Lesson Week Reflection
Lesson Week Reflection
Based on the information above, there are a total of 18 students, 16 students were present
the day this formative assessment was given. The students were asked two questions and they
were graded on how well they could answer and discuss the question. The formative
assessment/scoring guide was worth a total of 2 points, 1 point for each question. Based off the
16 students who were present, 12 students received full points and 4 students received 1 point
out of 2 points. I would use the results and information for the next day by connecting their prior
knowledge from the lesson prior with the new information and content from the current day.
Based off the article Are You Tapping into Prior Knowledge Often Enough in Your Classroom?,
it talks about the psychologist Jean Piaget and how he felt about education. The article states
“Learners make sense of their experiences (and learning) using their own schema” (Alber, 2011).
This statement means that students learn best when they use their prior knowledge and make
connections between their prior knowledge and new knowledge. This is important for teachers to
incorporate in the classroom because students should be able to make connections every day in
the classroom.
Science
This formative assessment was done on the same day as the language arts and social
studies formative assessment. Because this was done on the same day, the same two students
were absent making it 16 students being assessed instead of 18 students. This assessment was
worth a total of three points, one point for each area that the student could sort (size, color and
texture). Out of 16 students, there were 10 students who received all 3 points, four students who
received 2 points and two students who received 1 point. I used the following results and the
sorting concept in other areas because the students were learning sorting in different content
areas and I simply connected their prior knowledge to what they already learned to the new
information they learned during the science center sorting activity. After viewing the results, I
was impressed with the results and surprised at some. I expected the results from some students
in which they received but I also expected some of the student who did not receive full points to
receive them. I also felt this way because sorting has been something that the students were
working with in not only science but math as well. Overall, this activity gave me insight on
which students understand the concept of sorting and how to sort and which students are still
having some struggles and need to be addressed and shown more examples.
Math
4 points 4 points
Janero Anderson * 12, 14, 15, 13 + 5/8
Janiyah Anderson * 13, 12, 15, 14 + 4/8
Rayyan Asif ABSENT ABSENT ABSENT
Xander Beaver * * + 8/8
Michael Bradley * * + 8/8
Billy Bratsveen * 13, 14, 15, 10 + 6/8
Elijah Chovan * * + 8/8
Nathan Cox * * + 8/8
Jake Derstine 16, 14, 12, 13 12, 13, 15, 14 + 3/8
Tessa Flesher 7, 13, 14, 15 14, 13, 15, 12 + 4/8
Malea Greenwalt 10, 12, 14, 15 13, 12, 14, 15 + 5/8
Gabriel Jonda * * + 8/8
Keyvan Martinez * 14, 13, 12, 15 + 6/8
Hannah Mayeux * * + 8/8
Aidan Schmidt * * + 8/8
Lilly Snyder * * + 8/8
Marquis Stephenson * * + 8/8
Paul Venegas-Ruiz * * + 8/8
This math formative assessment was done on a different day than the other two formative
assessments including language arts/social studies and science. Out of a total of 18 students,
there was one student absent making the total 17 students. Out of the 17 students who were
assessed, 10 of the 17 students received all 8 points, two students received 6 out of 8 points, two
students received 5 out of 8 points, two students received 4 out of 8 points and one student
received 3 out of 8 points. After looking at the results of each student, it was shown that about
half of the students knew how to both orally say the number of dots on the double ten-frame card
as well as place the cards in order from least to greatest on a pocket chart. I used the results for a
later math lesson in which the students had to do almost the same concept but in a different way.
This helped the students understand more of how to count the dots quicker (10 and some 1s) as
well as place the cards in the correct order by visually seeing the number of dots faster. After
reviewing this information and the new tricks, there were a few students who caught on quickly
and was able to count the dots quicker than the previous math lesson and assessment. Based off
the results, I expected them to be how they were because the students who did not receive full
points are mostly the struggling students of the class and need more support and assistance when
When reflecting on the feedback I provided to the two students I chose to observe, I feel
that it was effective for one of the students and not so much the other student when it pertains to
their learning. The one student is a struggling student in the class and sometimes has a hard time
focusing in class and on her assignments/activities. I believe that my feedback was effective in
some content with my other student because he has shown times when he took my feedback and
applied it to his learning as well as different behavior management and learning strategies. For
example, during the other math lesson that we did after the lesson I taught, he performed better
on putting numbers from least to greatest because he used the 10 and more 1s strategy when
counting the dots on each double ten-frame card during the activity. I noticed that my other
student did not use any strategy and was distracted still during instruction or paying attention to
something other than the teacher and what is going on around her in the lesson. I helped students
use this feedback by repeating the different strategies and reminding them of how they should be
completing their work. During different lessons, one of the concrete ways I used for the students
to stay on task and complete their work after carpet time was using the turn-and-talk strategy. In
the kindergarten class I am in, turn-and-talks are very popular because when the students discuss
with both the teacher and the students, they are more aware and understanding of what they are
going to get done rather than only knowing in their head and forgetting by the time they get to
their seat. Another strategy I used during my lessons was “status of the class”. My resource
teacher taught me the importance of status of the class and different ways that it can be done.
The way I did status of the class was I made a handout with all the students names on it and had
columns stating what I was asking the students and boxes for each student’s response. This
helped me, and the student know what they were doing and what I expected of them because I
After making my assessments and thinking about how I was going to give back feedback,
I learned how important it is to make sure my learning objectives for the students align with my
assessments and what I was having the students do and how they are going to be scored. I also
learned how many different types of assessments and feedback there are to use. Some different
types of assessment that were used in my lessons were formative, summative and many
checklists. I learned how easy checklists are and how quick a one-on-one assessment takes with
each individual student when using a checklist. The feedback I used throughout my lessons were
written and verbal. Verbal feedback I learned works best with the classroom I am in because the
students are between the ages of five and six years old and written feedback is harder for them to
understand and remember compared to verbal feedback where I was able to sit with them and tell
them how they did and their different results. In the article Identifying predictors of students’
perception of and engagement with assessment feedback, it states “The concept that feedback
work has been proposed” (Ali, Ahmed & Rose, 2017). If I had to do anything differently during
lesson week, it would have been to be more open-minded when it came to my formative
assessments and how I gave feedback. I would have had the students do more hands-on
reviewing when it came to the formative assessment. I used checklists for each assessment, but I
wish I would have had the students do more hands-on learning and have more materials for them
After reviewing the student perception survey, my strengths were control, care and
challenge. In the classroom, I show control by having good classroom management. I use many
strategies that the classroom teacher uses and always reinforce when necessary. I show care by
asking the students how they feel, let them know that I am there for help and constantly ask if
they understand what they are doing on a certain assignment or activity. I challenge the students
by asking higher-order questions to have the students brainstorm and think outside of the
box. When it comes to weaknesses, they are captivate and confer. I was surprised when I saw
that captivate was one of my weaker areas. I feel that for the most part, the students are engaged
when I had activities for them. I can grow in these areas by having more interesting activities for
the students and more hands-on materials for them to use. The students learn the best when they
have hands-on activities and games to play while learning at the same time.
Work Cited
Ali, N., Ahmed, L., & Rose, S. (2018). Identifying predictors of students’ perception of and
engagement with assessment feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 239–
251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735609
Are You Tapping into Prior Knowledge Often Enough in Your Classroom? (n.d.). Retrieved
from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/prior-knowledge-tapping-into-often-classroom-
rebecca-alber