Companion Planting & Botanical Pesticides: Concepts & Resources
Companion Planting & Botanical Pesticides: Concepts & Resources
C
Traditional Companion ompanion planting
Planting ...............................1
can be described as
Companion Planting
Chart.....................................2
establishing two or
more plant species in close
The Scientific
Foundations for proximity for some cul-
Companion Planting.......3 tural benefit (such as pest
Botanical Pesticides.........8 control or higher yield).
Options for System The concept embraces a
Design............................... 10 number of strategies that
References........................11 increase the biodiversity of
Further Resources......... 13 agroecosystems (Cunning-
Appendix: Ancient
ham, 1998).
Companions.................... 15
Generally, companion Buckwheat (left) suppresses weeds and attracts beneficial insects that can help
planting is thought of as protect brassicas (right). Photo: Andy Pressman, NCAT
This material is based upon
work that is supported by
a small-scale gardening
the National Institute of practice. However, here the term is applied in its made around the middle of the 20th century, were
Food and Agriculture, U.S. broadest sense to include applications to commer- based on the results of sensitive crystallization
Department of Agriculture, cial horticultural and agronomic crops. ATTRA tests (Philbrick and Gregg, 1966).
under award number 2013-
51106-20970. has another publication, Intercropping Principles
A step beyond companion planting is using botan-
and Production Practices, that provides additional
ically based pesticides. Companion planting is a
ATTRA (www.attra.ncat.org) information on larger-scale applications.
is a program of the National passive approach, while botanical sprays are more
Center for Appropriate Technology Although companion planting has a long history, intensive. Both rely on phytochemicals in the host
(NCAT). The program is funded
through a cooperative agreement
the mechanisms of beneficial plant interaction plant being different from the companion plant,
with the United States Department have not always been well understood. Traditional or the one being treated. One consideration for
of Agriculture’s Rural Business- recommendations (see Table 1) used by gardeners using a botanical spray that is different from sim-
Cooperative Service. Visit the
NCAT website (www.ncat.org)
have evolved from an interesting combination of ply planting a companion is that the botanical
for more information on historical observation, horticultural science, and spray may affect the host plant’s development
our other sustainable a few unconventional sources. For example, some (Tavares et al., 2011). The same can be said of
agriculture and
energy projects.
of the recommendations for companion planting, synthetic pesticides (Spiers et al., 2008).
www.attra.ncat.org Page 1
Table 1. COMPANION PLANTING CHART FOR HOME & MARKET GARDENING
(compiled from traditional literature on companion planting)
www.attra.ncat.org Page 3
(Khan et al., 2014). Also known as stimulo-deter-
rent trap cropping (Miller and Cowles, 1990), this
idea represents a revolutionary option for organic
and sustainable producers. Not only is it easily
adapted, but it also has strong foundations in sci-
entific research.
Dead-End Trap Cropping is most useful when
positioned to buffer crops from adjacent pest
sources, as with other trap-crop techniques (Shel-
ton and Badenes-Perez, 2006). In Dead-Ending,
the trap crop is attractive to the target pest but
the larvae are unable to complete their life cycle
on the trap crop. One example is the use of Cro-
seedlings planted two weeks before being inter- talaria juncea to attract the pod-boring Maruca
cropped with wheat had a 27% mortality rate, and vitrata away from such crops as cowpeas, pigeon
strawberry seedlings only had a 5% mortality rate peas, and soybeans and kill 50-100% of their
when wheat was planted eight days in advance larvae (Jackai and Singh, 1983).
(Vernon et al., 2000). This set-up could also be
considered a nurse crop in a sense. Usually nurse Semiochemically Assisted Trap Cropping
crops protect from climatic adversity, but in this makes use of pheromones rather than kairomones
case the nurse crop is protecting the strawberry (Shelton and Badenes-Perez, 2006). Semiochemi-
seedlings from attack by wireworms. cals are chemicals that carry a message, while
a kairomone is a semiochemical that may not
Multiple Trap Cropping usually involves several benefit its emitter. Plants emit kairomones and
different species of crops to maintain attractive-
ness to the pest throughout
the growth cycle of the crop
(Hokkanen, 1989). One such
system, recommended by
researchers at the University
of Florida for controlling stink
bugs and leaf-footed bugs, is
to grow Triticale, Sorghum,
Pennisetum (millet), buck-
wheat, and sunflowers around
the perimeter of the cash crop
(Mizell et al., 2008).
Push-Pull Trap Cropping
combines an attractant border
crop with a repellant intercrop
to protect crops from pests.
The most successful version of
this method was developed in
Kenya to reduce damage from
boring insects in corn. They
use a legume, Desmodium, to
repel pests (and also fix more
than 300 pounds of nitrogen
per acre) (Whitney, 1966) and
use Pennisetum as an attrac-
tant (Pickett et al., 2014). This
technology has been adopted
by more than 10,000 farmers
www.attra.ncat.org Page 5
that this companion-planting duo is beneficial in kills them. This method takes quite a while, but
desert reclamation where both nitrogen and phos- over the course of a few cycles, pernicious weeds
phorous levels are low (Mei et al., 2012). like Amaranth, nutsedge, and Bermuda grass can
be reduced. One must remember that organic
Another use for legumes is as a green manure
agriculture is an intricate system that utilizes the
crop. Green manures are crops that are grown
harmonious balances in nature for human benefit.
to be killed and then incorporated into the soil,
Attempting to pick it apart like a machine may
or left as mulch to increase soil organic matter
not give the desired results.
and, in this case of legumes, nitrogen. A Cana-
dian study showed that by incorporating graz-
ing sheep into the rotation, soil nitrogen could Modification of Root-Zone
be increased, as well as the animals’ weight-gain Environment
(Cicek et al., 2014). Companion plants can act as living mulches. One
of our favorite combinations is that of broccoli
Weed Suppression and crimson clover. Research in Hawaii showed
that this combination increases the amount of
One other benefit of legumes and other vining
spiders that patrol the broccoli plants to control
crops, such as cucurbits, is the suppression of
pests (Hooks et al., 2007), but what we value is
weeds. A well-known example is the role squash
the way the clover protects soil moisture and keeps
plays in the Three Sisters Method of growing
the soil cooler for the broccoli. In addition to cool-
beans, corn, and squash. In this situation, the
ing the soil, a companion cover crop can improve
squash plants’ prostrate vines form a dense can-
other factors—tilth, soil structure, runoff control,
opy and smother weed competition. Other com-
and water-holding capacity—and also build up
panion growing systems have also used corn but
soil organic matter (Hartwig and Ammon, 2002;
exchanged squash for Desmodium, which has a
Folorunso et al., 1992). In gardening situations
three-fold role. First, it suppresses Striga, a para-
where deciduous trees are nearby, the canopy pro-
sitic vine that devastatingly reduces corn yields
vides shade for sun-tender vegetables, but more
in Africa. Inclusion of a Desmodium compan-
importantly the leaf litter adds potassium and
ion crop triples corn yield over corn planted in
carbon to the soil. The increased organic carbon
monocrop. It appears that Striga germination is
content in turn increases water-holding capacities
suppressed by the presence of Desmodium. Next,
and Cationic Exchange Capacity, or CEC. Thus,
the Desmodium fixes nitrates for the corn crop,
trees contribute to soil carbon sequestration in two
which also lowers input needs. Third, the Desmo-
ways: first they add carbon through leaf decom-
dium is a forage legume that provides producers
position and then protect it from volatile decom-
with a secondary source of income in the form of
position by shading the material, not counting
fodder once the corn crop is finished. This system
the carbon the trees acquire in growth. If the
has but one draw-back: it is highly labor-intensive,
tree is a nitrogen-fixing legume, then there is also
requiring twice the labor of corn monoculture. In
an increase in soil nitrates (Tanga et al., 2014).
short, it’s twice the work yet triple the revenue per
The presence of either trees or cover crops allows
acre (Midega et al., 2014). Another unmentioned
mycorrhiza populations to build up in the soil
benefit could have been the manipulation of the
as well (Augé, 2001). Mychorrhiza are soil fungi
root zone to benefit the corn plants. Although
that form mutually beneficial associations with
Striga is an African problem, U.S. producers can
plant roots. They can harvest nutrients for plants
adapt the methodology that African producers use
and even water in time of drought (Kaya et al.,
to address similar challenges here.
2003). This is particularly useful in vineyards and
In a recent study, researchers failed to find con- orchards (Linderman and Davis, 2001; Schreiner,
clusive results as to whether organic produc- 2004). Mychorrhizal colonization can even influ-
tion reduced weed seeds through soil microbial ence visits by pollinators (Barber and Soper Gor-
action (Ullrich et al., 2011). From our own experi- den, 2014). Mychorrhiza-treated tomatoes showed
ences, we have found that in organic production, more total yield and more marketable yield than
weed-seed persistence is reduced by cover crops tomatoes without mycorrhiza treatment (Candido
in rotation providing a dense canopy when the et al., 2015). Mycorrhiza must have plant roots to
weed seeds are germinating. This dense canopy join with, so intercropping cover crops with veg-
starves the weed seedlings from light and thus etables or permanent plantings allows a grower to
Biochemical Pest
Suppression
As mentioned above, some plants
exude chemicals from roots or
aerial parts that suppress or repel
pests and protect neighboring
plants. Certain marigolds, for
example, release thiophene—a
nematode repellent—making
marigold a good companion for a number of gar- volatile Allium semiochemicals. The pest contin-
den crops (Marotti et al., 2010). The manufacture ues its search because the scent of the susceptible
and release by a plant of certain biochemicals, host plant was ‘masked.’
known as allelochemicals, can negatively impact
the growth of other plants. Allelochemicals such Physical Spatial Interactions
as juglone—found in black walnut— suppress
In one example of such an interaction, tall-
the growth of a wide range of other plants, which
growing, sun-loving plants may share space with
often creates a problem in home horticulture. The
lower-growing, shade-tolerant species, resulting
means by which this suppression occurs is mitosis
in higher total yields from the land. Spatial inter-
inhibition, which in turn reduces meristematic
action can also yield pest-control benefits. The
activity. In short, the juglone acts as a growth
diverse canopy resulting when corn is compan-
retardant on other plants by interfering with the
ion-planted with squash or pumpkins is believed
ability of the cells to divide (Babula et al., 2014).
by proponents of Three Sisters planting to disori-
A positive use of plant allelopathy is the use of ent the adult squash vine borer and protect the
mow-killed grain rye as a mulch. The allelochem- vining crop from this damaging pest. In turn,
icals that leach from rye residue prevent weed the presence of the prickly squash vines is widely
germination but do not harm transplanted toma- believed to discourage raccoons from ravaging the
toes, broccoli, or many other vegetables. Rye can sweet corn. Besides the classic corn example, there
be flattened with a roller-crimper and crops such is also supporting research that shows that in a
as melons can be transplanted into the residue. cowpea-sorghum companion planting, cowpeas
In this manner, melon yield is enhanced, weed were protected from the striped bean weevil due
pressures are lowered, and the soil is protected by to the physical barrier of the tillering sorghum
the rye mulch from both desiccation and erosion (Amoako-Atta, 1983).
(Ciaccia et al., 2015). Rye is known to have 16 dif-
We often think of the benefits of companion
ferent allelopathic chemicals (Schulz et al., 2013)
planting as limited to reducing pests, but it can
and is considered one of the best crops for weed
also be effective in reducing plant diseases. In
seed suppression (Jabran et al., 2015).
a pea-grain intercrop, Ascochyta blight severity
Masking is an offshoot of biochemical pest sup- was significantly reduced although there was no
pression. It makes use of volatiles to prevent a pest change in disease development. The grain inter-
from attacking its favored host. One such example crop modified the canopy microclimate by mak-
is the use of garlic and other Alliums in the garden. ing it less humid, and it also reduced the rain-
These have been found to deter the green peach drop splash effect, the means by which the disease
aphid (Amarawardana et al., 2007). If the insect spores are spread (Schoeny et al., 2008). Canopy
is searching for its host when it encounters a field microclimate can also influence insect develop-
with vegetables companion-planted with Alli- ment. Temperature changes due to canopy archi-
ums, the pest primarily smells the overpowering tecture caused moths to develop three days faster
www.attra.ncat.org Page 7
in a compact canopy versus a more open one help to keep pest populations in check. Preda-
(Kührt et al., 2006). More on spatial arrange- tors include ladybird beetles, lacewings, hover
ment can be found in the ATTRA publication flies, mantids, robber flies, and non-insects such
Intercropping Principles and Practices. as spiders and predatory mites. Parasites include
a wide range of fly and wasp species including
Nurse Cropping tachinid flies and Trichogramma and ichneumo-
Tall or dense-canopied plants may protect more nid wasps. Agroecologists believe that by devel-
vulnerable species through shading or by pro- oping systems to include habitats that draw and
viding a windbreak. Nurse crops such as oats sustain beneficial insects, the twin objectives of
reducing both pest damage and pesticide use can
have long been used to help establish alfalfa and
be attained. Numerous (552) experiments over a
other forages by supplanting the more competi-
ten-year period were examined to find whether
tive weeds that would otherwise grow in their
Farmscaping (also known as environmental engi-
place. In many instances, nurse cropping is sim-
neering) was an effective method of reducing pest
ply another form of physical-spatial interaction.
populations. The answer was a resounding yes,
It can also be a form of inter-seeding. Our earlier
but it was at a cost of production of the main crop
example from sequential trap cropping, with the
(Letourneau et al., 2011). For detailed informa-
strawberries, can also be considered nurse crop-
tion on establishing beneficial habitats, request
ping. Usually a nurse crop protects from climatic
the ATTRA publication Farmscaping to Enhance
adversity, but in this case it is protecting the straw-
berry seedlings from insect predation (Vernon et Biological Control.
al., 2000). Many times, nurse crops are used in
association with forages, where a fast-germinat- Security Through Diversity
ing grass is used with a slower-growing legume A more general mixing of various crops and vari-
(Weller, 2006). eties provides a degree of security to the grower.
If pests or adverse conditions reduce or destroy a
Beneficial Habitats single crop or cultivar, others remain to produce
Beneficial habitats—sometimes called refugia or some level of yield. Furthermore, the simple mix-
insectary plantings, farmscaping strips, etc.—are ing of cultivars, as demonstrated with broccoli
another type of companion plant interaction that in University of California research, can reduce
has drawn considerable attention in recent years aphid infestation in a crop (Daar, 1988). Research
(Philips et al., 2014). The benefit is derived when supports the concept that diverse crops add to
companion plants provide a desirable environment total biomass yield (Mousavi and Eskandari,
for beneficial insects and other arthropods—espe- 2011) and that risk in multi-cropping situations
cially those predatory and parasitic species which is inherently lower than in monocultures. This
increase can be attributed to a more efficient con-
sumption of soil nutrients per unit area (Eskan-
dari and Ghanbari, 2009).
Botanical Pesticides
The great thing about botanical pesticides is that
they can be made at home using common ingre-
dients. For example, many gardeners enjoy the
beauty and sometimes the flavor of nasturtiums.
Others grow them for their insect-repelling prop-
erties as a companion plant, but nasturtiums
have also been shown to have larvacidal effects
on leafminers. A methanol extraction of finely
chopped nasturtium leaves caused almost 20%
A hedgerow of corn reduction in coffee leaf miners (Alves et al., 2013).
(right) and sorghum The same kind of extract from a four-o’clock plant
(center) next to a cotton
field (left) provides habi-
killed 50% of the coffee leaf miners, and extract
tat for beneficials. Photo: of high mallow and guinea-hen weed killed 60%!
Rex Dufour, NCAT Nasturtium phytochemicals were found to be
www.attra.ncat.org Page 9
been found to be one of the best tools for biologi- because their phytochemicals would attract more
cal production systems. It works in two ways: the of the pests.
first is its aforementioned antifeedant property;
A simple botanical pesticide can be prepared from
the second is that it wreaks havoc on the insects’
four good-sized garlic cloves blended into one
physiology. This latter effect prevents molting and
quart of water. After blending, let the solution
leads to sterility. So an application of neem is both
preventative and curative (Schmutterer, 1995). sit for 10 to 15 minutes, then strain. Straining
through cheesecloth or a fine sieve is essential
Neem also has fungicidal affects and can be useful to remove the small particles that would clog a
in reducing symptoms of several garden patho- sprayer. The solution should all be used as soon as
gens (Govindachari et al., 1998). Leaf extracts possible; it is not meant to have a long shelf life.
from the neem tree are also effective (Wondafrash
et al., 2012), although a bit less effective than the One drawback of homemade botanicals is that
seed extracts. In both of the previous experiments, there is no standard for efficacy. They work for
when they tested various individual components however long they will work and then need to be
purified from the mix, none were as effective as reapplied. It’s best to have plenty of source mate-
the crude form. This is commonly the case, since rial planted around the garden and set aside for
plant constituents are often synergistically active this use. When harvesting your source material,
and additively effective. Neem’s cousin, the china- use the same rule as for harvesting leafy vegetables:
berry tree, contains similar phytochemicals and a generally, pick less than 1/3 of the plant in order
few extra meliatoxins that are harmful to mam- to give it sufficient leaf mass needed to recover.
mals. However, some forms of the Chinaberry Botanical sprays can be effective and cheap. They
tree are without those specific toxins, because the are truly a renewable resource that is an aid in
species widely varies from one area of adaptation reducing hotspots of insect pest activity in the gar-
to another. den or on the farm. Combining their use with the
Pyrethrum is often used in conjunction with various companion planting methods can increase
other pesticides in biological agriculture. Pyre- their effectiveness and reduce pest pressure.
thrums are knock-down killers, fast acting and
broad spectrum. They are effective against a range Options for System Design
of pests: ants, soft-bodied insects, beetles, moths,
Agronomists use the term “intercropping” to
leafhoppers, spider mites, stink bugs, thrips, web-
describe the spatial arrangements of compan-
worms, flies, pantry pests, and mosquitoes. Pyre-
ion planting systems. Intercropping systems range
thrum has been used to kill insects for hundreds
from mixed intercropping to large-scale strip inter-
of years. On the other hand, there are quite a few
cropping. Mixed intercropping is commonly seen
instances of insects overcoming not only pyre-
in traditional gardens where two or more crops are
thrum but also synthetic versions of the pesticide.
grown together without a distinct row formation.
Many plants express insecticidal traits. The key Strip intercropping is designed with two or more
to using them for your benefit is using them on crops grown together in distinct rows to allow for
plants that are very dissimilar and thus produce mechanical crop production. No-till planting or
different phytochemicals. For example, nastur- transplanting into standing cover crops can be
tiums repel many pests, but they are in the Bras- considered another form of intercropping. For
sica family and thus would be mostly ineffective more information on no-till planting, request the
against cabbage moths or other pests of Brassicas ATTRA publication Conservation Tillage.
www.attra.ncat.org Page 11
Hooks, C.R., R.R. Pandey, and M.W. Johnson. 2007. Using substances. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
Clovers as Living Mulches To Boost Yields, Suppress Pests, Vol. 90. p. 1210-1217.
and Augment Spiders in a Broccoli Agroecosystem. UH–
Martinez, R.T. 2007. An evaluation of the productivity
CTAHR IP-27.
of the Native American ‘Three Sisters’ agriculture system
www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/IP-27.pdf
in northern Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin. Stevens
Jabran, K., G. Mahajan, V. Sardana, and B.S. Chauhan. Point, Wisconsin.
2015. Allelopathy for weed control in agricultural systems. http://epapers.uwsp.edu/thesis/2007/Martinez.pdf
Crop Protection. Vol 72. p. 57-65.
Mei, P., L. Gui, P. Wang, J. Huang, H. Long, P. Christie,
Jackai, L.E.N., and S.R. Singh. 1983. Suitability of selected and L. Li. 2012. Maize/Faba bean intercropping with Rhi-
leguminous plants for development of Maruca testulalis lar- zobia inoculation enhances productivity and recovery of
vae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. Vol. 34. p. fertilizer P in a reclaimed desert soil. Field Crops Research.
174–178. Vol. 130. p. 19-27.
Kaya, C., D. Higgs, H. Kirnak, and I. Tax. 2003. Mycor- Midega, C.A.O., D. Salifu, T. J. Bruce, J. Pittchar, J. A.
rhizal colonization improves fruit yield and water use effi- Pickett, and Z.R. Khan. 2014. Cumulative effects and eco-
ciency in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) grown nomic benefits of intercropping maize with food legumes on
under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Plant and Striga hermonthica infestation. Field Crops Research. Vol.
Soil. Vol. 253. p. 287-292. 155. p. 144-152.
Kergunteuil, A., S. Dugravot, A. Mortreuil, A.L. Ralec, and Miller, J.R., and R.S. Cowles. 1990. Stimulo-deterrent
A.M. Cortesero. 2012. Selecting volatiles to protect Bras- diversion: a concept and its possible application to onion
sicaceous crops against the cabbage root fly, Delia radi- maggot control. Journal of Chemical Ecology. Vol. 16. p.
cum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. Vol. 144. p. 3197-3212.
69-77.
Mitchell, E.R., G. Hu, and D. Johanowicz. 2000. Manage-
Khan, Z. R., C.A.O. Midega, J.O. Pittchar, A.W. Murage, ment of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in
M.A. Birkett, T.J.A. Bruce, and J.A. Pickett. 2014. Achiev- cabbage using collard as a trap crop. HortScience. Vol. 35.
ing food security for one million sub-Saharan African poor p. 875-879.
through push-pull innovation by 2020. Philosophical Trans-
Mizell III, R.F., T.C. Riddle, and A.S. Blount. 2008. Trap
actions of the Royal Society B. Vol. 369. p.20120284.
cropping system to suppress stink bugs in the southern
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928888/
coastal plain. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural
Kührt, U., J. Samietz, and S. Dorn. 2006. Effect of plant Society. Vol. 121. p. 377–382.
architecture and hail nets on temperature of codling moth
Mousavi, S.R., and H. Eskandari. 2011. A general overview
habitats in apple orchards. Entomologia Experimentalis et
on intercropping and its advantages in sustainable agricul-
Applicata Vol. 118. p. 245–259.
ture. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sci-
Letourneau, D.K., I. Armbrecht, B.S. Rivera, J.M. Lerma, ences. Vol. 1, No.11. p. 482-486.
E.J. Carmona, M.C. Daza, S. Escobar, V. Galindo, C. Guté-
Pickett J., C.M. Woodcock, C.A.O. Midega, and Z.R.
irrez, S.D. López, J.L. Meíja, A.M.A. Rangel, J.H. Rangel,
Khan. 2014. Push-pull farming systems. Current Opinion
L. Rivera, C.A. Saavedra, A.M. Torres, and A.R. Trujillo.
in Biotechnology. Vol. 26C. p. 125-132.
2011. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A syn-
thetic review. Ecological Applications. Vol. 21. p. 9-21. Philbrick, H. and R. Gregg. 1966. Companion Plants &
How To Use Them. The Devin-Adair Co., Old Greenwich,
Linderman, R.G., and A.A. Davis. 2001. Comparative
CT.
response of selected grapevine rootstocks and cultivars to
inoculation with different mychorrhizal fungi. American Philips, C.R., M.A. Rogers, and T.P. Kuhar. 2014. Under-
Journal of Enology and Viticulture. Vol. 52. p.8-11. standing farmscapes and their potential for improving IPM
Programs. Journal of Integrated Pest Management. Vol. 5,
Manorama, K., and S.S. Lal. 2010. Potato (Solanum
No. 3. p.1-9.
tuberosum) based intercropping systems for southern hills.
Indian Journal of Agronomy. Vol. 55, No. 3. p. 215-219. Pyo, Y-H, Y.-J. Jin, and J.-Y. Hwang. 2014. Comparison of
the effects of blending and juicing on the phytochemicals
Marotti, I., M. Marotti, R. Piccaglia, A. Nastri, S. Grandi,
contents and antioxidant capacity of typical Korean kernel
and G. Dinelli. 2010. Thiophene occurrence in different
fruit juices. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science. Vol. 19,
Tagetes species: agricultural biomasses as sources of biocidal
No. 2.p. 108-114.
www.attra.ncat.org Page 13
How To Grow More Vegetables Than You Ever Thought Intercropping Research
Possible On Less Land Than You Can Imagine, 5th edi-
tion. 1995. By John Jeavons. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, CA. ATTRA Publications
Innoculation of Legumes. By University of Hawaii Nif- Intercropping Principles and Production Practices
TAL (Nitrogen Fixation by Tropical Agricultural Legumes) Farmscaping to Enhance Biological Control
Center. www.attra.ncat.org
www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/bnf/Downloads/Training/BNF%20
technology/Inoculation.PDF “Border effects on yields in a strip-intercropped soy-
bean, corn, and wheat production system.” 1996. By T.K.
J. Howard Garret’s Organic Manual. 1993. By J. Howard Iragavarapu and G.W. Randall. Journal of Production Agri-
Garret. Lantana Publishing Co., Dallas, TX. culture. Vol. 9, No. 1. p. 101-107.
A fine general guide on organic growing that features a Provides a nice literature review of research to that time on
brief table of companion herbs and the pests they repel on intercropping, highlighting the multitude of factors causing
page 48. variability in results.
Raising With The Moon: The Complete Guide to Gar- Multiple Cropping. 1976. ASA Special Publication No. 27.
dening and Living by the Signs of the Moon. 1993. By American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Jack R. Pyle and Taylor Reese. Down Home Press, Ashe-
boro, NC. “Strip intercropping for biological control.” 1993. By
Joel Grossman and William Quarles. The IPM Practitioner.
Contains both companion planting charts and a listing of April. p. 1–11.
insect repellent plants.
An excellent synopsis of intercropping. The IPM Practitio-
Rodale’s Successful Organic Gardening: Companion ner, published 10 times per year, is a benefit of membership
Planting. 1994. By Susan McClure and Sally Roth. Rodale in the Bio-Integral Resource Center (BIRC). Annual mem-
Press, Emmaus, PA. bership for individuals costs $35.
Roses Love Garlic: Companion Planting and Other Contact:
Secrets of Flowers. 1998. By Louise Riotte. Storey Com- BIRC
munications, Pownal, VT. P.O. Box 7414
Berkeley, CA 94707
Tel.: 510-524-2567
Beneficial Habitats
ATTRA Publications
Farmscaping to Enhance Biological Control
Biointensive Integrated Pest Management
Overview of Cover Crops and Green Manures
www.attra.ncat.org
www.attra.ncat.org Page 15
Table 1: Colorful Corn Varieties
Can Be
Variety Type Color Eaten Comments
Fresh
Clarage, Bloody Butcher, and Black Mexican/Iroquois. Flour Cranberry, a dark red bean with a meaty texture and a nutty
corns are usually not eaten in the green corn stage. Two excep- chestnut-like flavor, also performs well in the South and in the
tions to this rule are Anasazi and Mandan Red (Rosenthal, Northeast. Cornfield, unrelated to Genuine Cornfield, does
1993). See Table 1. well in the Pacific Northwest because it matures before the fall
rains come. A favorite in the arid Southwest is Hopi Purple,
Beans a purple bean with black crescent-moon stripes (Erney, 1996).
Beans provide a high-quality protein food source that com-
bines well nutritionally with corn. Beans also play a valuable Squash
role in the Three Sisters garden. Through a symbiotic relation-
Growing low to the ground, squash and pumpkin serve as living
ship with rhizobium bacteria, beans help to take nitrogen from
mulch. The large leaves block out much of the sunlight, thus
the air and convert it into a usable form for next year’s crop.
reducing weed seed germination. Allelopathy may be an addi-
tional factor in weed suppression (Fujiyoshi, 1998). (Allelopathy
Varieties refers to chemical secretions from a plant which have adverse
Pole beans are best adapted to directly climb the corn stalk as or phytotoxic effects on some weed species.)
opposed to sending runners across the ground. The Scarlet
Runner variety is a popular heirloom pole bean that is famous Varieties
for its large clusters of bright red flowers. Genuine Cornfield Most any variety of squash will work in a Three Sisters gar-
consistently produces in the heat of Southern summers. True den. In addition to the contemporary hybrid varieties, there
www.attra.ncat.org Page 17
Figure 3: Wampanoag Squash Mound squash mounds are located along the east, west, and south
edges of the garden in alignment with the rows of beans (see
Figure 4). Squash seedlings are usually transplanted when they
are about four inches tall and have put on their first set of true
leaves (about two weeks after the corn is planted). To protect
them from the heavy spring rains, four seedlings are planted
on the sides of the mound in sets of two, 12 inches apart (see
Figure 5) (Caduto and Burchac, 1996).
In the Hidatsa garden, there are usually four corn mounds
per row of corn. Note that the rows of corn are in alignment
but are staggered in comparison to the beans (see Figure 4).
Hidatsa corn mounds are constructed in the same way as the
Wampanoag corn and beans mound. The differences are that
Drawing by Mardi Dodson. Concept taken from Native American
Gardening by Michael J. Caduto and Joseph Bruchac only corn is planted in these mounds and eight seeds, instead
of four, are planted in the top of each mound (see Figure 6).
Traditionally, four seedlings are planted in the top of each Figure 4: Hidatsa Garden Design
mound. The seedlings are arranged to represent each of the
four sacred directions (see Figure 3). Both winter and sum-
mer varieties are planted, including pumpkins, acorn squash,
and summer crookneck squash (Caduto and Burchac, 1996).
Sunflower seeds are planted at the same time as the corn. The
smaller-flowering common sunflower, Helianthus annus, is tra-
ditionally grown in a Wampanoag Three Sisters garden. The
sunflower mounds are located at the north edge of the garden
(see Figure 1). The mounds are spaced about three feet apart
from center, with three seeds planted (one seed per hole) atop
each mound. The sunflowers seeds are traditionally harvested
after the first frost (Caduto and Burchac, 1996).
Hidatsa Gardens
In the northern plains, the Hidatsa, Mandan, and Arikara
peoples gardened along the floodplain of the Missouri River
in what is now called North Dakota. Most of the tribes in this
region used the Hidatsa garden design (see Figure 4). Hidatsa
gardens are designed to have alternating, staggered rows of corn Drawing by Mardi Dodson. Concept taken from Native American
and beans, with sunflowers growing along the north edge of Gardening by Michael J. Caduto and Joseph Bruchac.
the garden. Squash is planted after every fourth row of corn
and beans and around the east, south, and west edges of the Figure 5: Hidatsa Squash Mound
garden (Caduto and Burchac, 1996).
Sunflowers are planted as soon as the threat of frost has passed.
As in the Wampanoag garden, three sunflower seeds are planted
in small mounds three feet apart along the north edge of the gar-
den. The Hidatsa garden differs from the Wampanoag garden
when it comes to seed arrangement—all three seeds are planted
in one hole. Hidatsa varieties of sunflower produce black, red,
white, and striped seeds (Caduto and Burchac, 1996).
Plant squash indoors in peat pots or seed flats when the sun-
flowers are planted in the garden. Before planting in the gar-
den, prepare the squash mounds (about 15 inches across at the
Drawing by Mardi Dodson. Concept taken from Native American
base), with four feet between the centers of the mounds. The Gardening by Michael J. Caduto and Joseph Bruchac.
www.attra.ncat.org Page 19
each hole) are added to each waffle (see Figure 8) (Rosenthal, References
1993). As with the other two designs, sunflowers may also be
Buchanan, Carol. 1997. Brother Crow, Sister Corn. Ten
planted along the edges of the Zuni Waffle garden. Helian-
Speed Press, Berkeley, California.
thus maximilianii, a small sunflower with flower heads about
three inches wide, is most commonly grown in the Southwest Caduto, Michael J. and Burchac, Joseph. 1996. Native
(Buchanan, 1997). American Gardening. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, Colo-
rado. p. 70-93.
Summary Eames-Sheavly, Marcia. 1993. The Three Sisters: Exploring
Native American tribes of North America have made enor- an Iroquois Garden. Cornell University Cooperative Exten-
mous contributions to the foods we eat today. The dynamic sion. p. 7.
trio known as the Three Sisters not only thrive when they are Erney, Diana. 1996. Long live the Three Sisters. Organic
planted together, they offer a well-balanced, nutritious meal. Gardening. November. p. 37-40.
Over the centuries, many plant varieties and gardening styles
were developed for each major climatic region. The Wampa- Fujiyoshi, Phillip. 1998. Mechanisms of Weed Suppression
noag (Northeast and South), Hidatsa (Plains), and Zuni waffle By Squash (Cucurbita spp.) Intercropped in Corn (Zea mays
garden (Southwest) offer a range of gardening styles to accom- L.). Disserta- tion University of California Santa Cruz.
modate most growing conditions found in North America. Gabarino, Merwin S. and Sasso, Robert F. 1994. Native
Corn, beans, and squash have a unique symbiotic relationship American Heritage. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illi-
in a Native American garden. Corn offers a structure for the nois. p. 308.
beans to climb. The beans, in turn, help to replenish the soil Rosenthal, Eric. 1993. Amazing maize! Cultivate colorful
with nutrients. And the large leaves of squash and pumpkin corns. Organic Gardening. March. p. 30-35.
vines provide living mulch that conserves water and provides
Talavaya Center. No date. Talavaya Seed and Planting Man-
weed control. This ancient style of companion planting has
ual. Espanola, New Mexico. p. 5-11.
played a key role in the survival of all people in North America.
Grown together these crops are able to thrive and provide high- Wilson, Gilbert L. 1917. Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians.
yield, high-quality crops with a minimal environmental impact. Minnesota Historical Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.