NMR Lecture
NMR Lecture
Applications
Drug design
MRI
Food quality
Spectroscopic technique, thus relies on the interaction between material and electromagnetic radiation
The nuclei of all atoms possess a nuclear quantum number, I. (I0, always multiples of .)
Only nuclei with spin number (I) >0 can absorb/emit electromagnetic radiation.
Even atomic mass & odd number: I = whole integer (14N, 2H, 10B)
The spinning nuclei possess angular momentum, P, and charge, and so an associated magnetic moment, .
= x P
I, (I - 1), (I - 2), … , -I
I= (e.g. 1H)
–
Energy
– E=h=hB0/2
B0=0 B0>0
NMR Spectroscopy
Basic Principles
E=h0=hB0/2
Bo>0
0 is the Larmor Frequency
0=B0, angular velocity
Bo=0
B0 z
y
x
NMR Spectroscopy
Basic Principles
Each level has a different population (N), and the difference between the two is related
to the energy difference by the Boltzmman distribution:
N/N = eE/kT
N/N =1.000064
The surplus population is small (especially when compared to UV or IR).
1022 600
-rays 500 10 aldehydic
1020 Mossbauer 1H
400 8
19F aromatic
X-rays
1018 300 6
olefinic
4
ultraviolet 1016 electronic 200 acetylenic
31P 2
visible 1014 aliphatic
0
infrared vibrational
1012 13C /ppm
100
microwave
1010 rotational
/MHz
108 NMR
radiofrequency
106
/Hz
NMR Spectroscopy
The Vector Model
M0
y y
x x
y y
x x
NMR Spectroscopy
NMR excitation
z
Mo B1 = C * cos (ot)
y
B1
x
Bo i
Transmitter coil (x)
y y
+0 -0
x x
NMR Spectroscopy
Laboratory vs. Rotating frame
z z’
+0
M0 M0
y y’
B1
+0
x x’
-0 -20
z z
=1tp (degrees)
M0
=90°
y y
B1 B1
x x =180°
NMR Spectroscopy
Magnetization properties
1H=400,000,000 Hz
A=400,000,005 Hz
z
MAy
y y y
B1 MAx
x =5 Hz
x x
y y y
x x x
NMR Spectroscopy
Magnetization properties
1H=400,000,000 Hz
A=400,000,005 Hz
z
MAy
y y y
B1 MAx
x =5 Hz detector
x x
t
t t
NMR Spectroscopy
The Fourier Transform
FT
time domain frequency domain
=1/t
IM
t
FT
t
frequency
time
NMR Spectroscopy
The Fourier Transform
IM
Signal Induction Decay (FID)
time
NMR Spectroscopy
The Fourier Transform
FT
NMR Spectroscopy
Continuous wave vs. pulsed NMR
o or Bo
o or Bo
time
NMR Spectroscopy
Continuous wave vs. pulsed NMR
• For cos(t)
FT
absorptive lines
• For sin(t)
* =
tp
FT
o
NMR Spectroscopy
Continuous wave vs. pulsed NMR
E t ~ h or t ~1
NMR Spectroscopy
Single-channel signal detection
FT
y
x +
0
+ -
NMR Spectroscopy
Quadrature detection
My Mx
y
x +
My Mx
NMR Spectroscopy
Quadrature detection
cos
y
sin
x +
0
+ - Hz
+ Hz
0
NMR Spectroscopy
The Chemical Shift
The exact value of depends, however, on the position of the nucleus in the molecule or
more precisely on the local electron distribution
E=h=hB/2
Nuclei, however, in molecules are never isolated from other particles that are charged
and are in motion (electrons!).
Thus, the field actually felt by a nucleus is slightly different from that of the applied
external magnetic field!!
NMR Spectroscopy
The Chemical Shift
E=h=hBe/2
B0(1-)
=
2
(-ref)
and is the chemical shift = 106 106 (ref-)
ref
NMR Spectroscopy
The Chemical Shift
methyl
protons
methylene
amide protons protons protons
aromatic ring
shielding
frequency
magnetic field
NMR Spectroscopy
The Chemical Shift
NMR Spectroscopy
The Chemical Shift
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Shielding
diamagnetic contribution
paramagnetic contribution
ring-current effect
solvent effect
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Shielding - diamagnetic contribution
The external field B0 causes the electrons to circulate within their orbitals
B0
hB0 hB0(1-)
B’
The higher is the electron density close to the nucleus, the larger the protection is!
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Shielding - diamagnetic contribution
CH3X
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Shielding - paramagnetic contribution
The external field B0 mixes the wavefunction of the ground state with that of the excited state
The induced current generates a magnetic field that enhances the external field and deshields the
nucleus
LUMO
B0
HOMO
1 1
p = R3
NMR Spectroscopy
Chemical shift range
Local diamagnetic and paramagnetic currents make only modest contributions to 1H shielding!
NMR Spectroscopy
Chemical Shift Anisotropy
The distribution of the electrons about the nucleus is non-sperical- thus, the magnitude of the
shielding depends on the relative orientation of the nucleus with respect to the static field.
B0
B
A
A
B
- +
+ + - -
- +
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Shielding - neighboring group
+
- C C - μpar > μper
+
-
+ C C + μpar < μper
-
C 2H 4 C 2H 2 C 2H 6
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
ppm
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Shielding - ring-current effect
Bo 9.28
e-
-2.99
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Shielding - hydrogen bonding
Hydrogen bonding causes deshielding due to electron density decrease at the proton site
[EtOH] in CCl4
OH CH2 CH3
1M
0.1M
0.01M
0.001M
6 4 2 0 ppm
NMR Spectroscopy
Spin-spin (scalar) coupling
HF (1H-19F)
H F
JHF JHF
NMR Spectroscopy
Spin-spin (scalar) coupling
HF (1H-19F)
H F
H
H F
19F 1H
Bo
H F
H
H F
19F 1H
Nuclear moment
Magnetic polarization
of the electron
E=h JAX mA mX
AX2
AMX
AX3
NMR Spectroscopy
Spin-spin (scalar) coupling
The principal source of scalar coupling is an indirect interaction mediated by electrons involved in chemical bonding
The magnitude of interaction is proportional to the probability of finding the electron at the nucleus (R=0)
3J = A + B cos + C cos2
NMR Spectroscopy
Chemical shifts on the rotating frame
500 MHz
z
y 3 2
0
x
t z
=500 Hz
x
NMR Spectroscopy
Spin couplings on the rotating frame
J
z
y
0
x
t z
=-J/2 Hz
y
=+J/2 Hz
x
NMR Spectroscopy
The basic spin-echo pulse sequence
180° applied
90° applied along y axis
along x axis
x y
acquisition
delay
NMR Spectroscopy 90° applied
along x axis
180° applied
along y axis
x y
delay
z
z
90x
y y
x x
z
z
y
z
180y
A
y
A x
y
x
x
NMR Spectroscopy 90° applied
along x axis
180° applied
along y axis
x y
delay
z
z
90x 1H-X
y y
x x
z
z -J/2
y
1H)
z (only
180y +J/2
y
+J/2 x
y
x
-J/2
x
NMR Spectroscopy 90° applied
along x axis
180° applied
along y axis
x y
delay
z
z
90x 1H-X
y y
x x
z
z -J/2
y
z (both 1H and X)
180y +J/2
y
-J/2 x
y
x
+J/2
x
NMR Spectroscopy
Water suppression by the Jump and Return method
z
z
90x
y y
x x
z
z
y
z
A
y
90-x x
y
x
x
NMR Spectroscopy
Water suppression
NMR Spectroscopy
Spin decoupling
1H decouple
13C
H C
H
H C
H C
H
H C
NMR Spectroscopy
The J-modulated spin echo
1H decouple
x y
13C
NMR Spectroscopy 1H decouple
x y
The J-modulated spin echo
13C
NMR Spectroscopy 1H decouple
x y
The J-modulated spin echo
13C
If =180J degrees
C: I=1
CH:
I cos
CH2:
I cos2
CH3:
I cos3
NMR Spectroscopy 1H decouple
x y
The J-modulated spin echo
13C
=1/J
13C (ppm)
NMR Spectroscopy
Sensitivity enhancement
high rate of precession which induces a greater signal in the detection coil
}
So, the strength of NMR signal is proportional to 3
S/N 5/2
H1
C1
NMR Spectroscopy
Sensitivity enhancement by polarization transfer
C
C
2+2C
2C
C2
C2 2
2 H2
+C
H2 +C
H1
H1 2
2 C
C (inverted) C1
C1 2+2C
2C
+C
+C
C1 C2
H1 H2
H1 H2
C1 C2
-3:5
NMR Spectroscopy
Sensitivity enhancement by polarization transfer
When perturbed, the nuclear spins need to relax to return to their equilibrium distribution
E.g. when the sample is put into a magnet, the Boltzmann distribution of spins among the energy
levels changes due to a change in the energy of the various levels
E.g. after applying electromagnetic radiation, which induces transitions between energy levels,
the system returns to its equilibrium
z z z
y y y
x x x
z z
x x
NMR Spectroscopy
Longitudinal Relaxation: Establishing Equilibrium
dMz (M0-Mz)
= Mz=M0 (1-2e-t/T1)
dt T1
z z z z
180x 90x
y y y y
x x x x
z z
90x
y y
x x
NMR Spectroscopy
Longitudinal Relaxation: Measurement
x x
NMR Spectroscopy
Longitudinal Relaxation: Exponential growth
Mz=M0 (1-2e-t/T1)
- - -
y y y y
+ + +
x x x x
time
NMR Spectroscopy
Transverse Relaxation: magnetization loss in the x-y plane
1
=
T2*
NMR Spectroscopy
Transverse Relaxation: Measurement
x y
z z z
90x -
y y y
+ z
x x x
180y
+
z y
-
x
y
x
NMR Spectroscopy
Transverse Relaxation: Measurement
NMR Spectroscopy
T1 vs T2 Relaxation
T1 T2
Dipole-dipole
Longitudinal relaxation requires a time-dependent magnetic field fluctuating at the Larmor frequency
The time-dependence originates in the motions of the molecule (vibration, rotation, diffusion etc)
Molecules in solution “tumble”. This “tumbling” can be characterized by a rotational correlation time c
The probability function of finding motions at a given angular frequency can be described by the
spectral density function J()
NMR Spectroscopy
Spectral density function
So, the relaxation rate (R1) will be proportional to the J(0) 1/T1= R1 = 2 <B2> J(0)
Knowing the form of J() we can predict the dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1=1/
R1) on the correlation time c for a given NMR frequency 0
0c<<1 0c>>1
0c<<1 (small molecules), J(0) ~ 2c and T1
decreases (R1 increases) with increasing c
(e.g.by decreasing the temperature)
0c=1
0c>>1 (large molecules), J(0) ~ 2/02c
and T1 increases (R1 decreases) with
increasing c (e.g. by decreasing the
temperature)
NMR Spectroscopy
Relaxation mechanisms: Dipole-dipole
Nuclei with non-zero quantum numbers have magnetic dipoles
They behave like small magnets and induce small magnetic fields that affect neighboring nuclei
Bμz Bμx
In a crystal with fixed distances and angles the dipolar splitting vary with the crystal
orientation with respect to the external magnetic field
NMR Spectroscopy
Relaxation mechanisms: Dipole-dipole
Molecules in liquids rotate, “tumble” rapidly with typical frequencies between 1012 to
108 Hz for small molecules and proteins, respectively.
Those frequencies are much larger than typical dipolar couplings (105 Hz)
The angular part of the dipolar splitting is averaged over all possible orientation to 0
Although they are not directly observed in solution, dipolar couplings play an important
role in spin relaxation
The local field experienced at one nucleus as a result of its neighbor will fluctuate as the
molecule tumbles
NMR Spectroscopy
Relaxation mechanisms: Dipole-dipole
R1 depend of the gyromagnetic ratio of the nuclei (e.g. H-H relaxation more efficient than C-H)
NMR Spectroscopy
Relaxation mechanisms: Chemical shift anisotropy
The distribution of the electrons about the nucleus is non-sperical- thus, the magnitude of the
shielding depends on the relative orientation of the nucleus with respect to the static field.
NOE: change in intensity of one resonance when the spin transitions of another are perturbed
from their equilibrium populations
N-/2
N-
S
S I I
0
N N N/2 N+/2
0
I I S
S
N+ N+/2
S I S I
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE)
W1S W1I
W2
W0
W1I W1S
N- N-/2
S
S I I
0
N N N/2 N+/2
0
I S I S
N+ N+/2
S I S I
S I S I
0 > 0 <
W0
W2
> 0 < 0
I S I S
negative NOE
positive NOE
S I S I
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE)
Saturating for a period of time that is long relative to the relaxation times allows a new
steady-state of populations to arise
IS, dipolar longitudinal relaxation rate of spin I: it serves to reduce the magnitude
1H at 400 MHz
W1 at 400 MHz
W2 at 800 MHz (WI+WS)- stimulated by rapidly tumbling molecules
W0 at Hz-kHZ (|WI-WS|)- stimulated by slowly tumbling molecules
c=1.12
Bg
+!Bg -!Bg
-!Bg +!B
g
defocused refocused
(dephased) (rephased)
NMR Spectroscopy
Field gradient
RF
Gz
stronger gradient
NMR Spectroscopy
Field gradient
RF
Gz
Bg
!! !!
x x
"! "!
!!
#! #!
G gradient strength
D diffusion coefficient
NMR Spectroscopy
Diffusion-ordered spectroscopy
mobility
NMR Spectroscopy
Multi-dimensional NMR
One dimension
Two dimensions
NMR Spectroscopy
Multi-dimensional NMR
To generate a spectrum with two frequency domains, f1 and f2, it is necessary to sample
data as a function of two separate time variables, t1 and t2.
D
P: Preparation
E: Evolution
M: Mixing P E M
D: Detection
t1 t2
NMR Spectroscopy
Multi-dimensional NMR
hv
A B
NMR Spectroscopy
Multi-dimensional NMR
NMR Spectroscopy
COSY (COrrelated SpectroscopY)
Correlation through bonds (J-coupling)
NMR Spectroscopy
TOCSY (Total COrrelated SpectroscopY)
Correlation through bonds (J-coupling)
x !m
t2
t1
spin-lock
JAB
A B C D E
JBC
A B C D E
!m JCD
A B C D E
JDE
A B C D E
NMR Spectroscopy
COSY vs. TOCSY
Correlation through bonds (J-coupling)
COSY
TOCSY
NMR Spectroscopy
COSY vs. TOCSY
Correlation through bonds (J-coupling)
NMR Spectroscopy
General schemes for 2D NMR
Relative sensitivity
P E M D 1H-31P 1H-13C 1H-15N
a) H
1 1 1
t1
t2
X
b) H 2.5 4 10
t1
t2 (traditional)
X
c) H
4 8 30
t1
t2
X
d) H
10 32 300
t1 t2
X (inverse)
modern
NMR Spectroscopy
Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence (HSQC)
13C
1H
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
2D NOESY
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
2D NOESY
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Isotopically labeled proteins
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
1H-15N HSQC (protein’s fingerprint)
15N
1H
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Signal overlap problem alleviated by 3D & 4D NMR
110 ppm
120 ppm
130 ppm
1H 1H 1H
6.5 ppm 6.5 ppm 6.5 ppm
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Signal overlap problem alleviated by 3D & 4D NMR
2D
110 ppm
3D
120 ppm
130 ppm
1H 1H 1H
6.5 ppm 6.5 ppm 6.5 ppm
F2 (15N)
F3 (NH)
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Signal overlap problem alleviated by 3D & 4D NMR
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Signal overlap problem alleviated by 3D & 4D NMR
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Assignment - Triple Resonance Experiments
H C H
N C C
H H O
3D HNCA
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Assignment - Triple Resonance Experiments
NMR Spectroscopy
Protein NMR
Assignment - Triple Resonance Experiments
45
13C ppm
50
55
130 ppm 130 ppm 40 125 ppm 125 ppm 40 125 ppm 125 ppm 40
45 45 45
50 50 50
55 55 55
i-1 i i+1