0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views8 pages

Grid Slab 2

design of grid slab

Uploaded by

d4891
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views8 pages

Grid Slab 2

design of grid slab

Uploaded by

d4891
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
262 Advanced Reinforced Conette Design TE and (1 are the spacings ofthe ribs nx and directions respectively, ‘then we have the relations, De=(Ehbs) Co (Ci/b,) Dy=(Ehjay) — C,= (Clay) where Eh, Ela, Cy and C; ate the flexural and torsional sigidites of the ‘etive section in x andy diretions. The moments and shears are compe ted using the following expressions ales) Alete)] Masini boning moments devlpat ene of pa wil! maximum {orsional moments are. generated at tho corners of the grid and masimun shear forces develop at mid points of longer side supports, 14.3 DESIGN EXAMPLE A reinforced concrete grid floor is to be designed to cover a floor area of Size 12m by 16m. The spacings of the ribs in mutually perpendicular Girections being 2 m ec. Live load 1.5 KN/m2. Adopt M-20 gradeconerces and tor stecl, Analyse the arid flor for moments and shears using. (@ Approximate method (Rankine Grashoft theory) (@) Rigorous analysis (plate theory Design suitable reinforcements at critical sections. 1. Data Size of grid 12m by 16m Spacings of ribs= 2 m e/e Concrete=M-20 grade Steel= Ribbed tor stee! Fe-4ts 2. Dimensions of Stab and Beams Adopt thickness of slab = 100 mm Depth of ribs based on. (&e) = 20is obtained as depth 12510) aon Grid oF Coered Floors 263 Width of rib=200 mm Adopt over all depth of ribs = 600 mm Figure 14.4, shows the details of the grid and the seetion of the ribs in both directions. 7 hee 2 ft r 4 | J | i i LL | i qh ate JUILG i LILI 4 LI i | lr rr i r r | JL | i — } Cal Plan ot Gre Floor | i ten 2080 —— T Bion | | y a ; | ! | a Ly a aig el Section of ibe 49 X and ¥ Directions Fig. 144 Reinfored concrete eid Boor 264. Advanced Reinforced Conrete Desi 3. Loads Weight of slab= (0,1 24) =2.4 kNim? Total oad of sab =(2.4 16 > 12) = 460.8 KN Weight of ribs = (0.20.5 24)=2.4 kNim Total weight of beams (x-direction) =(7 «2.4 12)=201.6EN Total weight of beams (-direction)=(5 24» 14.6)=1752 kN Total weight of loor finish = (0.6. 12 16)= 115.2 kN Total five load =(1.5» 12 = 16) 288 kN oval dead and tive loads on grid oor = (460.8 4.201.6-4 175.2 4 115.24.288.0) = 1240.8 KN 1240.8 a- (5 Load per m? SkN/m? 4. Approximate Method (Moments) Igy and g2 ate the loads shared in the x and y ditections -63(rserta) Moments in x and y directions at centre of grid for 2m width is SKN/m? tind te (Ot) (222) 0 em tym (2) (S21) sore oon (222*12) coun oo (229 sea he agprovinate methods pet the wing omens ine pd 5. Rigwos Mad (Hate ary (3)-(42)-er (:)-(35)-0m Grid oF Coffered Hlaoes 265 From design table (Reynolds R.C. designers hand book) Co beD3 ‘The value of consistant C= 0.191 T= (0.191 » 200 x 6008) = 83 « 108 mat IC, and fy are the second moment of arca of the tee-sections about their centrodal axis in the x and y directions respectively, Dim Eh Drew Els In the present case /y= f= /, and a,=6,= 2m (2x2) -oonsse De=d, ‘The torsional rigidity in the x and y direotions are given by, Cy Ca= kG (20)°% where 2a=200 mm 25~ 600 mm, For in)=( 328) 03, byn0.263 (From Tales in Timoshenko theory of assy) ci=co=t [af ]08 esses focuses 488 > 108 mm* = 0.008488. mt 0,0005488 anf Jposaise (0 Doteiono Cente of Spn SKNim?, — E= S700 fer = 25.49 x 108 KN/m* 004152) _ (oan 25.49 10 = (200) | 9 108) 50 @) (2005) _(omts.2540%208). 2) Come) cages 0278 ‘The deflection at the centre of the plate is given by the equation, 266 Advanced Reinforced Concrete Deson -(85) 1 963) Zon FO37eF Assuming a creep coefficient #=2 The modified modulus of elasticity (EE Long term deflection = (0,015 » 3)= 0.045 m According to IS: 456-1978, the long term deflection should not oon) Hen maxim perisibl lone erm sion =(2,) 0.048 m > 0045 m The maximum deletion ining long erm ees is within perm eas (© Design Moments and Shears ‘The bending moments tron momen and shears t various alent pein 6H, 1K and D marked nF Tl a conped sing the equations ghen bows sen) 65) = 0.00815 «25.49 «10435 )o.018) = (sng) ae * an Bs ~oeuss 2340s i0(2}ot (ining =61 (sin 2) in me YE Grid oF Cffered oat 267 12744 25.49 x 10x? , (cos) oman 2549 125.015 208 (oor 2) --s(orz)(o2) sine EN) = 9(2) 19 = 100274284910 a7 not (cor 22) (coe) 253 (sok) (oe on after 3] eta OF 0.000744 2549 10 (tall 2(u2) = = 0.015[ 0.00415 «25.49 108 = = 10.107( cos) we) i) fog] ~-onfemnes stom: 2) + (.0002784 25.49 108 ae)] (sin) (co) = 130 sn) (co) Using these moment and shear equations, the values of bending moment, twisting moment and shear forces are computed at the ‘various salient points of the grid and tabulated as shown in Table 14.1 Poi E F « u ii Z D vanced Relaforcl Conrte Design Tass 1.1 Moments and Sear Foros Per Mee Wid of Grit im My My Me OO ™ my aN —GNm aN GN'm aN aN 5 os wm o@ 0 0 0 6 on fy 8 8 ok ete ok o 8 er er 2 8 4 ms 0 0 am $8 Boo sts ooo8 a Sn Se eo ° ° 16 oh ol ani soil) 6. Comparison of Moments ‘The moments per metre width computed by the rigorous and approxi- ‘mate methods are shown in Table 14.2 ‘Tante 14.2 Comparison of Maximum Moments in Grid Moments per metre width (kN) Method Approximate method (Rankine Grasho® theory) %0 * Rigorous analysis (place theory) 108 7 ‘The approximate method under estimates the bending moments developed in wand y-diestions, to the extent of 17% and. 38% res. peetively. The moments are very much underestimated in the long Span rection 1. Design of Reinjorcemems Maximum working moment Mfe= 108 kN my Moment resisted by central ib in x-direction over 2m width = (2% 108)= 216 kN Ultimate moment Mu (1.5 «216)=324 EN-m Moment capacity of lange setion Mar= 0.36f br Dd ~ 0.429) = (0.3620 2000 100) (550~ 0.42 100) 2731106 Nomm =731 kN Since Mu < Mar ‘Neutral axis falls within the flange 65 dwali~ $7] Grid or Cflered Floor 260 324 106 0.87 415 +d $501 Solving d= 17000? Provide 4 brs of 281mm dante (A= 1964 mn?) Main ama shar = (1.52 13.4) 402 (9) (93235) 0209 some sing wo Bs 0 be Bet wp a UPPER du at ppt 9820? 1004 Bd since %< re, provide nominal shear reinforcements, sing 6 dae meter, two leged sterups, spacing (2828415) _ 969 mm ide) ~ (Fisrem: 2° Provide 6 min diameter 2 legged stirrups at 250 mm cfe at supports nd the spacing gradually inereasd t0 40 mum towards the centre of ane. Maximum. moment ithe central rib inthe direction (long span) is, My=(QXx 771.5) = 281 KN-m Provide 4 bars of 20 mm @ (4a=1286 mn?) and 6mm @, 2 lerged Strup, at 250mm centres near the sippots. ‘The beam setion at D eGDARSs tar torsion and sutabiy reinforced The momenta in the ‘Jab being small nh reinforcement consisting of 6 mm # at 200 mm cents provided both ways for positive and negative moments in the Slab. The reinforcement details in the typical seetions of the grid is shown in Fig. 14.5 ]=089 %22057Ninme 14.4 EXAMPLES FOR PRACTICE 1. Attwo way slab Sm by Sm size with ribs at Im intervals is to be Gesigned. to support a five Toad of 4 kN/m?. Adopting M-15 grade ‘concrete and Fe-815 grade for steel, design a suitable grid floor and sketch details of reinforcements in ribs A reinforced concrete grid floor of size 9 m by 12m is required for ‘an assembly hall, Assuming rib spacing of 1.5m in the short span direction and 2m in the long span direction, design the grid floor ‘Adopt M20 grade concrete and Fe-15 grade tor steel Live load may be assumed as 4 kN/nv.

You might also like