Integral Transforms
Integral Transforms
Andrews, Larry C.
Integral transforms for engineers / Larry C. Andrews, Bhimsen K. Shivamoggi
p. cm.
Originally published: New York: Macmillan, c1988.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8194-3232-6
1. Shivamoggi, Bhimsen K. II. Title.
QA432.A63 1999
515'.723—dc21 99-14143
CIP
Published by
Larry C. Andrews
Bhimsen K. Shivamoggi
Orlando, Florida
March, 1999
VII
such that a given function f(t) is transformed into another function F(s)
by means of an integral. The new function F(s) is said to be the transform
of f(t), and K(s,t) is called the kernel of the transformation. Both
K(s, t) and f(t) must satisfy certain conditions to ensure existence of the
integral and a unique transform function F(s). Also, generally speaking,
not more than one function f(t) should yield the same transform F(s).
When both of the limits of integration in the defining integral are finite,
we have what is called a finite transform.
Within the above guidelines there are a variety of kernels that may
be used to define particular integral transforms for a wide class of functions
f(t). If the kernel is defined by
which, when t is restricted to the positive real line, leads to the Fourier
sine and Fourier cosine transforms
We will always interpret integrals like (0.1) as the principal value of the integral,
Jim
defined in general by PV j x f(x)dx = jN f(x)dx.
R . - N
t Other definitions of K(s,t) for Fourier transforms involve the choices e", e",
(l/2ir)e", among others.
and
^2 ƒ o ƒ(t)cos st dt = F(s)
— (0.7)
The Laplace and Fourier transforms are by far the most prominent
in applications. Many other transforms have been developed, but most
have limited applicability. In addition to the Laplace and Fourier transforms,
the next most useful transforms are perhaps the Hankel transform of
order v
where J„(x) is the Bessel function of the first kind (see Sec. 1.4), and
the Mellin transform
which is very much like the transform itself in Eq. (0.5). This means
that the problems of evaluating transforms or inverse transforms are
essentially the same for Fourier transforms. This is not necessarily the
case for other transforms like the Laplace transform, however, where
the inversion formula is quite distinct from that of the transform integral.
Also, in the case of finite transforms, the inverse transform is in the
form of an infinite series.
The basic aim of the transform method is to transform a given problem
into one that is easier to solve. In the case of an ordinary differential
equation with constant coefficients, the transformed problem is algebraic.
The effect of applying an integral transform to a partial differential equation
is to reduce it to a partial differential equation in one less variable. The
solution of the transformed problem in either case will be a function of
the transformed variable and any remaining independent variables. In-
version of this solution produces the solution of the original problem.
The exponential Fourier transform does not incorporate any boundary
conditions in transforming the derivatives. Thus, it is best suited for
solving differential equations on infinite domains where the boundary
conditions usually only require bounded solutions. On the other hand,
the Fourier cosine and sine transforms are well suited for solving certain
problems on semiinfinite domains where the governing differential equation
involves only even-order derivatives. We will see that the Fourier transform
lends itself nicely to solving boundary-value problems associated with
the following partial differential equations:
(a)the heat equation:
V 2 u = a -2 U t — q(x,y,z,t) (0.12)
(b)the wave equation:
V 2 u = c -Zu rr — q(x,y,z,t) (0.13)
(c) the potential equation:
V2u = 0 (0.14)
In addition, it is useful in the solution of linear integral equations of the
form
(0.17)
ƒo u(T)k(t — r) dr f(t),
t
t> 0