly effective and it was only Ireland's disunity that
enabled the Viking enclaves to survive. Tradition has it that Ireland's Viking
age ended at the battle of Clontarf in 1014, when Brian Boru, the king of
Munster, defeated an alliance between Leinster and the Dublin Vikings,
though he himself was killed in the fighting. In reality, it ended more with a
whimper than a bang. Under constant pressure from the kings of Munster
in the south and the kings of Meath in the north, the power of the [rish-
Norse was in sharp decline by the late 10th century. Though the native king-
doms often sought them as allies because of their fighting qualities, they had
little influence in their own right: several times before 100 the Dublin
Vikings had been forced to pay tribute to Irish
kings as the price of keeping their indepen-
dence. By this time the Irish-Norse were begin-
ning to lose Viking identity through con-
version to Christianity, intermarriage with the
Irish and adoption of the Gaelic language; the
Irish now knew them as the “Ostmen” (men of
the east) to distinguish them from the Scandin-
avians.
Left: in response to the Viking
raids of the 10th century, the
Irish built a series of church
belltowers which could also
serve az lookout posts and
refuges, like this one on the
monastic island of Deverisl
Right: altbough the Vikings
in Lough Erne. .
had little long-term
influence in Ireland,
Scandinavian styles did find
their wey into Irish art. The
Cross of Cong was made
around 1123, long after the
Irish Vikings had lost their
independence but its
decoration still shows a
strong influence of the late
Norse Urnes style.ri
Muirchertach, king of northern
Ui Néill, ravages Hebrides in
reprisal for Viking raids
The Vikings in Ireland: conflict
and assimilation, 874-1014
area of Viking settlement:
| BBD certain
probable
trish-Norse town
Danish campaign
Irish-Norse campaign
Hebridean Viking campaign
Irish campaign
Viking victory
Viking defeat
Viking versus Viking battle
Viking raid, B74-912
Viking raid, 913-c. 950
Pa ‘ata Bot =i ae
aS eo at -~ Donaghpatrick
Connacht ‘ Kelisa *"%
Pera i Ardbrachan® 94
Meat h«
=f, Owel
ea Clonard
%
aipstee Tel Ag
Killeigh = eae 226
968-96
Mathghamain, king of —
Dal Cais, blinders
*924
Dublin Vikings’
attempt to conquer
Limerick Vikings
defeated
E @ 980, 989, 995 G @/0l4
A® 875 8 4902-17 C #9/2-27, Delo tribute paid to Mdel Brian Baru, king of
Halfdan driven off Vikings expelled 939-44, high king of Tora Sechnaill, king of Munster, defeats
from ublin by 949-52 linked and (2 sub-kings Meath Leinster-Viking comltion
Norwegians with York killed in failed
otaernist-to drive F 0999 H@1170
Vikings from Dublin tribute to Brion Boru, Dublin fails to Angio-,
king of Munster Normans.The Vikings in Scotland
Below: St Columba’s Abbey
on the island of Iona was one
of the first places in Scotland
attacked by the Vikings. As
the Norse settlers of the isles
converted by Christianity,
Viking ners became patrons
rather than plunderers—of
the abbey. By the 11th century
it had become the burial place
of the Norse kings of Man and
the Isles.
Viking raids on monasteries were followed by permanent
settlements in the Scottish islands and along the coast.
The earliest recorded Viking activity in Scotland was an attack on the
monastery of Colmeille on Iona in 795, Over the next 50 years raids contin
ued unabated around the western coasts. By the mid-9th century, however,
the emphasis had shifted from raiding to settlement. Very little is known
about the settlement process, but the first settlements probably began as
raiding bases early in the centr By 900, settlers—mostly Norwegians—
were well established in the islands and along the coast from Galloway to
the Moray Firth, In Orkney and Shetland the native Celts were completely
submerged by the newcomers, but in the Hebrides and the southwest they
were soon intermarrying with the Norse to produce a hybrid people known
to the Irish as the Gall-Gaedhil (“foreign Gael”), from which Galloway gets
, One result of Celtic influence was that many of the settlers adopt-
ianity before 900.
its 6
ed Chris
The political organization of the settlements is uncertain but, as later in
Iceland, they were probably made under aristocratic leaders such as Ketil
Flatnose who ruled in the Hebrides from around 840 to 880. Towards the
end of the 9th century, the Norwegian Vestfold kings extended their
authority over Orkney, establishing an earldom under loose royal control
They also claimed sovereignty over the Hebrides, but it would be 200 years
before their authority there was anything more than theoretical. The
Orkney earldom soon expanded, taking control of most of the Scandina-
vian settled areas of Scotland by the reign of Earl Sigurd the Stout (¢. 985-
1O14),
The most important effect that the Vikings had on Scotland in this period
was to break the existing power structures. In 800, Scotland was divided
between four ethnic groups: the Picts of the Highlands, the Scots of
Dalnada, the Britons of Strathclyde and the Anglo-Saxons of Northumbria,
All four suffered from Viking attacks, but the Scots seem to have been weak-
ened less than their neighbours. Turning circumstances to their advantage,
j an the Picts in 844, the Strathclyde Britons in the 920s and
Lothian in 973, to create the kingdom of Scotland,late #th century +
Rae: adh — — Shetland comes under
Viking Scotland, 800-1014 direct rule from Tone
[esenes ethnic groups 800 Earldom of Orkney: 3
ee area of Norse settlement, wee cH) q
9th and 10th centuries ome 6.900 a
ttlerm ae
date of se ent given ¢. 1000
| Wiking raids: aT)
Danes, 874 ee etal
: Snir |
| 5 monastery or |
at Sigurd se Mighty an = settlement raided = |
Thorstein the Red, 889-900
|
| doshed lines show conjectural raids Viking trade route
Pers ;
PORTRIU é
ER Trimmed |
Dunkeld Sg |
ely ay North
#839 904. |
ravaged by Vikings 839,866 and 903-4 Soy
i ee af Barth |
) GALL-GAEDHIL
eg | To woe
ublin
Clontarf |
i4@ 104
Earl Sigurd and
King Brodir of
Man killedScandinavian Place Names in Britain
Keld 4,
Thwaite 6
Above: placenames of Norse
origin predominate in ntuch
of northwest England.
However the survival of
Anglo-Saxon placenames such
as Kaber (ca-beorg =
“jackdaw bill”) alongside
names of pure Norse origin
such as Keld (“spring”) and
Thwaite (“clearing”) show
that the native inhabitants
were not driven owt by the
new settlers,
Below: this sundial in the
porch of St Gregory’s Minster
at Kirkdale in Yorkshire shows
the Novse settlers becoming
assieilated into the Anglo-
Saxon population, A man with
@ Scandinavian name has
restored a Christian church
and recorded the fact in
Anglo-Saxon: “Orm, son of
‘Gamal, acquired the church of
St Gregory wher it was
tumbled and ruined, and had
it rebualt from the erosend in
honour of Christ and St
Gregory” during the earldom
of Tastig (1055-65).
Placenames are the most important source of evidence about the
extent of Viking settlement in Britain and Ireland.
, such as burials, stone-
carvings or settlements, the picture would be much less complete. This is
especially true in England, where Scandinavian settlements have proved
very difficult to identify. Though many Scandinavian placenames date from
after the Viking age, their distribution gives a broad indication of the densi-
ty of Scandinavian settlement. In Orkney, Shetland and Caithness, almost
character, Scandinavian placenames are
also common in the Isle of Man, Gumbria, Yorkshire and the East Midlands;
in East Anglia, the Hebri -r extent, along the
coasts of northwest Scotland, Lancashire, Cheshire and South Wales, There
are few Scandinavian plz nes in England south of the 9th-century bor-
der of the Danelaw, and they are absent even from many areas north of it
If we had to rely only on archaeological evidence
all placenames are of Scancinav
es and Galloway; and, to a les:
Despite the Vikings’ long involvement in Ireland, there are few Scandin-
1 placenames there, mirroring the lack of literary and archaeological
evidence for Seandin ent outside their coastal bi
ing of prominent coastal features, especially around the Irish Sea,
Scandinavian names—a sign of the Scandinavian domination of
waters during the Viking age. In general, Norwegian placename cleme
are commonest in northwest England, Man and Scotland, and Danish ele-
ments in eastern England. The most characteristic Danish placename
elen as in Thurkleby (“Thurkil’s
s. A scatter-
have
an settler
sare
farmstead”), and -thorfe as in Kettlethorpe
(“Ketil’s outlying farm"), Hybrid names
incorporating a Danish perso ve and
the English element -tun, as ston
(Grim’s village”) also common in the
Danelaw. Typical Norwegian placename ele-
ments found in northern isles are
-stathiy, found in Grimista (“C n’s place”),
and -hilstadr, as in Isbister (“eastern farm”).
The Norwegian -thveit in, Brackenth
(“bracken clearing”), is co!
and Dumfries, Common Scandinavian ele-
ments in coastal placenames are -ey (island),
-holm (islet), awick (bay) and -ford (fjord).
theScandinavian placenames in Britain and Ireland
| Seandinavian placenames:
mixed Danish and
|g almost totally Norse es | prea tbe
(EI xed Gaelic and Norse fe ancien
[ERM ized Gaelic, Norse and Danish stein egies
Danish and Anglo-Saxon
Lundy — isolated Scandinavian placename border of Danelaw
archaeological evidence of Scandinavian settlement:
@ © settlement == burial « sculprure
= probable serlement == multiple burial Hf thing
‘ee insetThe Duchy of Normandy
Rollo’s Vikings, allowed to settle in Normandy as a defence
against other raiders, rapidly adopted a French, Christian identity.
In 892, most of the Vikings on the Seine crossed the Channel to raid in
England, and those who remained began to settle down. Their last major
raid—on Chartres in 911—was defeated, and their leader Rollo made a
peace agreement with the Frankish King Charles the Simple. In return for
his homage and conversion to Christianity, Rollo was made count of Rouen
(the rulers of Normandy did not use the de “ “duke” before 1006), Charles’
intention was that Rollo would prevent ings sailing down the
Seine to attack his kingdom. In th ect, the agreement was a great suc-
cess and, apart from some border troubles, the Viking threat to the Seine
valley was: permanently ended. Rollo was granted further lands around
Bayeux in 924 and his successor William Longsword acquired the Cotentin
peninsula in 933, but attempts to expand eastwards were defeated.
y other
Normandy—from Normannia, or “Northman’s Land”—owes its name to
the Vikings, but their long-term influence was slight, Placename evidence
points to fairly dense Scandinavian (mainly Danish) settlement in coastal
, but elsewhere it was very sparse: the Scandinavians were cle:
yin Normandy as a whole. The settlers have left little archaeological
evidence of their presence, indicating that they quickly adopted Frankish
material culture and burial practices. Some newly arrived settlers started a
brief pagan revival around 942, but most of the earlier settlers had already
converted by this stage, Economic ties with the north, never strong, were
abandoned by the late 10th century. Scandinavian speech probably survived
until the early 11th century. The last vestige of
ence was the presence of
a Norwegian poet at the
ducal court in 1025. Well
Above: one ofa pairof before 1066, Normandy had
Scandinavian fibulae.or become, adm inistratively,
clothes fasteners, found in a i oak
Viking grave at Pites in Culturally and linguistically,
Normandy. a French principality.
ndinavian culoural influ-The growth of the Duchy of
Normandy, 911-1051
Scandinavian settlement:
eee dense
men dispersed
. Seandinavian place names
Norman territory:
original grant, 91 |
acquired 924
acquired 933
acquired 1051
“Merman campaigns, 911-1014
\ 7A Frankish campaign, 943-5
ACPA Fe A z - . Thal town sacked
Above: William of Normandy (2 oR anders i
besieges the castle of Dinas in \ Thérouinnee® ¥ Ea
Brtamy in 1064, tm a scene Norman defeat
fromt the Bayeux Tapestry.
‘The castle is a typical motte-
and-bailey af the period, with
at wooden stockade on top of
an earth mound. The three-
pointed hanners—knoum as
gonfalons—are of Norse
origitt, as are the mythical
beasts in the tapesiry's
margins.
oes
— + ors
Viking chief “Rado”
arrives on Seine
rmandois
N
- : 6 3 kms
campaign of reconguest Chartres aseThe Vikings in Brittany
“The Northmen..
levastated all
i
Britanny...
Mathedoi, count of
Poher and a great
throng of Bretons
took refuge with
4 thelsian, king of
the Angles... But
the poorer Bretons
who tilled the soit
remained in the
power of the
Northmen,
dejenceless and
lecred rless
Chronicle of
Nantes, 919
| N
2/The fort at Camp | ; " |
de Péran hes app ss ae
The fort at Camp de Péran pebble? SP fa
was either built or occupied by 3 an on 5 SS a
the Vikings in the early 10th : mi yy a
century; weapons and pottery of Sat F |
the period have been found
there, as well as a coin from
York, Its shape and
construction ave sineiliar to
that of the round forts of
Denmark |p page 84). Its
earthen ramparts, some 12 feet
(4 metres) high, would have
been topped by a wooden
stockade. The fort was
destroved by fire some time
during the 930s, possibly
during Alas: Barbetorte’s
invasion, In places the beat
twas so intense that the clay
Blocked out of the Seine by the Normans, the Vikings invaded
Brittany and drove its nobles into exile.
For most of the 9th century, Britany escaped relatively lightly from Viking
attacks; although it suffered its share of coastal raids, the region was periph-
eral to the Vi s' main interests. The worst attacks were probably in 847
and 888, when parts of Brittany were briefly occupied, but a series of Breton
victories 888-91 won the region a 2(bveat
espite. In many ways the Vikings
were more of a help than a hinderance to the Bretons in this period. The
Frankish emperors were too preoccupied with internal problems and
Viking attacks to prevent the Bretons expanding to the south and west, and
were obliged to recognize Brittany's independence. The Vikings proved use-
ful allies; a joint Breton-Viking army attacked Le Mans in 865,
But in the 10th century, the situation changed. The settlement of Rollo and
his followers in Normandy in 911 closed the Seine to Viking raids
England the Danes were being pushed onto the defensive, Only Brittany
and Ireland remained open to attack, and from 912 the raids intensified.
Most coastal monasteries were abandoned as their terrified monks fled with
their relics and manuscripts. By 919 Brittany's defences had completely col-
lapsed: the nobility fed to Francia and England, and the Vikings under
Rognvald conquered the whole country, making their capital at Nantes. The
conquest seems to have been a purely military takeover: there is no evi-
dence of any settlement nor, apparently, did the Vikings engage in trade.
Nantes, whose position at the mouth of the Loire should have enabled it to
become a flourishing trade centre like York or Dublin, was semi-derelict
when the Bretons recaptured it.
and: in
ramparts bave become vitrified,
% [0ch-century coin from YorkiS ee eee 9 yi
[The Vikings in Brittany, 836-939 | SSS SS
. #938
= border of Brittany, after 851 Vikings {rom Nanees build fire N
I area accupied by Vikings, 914-39 0939
i ee
a” Viking raid Bretons storm fort a ; ar *
% Monastery or other church eiol4 } peantn Pa: i
* aracked or abandoned, 836-939 Dolinméd Rhea y
B® Viking capital, 919-37 Viking attack on Brittany eo c
i Viking fort ‘ ens
M® Viking ship burial
x Viking victory 936%
x Viking defeat with fleet from England
Breton reconquest, 936-9: A ;
| smut” Alan Barbetorte eS pee
L_ 3 Alan surprises party of
Vikings at @ wedding
B t oe and: executes them
. eg = ae
ee x a= ie de
: 3 Domnonee . « Sorina 3
“ii 4 7 Poher ta 3
f 912 3
y¢ Viking raid. Monks flee
with relics of St Winwaloe
- Cornouaille
~<@ulmnpe 7 ew
} = be :
abt,
Atlantic
Orean
Above: three of the weapons In 931 the Vikings concentrated at Nantes to launch an invasion of Francia.
found in the Viking fort at = The Bretons saw their chance and rebelled. Though the rebellion was put
(Camp de Péran—a longsword down the weakne f the Vikings a Re d. This ecemuraced
with a pattern-welded blade, own the weakness ~ the IRIN ES. PORUON Wal expose * 1s enenurages
and two iron spearheads. — Alan Barbetorte (“twisted-beard”), an exile in England, to lead an invasion
of Brittany in 936. Nantes was retaken after a fierce battle in 937 and the
last Vikings were expelled from their fort at Trans near Dol in 939. The
effect of the Viking occupation was disastrous for Breton independence,
however. The authority of the dukes never fully recovered, and by the 11th
century Brittany had become a satellite of Normandy,The Viking Warrior
Richly decorated weapons and lavish burials proclaimed the
status of Viking warriors; bonded by loyalty and pride, they were
the elite of their society.
Right: this carved wooden
head on the Oseberg cart
(c. 800) shows the fierce
Viking warrior of legend. The
cart is part of the rich
assemblage of grave goods of
a Viking queen in the Oseberg
ship burial from Norway.
Verv little is known about the orga-
nization of the Viking armies that
ravaged western Europe. The basic
unit was the /id, a king's or chief
tain’s private retinue of warriors.
The warriors of the lid formed a
felag or fellowship, bonded together
by mutual loyalty. Discipline was
probably maintained mainly by the
individual warrior’s fear of dishon-
our if he abandoned his leader and
companions in battle: ideally a
rior should follow his leacer to his
death if necessary. A Viking army
ply a group of dd which had
come together for a common pur-
pose. When a campaign w:
was
over the
a
army dispersed into its respective fel-
lowships to settle, go home or join another army somewhere else. Local
defence within Scandinavia was provided for by a levy system which
required all able-bodied men to bear arms in an emergency. The local
chieftain’s /id probably provided the backbone of the levies, In battle,
Viking warriors expected their kings or chiefiains to lead from the front
under their standards. In an age of primitive battlefield communications,
the standard showed warriors the direction of advance and provided a rally-
ing point in dire emergency. The most feared Viking warriors were the
berserkers, devotees of the war god Odin, Their name is probably derived
from the bearskin shirts they wore. Berserkers worked themselves into a
trance-like frenzy before battle which apparently left them immune to the
pain of wounds.
Vikings did not go out of their way to seek battle, but if there was no alter-
native the usual tactic was to form a defensive shield wall to meet the enemy
attack, Two forces could be locked in battle for hours, shield wall to shield
wall: the decisive moment came when one force lost its nerve and tried to
withdraw, or when its shield wall was broken. Casualties could be very one-
sided, as the yictors could inflict great slaughter on a Neeing enemy without
much risk to themselves. Despite the Vikings’ skill as navigators, sea battles
were rare; when they did occur, the main tactic was to board the enemy ship
and clear its decks by hand-to-hand fighting.
The most favoured weapon in Denmark and Norway was the double-edged
longsword, which was used for hacking at the enemy rather than thrusting.
Frankish swords were prized for their quality, but Scandinavian smiths were
also highly skilled, and their finest swords had a pattern-welded core to give
greater strength and flexibility, Axes are the weapon with which the Vikings
are most often associated, and these were often used as a cheaper alterna-
tive to a sword. In Sweden the
ost ComMOn weapon was the spear, with a
pattern-welded socketed blade up to 2 feet (60 cm) long mounted on anWar was the most prestigious
activity in Viking-age
Scandinavian society, and
possession of beautifully
finished weapons was an
important means of displaying a warrior's status and
wealth, The hilts and scabbards of swords were often
nichly decorated, as were ceremonial axes (right).
vhaps the commonest weapon, though, was the
r (above).
ash shaft 6-9 feet (2-5 m) long. The sockets of the finest quality spears were
inlaid with patterns in si
were also
er. Bows and arrows and fighting kni
used, The most important defensive weapon was the circular shield. Usually
these were made of wood with iron bands to strengthen the rim and an iron
boss which held the grip and could be used also as a knuckle-duster. Shields
were about 3 feet (1 m) in diameter to protect the whole body from the
neck to the thighs. Towards the end of the Viking age, the round shield was
superseded by the kite-shaped shield. Those who could afford them wore
chain mail coats and metal helmets (usually fitted with face guards), but
most warriors probably had to make do with a tough leather jerkin and a
hardened leather cap. Scale armour, probably imported from Byzantium, is
known from Sweden.
The Vikings’ success depended not on superior equipment, organization or
—most Europeans waged war in a very similar way—but on their
mobility, which kept them constantly one step ahead of the defenders.
Their fast, shallow draughted ships were ideal for lightning attacks on
coastal settlements or taking larger armies far inland along rivers. On land
the Vikings campaigned as mounted infantry, covering long distances quick-
ly on commandeered horses. By the time the local defences had been mus-
tered, the Vikings would be long gone. In the 12th century, traditional
infantry tactics were abandoned in favour of armoured cavalry.
Left: metal belmets and
chainmail coats were worn by
wealtiry chieftains even before
the Viking age; this helmet
was found in the 7th-century
ship burial at Verdel in
Sweden,IV: The North Atlantic Saga
The Viking expansion in the North Atlantic was very different
jfrom the Viking raids in the British Isles—from the start,
settlement was the main motive. Though Danes and Swedes were
involved, the settlement of the Faeroe Islands, Iceland and
Greenland was dominated by emigrants from Norway.
Above: The Vesturhont on The first explor
Ieeland’s ragged southeast
of the North Atlantic were Irish monks, whose practice
const dianld lewd haneiwuite) , ling into voluntary exile for God—had given them an
settlers’ first sight of theirnew “rivalled knowledge of the northern seas. These voyages were acts of faith,
homeland. and the monks trusted to God to bring them to a safe landfall, No doubt a
great many of them must have vanished without trace, but by around 71)
Irish monks were living on the Faeroe Islands as hermits and by 800 they
had discovered Iceland, which they called Thule, and even sailed beyond it
to the frozen sea.
of peregrinatio—
The Viking expansion in this area was originally a by-product of the raids on
the Scottish islands which began at the end of the 8th century, The environ-
ment of the isles is similar to that of western Norway, and in the first half of
the 9th century Norwegians be:
1 to settle permanently in the area, Here
they will have come into contact with Irish monks, and it was probably from
them that the Vikings learned of the existence of land to the north
Beyond the Control of Kings
In Icelandic tradition, the settlement of the F.
es and Iceland is held to
have been begun by exiles flecing the tyrannical rule that king Harald
Finehair is said to have imposed after his victory at Hafrsfjord. This isunlikely to be the whole story. The battle of Hafrsfjord is believed to have
taken place between 885 and 900 but, according to the Irish monk Dicuil,
Vikings had reached the Faeroes and frightened off the Irish hermits there
by the time he was writing in 825, The settlement of Iceland had also begun
before Hafrsfjord. The first Vikings to reach Iceland were offcourse seafar-
ers c. 860 and the first settlers began to arrive about 10 years later, at which
time Harald Finehair is unlikely to have been much more than a toddler.
Iceland was not fully settled until ¢ 930, so Harald’s rule may have played a
part in sustaining emigration, but it cannot have been the initial cause.
However, there may be a wider truth in the Icelandic tradition. The leaders
of the settlements were aristocrats of middling rank—local chieftains—
there were no jarls or kings among them. The local chieftains were the main
losers by the growth of centralized authority in Scandinavia in the 8th and
9th centuries, and the opportunity to emigrate to a new land beyond the
control of kings must have been attractive to them. The government of
Iceland, with its system of district things and the national Althing in which
the chieftains or goCar played the leading role, was probably very similar to
traditional forms of government before the rise of royal power in
Scandinavia. The only significant national official was the Lawspeaker, an
elective position with no executive authority, Decision making was a consen-
sual process and though only the goéar could vote in the Althing, the need-
ed to consider the wishes of their supporters as freemen could withdraw
their allegiance if they wished. The peaceful adoption of Christianity as the
official religion in Iceland by a vote of the Althing in 1000 was probably the
greatest achievement of this form of government.
While the go@ar were all of roughly similar wealth and status, the Icelandic
system worked well. However, the godar were not a closed class, and though
the status could be inherited, men could fall out of the class or rise into it,
In time a few pre-eminent chiefly families emerged, the consensual system
broke down and in the 13th century civil wars broke out as they fought each
other for supremacy. In desperation the Icelanders turned to Hakon IV,
King of Norway, to restore order and in 1263 the country was formally
annexed to Norway. In the end, the Icelandic colony succumbed to the
forces of centralization from which its founders*had believed they were
escaping.
A significant number of the original settlers of Iceland came from the Norse
colonies in the Hebrides, Several of the leading settlers were second-genera-
tion emigrants, the product of mixed Norse-Celtic marriages, and some
were already Christians. The settlement of Iceland coincided with a period
of strengthening Celtic resistance to the Vikings, and it is likely that this
prompted this exodus of otherwise apparently well established Norse set-
tlers—there was no hostile native population in Iceland to threaten the
long-term survival of the settlements.
Exodus to Greenland
The settlement of Greenland was probably a result of population pressure
in Iceland. Greenland was discovered accidently by a storm-driven seafarer
around 930, but its hostile, ice-bound appearance excited little interest until
Erik the Red, a man with many enemies, rounded Cape Farewell some time
around 983, looking for a safe place to spend his exile from Iceland, and
discovered the ice-free eastern fjords. By this time, all the good land in.
Iceland had long been settled. Many latecomers, like Erik himself, were liv-Right: Traditional haymaking
in the Faeroe Islands. Though
bleak and treeless, the Faeroes
hid goad pestureland for
sheep and cattle, making them
attractive to Norwegian
settlers,
ing on marginal land, so there was no shortage of potential settlers willing
to emigrate to Greenland.
Though fascinating in its own right, the Norse discovery of America
c. 1000 cannot be said to have great his cal significance. True, it is a trib
ute to the seafaring skills and adventurous spirit of the V gs, but it was in
reality the last gasp of their westward expansion. The distances were too
great, the Vikings’ numbers too few, their ships too fragile and the natives
too hostile for the brief Norse attempt at settlement to have been sustain-
able. The discovery was soon forgotten outside Iceland, and it made no con-
tribution to the later European exploration and colonization of the
Americas which began at the end of the 15th century.
The Faeroes, Iceland and Greenland are bleak and inhospitable places to
setle but they would not have appeared unattractive to a 9$th-century
Norwegian. What the settlers were looking for primarily was good grazing
land—arable farming was not important in Norway —and grass grows well
in the Faeroes and Iceland. The climate was milder in the e
than it is today, and it was possible even in
y Middle Ages
sreenland to grow a little grain.
The Faeroes and Greenland were treeless, but Iceland had abundant birch
woodland at the time of the settlement, though this was unsuitable for ship-
building. The colonies’ lack of timber for shipbuilding was a serious disad-
vantage. Once the ships used by the original settlers had dec:
could be replaced only with great difficulty, and the colonies’ vital wade
links passed increasingly under foreign control. Both Iceland and
Greenland suffered severely from the climatic deterioration known as the
“Litde Ice Age” that began around 1200. In Iceland the problem was com-
pounded by serious volcanic eruptions: the wo
1104, scattered ash over half the island and forced the abandonment of
many farms. Some eruptions caused glaciers to mel nding di
floods hing into the lowlands with heavy loss of life. Iceland’s popula-
tion, which was about 60,000 at the end of the Vi ing period, had fallen by
half by the 17th century. The Greenland colony, which had never num-
bered more than about 4000, was hit so severely that it had become extinct
by 1500. The Greenlanders were not helped by their extreme cultural con-
servatism, which prevented them learning anything from contacts with the
ved, they
from Mount Hekla in
StrOusBratthlid, Eirik the
Red's farm in the Norse
Sreenland colory’s Eastern
Settlement. By the late 10th
century the best lard in
Iceland was taken and the
food grazing of the ice-free
west codst of Greenland
attracted many
settlers.
Eskimos; to the very end they struggled to continue the farming economy of
their Norwegian ancestors in the shadow of the advancing glaciers.
The settlements in the Faeroes and Iceland were the only permanent exten
sions to the Scandinavian world to result from the Viking expansion, and in
this lies their main historical significance. Elsewhere in Europe, the
Scandinavian settlers were absorbed by the native population within a few
generations, leaving little behind to tell of their presence beyond place-
names and loan words in the local language. In the Faeroes and Iceland,
however, there was no native population, and the settlers retained an identi-
ty rooted in the west coast districts of Norway, from whose dialects the
Facroes and Iceland languages have developed. The Icelanders showed the
emigrant’s preoccupation with ori
is in their mag ent saga tradition,
Alone of all the Germanic peoples, they preserved the pagan mythology and
ig
traditions of their ancestors, and eventually recorded it after their conver-
sion to Christianity.
| 6 c=
attThe Faeroes and Iceland
{ Viking settlement of the remote, mountainous Faeroe Islands led
Iceland ‘
to the accidental discovery of Iceland.
Pte | The Faeroes are a mountainous and windswept chain of islands about 190
€ miles northwest of Shetland. According to the Faereyinga Saga, the first
: 4 Viking settler was Grimur Kamban. His second name is of Irish origin, so he
Be had probably spent some time in Ireland or the Hebrides. Most of the set-
cf tlers, however, came directly from the Norwegian west-coast districts of
Sogn, Rogaland and Agder. Setthement must have begun around 825, when
the Irish monk Dicuil complained that the Vikings had scared away his
brethren who had been using the islands as a retreat for over a century.
I/The settlement of The climate is unsuitable for crop growing, but the islands have good graz-
the Faeroes, ing and sheep and cattle rearing became the basis of the economy. To take
c. 825-1100 advantage of mountain pastures, islanders moved their animals up to aergi
ée? pre-Viking cultivation (shielings) for the summer months, The early history of the Faeroese settle-
a? pre-Viking cross slab ments is obscure, but the land seems to have been claimed by a few aristo-
Viking sevdiement cratic families who then divided it among their followers. By 895 the settle-
ee eee ments had been brought under the direct control of the kings of Norway.
3 site of Thing The Vikings had probably heard of Iceland from the Irish—later settlers
(island parliament) were to find croziers, books and other evicence of monastic settle-
T bishopric, < 1100 ee. 825 ment— but the first Norse visitors arrived by accident
traditional site of first abe rae WE z = jf ably
serlonencby Grae kaniban The first Viking to reach the island was probably
« Viking-age shieling
ee Gardar the Swede, who was blown off course on
a voyage to the Hebrides around 860. He made
idfall near the Eastern Horn and spent a
year circummavigating Iceland, wintering on
Terkel vi the north coast at Husavik. The land looked
o very promising and Gardar decided to name it
: after himself, Gardarsholm, Another accidental
early visitor was Naddod, who landed on Iceland's
east Coast after being blown off course while sailing
from Norway to the Faeroes.
Vidi OE
{ Seatac
Myhites
4d 5,
Below: according to local tradition, Grimrur Kavrban,
Kirkjubour the first Norse settler of the Faeroe Islands, chose this
sheltered bay on Funningsfjordur as the site of his
farm. The patelnwork of tiny hayfields surrounding
the modern village dates from late Viking times,
° 50 kms
ESS
0 30 milesRight: the forbidding
sontheast coast of Iceland was
he first landfall for marry of
the earliest Norse explorers of
Iceland, There were fet safe
harbours bere and grazing
was poor, so this part af
Iceland never became densely
populated, Most settlers
followed the coast westwards
fo the more favourable
western fronds.
[ A afterwards, Floki Vilgerdarson set o oO ogaland to explore the
2/The exploration Shortly afterwards, Floki Vilgerdarson set out from Rogala I
of Iceland, c. 860-70 islaridl The expedition was not a great success. Floki spent the first wnat
on Breidafjord, but because he had neglected to gather winter fodder all his
a. SA ea, livestock starved to death. The sea-ice we
0 anal
slow breaking up that spring
the bad weather forced him to spend the next winter on Borgarfjord.
Thoroughly disillusioned by his experiences, Floki decided to call the new
land Iceland. Though the name stuck, other members of his party gave
su’ Naddod the Viking
| seu’ loki Vilgerdarson
| J j
| PAPos place name associated
*
more favourable reports, and by 870 seulers began to arrive.
with Irish monks ‘
-
¢& active volcano
ARCTIC rrim
5
@ Gardar’s voyoge proves that
feeland is an island
¢
= | Floki’s first winter.
“Sea ice Wt ford -
delays his departure <>
Bad weather prevents @
Fioki from leaving. He is
forced to stay a
second winter
etreconese
on , @ Naddad blown
A aff course from
_ Foeroes
cheoe
Gardar, blown oy
from Hebrides, sights
—— @ Floki sails fromm Rogaland via Shetland «
50: rolies the Foeroes to explore Naddod's sightingThe Settlement of Iceland
Vikings chiefs settle in Iceland, dividing the good grazing land
round the coasts among their followers.
The first settlers of Iceland were two foster-brothers, Ingolf and Hjorleif.
They made a reconnoitre of the East Fjords in the late 860s, and around
870 returned to settle. Hjorleif was killed by his Irish slaves during the first
winter, but after three years exploring Ingolf made a permanent settlement
at Reykjavik, More settlers soon followed; most were from western Norway,
but there were also Danes, Swedes and Scandinavians from the Hebrides. By
930 nearly all the good grazing land had been claimed. Except in the south-
west, most of the settlements were close to the coast: the barren mountains
and lava plains of the interior were, as they still remai
. uninhabited.
The L2th-century Icelandic Landndmabik (The Book of the Settlements)
identifies some 430 leaders of the settlement period. Mostly men of aristo-
eratic background, they brought their families, personal retinues and slaves.
They took personal possession of the land, farming some themselves and
settling their retinues as tenants on the rest of their claim. Early settlements
were lawless, and disputes often degenerated into protracted blood-feuds,
The Book of Local leadership was assumed by the godar, wealthy chicftain-priests who
were well placed to resolve or manipulate disputes and offer advocacy and
protection to smaller landowners, They presided over the district assem-
blies, or Things, which dealt with local disputes. In 930 an annual all-Iceland
assembly, the Altung, was set up io deal with major disputes and establish
common laws. Iceland was divided into four quartcrs which had equal vot-
ing rights in the Althing, Only chieftains could vote, and the Althing
remained an oligarchy, entirely under their control. In LOOO, the Althing
agreed to accept Christianity as the official religion, and the first bishopric
was established at Skalholt in 1056. The system provided stable government
Icelanders,
Mth century
until the 13th century, when the concentration of power in the hands of a
few chiefly families led to civil war. As a result, Iceland came under direct
rule from Norway in 1263.
ies in Eyjafjordor, c. 1190
be north of Iceland offers a good
Viking chieftancies worked.
i, would protect less powerful
Lasiddowrmsers, ara presided fa the disesicr Thine:
Their followers, or thingmen, were free to transfer,
their loyalty from one godar to another. As a result,
chieftancies were political rather than geographical
units, and a godar’s thingmen could be spread over
awide area,
Seats of chieftains: farms of their thingmen:
@ Gudmundr ® Gudmundr
@ Gmundr Thorkelsson = @ Gmundr Thorkelsson
W@ Thorvardr Thorgeirsson = @ Thorvardr Thorgeirsson
I Jon Ketilsson @ Jon Ketilsson
district Thingsite of first Thing
873 @
ingalf makes
permanent settlement
N
c87l@
Hiorlief's slaves flee
to Vestmannaeyjar
0 75 ken
where Ingalf hunts
them down
SSS
50 miles
Below: the Icelanders adopted Christianity as
their official religion following a vate by the
Althing in 1000. To demonstrate bis adherence to
the new faith, Thorgeir, the pagan Lawspeaker,
cast his idols of the pagan gods into this
waterfall, This act gave the falls their name,
Godafoss, the falls of the gods.
287) @c870
Ingolf’s second Hijorlief killed by
winter his Irish shaves
I/The Icelandic settlements, c.870-1263
sw” Ingolf and Hjorlief, late 860s
| sue’ Hiorlief, < 870
ug! Ingolf. c, 870
a9" flight of Hjorlief’s slaves
settlement established by 930
—= regional boundary
site of Atthing, from 930
Bi bishopric, with date of foundation
,
area of pasture
. active volcaneIcelandic Literature
Medieval Iceland occupies a special place in the history of
European civilization as the home of one of Europe’s oldest
traditions of vernacular literature.
Iceland's isolation from Europe allowed its ancient Germanic myths, leg-
ends and storytelling traditions to survive, and its aristocratic social struc-
ture fostered a fascination with family history and national origins. Most old
Icelandic literature was written down in the 12th and 13th centuries, but it
includes much orally-transmitted material that was originally composed up
to 200-300 years earlier. Shortly after Iceland lost its independence to
Norway in 1263, its literary tradition began to decline, and by the later
Middle Ages it had died out. Such is the conservatism of the Icelandic
language, however, that modern Icelanders have less difficulty reading Old
Icelandic literature than modern English speakers have in reading
Shakespeare.
Old Icelandic literature consists of poetry and the prose works known as
sagas. The poetry falls into two genres, Skaldic verse and Eddic verse,
Skaldic verse is an important historical source, as these heroic poems were
composed by court poets (skalds) to commemorate the achievements of
their aristocratic and royal patrons, As such, they are hardly impartial
accounts, but are often the most contemporary sources available for some
LOth- and 11th-century events. The Eddic verses consist of a mixture of
mythological and heroic poer
composed du
taining material which may be several centuric
ng the Viking age but con-
es older. The mythological
poems, which describe the adventures of the Norse gods, are the most
important—without them, we would know almost nothing about early
Right: Egil Skallagrimsson,
from a 17th-century
manuscript of Egil’s Saga.
Brave warrior, murderer,
merchant, farmer and great
poet, Egil embodies the
contradictory faces of the
Viking age in a single, larger-
than-life character. Mary
Viking-age poems attributed
to him are incorporated into
the saga.Right: this hate leelaneic
Manuscript shows scenes from
pagan Norse arytholagy. Crt
the left is the wolf Fenrir, a
mortal enenty of the gods,
They restrained Fenrir with
chains, but at Ragnarok, the
end of the world, be will
break bis bonds and devowr
Odin, On the right is
Vegdrasil, the sacred ash tree
which supports the wriverse,
Far right: 4 page from Harald
Finebair's saga, part of Snorri
Sturluson’s Heimskringla (The
Circle of the World), Saori
wrote this monumental
history of the kings of
Norway, which played an
important part in forming the
Norwegian national identity,
around 1225. Though it
contains much legendary
material, itis ane of the major
historical sources for Viking-
age Scandinavia, This early
14th-century manuscript,
known as the Codex Frisiana
after one of its owners, Otta
Friis, is one of the finest of all
medieval Icelandic books,
Above: because ifs economy
was dependent on cattle,
medieval Iceland had plentiful
supplies of calfskin—the raw
material for vellum, the main
writing material of the Middle
Ages. As a result, books were
relatively inexpensive and
widely available, Mast
wtanuscripts were
unilluminated and given
cheap wtilitarian bindings,
like the sturdy woaden covers
of this 14th-century copy of
Nial’s Saga.
Germanic paganism. Medieval Icclanders were not ashamed of their pagan
past and, alone among the Germanic peoples, they recorded their pagan
myths and beliefs. The longest of the mythological poems, the Havamal,
(Savings of the High One) is a body of ethical teachings attributed to Odin.
Most of the sayings concern the everyday concerns of the peasant farmer,
but in others the Viking love of fame and glory shines through.
The heroic poems in the Edda are largely concerned with legendary
characters such as Sigurd the Volsung (Siegfried of the Niebe-
lungenlied), Some real figures from the Migration Period, including
Attila the Hun and the great Gothic King Ermaneric, also put in an
appearance, but they have been transformed into the stuff of legends
and their Eddic exploits bear no relation to historical reality.
The prose sagas include a wide range of genres from weighty narra-
tive histories such as Snorri Sturluson’s /Heimskringla, an epic history
of the kings of Norway, to myths, romances and supe!
However, the most original works are the family sagas, histori
novels based loosely on the personalities and events of Iceland's
’ 1ent period but mainly written in the 13th centur
a time of social and political disintegration, and family sagas probably
catered for an escapist desi
favourite theme of these sagas is the working out of a blood feud. In Njal’s
Saga, for example, bonds of kinship, personal loyalty and friendship inex-
orably draw Njal, a man of peace and goodwill, into quarrels not of his mak-
ing, with ultimately fatal consequences. The authors of the family sagas wer
much concerned with the workings of fate. This does not mean that their
characters are the pawns of blind fate, however; they control their destinies,
and meet their fates as a consequence of their own weaknesses and errors.
Compared to the chivalric romances then fashionable in western Europe,
the family
vatural tales.
This was
re to recreate a “golden age” of the past. A
sceming works written in a com-
‘aaAs ar
pellingly terse style and featuring psychologically realistic characters. The
best of them—Njal’s Saga, Egil’s Saga and Laxdacla Saga—rank among the
great works of European literature.The Vikings in Greenland
At the edge of the known world, Norse settlers eked out a
precarious existence along the sheltered fjords of western
Greenland.
Ice-bound Greenland owes its optimistic name to Erik the Red, who hoped
it would attract settlers, The first Norsemen to sight Greenland were
Gunnbjorn Ul-Krakuson and Snaebjorn Galti, around 900 and 978 nespec-
tively, All tk the barren, glaciated east coast. But around 983, Erik
discovered gion to the west, with sheltered fjords and good
grazing. He ed to Iceland to persuade others to follow him, and
in $86 set out again with 25 ships. Only 14 made it round Cape 7
Farewell, but this was cnough to found two settlements: the he
Eastern and, 300 miles further north, the Western, fo
Ad firs
and it v
sheep re
the setdements flourished. The climate was milder than today 4
even possible to grow cereals in sheltered places. Cattle and
ring was the basis of the economy, but the settle
1ents’ most
came from
g grounds to the north. Even further north, the Norse traded
with the Eskimos. At its peak, the Norse population numbered around 4000.
Che Eastern Settlement eventually included 190 farms, 12 parish churche
cathedral, an Augustinian monastery and a Benedictine nunnery. The small-
er Western Settlement had 90 farms and four churches. Between the two was
the Middle Settlement of 20 farms. The settlers were probably organized on
Icelandic lines, with Erik the Red taking a role akin to the Law-speaker.
valuable exports—walrus ivory and hide and polar bear furs
rich hunt
Above: an Bie caress of The Greenlanders lost their independence in 126] when they came under
s Norse (ireandaiibr, Dot Norwegian rule, Soon after 1304) the climate began to deteriorate, Stock-rear-
settlers were cultterally very : 2 : i
conservative and made no tng suffered and sea-ice cut the settlers off from the outside world for years at
effort to learn fromthe a time, The Eskimos began to move south and there were violent clashes
Eskimos’ long experience of with the Greenlanders. By 1410, the date of the last recorded contact,
living in Arctic conditions. Ih the ‘Raster Setilenientwurviveds Archasnlogtenl excavant
This probably contributed to 2 ¢ Eastern Settlement survived. Archaeological excavations
the settlements’ decline when — have shown that some contacts continued afier this date, but a ship
the climate deteriorated = reaching the Eastern Settlement in 1540 found only deserted farms
after 1300. and, in one of them. ngle unburied body,
2 = Ee See | 3/Eastern ]
z a rs é
Sel 1 i 6 Brow --. | Settlement
iS . se N ae = ¢.986—c. 1490
yi Z ; sty ar aot . : * farm
ieee Y + | @ farm with church
cathedral
.
© nunnery
®
monastery
2/Western
Settlement
Goda c.986—c. 1341 +
* farm
other building |
® farm with chureh ‘ a N
+ other Norse building ge ill *
= modem sectlement
aT ae? > s 0 Pimime , Herjolfsness<.900-c. 1490
s — Gunnborn, «900-930
sug’ Erik the Red, 983 and 986
"hunting and trading voyages
. Norse artifact
(9) Thole Eskimos, < 1000-1 100
all” Thule Eskimo expansion,
1200-1400
dashed lines show conjectural voyages
7Voyages to Vinland
Above: a spindle whorl fond
at L’Anse aux Meadows.
Since spinning was a female
occupation in Viking societies,
such finds show that there
were women among the
setilers,
“Leif set sail when
he was ready; he
ran into prolonged
difficulties at sea,
and finally came
upon lands whose
existence he had
EVE? suspected,
There were fields of
wild wheal growing
there, and wines,
and among the trees
were maples.”
Eirik’s Saga
Viking expansion reached its westernmost limits as seafarers from
Greenland established a foothold on the North American
continent.
The Icelandic sagas tell how, around 985, Bja
course from €
Some 15 y
Herjolfsson was blown off
nland, and made a chance sighting of land to the west.
iter, Leif ym set out from the Eastern Settlement in
Greenland to investigate Bjarni’s sight: ng to the northwest, he first
came upon a land of bare rock and glaciers which he called Helluland (Slab
Land). Sailing south he next reached a low, forested land. This he called
Markland (Wood Land), Leif pressed on still further south and spent a win-
ter in a land with a mild climate, where grapes grew wi
with salmon. Leif called this Vinland (Wine Land).
d and rivers teemed
The locations of his discoveries will probably never be established with
absolute certainty, Helluland was probably Baffin
almost cert ador. Identifying Vinland i ore difficult, The only
Norse setthement so far discovered in North America is at Anse aux
Meadows in Newfoundland, but this is too far north to fit the saga descrip-
tions. Vinland probably lay south of the Gulf of St Lawrence, the appro:
mate northern limit of the wild grapes, but north of Cape Cod, the south-
nit of the Atlantic sal
and; Markland was
ainly La
OL,
Leif's voyage was followed up by attempts to settle permanently in Vinland,
occasionally voyages from treeless Greenland to collect timber from
Markland continued as late as 1347, The only Norse artifact so far found
south of Newfoundland is a coin of King Olaf the Peaceful of Norway
(1066-93) from an Indian site at Godard Point in Maine. This is not enough
to prove that the Norse were ever there: the Indians may have obtained it by
trading with the Inuit of the Canadian Arctic, who were in direct contact
with the Norse settlements in Greenland.
=
a 30m .
Beet i; 2!The Vikin
a nN a0 ya er ee settlement * L’Anse
aux Meadows
This cluster of turf houses
could have accommodated
about 90 people, It was
occupied for no more than a
few years—from around
1000-1020, according to
radiocarbon dates. This
settlement may have served as
a base for voyages to the south;
butternuts (which do not grou
north of the St Lawrence
River) bave been found on the
site. Some fishing and Inunting
went on, ut there is no
evidence of farming. The main
activity was carpentry and
blacksmithing associated with
ship repair.
& foundations
a iron rivers
= iron slag
% other Norse artefact
« butternuts
blacksmith’s
workshop #Above: a Viking knarr of the
type probably used by Leif
Eriksson, It would have taken
a sturdy cargo vessel of this
kind to withstand the North
Allantic crossing.
I/The Vikings in North America
at Bjarni Herjolfsson, 985 *
af Leif Biriksson, ¢. 1000 A cairn of possible Norse origin
regular hunting and trade voyages fmm Norse settlement
wf secasional vayages far timber @ = stray Norse find
dashed lines shaw conjectural voyages
possible Indian artifactV: The Vikings in the East
Below: Many rune stones from
Sweden record exploits in the
east, This inscription from
Uppland is a memorial to
Ragiwald who bad served as a
mercenary in the Byzantine
arnry.
Swedish traders sailed far up Russia’s rivers to dominate the
lucrative routes to the East. Their ranks were swelled by Viking
mercenaries on their way to join the Byzantine emperor’s elite
Varangian guard. These Scandinavians, known to their
contemporaries as the Rus, gave Russia its name and its first
centralized state, before adopting the language and lifestyle of
their Slavic subjects and the religion and culture of the Byzantines.
The Viking movement east was dominated by the Swedes. Two terms are
used to describe the Swedish Vikings in the east: Rus and Veringjar, or
Varangian. Rus is probably derived from Auotsi, the Finnish name for the
Swedes, which itself probably derives from the Scandinavian rédy, meaning a
crew of oarsmen. Rus is only ribe Scandinavians living in
Russia (which gets its name from the Rus), never from the homelands,
Varangian is derived from Old Norse vdrar, pledge or oath, and means
“men of the pledge”. The name, which only dates from the mid-10th centu-
ry, probably came into use to distinguish newly
arrived Scandinavian mercenaries and traders
r used to de:
from the increasingly Slavicized Rus.
Scandinavian expansion east of the Baltic pre-
dates the outbreak of Viking raiding in the west
by more than a century. From the beginning i
vas dominated by trade and the close
vity of tribute-gathering, Scandinavian mer-
chant graves from the east Baltic trading settle-
ments at Elbing and Grobin show that the earli-
est phase of this expansion began around 650). A
hundred years later Scandinavians were living at
the Finnish market centre of Staraja Ladoga
(‘Aldeigjuborg” to the Vikings), an excellent
base for the exploitation of the northern fur-trap-
ping grounds, Up to this point, the Scandin-
avians were probably still thinking mainly in
terms of supplying western markets. Staraja
Ladoga also had a commanding position on the
river routes that gave easy access to the heart of
Russia. When, at the end of the 8th century, Arab
merchants began to penetrate the Volga, they
introduced fine quality silver coins into circula-
tion in Russia, providing the Scandinavians with
the motive to press inland to discover their
source. By the 850s the Rus, as they were now
known, had completed their exploration of the
Russian river system and had established direct
trade contacts with the Arab traders on the Volga
and with the Byzantines at Constantinople, The
Russian river system was an ideal highway for
long distance trade. The rivers Lovat (flowing to
Lake Ladoga and the Gulf of Finland), Dvina (to
the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic), Dneipr (to the
Black Sea) and Volga (to the Caspian) all haveRight: The Rus quickly
adopted the Greek Orthodox
religion of their Byzantine
neighbours to the south, while
maintaining trade links with
their Scandinavian
homelands. These Byzantine-
style Christian artefacts found
ng within a few miles of each other in the hill
gorod. Except for short distances where ships had to
ried or drawn and—from the he
il Was po!
aughted Viking ships all the way from the Baltic to the pian or the
Black Sea.
Novgorod and Kiev
Though trade the main driving force behind this mov
aceful. The routes through Russia were dangerous
by the local Slavs or steppe nomads, especially at
vuth of Kiev where boats had to be drawn
m ollowed the routes the traders had pio
antinople and the Islamic lands around the
Caspian Sea, though without conspicuous success. It is also unlikely that theAbove: The lure of Arab silver
was the driving force of
Swedish expansion into east-
em Europe. The thousands of
Arab dirbems found in
boards, such as this one from
the island of Gotland,
represent only a fraction of
the wealth that flooded into
Scandinavia from the east
during the Viking age,
Rus state based on Kiev and Novgorod, which developed in the second half
of the 9th century, was established without subjugating the neighbouring
Slavs first. According to the 12th-century Russian Primary Chronicle, the
Varangian Rus first made the Slavic and Finnish tribes of Russia into tribu-
taries, but were then driven out. However, disputes among the tribes per-
suaded them to invite the Rus to come back to rule over them and keep
order. Around 862, three brothers arrived with their kinsfolk. The eldest,
Rurik, established himself at Novgorod, the second at Beloozero and the
third at Izborsk. When his brothers died, Rurik became ruler of the whole
of northwest Russia,
Some time later, two Rus chieftains from Novgorod, Askold and Dir, sailed
down the Dneipr and captured the hilltop town of Kiev. Novgorod and Kiev
were rival Rus centres until Rurik’s successor Oleg captured the town and
made it his capital around 882. Though the story of the Slavs’ invitation to
the Varangians was no doubt invented to give the authority of the Kievan
dynasty a legitimate basis, in general outline it is probably accurate. After a
period of tribute gathering, independent Rus leaders took control of the
trading settlements of northwest Russia, from which they subjugated the
surrounding Slav population, Eventually the ruler of Novgorod (probably
Rurik, though his existence is doubted by some historians) was recognized
by all the Rus, but two leaders broke away and established a rival centre at
Kiev which was later captured by Oleg, who made it his main residence.
The importance of the Scandinavian contribution to the development of
the Kievan Rus state is the most controversial issue in the history of the
Viking expansion in the east. Unfortunately the subject has been bedevilled
by competing national
$s and, in the Soviet period, by political ideology—_
there are some Russian historians who would maintain that the Rus wereSlavs. However, the ori
doubt, as the Annals of St Bertin, the earliest source to mention them, make
clear in their account of an embassy which was sent to Louis the Pious from
inal Scandinavian identity of the Rus is not in
the Byzantine Emperor Theophilus in 859; “[Theophilus] also sent with the
envoys some men who said they—meaning their whole people—were called
‘Rhos’ and had been sent to him by their king who was called Khagan for
the sake of friendship, so they claimed. When the emperor [i.e. Louis] inves-
tigated the reason for their coming here, he discovered that they belonged
to the people of the Swedes.” (The Annals of St. Bertin, J.L. Nelson,
Manchester University Press 1991). A slightly later Arab writer, Al-Ya’qubi,
also identifies the Rus as being of the same race as the pirates who attacked
ate—Rurik,
Seville in 843-44. The names of the earliest rulers of the Rus s
Oleg (Helgi) and Igor (Ingvar)—are also clearly of Scandinavian rather
than Slavic origin.
There can be little doubt then that the first rulers of the Kievan Russian
state were Scandinavians, and that it was their initiative that led to the cre-
ation of the state as a political entity. It was also largely due to the activities
of Scandinavian merchants that Russia experienced rapid urban growth in
the 10th century, For example, the Rus transformed Novgorod from a
minor Slavic settlement on the island of Gorodisce into a major fortified
market centre in the 9th century, before moving the whole settlement to a
larger fortified site (the “New Fortress” from which the city gets its name) a
few miles to the north in the LOth century.
Because of the Scandinavian connection,
early Kievan Rus also had wider ranging
connections with the rest of Europe than
any succeeding Ru
before the 18th century.
Right: The Rus travelled as far
as the Black and Caspian
seas, where they traded with
Arab merchants of the
Abbasid caliphate. Arab ves-
sels of pottery, silver and
bronze have been found at
Viking settlements in Russia.
an state would enjoy
Scandinavians and Slavs
It is doubtful, however, that Scandinavian
influence played much part in shaping the
cultural development of Kievan Rus.
The Slavic peoples of eastern
Europe were at a very similar level
of social and technological devel-
opment as the Vikings. They were
skilful ironworkers and craftsmen,
active traders and efficient farmers
while many of their fortified setile-ments were fast approaching true urban status. They may have lacked the
unity and purposeful leadership of the Rus, but they had very little to learn
from them. Indeed, the limited nature of Scandinavian cultural influence
on the development of early Russia is immediately obvious from the fact
that there are only six or seven Scandinavian loan words in the Russian lan-
guage. Neither is there any apparent Scandinavian influence on early
Russian law, institutions or religion.
In fact the most important cultural influence on Kievan Russia was not
Scandinavian but Byzantine. Prince Vladimir’s conversion to Orthodox
Christianity in 989 opened Russia to the powerful civilizing influence of the
Byzantine Empire, and ensured that the country would develop a cultural
identity which was quite distinct from the Latin-influenced west. Kievan
Russia’s alphabet, literature, architecture, music, art, law, education system
and political ideologies were all fundamentally Byzantine in origin.
Though the Scandinavian presence in Russia is well attested archaeological-
ly—for example, the 187 Viking oval brooches found there far exceeds the
number found in western Europe—it is clear from the evidence of Viking-
age cemeteries that the Rus were a minority among the Slavic population
even in the towns—and there is no evidence at all of Scandinavian rural set-
Uement. The Rus must have formed a warrior and merchant elite, but
despite a stream of new arrivals from Scandinavia continuing into the 11th
century, they became increasingly influenced by the Slavs, with whom they
intermarried and allied. A sign of this is the adoption of Slavic names by the
ruling dynasty. The first Rus ruler to have a Slavic name, Igor’s son Svyato-
slav, came to power in 945 and his son Vladimir (978-1015) worshipped the
Slavic god Perun before his conversion to Christianity. By the mid-10th cen-
tury, Slavs formed an important component of Rus armies, and even num-
bered among the commanders. There was still a distinction between the
language of the Rus and that of the Slavs at this time, but Slavic speakers
must have been the majority among the ruling classes because Slavic
became the language of the church after the conversion to Christianity in
989. Certainly by the 11th century the Rus were, to all intents and purposes,
Slavic in language and culture. In all the process of assimilation to the
native population had taken about 150 years to complete: about the same
length of time as it took for the Viking settlers in England to lose their
Scandinavian identity.
Dynastic links with Scandinavia remained strong in the 11th century, and
Viking warriors continued to pass through on their way to join the
Varangian guard at Constantinople, but the merchants were mostly gone.
The exhaustion of the Islamic world’s silver mines between 965 and 1015
led to the decline and eventual abandonment of the trade routes to the
east. After 1066 fewer warriors came, and the ranks of the Byzantine emper-
or’s Varangian guard of “axe wielding barbarians” were increasingly filled
with exiled Anglo-Saxons.
Vikings in the Baltic
Perhaps the area of Viking activity about which least is known is the Baltic,
which in the 9th and 10th centuries must have been something of a Viking
lake. The paucity of our knowledge is due to the lack of contemporary writ-
ten sources for this period; the Slavs and Balts who lived on the south and
east shores of the Baltic were illiterate, while the Vikings’ own runic alpha-
bet was only suitable for short inscriptions. Nor were western EuropeansBelow: These Viking runes
were probably carved into the
polished marble of the
cathedral of Hagia Sophia in
Constantinople by a member
of the Byzantine emperor's
elite Varangian guard. The
inscription bas not been filly
deciphered but it includes the
rane Halfdan.
much interested in Slav-Scandinavian relations before the late 10th century.
The West Slavs or Wends had a large number of trading towns along the
southern Baltic coast, and finds of large quantities of Arabic silver coins
show that they were tied in in an important way with the Baltic and Russian
trade routes. The Wends were warlike, and though the Danes and Swedes
occasionally managed to take control of a trading town on the coast, such as
the unidentified Reric in the early 9th century, they made no headway
inland. Later saga accounts speak of great Vikings like Olaf Tryggvason cut-
ting their teeth on raids in the Baltic against the Slavs and Balts, and there
can be no doubt, even in the absence of more reliable sources, that they did
suffer a great deal of Viking raiding. However, the most famous Vikings of
the Baltic, the Jomsvikings are almost certainly legendary, The Jomsvikings
are said to have been a sworn fellowship of elite Vikings who sold their ser-
vices to the highest bidder. Somewhat improbably, judging from what more
contemporary sources have to tell us about the Viki appetite for the
opposite sex, women were forbidden to enter their fortress at Jomsborg—
probably Wolin, at the mouth of the Oder, Excavations have shown that in
the 10th century there was a fortified trading settlement and Slavic cult cen-
tre there, with a population that included Scandinavians as well as Slavs. It
does not quite live up to the saga description of a great fortress with an arti-
ficial harbour for 360 ships, but perhaps a band of Scandinavian mercenar-
ies serving a Slavic prince there might have given rise to the legend. There
was a certain amount of cultural interchange between the West Slavs and
the Scandinavians, The Scandinavians may have learned bridge-building
techniques from the Slavs, while they learned shipbuilding from the
Scandinavians. In this the Slavs had decidedly the better part of the bargain,
and in the 11th century they applied their new found skills to give the
Scandinavians a dose of their own medicine.The Swedes in the East
“The Chuds, the
Krivichians ar
the. Ves then said to
the people of the
“Our land is
preat and rich, but
Rus,
there is no order in
at ome to rude
and rei
ouer Tes
Russian Primary
Chronicle,
« 1113
Below: this manuscript
illustration, from the work of
the Byzantine historian Joba
Seylitzes, shows a Russian
attack on Constantinople
being driven off by
Byzantine cavalry,
Heal cyl Hingy me Termeni The
Sha Wat Atay Te
Scala ae Km A aa om Fe
snort pare Te
Pagee Ho arrmeAmbe
ma Oe a ita:
‘ead aes Me RTE ML *
Epa Ane cay Tle Tce pee TH
Ce waar ate: saenaene meervalse ci Tan wey!
et a.
re eae
Swedish adventurers travel along the rivers of Russia to found a
trading empire stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea,
While the Viking expansion westward was dominated by Danes and
Norwegians, that to the east was dominated by the Swedes. Known as the
“Rus”, m the Finnish word for Swede, they even
ally gave their name to
the Russian state. Their castward expansion was motivated primarily by the
desire to control trade routes. It began well before the start of what is nor-
mally regarded as the Viking Age: even before 70), Slay and Balt towns such
as Elbing and Grobin had significant permanent Scandinavian populations,
and by the mic-8th century, Scandinavians were living at the Finnish settle-
ment at Staraja Ladoga on the River Lovat. By the early {th century, the Rus
were navigating the Volga and the Lovat-Dneiper river systems to make
direct trading contacts with the Abbasid Caliphate
Empire
ine
ar to the south,
During the course of the 9th century the Rus
founded merchant towns such as Novgorod, or
won control of existing Slav towns such Kiev and
used them as bases from which to subjugate their
hinterlands, By the 860s Novgorod had emerged
nire unde:
s common
s semi-leg-
garded as
Around 882
the founder of the Ru
Oleg. Rurik’s kinsman and or, took con-
trol of Kiev and made it the capital of a state that
stretched from the Gulf of Finland almost to the
Black Sea. Though the Rus gave their
Russia, nowhere in the vast Kiev tate w
Scandinavians in a majority. Even the towns were
predominantly Slavic in character, and there is
no evidence of Scandinavian rural settlement.
The Rus were a military and merchant elite who
pat natahe gta: + Wiles Tarticlaal risa: map
sbab eum mapal vom *
cmap rw corer {bes
Taya
Tru ELE tp Ej paper Te era gee me fe TY
Fae reps Saye Wee ee day
iemraisuses yaige teste leadThe Swedes in the exacted tribute in furs and slaves from their Slav subjects to trade with the
East, 800-913 Arabs for silver,
Slavs, c. B00
|
| area under Rus
LS control by 912
Once established at Kiev, the Rus were within easy striking distance of the
Black Sea and its rich coasts. Like the Vikings in the west, the Rus were not
| inclined to trade if they thought they could take what they wanted by force,
‘ ee and in 860 and 907 savage but unsuccessful attacks were made on the
population Byzantine capital Constantinople. The second attack was followed by trade
main lines of Swedigh treaties in 907 and 911. Viking fleets also penetrated the Caspian Sea. The
7" penetration greatest of these raids was in 912-13, and followed an agreement by which
, Askold and Dir, the Rus agreed to share half the plunder from the expedition with the
c B60 - : Pr at ‘ ; :
Khazar khan in return for permission to sail through Khazar territory, The
a Oleg 07 Rus found the Muslim lands around the Caspian Sea virtually defenceless,
“ar Rus fleet, $12-13 but news of their atrocities so outraged the Khazars that they went back on
7 portage their agreement and ambushed and destroyed the Rus fleet on its way
‘w’ battle home.
os
hs | 4,
| Above: a Byzantine bronze
| coin depicting the Emperor
“Leo VI, hows as “the Wise”
(r. 886-912), Having driven
ofa Viking attack on
__ Constantinople in 907, be
recognized the fighting
qualities of the Res, and
included provisions for
recruiting them as mercenaries
in the 911 treaty.
KHAZAR
912-13 KHANATE 13%
500 Rus shi ars ambush and
hs aN destroy Rus fleet!
ere
Black
Ae a ~
#07 ee 2 soos 7
t Prince Oleg of Kiew atteekes Constantinople ABB ASTD, icna
cinople® with large fleet of Rus-and Slav allies CALIPHATE
ot e007 k OT i ae
BYZANTINE, dey de vecies EMPIRE
CaN th Conatcnenopie, MeeeFrom Scandinavian to Slav
“T have never seen
more perfect
}
filiysical specimens,
fetid 8 date 4 WLS
blond and rudeady
They wear neil her
tunics nor kaftans,
but each man wears
a cape which co
one side of has body,
leawing one hand
eauing one hand
free, ch man luis
an axe, a swore,
» and
and tf
Py filam
They
st Cf
keeps the
al all limes...
ave the filil
God's creatures.”
the Arab
merchant [bn
Fadlan meets Rus
waders at Iti, 922
Like the Vikings in the west, the Rus were absorbed by the peoples
they conquered, and in a few generations they adopted Slavic
names and culture.
The process of the a
Oleg's successor Igo
milation first becomes apparent in the reign of
(913-45). The Rus signatories to the trade
agreed between Oleg and the Byzantines in 911 had all had Scandin
names; but when Igor agreed a similar treaty with Byzantium after his
unsuccessful attack in 944, several of the Rus signatories had Slav names,
Igor was the last Rus ruler to have a Scandinavian name (Igor is a variant of
Ingvar): the me of his suce atoslay (945-72) is Slavic. Many
Scandinavians still fought in Svyatoslav's armies, however, and he him
was the epitome of a pagan Viking conqueror. He campaigned against the
Khazars and the Volga and Danubian Bulgars, adding huge areas to the
Kievan state, but these were all lost after his death. By the reign of Vladimir
1 (978-1015), Slavonic influence came to dominate the Kievan state. With
the adoption of Orthodox Chris ity as the state religion in 988,
Byzantium became the main external influence on Russian develop-
ment. By the time Kievan Rus reached the zenith of its power in the
reign of Yaroslay the Wise (1019-54), the Rus were thoroughly
Slavic in character,
sor Svy
oa
Around 965 the flow of Arab silver through Russia to
Scandinavia began to dry up as the Muslim world’s silver mines
became exhausted. The Scandinavians sought new sources of
silver, and a new wave of Viking raids erupted in the west. This
time, Swedes took part, and by 1015 they had abandoned their
eastern trade routes. But the memory of the wealth of the { per-
sisted for another generation, and around 1041 Ingvar the Widefarer,
a Swede, made a famous attempt to re-open the trade routes with the 7
Arab east. A remarkable
group of runestones in
central Sweden com-
memorate many of the
men who died with
Ingvar when his expedi-
tion met with disaster
in “Serkland”, probably
somewhere in central
Asia.
Right: the Golden Gate at
Kiev was built during the
reign of Yaroslaw the Wise
(1019-54). Although defensive
ft form, its grandeur suggests
that its main purpose was to
advertize the wealth and
power of Kiewan Rus. (The
church on the second storey
was added at a later date.)lm COR: this 1 tth-century fresco
The growth of Kievan Rus, fom the cathedral of St Sophia
912-1054 in Kiew depicts Elizabeth, the
daughter of Yaroslav the Wise.
By this period the Rus bad
adopted Slav ways and
Byzantine religion, but ties with
Scandinavia were still strong. A
area under Rus contra:
Kievan Rus 912
—— «4772 (including temparary gains}
nil steady stream of Scandinavians
Pius campalans: fought for the princes, or passed
igor, 941 through on their way to join the
Byzantine emperor's elite
Varangian gnard in
Constantinople, One of these
was Harald Hardrada
( pages 124-25), who
married Elizabeth,
"unidentified Rus, 943
—" Svyatosiav, 971—2
“Ingvar the Widefarer, . 1041
dashed lines show conjectural voyages
= area from which Ingvar 5
crews were recruited
ee Is |
= but his fleet is deere by
wre he | Byzantines using Greek fire
\ 8 1043
“—
Ayzontines i in Jost attack
on Congeintinaple
coe e a
u xa survivors attempt to return
home overland but are
coptured or killed at Varna
-
ae
Biack
Sea
mae sack and hold Bardo for
= months:
“i ie een eee ge
oo = “ co ©VI: The Transformation of the Vikings
Below: These 12th-century
walrus ivory chesspieces were
found on the island of Lewis
in the Outer Hebrides, This
group—the king and his
consort, supported by the
church and the warrior
aristocracy—is a microcosm
of the early medieval
Scandinavian state.
The Vikings made a dramatic impact on Europe, but in the long
term the impact of Europe on the Vikings was far greater. Between
1000 and 1200, Scandinavia was integrated into Latin
Christendom, but before the Vikings settled down completely, there
was one last burst of raiding and conquest.
This final upsurge of Viking activity sprang from two causes. The more
important of them was probably the continuing centralization of authority
in the Scandinavian kingdoms, a process which was now spreading to the
Earldom of Orkney and the Kingdom of Man Kingship was getting more
and more expensive, but royal government was not developed enough to
raise regular, reliable income from taxes. Predatory expeditions were there-
fore needed to raise revenue. The other major cause was the progressive
exhaustion after 965 of the silver mines of the Islamic world. This led to the
decline and abandonment of the
stern trade routes, and ended the flow
of Arabic silver which had been the main fuel of the Scandinavian economy
in the 10th century. Renewed raiding in the west was a means to find a new
silver supply. The decline of the trade routes and the growing power of
Kievan Russia must have made freebooting in the east both less profit:
and increasingly difficult, and for the first time, many Swedish Vi
joined the expeditions to the west.
The new wave of attacks concentrated mainly on the British Isles, and v
initially old-style small scale pirate raids on vulnerable coastal communAbove: The suppression of
piracy in the Baltic by the
12th-century Scandinavian
kings aided trade and led to
the growth of sete towns sich
as Visby on Gotland.
tern England. The main source of these raids was
the Norse settlements in the northern and western isles of Scotland, and
they would continue into the 12th and 15th cent
Viking raiding elsewhere
cs, long after the end of
This was a region of highly fragmented and com-
peting power structures: in Ireland, the many petty kingdoms and the inde-
pendent Norse towns; the Welsh principalities; the Kingdom and Man and
the Isles and its rival the dom of Orkney
It was also an arena for compe-
tition between the emerging centralized kingdoms of England, Scotland
and Norway, which all had ambitions to extend their authority into the area,
In such circumstances Viking freebooters like Svein Asleifarson from
Orkney could prosper after they had been suppressed in more settled areas.
Ape onal royal forays, such as King Magnus Barelegs's expedi-
tion in 1098, these raids had no political objectives, and were merely an
unpleasant nuisance. Neither in England, Wales nor Ireland did they threat-
en any permanent Viking conquest: only in Scotland were any territorial
gains made.
The same could not be said of the raids on eastern England from Denmark
and Norway. These too started out as small-scale pirate raids, but in the 990s
they were escalated by Olaf Tryggvason and Svein Forkbeard into methodi-
cal plundering and tribute-gathering expeditions by professional armies.
Svein was the reigning king of Denmark, Olaf aspired to the kingdom of
Norway, but the new style centralized monarchy was expensive to acquire
and maintain, and for both men Viking raiding was a means of financing
their ambitions. Olaf briefly achieved his ambition before being killed in
battle in 1000, but Svein survived to become the most successful Viking
leader so far. Though they probably involved rather larger armies than
those of the 9th century, these attacks may not have been particularly
t from ocSee
speagempiucray
AS a SOs
KECALALS
iat 7 Above: Pagan imagery
survived well into the
Christian era in Scandinavian
nt art. This 12th-century
J i} tapestry, from Skog church in
ee
Sweden, shows Odin (on the
A left), Thor with bis banmer
(centre) and the fertility god
Freye bolding an ear of com
(right).Above: Though actively
promoted by Migs frome
around 1000 onward,
Scandinavia was not
thoroughly Christianized snril
the 13th century, when this
stave church at Kanpane,
Sognefford, Norwiry, was
built. The stave-building
method of construction was
first used in the late Viking
age for domestic buildings as
well as churches.
destructive—once they had demonstrated their superiority over the English
defences, the armies were usually content to be bought off by huge
Danegelds ng from 24,000 Ibs. of silver in 1002 to 48,000 Ibs. in LOL2,
Lacking a revenue-
1ising machinery at home, Svein had become a parasite
on the English kingdom's efficient administrative system, which raised these
sums without apparent difficulty. By 1012, English morale was collapsing,
and in a final campaign Svein conquered the country and was accepted as
king of England in 1013. He did not live to enjoy his triumph but, after
putting down a revival of English resistance, his son Cnut inherited the
kingdom in 1016.
The Triumph of Cnut
Cnut’s conquest was essentially a political takeover. England saw the intro-
duction of a new ruling class, but there was no widespread Danish settle-
ment as in the 9th century. Even after over 30 years of raiding, England's
resources were far greater than those of any Scandinavian kingdom, and
though he went on to become King of Denmark and Norway and overlord
of Sweden, Cnut's power base was always England, Cnut recognized the
institutional superiority of the kingdom he had conquered: he adopted the
trappings of Anglo-Saxon Christian kingship and became a generous bene-
factor of the church in England and Scandina This made Cnut the f
Scandinavian king to be accepted as an equal by the other Christian rulers
of western Europe—an acceptance powerfully symbolized by Cnut’s atten-
dance at the coronation of the Emperor Conrad in Rome in 1027,
Cnut failed to give his empire any institutional coherence; it fell apart afterLeft: Viking influence
persisted in England long
after the Vikings had ceased
to be a threat, This Norman
archway at Kilpeck church,
Herefordshire, is
extravagantly decorated in the
late-Viking Urnes style.
his death, and in 1042 the native dynasty returned to power in England.
However, a claim to rule England was inherited first by the Norwegian King
Harald Hardrada and then the Danish Kings Svein Estrithson and Cnut IV,
All three intervened unsuccessfully in England in pursuit of their claims:
only after the failure of Cnut IV's expedition of 1085 even to set sail, and his
subsequent murder, was the Viking age in England truly over.
The Twilight of the Viking Age
In the rest of the British Isles the Viking age faded away more imperceptibly
as the Norse settlers gradually assimilated with the native Celts, Piracy and
raiding, in ships very little different from those the Vikings used, continued
to be a way of life in the isles until the 17th cent y, but as part of the Gaelic
way of life,
After the break-up of Cnut’s empire, Sweden recovered full independence,
while Denmark passed briefly under Norwegian rule until the accession of
Svein Estrithson in 1046, Svein’s claim was challenged by the new
Norwegian king, Harald Hardrada. Years of destructive and ultimately futile
warfare followed, but by 1064 Harald reluctantly accepted Svein as ruler of
Denmark. The process of progressive centralization, which had begun
before the Viking age, had finally reached a state of balance and would go
no further until the Union of Kalmar in 1397. Denmark, Norway and
Sweden had become stable territorial kingdoms, each lacking the resources
permanently to dominate the others. To varying degrees, all three king-
doms still lacked internal stability. Even Denmark, which had the longest
tradition of unity, suffered long civil wars in the 12th century and was even,
very briefly, divided into three parts in 1157 after a particularly inconclusive
conflict. Norway too was frequently subject to civil wars, but by the mid-13th
century it had emerged as the most stable of the Scandinavian monarchies
after abandoning the traditional elective principle which so often led to suc-
cession disputes, In its place the monarchy had adopted the theocratic prin-
ciple which also formed the basis of the powerful French and English
monarchies, ng by right of inheritance and divine appointment. Unity
came last to Sweden: the Svear and the Gétar were not permanently united
under one king until the reign of Knut Erikson in 1172.
A crucial factor in the consolidation of all three Scandinavian kingdoms was
the adoption of Christianity. Those kings who first created united king-
doms—Harald Bluetooth in Denmark, Olaf Tryggvason and Olaf
Haraldsson in Norway and Olof Skétkonung in Sweden—were all remem-
bered as much for their missionary activities as for their other achievements.
Christianity had many advantages for a king intent on centralizing authority
in his kingdom. Christianity brought a new ideology of divinely ordained
kingship which helped to raise the king above his subjects, Conversion also
made relations with the Christian kingdoms of western Europe easier. The
church brought with it able and literate administrators who could help in
the creation of effective royal governments. The foundation of bishoprics
helped not only the propagation of the faith, but also created new admin-
strative centres. An efficiently administered kingdom made the raising of
revenue from taxes, tolls and fines easier and more reliable, and reduced
the king’s dependence on more hazardous means of acquiring wealth such
as plundering expeditions. The growth of royal government also offered the
ambitious a peaceful route to the acquisition of wealth and status through
service to the crown: the process of centralization which had originally
made Viking raiding so attractive as a means to these ends had by the lateBelow: The death of Olaf
Haralesson at the Battle of
Stikelstad in 1030, from a
13th-century leelandic
manvscrpt, Olaf actively
promoted Christianity among
his sujhects; the brutality of
his methods was no obstacle
to his canonization soon after
bis death.
mytny Meetry
+ PE hopéu or
be; 28 Flom
Bofn 25h
meee
ge et
Pre ed
= i ee A
Be
abet
shar Bean
1th century made it unneccessary.
Though the church was jealous of its spiritual authority and could some-
times bring unwelcome interference in internal affairs from the papacy, it
was aware that a strong monarchy made its own task of conversion easier,
and kings could usually rely on the church to help increase royal authority,
The boundaries of bishoprics and archbishoprics helped to define the bor-
ders of the Scandinavian kingdoms. For example, the archbishopric of
Uppsala founded in 1164 included the bishoprics of both Svealand and
Gotaland as well as the bishopric of Abo in Finland, prefiguring by some
years the boundaries of the medieval Swedish kingdom, By replacing a
diversity of local practices and beliefs with a uniform religion, Chi
could also act as a unifying influence and help create a common identity,
However, it would be the late 12th century before the Scandinavian king-
doms were thoroughly Christianized. While those who were anxious for
political advancement were quick to follow their kings’ examples, paganism
lingered among the ordinary people, especially in Sweden where the great
cult centre at Uppsala, only 18 miles (30km) from the royal Christian cen-
tre at Sigtuna, was probably still in use as late as 1110.
unity
That Kv einen
Bhevbr. ‘F Wen
cet & 38h bs
‘tp ¢ Ranma B's
| pa % fignning Bp
2 daubett ms p BB f
y DARPA QE wir cvistet @ f voce es
ont Gor plate afin is sbetmal ett
a. pat ae live Pen open eheidmmb wena +
e 28
Biolfe ee Snow eodta ot nel na ier é, jotta aarpEurope’s Last Pagans
Scandinavian expansion, which had come to an end after Cnut’s triumph,
began again towards the middle of the 12th century. The kingdoms of west-
ern Europe were now too strong to challenge, but south and east of the
Baltic were the still pagan west Slavs or Wends and the Baltic and Finnic
peoples. The Wends were active and skilled pirates, and the Danes in partic-
ular had suffered greatly from their Viking-style raids. At least to begin with,
it was self-defence as much as religious fervour that led the Danes and the
Swedes to become involved in the crusades to conquer and convert
Europe's last pagans. The Norwegians too turned their energies to crusad-
ing, but were more likely to go to the Holy Land. Although many of the
campaigns in the Baltic were indistinguishable from Viking raids in the tac-
tics employed, they were an integral part of the wider European crusading
movement and a clear sign of Scandinavia’s entry into the mainstream of
Europe.
ote
7%
|
aie)
i -
Sal ee ss ‘ey te Pe ‘ (AS ae Mi :
- J ae ‘ak . } pig of 7m Se
4 Pt [
Right: By the 12th century,
Scandinavians like this knight
on a gravestone from Vejerslev
in Denmark were
participating in crusades to
the Holy Land - evidence of
their entry into the political
and cultural mainstream of
medieval Europe.
——
cll ee
“t
Ray : ; ~ (—— = %y = oan - fate
4 See ah Niantic ah camper ox Bete a Nea oa
Pe TNS
‘hia fs
; i eae i Wi ase es ee 9 hia SeRaids on /thelrzd’s Kingdom
“Then one of the
Viking warriors let
go a spear from his
hands, let it fly
from fas fist so that
if went all too
deeply into
thelred’s noble
thane.”
Anglo-Saxon
poem The Battle
of Maldon
Above: a silver pemery of
Ethelrad, king of England
from 978-1016, Ethelned
was certainly unsuited to the
role of warrior king, but his
nickname “Unread” does sot
mean “anready"—bis
Eingdom was wealtiry,
efficient and bad a
fleet. The Saxom word
“ill-advised”; Aethelred
failed to inspire cain, ce in
his subjects, provoked Danish
reprisals by a massacre, and
allowed bis‘defences to b
Denes a va we
AEthelred, the insecure Saxon ruler of England, was faced by a
series of relentless Viking attacks.
After the fall of the kingdom of York in 954, England enjoyed 26 y
freedom from Viking attacks. But instability in Scandinavia and an interr
tion of silver supplies from the Middle East prompted a new spate of
in the 980s. The raiders were numerous, well organized and—in con
the Anglo-Saxons—purposefully led. The mettle of the Anglo-Saxon kings
had declined after the death of Edgar in 975, His successor Edward, mur-
dered after an unhappy reign of three years, was replaced by his 12-year-old
brother, the unwarlike #thelred,
In 991 Olaf Tryggvason, a descendant of Harald Finehair, ravaged Kent and
Sussex and defeated the East Anglians under the Ealdorman Byhrtnoth at
Maldon, Essex. He was bought off with a massive payment of 22,000 Ibs of
silver, but two years later was back for more, in alliance with the Danish
King Svein Forkbeard, Olaf took his money and reputation to Norway,
where he established himself as king. Svein returned to Denmark and spent
E to sieve Norway from his former ally. Danish raids
on England continued unabated, however, and another Danegeld, of
24,000 Ibs, was paid in 1002. Later that year Athelraed, advised of ac
acy, ordered a massacre of Danes living in nd. Sve si :
have been among the victims: true or not, n was back campaigning in
southwest England in 1003 and in East Anglia in 1004, The following year
there was a famine in England; Svein and his army, which had to live off the
land, gave the country a brief respite, but he returned again in 1006-7 and
was bought off with 36,000 Ibs of Danegeld.
Welsh
Frincipalities
| at
g070-
Danes set up base on
fsle of Wight, raiding Sussex
and Hampshire far food
@ 1001
Danes raid South coast,
defeating Saxon armies
at Pinhoe and Dean
1000 ¢
Qanes winter in Normandy2/Viking attacks on
Southern England,
997-1007
ees “Ethelired's kingdom,
97
Danish campaigns, 997-1001:
_ WI
~~ 999-1000
~~" 1001
Svein Forkbeard, 1003-7:
—~—" «(1003
— «1004
008-7
a. Danish victory
inconclusive battle
oo
place sacked
Danish camp
North
ae lb
Engi
D 4774
Olof leaves for Norway. Svein
retums to Denmark vio
Wales ond Man:
E $ 980-90 & 999
widespread Viking raids
from Ireland and Man
lof and Svein paid 16,000 tbs F #1000
of silver int Danegold, Olof AEthelred's fleet ravages
meets Ethelred ond is baptized Man in reprisal for raids
1 Viking attacks on England, 980-94,
and Wales, 980-1000
A€thelned’s kingdom, 997
small-scale Wiking settlement eae” Athelred’s flee, 1000
Danish attacks, 960-2 x Danish victory
Olaf Tryggvason, 991 x Anglo-Saxon victory
Old hres sae a ‘a place raided, 980-990
a place attacked, 9914The Danes Conquer England
ar
Above: Odda’s Chapel tas
part of the Saxon monastery
at Deerburst, Gloucestershire.
This was the burial place of St
Alpbege, a monk martyred bry
the Danes in 1011, King
Edmund, defeated at
Ashingdon im 1016, fled to
Deerknerst, pursued bey Crt.
The two met on nearby Alney
Island in the Severn, and
agreed to divide the kingdom.
A @ (009
English fleet breaks up after
quarrels, Danes land unopposed
B # 1009
Thorkell raids Hampshire, Sussex
ond Berkshire
C @ Spring 1010
Thorkell repairs shibs before
raiding Eost Anglia and Mercia
D @ Spring 1013
Northumbrions and Five Boroughs
submit to Svein
E #1013
Winchester submits to Svein and
gives hostages
F@# lolz
Londoners repulse Svein's attecks
with support of Thorkell, but
submit later i the year
Ge 1013
West Country subvnits to Svein
H @ Christmas 10/3
#Ethelraed flees to Normandy
* Feb 1014
Svein dies
Spring 1014
After Svein's death, Atheired
retums to ravage Lindsey, forcing
Vikings te retreat to Demmark
K 1012-13
base of Thorkell’s fleet
} enl
Sometime between 1007 and 1013, the objective of Svein’s
| campaigns in England changed from extortion of Danegeld to
outright conquest.
Unlike the 9th-centur
rging royal pow
Viking invasions, this was a political venture aimed at
id prestige, not an invasion of settlers, The warriors
| who followed Svein, and after him Cnut, were professional soldiers fighting
of the Danegeld. Although many of the leaders and some hand-
arriors stayed in England after the conquest, most of the Vikings
took their earnings and went home to Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
} After Svein’s departure in 1007, Athelred ordered a shipbuilding pro-
gramme, Unfortunately his new fleet broke up in chaos in 1009 amid aceu-
sations of treason, and when an exceptionally large Viking army led by
Thorkell the Tall arrived at Sandwich later that year, there was no-one to
oppose it, The army spent three profitable years ravaging southeast
England, relatively unhindered by a defence that became more and more
disorganized, After a Danegeld of 48,000 pounds was paid in 1012, however,
Thorkell changed sides and entered thelrad’s service, for which he was
paid a further 21,000 pounds of silver in 1014.
Realizing that English morale was collapsing, Svein returned to England in
the spring of 1013. At Gainsborough he was met by representatives of the
|/Campaigns of Svein
and Thorkell, 1009-14 |
eeee= §=England. 1009
Thortell, 100%
Thorkell, 1010-11
Svein, 1013
Ta
Danish victory
Anglo-Saxon victory
Five Boroughs
place sacked
Viking camp2/Cnut’s conquest of
England, 1015-16
division of England under the
Treaty of Alney. 1016:
| = ‘Cnut's portion
[ i | Edmund's portion
Chats campaigns:
lols
spring 1016
summer 1016
autumn! O16
Danish victory
Anglo-Saxon victory
inconclusive bare
siege
county ravaged
paxxx( ( ( (
WELSH
er PRINCES
hee 101s
Cas
Bolis-l6 :
Chut winters ==)
~ G@ summer 1016
Lapham rile Dankoh ator
He (8 Get 1016
Below: the ead-alab of an early
1ith-century Viking tomb,
probably of one of Crut's
followers. It is decorated with a
“great beast” intertwined with a
serpent. Probably made in southern
England by a Scandinavian
craftsman and found in St Paul's
churchyard, London in 1851.
Northumbrians and the Five Boroughs, who recognized him as king.
When he marched south, Oxford, Winchester and Bath submitted. Only
London —assisted by Thorkell—held out, but when .thelraed fled to
Normandy after Christmas 1013, it too surrendered.
Five weeks later Svein died, Athelred returned to England and the
Viking army, now led by Svein’s inexperienced son Cnut, withdrew to
Denmark. Supported by Thorkell, who had changed sides again, and
another great warrior, Erik of Hladir, Cnut returned in 1015.
He wintered at Poole Harbour, and in spring 1016 marched
north to take control of Northumbria. In April King
Athelred died, and was succeeded by his able son Edmund
Ironside, who rallied the English to renewed resistance.
Throughout the summer and autumn, he fought Cnut
across the breadth of southern England. Finally, at
Ashingdon in Essex, Edmund was betrayed on the field of
battle by the Ealdorman of the Mercians and crushingly
defeated. Cnut pursued Edmund to Gloucestershire, where
the two agreed to share the kingdom. When Edmund died a
few weeks later, Cnut became master of the whole of
England.The Empire of Cnut
exceptionally tall
and strong, and the
handsomest af men
except for his nose,
which was thin,
high-set and rather
hooked. He had a
fair complexion and
a fine thick head of
hair His eyes were
dwtter than those of
other men, being
both more handsome
and keener-sighted,
Fle was a generous
men, @ great
marron, valiant,
victorious and the
happiest of men in
syle and grandeur.”
Kyntlinga Saga,
mid-1 Sth century
“Crud wets
Cnut ruled England firmly and effectively, but found it harder to
build a Scandinavian empire.
If Crut expected to be accepted as king when he returned to Denmark in
1014 after the death of his father Svein, he was disappointed; the Danes had
already chosen his brother Harald. Deprived of a kingdom at home, Cnut
returned to England. By the end of 1016, he had conquered the whole
country (m page 120-21). Three years later Harald died, and Cnut went to
Denmark to secure his succession. Leaving a regent to rule the country, he
returned to England, which he alway ognized as his most important pos-
session. He consolidated his hold there by granting lands and titles to his
followers, establishing a new Anglo-Danish aristocracy. Otherwise, he ruled
in the Anglo-Saxon tradition and made few changes. He taxed the English
heavily to support his housecarles (bodyguards) and to fund a standing
fleet, but his rule was not unpopular; he was remembered as a strong king
who supported the church, legislated wisely and kept the peace.
One of Gnut's chief aides was Erik, earl of Hladir, the pro-Danish ruler of
the Trondelag. His absence in England gave Olaf Haraldson, a
Norwegian of royal blood with a successful Viking career behind
him, the chance to defeat the pro-Danish forces in
Norway and make himself king in 1016, When Olaf
allied with the Swedes and invaded Skane in
1026, Cnut could no longer ignore him. In
1028 he took a fleet of 50 ships, picked
up reinforcements in Denmark, and
invaded Norway. Olaf, whose hard-
line imposition of Christianity had
made him unpopular, fled te
Sweden. Two years later he
returned, but was defeated and
killed by the Norwegians at
Stikelstad. Cnut appointed his
English concubine Aeclfgifu as
regent, but she became so unpopular
that his grip on Norway began to slip.
Cnut was arguably the greatest of the
Viking kings, but his empire fell apart as
soon as he died in 1035, His son and
chosen heir Harthacnut was accepted
as king in Denmark, but the English
chose his brother Harald, while the
Norwegians crowned Magnus the
Good, the son of Cnut’s old enemy
Olaf. When Harald died in 1039,
Harthacnut was finally able to
make good his claim to rule
England. After his death in 1042,
Aethelred’s son Edward
returned from exile in
Normandy, and the line of
Wessex was restored.
trish Sea
=ay
Kailsiin!
Trondheim — :
1028 © Storsjiin
Chat recognized king
of Norway. Olaf flees
to Sweden
Sogne ad
Piqrd 7, =
=
a
=
wae
cf oHardatiger
Sea
a0 103
Pe noneg ‘and Swedes
invade Skéine and defeat
|| Gut ot Helga (Holy River)
Hornavan
The growth of Cnut's
empire, 1015-35
lands ruled by Cnut:
C2} oc 1016
[JJ now 1018
CJ tos
CJ iors
—" Chut's journeys
—> Wendish rads, ¢. 1020-40
bareThe Thunderbolt of the North
Haratd Hardrada—the Thunderbolt of the North—journeyed from
Norway to Jerusalem before dying in an attempt to seize the
throne of England.
Harald’s career began at the age of 15, when he fought for his half-brother
King Olaf Haraldson at the battle of Stiklestad in 1030, They were defeated,
and Harald fled first to Sweden and then te Russia, where he became a mer-
cenary for Prince Jaroslav of Novgorod. Three ye
to Constantinople to join the Byzantine emperor's elite Varangian guard.
After nine years’ campaigning, Harald had won gold and fame; now he
would seck a share of Magnus the Good's Danish and Norwegian kingdom,
rs later, Harald moved on
In 1044 Harald returned to Sweden. Exploiting his wealth and reputation,
he raised an army and invaded Denmark in 146, Magnus quickly agreed to
share his kingdom, and on his death the following year, Harald became sole
Below: the Varangian guara,
the Byzantine emperor's elite
corps of Scandinavian merce-
naries, This ilustration, from
a maneeript of the Byzantine
historian Jokn Seylitses,
shows them with their Viking
axes, three-potrted banners
and kite-shaped shields,
ee i
ely
Fcc
#1068
/ at bottle of
scence:“King Harald ...
fair-haired, with a
Jair beard and long
.. He
wes brutal la his
moustaches
enemies and dealt
ruthlessly with any
opposition ... but
generous to his
friends.”
King Harald’s
Saga
ruler. But his nephew Svein Estrithson seized Denmark, and years of brutal
warfare followed, Harald repeatedly ravaged Denmark, but Svein’s dogged
resistance finally forced Harald to acknowledge him as king of Denmark in
1064, Harald also faced frequent opposition to his rule in Norway, earning
his nickname “Hardrada” (Hard Ruler) by the ruthless means he used to
defend his authority.
The death of England's King Edward the Confessor in 1066 led to Harald's
last expedition. Edward left three claimants to his throne, Harald Hardrada,
William Duke of Normandy and Harold Godwinson the Earl of Wessex. The
English chose Harold Godwinson, but both Harald and William laid plans
to invade England. Harald moved first. He entered the Humber with 300
ships, crushed the English at Fulford Gate and took York on 20 September.
Five davs later he and most of his army lay dead on the field of Stamford
Bridge: it was said that only 24 ships were needed to take the survivors
home. The victor, Harold Godwinson, marched his exhausted army south to
his own death at Hastings just 19 days later.
Hardrada, 1030-66
Harald’s journeys;
1030-35
1035-44The Struggle for England
“As a result of the
Normans
plundering
England... such a
great famine
prevailed that
mer... devoured
human flesh,
horses, dogs and
cals... Hl was
horrific to see
human corpses
rotting in the
houses and the
streets...”
Simeon of
Durham
Right: in this sceme frows the
Bayeux tapestry, William's
fleet approaches the English
coast. By 1066 the Normans
had adapted the French
language and culture, but the
design of their ships still
reflects their Scandinavian
heritage.
Wittiam of Normandy invaded England, but other Norsemen soon
arrived from Denmark and Ireland to contest his claim and assist
the English rebels.
Following his victory at Hastings, William the Conqueror quickly took con-
trol of the southeast, and it appeared as if the English would quietly accept
him as their king. Two years later, however, his grip on the country was
shaken by a series of rebellions.
After his death, Harald Hardrada’s claim to the English throne had passed
to the Danish king Svein Estrithson. It was to him that the rebels turned for
support, offering to accept him as king. In 1069, Svein sent a fleet of 240
ships to England under his son Cnut and other nobles. The fleet landed at
Dover and then sailed north, enjoying little success until it joined the rebels
on the Humber. The Anglo-Danish army marched on York and wiped out
the Norman garrison. William marched north, but failed to draw the rebels
into battle, and headed back to the Midlands to crush a rising. Around
Christmas he returned, captured York, and forced the Danes to retreat to
the Humber.
William spent the winter in his notorious “Harrying of the North”, a brutal
campaign of ravaging intended as much to make the area unattractive to
the Danes as to punish the rebels, Undeterred, Svein joined his son on the
Humber in the spring of 1070. In June, part of the Danish fleet moved
south to the Fenlands to join the English rebels under Hereward in sacking
Peterborough, But, with English resistance almost at an end, Svein reached
an agreement with William and returned home with his plunder.
Five years later, Cnut returned to England with a Danish-Norwegian fleet of
200 ships at the invitation of two rebellious Norman earls, By the time he
arrived the rebellion was over, and apart from sacking York he achieved
nothing. The last Viking threat to England came in 1085 when Cnut, now
king of Denmark, once again planned to invade. By now, though, Norman
England had proven its strength and the Danes saw no profit in their king's
ambitions, Disputes prevented the fleet from sailing, and in 1086 Cnut was
assassinated.The Vikings and the English rebellions, 1066-71
Svein Estrithson 1069-70 areas of resistance to William |068-70
—
Cut (Svein's son) 1075 ue William's campaigns 1069-70
su Harold's sons & Irish-Norse 1068 William's invasion 1066
~~
a town sacked
Harold's sons & Irish-Norse 1069
Noort ht
7) |
ho |é se
a C bra is i
Sela
English ChannelThe Kingdom of Man and the Isles
Right: 5¢ Magnus’ church on
Egilsay in Orkney is the sole
survivor of a nurtber of fine
stane churches built by the
Norse in the northern isles
after their conversion to
Christianity. The tower was
originally 12-15 ft (45m)
taller and bad a conical roof,
giving it the appearance of an
Irish monastic round tower.
As happened throughout the Viking world in the 11th century, the
Scandinavian settlers in Scotland began to develop centralized
governments.
The process began in the Earldom of Orkney during the reign of Earl
Thorfinn the Mighty (1014-64). Thorfinn was an able war leader: he defeat-
ed a Scottish attempt to recover Caithness in 1035 and added Ross, She
land, the Isle of Man and, possibly, lands in Galloway and Ireland to his
dominions, Thorfinn's victories brought him enormous prestige and,
though he acknowledged the sovereignty of the Norwegian crown, he was a
considerable ruler in his own right. Thorfinn was more than just a warrior,
however, and in his later ye
administrative i
he attempted to give his domains a unifying
structure. The first Earl of Orkney to be
brought up as a Christian, he actively promoted the conversion of the still
largely pagan Norse settlers of Orkney, founding a bishopric at his palace at
Birsay after visiting Rome in 1048.
After Thorfinn's death the Orkney earldom lost control of the Isles, In L079
Godred Crovan of Islay succeded in uniting the Hebrides and the Isle of
Man in a kingdom which he ruled until his death in 1095. Godred divided
his kingdom up into five regions, which toge | of 32 represen-
tatives to the annual assembly at Tynwald om. Thingvdlle—the meeting-
place) in the Isle of Man. The modern Manx parliament is the direct
descendant of this Viking assembly.
sent a to
The independence of the kingdom of the Isles was soon challenged by the
Norwegian monarchy. In 1095 King Magnus III “Barelegs” agreed a treaty
with Malcolm Canmore, king of Scotland, confirming Norway’s ancient
claim to the Hebrides and Kintyre. But resistance in the Kingdom of the
Isles meant that Magnus had to establish his authority by a brutal ravaging
campaign in 1098. In what was to be the last major Viking campaign in the
Irish Sea, he went on to capture Dublin and to exact plunder and tribute in
Galloway and Anglesey. Magnus’s reign brought Norwegian power in the
Isles to its peak, but his achievement had only been made possible by his
prolonged absence from Norway. Af Magnus was killed in Ireland in
1104, Godred's son Olaf revived the kingdom, though he and his successors
tactfully recognized Norwegian sovereignty.>
“yy -
0 65 kms
é aise
N _ Shetland
EARLDOM OF :
ORKNEY o® “*¥4e
(035% °
“Ea Thorfinn’s palace
as £3 a Orkaey
é
Me
SCOTLAND.
ER tam
Barelegs
establishes his
authority over
Kingdom of Man
and the Isles
North
Sea
| Viking Scotland,
1014-1104
| Earidom of Orkney:
maximum extent,
1035-79
after 1079
territory gained by
Thorfinn the Mighty
1035
of Man and the tsles:
Lewis group
Skye group
Mull group
tslay group
probable Islay group
Man
independent Gaelic-
Norse population
Magnus Barelegs, 1098 |
1093 &
te Magnus Barelegs Nl
G 7 >)" defeats two Norman earls
a lg Bublin |
a °\@ intermittently controlled
by Kingdom of Man | ©
\p @ 1070-90
1 St David's sacked!3 times
cad
‘
UTI
fourThe Twilight of Viking Scotland
“In 1156 during
the night of
Epiphany a naval
battle was fought
between Godred
and Somerled, ane
there was much
slaughter on both
sides, When
daybreak came...
they divided the
Kingdom of the
Isles between
them...”
Chronicle of the
Kings of Man
and the Isles
The Viking age died hard in the Scottish Isles, and raids continued
until the late 12th century.
The slow assimilation of the Norse settlers of the Hebrides into the native
Celtic population was nearing completion in the 12th century. A sign of this
was the rise of Somerled, a chieftain of Argyll of mixed Scottish and Norse
descent, In 1156 Somerled won control of the southern Hebrides after
defeating Godred II of Man in a sea battle fought by moonlight on a mid-
winter's night off Islay. From now on, the strongest influence in the Isles
would be Gaelic but, preferring a distant lord to a near one, Somerled and
his successors continued to acknowledge the sovereignty of the Norwegian
rather than the Scottish kings.
In an area where central authority was weak, there was still room for an old-
fashioned Viking freebooter to make a living from piracy. Perhaps the last
Viking was an Orkney Islander, § Asleifarson, who maintained a band of
some 80 followers at his hall on Gairsay. According to the Orkneyinga Saga,
Svein raided twice a year. His “spring-trip”, as he called it, started after sow-
ing had been completed on his farm and lasted until midsummer. Then,
after the harvest was safely gathered in, he set off on his “autumn-trip”
which lasted until midwinter, Svein raided the Hebrides, Wales and Ireland,
plundered English merchant ships in the Irish Sea and even sacked a
monastery in the Scilly Isles. After 30 years of piracy, he was eventually killed
on a raid on Dublin in 1171.
By the 13th century, Norse dominion was fading. The Scots had recovered
Ross, Caithness and Sutherland by1202, and harboured ambitions to seize
control of Man and the Isles, In1263 King Hakon IV of Norway led an expe-
oO dition to strengthen his authority there. His “Great Fleet”