0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views2 pages

Reading Habit Extent: Symmetric Measures

The document reports the results of statistical analyses examining the relationships between various reading habits, preferences, and interests. It finds: 1) A moderate positive correlation between reading habit and reading extent. 2) No correlation between media preference and reading extent. 3) Strong positive correlations between readability, content, layout, reading habit, and reading interest. 4) A weak positive correlation between media preference and reading interest.

Uploaded by

Marcel Velasco
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views2 pages

Reading Habit Extent: Symmetric Measures

The document reports the results of statistical analyses examining the relationships between various reading habits, preferences, and interests. It finds: 1) A moderate positive correlation between reading habit and reading extent. 2) No correlation between media preference and reading extent. 3) Strong positive correlations between readability, content, layout, reading habit, and reading interest. 4) A weak positive correlation between media preference and reading interest.

Uploaded by

Marcel Velasco
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Reading Habit*Extent

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman’s Rho .343 .046 7.274 .000
N of Valid Cases 400
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Media Preference*Extent

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman’s Rho .023 .047 .457 .648
N of Valid Cases 400
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Readability*Reading Interest

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman’s Rho .483 .043 11.012 .000
N of Valid Cases 400
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Content*Reading Interest

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman’s Rho .574 .037 13.996 .000
N of Valid Cases 400
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
Layout*Reading Interest

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman’s Rho .482 .040 10.982 .000
N of Valid Cases 400
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Reading Habit*Reading Interest

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman’s Rho .434 .042 9.598 .000
N of Valid Cases 400
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Media Preference*Reading Interest

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
Value Standard Errora Approximate Tb Significance
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman’s Rho .121 .048 2.422 .016
N of Valid Cases 400
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

You might also like