0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

Factor Analysis

The document describes a factor analysis conducted on 6 variables related to customer experience at a location. The analysis extracted 3 components that explained 74.7% of the total variance. It produced correlation matrices showing relationships between variables. Component scores were saved and the reproduced correlations showed good fit with the actual correlations.

Uploaded by

Ayush Ranjan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

Factor Analysis

The document describes a factor analysis conducted on 6 variables related to customer experience at a location. The analysis extracted 3 components that explained 74.7% of the total variance. It produced correlation matrices showing relationships between variables. Component scores were saved and the reproduced correlations showed good fit with the actual correlations.

Uploaded by

Ayush Ranjan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

FACTOR

/VARIABLES location ServiceQuality Price ReviewsandFeedbacks Aesthetics


staffinteractions
/MISSING LISTWISE
/ANALYSIS location ServiceQuality Price ReviewsandFeedbacks Aesthetics
staffinteractions
/PRINT INITIAL CORRELATION SIG KMO REPR ROTATION FSCORE
/PLOT EIGEN
/CRITERIA MINEIGEN(1) ITERATE(25)
/EXTRACTION PC
/CRITERIA ITERATE(25)
/ROTATION VARIMAX
/SAVE REG(ALL)
/METHOD=CORRELATION.

Factor Analysis

Notes

Output Created 12-MAR-2019 18:54:19


Comments
Active Dataset DataSet2
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Input
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
103
File
MISSING=EXCLUDE: User-
Definition of Missing defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Missing Value Handling LISTWISE: Statistics are
based on cases with no
Cases Used
missing values for any
variable used.
FACTOR
/VARIABLES location
ServiceQuality Price
ReviewsandFeedbacks
Aesthetics staffinteractions
/MISSING LISTWISE
/ANALYSIS location
ServiceQuality Price
ReviewsandFeedbacks
Aesthetics staffinteractions
Syntax /PRINT INITIAL
CORRELATION SIG KMO
REPR ROTATION FSCORE
/PLOT EIGEN
/CRITERIA MINEIGEN(1)
ITERATE(25)
/EXTRACTION PC
/CRITERIA ITERATE(25)
/ROTATION VARIMAX
/SAVE REG(ALL)
/METHOD=CORRELATION.

Notes

Processor Time 00:00:00.90

Resources Elapsed Time 00:00:01.56

Maximum Memory Required 5928 (5.789K) bytes


FAC1_1 Component score 1
Variables Created FAC2_1 Component score 2
FAC3_1 Component score 3

[DataSet2]

Correlation Matrix

location [Service Quality] [Price] [Reviews and


Feedbacks]

Correlation location 1.000 .589 .441 .223


[Service Quality] .589 1.000 .373 .323

[Price] .441 .373 1.000 .264

[Reviews and Feedbacks] .223 .323 .264 1.000

[Aesthetics] .091 .112 .346 .433

staff interactions .032 .182 .034 .061


location .000 .000 .012

[Service Quality] .000 .000 .000

[Price] .000 .000 .004


Sig. (1-tailed)
[Reviews and Feedbacks] .012 .000 .004

[Aesthetics] .180 .130 .000 .000

staff interactions .372 .033 .365 .270

Correlation Matrix

[Aesthetics] staff interactions

location .091 .032

[Service Quality] .112 .182

[Price] .346 .034


Correlation
[Reviews and Feedbacks] .433 .061

[Aesthetics] 1.000 .124

staff interactions .124 1.000


location .180 .372

[Service Quality] .130 .033

[Price] .000 .365


Sig. (1-tailed)
[Reviews and Feedbacks] .000 .270

[Aesthetics] .106

staff interactions .106

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .635


Approx. Chi-Square 115.623

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity df 15

Sig. .000

Communalities
Initial

location 1.000
[Service Quality] 1.000
[Price] 1.000
[Reviews and Feedbacks] 1.000
[Aesthetics] 1.000
staff interactions 1.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component


Analysis.

Total Variance Explained

Component Initial Eigenvalues Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 2.325 38.751 38.751 1.891 31.523 31.523


2 1.153 19.224 57.976 1.558 25.966 57.489
3 1.002 16.697 74.673 1.031 17.183 74.673
4 .706 11.771 86.443
5 .441 7.349 93.793
6 .372 6.207 100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


Component
Matrixa

a. 3 components
extracted.

Reproduced Correlations

location [Service Quality] [Price]


a
Reproduced Correlation location .787 .734 .549

[Service Quality] .734 .752a .516

[Price] .549 .516 .566a


[Reviews and Feedbacks] .236 .275 .468

[Aesthetics] .020 .096 .379

staff interactions .010 .262 -.051


location -.145 -.108

[Service Quality] -.145 -.143

[Price] -.108 -.143


Residualb
[Reviews and Feedbacks] -.013 .048 -.204

[Aesthetics] .071 .016 -.032

staff interactions .022 -.080 .086

Reproduced Correlations

[Reviews and [Aesthetics] staff interactions


Feedbacks]

location .236a .020 .010

[Service Quality] .275 .096a .262

[Price] .468 .379 -.051a


Reproduced Correlation
[Reviews and Feedbacks] .609 .660 .087

[Aesthetics] .660 .797 .140

staff interactions .087 .140 .970


location -.013 .071 .022

[Service Quality] .048 .016 -.080

[Price] -.204 -.032 .086


Residualb
[Reviews and Feedbacks] -.228 -.026

[Aesthetics] -.228 -.016

staff interactions -.026 -.016

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


a. Reproduced communalities
b. Residuals are computed between observed and reproduced correlations. There are 8 (53.0%) nonredundant
residuals with absolute values greater than 0.05.

Rotated Component Matrixa

Component

1 2 3

location .885 .040 -.041


[Service Quality] .834 .100 .214
[Price] .595 .446 -.114
[Reviews and Feedbacks] .234 .744 .026
[Aesthetics] -.013 .889 .084
staff interactions .054 .065 .981

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.a
a. Rotation converged in 4 iterations.

Component Transformation Matrix

Component 1 2 3

1 .794 .592 .139


2 -.608 .779 .151
3 -.019 -.204 .979

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

Component Score Coefficient Matrix

Component

1 2 3

location .518 -.150 -.088


[Service Quality] .462 -.112 .162
[Price] .267 .206 -.171
[Reviews and Feedbacks] -.015 .486 -.032
[Aesthetics] -.194 .637 .028
staff interactions -.031 -.025 .959

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
Component Scores.

Component Score Covariance Matrix

Component 1 2 3

1 1.000 .000 .000


2 .000 1.000 .000
3 .000 .000 1.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
Component Scores.

You might also like