Understanding Middle School Math
Understanding Middle School Math
Middle School 54
45
63
36
6
118
Math 71
14
17
41
35
27
72
66
181
12 53
22
21 50 34 46 8
5 43
64
25 52 33
92 29 38 83 18 74
76 81
85 73 65
67 56
Cool Problems 149 89 58 61
77 145 37 59
to Get Students 98 106
194 42 16 95
Thinking and 154 20 4
40
Connecting 24 2
224 62 26
11
15
Arthur Hyde 51
Middle School
Math
Math
54 6
45 36 118
14 41 181
27 66
71 17 35 72
12 53
22
Cool Problems 21
5
50 34
43
46 8
64
25
to Get Students 52 33 57
75
92 29 38 83 18 74
Thinking and 76 81 47
85 73 65
Connecting 67 56
149 89 58 61
77 145 37 59
98 106
194 42 16 95
154 20 4
40
24 2
224 62 26
11
15 51
Arthur Hyde
with Susan Friedlander, Cheryl Heck, and Lynn Pittner
Foreword by Judith Zawojewski
HEINEMANN
Portsmouth, NH
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by
The author and publisher wish to thank those who have generously given permis
“A weighty matter” by Lauren Cabell and Phil Geib from Chicago Tribune, 2/1/2002.
ISBN-13: 978-0-325-01386-2
ISBN-10: 0-325-01386-1
Foreword ix
INTrOduCTION 1
Extensions 16
Frameworks 20
Lives 34
Increasing Abstraction 43
Multiple Contexts 51
Red Dots 74
Algebra Tiles 76
Partial Quotients 80
Andy’s Inheritance 83
Shampoo Bottle 95
Making Seismometers 99
Transformations 99
Conclusion 181
Conclusion 219
Appendix 249
References 253
Index 259
—Judith S. Zawojewski
Department of Mathematics
and Science Education
Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago
As I think back on the way I first imagined this book about six years ago, I
really have to laugh. What was I thinking? I don’t consider myself a com
pulsive person, though I suspect others might. I see myself as thorough,
comprehensive.
My vision of Understanding Middle School Math was to empty my
filing cabinets and share the unusual manipulatives, activities, and prob
lems I have created over the nearly forty years I have been teaching math
ematics. I had indexed and coded my files (the Hyde Decimal System)
to make them easily accessible for teaching. When I began to plan this
book, I just kept adding more and more until I finally realized that sub
consciously I was trying to build my own middle school mathematics
curriculum, complete with relational database for more than five hundred
problems and their concepts.
I went back to the drawing board. I decided that a book for middle
school math teachers should have the insights of current, experienced
middle school math teachers who had taken my ideas and run with them.
I asked three excellent teachers, all of whom have taken multiple courses
with me and have incorporated many of my problems into their reper
toire, to create this resource with me.
Susan Friedlander, Cheryl Heck, and Lynn Pittner are with the same
students day after day, and their planning and teaching must reflect the
continuity of experiences they want their students to have. In contrast, I
am all over the Illinois map doing my own idiosyncratic version of lesson
study. I pose problems and activities in dozens of very different schools
and at many different grade levels, constantly tinkering with the activities
and trying to get more from students. More what? More excitement, more
engagement, more buy-in, more awareness of their own thinking, and
ultimately more understanding of mathematical concepts.
The four of us decided to select problems and activities that could
readily replace bland traditional textbook content. Susan, Cheryl, and
Lynn added richness to the problems by sharing the work of their stu
dents. We wrote many of the classroom descriptions collaboratively, some 1
A Checkerboard of Squares
How many squares are on a standard 8-by-8 checkerboard?
FIgurE I-1
77by
by77
7 by 7
FIgurE I-2
FIgurE I-3
1*1 64 82
2*2 49 72
3*3 36 62
4*4 25 52
5*5 16 42
6*6 9 32
7*7 4 22
8*8 1 12
FIgurE I-4
Let’s be candid. By the time they get to middle school, the majority of the
students in your classrooms dislike math. They really hate story problems.
They’d rather grab any two numbers they see tucked away somewhere in
the problem and just guess which operation to perform (appendectomy,
tonsillectomy, lobotomy?) than read the problem. “Wait. Do ya mean I
gotta like actually read all those words? Last year Mrs. Jones didn’t make
us read. She said we could just look for the key word that would tell us
which thing to do. Ya know, like if it had altogether, you’re supposed to
add up all the numbers. Or if it says product somewhere, you times the
two numbers.”
Misconception
many students and teachers still adhere to the myth about the
value of key words or cue words, which is a tragic mistake. Ex-
perts (Harvey and goudvis 2007, keene and Zimmermann 2007)
in reading comprehension—the in-depth understanding of mean-
ing in the written word—agree that while context cues can help
build meaning of a passage, they are no substitute for reading the
full text and using powerful reading comprehension strategies
such as:
• making connections • asking questions
• visualizing • inferring and predicting
• determining importance • synthesizing
• metacognitive monitoring
Are the two ranches the same size or is one bigger than the
other?
There are two ranchers who think they have big ranches.
They both think they have the biggest ranch in the county.
around it.
The Wright Triangle ranch is in the shape of a triangle with sides
12, 16, and 20 miles long.
The Triangle T ranch is also in the shape of a triangle with sides
10, 17, and 21 miles long.
Next, we ask the students to think through the W in the KWC, What
do we want to find out? A student may ask, for example, “Are the two
ranches the same size or is one bigger than the other?” We also keep track
of students’ responses on the board.
Last, we address the C in the KWC, Are there any special conditions,
anything strange that we need to take into consideration? Students’ ob
servations may include:
• It sounds like the two ranches have the same perimeter.
• Does that mean they are the same size?
• What does the problem mean when it says size?
We find that the C questions often provoke students to make pow
erful connections. In the example above, one student inferred that the
ranchers were talking about perimeter, although she did not literally use
that term. The distinction between literal meaning and inferential mean
ing is important in reading for understanding and is worth clarifying for
the students. We usually ask students, “Does it actually say perimeter? Is
that literally the exact word used in the problem?” When they say no, we
ask, “What did the problem say that led you to infer that perimeter was
involved?” We explain to students that it is fine to make inferences, but
in mathematics it is important when making an inference to check to be
certain that the inference is accurate.
Returning to the ranch problem, we can see that it literally says that
48 miles of barbed wire surrounds each ranch. Since perimeter is a dis
tance around an object, the inference seems justified.
Please try drawing a picture of the two ranches. It does not have
to be to scale. drawing a free-hand picture to help you see what
is going on or to help you imagine the situation is very different
from making a scale drawing, where you need to be precise in
your visual representation.
21
20
12
16
FIgurE 1.1
formula for one triangle but not the other, and we usually hear that they
“know the height of one but not the other.” We then feign ignorance and
ask students how they know the height, and they respond, “because it is
a right triangle.” Then we ask, “but how you do know that?”
As we mentioned earlier, we want students to check their inferences.
The Pythagorean Theorem tells us that in any right triangle, the sum of
the squares of the two short sides equals the square of the long side (the
hypotenuse). However, that presupposes that one knows the triangle has
a right angle. We have found it necessary on numerous occasions to re
mind students that the converse of the theorem can help us here: If the
sum of the squares of the two short sides equals the square of the long side
(the hypotenuse), then it must be a right triangle. In this case, does 122 +
162 = 202? Yes, 144 + 256 = 400. Therefore, the shape is a right triangle
with a height of 12 and a base of 16. Its area is then A = ½(12)(16), or
96 square miles.
When we ask students what can we say about the other triangle
(ranch), they are unsure how to proceed. We ask more questions:
• Let’s go back to the W. What are you trying to figure out?
• Basically, do the triangles have the same area or is one bigger than the
other?
• What would have to be true for them to be equal?
17
10
FIgurE 1.2
17
10
h
21-x x
21
FIgurE 1.3
17
10
h
x 21-x
21
FIgurE 1.4
Why?
• So I can calculate its area and compare it to the other triangle.
Are there any special conditions? Any things to watch out for?
• That 21 – x looks like trouble.
Ideally, next we would ask students to work on the problem indi
vidually or in small groups, and then in the debriefing we would explore
different ways they solved the problem (see below) with the intention of
helping them experience the necessary logical reasoning. Note that this
debriefing is not a lecture—we take what students have done and model
for them how to think about each step in the process.
Art: Sally, tell us what you did first. And how do you know it’s okay to
do that?
Sally: I wrote h2 + x2 = 102 = 100. I knew I could do this because I can
use the Pythagorean Theorem with the right triangles.
Art: Okay, this tells us a basic relationship between h and x. What’s
next?
Billy: I just did the same thing with the other right triangle:
h2 + (21 – x)2 = 172 = 289.
Art: What would we do next?
Billy: Let’s try clearing out the parentheses and combining the things
that go together:
h2 + 441 – 42x + x2 = 289.
Art: Yes, this looks kind of yucky—but what do you see that’s like what
happened when we used Pythagoras with the other triangle? Both
have h2 and x2, so we can do some substitution:
h2 + x2 = 42x – 152 and h2 + x2 = 100
100 = 42x – 152 42x = 252 x = 6 21 – x = 15
h2 + x2 = 100 h2 + 62 = 100 h2 + 36 = 100 h2 = 64 h=8
Determining the height and area of the scalene triangle is good for
students to work on because it reveals how beautifully substitution of
equivalent quantities can quickly simplify a system of equations. What at
first looked like messy quadratics became quite manageable—the height of
the triangle is 8 and its base is 21, therefore A = 1/2bh or A = 1/2(21)(8) = 84
square miles, making it definitely smaller than the 12, 16, 20 right triangle
(area = 96 square miles), despite identical perimeters of 48 miles.
We like the ranch problem because, by using KWC, prior knowl
edge, inference, language, and scaffolding, teachers can help students see
connections that deepen their understanding of geometric concepts and
of algebraic equations representing geometric relationships (formulas).
Teachers can differentiate the ranch problem easily by:
1. backtracking to make connections for those students whose
knowledge is not well developed; for example, partitioning and
part-whole relations in concrete form and expressed algebraically;
2. creating more examples at the same level of difficulty; for exam
ple, there are many scalene triangles like 10, 17, 21, composed
of two Pythagorean triangles, where students would have to find
the heights (altitudes); and
3. challenging those few students who can profit from going way
beyond; for example, saying,
A = ¼ √(a+b+c)(a+b–c)(a–b+c)(b–a+c)
This is a version of Heron’s formula. Can you see the triangle sum
theorem hidden within this equation? Look at the four expressions
under the square root sign. The first (a + b + c) is the perimeter.
The other three expressions check to see if the sum of two sides is
greater than the third side. If not, it is not a triangle.
Extensions
The following modification can be made for early middle school students
who are learning about perimeter and area, but have not yet been intro
duced to the Pythagorean Theorem.
Are the two ranches the same size or is one bigger than the other?
Rancher 3
Just as Rancher 2 sadly realizes Rancher 1 has the larger ranch,
a stranger enters the longhorn Saloon and says, “I’m new to this
here county. I just purchased 48 miles of barbed wire to fence in
my circle-shaped ranch.” does rancher 1 still have the largest
ranch in the county? See Figure 1.5
Rancher #1
20
P = 48 miles 12
A = 96 square miles
16
Rancher #2
P = 48 miles
A = 95 square miles 19
5 5
19
Stranger
C = 48 miles
A = 183.35 square miles
C = 48
FIgurE 1.5
and the radius [r] is half the diameter (r = 7.64). the area of the
circle must be
12 20
16
FIgurE 1.6
2. the ability to step back and assess one’s own work, including:
• monitoring one’s own progress; and
• realizing when an avenue being pursued is not working.
Some math educators refer to metacognition as executive control.
Other math educators discount metacognition as simply a part of cogni
tion, which may account for significantly less research on metacognition
in mathematics than in reading.
Effective learning requires that students take responsibility for their
own learning. Students can be taught how to recognize when they under
stand and when they need more information. They need to be able and to
know when to ask themselves, “Is what I am doing actually working? Am
I on the right track?” Reading educators talk about the “gradual release
of responsibility,” a systematic way of encouraging and helping students
to make decisions about their learning, acting upon their decisions, and
being responsible for them.
Metacognitive processes are not generic across subject areas and
should not be taught as general thinking skills or strategies. In Com
prehending Math: Adapting Reading Strategies to Teach Mathematics, K–6
(2006), I emphasized the need to modify and adapt reading strategies
for math rather than use the exact same strategies, which will not work.
Reading experts are oriented toward processes and although they do ad
dress big concepts such as figures of speech, which subsume smaller con
cepts such as metaphor, simile, personification, metonymy, and so on, their
focus is not on conceptual knowledge. Mathematicians and math educa
tors are definitely oriented toward conceptual knowledge, but they must
have a combined focus of conceptual knowledge and processes. The Na
tional Council of Teachers of Mathematics publishes guidelines for both
content standards (algebra, geometry, measurement, number and opera
tions, and data analysis) and process standards (problem solving, making
connections, creating representations, reasoning, and communication),
all of which require attention for effective teaching (NCTM 2000).
Students rarely build new knowledge alone; research indicates (Lesh and
Doerr 2003) that students benefit from interactive opportunities to ar
ticulate their own and challenge each others’ ideas, and, in doing so,
reconstruct their own ideas.
Our own six big ideas, detailed below, build on mathematical re
search and principles in order to help teachers put them into practice in
the classroom. The six big ideas overlap, interact, mutually support one
another, and provide the foundation of our teaching:
1. Teachers broaden their view of problem solving to move beyond
the traditional story problem to building mathematical models of
situations and phenomena.
2. Students make connections—tap into their prior knowledge—
among the problem they are working on and their lives, the
world around them, and the mathematical concepts they know.
3. Students create their own meaningful representations (language,
objects, pictures, actions, lists, tables, graphs, equations) of
increasing abstraction.
4. Students solve problems involving the same concept in multiple
different contexts to build a generalized understanding of the
concept.
5. Teachers use cognitively-based planning for language, connec
tions, contexts, and representations.
6. Teachers put all the above together in the Braid Model of prob
lem solving.
and
beliefs.
Misconception
research has not shown this traditional approach to be consis-
knowledge.
believe that:
itself;
esthetic sense)
Using Strategies
We start by working with the whole class, modeling for them our think
ing and self-questioning out loud. We ask them to visualize the situation,
to break down the story with the KWC to activate their prior relevant
knowledge with connecting questions, and to check the accuracy of their
inferences. All these questions may imply a lot of time and suggest a te
dious process, but we make it more like a brainstorming and keep a good
pace. After they have practiced this strategy with the whole class, they
23 23
FIgurE 2.1
2 23 22.978
4 22 43.818
6 21 62.353
8 20 78.384
10 19 91.652
12 18 101.851
14 17 108.444
16 16 110.851
18 15 108.000
20 14 97.980
22 13 76.210
24 12 0.000
FIgurE 2.2
Extension
use the data from the table (Figure 2.2) and make a graph. See
Figure 2.3.
120
100
80
Area
60
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Length of Base
FIgurE 2.3
A Dog-Gone Renovation
1. The Friedlanders are renovating their dog room into a recre-
ation room. They currently have walls and flooring already
installed. The problem is that their two teething terriers have
chewed and destroyed a significant portion of the baseboard,
and, thus they need to buy new baseboard to put along the
walls. The room is 21 feet by 28 feet. The baseboards come in
10-foot and 16-foot lengths. How many of each kind should
they buy?
2. If the Friedlanders want to have as few seams as possible,
how many of each size baseboards should they buy? Also,
suppose the cost per 10-foot baseboard is $7.97 and the cost
per 16-foot baseboard is $14.97, what would be the total cost
of supplies for this project?
3. If the Friedlanders want to have as little waste as possible,
how many of each size baseboard should they buy? Also,
suppose the cost per 10-foot baseboard is $7.97 and the cost
tion 2. In what ways are they alike? In what ways are they
Immediately, you can see three main differences between the Dog-
Gone Renovation Problem and the Extreme Classroom Makeover:
1. Students don’t have to perform any Internet research (which
do on their own);
and
solving process.
In general, the more connections of the right kind, the more examples in
different but relevant contexts, the more elaborate the networks of ideas
and relationships, the deeper, richer, more generalized our understanding
of a concept will be. Making connections is at the heart of doing mathe
matics—from simple connections about how two things are related (for
example .1 and 1/10) to major breakthroughs in understanding (such as
realizing that multiplication is not “making something bigger,” but that it
could mean having only part of a group, as in .25 * 84, or having multiple
groups of an amount smaller than one, as in 84 * .25).
How do we help students make good and accurate connections? It
is folly to take an extreme position at either end of the spectrum—that
connections are made by students only by discovery or only by direct
instruction. Such extremes in teaching are successful only in unusual
circumstances. Humans learn well when they encounter many examples
and try to make sense of them, try to see a pattern. At some point in this
work the students profit greatly from a good explanation that connects to
their specific experiences and examples. The explanation enhances the
meaning of the examples and helps organize them. Conversely, if students
do not have some initial examples and experiences to draw on, then even
the most cogent, brilliantly worded explanation does not connect to any
prior knowledge.
here?
What are some other math ideas that are related to this one?
From Comprehending Math: Adapting Reading Strategies to Teach Mathematics, K–6 by Arthur Hyde. Copyright ©
2006 by Arthur Hyde. Published by Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH. All rights reserved.
possible?
• I think that the hotter it is, the more soda drank to keep those
people cool. That’s why we’re (IL) in the middle. Not too hot, not
too cold.
Even if the kids don’t naturally ask these questions or make similar com
ments, still record what they say and treat it as valuable information, but
you may want to use some teacher-directed questioning techniques to
derive these thoughts.
As they responded, I recorded their questions and comments on large
chart paper. My hand was on fire recording their responses. I was excited
because embedded in these simple responses were valuable MW, MS, and
MM connections. You may even want to color-code the connections or
group them under specific chart headings to be even more explicit dur
ing the large-group discussion—connections that I had not shoved down
their throats, but connections that they had naturally derived within the
first five minutes of class!
We are bombarded daily with data tables, charts, diagrams, and
graphs in newspapers and all forms of media. If ever there were a time
FIgurE 2.4
thoughts and then to the table and look at the way the data is displayed.
Students notice the alphabetical listing of the states, which makes answer
ing the following questions cumbersome. Which state has the highest con
sumption? Which state has the lowest consumption? Students easily recognize
the difficulty of answering an order question when the data is not displayed
in that format—except for the one student mentioned earlier who predicted
that there was some relationship between geographic location of each state
and the number of gallons of soft drinks purchased. Some skeptical student
suggests ordering the data from high to low because they don’t quickly see
the insight that the other student has seen.
Once the data is ordered, more students notice the highest sales oc
cur in the southern states. We then have the students use a map to ex
amine this connection. Students choose two color markers and color the
highest eight states in one color and the seven lowest in another color.
Have the students alternate coloring between the high and low states for
an even more dramatic revelation. Color the highest state in red, then the
lowest in blue. Next, color the second highest red and then the second
lowest blue. Continue in this fashion until . . . ? How would you know
when to stop? The eighth lowest state is not touching the other low ones
See Figure 2.5.
of Increasing Abstraction
FIgurE 2.5
Types of Representations
Let’s look at how students can incorporate representations into their
problem solving. For example, if the teacher asked students to find all
the triangles with integer sides that had a perimeter of 48 (a somewhat
different question than the previous one in which students were asked
to determine which triangle was larger), the students might try all of the
representations that we mentioned earlier and others we’ve seen:
• manipulatives: pushpins, string, and rulers;
• actions: three students represent three vertices, pulling a 48-inch
circle of rope while a fourth student measures;
• pictorial: drawing on graph paper with ruler and compass or free
hand sketching;
• recording data with symbols;
• organizing data into tables;
• graphing data on rectangular coordinates;
• language (oral and written) are used throughout.
Using Equations In some problems, students will create equations to
represent and model the data. Every time one manipulates the symbols
of an equation to change its form, the new equation will show you a dif
ferent aspect of the relationships or a new relationship entirely. We tell
students, it’s going to tell you a different story each time. For example,
Heron’s formula is traditionally presented as: A = √ s(s – a)(s – b)(s – c)
where s = (a + b + c)/2, which is the semi-perimeter. In one sense,
the formula is very simple and emphasizes the semi-perimeter, which
introduces a fourth variable (s). The formula that we have been using
A = 1/4 √ (a + b + c)(a + b – c)(a – b + c)(–a + b + c), which also requires
multiplying four lengths together. We like it because we can help the stu
dents see that the formula uses the perimeter (a + b + c) and each of the
other three terms can be seen as the way you’d check to see if you really
had a legitimate triangle: the sum of any two sides must be greater than
the third side (the triangle sum theorem).
Using Language Language representations are notoriously tricky; words
can be ambiguous or have multiple connotations. In general, teachers
help students move from their natural language of the world to more
precise and abstract mathematical terminology. But even this translation
depends on language!
Students need many experiences with different language and commu
nication modes: the language of reasoning, procedural language, descrip
tive language, reflective language, and the language of explanation. These
modes characterize different functions or purposes and have different
Metarepresentations
Researchers have begun studying representational fluency, also known as
meta-representation, which is the capability a student has to construct,
critique, and refine a variety of representational forms. It refers to a per
son creating a representation appropriate for a particular problem, math
ematical task, or situation/context and not simply imposing a standard
representation. Such highly appropriate representations are essentially
models. Students need to be able to create with various representational
systems so that their creations truly embody their internal images and
conceptual systems. Representational fluency is especially valuable in
communicating conceptions and in flexibly using them to develop solu
tions to real-life problems.
Researchers have found that with minimal intervention from a teach
er, students can develop metarepresentational competence. Developing
competence is enhanced by students talking with other students to test
representations, getting feedback from peers. Through continual cycles
of representing for a specific purpose, creating, producing, sharing, cri
tiquing, and revising, students are able to improve their representations
considerably. Copying a teacher’s representation is not enough. Creating
something of their own, something that they understand intimately, is
If you are thinking that (21, 23, 25, 27, 29) comes next, you are cor
rect. There is clearly a pattern to this symbolic notation, and although it
is somewhat abstract, the only concept you need to know is odd numbers.
You would have to discern that each set has one more element in it than
the previous set and be aware that if you keep a cumulative total of the
number of elements, you will have 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, which are the first five
triangle numbers. Let’s arrange the sets like a triangle. See Figure 2.6.
In number theory there are sets of numbers that were seen by the
ancient Greeks to correspond to patterns that were like polygons. Most
familiar are the square numbers: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, and so on. The triangle
numbers are one way of representing a fundamental pattern of growth,
each successive number is added to the cumulative total. This summation
is readily seen when objects are arranged in the shape of a triangle.
O O O O O
OO OO OO OO
OOO OOO OOO
OOOO OOOO
OOOOO
Cumulative
Total 1 3 6 10 15
1
3 5
7 9 11
13 15 17 19
21 23 25 27 29
31 33 35 37 39 41
43 45 47 49 51 53 55
57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71
73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89
FIgurE 2.6
1 1
3 5 8
7 9 11 27
13 15 17 19 64
21 23 25 27 29 125
31 33 35 37 39 41 216
43 45 47 49 51 53 55 343
57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 512
73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 729
FIgurE 2.7
FIgurE 2.8
• How does this new information relate to making a big cube and creat
ing its layers?
Eventually, when we review the problem together as a class, we hand
out a picture that shows why the sum of consecutive odd numbers are
perfect cubes. See Figure 2.9. How do our students benefit from work
ing with cubes to create layers and by analyzing the picture we hand out
during class review?
FIgurE 2.9
CONCEPT
contex t D problems 1, 2, . . . n
problems 1, 2, . . . n context A
context B
context C
problems 1, 2, . . . n
REP B3
REP B2 REP C3
REP B1 REP C2
REP C1
REP A3
REP A2
REP A1
Generalized
CONCEPT
Figure 2.10
Problem 2: Take the same days as problem 1 and record the high
and low degrees in Celsius. Enter the data on a table. repeat
problem 1. Calculate: How many degrees Celsius change oc-
curred? Which day had the greatest change? By how much?
FIgurE 2.11
are different and their “degrees” are not the same size. Freez-
ing and boiling points are 32 and 212 versus 0 and 100. Is
same number?
When sure that all the students have developed good local concep
tual development of negative integers in the context of temperature, the
teacher will introduce a different context for negative integers with mul
tiple problems (for example, Context B— the planet Earth, with altitudes
of mountains above sea level, depths of the oceans below sea level, and
certain locations on the face of the earth as below sea level.) She repeats
the process of debriefing of each problem and pulling together how these
problems in this context conceive of the concept. If the students don’t
bring it up first, she asks them to compare and contrast the representa
tions and the meanings of the concept in each context. The three-pronged
arrows in Figure 2.10 are meant to signify this comparing and contrasting
of the representation and meaning in different contexts (the figure shows
three contexts interacting).
Then the teacher encourages the students to strip away all the dif
ferences among the three contexts and push for the commonalities. She
guides them in building understanding, moving to more abstract repre
sentations that are less and less concerned with the particular features of
each context. Through this guidance she is helping them build a general
ized understanding of the concept that can be used in a variety of other
contexts. (Note the solid arrow coming from the interactions among the
three contexts to the generalization.) A reasonable assessment of how
generalized the concept is within a student’s knowledge would be for
the teacher to introduce problems in new contexts in which the concept
could possibly be used. Can the student make the connection (for ex
ample, debits and credits)?
How do you think about the mathematical concepts you teach and how
do you talk about them to students? Motivating students by getting them
to buy into the problem is extremely important. When planning lessons
or units, write out a list of questions to ask yourself, such as:
• What is the main concept of this problem?
• Why am I choosing to use this problem?
• To what other concepts is this related?
• How will I initiate this problem, story problem, or activity? (How
will I pitch it?)
• What questions will I ask?
These two seemingly disparate areas are both based on cognition. Read
ing is the dynamic process of deriving meaning from written language
and requires some special thinking about what one knows already (prior
knowledge) and one’s experiences (especially with language). Readers
interact with what they read. They do not passively receive its meaning.
They create it for themselves. They use what they know about the con
tent of the text, how texts of this kind are structured, and the particular
vocabulary.
Research has identified several highly effective cognitive strategies
for students to use in reading comprehension, and specific teaching tech
niques for helping students use these strategies have been developed
(Keene and Zimmermann 2007, Harvey and Goudvis 2007, Miller 2002).
There are seven fairly broad reading comprehension strategies, each of
which encompasses a number of more focused strategies, techniques, or
activities.
1. Making Connections: activating relevant prior knowledge, link
ing what is in the text to their own experiences, discerning the
context; relating what is in the text to other things they’ve read,
to things in the real world, to phenomena around them;
2. Asking Questions: actively wondering, raising uncertainties,
considering possibilities, searching for relationships, making up
“what if” scenarios;
hypothesizing;
Simply applying these strategies to math does not go far enough because
meaning making and comprehension in mathematics requires deep con
ceptual understanding of abstract ideas. These strategies must be adapted
to work in mathematics (Hyde 2006).
Students must engage in five mathematical processes if they are to
understand mathematical concepts (NCTM 2000):
1. Problem Solving: building new mathematical knowledge, solving
Math teachers may want to think of these as the givens, goals, and con
straints, but we go far beyond the traditional use of those terms.
We found that our three KWC questions provided a good structure
and focus for our students during the reading of a story problem. The
teachers modeled these questions for the whole class. They became the
key questions when students met in small groups to “Discuss the prob
lem.” These questions provided a structure for the students to work in
their groups. They connected with their prior knowledge. After using
this strategy in small groups, students used these questions when they
worked on story problems individually.
MATHEMATICAL PRoCESSES
READING
CoMPREHENSIoN Problem Reasoning
STRATEGIES Connections Communications Representation
Solving & Proof
making connections
asking questions
visualizing
inferring
predicting
determining
importance
synthesizing
FIgurE 2.12
DATA PROBABILITY
Experimental
Probability
FIgurE 2.14
Measurement Experimental
Data Probability
FIgurE 2.15
Geometric
Measurement
Geometric
Measurement
Data
Geometric
Data Measurement
Data
DATA
FIgurE 2.16
We can see from Figure 2.16 that there are concepts—and there
fore, problems and activities addressing those concepts—that come from
different places in the complex interconnectedness of mathematics. For
example, there are measurement concepts that do not involve geometry:
temperature, money, time, mass/weight, capacity. Likewise, there are
measurement concepts that are geometric in nature: length, area, volume,
angular measure.
What would the intersecting geometric data include? Then what are
the geometry concepts that do not involve data or measurement? Ex
amples would be symmetry, similarity, tessellations. Why are we making
such a big deal out of these distinctions? Several reasons are:
1. Intersections of these strands are places of “natural” connec
tions in mathematics. If we are interested in helping students see
mathematics as a coherent interconnected whole, these are great
places to start.
2. We have less than 180 days each school year to teach about 100
concepts. (Granted some are review.) If we hit only one con
cept per lesson, kids would never have enough time to build
measurement
data
probability
measurement data
experimental probability
Note: We have left out some logically possible intersections because they
are not especially potent in the middle school curriculum and we have
incorporated any valuable ideas or concepts into a related strand (for ex
ample, geometric data is included in geometric measurement data).
algebra
Not easily. People have tried many times in many ways to conceptualize
the math curriculum. What we can illustrate by example is the way we
have arranged content for teaching math in the middle grades. Figure
2.17 shows the four foundation strands (geometry, measurement, prob
ability, and data) and the four intersections, which we will also refer to
as strands. When people talk about real-world uses of mathematics and
real-life connections, these four intersections are where they reside. If you
are looking for science and social studies connections to mathematics,
here is where you’ll find them.
The two other strands shown in Figure 2.17 are numbers and alge
bra. We believe that we need to seize every opportunity to build number
work into activities and problems that come from the eight strands. Al
though there are some activities that reside solely in the realm of number,
we are cautious to make sure they will really help students. Too often in
their pasts, our students have been dramatically unsuccessful in working
with “naked numbers”—computations that refer to nothing. We all have
students who are not proficient in some, many, or all aspects of computa
tion. We have found that the best ways to help them master computation
is by first working in activities and problems that are sufficiently real that
they can imagine the situation and are motivated to find a solution. They
need problems to help them conceive of what these operations are really
all about. Multiplication does not always make things bigger. Subtraction
does not always take something away from a total. The textbook may be
trying to get them to memorize the order of operations when what they
need is to understand the meaning of operations. Therefore, you will find
many activities in this book that you can use to “swing back” and have
the kids work in an interesting motivating context, while learning the
arithmetic they failed to learn when taught in a more traditional fashion.
What about algebra? Here is where it gets interesting. We think of al
gebra much in the same way we think of numbers. Both provide us ways to
look at relationships and patterns and to symbolically represent real life sit
uations. Granted, algebra is more abstract than numbers, but in many ways
algebra is generalized arithmetic. Its abstractness comes in handy when we
are trying to describe or represent the general case or to generalize across
many cases. In every one of those eight strands, algebra is used in some
way, for example, in tables, graphs, and equations to see how different rep
resentations of the same situation or phenomena reveal different features
of its nature. In the same vein, you don’t have to look hard to find algebraic
formulas in geometry and probability. In this book we have explicitly built
algebra into many places that traditional texts have not. Algebra should be
as pervasive as numbers for students in grades 5–8.
Like number work, in algebra there is a place for working directly
with the manipulation of symbols—the rules of the road—legitimate
GEOMETRY MEASUREMENT
Geometric
Measurement
Geometric
Measurement
Data
NUMBER
and ALGEBRA
COMPUTATION Geometric
Measurement
Data
Data
Experimental
Probability
Theoretical
Probability
PROBABILITY
FIgurE 2.17
EARLY ALGEBRA
Students all across the United States now take formal algebra courses
in middle school. Pushing the traditional Algebra I course down into
eighth grade as the honors, gifted, or accelerated course for a handful
of students may be justifiable, but wholesale herding all eighth graders
into traditional Algebra I will not produce scholars. It will most likely
produce failures.
I was in seventh grade in October 1957, when the Soviets sent Sput
nik up and scared the marinara sauce out of U.S. politicians, educators,
and mathematicians. Our first response was to sort students into tracks
sooner and more diligently, accompanied by standardized testing of all
sorts. Let’s find the best and the brightest and funnel them into math and
science. And by the way, we don’t want our little Wernher von Brauns in
any of the same classes with the pre–gas station track students.
Our second response was to slam-dunk the elementary schools
with the New Math, rather abstract set theory–based arithmetic pro
grams. The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change (Sarason
1971) includes a brilliant case study analyzing how the designers and
implementers of the New Math completely misread the so-called behav
ioral regularities of schools that were far stronger than the ill-conceived
implementation plans.
Morris Kline, mathematician and author of dozens of books that
show the interconnectedness and coherence of mathematics, had his
own critique of the New Math. In Why Johnny Can’t Add (1964), Kline
laid much of the blame of the failure of New Math on the mathemati
cians who insisted that math be taught in a highly deductive manner that
they thought was “rigorous” but that inexorably led to students trying to
memorize definitions, procedures, and formulas they didn’t understand.
I am concerned that we are on the brink of making an analogous
mistake with algebra, pressing its abstractness downward because with
68 some students it appears that we can. For fifty years educators have
FIgurE 3.1
10 1 0 0 4 0 10
3 3 0 1 2 3
1 0 4
FIgurE 3.2
When everyone had filled their rectangles, I show them my way that
groups all the ones blocks together in one corner, opposite the hundreds
block, which makes it easier to see what is going on. See Figure 3.1.
Next I pass out blue and yellow pencils so students can shade in the
two colors on their graph paper. I ask what shapes, and how many of
them, they’ve created. They reply, “Four rectangles.” I then ask them to
write the dimensions of each rectangle on its outside and write the area
of each rectangle on its inside. See Figure 3.2.
”How would you figure the area?” I ask. The students add up the
areas of the four rectangles. “Do you have to add them in a particular
order?” Some say no, some aren’t sure. “The four rectangles would give
us four partial products,” I continue.
The tricky maneuver is the 10 times 4. It is much easier to ask
students, “What color is it?” The 10-by-10 is, of course, the yellow
hundreds square, which is easy for students to see. Armed with this
information, students can now add the four partial products to find the
overall product of 182:
14
* 13
12 3 * 4 = 12
30 3 * 10 = 30
40 10 * 4 = 40
100 10 * 10 = 100
182
We do a few more examples and then repeat the process without the
base ten blocks, just using graph paper. See Figure 3.3.
1 0 1 0
4 4
1 0 5
FIgurE 3.3
7
30
26 20 20
6
6
37
FIgurE 3.4
14
*13
42
14
182
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
FIgurE 3.5
3 * 4 = 12 3 * 40 = ?
• How many of the 3-by-4 rectangles will fit in the 3-by-40
rectangle?
• Mark off the right side of the 3-by-4 rectangle each time
you place it down on the 3-by-40 rectangle.
• So, the 3-by-40 rectangle is ___ times as big as the 3-by-4
rectangle.
3 * 40 = 3 * 4 * (10) = 12 * 10 = 120
3 * 4 = 12 4 * 30 = ?
• How many of the 3-by-4 rectangles will fit in the 4-by-30
rectangle?
• Mark off the bottom of the 3-by-4 rectangle each time you
place it down on the 4-by-30 rectangle.
• So, the 4-by-30 rectangle is ___ times as big as the 3-by-4
rectangle.
4 * 30 = 4 * 3 * (10) = 12 * 10 = 120
We typically have students go through the red dots with the 3-by 4
rectangle and then two or three others to make sure that they fully under
stand what it means to multiply by powers of 10.
Algebra Tiles
To help students understand relationships expressed algebraically in for
mulas, equations, and expressions, it is valuable to take a step back from
the symbolic abstractions and draw on geometric expressions, which are
often better connected to students’ experiences. Several geometric tools
are available on the market today, but one in particular, Algebra Tiles, is
directly related to partial products. Students who have had good experi
ences with the rectangle model of multiplication and partial products will
be able to transfer that learning to Algebra Tiles because both are based
on the distributive property of multiplication over addition.
There are several different ways to use these pieces, but here I’ll focus
on polynomial multiplication. The small square may be considered to be
1-by-1(with an area of 1 square unit) and the large square x-by-x (with
an area of x2 ). The long rectangle would have side length of 1 and x and
its area would be x square units.
1 1 1 x square units x x 2
They fit together nicely. Can you figure out the area of the newly
formed square?
Front x * x = x2 Outside x * 4
(x + 3 )(x + 4 )
Inside 3 * x
last 3 * 4 = 12
FIgurE 3.6
x+3
x+4
12 4 * 3 = 12
4x 4 * x = 4x
3x x * 3 = 3x
x 2
x * x = x2
x2 + 7 * + 12
FIgurE 3.7
See how the rectangles (Algebra Tiles) on the right represent the four
partial products.
The area of the long rectangle, xy square units, is actually easier for
students to understand than the long rectangle from the previous ex
ample that had 1-by-x as dimensions.
Again, the shapes fit together nicely. Can you determine the area of
the newly formed square?
x+y
x+y
PArTIAl QuOTIENTS
Janie has 52 fun-sized candy bars that she is willing to share with
her 3 friends Janice, Joanne, and Harriet. Each of the 4 friends
will share equally. How many candy bars will each friend get?
112
8 896
8
9
8
16
16
I have been told that in English schools, students do their sums and
products on graph paper, one digit per square. It is very effective in keep
ing the columns straight. The inherent difficulty of the traditional algo
rithm is that, like many general algorithms, in order to accommodate all
cases the procedure treats all numbers as if they were composed of indi
vidual digits. It is the Universal Blood Donor, O negative, everybody can
get it. But it doesn’t address place value—instead of learning it thoroughly
in second grade, students are taught to ignore place value when working
out algorithms. Talk about mixed messages—is it any wonder that many
students go through elementary school and arrive at middle school not
fully understanding place value of whole numbers, or decimals?
When we teach partial products, even when the situation concerns
equal groups, our method is to have students use rectangles. Once stu
dents understand the situation, any multiplication can be abstracted as
“naked numbers,” and those numbers can be rethought as sides of a rect
angle. With multiplication, we know the multiplier and the multiplicand
and we are trying to determine the product. With division, we know the
divisor and the dividend and we are trying to calculate the quotient. (“I’ll
take obscure arithmetic terms for 500, Alex!”)
For example, refer to the problem and solution shown in Figure 3.8.
The division is conceived in terms of a rectangle that has an area of 154
and one side of 7. Using this information, students must find out the
length of the other side. First, students take out a sheet of graph paper
Andy’s Inheritance
Andy’s Inheritance is a problem from which students learn about regroup
ing in place value up through the millions. This is a great opportunity for
students to incorporate KWC in the solving process.
10
10 10
10 10 2
FIgurE 3.8
Do you see any patterns in the table above? In the ones column, the
number of $1 bills must be a multiple of ten to get a zero in that place for
the million. That multiple of ten then would be added to the tens column
(the $10 bills). Most of the numbers in the table end in either 8 or 9 be
cause when the column to the right of them groups by tens in order to
become a zero, regrouping will occur in that cell to make it a multiple of
ten, and so on through the table.
The Andy’s Inheritance problem helps reinforce the concept of place
value in our base ten system. Students must group and regroup each of
these denominations. There are other denominations of bills that are in
circulation (for example, $2, $5, and $20); we ask students to talk about
why those bills aren’t included in the problem.
and again: 52 + 22 = 25 + 4 = 29
7265 ⇒ 114 ⇒ 18 ⇒ 65 ⇒ 61 ⇒ 37 ⇒ 58
6788 ⇒ 213 ⇒ 14 ⇒ 17 ⇒ 50 ⇒ 25 ⇒ 29 ⇒ 85 ⇒ 89 ⇒ 145
1123 ⇒ 15 ⇒ 26 ⇒ 40 ⇒ 16 ⇒ 37 ⇒ 58 ⇒ 89
3333 ⇒ 36 ⇒ 71 ⇒ 50 ⇒ 25 ⇒ 29 ⇒ 85 ⇒ 145 ⇒ 42
Note that the operator ⇒ that signifies squaring and summing digits is
not an equal sign (=), which would not be appropriate.
When I ask students if they see any patterns, their usual response
is, “Mine stopped at the number you gave me. Would it go on forever?”
I ask students to describe the patterns they see in the example above.
Their responses are all very similar: “When you square and sum the dig
its of a number repeatedly, you will eventually stop at one or go into the
eight-cycle.”
My response is that this pattern is true for the examples we looked
at, but is it always true? That gets them thinking. “What if we find a
number that does not fit that pattern?” I continue. “Examples are great
for helping us develop hypotheses, but all it takes is one counterexample
to negate our hypothesis. How would a mathematician prove that this
pattern holds for every whole number?”
“There must be some formula,” they say.
I tell them, “No. There is no formula. You have to check every num
ber; mathematicians call it proof by exhaustion. But you really don’t have
to check them all.” And I give these examples:
Extension
Ask students if all eight numbers are points of entry into the cycles. If so,
are they equally likely? The front cover of this book gives an answer. All
eight have entry points to the eight cycle, but they are not equally likely.
For a full treatment, see our website, www.braidedmath.com.
A B C D E
a3 ...B3 ...c3 ...d3 ...e3
SUM
1 2 3 4 5 1 8 27 64 125 225
2 2 5 0 0 8 8 125 141
1 4 1 0 0 1 64 1 66
6 6 0 0 0 216 216 432
4 3 2 0 0 64 27 8 99
9 9 0 0 0 729 729 1458
1 4 5 8 0 1 64 125 512 702
7 0 2 0 0 343 0 8 351
3 5 1 0 0 27 125 1 153
1 5 3 0 0 1 125 27 153
FIgurE 3.9
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
19 20 21
22 23 24
25 26 27
28 29 30
31 32 33
34 35 36
37 38 39
40 41 42
43 44 45
46 47 48
49 50 51
FIgurE 3.10
FIgurE 3.11
side length
FIgurE 3.12
You can tell that the small square is 1 by 1, so its area is 1 square
unit. The biggest square has 2 units on a side, so its area is 4
square units because it is 2 by 2. But the middle square is made
from 4 half-squares, so it must have an area of 2 square units.
What is its side length?
1 * 1 = 1 and 2 * 2 = 4. But ____ * ____ = 2?
FIgurE 3.13
1 1 1 1 1 1
1.4 1.96
2 4 2 4 2 4
Students found 1.5 to be too large (2.25) and 1.4 to be too small
(1.96). What number “squared” will make 2? They realize that it must
be between 1.4 and 1.5. Some want to try 1.45, but others say that it
must be closer to 1.4 because 1.96 was so close. Some try 1.41 and oth
ers try 1.42.
1 1 1 1 1 1
1.415 2.002225
Ever since the time I was asked to teach a lesson on proportional reason
ing, I have been amazed at the number of connections it has to related
concepts. Recently I found a great resource, Teaching Fractions and Ratios
for Understanding by Susan J. Lamon (2005). Lamon defines proportional
reasoning as the “ability to scale up and down in appropriate situations
and to supply justifications for assertions made about relationships in
situations involving simple direct proportions and inverse proportions”
(p. 3). True understanding of proportions and the ability to reason with
them requires far more than merely working with procedures based on
a/b = c/d.
Shampoo Bottle
Consider the following simple direct proportion problem:
how many shampoo washes can you do with one large bottle?
Think:
1¼ fluid ounces 1 wash
95
40 fluid ounces 32 washes
This means that the Shampoo Bottle problem boils down to taking 40/1.25
washes per bottle, which is equal to 32.
This direct solution is not what middle school students would im
mediately “see,” which would require strong understanding of division,
particularly repeated subtraction, to reason, “How many times can I pour
out 1.25 ounces from 40?” Keeping that in mind, using a table makes
working on the problem more accessible to students. Notice how the
table emphasizes both horizontal and vertical patterns:
times 2 1¼ to 1 times 2
times 2 2½ to 2 times 2
times 8 5 to 4 times 8
40 to 32
If 6 cats can catch and kill 6 rats in 6 minutes, how many cats will
it take to catch and kill 100 rats in 50 minutes? Try solving this
problem in more than one way.
FIgurE 4.1
1 1 6
100 100 6
4 100 150
12 100 50
Notice for the third row, if we multiply minutes by 25, then we would
have to divide the number of cats by 25. Alternatively, for the fifth row,
if we divide minutes by 3, then we would have to multiply the number
of cats by 3.
From the table we can generalize the following:
x y z
a b c
x*z=a*c
y b
6 6 6
? 100 50
6 * 6 = 50 * z z = 3600 = 12 cats
6 100 300
TABLE PRoPoRTIoN
people product time
3 5 8 3 * 8/5 = x * 24/100
3 15 24 100 * 24/5 = 24x
1 5 24 100/5 = x
20 100 24 20 = x
All of the story problems in the previous section, and others of similar
mathematical structure, require some form of multiplication of quanti
ties. However, students deserve the chance to understand specifically
why multiplication, as opposed to addition, is the appropriate opera
tion. It certainly takes, as Lamon states, some “degree of mathematical
maturity to understand the difference between adding and multiplying
and contexts in which each operation is appropriate” (2005). In fact,
one of the most difficult concepts for students to understand is the
multiplicative, not additive, nature of proportionality. As a result, before
using the Shampoo Bottle, Cats and Rats, and Making Seismographs
problems, it’s necessary for teachers to get an idea of their students’
understanding of the difference between additive and multiplicative
transformations.
Understanding Ratios
Once my students had a solid understanding of the differences between
additive and multiplicative transformations, I moved back a step further
and asked, “How do students initially conceive of ratios?” Lamon’s re
search suggests that:
FIgurE 4.2
FIgurE 4.3
FIgurE 4.4
FIgurE 4.5
2 $3 $3/2 3 $4 $4/3
4 $6 $3/2 4 $5.33 $4/3
6 $9 $3/2 6 $8 $4/3
12 $18 $3/2 12 $16 $4/3
1 $1.50 $3/2 1 $1.33 $4/3
1 $1.50 $3/2 1 $1.33 $4/3
$6
$4
$2
$0
0 5 10 15
Weight
FIgurE 4.6
We will tell Indy to travel for one hour and then stop. The Indy train
started, but the students decided he went too far for one hour.
Why do you think he went too far? He was only supposed to go 1/14
of the distance (fifty miles) and he went too far across the room for
only one hour. The students helped position the train correctly;
I reassured them all that the actors do not have be exact, we just
have to visualize what is going on—the relationships between the
two trains.
How far did he travel? How many miles were covered? He went fifty
miles and there are 650 miles left.
Now it is 2 a.m. What happens? Indy traveled one hundred miles
(fifty miles each hour). There are six hundred miles left. (We agreed
that the person moved correctly.) Now NYC has to get ready to
leave.
Now it is 3 a.m. What is going on? Indy is now at one hundred fifty
miles and NYC is at seventy miles.
How far between them? 700 – (150 + 70) = 480 miles left. They
covered 120 miles.
How will we know when to stop? They will be at the same place and
the total miles covered will be seven hundred miles.
Extensions
1. Both trains travel 50 mph. When and where will they meet?
2. Both trains travel 70 mph. When and where will they meet?
3. The faster train leaves 2 hours earlier than the slower train.
When and where will they meet?
4. Both trains leave at the same time. When and where will they
meet?
FIgurE 4.7
laverne and Shirley are partners who paint houses (exteriors and
interiors). They have estimated how long it will take to paint the
kitchen and dining room of mr. ragusa’s house. laverne estimat-
ed that she could do it in 10 hours by herself; Shirley estimated
that she could do it in 15 hours by herself.
How long would it take them to do the job if they worked
together?
Hint: How much of the job (what part of the whole job) could
be done if they worked 1 hour together? If they worked 5 hours
together?
FIgurE 4.8
FIgurE 4.9
fifteen hours, so would do one-fifteenth of the job in one hour. The table
shows the amount completed by the pair in that first hour would be 1/10
+ 1/15 = 1/6.
It was clear for several students, just after the first entry in the table,
exactly how long it would take Laverne and Shirley collectively to com
plete the job. If they can do one-sixth of the job in one hour, they’d need
six hours to do the job. But because I knew just how dangerous drawing
conclusions could be by looking at just one case, I encouraged them to
complete the table to prove to me that the pattern they’d begun to recog
nize was indeed true for the entire table. I also prompted students with
the following questions:
• Suppose you figured out the pattern after two hours of work. What
would your train of thought have been?
• Suppose you figured out the pattern after three hours of work. What
would your train of thought have been?
The groups enthusiastically worked with their new level of under
standing the rate problem. After a few minutes, I noticed that there was
just enough time left in the class period for debriefing. We again dis
cussed the value of using a table to uncover the data.
If one painter takes a hours and the other takes b hours, then:
x+x=1 bx + ax = 1 x(a + b) = ab x= ab
a b ab a+b .
ab
The expression x = is quite amazing: the product of two
a+b
numbers divided by their sum. The harmonic mean is a2ab +b
.
ab
Therefore, is one-half of the harmonic mean.
a+b
Will and grace recently visited their old college buddy, Faith.
driving to the college (120 miles away), they averaged 60 miles
per hour (mph). Coming home, there was more traffic and they
only averaged 40 mph. What was the average rate in miles per
hour of the round trip?
FIgurE 4.10
FIgurE 4.11
Two Ladders
Imagine two buildings separated by a narrow alley. One building
is 10 feet high, the other is 15 feet high. The alley between them
is 8 feet across. A ladder is placed from the base of one building
up to the roof of the other building. A second ladder is placed on
the opposite building in the same manner (from the base of one
to the roof of the other).
larry goes up one ladder and mo goes up the other. Curley stands
on the ground at the place where the two ladders cross each
other so that he can hand materials to larry and mo. How high
off the ground is the place where the two ladders cross?
First, the class thought through the basic facts using KWC:
• There are two buildings, with heights of ten and fifteen feet.
• There are three guys.
15 ft
10 ft
y 8-y
8 ft
FIgurE 4.12
10 ft
x
8-y
8 ft
FIgurE 4.13
15 x
A. = y
(larger triangles)
8
10 x
B. = 8 – y (smaller triangles)
8
C. 15y = 8x
D. 8x = 10(8 – y)
E. 15y = 10(8 – y)
15 8–y
F. = y
10
3 8–y
G. = y
2
FIgurE 4.14
C. 8x = 80 – 10y
D. 4x = 40 – 5y
E. 8x = 15y
F. 5y = 40 – 4x
G. 8x = 3(5y)
H. 8x = 3(40 – 4x)
I. 20x = 120 x = 6
10 ft 15 ft
x
y 12-y
12 ft
FIgurE 4.15
10 x
A. = 12 – y
12
15 x
B. = y
12
D. 6x = 60 – 5y
E. 12x = 15y
F. 5y = 60 – 6x
G. 12x = 3(5y)
I. 30x = 180
J. x=6
How could the answer be six feet again? Is this a mistake? What is
going on?
The power of algebra is in its ability to represent complex situations
and to show us what is going on in a more general case. This is a very
counterintuitive problem. The two buildings are different heights. One
would assume that changing the distance between them (like changing
the heights) would change the height at which they cross. Surprise! Of
course, that means that this is not just one problem. At least two are
needed to see what is going on. Then proof comes from the generalization
of algebraic representations of proportions. See Figure 4.17
Note that two different manipulations of the symbols in Figure
4.17 both have the variable d drop out. It is not related to the x vari
able, which is only dependent upon a and b. This means the distance
(d) between buildings has no effect on the crossing height of the two
ladders (x). That height is only effected by the heights of the two build
ings (a and b). The crossing height (x) is one-half the harmonic mean
of a and b. Wow!
x d–y x y x d–y x y
= = Or = =
a d b d a d b d
x d y x y by
= – =1– dx = ad – ay xd = by d=
a d d a d x
x x
= 1– ( by )x = a( by ) – ay
a b x x
x x aby
+ =1 by = – ay
a b x
bx + ax aby
=1 ay + by =
ab x
a ft b ft
x aby
x(a + b) = ab y(a + b) = x(a + b) = ab
d-y
x
y
ab ab
x= x=
d ft a+b a+b
FIgurE 4.18
FIgurE 4.19
FIgurE 4.20
Before students even begin the first problem, ask them to look at the
relationship between the altitudes and bases for each tent in questions
1 and 2. Do they notice anything familiar about the numbers 36 and 45
and 21 and 28? Why, they’re consecutive triangular numbers! Remind
students that the product of any two consecutive triangular numbers (in
this case, 36 and 45 and 21 and 28) is always divisible by their sum—the
quotient of which is always one-half the harmonic mean. Of course we
want our students to develop their proportional reasoning skills using
similar triangle properties, so discuss solving questions 1 and 2 in the
following manner:
By using similar triangles we can set up the following proportions:
Question 1
36 36 – s
= s
35
36s = 45(36 – s)
36s = 1620 – 45s
81s = 1620
s = 20 decimeters → check . . . is 20 the ½ harmonic mean of 36 and 45?
(Yes!)
Question 2
28 28 – s
=
21 s
28s = 21(28 – s)
28s = 588 – 28s
Now solve question 3 using the same proportional reasoning strategy and
see just what pops up . . . Remember in question 3, we are supposed to let
a = altitude, b = base, and s =side length of square.
Question 3
a = a–s
b s
as = b(a – s)
as = ab – bs
as + bs = ab
s(a + b) = ab
AND MoDELING
FIgurE 5.1
Students pulled out their math reflective logs and began to jot down
their thoughts for five minutes. My students are very good at using their
math logs to communicate a variety of messages to me—their under
standings, confusions, predictions, questions, and analyses—all of which
they communicate in a variety of representations—pictures, drawings,
graphs, tables, equations, words, and lists. During those five minutes, I
saw a number of students hone in on the length of their arm span and
their heights almost immediately. Students also worked in small groups
FIgurE 5.2
One student said, while demonstrating with his hands, “It’ll be a line,
’cuz as one thing increases, then so does the height.”
“What kind of a line?” I asked. I showed them with my arm different
types of slanted, vertical, and horizontal lines. I could tell immediately
that while students could follow directions on the activity sheet about
which variable to put where on the coordinate plane, they did not under
stand why they were placed that way. My question lead into an incredibly
valuable discussion on independent and dependent variables and how
we figure out conceptually where to place each variable. The discussion
came in handy during later linear function activities.
I walked my students through the meaning of the statement “the
dependent variable depends upon the independent variable” by referring
to a variety of activities we had done earlier in the year. One of the activi
ties was a campsite problem that involved two variables, the number of
campsites rented and the amount of money made. In that context, my
students understood that the amount of money made clearly depended
upon the number of campsites rented—which is why when we graphed
our data, we plotted the amount of money made (the dependent variable)
on the y-axis and the number of campsites rented (the independent vari
able) on the x-axis.
One persistent student then asked, “So, what’s this got to do with
our arm span and height topic? Couldn’t it technically be that either one
depends on the other?”
“Yes,” I replied, “mathematically and graphically you’ll see a simi
lar picture.”
Most of the class responded with, “Huh?”, which prompted me to go
to the board and sketch the pictures using what I call “nice numbers.”
See Figure 5.3.
Students agreed that both tables graphed a similar picture—a straight
line that rose to the right. One student suggested that it would be more
reasonable to use option 1 because, she said, “our spinal cord is devel
oped before our arms” before we are born—which implied that the length
of our arm span should depend upon our height. I was impressed with her
math-to-world connection! I heard a lot of “Oh yeah!” and “That’s what
we just learned in human development class!” from other students. I
couldn’t help but remind them just how connected mathematics is to the
real world, especially their school world. As a result of our conversations,
Arm Span
20
(inches)
0
0 20 40
40
Arm Span
20 Height (inches)
(inches)
Arm Span (in.) Height (in.)
0
10 10
0 20 40
15 20
Height (inches) 30 comp to add
30 tables
40
comp to add
Arm tables
(inches)
40 0 20 40
30 30
Height (inchH )
Day 3
As the third day of our Vitruvian Man activity began, some students
voiced surprise that their data from the previous day did not form a per
fectly straight line and asked if creating a line of best fit—a term they had
either heard or learned the previous year, and something we would return
to at the end of our unit—would help them understand that the data had
a linear progression. See Figure 5.5.
I jumped in immediately and said, “Yes, it would, and later we’ll talk
about how to figure out the exact rule for the line of best fit and we’ll even
ask the folks at Texas Instruments what they think.” I got the idea from Art
to have my kids use angel hair pasta instead of rulers, because the rulers—
yes, even the clear ones—are often too thick and wide to see through, often
resulting in much inaccuracy. I made the decision to come back to the
messy data at the end of our unit so that students could better understand
how to use their newly acquired algebra language (slope, intercepts, slope-
intercept form). In the meantime, I proposed a variation of our activity:
Extension
Determine the line of best fit by considering every point in the
data set, instead of the minimum requirement, which is 2.
FIgurE 5.5
In the past I have had students calculate average ranges for a fixed
domain. Because these points have the same domain, they lie right on
top of one another, with the line of best fit in between them. In essence,
students predict that for a given value of our x-variable, what is a likely
value for the y-variable? Depending on your students’ mathematical abil
ity, you might have them examine the correlation coefficient to see just
how closely fitting their line of best fit is to their data. This conceptual ap
proach can be accomplished by having the students analyze their graphs,
their tables, and the position of the points they plotted in relation to their
line of best fit.
By the end of the third day, in our debriefing session, we discussed the
results of students’ Vitruvian Man data analysis. It was really interesting to
FIgurE 5.6
Day 4
On the final day of our Vitruvian Man activity, students gathered their
tables, graphs, and data analysis to complete, partially in groups and as
individuals, a final discussion. See Figure 5.8.
I required students to use an inductive reasoning approach to form
generalizations about the human body’s actual proportions. As I men
tioned earlier, my goal was for students to understand and be able to
synthesize the connections among various mathematics concepts, the
mathematical relationships in the human body, and the usefulness of this
data for archeologists and forensic scientists.
Students achieved success not only in their highly reflective student
work but also in their clear display of how much prior knowledge they
had on linearity—far more than any pretest would ever have shown.
The Vitruvian Man activity also provided a springboard from which stu
dents could bounce new ideas and concepts off a variety of contexts that
FIgurE 5.7
Chocolate Algebra
Chocolate. Smooth, velvety, rich luscious chocolate. Algebra. Structured,
patterned, intensely functional algebra. Both can be equally dangerous
if certain precautions are not taken while consuming them. How could
anyone ever think to fuse together such a bittersweet relationship in such
a way to derive a deep synthesis in middle school mathematics? Art Hyde
(2006) cooked up this investigation, which consists of several problems,
“in order to fully integrate (synthesize) the different representations, data
FIgurE 5.8
Chocolate Algebra #1
Suppose I have $10 to spend, and I want to buy $1 Tootsie rolls
(Trs) and $2 Hershey’s bars (HBs). I have to use all of my money.
What combinations of chocolate goodies can I buy? Begin with
a kWC.
I had placed, next to the chocolate, a large blank sheet of chart paper
and a collection of play money in denominations of $1, $2, and $5. “We
get to use that chocolate and that money today!” I exclaimed as I circu
lated around the room handing out the problem.
My sixth graders immediately began working in small groups on
the KWC. Within moments, many students were furiously raising their
hands to write parts of their KWC on the board. See Figure 5.9.
Show Me the Money Once I’d established the context, constraints,
and question of the Chocolate Algebra problem, I distributed a bag of
play money to each group. For this first problem, each group received a
bundle of $1 bills and $2 bills. I made sure that each group had more than
enough bills to be able to visualize as many different combinations as pos
sible. Also, I knew that because my students had successfully completed
the KWC that they knew each $1 bill represented a TR and each $2 bill
represented an HB. I said to my students, “Show me the money! Hold up
an example of a possible purchase that I could make.” After about thirty
seconds, each group held up a possible purchase.
I stopped at each group, announced what I saw they held for money,
and asked the rest of the class to verify if it was a valid purchase. I noticed
that not one group held up an amount that was either less than or greater
than $10—all groups had paid close attention to the special condition
FIgurE 5.9
listed in their KWC. I also noticed that one group held up ten dollars,
but only in $1 bills.
As I approached this group, I asked the class to verify if it were pos
sible to not purchase any HBs. One boy said, “Just look at the KWC. It
just says that we have to spend all of our money—it doesn’t say how!”
“So is it okay to assume that I’m allowed to purchase zero HBs?” I
responded.
A student from the ten $1 bills group said, “Of course. Well, we don’t
know for sure if it’s not okay to do that, so let’s add this comment to our
‘C’ and then we can all agree that it’s okay.” I nodded in approval and then
sent her immediately up to the board to add her insightful comment to
the KWC.
Once the girl returned to her seat, I asked the class, “Are the ex
amples you’re holding up all of the possibilities?”
“No way!” students replied in unison. “How do you know?” I asked,
with a curious look on my face. One boy replied, “If it’s possible to have
zero HBs and stick to the problem’s rules, then it’s possible to have zero
TRs too! So there’s at least one more for ya!” I nodded in approval.
Tabular Representations I then asked “How can we keep track of all this
information in such a way that helps us be sure that we have found all
possible cases?” I suddenly heard a groan from a boy who rarely speaks
up in class, “Oh gosh, it’s one of your favorites again—isn’t it?” he said,
rolling his eyes.
“One of my favorite whats?”
Another child from his group joined in and said, “A table!” I eager
ly praised their predictions and approved the table strategy. Before I set
them off in their small groups to work on the table, I wanted to make sure
that they all knew how to construct the table around the data they were
FIgurE 5.10
collecting. Because this group had been accustomed to working with or
ganizing information for a table, they knew from looking back at their K
and W from the KWC that each candy bar type and cost, as well as the
total amount of money to spend, had to be represented in their tables. As
a large group, we sketched on chart paper the outline for their first table
in Chocolate Algebra. See Figure 5.10.
When Art first created this activity, he was working with an intel-
lectually heterogeneous group of third graders. He wanted to help
them focus on the relationship between the two variables in the
cells of the T-table while still keeping track of the cost. rather
than have these third graders remember or recalculate the costs of
buying that many of each item at its stated price, Art started using
a box in the upper right hand corner of each cell for the students
to enter the cost of those items. (This is like adding two more col-
umns, but students have difficulties dealing with the over load of
four columns.) (See Figure 5.10.) The box in the corner can be
easily made with a computer. Some teachers favor a circle, half or
5 3
x y
“One more question before you work,” I said to the class. “How can
you be sure that you satisfy the special conditions in your table?” Several
students piped up, “Because the rows in your tables should always sum to
exactly ten!” I nodded in approval and sent the students off on their way
to construct the table for Chocolate Algebra #1.
After several minutes of the groups working, I pulled the class back
together to record their data on chart paper. Again, before I recorded each
possibility, I asked the class to verify the accuracy by holding up the dol
lar amounts to make sure that we did indeed satisfy our special condition.
Also, I recorded their data in no apparent order, because I planned on
discussing the importance of order in the next several moments—and, to
my surprise, it was the students who brought it up!
Chocolate Algebra #2
At the end of class, I decided to take the time to distribute and discuss with
students their evening’s homework assignment, which was to complete
Chocolate Algebra #2, including a KWC and a detailed list of observa
tions made from their tables.
Chocolate Algebra #2
Suppose I have $20 to spend and I want to buy $1 Tootsie rolls
(Trs) and $2 Hershey’s bars (HBs). I have to use all of my money.
What combinations of chocolate goodies can I buy? Begin with
a kWC and be sure to include any patterns you observe from
your tables.
FIgurE 5.11
After five minutes, I noticed most of the class had completed their
sponge and had already begun to debrief last night’s homework in their
small groups, so I opened up the floor for a whole-class discussion to
share their answers to the sponge. For the first question, most students
agreed that the KWCs were very similar and the way in which they con
structed their tables for both problems had striking resemblances. See
Figure 5.12.
FIgurE 5.12
FIgurE 5.13a
FIgurE 5.13b
FIgurE 5.14a
FIgurE 5.14b
bound to pop up here somewhere.” To me, that meant they were using a
critical mathematical eye to connect prior knowledge to new understand
ings. To them, that meant they were clever and working in a time-effective
manner. Either way, I was impressed! In groups, the students used the
remainder of the class period to find all possible combinations for each
problem in this third round of Chocolate Algebra. See Figures 5.14a–d.
On the next day of class, I greeted my students at the door with a
slip of paper for their daily sponge and a graphing calculator. They’ve
been using graphing calculators in class since January and can use its
basic functions (computing, listing, and graphing equations using the y
= function with a known equation and stat plots and using the data from
lists students input without a known equation). The sponge for this class
period was for students to enter their data from yesterday’s investigation
into a list on their calculators. I asked students to place each data set in
a specific order so that we would all be on the same page as I checked
for their comprehension. Once I concluded that everyone was ready, I
plugged in my overhead calculator and walked the students through the
steps for creating a graph using the stat plot function from the data they
input into their lists (L1 through L6).
The students quickly seemed to pick up on the fact that all three lines
not only had the same stair steps but also did not intersect. I said, “When
the slope or rate of change (a fancy name for stair steps) are the same
among different data sets, the lines they form in their graphs will always
either fall directly on top of one another if they are the same line, or, like
FIgurE 5.14d
While the students were debriefing in their small groups, this gave me
the perfect opportunity to rotate around the room to see what they came
up with last night. I was impressed not only by their insights and obser
vations but also by their ability to connect past math language to newly
acquired math language. To me, it sounded as though a group of dis
tinguished mathematicians were having a deep discussion about linear
Diophantine equations! See Figure 5.15.
Before moving on, I did compile their responses on large chart paper in
an effort to generalize the patterns they were seeing in Chocolate Algebra.
The generalizations that my students were able to make were not made
overnight. In fact, they were not made after just one or two class periods.
For this entire activity, I spent a total of two and a half weeks on eight
Chocolate Algebra investigations. Only after the first five, which took a
little less than two weeks of having my students naturally go through cycles
of reconceptualization (for example, going back to any of the previous in
vestigations to establish and prove accuracy of their patterning), was I con
fident that every student fully understood that how the candy bar numbers
and prices fluctuated could help them fill in any Chocolate Algebra table
and how to build expressions using the total bubbles in their tables—which
would eventually assist with equation building.
FIgurE 5.15
Chocolate Algebra #7 4x + 2y = 40
Chocolate Algebra #8 3x + 6y = 30
What was different about #7 and #8 was not only the type of chocolate
used—Butterfingers (Bs) and Oreos (Os) for #7 and Crunch Bars (CBs)
and Peanut Butter Cups (PBs) for #8—but this time I prompted them with
specific questions about the equations and intercepts. See Figure 5.16.
The students used the remainder of the class period to work on the
new Chocolate Algebra problems and I instructed them to finish any left
overs for homework that night.
During our next class, after we debriefed Chocolate Algebra #7 and #8,
the last task for the students to complete was to neatly organize all of their
compiled Chocolate Algebra data that had accumulated inside their group
folders. In addition to giving students specific organization instructions to
demonstrate their newly pulled-together, or synthesized, understanding of
linear modeling, I had each of them respond to the following prompt:
I reminded them that it was very important that they not leave out
the word THAT in their responses because doing so would not enable
them to fully express their new found understandings and appreciations
of linear modeling. As a result, I did receive rather detailed and insightful
responses. See Figure 5.17.
FIgurE 5.17
Several moments passed and as the bell rang I noticed that most of my
students were quickly writing down or roughly sketching pictures of
tables, graphs, and functions. When the five minutes were up, I opened
a whole-class discussion about their responses. As I predicted, most of
the students suggested tables, graphs, and equations, but what was most
interesting were their responses to the second question. One girl said,
“Tables, graphs, and equations all represent the same relationship, they
are just different pictures of the same data.” Another boy stated, “I liked
the tables the best for figuring out the patterns and equations, but I liked
After students shared their responses to the KWC (see Figure 5.18),
I prompted them with the following question: “How would you set up a
table to collect data?” This question was important for several reasons.
First, I knew that once they figured out how the table should be organized,
they could access their prior knowledge and use their patterning and in
sight to quickly complete the table. Second, because this problem involved
two different variables, each with two different constraints—which added
another dimension to the linear combinations problem-solving process—I
knew it would be an excellent opportunity for them to construct the table
themselves based on the information they had. I would argue that there
have been many times that just setting up the table itself to organize data
can be a daunting task, which is precisely why I did not want to rob my
students of this authentic learning opportunity to use their KWCs by giv
ing them a teacher-created table.
Immediately, hands shot up to answer my prompt. One girl stated,
“Well we don’t know how many dressers of each type we have total, be
cause that’s what we are trying to find out. This thing that we don’t know
FIgurE 5.18
[the number of each type of dresser] is our variable and that means it’s like
the number of candy bars that changed a lot in chocolate algebra.”
I knew she was on to something, but I demanded more: “What do you
mean that it’s like the number of candy bars?”
Another student interrupted, “We’re gonna pick values of big dressers
(B) and small dressers (S) and play around with their number of large brass
handles and small brass knobs.”
I responded, “This seems like a little more going here than what we
did in chocolate algebra.” The students agreed, but before I gave in to the
desire to just give them the table with the proper headings, I decided to let
them work in small groups for about five minutes to generate an effective
way to organize their data.
To my surprise, several students dissected the problem deeply and cre
ated four individual tables. I asked them how would they ensure that the
large brass handles always totaled 120 and the small brass knobs always
totaled 132; the students responded that they would just keep totaling the
B large brass handles and the S large brass handles to make sure they were
120 and then total the B small brass knobs and S small brass knobs to make
sure they were 132. I nodded in approval, but I wanted to simplify this task
for them. I positively acknowledged their insight and willingness to work,
but I also asked if there was any way to condense the four tables into two.
One student spoke up, “Yeah, just a table for large brass handles with Bs
and Ss that always gotta equal one twenty, and then another table for small
brass knobs with Bs and Ss too that always gotta equal one thirty-two.” I
Big dresser (B) 8 Small dresser (S) 4 Big dresser (B) 4 Small dresser (S) 6
The tables were equipped with empty total bubbles for students to
fill in using what they read from the original problem. Because these stu
dents had successfully worked through two weeks of Chocolate Algebra,
they were ready to work with the empty total bubbles. As I circulated, I
noticed that many students quickly recognized the similar mathematical
structure in this problem as they had seen in Chocolate Algebra. This
was especially key for me to see and hear them make this math-to-math
connection because the connection enabled them to use shortcuts while
completing the tables. See Figure 5.19.
FIgurE 5.19
Look at the tables you finished yesterday. Why are there two
tables in this investigation and only one table in Chocolate Alge-
bra? I thought they were the same!
FIgurE 5.20a
FIgurE 5.20b
FIgurE 5.20c
The first thing I had my students do was visualize these crazy shirts.
There was a lot of information for them to digest. Before they proceeded to
sink their teeth into this problem I wanted them to draw a picture of what
they thought the shirts looked like. I did not have the luxury of owning such
apparel, so to help my students sketch their pictures, I brought in a few of
my husband’s work shirts. See Figure 5.21. My students completed a KWC
while reading through the problem in small groups. See Figure 5.22.
FIgurE 5.21
FIgurE 5.22
FIgurE 5.23
$5 $2
8 0
6 5
4 10
2 15
0 20
FIgurE 5.24
5x + 2y = 40
2y = –5x + 40
y = (–5/2) x +20
Total $40
Difference Difference
$5 item $2 item
–2 8 0 5
–2 6 5 5
–2 4 10 5
–2 2 15 5
0 20
FIgurE 5.25
Quadratic Equations
Next we move to quadratic equations using a version of the handshake
problem.
1 0
2 1
3 3
4 6
5 10
FIgurE 5.26
1 0 1
2 1 2
3 3 3
4 6 4
5 10
FIgurE 5.27
The students can see a pattern now and it makes sense, but they are
not finished because the numbers in ∆1 are not constant. It is not a linear
relationship. They must look at the second difference, the difference be
tween connective data in the first column. See Figure 5.28.
1 0 1 1
2 1 2 1
3 3 3 1
4 6 4
5 10
FIgurE 5.28
Now everyone can see the constant difference in ∆2, which means
the function is quadratic. How do we figure out what that quadratic equa
tion is? We take the function form of a quadratic y = ax2 + bx + c, we use
it to develop a general procedure that will always work, and we substitute
consecutive values of x. See Figure 5.29.
x y
0 c
1 a+b+c
2 4a + 2b + c
3 9a + 3b + c
4 16a + 4b + c
FIgurE 5.29
0 c a+b 2a
1 a+b+c 3a + b 2a
2 4a + 2b + c 5a + b 2a
3 9a + 3b + c 7a + b
4 16a + 4b + c
FIgurE 5.30
When students are ready to expand the table to derive the values of
the first difference, all we need to do is ask, “What would you have to
combine with c to get a + b + c? Or, what is the difference between c and
a + b + c?” Students would continue finding the first difference because
they will need at least five examples to get three constant differences, as
suming they’re dealing with a quadratic.
Next, we derive the second difference in the same manner:
• When x is 0, then the value of y is equal to c.
• The constant second difference is equal to 2a.
• When x is 0, then the value of ∆1 is equal to a + b.
For our High Fives All Around problem, students must take the table
shown in Figure 5.28 and fill in the row when x = 0. See Figure 5.31.
0 0 0 1⇐
1 0 1 1
2 1 2 1
3 3 3 1
4 6 4
5 10
FIgurE 5.31
The Supremes
When the nine u.S. Supreme Court Justices meet for a session,
each justice shakes the hand of all eight other justices. How many
handshakes take place?
# of Cumulative
Justices Handshakes Δ1 Δ2
1 0 1 1
2 1 2 1
3 3 3 1
4 6 4 1
5 10 5 1
6 15 6 1
7 21 7 1
8 28 8
9 36
FIgurE 5.32
When the students create the table for the above problem, they get a
slightly different table from the Supremes problem table. See Figure 5.33.
0 0 1 1
1 1 2 1
2 3 3 1
3 6 4 1
4 10 5 1
5 15 6 1
6 21 7 1
7 28 8 1
8 36 9
9 45
FIgurE 5.33
The difference is the first justice who enters the courtroom with no
one there yet to shake his hand. Therefore y = 0 in row 1. But in the stack
of boxes, the first (top) row has 1 box , so y = 1 in row 1. Using the finite
difference values as before, students fill in row 0; they get: c = 0, 2a = 1,
a = ½, and a + b = 1, therefore b = ½. The equation for this problem becomes
y = ½x2 + ½x = ½x(x + 1) = x(x + 1)/2, which differs from the equation in the
Supremes problem by just one little sign that makes a big difference!
-4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4
-1
FIgurE 5.34
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4
-1
FIgurE 5.35
Cubic Equations
Next, we follow the same line of reasoning with cubic equations. Figure
5.36 shows the cubic equation:
x y
0 d
1 a+b+c+d
2 8a + 4b + 2c + d
3 27a + 9b + 3c + d
4 64a + 16b + 4c + d
5 125a + 25b + 5c + d
FIgurE 5.36
CUBIC
y = ax3 + bx2 + cx + d
EQUATIoN
x y Δ1 Δ2 Δ3
0 d a+b+c 6a + 2b 6a
1 a+b+c+d 7a + 3b + c 12a + 2b 6a
2 8a + 4b + 2c + d 19a + 5b + c 18a + 2b 6a
5 125a + 25b + 5c + d
FIgurE 5.37
FIgurE 5.38
One square in each corner is cut out to allow the four sides to be
folded up to make a box with a 13-by-13-inch base, a 1-inch height, and
capacity to hold 169 1-inch cubes of chocolate. (The box on page 177
does not have a lid, although it would probably make a good one.)
A 2-by-2-inch square cut from a 15-by-15-inch sheet of paper pro
duces an 11-by-11-inch base with 2 layers (a capacity of 242 cubes or
cubic inches). See Figure 5.38.
If we continued cutting a square from each corner in this manner,
3-by-3, 4-by-4, etc., which box would hold the most chocolate cubes?
The students’ work on the data table produced some surprises. See Fig
ure 5.39.
0 0 169 –96 24
1 169 73 –72 24
2 242 1 –48 24
6 54 –47
7 7
FIgurE 5.39
Students can now enter the equation y = 4x3 – 60x2 + 225x into their
graphing calculators and set the increase on the x variable to .1 so that
they can find the maximum y value. When they do, they’ll then find that
at x = 2.5, y = 250.
Some teachers may decide to go even further by having their students
play around with the graphing function on their calculators. Again, there
are several routes to take. Students could graph the data they’ve collected;
however, the concern would be that they would see only a portion of
the graph and possibly assume that a cubic equation creates a parabola,
similar to quadratic equations. See Figure 5.40 for a spreadsheet program
showing a virtual plateau between 242 and 243, where students could
easily assume a cubic looked like a quadratic.
See Figure 5.41 for a graph of the function for quadrant I with posi
tive values for both x and y. The graph nicely shows the curve rising
above 242 and 243, up to 250 at x = 2.5. However, students could still be
confused about what the cubic function looks like.
Students could also play with the zoom function to see the whole
graph. The advantages are that students can see what a typical cubic
equation looks like when graphed (the right tail shoots up to y values in
the 2000s quite fast!) and they can understand which values on the graph
are meaningful and work realistically with respect to the context of the
problem and which values on the graph only work mathematically. Again,
this creates a great opportunity to discuss why endpoints are necessary on
some graphs. Figure 5.42 shows a bigger picture of the function, where
the seemingly parabolic curve shown in Figure 5.41 is actually just a little
characteristic “bump” in the cubic function, which goes from infinitely
negative x and y to infinitely positive x and y.
300
250
200
volume
150
100
50
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
FIgurE 5.40
300
250
200
volume
150
100
50
3 2
y = 4x - 60x + 225x - 7E-11
2
R =1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
FIgurE 5.41
FIgurE 5.42
CONCluSION
green
equilateral orange
yellow triangle square
hexagon
This problem initially may appear simple. There are many relation
ships among these shapes of which kids are very much aware, from making
shapes with them in earlier grades. They’d know that two green equilateral
triangles can be put together to be the same shape and size (they are con
gruent) with the blue rhombus. Similarly, three of the equilateral triangles
can be congruent with the red trapezoid. Two red trapezoids can be made
congruent with the yellow hexagon. See Figures 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4.
Students immediately pull out the equilateral triangle, blue rhombus,
red trapezoid, and yellow hexagon to show their order from smallest to
largest. Ask them to explain their reasoning and they will tell you some
of the size relationships like the ones I just mentioned. There are a dozen
size relationships based on building up the large pieces from the smaller
ones (for example, six triangles can make a hexagon). I do prefer that the
students move toward more mathematically accurate and precise termi
nology, but I am not going to drive them crazy with it either. For instance,
I would model for them, “Six equilateral triangles with a side length of
FIgurE 6.2
FIgurE 6.3
FIgurE 6.4
one inch can be made congruent to a regular hexagon that also has side
length of one inch.”
They easily discern the order of the four shapes that are based
on multiples of the equilateral triangle. I suggest to the students that the
equilateral triangle is the basic building block of this family (Figure 6.5).
But what about the square and the tan rhombus in Figure 6.6?
They start thinking of ways to compare two shapes, but I want to see a
technique so I suggest, “Try comparing the square and the red trapezoid.”
On the overhead projector I place reds and oranges as in Figure 6.7.
I use the term overhang to get their focus on the “extra” red trapezoid
that goes beyond the square on the left and the extra part of the orange
square that goes over the top of the red trapezoid. I ask, “Which is greater,
the red overhang (which is two right triangles) or the orange overhang
(the thin rectangle)?” The red overhang is the unanimous winner. The
trapezoid is bigger than the square.
FIgurE 6.5
orange tan
FIgurE 6.6
orange
red
FIgurE 6.7
Frequently students will assert that the square and the blue rhombus
are the same size. I ask, “What is it about these shapes that leads you to
this conclusion?” “They look about the same size.” I tell them that we’re
going to need more evidence than that. There is usually a lot of hemming
and hawing, but eventually (although it occasionally comes quickly)
someone says that they have the same perimeter. A key moment!
I turn to the class and say, “We have an interesting thesis being of
fered here. On the basis of your extensive work with geometric shapes in
your life, would you infer that shapes that have the same perimeter also
have the same area? Is that a pattern you have seen before now?” I want
to assure you, there is no trace whatsoever of sarcasm in my voice. The
students who have offered this idea are thinking. They have taken some
risk. I want to make sure they know that making mistakes is a natural part
tan blue
FIgurE 6.20
FIgurE 6.21
orange
tan
blue
FIgurE 6.24
TABLE oF MULTIPLES
Square Tan Rhombus Hexagon Trapezoid Blue Rhombus Triangle
1 0.5 2.589 1.299 0.866 0.433
2 1 5.178 2.598 1.732 0.866
3 1.5 7.767 3.897 2.598 1.299
4 2 10.356 5.196 3.464 1.732
5 2.5 12.945 6.495 4.33 2.165
6 3 15.534 7.794 5.196 2.598
FIgurE 6.25
AREA
TANS & 0.5 GREEN 0.433 10.428
SQUARES FAMILY
10 0.428 no
20
9 1.428
18 3.297921478 no
7.5 2.928 no
15 6.762124711
2.634 7.794
18 no
0.902 9.526
22 no
AREA
1 TAN 0.5 3.5
SQUARES RHoMBUS
3 0.5
3 1
2 1.5
2 3
1 2.5
1 5
3.5
0 7
Of course there are many more than four options with the green family.
And their are multiple solutions. Figure 6.26 gives one.
FIgurE 6.26
FIgurE 6.27
Does a pattern begin to emerge? Let’s add two more examples (Figures
6.30 and 6.31) and set up a table like we do for Chocolate Algebra.
6 3.464 1.732
12 4 4
4 2 2.598 1.732 0.866
8 2 2 2 2
The pattern is: 6 square inches of area come from the small rhombi
and square; 5.196 square inches of area come from the equilateral triangle
family.
FIgurE 6.32
FIgurE 6.33
ensuring that they don’t mix angles (for example, rhombus two acute
and two obtuse). If they do, it gives you an opportunity to help them
see a key attribute of rhombuses and all parallelograms: adjacent angles
are supplementary (they sum to 180°). All of this sliding up can be done
fairly quickly and kids record what they find. See Figure 6.33.
Now we return to the paper versions of the shapes and I tell them a
little story.
Some history of mathematics books will tell you that the Babylo
nians started all this—they had a number system that was based on sixty,
not ten. They loved sixty and multiples of sixty (120, 180, 240, 300,
360, and so on). They thought of a year as 360 days and threw in some
special feast days. They looked at the stars in the sky and divided the sky
up into the signs of the zodiac (constellations). And they used their love
of sixty to do so. They imagined that there was a great circle all around
the earth, and they cut the sky into twelve zodiac signs and into 360
chunks coming from the 360 days in the year. The twelve signs each had
thirty chunks and each of the 360 chunks became a degree. Therefore it
takes 360 degrees to go all around a point in the center of a circle. I have
photocopied a circular protractor so students can see all 360 degrees.
(See www.braidedmath.com for a larger version of the protractor.) See
Figure 6.34.
Notice the single degree on this protractor. Students need to see and
feel the units of measure they are supposed to use. Do you have a good
feel for 1 liquid ounce? For a foot? For a meter? For a pound?
If the protractor is 360° all the way around a point, and it took 4
squares, they each must take up 90 of those chunks. And six equilateral
triangles each must take up 60 of those degrees. We ask the students to
take their paper one decimeter pattern blocks and slide one vertex up to
the point and mark where its sides cross the protractors hash marks. Check
to see if the square takes up 90 of those chunks. The students should in
this way measure each of the paper angles and connect the measures to the
number of that angle it took to encircle the dot in Figure 6.28.
FIgurE 6.34
The Babylonians put all this into play about four thousand years ago.
Why do we still have this system? Why did the Egyptians, the Greeks,
the Romans, and so on keep it? Why didn’t somebody go to one hundred
clicks around a circle (essentially the metric system)? I think I know why.
Most of these people talked about fractions as “a fifth part” or a “fourth
part” so if you had 100 degrees in a circle, then halfway around (a half
part) would be 50 degrees. Okay, but a third of the way around (a third
part) would be a messy 33.33333. Now let’s try parts of 360:
• A half of 360 is 180.
• A third of 360 is 120.
• A fourth of 360 is 90.
• A fifth of 360 is 72.
• A sixth of 360 is 60.
• A seventh is not even.
• An eighth of 360 is 45.
• A ninth of 360 is 40.
• A tenth of 360 is 36.
• An eleventh is not even.
• A twelfth of 360 is 30.
So 360 is the smallest number that is evenly divisible by every number from
2 to 12, except 7 and 11—which is why there are no 7-11s in Babylon.
FIgurE 6.35
FIgurE 6.36
Then I ask:
• How would you describe the seed [in Figure 6.36]?
• What is happening at the common vertex?
• Can this seed be repeated? Infinitely?
• If you have some pattern blocks handy, try to answers these ques
tions empirically, concretely.
You might say the common vertex contains one of each of the four
angles. You might add that the acute angle of each rhombus is opposite
its obtuse angle. You also might say that if we listed the angles clockwise
from about one o’clock, we’d have 120°, 150°, 60°, 30°. This seed can be
repeated indefinitely. See Figure 6.37.
FIgurE 6.37
How many different seeds are possible with these two shapes?
Begin with a kWC.
With a good KWC and a lively discussion in small groups and then the
whole class, they usually recognize this is a combinations problem: What
are the combinations of 30, 60, 120, and 150 that will make 360? And
there are four critical questions I ask them:
1. How many ways have you found?
2. Did you check for duplicates?
3. Have you found them all?
4. And the most important question: How do you know when you
have found them all?
Everyone agrees to try the kind of table they’ve done on prior prob
lems. They start out recording the seed in Figure 6.36 with four rhombi,
two of each, with the common vertex having one of each angle. See Fig
ure 6.38. Rarely does anyone in the class realize that there is more here
than meets the eye.
TAN BLUE BLUE TAN
150° 120° 60° 30°
1 1 1 1
FIgurE 6.38
In Figure 6.39, we can see what most of the small groups have done.
They would likely proceed on through finding all twenty-four rows for
this table. However, when they have about a dozen of each rhombus and
make the arrangement, they discover that there is often more than one
way to arrange the numerical solutions. If they simply create the table by
working the numbers, they might miss the many possibilities.
TAN BLUE BLUE TAN
150° 120° 60° 30°
A
2 0 1 0
B
2 0 0 2
C
1 1 1 1
D
1 1 0 3
E
1 0 3 1
F
1 0 2 3
G
1 0 1 5
FIgurE 6.39
FIgurE 6.40
Math
A 2 0 1 0 1
B 2 0 0 2 2
C 1 1 1 1 3
D 1 1 0 3 2
E 1 0 3 1 2
F 1 0 2 3 6
G 1 0 1 5 3
H 1 0 0 7 1
I 0 3 0 0 1
J 0 2 2 0 2
K 0 2 1 2 5
L 0 2 0 4 3
M 0 1 4 0 1
N 0 1 3 2 6
o 0 1 2 4 9
P 0 1 1 6 4
Q 0 1 0 8 1
R 0 0 6 0 1
S 0 0 5 2 3
T 0 0 4 4 8
U 0 0 3 6 7
V 0 0 2 8 5
W 0 0 1 10 1
X 0 0 0 12 1
78
FIgurE 6.43
FIgurE 6.44
Extension
I give the students a tessellation (see Figure 6.44) and ask them a series
of questions:
1. What shapes do you see that are made up of a bunch of poly
gons? The two most likely are different balls; actually they are
two-dimensional decagons and a five-pointed star fish.
2. There are two rhombi in this tessellation. What are their angles?
How do you know?
3. Give a numerical analysis for these two rhombi of all the pos
sible seeds or angles at a common vertex. Which are present in
this tessellation and which are not?
The answer to question 2 is given below and the answer to question 3 is
given in Figure 6.45.
The tessellation in Figure 6.44 is an example of tiling with Penrose
Tiles. Created by Sir Roger Penrose in the 1980s, these two rhombi (72,
FIgurE 6.45
The sum of the squares of the lengths of the two legs of a right
triangle are equal to the square of the hypotenuse.
FIgurE 6.50b
Next, I gave them a small square and asked them to combine the
small square (see Figure 6.49) with the four quadrilaterals to make an
other square. This square proved to be even more difficult than the first
one. See Figure 6.50a.
Next, I gave students a right triangle and three squares that were
congruent with Figures 6.48, 6.49, and 6.50a. See Figure 6.50b.
I asked them to arrange three squares flat against the triangle so
matching sides (congruent) were stuck together. See Figure 6.50c.
In the debriefing portion of this activity, I asked the students to
write in their math journals what was unusual about all these shapes.
They got together in small groups and shared ideas. I asked another
open-ended question:
The students were able to see that the big square could be made by
dissecting the middle square and adding it to the small square.
The set of shapes discussed above illustrated the Pythagorean Theo
rem; we should encourage tactile and visual experiences with shapes to
help our students grasp the relationships. However, this was just the start
of our exploration—next I gave students a sheet of square centimeter
graph paper glued to oak tag (I reuse old file folders). I asked them to cut
out a right triangle that had the 90-degree angle between the two smaller
sides, six and eight centimeters. Then they were to cut out three squares:
(6 × 6) (8 × 8) (10 × 10).
I asked students to fit the squares around the right triangle, side
to side. I hadn’t yet said anything about the length of the long side (the
hypotenuse—or hippopotamoose, if you prefer). As they slid the squares
up alongside the triangle, many students caught on and saw that the two
shorter sides (6 and 8) had areas of 36 and 64 and were equal in area to
the 10-by-10 square. The symbolic representation for this would be 62 +
82 = 102.
I used to be surprised that my students had no idea where the term
squaring a number originated. The terms, as well as their meaning, had
never been connected—squaring, raising to the second power, perfect square,
square numbers, an exponent of 2, completing the square are all connected.
Therefore, for the sake of simplicity, I will refer to the three squares as
c/2 c c/2
d d
b-x d a
a
d a
a
x b-x
Misconception
most students think that the basic principle behind the Pythagorean
Theorem applies only to squares because that is the only shape
they’ve ever seen associated with the theorem. Also, the equation
is all about squaring: a2 + b2 = c2. But when you raise something
to the second power, you multiply two numbers together—recall
the partial products. This can be conceived of as area. In fact, the
theorem of Pythagoras applies to any set of similar shapes.
1
7
8 7
FIgurE 6.55
FIgurE 6.56
m n a b c
2 1 3 4 5
4 1 15 8 17
6 1 35 12 37
8 1 63 16 65
3 2 5 12 13
5 2 21 20 29
7 2 45 28 53
9 2 77 36 85
4 3 7 24 25
8 3 55 48 73
7 4 33 56 65
7 6 13 84 85
9 4 65 72 97
6 5 11 60 61
5 4 9 40 41
8 5 39 80 89
FIgurE 6.57
The class did a KWC and some focused their attention on how the
newspaper actually calculated the 1,725 pounds of snow. They multiplied
25 feet by 10 feet, which would be the surface area of the driveway, or
250 square feet. But then the instructions say to multiply by the height
of the snow in inches. “Why not feet?” I asked. Then we’d know the
volume of the snow one foot deep would give us 250 cubic feet of snow.
Long pause. One student offered an interesting idea, “Maybe it didn’t drop
twelve inches of snow everywhere. Maybe this is some kind of general
formula for what happens usually, like three or four inches.” So we took
the 250 square feet for the surface area of the driveway and multiplied it
by 12 inches and got 3000. But 3000 what? We should be getting the vol
ume of the snow. If we had used one foot for height of the snow our three
measures would all be in feet and we’d have a volume of 250 cubic feet.
The newspaper says this would weigh 1,725 pounds. How much would
one cubic foot weigh? 1725 ÷ 250 = 6.9, which means that the snow was
the heavy wet kind. But the newspaper’s general formula doesn’t mention
pounds. It just says multiply by .575. At this point several students real
ized that the 6.9 pounds must somehow be built into the .575, so that
.575 is (6.9x). Okay! So 6.9x = .575 then x = .575/6.9 = .08333—which is
1/12, so that inches get changed into feet.
Light, fluffy snow weighs 3.1 pounds and heavy, wet snow weighs
6.9 pounds because of the higher water content. Snow is mostly
air, so a little water can make a big difference. What does a cubic
foot of water weigh? Begin with a kWC.
A lot of info is already on the board from the previous KWC, but this
is a new question and maybe some new knowledge needs to appear. And
any time there is a new problem, there will be new constraints or condi
tions. I bring out the cubic foot again, and the only other scaffolding I do
early is to remind students that we have a volume measure and weight (or
mass) measure. How can we establish a relation between them?
The students start brainstorming math-to-world connections. That
cubic foot looks smaller than the big water jugs carted in to office build
ings. When we buy gas for our lawn mower, we fill up a five-gallon gas
can, it is pretty heavy. How many gallons would be in a cubic foot? Here
I intervene and I ask, “How would that help you?”
Several chime in. If we knew how many gallons in a cubic foot, then
we’d only need to know what a gallon of water weighs. Could we just weigh
a gallon of water? But then we still wouldn’t know how many gallons in a
cubic foot. I intervene again, and remind them that they are still dealing
with relating volume to weight. The customary English system does not
advertise this relationship, but there is one and I’ll explain it shortly.
The metric system does show how to equate attributes very well. For
instance, the most familiar measures they might know are:
Length: centimeters, meters
Area: square centimeter, square meter
Volume: cubic centimeter (cm3), cubic meter
Capacity: milliliter (mL), liter (L)
Mass: gram, kilogram
The most curious and wonderful feature for me is the relationship
that 1 cm3 = 1 mL and 1 cm3 of water has a mass of 1 gram. It does not take
long for some of the students to realize how they could use this info to
help them with the current problem. They see that they are starting with
a cubic foot, a volume measure that if converted to metric volume can be
easily equated with both metric capacity and metric mass. Then to get an
answer in pounds, they’d have to convert from metric mass to pounds.
So I pull out the cardboard cubic foot and they think about how to
convert this to metric. I give each table a pile of base ten blocks (ten sticks,
one hundred squares, and one thousand cubes). The students try to get
a feel for how these manipulatives could measure the cubic foot. Each of
CONCluSION
This chapter has examined the connections between geometry and mea
surement, algebra and geometry, number properties and geometry concepts.
The activities are sufficiently rich that they could be modified for any grade
in middle school or junior high, essentially fifth through eighth grades.
Any time students work on a probability experiment, they have the op
portunity to learn or practice significant computation with data. In this
chapter we create authentic environments for our students to use multiple
data analysis and probability representations, in a variety of contexts, to
inspire our students to build meaningful connections and models. In the
first four problems, Chevalier de Mere’s Game of Chance, Probability Bags,
A Plethora of Pigs, and Montana Red Dog, we explore different aspects of
experimental probability. In the last set of story problems, Combination
Pizzas and Permutation Locks, Product Versus Square, Montana Red Dog
Follow-Up, and De Mere’s Bets Follow-Up, we examine possible outcomes,
which is critically important in understanding theoretical probability.
Extension
Propose an advanced thinking question: How different in either direction
from 50 percent wins would there have to be for students to believe the
game was not fair?
DATA PREDICTIoN
GRoUP R Y B R Y B
Z 6 4 15 >> 2 2 6
Y 7 2 16 >> 3 1 6
X 8 5 12 >> 3 2 5
W 6 6 13 >> 2 2 6
V 7 5 13 >> 3 2 5
U 7 4 14 >> 3 1 6
T 5 6 14 >> 2 2 6
S 9 5 11 >> 4 2 4
FIgurE 7.1
There were 15 blue (which is 15/25 or 3/5 or 60 percent). Red was 6/25,
so 6 divided by 25 is .24, or 24 percent, and 4/25 is 4 divided by 25, or
.16 or 16 percent. Then we took 60 percent of 10 and got 6 for blue,
24 percent of 10 is 2.4 red, which we rounded down to 2 red. And
we took 16 percent of 10 for yellow, which is 1.6 yellow. We rounded
that up to 2. So our prediction is 2 red, 2 yellow, and 6 blue.
Note that even with a good procedure, students still must use num
ber sense and round.
Somewhere during our discussion, a student will ask, “Can we col
lect more data?” or “Can we do it over again to see if we get the same
thing?” I seize the opportunity to engage the class in two conversations:
1. the law of large numbers, where increasing the samples will give
us a more stable statistics; and
2. a little workout with proportional reasoning.
I ask the class, “If your data today gave you fourteen out of twenty-
five blue, how many blues would you expect to get if you did it again
seventy-five times, so that you had a sample of one hundred?”
A couple of students blurt out, “fifty-six!”
“What reasoning brought you that insight?”
They fumble around trying to explain that “everything is four times
bigger”; I may have to summarize for them that if we can assume that, in
general, the balance or ratio of blue to the total will remain the same four
teen out of twenty-five times, then the three additional samples of twenty-
five (to get seventy-five more) will each have fourteen blues (maybe). I then
require each group to report on how they came up with their prediction.
One particular question typically always comes up during sampling:
“Are the contents of all eight bags the same?” Up until now I’ve deflected
the questions with “Let’s wait and see.” Now that we’re exploring the
groups’ sampling results, I ask them to look at the table of data they’ve
created (Figure 7.1). The class invariably is divided into three camps: The
largest group thinks the bags are all the same; the smallest group says
some are different; and in between are those who say, “We can’t tell. There
is no way to tell. You are playing a trick on us.”
I ask the class to look at the data for each color. “How spread out is
it?” They tell me that red goes from five to nine, yellow from two to six,
and blue from eleven to sixteen. “If the bags are all the same, why are
there differences among data?” They say things like, “chance,” “random,”
“they cheated.” I ask, “If one of the bags were different, but the other
seven the same, which would you think is the different one?” Students
nominate group S and group Y. I ask them to explain their reasoning.
They tell me that group S had the lowest blue (eleven) and the highest
red (nine). Group Y had the lowest yellow.
DATA
GRoUP R Y B
Z 6 4 15
Y 7 2 16
8 5 12
W 6 6 13
V 7 5 13
U 7 4 14
T 5 6 14
S 9 5 11
ToTAL 55 37 108
FIgurE 7.2
A Plethora of Pigs
About twenty years ago, I was looking for some fresh probability activi
ties, alternatives to the familiar dice and spinners. I encountered Pigma
nia, still marketed as Pass the Pigs, a clever game that consists of two
rubber pigs that are tossed like a pair of dice. The pigs are approximately
one inch long, half an inch high when standing on all four feet, and three-
eighths of an inch wide. See Figure 7.3.
In this game, students collect data on the outcomes from their tosses
of a single pig. The frequency data are used to estimate the probability of
the outcomes. We like that the six different outcomes of tossing a pig are
not equally likely and that the theoretical probabilities are unknown. In
FIgurE 7.3
FIgurE 7.4
Several hands shoot up and almost in unison they reply, “We’ve got to
take it to the lab!” (My students have gotten quite used to me saying this
in class whenever we need to collect data to draw conclusions.) I respond
excitedly, “To the lab we go!”
In the lab, which is just our usual classroom, except now I’m wearing
an old white lab coat for emphasis, we decide that we should toss our pig
lets to figure out which outcomes are easiest for them to land on. I have
each group toss their piglet fifty times and record how their piglets land
each time. I use fifty for several reasons: First, it’s a reasonable number
of trials to collect in about seven minutes of class time; second, fifty is a
great number with which students can easily use proportional reasoning
to predict what their data would look like in one hundred tosses, two
hundred tosses, and so on; and last, but not least, all of the results can
convert very nicely into fractions, percents, and decimals.
Once the students have generated their data, I record each team’s data
on large chart paper. See Figure 7.4.
After recording the data, we discuss as a class what that data implies
as a reasonable point value system for the game I wish to play with my
family. For homework that night, their job is to use mathematical evi
dence and sufficient support to respond to the following question:
What point value system would you assign to each outcome? Be sure
to explain your answer and support your reasoning with mathemati
cal evidence.
FIgurE 7.5
I turn over each of my ten dealer cards one at a time, and each group
that had a winning card holds it up. We can see that the dealer won 69 per
cent of the time. Only groups X, T, and S won five times by beating five of
the dealer’s ten cards. Once again I ask, “Do you think the game is fair?”
Analyzing a Hand
On the third or fourth deal, I ask the class, “Who has a good hand now? Show
us your cards.” One group thinks it does. They show the class and I ask:
• Is this a good hand?
• Why or why not?
• What makes a good hand?
This last question is key. Many students initially say “high cards,” so I
ask, “If turned up a two of clubs, who could beat me?” Typically six of
the ten groups could, to which I respond, “Do you mean four of your ten
groups cannot beat even the smallest club?” The students all begin to see
that this can definitely happen when the dealer’s card is from a suit they
do not have. I try to crystallize their understanding by explaining that
no matter how high the cards are, if they are missing a suit, right off the
bat they will not beat one-fourth of the cards I could have. They realize a
really good hand has high cards in all four suits.
Misconception
Students are focusing on individual hands and trials, and not
thinking about what happens in the long run—they need to ap-
preciate concepts such as the law of large numbers, sample size,
and “the long run.” I ask them about the spinner where three-
fourths of the face is red: “If I spun this four times, will it definitely
land on the red three of the four times?” Some say yes, some
say maybe, some say not necessarily. We can see the movement
across these three responses and a steady dwindling of the “yes”
response across grades 3, 4, 5, and 6.
A A A A
k k k k
Q Q Q Q
J J J J
10 10 10 10
9 9 9 9
8 8 8 8
7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6
5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2
Can Beat [11] [4] [0] [10] Total Can Beat [25]
FIgurE 7.6
Z Y X W V U T S R Q
Q♥10♥ 2♠ 5♥ J♥ 3♥ k♦ 9♦ A♣ k♣ 8♥ J♦ 10♣ J♠ A♠ 5♠ A♥ 4♥ 5♣ 3♠
7♥ 5♦ 3♦ 2♣ 6♦ Q♣ 3♣ 6♦ 2♦ 7♠ 4♣ 4♠ 10♠ 8♠ Q♦ 6♥ J♣ 7♣ 2♥ 10♦
wins 2 0 5 2 4 2 5 5 4 2
.200 .000 .500 .200 .400 .200 .500 .500 .400 .200
can beat 11 5 22 11 16 19 15 25 19
11 55 22 11 16 19 15 25 19 15
48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48
p= .229 .104 .458 .229 .333 .396 .313 .521 .396 .313
FIgurE 7.7
an advantage built into the game in the long run do not conceive of this
statistic in the long run.
The students learn quite a bit from analyzing their hands and looking
at who has good hands in the class. Figure 7.7 supplements what we saw
previously in Figure 7.5. At the top of the table in Figure 7.7 we can see
the four cards that each group had. The wins directly under the ten group
columns are the number of times out of ten that a particular group won.
The bottom two rows in Figure 7.7 give the number that each group can
beat, this number as the numerator of a fraction with denominator of 48,
this value as a decimal (you could readily use percent instead of decimal).
These statistics are the probability of winning that each group has.
The students who have an initial, reasonable interpretation of these
percents are quite surprised. I’d even say some are stunned. Their thresh
old understanding of the fraction and the decimal told them, “In the long
run, regardless of which particular cards the dealer has in any one game
(or many games), if you decided to keep this hand, that is the fraction or
decimal part the times that you would win.”
Only one of the ten groups—group S—had more than a .500 prob
ability of winning. Nine of the ten hands have less than .500 chance of
winning. Furthermore, even in one game (the short run), the probability
of winning is close to what actually happened. Each group compared the
number of wins they actually had as a decimal—wins divided by ten—to
their probability of winning. For instance, group S had a probability of
.521 and actually beat five out of ten, or .500, of the dealer’s cards. The
next highest probability was group X with .458, and they also won .500.
Only group T did much better than would have been predicted from ana
lyzing their hand (probability .313 versus actually won .500). 233
THEOrETICAl PrOBABIlITY
After students have completed the activities described so far in this chap
ter and built a foundation in probability, they can move toward more ab
stract representations and theoretical probability. Being able to determine
all the possible outcomes of a situation is valuable in life. The activities in
this section, Combination Pizzas and Permutation Locks, Product Versus
Square, Montana Red Dog Follow-Up, and De Mere’s Bets Follow-Up,
creatively develop that capability.
1. The members of the standing team pass the basket and hold it
down so that the sitting team can easily see into the basket and
select three colors.
2. No talking by the standing team is allowed.
3. The standing team player should look at the seated player’s hand
to see if the combination just chosen and spoken by a player is
in the hand of the sitting team player in front of her.
• Hold one constant and vary the other two in some order.
• Hold two constant and vary the third. In both cases the students
could keep the pattern going for ten or twelve combinations.
Blue Brown
Green Orange
FIgurE 7.8
This is the kind of math that scares children and small animals. But using
M&Ms in this activity provides a gentle way to help students understand
the symbols shown in the formulas.
First, the factorial symbol ! is an exclamation mark and I have been
known to tell students when they see it they may pronounce it “eeek!”
About the only places they’ll ever see that symbol is in combinatorics and
probability. I tell the students that mathematicians are always looking
for shortcuts—for example, if they had to multiply 9 * 9 * 9 * 9, they do
shorthand to go with their shortcuts and they write 94 instead. So, if they
had to multiply 1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * 5 or 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 they’d write 5! and
they’d say, “five factorial” (or “five eeek!”).
P 36 = 6! = 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1
3! 3*2*1
3! 6
Being able to flexibly move back and forth among these concepts
and their representations with understanding is essential to success in
theoretical probability.
red die
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1 2 3 4 5 6
2 2 4 6 8 10 12
3 3 6 9 12 15 18
white die
4 4 8 12 16 20 24
5 5 10 15 20 25 30
6 6 12 18 24 30 36
FIgurE 7.9
2 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 2 4 6 8 10 12
3 3 6 9 12 15 18 3 3 6 9 12 15 18
4 4 8 12 16 20 24 4 4 8 12 16 20 24
5 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 5 10 15 20 25 30
6 6 12 18 24 30 36 6 6 12 18 24 30 36
2 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 2 4 6 8 10 12
3 3 6 9 12 15 18 3 3 6 9 12 15 18
4 4 8 12 16 20 24 4 4 8 12 16 20 24
5 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 5 10 15 20 25 30
6 6 12 18 24 30 36 6 6 12 18 24 30 36
2 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 2 4 6 8 10 12
3 3 6 9 12 15 18 3 3 6 9 12 15 18
4 4 8 12 16 20 24 4 4 8 12 16 20 24
5 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 5 10 15 20 25 30
6 6 12 18 24 30 36 6 6 12 18 24 30 36
FIgurE 7.10
WINS 0 2 2 4 6 8 10 12 WINS 5 2 2 4 6 8 10 12
LOSES 35 LOSES 28
3 3 6 9 12 15 18 3 3 6 9 12 15 18
TIES 1 TIES 3
4 4 8 12 16 20 24 4 4 8 12 16 20 24
5 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 5 10 15 20 25 30
6 6 12 18 24 30 36 6 6 12 18 24 30 36
WINS 16 2 2 4 6 8 10 12 WINS 25 2 2 4 6 8 10 12
LOSES 19 LOSES 10 16
3 3 6 9 12 15 18 3 3 6 9 12 15 18
TIES 1 TIES 1
4 4 8 12 16 20 24 4 4 8 12 16 20 24
5 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 5 10 15 20 25 30
6 6 12 18 24 30 36 6 6 12 18 24 30 36
WINS 32 2 2 4 6 8 10 12 WINS 35 2 2 4 6 8 10 12
LOSES 3 LOSES 0
3 3 6 9 12 15 18 3 3 6 9 12 15 18
TIES 1 TIES 1
4 4 8 12 16 20 24 4 4 8 12 16 20 24
5 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 5 10 15 20 25 30
6 6 12 18 24 30 36 6 6 12 18 24 30 36
FIgurE 7.11
The first card has the The second card can be The third card can be The fourth card can be
probability of one that it any of the thirty-nine any of the twenty-six any of thirteen cards that
matches nothing. that do not match the that do not match the do not match the suits of
suit of the first card. suits of cards 1 or 2. cards 1, 2, or 3.
We can see that there are four slots, but we are not interested in get
ting the same kind of result—we only want to know the circumstances un
der which the four slots are filled with four different suits. For example:
• The first card did not match anything: It has a probability of 1.00 (a
certainty).
• The second card is pulled out of the fifty-one cards left and there
are thirty-nine that are from the other three suits. Thirty-nine out of
fifty-one times (76.47 percent of the time) the second card will be a
different suit.
• The third card is pulled out of fifty, and there are twenty-six cards
from the two suits not in the hand. Twenty-six out of fifty means that
52 percent of the time the third card will be different from the first
two cards.
The probability of someone getting these first three different would be
.7647 *.52 = .3976 or only about 40 percent of the time.
Like the fundamental counting principle (FCP), the probabilities are
multiplied together to determine how likely both events occurring might
be. In this case, the fourth card is pulled from forty-nine cards; we are
trying to get one of the thirteen cards from the one suit we don’t have.
Thirteen out of forty-nine is 26.53 percent. The joint occurrence and
joint probabilities would be .7647 * .52 * .2653 = .1054. Only 10.54 per
cent of the time would we expect to see a hand with all four suits.
CONCludINg THOugHTS
PlANNINg CONSIdErATIONS
Authentic Experiences
What are the real-life situations or contexts in which students
Will they see the concept in their science or social studies classes?
understanding?
solving?
How can I encourage initial play and exploration with the materials
or ideas?
249
Language Representations
How do I talk about the concept or ask questions to reveal
activities?
writing?
Other Representations
How do I scaffold experiences so that the representations students
going on?
act out?
into a table?
to see?
connections?
to patterns?
could I make?
the activity?
There are more than fifty problems or activities in this book and we want to
help readers quickly find them. We have included with each problem the
mathematical concepts that can be connected to it. Almost all problems
require some computation, however; therefore we include computational
concepts only when they are specially emphasized. Similarly, process
standards abound in these problems and activities, especially multiple
representations; if a process standard is cited, it is especially important.
Introduction
A Checkerboard of Squares (area dimensions, exponents, KWC, square
Chapter 1
The Tall Tale of the Two Texas Ranches (area, distance in miles, KWC,
The Even Taller Tale of the Two Texas Ranches (area and perimeter of
Chapter 2
depths, temperature) 53
255
integers) 76
or repeated subtraction) 80
Square the Digits and Sum the Squares (exponents, inductively deriving
spreadsheets) 87
Chapter 4
proportional reasoning) 95
reasoning) 99
similarity) 123
Chapter 5
solution) 158
Chapter 6
similarity) 191
symmetry) 196
triangles) 209
figures) 214
numbers) 214
Metric System
Silent Snow, Secret Snow (area, capacity, conversion, length, mass,
Chapter 7
sampling) 221
Montana Red Dog (chance, decimals, fair game, fractions, frequency data,
patterns) 235
[FCP]) 245
[FCP]) 245
pre-algebra, 69 defined, 51
Learn), 19
35–36, 247
Education, The), 69
mathematical learning, 20–21
conditionalized knowledge, 21
Carroll, Lewis
conditions, in KWC process, 9–10
Chance, 220–21
deepening, in KWC process,
Learn), 19
in problem solving, 59
cognition
connections between problems and
integrating comprehension
students lives, making, 22,
56–61
kinds of, 36
situated, 51
local concept development,
communication, in NCTM
36–37, 51
standards, 57
naturally derived right
Comprehending Math (Hyde), 21,
connections, planning for,
57, 69, 138–39, 158
37–43
comprehension, reading. See right connections, 35–36
concepts
context cues
concept labels, 80
misconceptions about, 7
connections, making
context problems, solving multiple,
meaningful, 61–64
22, 51–55
curriculum, conceptualizing
commonalities, finding, 55
math, 65–67
using Braid Model, 51–54
defined, 35
contexts, cognitively-based
fragmentation of, 35
planning for, 22, 55–56
kinds of, 36
Culture of the School and the
36–37, 51
68
in problem solving, 23
deductive reasoning, 24
Perspective on Problem
products, 73
and Standards for School
metacognition, 21
Mathematics, 21, 57, 61
metacognitive monitoring as
National Research Council (NRC),
cognitive strategy, 57
19
metapresentations, 45–46
negative slope situations, 138–58
solving, 23–24
7
partial products, 69–79
14
mental math with, 73
213
abstract representations, 72–73
with experimental probability,
partial quotients, 79–94
231
partitioning, misconceptions about,
“Missing Ingredients in Math
14
Thinking,” 247
Pass the Pigs game, 225
probability, 228–35
Penrose, Roger (Sir), 207–8
modeling
Piaget, Jean, 20
internal models, 37
Pittner, Lynn, 1–2
linear, 166–68
planning