0% found this document useful (0 votes)
653 views27 pages

Client:: Structural Analysis and Design Report Office Building

The document provides a structural analysis and design report for an existing 4.5 story office building located in Chautara, Nepal. The report includes an introduction describing the building, assumptions made, and design loads. A finite element model was created in ETABS and modal analysis was performed to determine participating mass ratios. Load combinations were defined according to Indian standards for concrete design. The analysis results will be used to design the building's beams, columns, foundation, and slab.

Uploaded by

Roshan Kejariwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
653 views27 pages

Client:: Structural Analysis and Design Report Office Building

The document provides a structural analysis and design report for an existing 4.5 story office building located in Chautara, Nepal. The report includes an introduction describing the building, assumptions made, and design loads. A finite element model was created in ETABS and modal analysis was performed to determine participating mass ratios. Load combinations were defined according to Indian standards for concrete design. The analysis results will be used to design the building's beams, columns, foundation, and slab.

Uploaded by

Roshan Kejariwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN REPORT

Office Building

Client:

Consultant:
Roshan Kejariwal
NEC No-14859 civil A

May, 2019
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.1. General ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.2. Data and Assumptions ................................................................................................ 2
1.3. Design Loads ................................................................................................................ 3
1.4. Materials Properties .................................................................................................... 4
2. Analysis and Design of Structure ........................................................................................ 5
2.1. Finite Element Modeling ............................................................................................. 5
2.2. Model participating mass ratios.................................................................................. 6
2.3. Base Reaction .............................................................................................................. 7
2.4. Load Combinations ...................................................................................................... 7
2.5. Analysis Results ........................................................................................................... 8
2.6. Beam and Column Design ........................................................................................... 9
2.7. Foundation Design ...................................................................................................... 9
2.8. Slab Design ................................................................................................................ 10
3. Conclusion and Recommendation.................................................................................... 10
4. Annexes ............................................................................................................................ 11

Page 1 of 27
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. General
The structure is RC framed, four and half story official building. The building is regular in
plan and elevation. The building has suffered minor damage in earthquake of 2015. The
analysis is done for existing building.

1.2. Data and Assumptions


Building Type Official building
Location Chautara
Building Shape Regular
Type of Structure RCC Framed Structure
Stories 4 and half
Story Height 3.2m
Total Height 16m
Soil Type II (IS 1893_Part 1: 2002)
Seismic Zone Factor, Z 0.36
Importance Factor, I 1
Response reduction 5
factor, Rcoefficient, Ah
Seismic .09
Column Size existing 450 mm X 450 mm,
300mmx300mm

Column size new 600mmx 600mm all

Beam size Tie Beam: 300 mm X 300 mm,


Floor Beam: 300mm X 500mm
Slab Thickness mm,
125 mm
Live Load in rooms 3kN/m2
Live load in Verandah 3kN/m2
Live load in Staircase 3kN/m2
Live load in Roof 3kN/m2
Reinforcement grade for Fe500
main bars
Reinforcement grade for Fe500
stirrupsof Concrete
Grade M25 for all structural concrete
Fundamental time period 0.4Sec
of building
Soil Bearing Capacity 120KN/m2(Assumed to be
verified before construction)

Page 2 of 27
1.3. Design Loads
Live Load (Based on IS 875_Part 2: 1987):

Rooms : 3 kN/m2

Verandah : 3 kN/m2

Staircase : 3 kN/m2

Roof : 3 kN/m2

Dead load (Based on IS 875_Part 1: 1987):

Unit weight of Brick : 20kN/m3

Unit Weight of Concrete : 25 kN/m3

Earthquake Load (Based on IS 1893: 2002 part 1):

IS 1893:2002 Response Spectrum


1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Sa/g

0.5
0.4 IS 1893-DBE
0.3 IS-1893-MCE
0.2
0.1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10

Time Period, Sec.

Figure 1-1 IS 1893: 2002 Response Spectrum

Assumptions:

Importance factor, I = 1.0


Response Reduction Factor, R = 5
Soil Type = Type II (Medium soil)

Page 3 of 27
1.4. Materials Properties
Grade of concrete : M25

Grade of Steel for main bars : Fe500

Grade of steel for stirrups : Fe500

Unit weight of Concrete : 25 kN/m3

Unit Weight of Steel : 78.5 kN/m3

Unit weight of brick masonry : 20kN/m3

Young’s modulus of concrete, E : 5000 = 22360 ⁄

Poisson’s ratio for concrete : 0.2

Poisson’s ratio for steel : 0.3

Page 4 of 27
2. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF STRUCTURE
2.1. Finite Element Modeling
Finite element model has been prepared in ETABS 2016. Beams and frames were modeled
as frame element while slabs were modeled as shell element. Material properties and loads
were assigned as mentioned above. Rigid diaphragm for concrete slab was assigned at each
floor level. Figure shows the finite element model of the building, modeled with ETABS16..

Figure 2-1 Finite element model of the building in ETABS 2016

Preliminary dimension of the structural elements are as follows:


Column Size: 600 mm X 600 mm
Beam Size: Tie Beam: 300mm x 300 mm
All floors beam: 300mm x 500 mm
Slab thickness: 125 mm
Brick masonry wall: 230 mm and 111 mm

Page 5 of 27
Figure 2-2 Wall load

2.2. Model participating mass ratios

TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios


Case Mode Period UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY RZ Sum RZ
sec
Modal 1 0.575 0.7675 0.001 0 0.7675 0.001 0.0303 0.0303
Modal 2 0.484 0.0034 0.788 0 0.7709 0.7891 0.0183 0.0486
Modal 3 0.414 0.0256 0.0218 0 0.7965 0.8109 0.7599 0.8085
Modal 4 0.177 0.117 0.0005 0 0.9135 0.8114 0.0019 0.8104
Modal 5 0.153 0.0012 0.1151 0 0.9147 0.9265 0.0054 0.8158
Modal 6 0.127 0.0019 0.0071 0 0.9166 0.9335 0.1191 0.9349

Page 6 of 27
Modal 7 0.108 0.0395 0.0001 0 0.9561 0.9337 0.0011 0.936
Modal 8 0.096 0.0001 0.0258 0 0.9562 0.9594 0.0015 0.9375
Modal 9 0.085 0.0007 0.0041 0 0.9569 0.9636 0.0146 0.9522
Modal 10 0.074 0.0292 0.0041 0 0.9861 0.9676 0.00001982 0.9522
Modal 11 0.072 0.0037 0.0235 0 0.9898 0.9912 0.0056 0.9578
Modal 12 0.065 0.0000154 0.0007 0 0.9898 0.9919 0.0366 0.9944

2.3. Base Reaction

TABLE: Base Reactions


Load Case/Combo FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
eqx 1 -792.8754 0 0 0 -7980.1586 4689.5787
eqy 1 0 -792.8754 0 7980.1586 0 -4318.2664

2.4. Load Combinations


Different load combinations are made as per IS code and critical one is selected for
design of the member.

Load Combination for Concrete Design:

Comb. Name Combination


DCon1 1.5DL
DCon2 1.5 (DL + LL)
DCon3 0.9 DL + 1.5EQX
DCon4 0.9 DL - 1.5EQX
DCon5 0.9 DL + 1.5EQY
DCon6 0.9 DL - 1.5EQY
DCon7 1.2 (DL + LL + EQX)
DCon8 1.2 (DL + LL - EQX)
DCon9 1.2 (DL + LL + EQY)
DCon10 1.2 (DL + LL - EQY)
DCon11 1.5 (DL + EQX)
DCon12 1.5 (DL – EQX)
DCon13 1.5 (DL + EQY)
DCon14 1.5 (DL – EQY)

Page 7 of 27
2.5. Analysis Results

Figure 2-2Bending Moment Diagram along Y Combination DCon3

Page 8 of 27
Figure 2-3Bending Moment Diagram along X for Combination DCon3

2.6. Beam and Column Design


Reinforcement output from ETABS2016 and manual calculation for beam and columns are
attached in Annex.

2.7. Foundation Design


Based on bearing capacity of soil, foundation sizes and reinforcement were calculated in
separate Excel sheet, which is attached in Annex.

Page 9 of 27
2.8. Slab Design
Slab design was prepared separately in MS-Excel and also checked with the SAFE 2014
result. Manual design is attached in Annex.

3. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION


Analysis and design of the public building was prepared based on IS Codes. For analysis and
design ETABS 2016 software was used. Whenever was necessary to check ETABS result,
manual calculations were also performed. M25 grade of concrete and Fe500 grade rebar
were used for analysis and design. Seismic analysis and design was performed based on IS
1893: 2000 for concrete. For detailing of reinforcement SP 34 and Ductile Detailing Code IS
13920 were used. The building was designed to meet the required performance level
expected by of IS Code for residential building purpose.

We greatly recommend to use standard quality of construction materials and regular


supervision during construction by the qualified Engineer.

Page 10 of 27
4. ANNEXES
Annex1: Foundation Design

Annex2: Slab Design

Annex3: Staircase Design

Annex4: Beam and Column Design

Page 11 of 27
Annex-1: Foundation Design

Page 12 of 27
New footing requirements
Gri Length, Breadth, Depth, Remark
Type d m m m Reinf, X-dirn Reinf, Y-dirn s
16dia@100mmc 12dia@100mmc top and
Combined 1 13 2 0.6 /c /c bottom
2& 16dia@100mmc 12dia@100mmc top and
Combined 3 13 5 0.85 /c /c bottom
16dia@100mmc 12dia@100mmc top and
Combined 4 13 3.8 0.8 /c /c bottom

Existing footing size


Type Grid Length,m Breadth,m Depth,m

Isolated ALL 1.85 1.85 0.5

Page 13 of 27
Annex-2: Slab Design
DESIGN OF
SLAB
AS PER IS
456: 2000

1. Data
Material :
Concrete Grade
20 N/mm2
(fck) =
Reinforcement Steel
500 N/mm2
Grade (fy)

Dimensions:
Short Span = Lx = 3.73 m
Long Span = Ly = 3.96 m

Effective Cover = 15 mm

Boundary Two edges


4
Condition = discontinuous
(Critical support
conditions)

Load :
Floor Finish Load
1 kN/m2
wf=
Live Load wL = 2 kN/m2

2. Calculation
Aspect ratio =
1.06
Ly/Lx =
Slab designed
Two Way Slab
as:

Bending Moment
(Table 26 of IS 456-2000)
Coefficients:
x support = 0.0507 For short span support moment.
x span = 0.0381 For short span span moment.
y support = 0.047 For Long span support moment.
y span = 0.035 For Long span span moment.

Assumed overall depth D = 125 mm OK


Effective depth d = D - Eff. Cover = 110 mm
Selfweightwself = 25 x
3.125 kN/m2 ( Density of concrete assumed 25 kN/m3)
D/1000 =

Page 14 of 27
Total load = w =
6.125 kN/m2
wself+wf+wL=
Factored load = wu = 1.5 x
9.188 kN/m2
w=
Factored Bending Moments = Coefficient x wu x
Lx2

3.
Reinforcement
Mu = 0.87 fyAst d (1 - Astfy / bdfck) (Clause G-1.1 of IS 456-2000)
Astreq
(mm2/ m)
Mux support= 6.491 kN m 140.10
Mux span= 4.875 kN m 104.36
Muy support= 6.020 kN m 129.63
Muy span= 4.483 kN m 95.77

Minimum Astreq = 0.12% of 1000 x D = 150 mm2 per meter

Reinforcement Provided:
Short Span
8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK
Support:
Short Span
8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK
Span:
Long Span
8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK
Support:
Long Span Span: 8 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 334.9 OK

4. Check for Deflection:


Basic L/d = 26 (Clause 23.2.1 of IS 456-2000)
Modification
2.00 (Figure 4 of IS 456-2000)
factor =
d req as per deflection control= Lx / (Basic L/d x Modification 71.
mm
factor)= 80
d
d required < so, OK
provided

5. Check for
Shear:
Factored Shear Force Vu = wu x Lx/2 = 17.15 kN
Nominal Shear Stress (v)
0.156 N/mm2
= Vu/ bd=
(Clause 40.2.1.1 of IS 456-
k= 1.30 for D = mm
125 2000)
0.3 (Table 19 of IS
c= 0.386 N/mm2 for pt = 100Ast/bd = 04 456-2000)
Permissible shear stress =
k c = 0.502
N/mm2 > v SAFE

Page 15 of 27
Annex-3: Staircase Design
DESIGN OF
STAIRCASE
AS PER IS 456:
2000

1. Data
Floor height = 2.8448 m
Height for one flight = 1.4224 m
Riser height = 178 mm
Tread width = 300 mm
Effective span = 2.667 m
No. of riser in each flight = 7.99
No. of tread in each flight = 6.99

fck = 20 N/mm2
fy = 500 N/mm2

2. Calculation
Assume overall depth of waist slab = D = 125 mm
Clear cover = 20 mm
Diameter of main reinforcement = 12 mm
Effective depth of waist slab = 99 mm

2
DL of waist slab = 3.125 kN/m
2
DL on horizontal area = 3.634 kN/m
2
DL of steps = 2.225 kN/m
2
LL = 3 kN/m
2
Floor finish = 1 kN/m
2
Total load = w = 9.859 kN/m
2
Factored load = wu = 14.788 kN/m

3. Depth of waist slab


Factored BM = Mu = wu L2/8 = 13.15 kNm
Mu = 0.138 fck b d2
Therefore,


Mu
d=
0.138 fck b
= 69 mm OK
D = 125 mm
d= 99 mm

Page 16 of 27
4. Reinforcement
Mu = 0.87 fyAst d (1 - Astfy / bdfck) (Clause G-1.1 of IS 456-2000)
Substituting the values we get,
10.875 L12 -43065 L1 + 13148180 =0
Solving we get,
Ast = 333 mm2
Hence provide 12 mm diameter bars @ 100 mm c/c
Ast= 1131 mm 2
OK

Distribution reinforcement
0.12% of cross-sectional
Ast = mm2
area = 150
Hence provide 7 mm diameter bars @ 200 mm c/c
Ast= 192 mm 2
OK

5. Check for shear


Factored shear force = Vu = wuL/2 = 19.71981
Nominal shear stress = v = VU/bd = 0.20 N/mm2
(Clause 40.2.1.1 of IS 456-
k= 1.30 for D = mm
125 2000)
c= 0.648 N/mm2 for pt = 100Ast/bd = 1.142 (Table 19 of IS 456-2000)
Permissible shear stress = k c = N/mm2 > v SAFE
0.84

6. Development length
(Clause 26.2.1.1 of IS 456-
Desigh bond stress =bd= 1.92 for M25 2000)
2
Stress in bar = s = 0.87 fy = 435 N/mm
s 5220
Ld = 
bd 7.68
= 680 mm

Page 17 of 27
Annex-4: Beam and Column Design

Figure: FIRST FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

Page 18 of 27
Figure: SECOND FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

Page 19 of 27
Figure: THIRD FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

Page 20 of 27
Figure: TOP FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

Page 21 of 27
Page 22 of 27
Page 23 of 27
Page 24 of 27
Page 25 of 27
Table 1: Summary of Design of Column

Concrete = M30 Rebar = HYSD 500

New Existing New To be


S.N. Grid Location Column added, All Stirrups
Size,mm Reinf. Reinf. floors

8mm Ø stirrups
@ 100 mm C/C
(at top and
4-20 Ø+4-
1 GRID 1, near field 600x600 2973mm2 12-12Ø bottom) & @
16 Ø
150 mm C/C (at
mid height) in all
columns

8mm Ø stirrups
@ 100 mm C/C
(at top and
4-16 Ø+4-
2 GRID 2 600x600 2973mm2 16-12Ø bottom) & @
12 Ø
150 mm C/C (at
mid height) in all
columns

8mm Ø stirrups
600x600 @ 100 mm C/C
And 600 (at top and
4-20 Ø+4-
3 GRID 3 dia for 2973mm2 16-12Ø bottom) & @
16 Ø
circular 150 mm C/C (at
col. mid height) in all
columns

8mm Ø stirrups
@ 100 mm C/C
(at top and
4-20 Ø+4-
4 GRID 4, near road 600x600 4672mm2 16-12Ø bottom) & @
16 Ø
150 mm C/C (at
mid height) in all
columns

NOTE: Along Grid 3 on ground floor, circular column is missing in existing building, so it has
to be constructed as well.

Page 26 of 27

You might also like