Cyber Bullying Final Report
Cyber Bullying Final Report
of London
We thank Alessa Ferretti and Lalitha Chamakalayil for assistance, and the Anti-
Bullying Alliance for funding for this project.
2
Executive Summary
technology.
Method:
questions, with some qualitative sections, and took 20-25 minutes to complete.
Results
Incidence of cyberbullying:
6.6%, had experienced being cyberbullied more frequently, over the last
couple of months.
3
• Phone call, text messages and email were the most common forms of
cyberbullying both inside and outside of school, while chat room bullying was
• A significant interaction between age and gender was found in relation to the
effects of email bullying, and the use of instant messaging, which showed
this taking place), followed by phone calls (37%) and text messaging (29%).
The other methods were slightly less well known, in particular chat room
• Picture/video clip and Phone call were perceived to have more impact on the
• Website and Text message bullying were rated as being about equal in impact
to traditional bullying
• Chat room, Instant messaging and Email bullying bullying were believed to
• Most cyberbullying lasts only a week or so, but some lasts much longer,
• A substantial minority (around one-third) of victims have told nobody about it.
• Most pupils thought that banning mobile phones would result in pupils using
them secretly
• Most pupils thought that restricting private internet use in school could not
• The findings from this survey are in line with previously reported findings
from studies by the NCH, which found that between 20 and 25% of school
• Rates of text message and chatroom bullying were similar, although a greater
• These findings are all higher than reported rates of cyberbullying in studies by
Oliver and Candappa (2003) and Balding (2004), although both of these
• Future research should make use of the seven subtypes of cyberbullying, all of
which have been found to occur in school, even though sometimes to a limited
extent.
5
• A greater sample size would allow for a more thorough exploration, which
would include more year groups to compare across the entire age range and
and outside of school, and given the prevalence outside school, further
Introduction
carried out by a group or an individual repeatedly and over time against a victim who
can not easily defend him or herself (Whitney & Smith, 1993, Olweus, 1999).
Using these definitions for bullying, we can extend them to define cyberbullying.
a group or individual, using electronic forms of contact, repeatedly and over time
against a victim who can not easily defend him or herself. Cyberbullying is a form of
bullying which has in recent years become more apparent, as the use of electronic
devices such as computers and mobile phones by young people has increased.
Cyberbullying can take many forms, and for this study we subdivided the concept of
• Email bullying
• Chat-room bullying
These sub-categories were chosen because ‘cyberbullying’ is a very broad term, and
Cyberbullying is a fairly recent concept, and the research exploring it is still in its
initial phases. The relatively few studies that have been carried out are mostly
confined to examining just one aspect of cyberbullying (for example text messaging),
NCH (formerly known as the National Children’s Home) have produced two surveys
on cyberbullying. The first study, from 2002, focuses mainly on text message
bullying. NCH conducted a national survey and the main findings were that one
quarter of 11 to 19 year olds in the U.K. had been threatened or bullied via their
mobile phone or personal computer, and that 16% had received bullying or
threatening text messages. Of those who had reported being bullied by text messages,
29% had not told anyone that they had been bullied. There is an unspecified sample
NCH followed up this initial study with a more detailed survey, “Putting U in the
picture-Mobile phone bullying survey 2005”. This was a survey of 770 young people
aged 11-19, conducted in March/April 2005. It found that 20% of young people had
been bullied or threatened by some sort of digital bullying, and that 14% had been
email. Text message bullying was thus the most prevalent form of cyberbullying.
8
feeling threatened, and of these, 17% reported they felt that the image had been sent to
someone else. Also, 11% claimed to have sent a bullying or threatening message to
someone else. The other main findings were that 26% of those bullied said it was a
stranger bullying them, and 28% of those bullied told no one about the bullying.
Oliver and Candappa (2003) also had some data on cyberbullying in a study focused
on various bullying related issues. The report briefly mentions text message bullying
revealed they had received nasty text messages, and 2% of students from year 8
revealed that they had received nasty email messages. There was an unspecified time
frame for this study, and indeed for all those reviewed so far.
completed for the SHEU (Schools Health Education Unit) (Balding, 2004). A health
related questionnaire was completed by 40,439 young people between the ages of 10
and 15. The questionnaire focused on several aspects of young people’s lives,
you in the last month?” completed by students in year 6 (ages 10-11). Of these, only
1% of both boys and girls indicated they had been bullied through their mobile phone,
whereas 21% said they had been teased and 22% had been called nasty names.
A survey compiled by the NSPCC and ‘Sugar’ Magazine in 2005, conducted through
‘Sugar’ magazine, looked at cyberbullying in relation to girls. This report was based
on replies from 992 teenage girls across 11 regions in the U.K., and the average age of
9
respondents was 15. Text messaging was a frequent form of bullying, with 13% of
respondents saying they had sent nasty text messages and emails, and nearly half had
bear in mind that these results are not a representative sample of the population, as
only readers of ‘Sugar’ magazine who chose to respond to this survey replied, and so
University of Technology. The statistics given are that 13% of students have already
experienced cyberbullying by year 8, and that 25% of students knew somebody who
had experienced cyberbullying. This article also reports that more than half the
students asked thought that the phenomenon was on the rise. There is an unspecified
time frame or sample size for this study, and the method of collecting data is not
1,500 students from grades 4-8 (ages 9-13 years old). The main findings (cited from
www.mmu.k12.vt.us) were that 42% of children claimed to have been bullied whilst
online, that 35% had been threatened online, and that 21% had received threatening e-
mails or other messages. 53% of students surveyed admitted being mean or hurtful
online and 58% had said nothing to their parents if they had been threatened online.
It is worth mentioning here that there are no significant gender differences reported in
The fact that there is still little research on cyberbullying and electronic forms of
bullying was confirmed when searching for journals using Internet sites such as Psych
Info, and getting no matches. The key words “cyberbullying”, “text message
bullying”, “sms bullying”, “cellular phone bullying”, “chat room bullying”, “internet
bullying”, “instant messaging bullying” and “electronic bullying” found very few
relevant results when searching through journal websites such as Psych Info.
When searching the term “cyberbullying” or “text message bullying” etc on the
internet (e.g. Google), several help and information websites appear indicating that
Several of these websites offer advice on how to deal with this form of bullying (tell a
teacher etc), and a main theme that appears is that cyberbullying is a form of bullying
which follows the victim home, and where the bully can remain unidentifiable and
Report.
One aim of this study was to have a more general understanding of cyberbullying and
its prevalence in the age group 11-16 years. Cyberbullying is a fairly new concept,
and research into cyberbullying is still in its initial phases; this study aimed to
and email bullying are the aspects that have been mainly looked into by previous
11
research, and this study aimed to include aspects such as chat room bullying, and
bullying by phone calls, which fall into the category of cyberbullying. Another aim
was to look at whether there were any gender or age differences, or any significant
differences, or gender and age interactions, had been reported in previous research
into cyberbullying, and it is not clear if these were looked for or not. We also aimed
Methodology
bullying, bullying through instant messaging, bullying through websites) and included
some other general questions. The questionnaire also had some qualitative items,
where participants could comment on a certain question, and give a more detailed
answer. The questionnaire itself took 20-25 minutes to complete. The time-frame for
this study was given as the ‘past couple of months’, so responses only reflect incidents
in that term, between Easter and giving the questionnaires in late June or early July. A
To obtain participants, a list of mixed gender high schools in various London LEA’s
was made, and schools were called and told about the study and asked whether they
would like to participate. Several schools were called until enough participants were
recruited for the study. In total 20 schools agreed to participate, and each school
questionnaires were then mailed out to each of the 20 schools, and the schools were
asked to distribute 1 questionnaire to a boy and a girl from each year. The schools
were asked to pick their participants randomly. The questionnaires were mailed out in
late June, when most schools had year 11’s on study leave, due to the GCSE
The questionnaires were mailed with a cover letter attached to each questionnaire, and
questionnaires with specific instructions (including what to tell the participants, and to
seal the envelope with the completed questionnaires in front of the participants to
the schools to send back the completed questionnaires without having to pay postal
charges, was enclosed. Participating schools were given contact numbers to contact
the research assistants in case of any problems/concerns, and if any concerns were
aired then the schools could ask a researcher to go to the school and administer the
further help.
13
Procedure
The pupils were handed the questionnaire, and the supervisor read out instructions.
The questionnaire included a page explaining cyberbullying, and some of the aims of
the study. Pupils were told that participation in the study was optional, and that if
they did not want to complete the questionnaire they did not have to. They were also
given an information sheet (at the back of the questionnaire), for them to take home,
that provided contact numbers and websites if they needed advice or help. Pupils
were also told that their questionnaires would be anonymous and that the school
Out of the 20 schools that agreed to participate, 14 schools sent back completed
questionnaires. Some schools did not manage to send back a complete set of 8
Participants
Gender
Total
Boy Girl
Younger 19 24 43
Age
Older 24 25 49
Total 43 49 92
14
Results
We first compared rates of being bullied overall (in any way), and being cyberbullied.
Table 2 gives the responses to the first two questions of the survey, which assessed
how many students had been bullied or cyberbullied at school in the past couple of
Table 2. Numbers (and percentages) of students that had been either bullied (total N =
92) or cyberbullied (total N = 90) in school, in the last 2 months.
Being bullied was not infrequent in this sample, with 46% reporting it at least once
over the last two months, and 14% at least two or three times a month or more often.
These figures were lower when examining the prevalence of cyberbullying. 22% of
students had been cyberbullied on at least one occasion, while 6.6% had suffered
repeated victimisation. Although the figures for being cyberbullied are less than half
of the overall figures for being bullied in any way, it shows that cyberbullying is
present, and is already being used intensively in the victimization of some students.
15
subtype of cyberbullying, inside and outside of school. It also reports the number of
students who are aware of each form of cyberbullying taking place. The final column
presents an impact factor, through which we are able to gauge the effect that this kind
of bullying has on its victim, compared to more ‘traditional’ methods. The impact
factor has been calculated by assigning values to the severity respondents believed
each form of cyberbullying has on the victim compared to traditional bullying (less
harmful = -1; the same = 0; more harmful = +1). Thus a more positive score means
that the impact of this form of cyberbullying is seen as high, a negative score as low.
The first two data columns of Table 3 show that phone call, text message and email
bullying are the most common forms of cyberbullying, both inside and outside of
school. Picture/video clip, instant messaging and website bullying were reported to a
lesser degree; and with chat room bullying, only one pupil reported suffering this at
school. Within school, almost 15% of pupils had been bullied through text messages
and phone calls at least once, while 3% were victimized in these ways or by email
bullying more than once or twice. All three of these more common forms of
cyberbullying have higher prevalence rates outside of the school. One quarter of the
sample (23 participants) had been victimized by phone calls outside of school at least
once, and 10 on a more regular basis. Although chat room bullying was the least
likely method to occur in school, its use outside of school was equal to several other
cyberbullying subtypes.
16
Table 3. Numbers (and percentages) for questions regarding the seven subtypes of
cyberbullying. Any = once or twice; Repeat = more than once or twice.
How often How often How often How often Number of Impact
have you have you have you have you pupils aware factor
been been bullied bullied of this type (see
bullied in bullied others in others of text).
school? outside school? outside cyberbullying
school? school? taking place.
(Any (Any (Any (Any
victims, victims, offenders, offenders,
Repeat Repeat Repeat Repeat
Victims) Victims) Offenders) Offenders)
Phone Call 13 23 3 7 34 15
Bullying (14.3%) (25.0%) (3.3%) (7.6%) (37.0%)
3 10 1 1
(3.3%) (10.9%) (1.1%) (1.1%)
Text message 13 16 2 3 27 -3
bullying (14.3%) (17.6%) (2.3%) (3.4%) (29.3%)
3 3 0 1
(3.3%) (3.3%) (1.1%)
Email 5 10 2 3 22 -16
Bullying (5.5%) (10.9%) (2.2%) (3.3%) (24.4%)
3 4 2 1
(3.3%) (4.4%) (2.2%) (1.1%)
Picture/Video 6 6 2 3 42 27
Clip phone (6.5%) (6.5%) (2.2%) (3.3%) (45.7%)
bullying
0 0 0 0
Instant 5 5 3 4 23 -18
Messaging (5.5%) (5.5%) (3.3%) (4.4%) (25.3%)
Bullying
1 3 0 1
(1.1%) (3.3%) (1.1%)
Website 5 5 2 2 17 1
Bullying (5.5%) (5.5%) (2.2%) (2.2%) (19.1%)
0 1 0 0
(1.1%)
Chat room 1 5 0 2 11 -23
bullying (1.1%) (5.5%) (2.2%) (12.1%)
0 0 0 0
17
The next two columns of Table 3 show the findings for pupils who admitted to
bullying others by cyberbullying. Phone calls are again the most common method,
followed closely by all the other forms, which show little difference in terms of how
often they are used to bully. Again, these forms of cyberbullying are more commonly
used outside of school, especially chat room bullying which no one reported using to
The fifth data column of Table 3 presents results for awareness. When asked which
forms of cyberbullying they were aware of taking place (in school or among their
friends), most students (46%) knew of bullying via pictures or video clips on mobile
phones, while slightly fewer (37%) knew of phone call bullying. These figures were
less for the other subtypes, ranging from 29% for text message bullying to 19% for
website bullying; the least known method of cyberbullying was via chat rooms, with
The final data column of Table 3 provides an impact factor for each form of
cyberbullying. This provides an insight into the effect that each form of cyberbullying
is perceived generally to have upon its victim. Picture/video clip bullying has the
highest impact factor (27) indicating that a large number of pupils believe the effect
this has on its victim is worse than that from usual forms of bullying. Phone call
bullying also scores highly on this scale. Text message and website bullying have
relatively neutral scores, respondents feeling that the effect they have is similar to that
of traditional bullying. Bullying by email, chat rooms and instant messaging all have
18
negative impact factors: students perceive these forms of bullying as less effective, or
Qualitative Analysis
A later section of the questionnaire asked participants to describe any other forms of
cyberbullying that had not been covered so far. 15 participants (17%) gave additional
methods of cyberbullying, of which the most commonly stated form was “Happy
slap” (although ‘happy slap’ is a form of bullying which involves picture/video clips
on a mobile phone and so could come under that category already in the
nasty messages are left on the mobile answer phone service), bullying via “free SMS
websites” (websites where free SMS text messages can be sent), “prank calls”
(bullying via phone calls, where a ‘joke’ is played on the person who is called) and
“bluetooth bullying” (bluetooth is a way to send messages and files via mobile
ANOVAS were performed. The analyses use the scores collected from questions
which asked students to state how often they had been bullied in each way. Scores
were ranked from 0 to 4, 0 meaning the child had not been bullied at all, through to 4
where the child had been bullied several times a week. The key findings that were
statistically significant are presented below in Table 4. The results did not reveal any
significant effects concerning age, however five questions showed gender differences.
The significance level and mean scores for each group are presented.
19
Age/Gender
Questions Age Gender
Interaction
F = 4.87, p = 0.030
Have you been bullied in school? NS NS
(Girls = 1.04, Boys = 0.51)
Have you been cyberbullied in F = 4.53, p = 0.036
NS NS
school? (Girls = 0.54, Boys = 0.17)
How often have you been bullied via F = 5.68, p = 0.019
NS NS
phone calls in school? (Girls = 0.40, Boys = 0.05)
How often have you been bullied via F = 11.55, p = 0.01
NS NS
phone calls outside of school? (Girls = 0.88, Boys = 0.12)
How often have you been bullied via F = 6.13, p = 0.015 NS
NS
text messages outside of school? (Girls = 0.35, Boys = 0.07)
Girls were more likely to be both bullied and cyberbullied in school than boys.
Gender differences were separately statistically significant for phone call bullying,
both inside and outside of school; and for text message bullying outside of school. In
Figure 1 illustrates this gender difference by comparing the mean scores for each type
of cyberbullying across gender. It provides visual confirmation that girls were more
involved in most forms of being cyberbullied than boys. Girls score higher, not just on
overall cyberbullying, but in many of its subcategories, including phone call, text
message and email bullying. No boys reported being bullied in chat rooms or by
instant messaging. The only subcategories in which boys score higher (but not
statistically significantly) than girls are picture/video clip and website bullying.
Among boys, text messaging is the most common form of cyberbullying, while for
girls, bullying by phone appears to be the most frequently used method. Therefore
both genders show varying degrees of involvement in cyberbullying, and some of the
Cyber bullying at
0.60 school
Tex t bullying in
school
P icture bully ing in
school
0.50
P hone call bullying
in school
E mail bullying in
school
0.40 Chatroom bully ing
in school
Instant Mess aging
bullying in s chool
Me an
Website bullying in
0.30 school
0.20
0.10
0.00
boy girl
g e nd e r
After assessing any age or gender effects, further analysis was conducted to explore
for any interactions between these variables. Two questions showed significant
results, and are presented in Table 5, along with the mean scores for each group of
participants. The first of these concerned the question ‘Do you think the effects of
email bullying are better or worse than that of traditional bullying?’. It appears that
young boys believe the effects of email bullying to be worse than girls of the same
The second finding was that older boys are more likely to bully others by instant
messaging than younger boys. As before, girls responses to the question remained
fairly consistent across age groups. Younger boys were the least likely to bully others
by instant messaging.
Three questions asked about who had done any cyberbullying – which class they were
from, whether boys or girls, and how many students were involved. These were asked
for each of the seven types of cyberbullying, but were of course only answered by the
relatively small numbers of pupils who had experienced each type. The data in Tables
Table 6 indicates that most of the cyberbullying is done by students in the same class,
or (most often) in a different class but the same year group. It was never reported by
students from a lower grade. A number of those cyberbullying were not in the school
(the questions did not discriminate bullying inside or outside school); and sometimes
the identity of cyberbullies was not known – especially for phone call bullying.
22
Table 6: In which class(es) is the student or students who bully you by [type of
bullying]? Numbers of pupils responding in each category.
Table 7 indicates that both boys and girls are reported as doing the cyberbullying –
Table 7: Have you been bullied by [type of bullying] by boys or girls? Numbers of
pupils responding in each category.
Table 8 indicates that the cyberbullying is generally done by one student, or a small
Table 8: By how many students have you usually been bullied by [type of bullying]?
Numbers of pupils responding in each category.
Two questions asked about how long any cyberbullying had lasted; and whether they
had told anyone about it (and who they had told). These were asked for each of the
seven types of cyberbullying, but were of course only answered by the relatively
small numbers of pupils who had experienced each type. The data in Tables 9 and 10
Table 9: How long has the bullying by [type of bullying] lasted? Numbers of pupils
responding in each category.
Table 9 indicates that predominantly the cyberbullying had just lasted one or two
weeks. However for a few students it had lasted longer, and especially for phone call
Table 10 indicates that parents, and friends, are told about cyberbullying much more
often than teachers or other adults in school (of course, some of this cyberbullying is
Table 10: Have you told anyone (that you have been bullied by [type of bullying])?
Numbers of pupils responding in each category.
Would banning mobile phones or private internet use in school, help to avoid
cyberbullying?
This question was asked (in the appropriate form, see Appendix A) for each of the
seven types of cyberbullying, but was of course only answered by the relatively small
numbers of pupils who had experienced each type. All students could respond to this
question (not just victims), so the data in Table 11 are therefore shown in percentages.
25
Table 11: Do you think that banning mobile phones/ private internet use in school
would help to avoid bullying through [type of bullying]? Percentages of pupils
responding in each category.
No, students 29 44 14 39 9 10 8
will use the
internet whilst
the teacher is
not looking
No, they will 43 22 46 24 51 49 46
just use the
internet after
school
No, both of 15 14 18 15 20 18 23
above
Table 11 shows that only a minority of pupils think that banning mobile phones or
private internet use in school would prevent the bullying. Over half think that even if
mobile phones were banned, they could still be used secretly to send nasty text
messages or video clips. So far as internet based bullying is concerned (email, instant
messaging, website, chatroom) over half believe it will just happen after school.
Discussion
A sizeable proportion of the students, 46%, reported that they had been bullied in
some way at least once over the past two months and of these, 14% suffered from
bullying on a more regular basis. These figures are comparable to previous general
survey figures on large populations (e.g. Whitney & Smith, 1993). Rates of
cyberbullying were, not surprisingly, less: 22% had been cyberbullied at least once or
26
twice, and 6.6% were subjected to repeated attacks of cyberbullying; for 5 students
this victimisation took place at least once a week or more often. Although
experienced; 14% suffered from this at school at least once, and 3% frequently; but
this rose to 25% outside school, at least once, and 11% frequently. Text messages
were next most frequent, followed by email bullying, both more frequent outside of
school. The other forms of cyberbullying showed lower rates of occurrence both
inside and outside of school, although chat room bullying was infrequent, and neither
it nor picture/video clip bullying had been experienced repeatedly in this sample. In
relation to admitting to bullying others, phone call bullying was again the most
frequent, with 3% using it inside school, and 8% outside school. The least used
method of bullying was again through chat rooms, and only outside school.
experience. The form of cyberbullying most well known to students was through
picture or video clips, with 46% aware of this taking place. This was followed by
phone call and text message bullying, which 37% and 29% of students had heard of
respectively. Chat room bullying was the least recognised form of cyberbullying, with
Phone call and text message bullying were the most used forms of victimisation
according to the respondents, yet the method of cyberbullying most students knew of
was via picture or video clips. A possible explanation for this is the heightened media
coverage concerning bullying through video clips or pictures on mobile phones, more
additional method of cyberbullying, yet very few students reported bullying others or
being bullied via this medium. It may be that the related media coverage has
heightened awareness of video clip bullying, which is why students are more
conscious of this form of cyberbullying than others, which, although more prevalent,
The impact factor in Table 3 gives an indication as to how serious students perceive
the effects of cyberbullying to be, compared to traditional forms. The responses show
a variety of opinion regarding each of the seven subtypes. Picture/video clip and
Phone call bullying scored highly on the impact factor, with the majority of
individual. Website and Text messaging and scored fairly neutral values, indicating
that respondents felt the effect these forms have is similar to that of usual forms of
bullying. At the opposite end of the scale, Chat room bullying, Instant messaging and
email bullying all scored negative values; respondents felt these methods of
The reason for this discrimination is unclear given the current data. Online
applications can give the child the opportunity to block offensive messages, which
may explain why bullying through chat room, instant messaging or email was
perceived to be less damaging. Phone calls on the other hand, allow the bully to accost
the victim outside of school hours, which may indicate why it is considered more
harmful than traditional bullying, which is mostly centred around physical contact.
The limited amount of data prevents a more thorough examination of this issue, but
future research should aim to investigate why students perceive some forms of
cyberbullying to be more hurtful to the victim than others, and how this compares to
Gender differences
Comparing the pupil’s responses between genders revealed some interesting findings.
Girls were significantly more likely to be both bullied and cyberbullied at school than
boys. Furthermore, girls were more exposed to bullying by text messages and phone
calls, the two methods of cyberbullying found to be the most prevalent among
schoolchildren. Traditionally, girls show similar or lower rates of being bullied than
boys (e.g. Whitney & Smith, 1993). Previous research into cyberbullying has found
purely be attributable to the sample used. However, as Figure 1 shows, we found girls
reporting greater victimisation through all cyberbullying methods with the exception
of website and picture/video clip bullying. This gender difference is also borne out by
the data in Table 7, where more girls are thought to be involved in doing the
discrepancy, to discover if these results are attributable purely to the sample, or are a
Age differences
differences were found between the 11-13 and 14-16 age groups. In general there is
usually some decline in self-reports of being bullied, with age (Smith, Madsen &
Moody, 1998). That there is no decline here may reflect increasing ownership and
use of mobile phones and email with the older age group. As Table 6 shows, most
cyberbullying is within the year group, by pupils of about the same age. Studying a
wider age range of pupils would be desirable for looking in more detail at age trends
Examining for any interactions between age and gender, two significant results were
found. Younger boys perceived the effects of email bullying to be more severe than
older boys, or than girls in either age group. Also, older boys were significantly more
likely to bully others through instant messaging than younger boys, while among
girls, there is again little fluctuation. This indicates that boys from different age
commonly encounters problems concerning boys of different age groups, and this
study is no exception. However, the fact that only two questions showed this
discrepancy means the findings are not consistent throughout the whole study, and
only gives an indication of a more generalised interaction between gender and age
groups, which future research may be able to substantiate with a larger sample.
30
Tables 8, 9 and 10 show that most reported cyberbullying comes from one, or 2-3,
other students, and much of it lasts one or two weeks. Our data does not allow us to
say how or why the cyberbullying stopped, but while much is short-term, some can
last a lot longer – especially, it seems, phone call bullying, where one-third of victims
said it had lasted about a year or even longer. Many victims had not told anyone
cyberbullying. These figures are however similar to general survey figures for
This was viewed positively by only about one-fifth of pupils (Table 11). It seemed to
be generally felt that pupils who wanted to cyberbully would continue to use mobile
phones secretly, for text messaging and picture/video clips, even if not for actually
calling (which might be a bit more obvious). Regarding internet use, the scepticism
was more that it would be used outside school, so these figures are not in themselves
school, and also included more sub-categories of cyberbullying than most previous
studies. Table 12 shows the comparisons that are possible between the incidence rates
found in the current study, and the NCH studies from 2002 and 2005.
31
Table 12. Comparisons of rates of being cyberbullied, between the current study and
Experienced
22.2 % NA 25% 20%
cyberbullying
Bullied by
14.3 % 17.6 % 16% 14%
text
Bullied via
1.1 % 5.5 % NA 5%
chatrooms
Bullied via
5.5 % 10.9 % NA 4%
email
In the current study, the difference between bullying inside of school and outside of
school is distinguished (this is not the case in the NCH studies). Cyberbullying was
communications devices outside of school than inside. The results between the
studies are similar (more so with the inside school results for email bullying, and the
outside of school results for chat room bullying). The similarities between these
figures, and the relatively large percentages, support each other and add weight to the
The figures for text message bullying however are higher than the results published in
Oliver and Candappa’s (2003) report, where 4% of year 8’s had received nasty text
messages, and 2% nasty email messages; and from the SHEU report (Balding, 2004),
where 1% of year 6’s were reported to have received nasty text messages. In the case
of the SHEU report, the low figure may possibly be due to the younger age of their
respondents.
32
Regarding telling anyone about cyberbullying, the previous NCH surveys found rates
of not telling of 29% and 28% respectively. Our figures are higher than this; though
given the relatively small number of victims (only 20 overall in the sample), this
There were some problems encountered in the data collection process. One was the
administering of the questionnaires, which were sent out by post, with instructions.
questionnaire. The teachers were instructed to select one boy and one girl from each
year, and to pick a random sample. There is a possibility that the teachers may not
have followed these instructions precisely, and instead chosen a selective sample.
Some students may have volunteered rather than be chosen to represent a class
The length of the questionnaire could also be considered an issue. The questionnaire
had 88 multiple-choice questions, plus several qualitative items and was estimated to
take 20 to 25 minutes to complete. There is a possibility that the attention span of the
questionnaires were completed satisfactorily. Due to the fact that there is little
The questionnaire was distributed at a time when almost all schools had their year 11
(ages 15-16) students away on study leave for their G.C.S.E examinations. Therefore
the questionnaire did not represent as wide a range of ages as it could have, if it were
Finally, not all schools approached, returned questionnaires (even though they had
previously agreed to participate). The sample size of n=92 is not large. However the
sample does come from 14 schools, so results are more representative than if just one
classes or year groups participating. A greater sample size would allow for a
• Do the survey at a time of year when all year groups are at school (when no
year groups are away for study leave etc); including more year groups to
compare across the entire age range would allow a more profound examination
teachers.
34
• The length of the questionnaire could be reduced. Future studies could look at
• Measure the effects of cyberbullying over different time periods, for example
Conclusion
prevalent, as the use of technology increases by young people. Previous studies have
occurring inside and outside of school, and also included more sub-categories of
cyberbullying than most previous studies. It found that cyberbullying was reported
more outside of school than inside, and that ‘Phone Call Bullying’, ‘Text Message
The findings from this study correlated with previous findings, from the NCH studies
(2002, 2005), and also looked into several types of bullying (such as instant
messaging, and website bullying) which had previously not examined. This study
also found a significant difference by gender, for certain questions, and that girls are
age groups were found. Most cyberbullying was done by one or a few students,
usually from the same year group. It often just lasted a week or so, but sometimes
much longer. A substantial minority of victims had told nobody about it.
not looked at before. Suggestions for further research are made, and for a better
The nature and increasing extent of cyberbullying obviously raise issues about how to
deal with it, and whether existing anti-bullying strategies are effective in this context.
A thorough examination of this is outside the scope of this Report, but Appendix B
does list some current websites with information and advice on this topic.
36
References
results for 40,430 young people between the ages of 10 and 15. Schools Health
www.nch.org.uk
www.nspcc.org.uk
Children and Young People. Department for Education and Skills, Nottingham.
Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In Smith, P.K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D.,
Smith, P.K., Madsen, K. & Moody, J. (1999). What causes the age decline in reports
Smith, P.K., & Sharp, S., editors (1994). School bullying: Insights and Perspectives.
London: Routledge.
Whitney, I., & Smith, P.K., (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19135
http://www.mmu.k12.vt.us/informati on/archive/ISafe/isafe.html
38
Cyberbullying
We are interested in how children and adolescents get on with each other in and out of
school.
You do not have to answer this questionnaire, but we would be grateful if you did.
Anything that you write will be treated as most confidential. You do not have to put
your names on the questionnaire.
Your teachers, the head teacher and your classmates will not be shown your answers.
No one in the school will know what you write, so please answer truthfully.
Please only turn over each page when you are told to do so.
39
School: _____________________________________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________________________
Class/Year: ___________________________________________________________
Black Caribbean
Black African
Black other
Indian
Pakistani
Bangladeshi
Chinese
Mixed Race
Other
_________________________________
boy
40
Most of the questions are about your life in and out of school in the past 2 or 3 months,
that is, the period from Easter until now. So when you answer, you should think of how it
has been during the past couple of months and not only how it is just now.
Before we start with questions about bullying, we will first define or explain the word
bullying. We say a student is being bullied when another student, or several other students
say mean and hurtful things or make fun of him or her and call him or her mean and
hurtful names
completely ignore or exclude him or her from their group of friends or leave him or her
out of things on purpose
hit, kick, push, shove around, or lock him or her inside a room
tell lies or spread false rumours about him or her or send mean notes and try to make
other students dislike him or her
and other hurtful things like that.
When we talk about bullying, these things happen repeatedly, and it is difficult for the student
being bullied to defend himself or herself. We also call it bullying, when a student is teased
repeatedly in a mean and hurtful way.
But we don’t call it bullying when the teasing is done in a friendly and playful way. Also, it is
not bullying when two students of about equal strength or power argue or fight.
1. First of all,
have you been bullied at I haven’t been bullied at school in the past couple of
school in the past couple of months
months (any kind of bullying,
It has only happened once or twice
including cyber-bullying)?
2 or 3 times a month
2 or 3 times a month
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
42
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
No
8. Do you think text message
bullying compared to has less of an effect on the victim
“normal, traditional,
has the same effect on the victim
conventional” bullying…
has more of an effect on the victim
don’t know
Reasons:___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________
43
In my class
In a higher grade
In a lower grade
In different grades
Not in my school
Mainly by 1 girl
By several girls
By several boys
Mainly by 1 student
Your parents/guardians
Your friends
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
45
Other:__________________________________________
_________
Content: (Describe):
________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
___________________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:________________________________________
No
21. Do you think picture or video-
clip bullying compared to has less of an effect on the victim
“normal, traditional,
has the same effect on the victim
conventional” bullying…
has more of an effect on the victim
don’t know
Reasons:___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________
46
In a higher grade
In a lower grade
In different grades
Not in my school
Mainly by 1 girl
By several girls
By several boys
Your parents/guardians
Your friends
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
48
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
No
33. Do you think bullying through
phone calls, compared to has less of an effect on the victim
“normal, traditional,
has the same effect on the victim
conventional” bullying…
has more of an effect on the victim
don’t know
Reasons:___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________
49
In my class
In a higher grade
In a lower grade
In different grades
Not in my school
Mainly by 1 girl
By several girls
By several boys
Mainly by 1 student
Your parents/guardians
Your friends
Email bullying
(receiving abusive emails to your email account)
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
51
Other:______________________________________________
________
Other:______________________________________________
________
don’t know
Reasons:_______________________________________________
______________________________________________________
_______________
In a higher grade
In a lower grade
In different grades
Not in my school
Mainly by 1 girl
By several girls
By several boys
Mainly by 1 student
Your parents/guardians
Your friends
Chat-room bullying
(being bullied in chat room through abusive messages)
52. How often have you been
bullied in chat-rooms in I do not use chat rooms
the past couple of months
I haven’t been bullied in chat-rooms in the past couple of
in school?
months in school
2 or 3 times a month
Other:____________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:____________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:____________________________________________
54
2 or 3 times a month
Other:____________________________________________
__________
56. Have you heard of
bullying taking place in Yes:
chat-rooms in your school __________________________________________________
or circle of friends in the __________________________________________________
past couple of months? _________________________________________
No
57. Do you think bullying in
chat-rooms compared to has less of an effect on the victim
“normal, traditional,
has the same effect on the victim
conventional” bullying…
has more of an effect on the victim
don’t know
Reasons:______________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
___________________________
In my class
In a higher grade
In a lower grade
In different grades
Not in my school
Mainly by 1 girl
By several girls
By several boys
Mainly by 1 student
Your parents/guardians
Your friends
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
No
69. Do you think bullying through
instant messaging compared has less of an effect on the victim
to “normal, traditional,
has the same effect on the victim
conventional” bullying…
has more of an effect on the victim
don’t know
Reasons:___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________
In my class
In a higher grade
In a lower grade
In different grades
Not in my school
Mainly by 1 girl
By several girls
By several boys
Mainly by 1 student
Your parents/guardians
Your friends
No, they will just use the instant messaging after school
Website bullying (for example setting up a negative website about someone, revealing personal details etc)
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
_______________________________________________
60
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
2 or 3 times a month
Other:__________________________________________
__________
No
81. Do you think bullying through
websites compared to has less of an effect on the victim
“normal, traditional,
has the same effect on the victim
conventional” bullying…
has more of an effect on the victim
don’t know
Reasons:________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_____________________________
In my class
In a higher grade
In a lower grade
In different grades
Not in my school
61
Mainly by 1 girl
By several girls
By several boys
Mainly by 1 student
Your parents/guardians
Your friends
If you have been cyber-bullied in any way (texts, pictures/photos or video-clips, email, website,
chat-rooms, or other), what sorts of comments/remarks (for example about your looks, race)
were made? What has been done to you?
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
____________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________
You have now completed the questionnaire. All the sections that you have filled
in are confidential so please do not discuss the answers you have written with
your friends or anyone else.
There is a sheet of paper attached to the back of this questionnaire, please keep it
and read it in your own time.
If you have a problem with bullying or anything else mentioned in the questionnaire
that you have just completed then you can talk to your teacher or Head Teacher who
will be able to help.
If you do not feel comfortable talking to someone in school you could talk to your
parents, and they can come with you to talk to a teacher about the problem.
You can also ring Childline, the number is 0800 1111. The call is free so you can ring
from a phone box, or if you ring from home and don’t feel comfortable telling your
family then the call will not show up on the telephone bill.
If you have access to the Internet you could look at a website such as
www.bbc.co.uk/education/bully, www.childline.org.uk or www.kidscape.org.uk for
advice and information.
It is important to remember that bullying happens to lots of people, and you are not
the only one that this happens to. There are people in your school and in
organisations like Childline who can listen to you and help you.
65
WEBSITES
Websites change rapidly and are proliferating as regards cyberbullying. The list
below may be helpful but a Google search is also likely to reveal new sites.
www.thinkuknow.co.uk for information about staying safe on the Internet, links to the
NSPCC/Childline/childnet/NCH websites and games to download and play.
www.chatdanger.com gives advice for young people and parents on using Internet
Chat rooms safely.
www.kidsmart.org.uk offers an Internet safety guide for young people
66
www.bullying.co.uk provides information and advice for parents and children about
bullying generally, suggests strategies for dealing with it and provides an e-mail
enquiry service.
No place to hide
‘You can’t run or hide from cyber-bullying’. A main theme occurring in much of the
literature, especially on the advice websites, is that Cyber-bullying and Text message
bullying are not like the traditional form of bullying, where once the victim gets home
they are away from the bully until the next day. Cyber-bullying is a form of bullying
that the victim cannot escape as they are constantly being sent messages to their
mobile etc, and so therefore they cannot escape the bully and bullying.
Different effects?
‘Cyber-bullying worse than Traditional bullying?’
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/14150257?source=Evening%20Standard
This article and others suggest that the psychological harm caused by cyber bullying
may be more harmful than the generally physical nature of traditional forms of
bullying. Self-harming by the victim has been reported due to text message and
cyber-bullying, and in the worst cases reports of suicides.
Breadth of audience
Cyber-bullying can reach particularly large audiences in a peer group compared with
the normally small groups that traditional bullying reaches. For example when nasty
comments are posted on the web, the audience that may see these comments is
potentially large.
For parents:
Be aware of uses of the Internet, mobile phones and the possibility of cyber-bullying
and text message bullying. Encourage their children to talk to them if anything is
happening, and if so to take appropriate measures (contact the school, or mobile
network, ISP etc).
67
[The Australian Government has a useful ‘Parent’s Guide to Internet Safety’, see
www.netalert.net.au]
For schools:
Amend existing bullying policies to include text message and cyber-bullying, and
ensure these forms of bullying are addressed in anti-bullying materials and
interventions.
[The Australian Government has a useful booklet and CD ‘CyberQuoll Internet
Safety Education for Primary school Students’, see www.netalert.net.au]
E-mail (kidscape.org)
• If you receive a nasty or abusive email (known as being flamed) don’t reply.
If it’s from someone you think you know, like someone at school, they’ll want
some kind of reaction. Don’t give them the satisfaction of replying and they’ll
probably stop.
• If they don’t stop you need to find out where the email is coming from. Using
an email client like Outlook or Outlook Express, clicking the right mouse
button over an email will reveal lots of details about where and who the email
came from. You can then get your parents to contact the school or the service
68
provider of the sender of the email. The service provider can be contacted by
writing abuse@ whatever the ISP host is, i.e. [email protected].
• The email can also come from people you don’t know. Under no
circumstances should you reply to these types of email, even if they have a
Click here and stop receiving this email link – this will just confirm your email
address as a real one.
• You can delete the emails but if the situation becomes serious print them off
so that if you need to take action you have evidence.
Web (www.kidscape.org)
• If the cyberbullying is on a school or community website, do as you would do
if the bullying was face to face – tell someone like your parents or teachers.
• If it’s on a site that you don’t know about, you will have to do a bit of research
to find out who hosts the website. There is a good article on Bullying Online
(see website details below) about general online safety, with a section on how
to get more details on possible owners of the website.
by text, voice or email to a number which the school can publicise. The message
would be automatically forwarded to an appropriate person in the school via a secure
link. It is being piloted in a school in Leicester in Anti-Bullying Week.
Childnet International
Childnet International’s mission is to work in partnership with others around the
world to help make the Internet a great and safe place for children. Mary-Louise
Morris from Childnet International spoke about what they call cyberbullying at the
Kidscape conference earlier in November. She referred to a research paper by
Professor Sonia Livingstone from LSE called UK Children Go Online (partly
sponsored by NCH) which looked at how children use technology www.children-go-
HT
online.net . According to this research, 33% of children say they have received nasty
TH
which describes how the effects of text bullying can be even more hurtful than other
bullying because it seems more intimate, there’s no escape and hurtful material can be
disseminated so widely so quickly. From the point of view of the child who is
bullying, cyber bullying offers anonymity which leads to disinhibition (more likely to
say something you would not say face to face). Childnet International’s Kidsmart
Project have produced a leaflet for children about Internet Safety which includes
reference to phone/text bullying. On their website you can also download a report
from a conference in Tokyo about children and technology which includes a paper
from John Carr, Associate Director for Children and Technology at NCH
NCH
NCH have a project/campaign called ITOK on their website which provides advice to
children and young people about mobile phone bullying.
This campaign works with schools to collect old mobile phones and redeem them for
cash donations to the school and prizes for the children. As part of this they send out
up to 200,000 action packs to students and would like to work with ABA to use these
packs to promote an anti-bullying initiative focusing on text messaging.
Vidicom
A UK company that specialises in the development and support of various SMS (text
messaging) platforms and wishes to help in the campaigning against bullying. They
have developed a service where people who are in distress for various reasons can
send a text message and receive a reply rather than having to talk to someone on the
phone. It is not clear who or where the reply would come from.
Magility
Although the perception is that nothing can be done apart from changing one's
number or getting the Network operators involved, Magility has devised blocking
software downloadable directly onto victims' phones that gives them (the victims)
control over content entering their phones.