ASSIGNMENT#2

Submitted By: Irfan Mansoor Ahmed (10227)

Submitted To: Sir Syed Iftikhar Ali

Dated: November 4,2010

Q#1

Data Collection Methods

Data Collection is an important aspect of any type of research study. Inaccurate data
collection can impact the results of a study and ultimately lead to invalid results.

Data collection methods for impact evaluation vary along a continuum. At the one end
of this continuum are quantitative methods and at the other end of the continuum are
Qualitative methods for data collection.

Quantitative and Qualitative Data collection methods

The Quantitative data collection methods, rely on random sampling and structured
data collection instruments that fit diverse experiences into predetermined response
categories. They produce results that are easy to summarize, compare, and generalize.

Quantitative research is concerned with testing hypotheses derived from theory

and/or being able to estimate the size of a phenomenon of interest. Depending on
the research question, participants may be randomly assigned to different
treatments. If this is not feasible, the researcher may collect data on participant
and situational characteristics in order to statistically control for their influence on
the dependent, or outcome, variable. If the intent is to generalize from the research
participants to a larger population, the researcher will employ probability sampling
to select participants.

Typical quantitative data gathering strategies include:

• Experiments/clinical trials.
 • Observing and recording well-defined events (e.g., counting
the number of patients waiting in emergency at specified times
of the day).
• Obtaining relevant data from management information
systems.
• Administering surveys with closed-ended questions (e.g., face-
to face and telephone interviews, questionnaires etc).
(http://www.achrn.org/quantitative_methods.htm)

Interviews

In Quantitative research(survey research),interviews are more structured than in

Qualitative research.

In a structured interview,the researcher asks a standard set of questions and nothing

more.(Leedy and Ormrod, 2001)

Face -to -face interviews have a distinct advantage of enabling the researcher to
establish rapport with potential participants and therefore gain their cooperation.
These interviews yield highest response rates in survey research. They also allow the
researcher to clarify ambiguous answers and when appropriate, seek follow-up
information. Disadvantages include impractical when large samples are involved time
consuming and expensive.(Leedy and Ormrod, 2001)

Telephone interviews are less time consuming and less expensive and the researcher
has ready access to anyone on the planet who has a telephone. Disadvantages are that
the response rate is not as high as the face-to- face interview but considerably higher
than the mailed questionnaire. The sample may be biased to the extent that people
without phones are part of the population about whom the researcher wants to draw
inferences.

Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI): is a form of personal

interviewing, but instead of completing a questionnaire, the interviewer brings along a
laptop or hand-held computer to enter the information directly into the database. This
method saves time involved in processing the data, as well as saving the interviewer
from carrying around hundreds of questionnaires. However, this type of data
collection method can be expensive to set up and requires that interviewers have
computer and typing skills.
Questionnaires

Paper-pencil-questionnaires can be sent to a large number of people and saves the

researcher time and money. People are more truthful while responding to the
questionnaires regarding controversial issues in particular due to the fact that their
responses are anonymous. But they also have drawbacks. Majority of the people who
receive questionnaires don't return them and those who do might not be representative
of the originally selected sample.(Leedy and Ormrod, 2001)

Web based questionnaires : A new and inevitably growing methodology is the use
of Internet based research. This would mean receiving an e-mail on which you would
click on an address that would take you to a secure web-site to fill in a questionnaire.
This type of research is often quicker and less detailed. Some disadvantages of this
method include the exclusion of people who do not have a computer or are unable to
access a computer. Also the validity of such surveys are in question as people might
be in a hurry to complete it and so might not give accurate responses.
(http://www.statcan.ca/english/edu/power/ch2/methods/methods.htm)

Questionnaires often make use of Checklist and rating scales. These devices help
simplify and quantify people's behaviors and attitudes. A checklist is a list of
behaviors, characteristics, or other entities that the researcher is looking for. Either the
researcher or survey participant simply checks whether each item on the list is
observed, present or true or vice versa. A rating scale is more useful when a behavior
needs to be evaluated on a continuum. They are also known as Likert scales. (Leedy
and Ormrod, 2001)

Qualitative data collection methods play an important role in impact evaluation by

providing information useful to understand the processes behind observed results and
assess changes in people’s perceptions of their well-being. Furthermore qualitative
methods can beused to improve the quality of survey-based quantitative evaluations
by helping generate evaluation hypothesis; strengthening the design of survey
questionnaires and expanding or clarifying quantitative evaluation findings. These
methods are characterized by the following attributes:

• they tend to be open-ended and have less structured protocols

(i.e., researchers may change the data collection strategy by
adding, refining, or dropping techniques or informants)
• they rely more heavily on interactive interviews; respondents
may be interviewed several times to follow up on a particular
issue, clarify concepts or check the reliability of data
 • they use triangulation to increase the credibility of their
findings (i.e., researchers rely on multiple data collection
methods to check the authenticity of their results)
• generally their findings are not generalizable to any specific
population, rather each case study produces a single piece of
evidence that can be used to seek general patterns among
different studies of the same issue

Regardless of the kinds of data involved, data collection in a qualitative study takes a
great deal of time. The researcher needs to record any potentially useful data
thoroughly, accurately, and systematically, using field notes, sketches, audiotapes,
photographs and other suitable means. The data collection methods must observe the
ethical principles of research.

The qualitative methods most commonly used in evaluation can be classified in three
broad categories:

• in-depth interview
• observation methods
• document review

Different ways of collecting evaluation data are useful for different

purposes, and each has advantages and disadvantages. Various
factors will influence your choice of a data collection method: the
questions you want to investigate, resources available to you, your
timeline, and more.

Q#2

Primary & Secondary Data

PRIMARY data is data that you collect yourself using such methods as:
 • direct observation - lets you focus on details of importance to you; lets you
see a system in real rather than theoretical use (othen faults are unlikely or
trivial in theory but quite real and annoying in practice);
• surveys - written surveys let you collect considerable quantities of detailed
data. You have to either trust the honesty of the people surveyed or build in
self-verifying questions (e.g. questions 9 and 24 ask basically the same thing
but using different words - different answers may indicate the surveyed person
is being inconsistent, dishonest or inattentive).
• interviews - slow, expensive, and they take people away from their regular
jobs, but they allow in-depth questioning and follow-up questions. They also
show non-verbal communication such as face-pulling, fidgetting, shrugging,
hand gestures, sarcastic expressions that add further meaning to spoken words.
e.g. "I think it's a GREAT system" could mean vastly different things
depending on whether the person was sneering at the time! A problem with
interviews is that people might say what they think the interviewer wants to
hear; they might avoid being honestly critical in case their jobs or reputation
might suffer.
• logs (e.g. fault logs, error logs, complaint logs, transaction logs). Good,
empirical, objective data sources (usually, if they are used well). Can yield lots
of valuable data about system performance over time under different
conditions.

Primary data can be relied on because you know where it came from and what was
done to it. It's like cooking something yourself. You know what went into it.

SECONDARY data is collected from external sources such as:

• TV, radio, internet
• magazines, newspapers
• reviews
• research articles
• stories told by people you know

There's a lot more secondary data than primary data, and secondary data is a whole
lot cheaper and easier to acquire than primary data. The problem is that often the
reliability, accuracy and integrity of the data is uncertain. Who collected it? Can they
be trusted? Did they do any preprocessing of the data? Is it biased? How old is it?
Where was it collected? Can the data be verified, or does it have to be taken on faith?
Often secondary data has been pre-processed to give totals or averages and the
original details are lost so you can't verify it by replicating the methods used by the
original data collectors.

In short, primary data is expensive and difficult to acquire, but it's trustworthy.
Secondary data is cheap and easy to collect, but must be treated with caution.