The Process of Land Development in Sarawak
The Process of Land Development in Sarawak
CHAPTER II
According to Deon (2002), they are three general categories of land development
that describe intended usage are commercial, industrial and residential.
7
In contrast, industrial development, which can vary from heavy to light, focus on
providing suitable property for activities associated with processing for materials and
production of goods. Land that improved for industrial use can be located within an
industrial park or urban area or can exist as a stand-alone facility. These developments
are predicted on favorable social and political factors, affordable property, and the
availability of material and labour. Today, most industrial developments place emphasis
on aesthetics and the preservation of natural open space while minimizing noise, smoke,
odour, dust, noxious gases, heat, fire hazards, explosions and so on.
8
The conversion of property for safe, serviceable, and affordable residences along
with associated facilities is within the scope of residential land development. Although
commercial and industrial developments have individualized and specialized needs,
many aspects are common to all three types, including transportation, utility and drainage
considerations. Typical types of residential developments entail a single dwelling unit on
each building lot. Multifamily developments might encompass townhouses, apartments,
or in other configuration approved by relevant local authorities
From the urbanization policy point of view, the rate of urbanization tends to
correlate significantly with economic growth. One inevitable consequence of this
structural change and the consequent rapid economic growth that has averaged an
impressive eight per cent per annum in the past decade, has been the increasing
urbanization of the country, and is it no exemption for the state of Sarawak as well. As
reported by Department of Statistic Sarawak (1990), in 1980 the population living in
urban areas was 35 per cent but this figure has shot up to 55 per cent in 1995. Table 2.1
is showing the urbanization rate of the state.
9
1
Based on the Population and Housing Census of 1991
2
Includes Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan
The impact of rapid growth and urbanization is naturally reflected in the number
of people living in local authority areas. According to a study made by the Ministry of
Housing and Local Government in 1988, 68 per cent of the population in Malaysia live in
local authority areas and make demands upon urban services. The enlargement of urban
10
areas also means an increase in the problems, needs and complexities relating to urban
governance.
It has created a new set of challenges that entail an enhancement in the capacity
and capability of the Malaysian local authorities. These problems demand new
approaches, strategies as well as practical and effective answers and solutions for urban
and local government managers. As noted by Davey (1993), the role of urban
government in managing urban growth cannot be taken for granted in the context of
today's debate.
Therefore, the state government of Sarawak has come out with the idea of
resettlement scheme for residential purposes with the specific aim that the illegal
squatter’s problem could be tackle off effectively.
The resettlement scheme projects were approved under the Head: (D81) Housing
and Sub-Head: (01) Residential Schemes which it is funded by the Ministry of Finance
and Public utilities of Sarawak. A total of 53 numbers of projects had been approved
throughout the state with a total allocation of RM102, 955,526 in Seventh Malaysia Plan.
Under the 8th Malaysia Plan, the government are more concern on the low and
medium income group, with that, a total of RM277, 689,000 (about 277 million) have
been approved and allocated to Land and Survey Department to implement the 146
Kampong Extension Scheme in Sarawak. The breakdown of the project distribution is as
Table 2.2.
Based on the ‘Lapi Report’ by the Land and Survey Department, the records
shows that 76 projects has been completed as at December of 2003, this is about 52.05%
of the approved project. All the projects are implemented through the appointed
engineering consultant to do the preliminary study, topographical survey, design, manage
and as quality control agent of the project. The records also very clearly show that none
of the project cost is exceeding RM3, 000,000.00. Figure 2.1 showing the completed
infrastructure work of the project.
Table 2.2: Breakdown of allocation under Eighth Malaysia Plan for project
kampong extension scheme
(Source: Land and Survey Department Sarawak, 2004)
12
No. Of Approved
Approved MTR
Division Approved 8th MP
Allocation
Projects Allocation
1. Kuching 7 28,533,000 31,270,000
6. Bintulu 0 0 0
( A)
(b)
Figures 2.1 Pictures showing the competed resettlement schemes
14
In Sarawak, the Ministry of Forestry was merged with Ministry of Land and
Mineral to form the Ministry on 12th July 1985. As a result, the newly established
Ministry does not only have a wide scope of activities and responsibilities but also has
expanded roles.
The main function of the Ministry of planning and Resource Management are;
a. Land Code
b. Forest Ordinance
c. National Parks and Natural Reserve Ordinance
d. Wild Life Protection Ordinance
e. Mining Ordinance
f. Forest Concession Area (Rehabilitation and Development)
Ordinance
g. Public Parks and Green Ordinance
h. Natural Resources and Environmental Ordinance
15
Beside Land and Survey Department is coordinate and implement activities under
this Ministry, the other departments are:
A. Forest Department
B. Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corporation Land Custody
and Development Authority
C. Natural Resources and Environmental Board
D. Forest Concession Area (Rehabilitation and Development) Fund
The detail functions in term of land development control can be divided into two
sections:
1) Land Section:
2) Planning Section
The level of importance of the existence this ministry can be observed by the
roles being play and function given. Beside to monitor the few departments stated, it’s
also act as secretariat to the following committees:
The Figure 2.2 is showing the overall organization structure of the Ministry of
Planning and Resource Management
17
Committee:
1. State Planning Committee
2. Industrial Land Committee
3. Plantation Land Committee
4. Forestry Enforcement Committee
5. Log Supply Monitoring & Royalty
Rebate Committee
6. State Mineral Resources Committee
7. State Geographical Naming
Committee
8. State Resettlement Scheme
Committee
The Land and Survey Department is under the terms of the Inter-Government
Committee and the Constitution of Malaysia, land and cadastral surveys are State
subjects which come under the portfolio of the Ministry of Planning and Resource
Management of the State, and subject to the direction of yang di Pertua Negeri. One of
the chief aims of present policy is to ensure that land is to be alienated and administered
to the best advantage and to generate economic benefits to the state and its inhabitants,
having due regard to plan development and to the future land requirements of a growing
population in accordance with the concept of the politic of development.
The State Planning Authority or SPA is the central planning authority for the state
of Sarawak. With the increasing number of applications for subdivision in land
development and numerous changes and innovations in recent development, there is a
need to oversee better control and development in the state. Following the introduction
of part X of the Land Code (Amendment) Ordinance 1997, the SPA was set p and came
into effect on 1 August 1998 to fulfill this need.
Management
Deputy Chairman The State Secretary of the State
Member The Director of Land and Survey Department
Not more than three (3) members of which two
Members
shall be public officer
Planning-related laws and regulations have existed for a long time in the history
of Sarawak. The first known planning law, The Town and Country Planning Ordinance
was enacted in 1952; however, it was never invoked in the state, as the previous were
considered impractical to the state then.
21
In order to consolidate all previous laws into one legislation covering land
registration, settlement of customary rights, alienation and land acquisition, a new Land
Code was created. In formulating this comprehensive land laws, the Government took
into consideration other ordinances at home and abroad. Some of those referred to are as
follows:
(6) The Land Code (Cap. 138) of the Federated Malay States
This Land Code (Cap. 81)(Ordinance No.8 of 1957) came into force on 1 January
1958 and consolidated all legislations pertaining to land administration before this. The
main characteristics of the land tenure system under the Land Code are as follows: -
(i) The classification of lands into Mixed Zone Land, Native Area Land,
Native Customary Land, Reserved Land and interior Area Land as provided under
the repealed Land Classification Ordinance, 1948 is retained. The distribution of
the various classification is as shown below.
.
Reserved Land
30%
Native Area
Land
12% Interior Area
Land
36%
Native
Customary Land Mixed Zone
13% Land
9%
(b) Leases
v) All rivers, streams, canals, creeks and water courses and the bed thereof is
and shall be vested solely in the Government. (Section 12) and control
24
under State Land. Except in the case of provisional leases issued pursuant
to Section 29, all lands must be surveyed prior to the issue of titles,
vi) Section 132 mentioned that the land registration system follows the
Torrens System and all titles issued under this system are indefeasible and
protected by the Government.
vii) For the purposes of Government development, all alienated lands and
Native Customary Land can be acquired or rights shall extinguished subject to
payment of adequate compensation. (Section 47 and Section 5(3)). Subject to
Section 36, all land shall be subjected to the right of the Government to prospect
for minerals and to the right conferred on any person by license issued under any
written law for the time being relating to mining, to prospect for minerals upon
payment to the proprietor or occupier by compensation for disturbance or any
damage cause to property.
Land Code (1958) forms the legal structure on which the Land and Survey
Department administer all land matters in the State. However, it has limited usage in the
urban planning process, because it only contains provision enabling the variation of title
conditions of land through the procedure of surrender and re-alienation, and provide the
subdivision of land outside the scheduled “Development Areas”, development control
had being carried out.
The Land Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 1997, with the incorporation of Part X
of the Land Code, concerns “basically with the procedures and requirements of
Development Control”. The Explanatory Statement on the development of planning in
Sarawak. It is the first time that a proper planning authority (i.e. State Planning
Authority ~ SPA) is established in the State, with its various planning function spelt out
clearly under the law. The enactment also enables the tightening and streamlining of the
procedures of development control and planning applications.
The manual consists of five parts; the first part of the manual deals with
plan making process. The second part of it is to outlines the procedures for subdivision
and development, including the submission and approval of building plans. This part
also contains detailed checklist, flow charts and the conditions of approval.
26
Third part deals with the land use and the forth part deals with specific
State Planning Authority rules which may be made the approval of the Majlis Mesyuarat
Kerajaan Negeri, for carrying out the provisions of section 248(1) and 248(2) of the Land
Code (Amendment, 1997,). The last part is concerned with adopted policies of the
Authority to be used as a guide when considering the development applications as
provided for in section 229(1)(d) and 229(1)(e) of the Land Code (Amendment, 1997)
Naturally, after thirty years, most of the standards are outdated and are no longer
useful to regulate the modern type or scale of development. Therefore, the State
Planning Authority that formed in 1998 (after the amendments of Land Code (Cap. 81) in
November 1997) considers that this is the opportune time to review and update the
existing standard.
Hence, the Development Control Manual being published and adopted by the
State Planning Authority as a guide for regulating the subdivision and development of
land or buildings under part X, section 248 of the Land Code (1997) Ordinance It is
basically an updated and slightly amplified version of the previous development Control
Manual, 1968, published by the Land and Survey Department.
The Development Control Manual, (1998), set out the standards which are
basically concerned with the physical and spatial dimensions of space provision, in
relation to land and buildings, so as to ensure orderly, well planned and sustainable
development. However, there are of course other important environmental factors and
government's planning policies, which are not necessarily covered in these standards, but
are all to be given significant weights in the decision making process.
27
The land development by the government will go through massive processes right
from the proposal till the construction stages. Generally, the idea was proposed by the
local leader of the particular village or by the Superintendent of that particular divisional
level of land and Survey Department.
The Planning Officer of Divisional will go through and study the need of the site
by getting feedback from Settlement Officer and at the same time will looking for vacant
land for that development. Initial layout will be drawn out and to proposed to Director of
Department through Superintendent’s recommendation.
The Assistant Director of Planning will brief The Director on the need of the
project, the scope, as well as the cost and implementation period. Finally, the proposal
will be presented to the State Planning Authority to gain for approval to proceed with the
project. The overall process from planning to the approval of site and projects are as
Figure 2.3.
6