Audit Notes PDF
Audit Notes PDF
FINAL CA
MAY '19
REVISION NOTES
Advanced Auditing and
Professional Ethics
Part - I
/officialjksc Jkshahclasses.com/revision
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
:1:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
37 SA 805 Special Considerations-Audits of Single Purpose Financial Statements
and Specific Elements, Accounts or Items of a Financial Statement
38 SA 810 Engagements to Report on Summary Financial Statements
39 SRE 2400 Engagements to Review Financial Statements
40 SRE 2410 Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent
Auditor of the Entity
41 SAE 3400 The Examination of Prospective Financial Information
42 SAE 3402 Assurance Reports on Controls At a Service Organisation
43 SAE 3420 Assurance Engagements to Report on Compilation of Pro forma
financial information included in a prospectus
44 SRS 4400 Engagements to Perform Agreed Upon Procedures Regarding
Financial Information
45 SRS 4410 Engagements to Compile Financial Information
46 SQC 1 Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical
Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services
Engagements
:2:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
Management’s Responsibility
Auditor’s Responsibility
Signature Date:
Name Place:
Membership Number
Firm Name
Firm Registration Number
Annexure A: Report on Internal Financial controls, if applicable u/s 143(3)(i) of Companies Act, 2013
:3:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
2) Audit Opinion
:4:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
3) Matters apart from Audit Opinion
Paragraph Emphasis of Other Matter Going Concern Key audit Matter Report on other
Matter legal and
regulatory
requirements
Matter Financial Audit Material uncertainty Matters of Statutory
related to Items/ Notes Procedures/ over going concern utmost Reporting
to accounts Scope of audit significance Requirements-
communicated Matters
with Those prescribed by
charged With law
Governance as
per SA 260
Purpose To increase To increase To increase To bring To comply with
fundamental understanding understanding of the transparency in regulatory
understandin of the users of users of financial the audit report requirements
g of users of financial statements regarding and communicate and give
financial statements the material matters of utmost comments on
statements regarding the uncertainty over going significance for matters
regarding audit that was concern. the users of required by law
financial performed. financial
items statements
disclosed in
financial
statements
Drafting We draw The financial We draw attention to Key audit matters Section 143(1) of
attention to statements of Note XX in the are those matters Companies Act,
Note X of the ABC Company financial statements, that, in our 2013 + CARO 2016
financial for the year which indicates that professional + Sec 143(3) of
statements, ended March the Company incurred judgment, were Companies
which 31, 20X0, were a net loss of ZZZ of most Act,2013
describes the audited by during the year ended significance in our
effects of a another December 31, 20X1 audit of the
fire in the auditor who and, as of that date, financial
Company’s expressed an the Company’s current statements of the
production unmodified liabilities exceeded its current period.
facilities. Our opinion on total assets by YYY. As These matters
opinion is those stated in Note 6, these were addressed
not modified statements on events or conditions, in the context of
in respect of March 31, along with other our audit of the
this matter. 20X1 matters as set forth in financial
Note XX, indicate that statements as a
a material uncertainty whole, and in
exists that may cast forming our
significant doubt on opinion thereon,
the Company’s ability and we do not
to continue as a going provide a
concern. Our opinion separate opinion
is not modified in on these matters.
respect of this matter.
:5:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
4) Examples
:6:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
CARO 2016
Applicability
It shall apply to every company including a foreign company as defined in clause (42) of section 2 of
the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) [hereinafter referred to as the Companies Act], except–
(i) A banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10
of 1949);
(iv) a One Person Company as defined under clause (62) of section 2 of the Companies Act and a
small company as defined under clause (85) of section 2 of the Companies Act; and
(v) A private limited company, not being a subsidiary or holding company of a public company,
having
A) A paid up capital and reserves and surplus not more than rupees one crore as on the
balance sheet date and
B) Which does not have total borrowings exceeding rupees one crore from any bank or
financial institution at any point of time during the financial year and
C) which does not have a total revenue as disclosed in Scheduled III to the Companies Act,
2013 (including revenue from discontinuing operations) exceeding rupees ten crore
during the financial year as per the financial statements.
Clauses
:7:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
such loans are not prejudicial to the company’s overdue for more than 90
interest; days
(b) whether the schedule of repayment of principal
and payment of interest has been stipulated and
whether the repayments or receipts are regular;
(c) if the amount is overdue, state the total amount
overdue for more than ninety days, and whether
reasonable steps have been taken by the company
for recovery of the principal and interest
iv Compliance in respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and Verify compliance with
with Sec security whether provisions of section 185 and 186 such laws
185/186 of of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied
Companies with. If not, provide the details thereof.
Act, 2013
v Acceptance of in case, the company has accepted deposits, a) Verify compliance with
Public whether the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of sec 73-76 of companies
Deposits India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any act, 2013
other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, b) Verify compliance with
2013 and the rules framed thereunder, where any other regulatory
applicable, have been complied with? If not, the orders
nature of such contraventions be stated;
If an order has been passed by Company Law Board
or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank
of India or any court or any other tribunal, whether
the same has been complied with or not?
vi Cost Records whether maintenance of cost records has been Maintenance u/s 148 of
specified by the Central Government under sub- Companies Act, 2013
section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act,
2013 and whether such accounts and records have
been so made and maintained.
vii Statutory Dues (a) whether the company is regular in depositing a) whether company is
undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, regular in depositing
employees' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, undisputed dues(details
service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value of amount overdue for
added tax, cess and any other statutory dues to the more than 6months)
appropriate authorities and if not, the extent of the b) details of legal dispute
arrears of outstanding statutory dues as on the last in case of disputed dues
day of the financial year concerned for a period of
more than six months from the date they became
payable, shall be indicated;
(b) where dues of income tax or sales tax or service
tax or duty of customs or duty of excise or value
added tax have not been deposited on account of
any dispute, then the amounts involved and the
forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned.
(A mere representation to the concerned
Department shall not be treated as a dispute).
viii Default in whether the company has defaulted in repayment of default in repayment of
Repayment loans or borrowing to a financial institution, bank, dues belonging to govt,
Dues Government or dues to debenture holders? If yes, banks, financial
the period and the amount of default to be reported institution and
(in case of defaults to banks, financial institutions, debentureholders
and Government, lender wise details to be provided)
:8:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
ix Utilisation of whether moneys raised by way of initial public offer whether funds are
funds or further public offer (including debt instruments) utilised for specified
(IPO/FPO/TER and term loans were applied for the purposes for purposes
M LOANS) which those are raised. If not, the details together
with delays or default and subsequent rectification,
if any, as may be applicable, be reported
x Fraud whether any fraud by the company or any fraud on fraud by the company or
the Company by its officers or employees has been on the company by its
noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the employees or officers
nature and the amount involved is to be indicated noticed/reported during
the year
xi Managerial whether managerial remuneration has been paid or As per Sec 197 of
Remuneration provided in accordance with the requisite approvals companies act, 2013
mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with
Schedule V to the Companies Act? If not, state the
amount involved and steps taken by the company
for securing refund of the same
xii Nidhi whether the Nidhi Company has complied with the Nidhi rules, 2014
Company Net Owned Funds to Deposits in the ratio of 1: 20 to a) ten percent of total
meet out the liability and deposits should be kept
whether the Nidhi Company is maintaining ten per as FD
cent unencumbered term deposits as specified in b) 1(owned
the Nidhi Rules, 2014 to meet out the liability funds):20(total deposits)
xiii Related Party whether all transactions with the related parties are a) Sec 177 and Sec 188 of
Transactions in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of companies act,2013
Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and b) AS 18
the details have been disclosed in the Financial
Statements etc., as required by the applicable
accounting standards
xiv Private whether the company has made any preferential Whether funds utilised
Placement and allotment or private placement of shares or fully or for specified purposes
Preferrential partly convertible debentures during the year under
Allotment review
and if so,
as to whether the requirement of section 42 of the
Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with
and
the amount raised have been used for the purposes
for which the funds were raised.
If not, provide the details in respect of the amount
involved and nature of non-compliance
xv Non Cash whether the company has entered into any non-cash Compliance with Sec 192
Transactions transactions with directors or persons connected
u/s 192 of with him and if so, whether the provisions of section
Companies 192 of Companies Act, 2013 have been complied
Act, 2013 with
xvi Registration whether the company is required to be registered In case of NBFC, whether
Under RBI under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, RBI registration obtained?
ACT, 1934 1934 and if so, whether the registration has been
obtained
:9:
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
IFC-FR- Report upon adequacy and operating effectiveness about internal financial controls
over financial reporting u/s 143(3)(i) of Companies Act,2013.
Applicability
b) Which has turnover less than Rs. 50 crores as per latest audited financial statements and which has
aggregate borrowings from banks or financial institutions or any body corporate at any point of time
during the financial year less than Rs. 25 crores.
Requirement:
Sec 143(3)(i) of Companies Act, 2013 as amended by Companies Amendment Act, 2017
“whether the company is maintaining adequate “internal financial controls with reference to financial
statements” in place and whether such controls are operating effectively.
: 10 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 200 OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR AND THE CONDUCT
OF AN AUDIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS ON AUDITING
1 Objective:
a) To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, enabling the auditor to express
an opinion thereon
b) To report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by the SAs, in
accordance with the auditor’s findings
2 Components of Audit Risk
a Audit Risk- risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated.
b Risk of Material Misstatement- risk that the financial statements are materially misstated
prior to audit. It consists of the following
b-i Inherent Risk: The susceptibility of an assertion to a misstatement before consideration of any
related controls.
b-ii Control Risk: risk that a misstatement that could occur will not be prevented, or detected and
corrected, on a timely basis by the entity’s internal control.
c Detection Risk: The risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce audit risk to
an acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement that exists
3 Premise related to Management’s responsibility regarding financial statements:
Management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance have the following
responsibilities that are fundamental to the conduct of an audit in accordance with SAs.
a) For the preparation and presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the
applicable financial reporting framework; this includes the design, implementation and
maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
b) To provide the auditor with:
(i) All information, such as records and documentation, and other matters that are relevant to
the preparation and presentation of the financial statements;
(ii) Any additional information that the auditor may request from management and, where
appropriate, those charged with governance; and
(iii) Unrestricted access to those within the entity from whom the auditor determines it
necessary to obtain audit evidence
4 Basic Principles Governing an audit and Compliance with ethical requirements is fundamental
to achieve the objective as per SA 200
5 Compliance with SAs: In order to achieve overall objective, auditor needs to achieve objective
of individual SA that is applicable to the engagement. In exceptional circumstances, he may
perform alternate audit procedures to achieve the objective.
6 Failure to achieve an objective due to limitation on scope of audit will lead to modification to
the opinion or withdrawal from the engagement.
: 11 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 210 AGREEING TO THE TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT
1 Preconditions: If the preconditions for an audit are not present, the auditor shall discuss the
matter with management. Unless required by law or regulation to do so, the auditor shall not
accept the proposed audit engagement
a Determine whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the
financial statements is acceptable.
b Obtain the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its
responsibility as discussed in SA 200.
2 Letter of Engagement: The agreed terms of the audit engagement shall be recorded in an
audit engagement letter
a Contents
(a) The objective and scope of the audit of the financial statements;
(b) The responsibilities of the auditor;
(c) The responsibilities of management;
(d) Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the
financial statements; and
(e) Reference to the expected form and content of any reports to be issued by the auditor
b Reference to applicable law: If law or regulation prescribes in sufficient detail the terms of
the audit engagement, the auditor need not record them in a written agreement, except for
the fact that such law or regulation applies.
c Recurring audits: On recurring audits, the auditor shall assess
whether circumstances require the terms of the audit engagement to be revised and
whether there is a need to remind the entity of the existing terms of the audit engagement.
3 Changes Prior to acceptance of audit: If management or those charged with governance
impose a limitation on the scope of the auditor‟s work in the terms of a proposed audit
engagement such that the auditor believes the limitation will result in the auditor disclaiming
an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall not accept such a limited
engagement.
4 Changes after acceptance of audit:
a shall not agree to a change in the terms of the audit engagement where there is no
reasonable justification
b If the terms of the audit engagement are changed, record the new terms of the engagement
in an engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement.
c If the auditor is unable to agree to a change of the terms of the audit engagement and is not
permitted by management to continue the original audit engagement, the auditor shall:
(a) Withdraw from the audit engagement where possible under applicable law or regulation;
and
(b) Determine whether there is any obligation either contractual or otherwise, to report the
circumstances to other parties
: 12 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 220 QUALITY CONTROL FOR AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Objective:
To implement quality control procedures at the engagement level that provide the auditor
with reasonable assurance that:
(a) The audit complies with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements;
and
(b) The auditor’s report issued is appropriate in the circumstances
2 Compliance with ethical requirements
a If matters come to the engagement partner’s attention that the engagement team members
have not complied with relevant ethical requirements, the engagement partner, in
consultation with others in the firm, shall determine the appropriate action
b The engagement partner shall take appropriate action to eliminate such threats to
independence or reduce them to an acceptable level or, if considered appropriate, to
withdraw from the audit engagement.
3 Client acceptance and continuance procedure
a Information such as the following assists the engagement partner in determining whether
the conclusions reached regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationships
and audit engagements are appropriate:
- The integrity of the principal owners, key management and those charged with governance
of the entity;
- Whether the engagement team is competent to perform the audit engagement and has the
necessary capabilities, including time and resources;
- Whether the firm and the engagement team can comply with relevant ethical
requirements; and
- Significant matters that have arisen during the current or previous audit engagement, and
their implications for continuing the relationship.
4 Quality control Measures
a Direction and Supervision
b Review b Engagement Partner
c Consultation
d In case of Differences of opinion, engagement team shall follow the firm’s policies and
procedures for dealing with and resolving differences of opinion.
5 Engagement Quality control Review (EQCR): a process designed to provide an evaluation,
before the report is issued, of the significant judgments the engagement team made and the
conclusions they reached in formulating the report.
a Applicability: For audits of financial statements of listed entities, and those other audit
engagements, if any, for which the firm has determined.
b Who can conduct EQCR:
1. a partner other than engagement partner
2. suitably qualified external person
3. team made up of individuals headed by a member of the Institute
c Reviewer shall:
1. Discuss significant matters with the engagement partner.
2. Review of the financial statements and the proposed auditor’s report
3. Review of selected audit documentation
4. Evaluation of the conclusions reached in formulating the auditor’s report
: 13 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 230 AUDIT DOCUMENTATION (WORKING PAPERS)
1 Definition:
The record of audit procedures performed, relevant audit evidence obtained, and
conclusions the auditor reached.
2 Form Content and Extent of Documentation
a The nature, timing, and extent of the audit procedures performed to comply with the SAs
and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
b The results of the audit procedures performed, and the audit evidence obtained.
c Significant matters arising during the audit, the conclusions reached thereon, and significant
professional judgments made in reaching those conclusions.
3 Factors affecting form content and extent of documentation
a The size and complexity of the entity
b The identified risks of material misstatement
c The need to document a conclusion
d The audit methodology and tools used
4 Ownership of Working Papers:
Further, Standard on Quality Control (SQC) 1, “Quality Control”, provides that, unless
otherwise specified by law or regulation, audit documentation is the property of the auditor.
He may at his discretion, make portions of, or extracts from, audit documentation available
to clients.
5 Retention period:
The auditor shall assemble the audit documentation within not more than 60 days after the
date of the auditor’s report.
After the assembly of the final audit file has been completed, the auditor shall not delete or
discard audit documentation of any nature before the end of its retention period- 7 Years
from the date of Principal Auditor’s report.
6 Purpose of Maintaining Working papers:
(a) Evidence of the auditor’s basis for a conclusion about the achievement of the overall
objectives of the auditor;
(b) Evidence that the audit was planned and performed in accordance with SAs and
applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
c) Assisting the engagement team to plan and perform the audit.
(d) Assisting members of the engagement team responsible for supervision to direct and
supervise the audit work, and to discharge their review responsibilities in accordance with SA
220.
(e) Enabling the engagement team to be accountable for its work.
(f) Retaining a record of matters of continuing significance to future audits.
(g) Enabling the conduct of quality control reviews and inspections in accordance with SQC
(h) Enabling the conduct of external inspections in accordance with applicable legal,
regulatory or other requirements.
: 14 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 240 AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO FRAUD IN AN AUDIT OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
: 15 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
If the auditor withdraws:
(i) Discuss with the appropriate level of management and those charged with governance, the
auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal; and
(ii) Determine whether there is a professional or legal requirement to report to the person or
persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities, the
auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal
7 Reporting responsibility as per Companies Act, 2013
a as per section 143(12) of the Companies Act, 2013, if an auditor of a company, in the course of
the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud
is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company,
he shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government within 60 days of his
knowledge and after following the prescribed procedure.
b to report as per Clause (x) of Paragraph 3 of CARO,
2016, if there is any fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.
The nature and the amount involved are to be indicated.
: 16 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 250 CONSIDERATIONS OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS
: 17 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE
1 Matters to be communicated
a The Auditor’s Responsibilities in Relation to the Financial Statement Audit
b Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit- How the auditor plans to address the significant risks
of material misstatement, Auditor’s approach to internal control relevant to the audit.
c Significant Findings from the Audit
c-i The auditor’s views about significant qualitative aspects of the entity’s accounting practices,
including accounting policies, accounting estimates and financial statement disclosures
c-ii Significant difficulties, if any, encountered during the audit. Example: Significant delays,
unwillingness by management to provide information necessary, unavailability of expected
information.
d Auditor’s Independence:
A statement that the engagement team and others in the firm as appropriate, the firm and,
when applicable, network firms have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding
independence.
2 Factors governing Mode of Communication
a Significance of the matter
b Requirements of applicable laws and regulations
c Expectations of those charged with Governance.
3 Relationship with SA 701:
SA 701 deals with Key audit matters: These matters are selected from matters communicated
with those charged with Governance as per SA 260.
: 18 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 265 COMMUNICATING DEFICIENCIES IN INTERNAL CONTROL TO THOSE
CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT
: 19 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 299 RESPONSIBILITIES OF JOINT AUDITORS
: 20 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 300 PLANNING AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Auditor shall develop an audit plan in order to determine nature, timing and extent of audit
procedures.
2 Preliminary Engagement Activities: The auditor shall undertake the following activities at
the beginning of the current audit engagement
a Performing procedures required by SA 220, “Quality Control for an Audit of Financial
Statements” regarding the continuance of the client relationship and the specific audit
engagement- There are no issues with management integrity that may affect the auditor’s
willingness to continue the engagement
b Evaluating compliance with ethical requirements, including independence, as required by SA
220- The auditor maintains the necessary independence and ability to perform the
engagement
c Establishing an understanding of the terms of the engagement, as required by SA 210- There
is no misunderstanding with the client as to the terms of the engagement.
3 Planning activities
a Audit Strategy: The auditor shall establish an overall audit strategy that sets the scope,
timing and direction of the audit. In establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall
consider following factors:
a-i Identify the characteristics of the engagement that define its scope
a-ii Ascertain the reporting objectives of the engagement to plan the timing of the audit and the
nature of the communications required
a-iii Consider the factors that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, are significant in directing
the engagement team’s efforts
a-iv Consider the results of preliminary engagement activities and, where applicable
a-v Ascertain the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary to perform the engagement
b Audit Plan- The auditor shall develop an audit plan that shall include a description of:
b-i The nature, timing and extent of planned risk assessment procedures, as determined under
SA 315 “Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding
the Entity and Its Environment
b-ii The nature, timing and extent of planned further audit procedures at the assertion level, as
determined under SA 330 “The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks”.
b-iii Other planned audit procedures that are required to be carried out so that the engagement
complies with SAs.
: 21 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 315 IDENTIFYING AND ASSESSING RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
THROUGH UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT
: 22 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
evaluations, or a combination of the two to test the operating effectiveness.
4 Risks that require Special Audit Considerations
(a) Whether the risk is a risk of fraud;
(b) Whether the risk is related to recent significant economic, accounting, or other
developments like changes in regulatory environment, etc., and, therefore, requires specific
attention;
(c) The complexity of transactions;
(d) Whether the risk involves significant transactions with related parties;
(e) The degree of subjectivity in the measurement of financial information related to the risk,
especially those measurements involving a wide range of measurement uncertainty; and
(f) Whether the risk involves significant transactions that are outside the normal course of
business for the entity, or that otherwise appear to be unusual.
: 23 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 320 MATERIALITY IN PLANNING AND PERFORMING AUDIT
1 Material items are relatively important items i.e the knowledge of which would influence
the decisions of the users of financial statements
2 Materiality of an item depends upon particular circumstances & facts of each case. It is not
possible to lay down precisely as to what amount or what account may be material in all
circumstances. Materiality is a relative term & what may be material in one circumstance
may not be material in another
3 Application of the concept of materiality:
a. Determining which items require a separate disclosure
b. Selection of transactions
c. Evaluating Misstatements while forming an opinion
4 Identification of appropriate benchmark
A percentage is often applied to a chosen benchmark as a starting point in determining
materiality for the financial statements as a whole. Factors that may affect the
identification of an appropriate benchmark include the following:
a The elements of the financial statements (for example, assets, liabilities, equity,
revenue, expenses);
b Whether there are items on which the attention of the users of the particular
entity’s financial statements tends to be focused (for example, for the purpose of
evaluating financial performance users may tend to focus on profit, revenue or net assets);
c The nature of the entity, where the entity is at in its life cycle, and the industry and
economic environment in which the entity operates
d The entity’s ownership structure and the way it is financed (for example, if an entity is
financed solely by debt rather than equity, users may put more emphasis on assets, and
claims on them, than on the entity’s earnings)
e Relative Volatility of the benchmark
5 Performance Materiality
In order to perform audit of financial statements, auditor needs to set a level of materiality
after selecting appropriate benchmark.
However during the course of audit, auditor intends to lower the risk of not detecting a
material misstatement and hence he may verify certain transactions or financial items
which may be below the set level of materiality however such transactions appear to be
important.
Such level (which is below the materiality level) at which auditor performs his procedures is
known as performance materiality level.
6 Revision of Materiality
a. Materiality for the financial statements as a whole or for particular class of transactions
may need to be revised as a result of a change in circumstances that occurred during the
audit (for example, a decision to dispose of a major part of the entity’s business), new
information, or a change in the auditor’s understanding of the entity and its operations as a
result of performing further audit procedures.
b. If the auditor concludes a lower materiality for the same, then he should consider the
fact that whether it is necessary to revise performance materiality and whether the nature,
timing and extent of the further audit procedures remain appropriate.
: 24 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 330 AUDITOR’S RESPONSES TO ASSESSED RISK
1 Objective: to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the assessed risks of material
misstatement, through designing and implementing appropriate responses to those risks
2 Test of Controls
An audit procedure designed to evaluate the operating effectiveness of controls in preventing,
or detecting and correcting, material misstatements
a Use audit techniques to test
(i) How the controls were applied at relevant times during the period under audit.
(ii) The consistency with which they were applied.
(iii) By whom or by what means they were applied
b Determine whether the controls to be tested depend upon other controls (indirect controls),
and if so, whether it is necessary to obtain audit evidence supporting the effective operation
of those indirect controls
c shall test controls for the particular time, or throughout the period depending upon the
assessed risks of material misstatement
d While relying upon evidence obtained during previous audits, re-test the controls to check
consistency and verify changes in internal controls.
3 Test of Details
a Irrespective of the assessed risks of material misstatement, the auditor shall design and
perform substantive procedures for each material class of transactions, account balance, and
disclosure
b consider whether external confirmation procedures are to be performed
c Shall include the following audit procedures related to the financial statement closing process:
(a) Agreeing or reconciling the financial statements with the underlying accounting
records; and
(b) Examining material journal entries and other adjustments made during the course of
preparing the financial statements
d Perform audit procedures to evaluate whether the overall presentation of the financial
statements, including the related disclosures, is in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework.
: 25 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 402 AUDIT CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO AN ENTITY USING A SERVICE
ORGANIZATION
1 Objective
a) To obtain an understanding of the nature and significance of the services provided by the
service organisation and their effect on the user entity’s internal control relevant to the
audit, sufficient to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement.
b) To design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks.
2 Risk Assessment Procedure
When obtaining an understanding of the user entity in accordance with SA 315, the user
auditor shall obtain an understanding of how a user entity uses the services of a service
organisation in the user entity’s operations, including:
a The nature of the services provided by the service organisation and the significance of those
services to the user entity, including the effect thereof on the user entity’s internal control
b The nature and materiality of the transactions processed or accounts or financial reporting
processes affected by the service organisation
c The degree of interaction between the activities of the service organisation and those of the
user entity
d the relevant contractual terms for the activities undertaken by the service organisation
3 Further Audit Procedure- Test of Controls
a Obtaining a Type 2 report, if available.
The user auditor shall determine whether the service auditor’s report provides sufficient
appropriate audit evidence about the effectiveness of the controls by performing following
procedures:
a-i Evaluating whether the description, design and operating effectiveness of controls at the
service organisation is at a date or for a period that is appropriate for the user auditor’s
purposes
a-ii Whether complementary user entity controls have been identified by the service
organisation and verifying whether the user entity has designed and implemented such
controls and, if so, testing their operating effectiveness
a-iii Evaluating the adequacy of the time period covered by the tests of controls
b Performing appropriate tests of controls at the service organisation
c Using another auditor to perform tests of controls at the service organisation on behalf of
the user auditor.
4 Sub-Service Organisation
a If a service organisation uses a subservice organisation, the service auditor’s report may
either include or exclude the subservice organisation’s relevant control objectives and
related controls in the service organisation’s description of its system and in the scope of the
service auditor’s engagement.
These two methods of reporting are known as the inclusive method and the carve-out
method, respectively.
b If the Type 1 or Type 2 report excludes the controls at a subservice organisation, and the
services provided by the subservice organisation are relevant to the audit of the user entity’s
financial statements, the user auditor is required to apply the requirements of this SA in
respect of the subservice organisation
: 26 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 450 EVALUATION OF MISSTATEMENTS IDENTIFIED
1 Accumulate misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial.
2 Communicate on a timely basis all misstatements accumulated during the audit with the
appropriate level of management, unless prohibited by law or regulation. The auditor shall
request management to correct those misstatements.
3 If management refuses to correct some or all of the misstatements communicated by the
auditor, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of management’s reasons
4 The auditor shall determine whether the overall audit strategy and audit plan need to be
revised if the aggregate of misstatements accumulated during the audit approaches
materiality determined in accordance with SA 320.
5 Communicate with those charged with governance uncorrected misstatements and the effect
that they, individually or in aggregate, may have on the opinion in the auditor’s report, unless
prohibited by law or Regulation. The auditor shall request that uncorrected misstatements be
corrected.
6 The auditor shall request a written representation from management and, where appropriate,
those charged with governance whether they believe the effects of uncorrected
misstatements are immaterial, individually and in aggregate, to the financial statements as a
whole. A summary of such items shall be included in or attached to the written representation.
: 27 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 500 AUDIT EVIDENCE
1 Design and perform audit procedures in such a way as to enable the auditor to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence to be able to draw reasonable conclusions on which to
base the auditor’s opinion.
2 The reliability of information to be used as audit evidence, and therefore of the audit
evidence itself, is influenced by its source and its nature, and the circumstances under which
it is obtained, including the controls over its preparation and maintenance where relevant
3 Using the Work of management’s expert
a Evaluate the competence, capabilities and objectivity of that expert;
b Obtain an understanding of the work of that expert; and
c Evaluate the appropriateness of that expert’s work as audit evidence for the relevant
assertion.
4 Evaluation of evidence
a If:
(i) audit evidence obtained from one source is inconsistent with that obtained from another;
or
(ii) the auditor has doubts over the reliability of information to be used as audit evidence
b The auditor shall determine what modifications or additions to audit procedures are
necessary to resolve the matter, and shall consider the effect of the matter, if any, on other
aspects of the audit.
: 28 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 501 AUDIT EVIDENCE- SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR SELECTED ITEMS
: 29 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 505 EXTERNAL CONFIRMATIONS
1 Meaning: Audit evidence obtained as a direct written response to the auditor from a third
party (the confirming party), in paper form, or by electronic or other medium.
2 Type of Confirmation request
a Positive Confirmation request:
A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor indicating whether the
confirming party agrees or disagrees with the information in the request, or providing the
requested information.
b Negative Confirmation Request:
A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor only if the confirming
party disagrees with the information provided in the request.
3 Evaluating Responses
a If the auditor identifies factors that give rise to doubts about the reliability of the response
to a confirmation request, the auditor shall obtain further audit evidence to resolve those
doubts
b In the case of each non-response to positive confirmation request, the auditor shall
perform alternative audit procedures to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence
c If the auditor has determined that a response to a positive confirmation request is
necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, alternative audit procedures will
not provide the audit evidence the auditor requires. If the auditor does not obtain such
confirmation, the auditor shall determine the implications for the audit and the auditor’s
opinion in accordance with SA 705
4 External Confirmation Procedure
a Determining the information to be confirmed or requested
b Selecting the appropriate confirming party
c Designing the confirmation requests
d Sending the requests, including follow-up requests when applicable
5 Management’s refusal to allow the auditor to send confirmation request
a Inquire as to management’s reasons for the refusal, and seek audit evidence as to their
validity and reasonableness
b Evaluate the implications of management’s refusal on the auditor’s assessment of the
relevant risks of material misstatement
c Perform alternative audit procedures designed to obtain relevant and reliable audit
evidence if the reasons are valid
d If the auditor concludes that management’s refusal to allow the auditor to send a
confirmation request is unreasonable, or the auditor is unable to obtain relevant and
reliable audit evidence from alternative audit procedures,
the auditor shall communicate with those charged with governance in accordance with SA
260. The auditor also shall determine the implications for the audit and the auditor’s
opinion in accordance with SA 705.
: 30 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 510- INITIAL AUDIT ENGAGEMENT- VERIFICATION OF OPENING BALANCES
: 31 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 520 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
1 Objective:
To design and perform analytical procedures near the end of the audit that assist the auditor
when forming an overall conclusion as to whether the financial statements are consistent with
the auditor’s understanding of the entity
2 Meaning
the term “analytical procedures” means evaluations of financial information through analysis
of plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data.
3 Precautions to be taken
a Determine the suitability of particular substantive analytical procedures for given assertions
b Evaluate the reliability of data from which the auditor’s expectation of recorded amounts is
developed
c Develop an expectation of recorded amounts or ratios and evaluate whether the expectation
is sufficiently precise to identify a misstatement
d Determine the amount of any difference of recorded amounts from expected values that is
acceptable without further investigation.
4 Techniques to be used
a Trend analysis
b Ratio analysis
c Reasonableness tests
d Structural modelling
5 Evaluating Responses
Analytical procedures also encompass such investigation as is necessary of identified
fluctuations or relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information or that differ
from expected values by a significant amount.
: 32 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 530 AUDIT SAMPLING
Objective
(a) The objective of the auditor when using audit sampling is to provide a reasonable basis for
the auditor to draw conclusions about the population from which the sample is selected.
Definitions
(a) Audit sampling (sampling)
The application of audit procedures to less than 100% of items within a population of audit
relevance such that all sampling units have a chance of selection in order to provide the
auditor with a reasonable basis on which to draw conclusions about the entire population.
(b) Sampling risk
The risk that the auditor’s conclusion based on a sample may be different from the
conclusion if the entire population were subjected to the same audit procedure. Sampling
risk can lead to two types of erroneous conclusions:
(i) In the case of a test of controls, that controls are more effective than they actually
are, or in the case of a test of details, that a material misstatement does not exist when in
fact it does. The auditor is primarily concerned with this type of erroneous conclusion
because it affects audit effectiveness and is more likely to lead to an inappropriate audit
opinion.
(ii) In the case of a test of controls, that controls are less effective than they actually are,
or in the case of a test of details, that a material misstatement exists when in fact it does not.
This type of erroneous conclusion affects audit efficiency as it would usually lead to
additional work to establish that initial conclusions were incorrect.
(c) Non-sampling risk – The risk that the auditor reaches an erroneous conclusion for any reason
not related to sampling risk.
(d) Anomaly – A misstatement or deviation that is demonstrably not representative of
misstatements or deviations in a population.
(e) Tolerable misstatement – A monetary amount set by the auditor in respect of which the
auditor seeks to obtain an appropriate level of assurance that the monetary amount set by
the auditor is not exceeded by the actual misstatement in the population.
(f) Tolerable rate of deviation – A rate of deviation from prescribed internal control procedures
set by the auditor in respect of which the auditor seeks to obtain an appropriate level of
assurance that the rate of deviation set by the auditor is not exceeded by the actual rate of
deviation in the population.
Requirements
1. General Considerations
(a) When designing an audit sample, the auditor shall consider the purpose of the audit
procedure and the characteristics of the population from which the sample will be drawn.
(b) The auditor shall determine a sample size sufficient to reduce sampling risk to an acceptably
low level
(c) The auditor shall select items for the sample in such a way that each sampling unit in the
population has a chance of selection
(d) The auditor shall perform audit procedures, appropriate to the purpose, on each item
selected.
2. Sampling Methods
(a) Random Sampling
Random selection ensures that all items in the population or within each stratum have a
known chance of selection. It may involve use of randomnumber tables. Random sampling
includes two very popular methods which are discussed below–
(i) Simple Random Sampling: Under this method each unit of the whole population e.g.
purchase or sales invoice has an equal chance of being selected. The mechanics of selection
of items may be by choosing numbers from table of random numbers by computers or
picking up numbers randomly from a drum. It is considered that random number tables are
: 33 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
simple and easy to use and also provide assurance that the bias does not aff ect the
selection. This method is considered appropriate provided the population to be sampled
consists of reasonably similar units and fall within a reasonable range.
(ii) Stratified Sampling: This method involves dividing the whole population to be tested
in a few separate groups called strata and taking a sample from each of them. Each stratum
is treated as if it was a separate population and if proportionate of items are selected from
each of these stratum. The number of groups into which the whole population has to be
divided is determined on the basis of auditor judgment.
(b) Interval Sampling or Systematic Sampling: Systematic selection is a selection method in
which the number of sampling units in the population is divided by the sample size to give a
sampling interval, for example 50, and having determined a starting point within the first 50,
each 50th sampling unit thereafter is selected. When using systematic selection, the auditor
would need to determine that sampling units within the population are not structured in
such a way that the sampling interval corresponds with a particular pattern in the
population.
(c) Monetary Unit Sampling: It is a type of value-weighted selection in which sample size,
selection and evaluation results in a conclusion in monetary amounts.
(d) Haphazard sampling: Haphazard selection, in which the auditor selects the sample without
following a structured technique. Although no structured technique is used, the auditor
would nonetheless avoid any conscious bias or predictability (for example, always choosing
or avoiding the first or last entries on a page)
(e) Block Sampling: This method involves selection of a block(s) of contiguous items from within
the population. Block selection cannot ordinarily be used in audit sampling because most
populations are structured such that items in a sequence can be expected to have similar
characteristics to each other, but different characteristics from items elsewhere in the
population.
3. Sample Results
(a) In the extremely rare circumstances when the auditor considers a misstatement or deviation
discovered in a sample to be an anomaly, the auditor shall obtain a high degree of certainty
that such misstatement or deviation is not representative of the population
(b) The auditor shall obtain this degree of certainty by performing additional audit procedures to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the misstatement or deviation does not
affect the remainder of the population.
(c) The auditor shall project misstatements found in the sample to the population.
When a misstatement has been established as an anomaly, it may be excluded when
projecting misstatements to the population. However, the effect of any such misstatement, if
uncorrected, still needs to be considered in addition to the projection of the non-anomalous
misstatements.
(d) The auditor shall evaluate:
(a) The results of the sample; and
(b) Whether the use of audit sampling has provided a reasonable basis for conclusions
about the population that has been tested.
: 34 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 540 AUDIT EVIDENCE FOR ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND RELATED
DISCLOSURES
Objective
To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence whether in the context of the applicable financial
reporting framework:
(a) accounting estimates, including fair value accounting estimates, in the financial statements,
whether recognised or disclosed, are reasonable and
(b) related disclosures in the financial statements are adequate
Requirements
Risk assessment procedures: auditor shall obtain an understanding of the following:
(a) requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework relevant to accounting
estimates
(b) How management identifies those transactions, events and conditions that may give rise to
the need for accounting estimates
(c) make inquiries about changes in circumstances that may give rise to new, or the need to
revise existing, accounting estimates
(d) How management makes the accounting estimates, and an understanding of the data on
which they are based, including:
(i) The method, including where applicable the model, used in making the
accounting estimate;
(ii) Relevant controls;
(iii) Whether management has used an expert;
(iv) The assumptions underlying the accounting estimates;
(v) Whether there has been or ought to have been a change from the prior period
in the methods for making the accounting estimates, and if so, why; and
(vi) Whether and, if so, how management has assessed the effect of estimation
uncertainty.
Responses to the assessed Risks of Material Misstatement
(a) Test of details:
1.Whether management has appropriately applied the requirements of the applicable
financial reporting framework
2. Whether the methods for making the accounting estimates are appropriate and have been
applied consistently
3. whether changes, if any, in accounting estimates or in the method for making them from
the prior period are appropriate in the circumstances.
4. whether events occurring up to the date of the auditor’s report provide audit evidence
regarding the accounting estimate.
5. how management made the accounting estimate and the data on which it is based and test
the same
(b) Test the operating effectiveness of the controls over how management made the
accounting estimate, together with appropriate substantive procedures
(c) The auditor shall develop a point estimate or a range to evaluate management’s point
estimate taking into account relevant variables and to evaluate any significant differences
from management’s point estimate.
(d) consider whether specialised skills or knowledge in relation to one or more aspects of the
accounting estimates are required in order to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
(e) Check whether management has considered alternative assumptions or outcomes, and why
it has rejected them, or how management has otherwise addressed estimation uncertainty
in making the accounting estimate.
(f) auditor shall obtain written representations from management and, where appropriate,
those charged with governance whether they believe significant assumptions used in making
accounting estimates are reasonable.
: 35 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 550 RELATED PARTIES
1 Definition
a A related party as defined in the applicable financial reporting framework
b Where the applicable financial reporting framework establishes minimal or no
related party requirements
b-i A person or other entity that has control or significant influence, directly or
indirectly through one or more intermediaries, over the reporting entity
b-ii Another entity over which the reporting entity has control or significant influence,
directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries
b-iii Another entity that is under common control with the reporting entity through
having:
i. Common controlling ownership;
ii. Owners who are close family members; or
iii. Common key management.
Note: However, entities that are under common control by a state (i.e., a national,
regional or local government) are not considered related unless they engage in
significant transactions or share resources to a significant extent with one another.
2 Risk Assessment Procedure
a shall inquire of management regarding:
(i) The identity of the entity’s related parties, including changes from the prior
period;
(ii) The nature of the relationships between the entity and these related
parties; and
(iii) Whether the entity entered into any transactions with these related parties
during the period and, if so, the type and purpose of the transactions
b to obtain an understanding of the controls, if any, that management has
established to:
(i) Identify, account for, and disclose related party relationships and
transactions in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;
(ii) Authorise and approve significant transactions and arrangements with related
parties
c Examples of RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH RELATED PARTY RELATIONSHIP AND
TRANSACTIONS:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
3 Auditor’s Responses to the assessed Risk
a Identification of Previously Unidentified or Undisclosed Related Parties or
Significant Related Party Transactions:
During the audit, the auditor may inspect records or documents that may provide
information about related party relationships and transactions, for example:
• Entity income tax returns.
• Information supplied by the entity to regulatory authorities.
• Shareholder registers to identify the entity’s principal shareholders.
• Statements of conflicts of interest from management and those
charged with governance.
Records of the entity’s investments
: 36 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
b For identified significant related party transactions outside the entity’s normal
course of business, the auditor shall:
(a) Inspect the underlying contracts or agreements, if any, and evaluate whether:
(i) The business rationale (or lack thereof) of the transactions suggests that they
may have been entered into to engage in fraudulent financial reporting or to
conceal misappropriation of assets;
(ii) The terms of the transactions are consistent with management’s explanations
(iii) The transactions have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework; and
(b) Obtain evidence that the transactions have been appropriately authorised &
approved
c whether related party transactions are at Arm’s Length or not.
d in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework
e the auditor shall obtain written representations from management-
They have disclosed to the auditor and in the financial statements related party
relationships and transactions.
: 37 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 560 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Objective
(a) Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether events occurring
between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report
that require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements are
appropriately reflected in those financial statements; and
(b) Respond appropriately to facts that become known to the auditor after the date of
the auditor’s report, that, had they been known to the auditor at that date, may have
caused the auditor to amend the auditor’s report.
Definitions
(a) Date of the financial statements – The date of the end of the latest period covered
by the financial statements.
(b) Date of approval of the financial statements – The date on which all the statements
that comprise the financial statements, including the related notes, have been
prepared and those with the recognised authority have asserted that they have taken
responsibility for those financial statements.
(c) Date of the auditor’s report – The date the auditor dates the report on the financial
statements in accordance with SA 700.
(d) Date the financial statements are issued – The date that the auditor’s report and
audited financial statements are made available to third parties.
(e) Subsequent events – Events occurring between the date of the financial statements
and the date of the auditor’s report, and facts that become known to the auditor
after the date of the auditor’s report.
Requirements
Events Occurring Between the Date of the Financial Statements and the Date of the
Auditor’s Report
(a) Obtaining an understanding of any procedures management has established
to ensure that subsequent events are identified.
(b) Inquiring of management and, where appropriate, those charged with
governance as to whether any subsequent events have occurred which might
affect the financial statements.
(c) Reading minutes, if any, of the meetings, of the entity’s owners, management
and those charged with governance, that have been held after the date of the
financial statements
(d) Reading the entity’s latest subsequent interim financial statements, if any.
(e) Obtain written representations as per SA 580, that all events occurring
subsequent to the date of the financial statements and for which the applicable
financial reporting framework requires adjustment or disclosure have been
adjusted or disclosed.
Facts Which Become Known to the Auditor After the Date of the Auditor’s
Report but Before the Date the Financial Statements are Issued
(a) Discuss the matter with management and, where appropriate, those charged
with governance.
(b) Determine whether the financial statements need amendment and, if so,
(c) Inquire how management intends to address the matter in the financial
statements
(d) The auditor shall:
Provide a new or amended auditor’s report that includes a statement in an
Emphasis of Matter paragraph or Other Matter(s) paragraph that conveys that
: 38 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
auditor’s procedures on subsequent events are restricted solely to the
amendment of the financial statements as described in the relevant note to the
financial statements.
III. Facts Which Become Known to the Auditor After the Financial Statements
have been Issued.
(a) Discuss the matter with management and, where appropriate, those charged
with governance.
(b) Determine whether the financial statements need amendment and, if so,
(c) Inquire how management intends to address the matter in the financial
statements.
(d) If management does not take the necessary steps to ensure that anyone in
receipt of the previously issued financial statements is informed of the
situation and does not amend the financial statements in circumstances where
the auditor believes they need to be amended, If management or those
charged with governance do not take these necessary steps, the auditor shall
take appropriate action to seek to prevent reliance on the auditor’s report.
: 39 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 570 GOING CONCERN
1 Auditor’s Responsibility
to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding, and conclude on, the appropriateness of
management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial
statements, and to conclude, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty
exists about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
2 Risk Assessment Procedures
a When performing risk assessment procedures as required by SA 315, the auditor shall consider
whether events or conditions exist that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern.
b auditor shall discuss with management the basis for the intended use of the going concern
basis of accounting
3 Further Audit Procedures- Auditor’s responses to the assessed Risks
a auditor shall request management to extend its assessment period to at least twelve months
from that date
b inquire of management as to its knowledge of events or conditions beyond the period of
management’s assessment that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as
a going concern.
c Where the entity has prepared a cash flow forecast, and analysis of the forecast is a significant
factor in considering the future outcome of events or conditions in the evaluation of
management’s plans for future actions:
(i) Evaluating the reliability of the underlying data generated to prepare the forecast; and
(ii) Determining whether there is adequate support for the assumptions underlying the
forecast
d Requesting written representations from management and, where appropriate, those charged
with governance, regarding their plans for future actions and the feasibility of these plans.
4 Conclusions and Reporting- Refer Audit Report Notes
Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern We draw attention to Note XX in the financial
statements, which indicates that the Company incurred a net loss of ZZZ during the year ended
December 31, 20X1 and, as of that date, the Company’s current liabilities exceeded its total assets by
YYY. As stated in Note 6, these events or conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note XX,
indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
: 40 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 580 WRITTEN REPRESENTATION
1 Definition
A written statement by management provided to the auditor to confirm certain matters or to
support other audit evidence. Written representations in this context do not include financial
statements, the assertions therein, or supporting books and records
2 Form and Content of Written Representation
a It must be in paper form as a representation letter addressed to the auditor
b Content:
i) request management to provide a written representation that it has fulfilled its responsibility
for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework
ii) It has provided the auditor with all relevant information and access as agreed in the terms
of the audit engagement
iii) All transactions have been recorded and are reflected in the financial statements
iv) As required by Other SAs
v) As required by auditor’s judgment
c The date of the written representations shall be as near as practicable to, but not after, the
date of the auditor’s report.
3 Doubt over Reliability of Written Representation
a if written representations are inconsistent with other audit evidence, the auditor shall perform
audit procedures to attempt to resolve the matter
b If the matter remains unresolved, the auditor shall reconsider the assessment of the
competence, integrity, ethical values or diligence of management
c If the auditor concludes that the written representations are not reliable, the auditor shall take
appropriate actions, including determining the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s
report in accordance with SA 705
4 Management Refuses to provide Written Representation
(a) Discuss the matter with those charged with governance;
(b) Re-evaluate the integrity of management and evaluate the effect that this may have on the
reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general; and
(c) Take appropriate actions, including determining the possible effect on the opinion in the
auditor’s report in accordance with SA 705
: 41 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 600 USING THE WORK OF OTHER AUDITOR
1 Principal Auditor means the auditor with responsibility for reporting on the financial
information of an entity
2 Other auditor means an auditor, other than the principal auditor, with responsibility for
reporting on the financial information of a component
3 Risk Assessment procedure by Principal Auditor
(a) the materiality of the portion of the financial information which the principal auditor
audits;
(b) the principal auditor's degree of knowledge regarding the business of the components;
(c) the risk of material misstatements in the financial information of the components
audited by the other auditor; and
4 Co-ordination with Other Auditor
a advise the other auditor of the use that is to be made of the other auditor's work
b inform the other auditor of matters such as areas requiring special consideration
c advise the other auditor of the significant accounting, auditing and reporting requirements
and obtain representation as to compliance with them
d consider the significant findings of the other auditor.
e obtain representation as to compliance with them.
5 Reporting Considerations
a When the principal auditor concludes, based on his procedures, that the work of the other
auditor cannot be used and the principal auditor has not been able to perform sufficient
additional procedures regarding the financial information of the component audited by the
other auditor, the principal auditor should express a qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion
because there is a limitation on the scope of audit.
b When the principal auditor has to base his opinion on the financial information of the entity as
a whole relying upon the statements and reports of the other auditors his report should state
clearly the division of responsibility for the financial information of the entity by indicating the
extent to which the financial information of components audited by the other auditors
c In all circumstances, if the other auditor issues, or intends to issue, a modified auditor's report,
Principal auditor should evaluate materiality and then modify opinion, if required.
6 Access over working papers
Principal auditor can visit the component and review the financial information, however, he
cannot establish his right over the working papers of other auditor because working papers
are property of auditor
: 42 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 610 USING THE WORK OF INTERNAL AUDITOR
: 43 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 620 USING THE WORK OF AUDITOR’S EXPERT
1 Management’s Expert
An individual or organisation possessing expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing,
whose work in that field is used by the entity.
2 Auditor’s Expert
An individual or organisation possessing expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing,
whose work in that field is used by the auditor.
An auditor’s expert may be either an auditor’s internal expert (who is a partner or staff,
including temporary staff, of the auditor’s firm or a network firm), or an auditor’s external
expert.
3 Examples of using the work of expert
a The actuarial calculation of liabilities associated with insurance contracts or employee benefit
plans.
b The interpretation of contracts, laws and regulations.
c The analysis of complex or unusual tax compliance issues
4 Factors to be considered before determining nature timing and extent of audit procedures
(a) The nature of the matter to which that expert’s work relates;
(b) The risks of material misstatement in the matter to which that expert’s work relates;
(c) The significance of that expert’s work in the context of the audit;
(d) The auditor’s knowledge of and experience with previous work performed by that expert
(f) whether the auditor’s expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity for
the auditor’s purposes
5 Procedures to evaluate adequacy of expert’s work
(a) The relevance and reasonableness of that expert’s findings or conclusions, and their
consistency with other audit evidence;
(b) If that expert’s work involves use of significant assumptions and methods, the relevance and
reasonableness of those assumptions and methods in the circumstances
(c) If that expert’s work involves the use of source data that is significant to that expert’s work,
the relevance, completeness, and accuracy of that source data.
6 Reference to Expert’s Work in auditor’s report
(a) The auditor shall not refer to the work of an auditor’s expert in an auditor’s report containing
an unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation to do so.
(b) If the auditor makes reference to the work of an auditor’s expert in the auditor’s report
because such reference is relevant to an understanding of a modification to the auditor’s
opinion, the auditor shall indicate in the auditor’s report that such reference does not reduce
the auditor’s responsibility for that opinion.
: 44 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SA 800 Series..
1. The Standards on Auditing (SAs) in the 200-700 series apply to an audit of
financial statements prepared for general purpose i.e balance sheet/P&L
prepared as per generally accepted financial reporting framework.
2. This set of SA deals with special considerations in the application of 200-700
series SAs to an audit of financial statements
3. Following must be noted for applicability of SA 800/805/810:
a. SA 800: This SA is written in the context of a complete set of financial
statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework.
Example: preparing financial statements as per provisions of contract or as
required for complying with regulator.
b. SA 805: This SA deals with special considerations in the application of
those SAs to an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific
element, account or item of a financial statement. Example, A schedule of
net tangible assets, including related notes.
c. SA 810: This Standard on Auditing (SA) deals with the auditor’s
responsibilities when undertaking an engagement to report on summary
financial statements derived from financial statements audited in
accordance with SAs usually done by that same auditor
4. These standards do not over ride the requirements of other standards i.e. other
standards are to be considered for auditing financial statements under special
purpose framework or reporting upon summary of financial statements
5. Procedures under SA 800:
a. Obtain understanding of the purpose for which financial statements have
been prepared, intended users and steps taken by management that AFRF
is acceptable
b. Obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of
accounting policies
c. The auditor’s report on special purpose financial statements shall include
an -Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that
the financial statements are prepared in accordance with a special purpose
framework and that, as a result, the financial statements may not be
suitable for another purpose
6. Procedures under SA 805:
a. In the case of an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific
element of a financial statement, other SAs shall be observed irrespective
of whether the auditor is also engaged to audit the entity’s complete set of
financial statements
b. If the auditor undertakes an engagement to report on a single financial
statement or on a specific element of a financial statement in conjunction
with an engagement to audit the entity’s complete set of financial
statements, the auditor shall express a separate opinion for each
engagement
c. The relevance of each of the SAs requires careful consideration. Even
when only a specific element of a financial statement is the subject of the
audit, SAs such as SA 240, SA 550, and SA 570 are, in principle, relevant.
: 45 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
7. Procedures under SA 810:
a. The auditor shall, ordinarily, accept an engagement to report on summary
financial statements in accordance with this SA only when the auditor has
been engaged to conduct an audit in accordance with SAs of the financial
statements from which the summary financial statements are derived
b. Obtain agreement from the management for its responsibility of preparing
and presenting summary financial statements
c. Evaluate whether the summary financial statements adequately disclose
their summarised nature and identify the audited financial statements.
d. Evaluate whether the summary financial statements adequately disclose
the applied criteria.
e. Compare the summary financial statements with the related information in
the audited financial statements for inconsistency, if any.
f. Phrases for reporting
(i) The summary financial statements are consistent, in all material
respects, with the audited financial statements, in accordance with
[the applied criteria]
(ii) The summary financial statements are a fair summary of the audited
financial statements, in accordance with [the applied criteria]
: 46 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SRE 2400: ENGAGEMENTS TO REVIEW HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
: 47 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SRE 2410: REVIEW OF INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION
: 48 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SAE 3400: EXAMINATION OF PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
: 49 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SAE 3402- ASSURANCE ON CONTROLS AT SERVICE ORGANISATION
: 50 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SAE 3420: ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS TO REPORT ON COMPILATION OF PRO
FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN A PROSPECTUS
: 51 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SRS 4400 AGREED UPON PROCEDURES
: 52 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SRS 4410 ENGAGEMENTS TO COMPILE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1 It deals with the practitioner’s responsibilities when engaged to assist management with the
preparation and presentation of financial information and also non-financial information
2 It does not require the practitioner to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information
provided by management for the compilation, or otherwise to gather evidence to express an
audit opinion or a review conclusion on the preparation of the financial information.
3 Practitioner should apply accounting and financial reporting expertise to assist management.
4 Comply with ethical requirements (independence not required)
5 Quality control as per SQC-1 continues to apply
6 Matters to be agreed include the following
a neither an audit nor a review will be carried out and that accordingly no assurance will be
expressed
b engagement cannot be relied upon to disclose fraud or defalcations
c Nature of the information to be supplied by the client
d Intended use and distribution of the information, once compiled
e Basis of accounting on which financial information is to be compiled
f management is responsible to the users for the information to be compiled by the accountant
7 If the accountant becomes aware that the information is incorrect or unsatisfactory, the
accountant should consider performing additional procedures
8 If the accountant becomes aware of material misstatements, he should persuade the
management to carry out necessary amendments. If it is not done and the financial statements
are still considered to be misleading, the accountant should withdraw from the engagement
9 The financial statements or other financial information compiled by the accountant should
contain a reference such as “Unaudited,” “Compiled without Audit or Review” and also “Refer
to Compilation Report” on each page of the financial information or on the front of the
complete set of financial statements.
: 53 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
SQC 1 QUALITY CONTROL FOR FIRMS THAT PERFORM AUDITS AND REVIEWS OF
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION, AND OTHER ASSURANCE AND RELATED
SERVICES ENGAGEMENTS
Objective
(a) The purpose of this Standard on Quality Control (SQC) is to establish standards and provide
guidance regarding a firm’s responsibilities for its system of quality control for audits and
reviews of historical financial information, and for other assurance and related services
engagements. This SQC applies to all firms.
Definitions
(a) Engagement documentation- record of work performed
(b) Engagement partner- SA 220
(c) Engagement quality control review- SA 220
(d) Engagement quality control reviewer- SA 220
(e) Engagement team- SA 220
(f) Suitably qualified external person- SA 220
Requirements
(a) Elements of a System of Quality Control
(b) Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the Firm
(c) Ethical Requirements
(d) Independence
(e) Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Specific Engagements
(f) Human Resources
(g) Assignment of Engagement Teams
(h) Engagement Performance
(i) Consultation
(j) Differences of Opinion
(k) Engagement Documentation
(l) Monitoring
: 54 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
Introduction
This chapter governs the code of conduct of the members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India. It is based upon the following:
a) Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Schedules thereto (First and Second Schedule)
b) Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988
c) Council General Guidelines, 2008
d) Decisions of ethical standard board
The discussions in this chapter are broadly divided into following
1) Schedules to the Act- 2 Schedules with 34 clauses
2) Other provisions
Important Terms
: 56 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
Disciplinary Mechanism
Provisions of the Chartered Accountant, Act, 1949 regarding (i) Disciplinary Directorate, (ii) Board
of Discipline, (iii) Disciplinary Committee, (iv) Appellate Authority and procedure in enquiries for
disciplinary matters relating to misconduct of the members of the Institute are as hereunder:
: 57 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
First Schedule
: 58 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
7 Advertising -Advertises his professional attainments or services, or
professional -uses any designation or expressions other than the Chartered
attainments Accountant on professional documents, visiting cards, letter heads or
sign boards unless it be a degree of a University established by law in
India or recognized by the Central Government or a title indicating
membership of the Institute of Chartered Accountants or of any other
institution that has been recognized by the Central Government or may
be recognized by the Council.
Provided that a member in practice may advertise through a write up,
setting out the service provided by him or his firm and particulars of his
firm subject to such guidelines as may be issued by the Council.
8 Communication with accepts a position as auditor previously held by another chartered
previous auditor accountant or a certified auditor who has been issued certificate under
the Restricted Certificate Rules, 1932 without first communicating with
him in writing.
9 Compliance with SEC Accepts an appointment as auditor of a company without first
139, 140,141 & 142 ascertaining from it whether the requirements of Section 225 of the
of companies act, Companies Act, 1956, in respect of such appointment have been duly
2013 complied with (now Section 139, 140 and 142 read with Section 141 of
the Companies Act, 2013).
10 Performance or Charges or offers to charge, accepts or offers to accept in respect of any
Percentage based professional employment fees which are based on a percentage of
fees profits or which are contingent upon the findings, or results of such
employment,
except as permitted under any regulations made under this Act.
11 Engaging in other Engages in any business or occupation other than the profession of
occupation chartered accountant unless permitted by the Council so to engage.
Provided that nothing contained herein shall disentitle a chartered
accountant from being a director of a company (Not being managing
director or a whole time director) unless he or any of his partners is
interested in such company as an auditor.
12 Signing by others Allows a person not being a member of the institute in practice or a
member not being his partner to sign on his behalf or on behalf of his
firm, any balance sheet, profit and loss account, report or financial
statements.
: 59 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
: 61 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
auditor.
The letter should merely set out in a dignified manner how he has been acting independently
and conscientiously through the term of office and may, in addition, indicate his willingness to
continue as auditor if re appointed by the shareholders.
J. Acceptance of original professional work by a member emanating from the client
Introduced to him by another member
The Council has decided that a member should not accept the original professional work
emanating from a client introduced to him by another member.
If any professional work of such client comes to him directly, it should be his duty to ask the
client that he should come through the other member dealing generally with his original work.
K. Giving public Interviews
it should not result in publicity.
he should not handover his profile and ask the presenter to read profile.
should not mention association with firm and nature of services.
L. Website
i) No restriction on design and colour
ii) Pull model and not push model
iii) may provide a link to the Website of:
a) ICAI,
b) its Regional Councils and Branches
c) Govt./Govt. Departments/Regulatory authorities
d) other Professional Bodies, such as, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA), the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England & Wales (ICAEW) and The Canadian
Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA).
iv) allowed to provide following information:
a) Member/Trade/Firm name.
b) Year of establishment
c) Member/Firm’s Address (both Head Office and Branches)
d) Nature of services rendered (to be displayable only on specific “pull” request)
e) Details of Partners
f) Details of Employees
g) No. of articled clerks. (to be displayable only on specific “pull” request).
h) Job vacancies for the Chartered Accountant/firm of Chartered Accountants (including
articleship).
i) Nature of assignments handled
j) Disclosure of names of clients and/or fees charged, on the website is permissible only where
it is required by a regulator, whether or not constituted under a statute, in India or outside
India, provided that such disclosure is only to the extent of requirement of the regulator.
k) articles, professional information, professional updation
l) bulletin boards
m) chat rooms can be provided which permit chatting amongst members of the ICAI and
between Firms and its clients
n) can provide on line advice to their clients
o) listing on suitable search engine should be permitted
v) mention the date upto which it is updated
vi) THE ICAI LOGO ONLY
(use of logo/monogram of any kind/form/style/design/colour, etc. whatsoever on any display
material or media is prohibited. Use/printing of member/firm name in any other manner
amounting to logo/monogram was also prohibited).
vii) Display of passport size photograph only
viii) permitted to have their Webpages in their trade name or individual name.
ix) Website name should not solicit client
x) Do not issue any circular or any other advertisement or any other material of any kind
whatsoever by virtue of which they solicit people to visit their Website. However, permitted to
mention their Website address on their professional stationery
: 62 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
xi) No Advertisement of any other nature permitted on the website
xii) Can register on websites providing platforms to professionals for providing consultancy
services. Allowed to designate as “CA” and mention name of the firm.
Professional achievements, Contact address and name of the firm with suffix “CA” not allowed.
7 Use of degree/designation- Sec 7 of CA Act, 1949 -The member of the Institute are now permitted
to use the word 'CA' as prefix before their name irrespective of the fact that they are in practice or
not.
a) CA in Practice
Must use designation “Chartered Accountant”
Cannot use any other designation
Can mention degrees from universities recognised by law in India or recognised by Central
Government.
may use any other letters or description indicating membership of Accountancy Bodies which
have been approved by the Council or of bodies other than Accountancy Institutes.
Members of the Institute in practice who are otherwise eligible may practice as advocates
subject to the permission of the Bar Council. Use of designation as follows:
-For Advocacy matters- Cannot use designation “Chartered Accountant”
-For other matters- Continue to use designation “Chartered Accountant”
-Cannot use CA and Lawyers simultaneously (together in one visiting card).
b) Not in Practice
Can use any other designation provided they are not using designation Chartered Accountant.
Note: Practicing CA using Associates of ‘Correspondents of... etc. on letter heads, visiting cards
etc. of firms of Chartered Accountants:
The Council has not barred entering into such association and the restriction given under the
above clause is to bar an advertisement appearing / derived from such associations
8 Additional points for clause 7 Part I first Schedule:
a) The date of setting up the practice by a member or the date of establishment of the firm on
the letterheads and other professional documents, etc. should not be mentioned. However in the
Website, the year of establishment can be given on the specific “pull” request.
c) not permissible for the chartered accountants in practice to print their photograph on their
visiting cards
d) allowed to print Quick Response Code (QR Code) on the visiting Card, provided that the Code
does not contain information that is not otherwise permissible to be printed on a visiting Card
e) Exemption:
(a) Advertisements for recruiting staff in the members’ own office.
(b) Advertisements inserted on behalf of clients requiring staff or wishing to acquire or dispose of
business or property.
(c) Advertisement for the sale of a business or property by a member acting in a professional
capacity as trustee, liquidator or receiver
f) Notice in the press relating to the success in an examination of an individual candidate:
The candidate’s name and address, school and local background, examinations passed with details
of any prize or place gained, the name of the principal, firm and town in which the principal
practices may be published.
g) reports and certificates issued are limited to what is necessary.
h) The Members may advertise through a write up setting out their particulars or of their firms
and services provided by them. (cannot publish in mass media but can be circulated amongst
clients and as a response to enquiries)
9 Clause 8 Part I first Schedule working:
a) applies to all types of audit where previous auditor was a CA.
b) Communication must be sent by the proposed auditor before accepting the engagement
c) Proposed auditor should have a proof of delivery- either handwritten acknowledgement or
sending letter through Registered A.D (acknowledgment due) Post.
d) if retiring auditor does not reply within reasonable time then proposed auditor can give a
conditional acceptance after verifying whether there are such reasons for not accepting audit.
e) if retiring auditor replies and it has following reasons mentioned then proposed auditor cannot
: 63 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
accept audit:
a) Non compliance with Sec 139, 140, 141 and 142 of Companies Act, 2013)
b) Non-payment of undisputed audit fees by auditees other than in case of sick units for carrying
out the statutory audit under the Companies Act or various other statutes
10 Regulation 192 of CA Regulations, 1988- Exceptions:
(a) “In the case of a receiver or a liquidator, the fees may be based on a percentage of the
realization or disbursement of the assets;
(b) In the case of an auditor of a co-operative society, the fees may be based on a percentage of
the paid up capital or the working capital or the gross or net income or profits;
(c) In the case of a valuer for the purposes of direct taxes and duties, the fees may be based on a
percentage of the value of property valued;
(d) in the case of certain management consultancy services as may be decided by the resolution of
the Council from time to time, the fees may be based on percentage basis which may be
contingent upon the findings, or results of such work;
(e) in the case of certain fund raising services, the fees may be based on a percentage of the fund
raised;
(f) in the case of debt recovery services, the fees may be based on a percentage of the debt
recovered;
(g) in the case of services related to cost optimisation, the fees may be based on a percentage of
the benefit derived; and
(h) any other service or audit as may be decided by the Council
11 Resolutions of the council permitting to engage in other professions (CA REGULATIONS, 1988)
1) General Resolution
Permission granted generally - Members of the Institute in practice be generally permitted to
engage in the following categories of occupations, for which no specific permission from the
Council would be necessary in individual cases:
(1) Employment under Chartered Accountants in practice or firms of such chartered accountants.
(2) Private tutorship.
(3) Authorship of books and articles.
(4) Holding of Life Insurance Agency License for the limited purpose of getting renewal
commission.
(5) Attending classes and appearing for any examination.
(6) Holding of public elective offices such as M.P., M.L.A. and M.L.C.
(7) Honorary office leadership of charitable-educational or other non-commercial organisations.
(8) Acting as Notary Public, Justice of the Peace, Special Executive Magistrate and the like.
(9) Part-time tutorship under the coaching organisation of the Institute.
(10) Valuation of papers, acting as paper-setter, head-examiner or a moderator, for any
examination.
(11) Editorship of professional journals.
(12) Acting as Surveyor and Loss Assessor under the Insurance Act, 1938 provided they are
otherwise eligible.
(13) Acting as recovery consultant in the banking sector
(14) Owning agricultural land and carrying out agricultural activity
2) Specific Resolution
Members of the Institute in practice may engage in the following categories of business or
occupations, after obtaining the specific and prior approval of the Council in each case:
(1) Full-time or part-time employment in business concerns provided that the member and/or his
relatives do not hold “substantial interest” in such concerns.
(2) Full-time or part-time employment in non-business concern.
(3) Office of managing director or a whole-time director of a body corporate within the meaning of
the Companies Act, 1956 (now Companies Act, 2013).
(4) Interest in family business concerns (including such interest devolving on the members as a
result of inheritance / succession / partition of the family business) or concerns in which interest
has been acquired as a result of relationships and in the management of which no active part is
taken.
: 64 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
(5) Interest in an educational institution.
(6) Part-time or full-time lectureship for courses other than those relating to the Institute’s
examinations conducted under the auspices of the Institute or the Regional councils or their
branches.
(7) Part-time or full-time tutorship under any educational institution other than the coaching
organization of the Institute.
(8) Editorship of journals other than professional journals.
(9) Any other business or occupation for which the Executive Committee considers that permission
may be granted.
: 65 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
Fellow Member: The name of following types of members shall be entered into the Register
as a Fellow of the Institute, on payment of such fees along with the application made and
granted in the prescribed manner-
(i) An associate member who has been in continuous practice in India for at least 5 years,
(ii) A member who has been an associate for a continuous period of not less than 5 years and
who possess such qualifications as may be prescribed by the Council with a view to ensuring
that he has experience equivalent to the experience normally acquired as a result of
continuous practice for a period of 5 years as a Chartered Accountant.
2 For Clause 2
Read with clause 3 Part II Second Schedule to CA Act, 1949
Second Schedule
Part I: CA in Practice + Professional Misconduct
Clause Key Phrase Bare Clause
No.
1 Client Discloses Information acquired in the course of his professional
Confidentiality engagement to any person other than his client so engaging him
without the consent of his client or otherwise than as required by
any law for the time being in force.
2 Certification without If he certifies or submits in his name or in the name of his firm, a
: 66 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
examination report of an examination of financial statements unless the
examination of such statements and the related records has been
made by him or by a partner or an employee In his firm or by
another chartered accountant in practice.
3 Vouching for the Permits his name or the name of his firm to be used in connection
accuracy of the with an estimate of earnings contingent upon future transactions in
forecast manner which may lead to the belief that he vouches for the
accuracy of the forecast.
4 Expressing opinion Expresses his opinion on financial statements of any business or
where substantial enterprise in which he, his firm, or a partner in his firm has a
interest is involved substantial interest.
5 Knowingly fails to fails to disclose a material fact known to him which is not disclosed
disclose material in a financial statement, but disclosure of which is necessary in
fact making such financial statement not misleading where he is
concerned with that financial statement in a professional capacity.
6 Knowingly fails to Fails to report a material misstatement known to him to appear in a
report material financial statement with which he is concerned in a professional
misstatement capacity.
7 Gross negligence does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the
conduct of his professional duties.
8 Failure to obtain Fails to obtain sufficient information which is necessary for
sufficient expression of an opinion or
information its exceptions are sufficiently material to negate the expression of
an opinion.
9 Material departure Fails to invite attention to any material departure from the
from standard generally accepted procedure of audit applicable to the
auditing practices circumstances.
10 Misappropriating fails to keep moneys of his client other than fees or remuneration
client’s money or money meant to be expended in a separate banking account or
to use such moneys for purposes for which they are intended within
a reasonable time.
: 67 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
believe that forecast is accurate and results are expected to be achieved
3 For Clause 4
a) Assignment involves expressing an opinion on Financial Statements
i) Client= Company
Person Partner Firm Relative holding securities but not a substantial interest:
Not Guilty under Clause 4 Part I Second schedule but check disqualification u/s 141(3) of
companies act, 2013 in case of statutory audit
Person Partner Firm Relative holding substantial interest:
Guilty under Clause 4 Part I Second schedule and disqualification u/s 141(3) of companies
act, 2013 in case of statutory audit
ii) Client= Other than Company
Check substantial interest of the person partner firm or relative in the entity + applicable
laws and regulations before accepting the assignment.
b) Any other assignment e.g. consultancy, tax representation
Clause 4 is not applicable.
4 For Clause 5 & 6
Knowingly fails to
disclose/report
Material
Material fact not
Misstatement
appearing in financial
appearing in the
statements
financial statements
5 For Clause 10
Money Recd
from Client
Towards
Client's money professional
fees
: 68 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
provisions there under or any guidelines issued by the Council.
2 Employer’s being an employee of any company, firm or person, discloses
confidentiality confidential information acquired in the course of his employment
except as and when required by any law for the time being in force or
except as permitted by the employer.
3 Incorrect Includes in any information, statement, return or form to be submitted
information to to the Institute, Council or any of its Committees, Director (Discipline),
the ICAI,etc.. Board of Discipline. Disciplinary Committee, Quality Review Board or the
Appellate Authority any particulars knowing them to be false.
4 Defalcation of Defalcates or embezzles money received in his professional capacity.
cash in
professional
capacity
Part III : Other Misconduct
Clause Key Phrase Bare Clause
No.
1 Imprisonment A member of the Institute, whether in practice or not, shall be deemed
exceeding 6 to be guilty of other misconduct, if he is held guilty by any civil or
months criminal court for an offence which is punishable with imprisonment for
a term exceeding six months.
: 69 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
on the Register.
6 Restoration of Refer WN1
membership
7 Cancellation of a Certificate of Practice (COP) shall be liable for
COP cancellation, if:
(i) the name of the holder of the certificate is removed from the Register; or
(ii) the Council is satisfied, after giving an opportunity of being heard to
the person concerned, that such certificate was issued on the basis of
incorrect,
misleading or false information, or by mistake or inadvertence; or
(iii) a member has ceased to practise; or
(iv) a member has not paid annual fee for certificate of practice till 30th
day of September of the relevant year.
Where a COP is cancelled, the holder shall surrender the same to the
Secretary.
8 Disabilities for Section 8 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949:
the purpose of (i) If he has not attained the age of 21 years at the time of his application; or
Membership (Sec (ii) If he is adjudged as person of unsound mind; or
8) (iii) If he is an undischarged insolvent; or
(iv) If he, being a discharged insolvent, has not obtained from the court a
certificate stating that his insolvency was caused by misfortune without any
misconduct on his part; or
(v) If he has been convicted by a competent Court whether within or without
India,
- of an offence involving moral turpitude and punishable with transportation
or imprisonment or
- of an offence, not of a technical nature, committed by him in his professional
capacity
unless
-in respect of the offence committed he has either been granted a pardon or,
-on an application made by him in this behalf, the Central Government has, by
an order in writing, removed the disability; or
(vi) If he has been removed from membership of the Institute on being found
on inquiry to have been guilty of professional or other misconduct
9 KYC NORMS Refer note amended as per May 18 RTP
10 Tax Audit 60 tax audit assignments per partner in the firm.
Assignments According to a clarification on Tax Audit Assignments by
Committee on Ethical Standards Board) of the Institute,
if there are 10 partners in a firm of Chartered Accountants in practice, then all
the partners of the firm can collectively sign 600 tax audit reports. This
maximum limit of 600 tax audit assignments may be distributed between the
partners in any manner whatsoever. For instance, 1 partner can individually
sign 600 tax audit reports in case remaining 9 partners are not signing any tax
audit report.
11 Statutory Audit- In case of Public Sector Undertaking(s)/ Government Company(ies)/Listed
Special Company(ies) and other Public Company(ies) having turnover of ` 50 crores
consideration or more, A member of the Institute in practice shall not accept the
appointment as statutory auditor if he accepts any other work(s) or
assignment(s) or service(s) on a remuneration which in total exceeds the fee
payable for carrying out the statutory audit of the same
Undertaking/company.
12 Ratio between In the Council‟s view, a practicing firm of Chartered Accountants
Qualified and engaged in audit work should have at least one member
Unqualified Staff for every five non-qualified members of the staff, excluding articled and audit
clerks, typists, peons and other persons not engaged directly in such
: 70 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
professional work
13 Indebtedness A member of the Institute in practice or a partner of a firm in
As per council practice or a firm shall not accept appointment as auditor of a concern while
Guidelines indebted to the concern or given any guarantee or provided any security in
connection with the indebtedness of any third person to the concern,
for limits fixed in the statute and in other cases for amount exceeding `
10,000/-
14 Companies not to Section 25 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 provides that:
Engage in (1) No company, whether incorporated in India or elsewhere, shall practise as
Accountancy chartered accountants.
Here, the term “company” shall include any limited liability partnership which
has company as its partner for the purpose of this section.
In addition, as per section 141(2) of the Companies Act, 2013,
where a firm (including a limited liability partnership) is appointed as an auditor
of a company, then, only the partners who are chartered accountants shall be
authorised to act and sign on behalf of the firm.
On thoroughly studying the provisions of both the Acts, the LLPs,
though allowed to be appointed as an auditor
in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013, however, it can’t be engaged into
practice, if it has company as its partner, as per the Chartered Accountants Act,
1949.
Therefore, in short, the LLP not having any company as its partner, can be
engaged into practicing and thus take audit assignments.
15 Maintenance of if a Chartered Accountant in practice or a Firm of Chartered Accountants has
Branch office- more than one office in India, each one of such offices should be in the separate
Section 27 of charge of a member of the Institute.
Chartered exemption has been given to members practicing in hill areas:
Accountants Act, a) open temporary offices in a city in the plains for a limited period
1949 not exceeding 3 months in a year
b) name board of the firm in the temporary office should not be displayed at
times other than the period such office is permitted to function as above
c) temporary office should not be mentioned in the letterheads, visiting cards
or any other documents as a place of business of the member/firm
d) Inform the ICAI before opening and closing such office.
General Exemption:
(a) the second office is located in the same premises, in which the first office is
located or,
(b) the second office is located in the same city, in which the first office is
located or,
(c) the second office is located within a distance of 50 km. from the municipal
limits of a city, in which the first office is located.
Chartered Accountant in-charge of the branch of another firm should be
associated with him or with the firm either as a partner or as a paid assistant.
If he is a paid assistant, he must be in whole time employment with him.
16 Maintenance of As per Council General Guidelines, 2008.
Books of A member of the Institute in practice or the firm of Chartered Accountants of
Accounts which he is a partner, shall maintain and keep in respect of his / its
professional practice, proper books of account including the following- (i) a
Cash Book; (ii) a Ledger.
17 Significance of (i) Once the person concerned becomes a member of the Institute, he is
Certificate of bound by the provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act and its Regulations.
Practice If and when he appears before the Income-tax Tribunal as an Income-tax
representative after having become a member of the Institute, he could so
appear only in his capacity as a Chartered Accountant and a member of the
Institute. Having, as it were, brought himself within the jurisdiction of the
: 71 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
Chartered Accountants Act and its Regulations, he could not set them at
naught by contending that even though he continues to be a member of the
Institute and has been punished by suspension from practice as a member, he
would be entitled, in substance, to practice in some other capacity.
(ii) A member of the Institute can have no other capacity in which he can take
up such practice, separable from his capacity to practice as a member of the
Institute.
18 Regulation 47 of Premium from Articled Assistant :
CA Regulations, CA in practice should not accept premium from articled assistant in lieu of
1988 providing article training.
19 Minimum Audit Minimum audit fees circular issued by the ICAI is recommendatory and not
Fees to be mandatory.
charged However audit fees charged should not amount to undercutting leading to
solicitation
20 Penalties u/s 24 Section 24 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 provides that any person
for falsely who
claiming to be a (i) not being a member of the Institute;
member. (a) represents that he is a member of the Institute; or
(b) uses the designation Chartered Accountant;
(ii) being a member of the Institute, but not having a certificate of practice,
represents that he is in practice or practices as a Chartered Accountant, shall
be punishable on first conviction with fine which may extend to ` 1000, and on
any subsequent conviction with imprisonment which may extend to 6 months
or with fine which may extend to ` 5,000, or with both.
21 ESB Dsecision A Chartered Accountant in practice may be an equity research adviser, but he
cannot publish retail report, as it would amount to other business or
occupation.
22 ESB Decision A Chartered Accountant, who is a member of a Trust, cannot be the auditor of
the said trust.
23 ESB Decision A Chartered Accountant in practice may engage himself as Registration
Authority (RA) for obtaining digital signatures for clients
24 ESB Decision A Chartered accountant can hold the credit card of a bank when he is also the
auditor of the bank, provided the outstanding balance on the said card does
not exceed Rs 10000 beyond the prescribed credit period limit on credit card
given to him.
25 ESB Decision A Chartered Accountant in practice can act as mediator in Court, since acting
as a “mediator” would be deemed to be covered within the meaning of
“arbitrator’; which is inter-alia permitted to members in practice as per
Regulation 191 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988
26 ESB Decision A Chartered Accountant in practice is not permitted to accept audit
assignment of a bank in case he has taken loan against a Fixed Deposit held by
him in that bank.
27 ESB Decision The Ethical Standards Board in 2013 generally apply the stipulations contained
in the then amended Rule 11U of Income Tax generally, wherein statutory
auditor /tax auditor cannot be the valuer of unquoted equity shares of the
same entity.
The Board has at its recent Meeting (January, 2017) has reviewed the above,
and decided that where law prohibits for instance in the Income Tax Act and
the rules framed there under, such prohibition on statutory auditor/tax
auditor to be the valuer will continue, but where there is no specific
restriction under any law, the said eventuality will be permissible, subject to
compliance with the provisions, as contained in the Code of Ethics relating to
independence.
28 ESB Decision The Ethical Standards Board had in 2011 decided that it is not permissible for
: 72 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19
J. K. SHAH CLASSES FINAL CA – AUDIT
a member who has been Director of a Company, upon resignation from the
Company to be appointed as an auditor of the said Company, and the cooling
period for the same may be 2 years.
The Board has at its recent Meeting (January, 2017) has reviewed the above,
and noted that the Section 141 of Companies Act, 2013 on disqualification of
auditors does not mention such prohibition; though threats pertaining to the
said eventuality have been mentioned in Code of Ethics.
Further, the Board was of the view that a member may take decision in such
situation based on the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 and provisions of
Code of Ethics.
29 ESB Decision A chartered accountant in practice cannot become Financial Advisors and
receive fees/commission from Financial Institutions such as Mutual Funds,
Insurance Companies, NBFCs etc.
30 ESB Decision A chartered accountant cannot exercise lien over the client documents/
records for non-payment of his fees.
31 ESB Decision It is not permissible for CA Firm to print its vision and values behind the
visiting cards, as it would result in solicitation and therefore would be violative
of the provisions of Clause (6) of Part-I of First Schedule to the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949.
32 ESB Decision It is not permissible for chartered accountants in practice to take agencies of
UTI, GIC or NSDL.
33 ESB Decision It is permissible for a member in practice to be a settlor of a trust.
34 ESB Decision A member in practice cannot hold Customs Brokers Licence under section 146
of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations,
2013 in terms of the provisions of Code of Ethics. Act, 1962 read with Customs
Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 in terms of the provisions of code of
ethics.
35 ESB Decision A Chartered accountant in service may appear as tax representative before
tax authorities on behalf of his employer, but not on behalf of other
employees of the employer.
36 ESB Decision A chartered accountant who is the statutory auditor of a bank cannot for the
same financial year accept stock audit of the same branch of the bank or any
of the branches of the same bank or sister concern of the bank, for the same
financial year.
37 ESB Decision A CA Firm which has been appointed as the internal auditor of a PF Trust by a
Government Company cannot be appointed as its Statutory Auditor.
38 ESB Decision A concurrent auditor of a bank ‘X’ cannot be appointed as statutory auditor of
bank ‘Y’, which is sponsored by ‘X’.
39 ESB Decision A CA/CA Firm can act as the internal auditor of a company & statutory auditor
of its employees PF Fund under the new Companies Act (2013).
40 ESB Decision The Ethical Standards Board while noting that there is requirement for a
Director u/s 149(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 to reside in India for a
minimum period of 182 days in the previous calendar year, decided that such
a Director would be within the scope of Director Simplicitor (which is
generally permitted as per ICAI norms), if he is non – executive director,
required in the Board Meetings only, and not paid any remuneration except
for attending such Board Meetings.
: 73 :
REVISION NOTES – MAY ‘19