Space Frame Report
Space Frame Report
0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 OBJECTIVE
To varift member forces obtain from experiment with tension coefficient
method
B(xB,yB)
TAB Ө
A(xA,yA
Assume the force in the member is TAB (+ve tension) and length LAB
= tAB (xB-xA)
= tAB(yB – yA)
Using statics, write the equation for each joint using the coordinate value and
solve for t. Convert it into force using:
6.0 PROCEDURE
Part 1:
w
S3
c
Part 2:
The graph of force against load for the theoretical and experimental results was plotted.
7.0 CALCULATION
i. Experimental Calculation
For a = 500
S = loaded – unloaded
S1 = 4.3 – 0.7
= 3.6
S2 = 5.3 – 1.2
= 3.3
S3 = 7.2 – 1.7
= 6.0
ii. Theoretical Calculation
Lx = b
Ly = d/2 (for s1 and s2)
Lz = a – c (for s1 and s2)
F=Lxt
L = √Lx2 + Ly2 + Lz2
Part 2:
Dimension a = 350mm, b = 455mm, c = 274mm, d = 367mm
1. Load = 5N
Member Lx Ly Lz L(mm) T Force(N) Remark
S1 455 184 76 496.49 0.013 6.45 Tension
S2 455 -184 76 496.49 0.013 6.45 Tension
S3 455 0 274 531.13 -0.025 -13.28 Compression
Force(N) 0 0 -5 - - - -
3. Load = 15N
Member Lx Ly Lz L(mm) T Force(N) Remark
S1 455 184 76 496.49 0.038 18.87 Tension
S2 455 -184 76 496.49 0.038 18.87 Tension
S3 455 0 274 531.13 -0.076 -40.37 Compression
Force(N) 0 0 -5 - - - -
5. Load = 25N
Member Lx Ly Lz L(mm) t Force(N) Remark
S1 455 184 76 496.49 0.063 31.28 Tension
S2 455 -184 76 496.49 0.063 31.28 Tension
S3 455 0 274 531.13 -0.126 -66.92 Compression
Force(N) 0 0 -5 - - - -
Load = 15N
Dynamometer Reading Force (N)
Load
S1 S2 S3 Experimental Theory
(N)
Unloaded Loaded Unloaded Loaded Unloaded Loaded S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3
5 -0.4 -5 -8.2 -12.8 10.9 19.4 -4.6 -4.6 8.5 12.16 12.16 -23.55
10 -0.4 -8.9 -8.2 -16.6 10.9 26.4 -8.5 -8.4 15.5 11.64 11.64 -23.05
15 -0.4 -12.7 -8.2 -20.5 10.9 33.4 -12.3 -12.3 22.5 35.94 35.94 -71.16
20 -0.4 -16.6 -8.2 -24.4 10.9 40.5 -16.2 -16.2 29.6 48.10 48.10 -95.23
25 -0.4 -20.4 -8.2 -28.2 10.9 47.4 -20 -20 36.5 60.26 60.26 -119.83
Dimension a = 350 mm
Dimension b = 470 mm
Dimension c = 230 mm
Dimension d = 420 mm
9.0 DISCUSSION
According to the graphs, the result in graph 1 and graph 2 are almost the same where there is just a little difference in the experimental values.
Meanwhile, the theory forces for S3 are in negative values which indicate that the forces are compression force and the negative sign is ignored
when plotting the graph. Based on the three graphs that been plotted, we can observe that the force is directly proportional to the applied load.
When the load increased, the force in each member also increased.
The discrepancy in the results might due to mistakes and errors such as parallax errors and carelessness during the experiment. Besides that, the
condition of the apparatus also may cause the discrepancy in the results such that the space frame apparatus is used for many times might affects
the accuracy and the dynamometer is not well calibrated.
10.0 CONCLUSION
Based on the results, we are able to verify member forces with tension coefficient method and can conclude that the force in all members is
directly proportional to the applied load. In addition, the accuracy of the results could be improved with better equipment.
11.0 REFERENCE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_frame
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27381847/Space-Full-Report
http://www.uzkom.com.tr/e_t1.asp
http://citadelarch.com/new%20pdf/Space%20frame-08.pdf