0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views

Factoriales

The document discusses simplifying ratios involving factorials as n approaches infinity. It shows that: 1) The ratio of (n+1)! over (n-1)! approaches infinity as n increases without bound. 2) The ratio of (n+1)! over (2n-1)! approaches 0 as n increases without bound. 3) The ratio of (3n)! over the product of (2n)! and n! approaches infinity as n increases without bound. 4) The ratio of (4n)! over the square of (2n)! approaches infinity as n increases without bound.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views

Factoriales

The document discusses simplifying ratios involving factorials as n approaches infinity. It shows that: 1) The ratio of (n+1)! over (n-1)! approaches infinity as n increases without bound. 2) The ratio of (n+1)! over (2n-1)! approaches 0 as n increases without bound. 3) The ratio of (3n)! over the product of (2n)! and n! approaches infinity as n increases without bound. 4) The ratio of (4n)! over the square of (2n)! approaches infinity as n increases without bound.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Sample Simplifications and Limits for Factorial Expressions.

Exercises.
Simplify the ratios in #1-4 below:
(n + 1)! (n + 1)n(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)
1. = = (n + 1)n
(n − 1)! (n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)
2.
(n + 1)! (n + 1)n(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)
= =
(2n − 1)! (2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)
1
(2n-1)(2n-2) ... (n+2)
3.
(3n)! (3n)(3n − 1)(3n − 2) ... (2n+1)(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n-1) ... (3)(2)(1)
=
(2n)!n! [(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)][(n)(n-1) ... (3)(2)(1)]
(3n)(3n − 1)(3n − 2) ... (2n+1) 3 (3n − 1) (3n − 2) (2n + 3) (2n + 2) (2n + 1)
= = ...
[(n)(n-1) ... (3)(2)(1)] 1 (n-1) (n − 2) 3 2 1

4.
(4n)! ( 4 n )( 4 n − 1) ... ( 3n + 1)( 3n )( 3n − 1)( 3n − 2 ) ... (2n+1)(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n-1) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)
2
=
[(2n)!] [(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2 ) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)][(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2 ) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)]

( 4 n )( 4 n − 1) ... ( 3n + 1)( 3n )( 3n − 1)( 3n − 2 ) ... (2n+1) 4 ( 4 n − 1) ( 3 n + 1) ( 3 n ) ( 2 n + 3 ) ( 2 n + 2 ) ( 2 n + 1)


= = ... ...
[(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2 ) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)] 2 (2n-1) ( n + 1) (n) 3 2 1

n → ∞.
5. For each of the above four ratios, determine the limit, as
(n + 1)! (n + 1)n(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)
lim = lim = lim (n + 1)n = ∞
n→∞ (n − 1)! n→∞ (n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1) n→∞
(n + 1)! (n + 1)n(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)
lim = lim =
n→∞ (2n − 1)! n→∞ (2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)

1
lim =0
n→∞ (2n-1)(2n-2) ... (n+2)

(3n)! (3n)(3n − 1)(3n − 2) ... (2n+1)(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n-1) ... (3)(2)(1)


lim = lim
n→∞ (2n)!n! n→∞ [(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2) ... (3)(2)(1)][(n)(n-1) ... (3)(2)(1)]

(3n)(3n − 1)(3n − 2) ... (2n+1)


= lim =
n→∞ [(n)(n-1) ... (3)(2)(1)]
3 (3n − 1) (3n − 2) (2n + 3) (2n + 2) (2n + 1)
lim ... =∞
n→∞ 1 (n-1) (n − 2) 3 2 1
since each of the factors is greater than 1 and the factor 2n+1 is larger than n. It
should be noted that there are exactly the same number of factors, namely n,
between 2n+1 and 3n as there are between 1 and n, so that the factors in the
numerator match those in the denominator as indicated.

(4n)! ( 4 n )( 4 n − 1) ... ( 3n + 1)( 3n )( 3n − 1)( 3n − 2 ) ... (2n+1)(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n-1) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)
lim 2
= lim
n→∞ [(2n)!] n→∞
[(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2 ) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)][(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2 ) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)]

( 4 n )( 4 n − 1) ... ( 3n + 1)( 3n )( 3n − 1)( 3n − 2 ) ... (2n+1)


= lim =
n→∞
[(2n)(2n-1) ... (n+1)(n)(n − 1)(n − 2 ) ... ( 3)(2 )(1)]

4 ( 4 n − 1) ( 3 n + 1) ( 3 n ) ( 2 n + 3 ) ( 2 n + 2 ) ( 2 n + 1)
lim ... ... =∞
n→∞
2 (2n-1) ( n + 1) (n) 3 2 1

by the same reasoning as in the previous problem.

You might also like