Scribd
Upload
32K views122 pages

Super Man's MySpace Blog - 1

The document is a blog post from Super Man's MySpace blog. It contains the blog header and navigation links on the left side, and the main blog content on the right. The blog discusses a theory about wormholes, as the title indicates it will contain a new post about wormhole theory. Scripts and styles are included to control the layout and appearance of the blog.

Uploaded by

SUPERALEXtheGREATEST
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
32K views122 pages

Super Man's MySpace Blog - 1

The document is a blog post from Super Man's MySpace blog. It contains the blog header and navigation links on the left side, and the main blog content on the right. The blog discusses a theory about wormholes, as the title indicates it will contain a new post about wormhole theory. Scripts and styles are included to control the layout and appearance of the blog.

Uploaded by

SUPERALEXtheGREATEST
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 122

<!

--GLOBAL-->
<html class="noJS en-US">
<!-- BlogListAll -->
<head><title>
Super Man's MySpace Blog |
</title>
<script type="text/javascript">document.documentElement.className = document
.documentElement.className.replace(/noJS/, 'hasJS');</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/jsapi"></scrip


t>
<script type="text/javascript">
google.load("language", "1");
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://js.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/stat


ic/js/blogv2_kzesnkfl.js"></script>

<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
var MySpace = {};
var MySpaceRes = {};
MySpaceRes.Header = {"ErrorMessage":"Sorry! an unexpected error has occurred.\u0
03cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003eThis error has been forwarded to MySpace\u0027s tec
hnical group.","Cancel":"Cancel / Cancelación","Continue":"Continue / Continuar"};
MySpaceRes.Common = {"Listing":"Listing {0}-{1} of {2}","OfNoSpaces":"of","Prev"
:"Previous","Next":"Next","Yes":"Yes","No":"No","Ok":"Ok","Attention":"Attention
"};
MySpaceRes.ProfileEdit = {"EditorLoading":"Loading..."};
MySpaceRes.AccountSettings = {"AnErrorOccurredPleaseTryAgain":"An error occurred
while processing your request. Please try again in a few minutes."};
MySpace.ClientContext = {"UserId":415169779,"DisplayFriendId":415169779,"IsLogge
dIn":true,"FunctionalContext":"BlogListAll","UserType":1};
MySpace.StaticContentBase='http://x.myspacecdn.com';
var MySpaceClientContext = {"UserId":415169779,"DisplayFriendId":4151697
79,"IsLoggedIn":true,"FunctionalContext":"BlogListAll","UserType":1};
MySpaceClientContext.PreferredCulture = 'en-US';
MySpace.ClientMaintenanceConfigs = {"asyncphotobrowsecaching":0,"msplink
sconvertall":0,"photocommentsajax":0,"inf_ind_newvideocomment":0,"musicjv_amazon
inplace":0,"enablevideocategorydropdown":0,"applications_userapppreferences":0,"
inf_ind_unreadim":0,"webimtestclient":0,"applications_showafterloaduhp":0,"appli
cations_showafterloadprofiles":0,"applications_enablev2settingspopup":0,"musicjv
_allmyplaylists":0,"inf_ind_newclassified":0,"webimclientrichtexteditor":0,"mdpc
ontaineruseopencanvas":0,"inf_ind_newautotag":0,"applications_enableopenidpopuph
andling":0,"applications_removeonappprofile":0,"friendselectorinstatusmooddialog
":0,"musicjv_debug":0,"photoquickpostmessaging":0,"mdp_enable_homeappnavdragdrop
":0,"musicjv_stoprefresh_medrec":0,"mystuffautos":0,"mystuffreportabusepost":0,"
mystuffuploadphotos":0,"dwbeaconclientv2":0,"dwbeaconpymk":0,"dwbeaconmailv2":0,
"mdp_rpcsetauthtoken":0,"mmt_usebigpipeuniveralid":0,"eventrouterrelayclient":0,
"eventrouterdatarelayclient":0,"signup_addrecommendationv2_deafultselectall":0,"
appnotification_useosmltemplatename":0,"webimofflineindicatorsupport":0,"musicjv
_mymusicv2_newscroll":0,"signup_strengthmeter":0,"dwbeaconphotossites":0,"testva
lidationofkey":0,"core_indicatorcounters":0,"topicsfriendstabfollowerssimple":0,
"reshareallactivities":0};
MySpace.ClientIntMaintenanceConfigs = {};
//]]>
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
MySpace.Ads = {};
MySpace.Ads.Account = {"Type":"1"};
MySpace.AdsPD = "1:1:IhpIs72Qu6TmTEOC5bAUjNpYlFAkkioPeltqMab13bA4heAGAr1AfhWyFRn
Acbq7ElPqIcIQObsqAcyUmDCaDw";
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://cms.myspacecdn.com/cms/js/ad
_wrapper0159.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://js.myspacecdn.com/modules/common/stat
ic/js/atlas/myspace_rvhl-aa-.js"></script>
<style type="text/css">
div.googlehdr a.spLinks { float: none; padding: 0; }
div.googlehdr:after { content: "."; display: block; height: 0; clear: both; visi
bility: hidden; }
.ie7 div.googlehdr { min-height: 1px; }
.ie6 div.googlehdr { height: 1%; }
div.googleafc div.quad a.spLinks { float: none; }
</style><link rel="canonical" href="http://blogs.myspace.com/_-_-_super-man_-_-_
" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/com
mon/static/css/uploadcontrol_ioe1imsn.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blo
gv2/static/css/viewblog_apphyenr.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/com
mon/static/css/global_-cca62xx.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/mys
tuff/static/css/myrating_uoxej1in.css" />
</head>
<body>

<form name="aspnetForm" method="post" action="/_-_-_super-man_-_-_/blog?


page=1" id="aspnetForm">
<div>
<input type="hidden" name="__VIEWSTATE" id="__VIEWSTATE" value="/wEPDwUIMjM3OTUz
ODFkGAEFRWN0bDAwJGN0bDAwJGNwTWFpbiRjcE1haW4kQWRMZWFkZXJCb2FyZCRtdXNpY0hlYWRlcjEk
TXVzaWNKVk11bHRpVmlldw8PZAIBZA==" />
</div>

<meta name="description" content="Read Super Mans MySpace Blog! New blog to


pics added every minute.Wormhole Theory 03" />
<style type="text/css">
Body{text-align:center;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;font-size:1
1px;text-decoration:none;background-attachment:fixed;background-color:#FFFFFF;ba
ckground-image:;background-position:center;background-repeat:no-repeat;}
:link{font-family:Verdana;color:#003399;font-size:11px;text-decoration:underline
;}
a:link{font-family:Verdana;color:#003399;font-size:#form.BODY_FONT_SIZE#;x-small
;text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited{font-family:Verdana;color:#003399;font-size:11px;text-decoration:under
line;}
a:active{font-family:Verdana;color:#003399;font-size:11px;text-decoration:none;}
table.main{width:90%;border:none;}
table.main TD,table.main TR{border:none;}table.nav{font-family:Verdana;color:#00
0000;font-size:11px;}
table.header{width:100%;background-color:#D5E8FB;border:1px solid;border-color:#
000000;}
table.header TH{font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;font-size:xx-large;text-decora
tion:none;font-weight:normal;border:none;}
table.header TD{font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;font-size:11px;text-decoration
:none;border:none;}
table.profile{width:100%;border:1px solid;border-color:#B1D0F0;background-color:
#FFFFFF;text-align:center;}
table.profile TD{font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;font-size:11px;text-decoratio
n:none;border:none;}
table.blog{width:100%;font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;word-wrap
:break-word;background-color:#B1D0F0;}
.blogTimeStamp{font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;font-weight:bold
;background-color:#B1D0F0;text-align:left;}
.blogSubject{font-size:11px;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;font-weight:bold;}
.blogContent{font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;font-weight:normal
;}
.blogContentInfo{font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;font-weight:no
rmal;}
.blogCommentsProfile{width:25%;font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;
font-weight:bold;background-color:#FF9933;text-align:center;}
.blogComments{background-color:#F9D6B4;}
.blogCommentsContent{font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000000;}
.spacer{height:2;background-color:#FFFFFF;}
.commentSpacer{height:2;background-color:#FFFFFF;}#footer{background-color:#FFFF
FF;}
</style>
<!--- user's additional customized style sheet --->
<style type="text/css">
</style>

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center" style="background-color:#F


FF">
<tr>
<td style="border:1px solid #000;">
<a href="http://myspace.com" id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_AdLeaderB
oard_myspaceLogoImageLink" title="MySpace"><img src="http://x.myspacecdn.com/mod
ules/blogv2/static/img/ms-bloglogo.gif" id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_AdLeaderBo
ard_Img1" alt="MySpace" style="border:0;" /></a>
</td>
<td id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_AdLeaderBoard_blogLeaderBoard" style="
border:1px solid #000;">
<div id="tkn_leaderboard"><iframe width="0" height="0" marginwidth="
0" marginheight="0" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowTr
ansparency="true" src=""></iframe></div><script type="text/javascript" >
Advertiser.SDC.DisplayedFriendEUD = "::0:0:ZGU1ODFhMDA3ZmE4OWQwZQvtBjALJ0IHoaW26
6aq4iXR3Cw1CexZKLVgxJdjh8_y2ttyb_Ki-X-LwihgkpQD8vYDaA1TgaWhOVrWMfsY_yje2zpcely-m
lYPLox8yZQ3-cGuOdrKvPc";
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
sdc_wrapper("tkn_leaderboard", "/MySpaceBlog/BlogListAll,13000001", "Frame1");</
script>
</td>
</tr>
</table> <br />
</module></module>
<table class="main">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">

</module>
<br/>
<table class="nav" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacin
g="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="right">

<div id="blog_content" class="blogControlTitleDiv">


<div id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_ViewBlogHeaderBar_blogContentLinks" class
="blogContentLink">
<a href="http://home.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user">home</a>
|

<a href="http://messaging.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=mail.inboxV3&
confirm={0}">mail</a>
|
<a href="http://blogs.myspace.com/Modules/BlogV2/Pages/RssFeed.aspx?frie
ndID=415169779">rss</a>
|
<a href="http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=signout">sign out</
a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear"></div></module></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="20%">

<table class="profile">
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center;">
<b><a href="http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.vie
wprofile&friendid=415169779">Super Man</a></b><br />
<a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_UserInfo_profileLink" href="http://
profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&amp;friendid=415169779
"><img id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_UserInfo_Picture" src="http://c4.ac-images.
myspacecdn.com/images02/51/s_23615315e2304358b285b9369fef6af3.jpg" style="border
-width:0px;" /></a> <br />
<div style="text-align:center" class="blogRealName">Super Man</div>
<br /><br />
<span class="userInfoBlog">
<span id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_UserInfo_LastUpdatedDate"><b
>Last Updated: </b>8/31/2010</span>
<br /><br />
<a href="http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.crea
te&editor=True" id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_UserInfo_PostBlogLink">Post New Bl
og<br /></a><a href="http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.controlc
enter" id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_UserInfo_ManageBlogLink">Manage Blog<br /><
/a><a href="http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.customize" id="ct
l00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_UserInfo_CustomizeBlogLink">Customize Blog<br /></a><a h
ref="http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.email&friendId=415169779
" id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_UserInfo_ForwardLink">Email to a Friend<br /></a
>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

<br />
<table class="profile" >
<tr>
<td>
<b>Gender</b>: Male<br />
<b>Status</b>: Single<br />
<b>Age</b>: 101<br />
<b>Sign</b>: Virgo<br /><br/>
<b>City</b>: BROOKLYN<br />
<b>Country</b>: US<br />
<b>Signup Date</b>: 9/19/2008
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<style>
.blogDateSortby { font-size:1px;white-space:nowrap;}
.blogDateSortby select { font-size:10px;}
.blogDateSortby input {padding:2px;overflow:hidden;font-size:10px;border:1px sol
id #ccc;margin-left:3px;}
</style>
<table class="profile" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<div class="profileTitle"><b>Blog Archive</b></div>
<span class="myBlogGroupLink">[<a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_MyBl
ogArchives_btnOlder" href="http://www.myspace.com/_-_-_super-man_-_-_/blog?page=
2">Older</a>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_MyBlogArchives_btnNewer" disabled="
disabled">Newer</a>]</span> <br />
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" st
yle="margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:4px;">
<tr>
<td>
<div class="blogDateSortby">
<div>
<select name="ddMonth" id="ddMonth">
<option value="1">Jan</option>
<option value="2">Feb</option>
<option value="3">Mar</option>
<option value="4">Apr</option>
<option value="5">May</option>
<option value="6">Jun</option>
<option value="7">Jul</option>
<option value="8">Aug</option>
<option value="9">Sep</option>
<option selected="selected" value="10">Oct</option>
<option value="11">Nov</option>
<option value="12">Dec</option>
</select>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<select name="ddDay" id="ddDay">
<option value="1">1</option>
<option value="2">2</option>
<option value="3">3</option>
<option value="4">4</option>
<option value="5">5</option>
<option value="6">6</option>
<option value="7">7</option>
<option value="8">8</option>
<option value="9">9</option>
<option value="10">10</option>
<option value="11">11</option>
<option value="12">12</option>
<option value="13">13</option>
<option value="14">14</option>
<option value="15">15</option>
<option value="16">16</option>
<option value="17">17</option>
<option selected="selected" value="18">18</option>
<option value="19">19</option>
<option value="20">20</option>
<option value="21">21</option>
<option value="22">22</option>
<option value="23">23</option>
<option value="24">24</option>
<option value="25">25</option>
<option value="26">26</option>
<option value="27">27</option>
<option value="28">28</option>
<option value="29">29</option>
<option value="30">30</option>
<option value="31">31</option>
</select>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<select name="ddYear" id="ddYear">
<option value="1981">1981</option>
<option value="1982">1982</option>
<option value="1983">1983</option>
<option value="1984">1984</option>
<option value="1985">1985</option>
<option value="1986">1986</option>
<option value="1987">1987</option>
<option value="1988">1988</option>
<option value="1989">1989</option>
<option value="1990">1990</option>
<option value="1991">1991</option>
<option value="1992">1992</option>
<option value="1993">1993</option>
<option value="1994">1994</option>
<option value="1995">1995</option>
<option value="1996">1996</option>
<option value="1997">1997</option>
<option value="1998">1998</option>
<option value="1999">1999</option>
<option value="2000">2000</option>
<option value="2001">2001</option>
<option value="2002">2002</option>
<option value="2003">2003</option>
<option value="2004">2004</option>
<option value="2005">2005</option>
<option value="2006">2006</option>
<option value="2007">2007</option>
<option value="2008">2008</option>
<option value="2009">2009</option>
<option selected="selected" value="2010">2010</option>
<option value="2011">2011</option>
<option value="2012">2012</option>
<option value="2013">2013</option>
<option value="2014">2014</option>
<option value="2015">2015</option>
<option value="2016">2016</option>
<option value="2017">2017</option>
<option value="2018">2018</option>
<option value="2019">2019</option>
<option value="2020">2020</option>
<option value="2021">2021</option>
<option value="2022">2022</option>
<option value="2023">2023</option>
<option value="2024">2024</option>
<option value="2025">2025</option>
<option value="2026">2026</option>
<option value="2027">2027</option>
<option value="2028">2028</option>
<option value="2029">2029</option>
<option value="2030">2030</option>
<option value="2031">2031</option>
<option value="2032">2032</option>
<option value="2033">2033</option>
<option value="2034">2034</option>
<option value="2035">2035</option>
<option value="2036">2036</option>
<option value="2037">2037</option>
<option value="2038">2038</option>
<option value="2039">2039</option>
<option value="2040">2040</option>
<option value="2041">2041</option>
<option value="2042">2042</option>
<option value="2043">2043</option>
<option value="2044">2044</option>
<option value="2045">2045</option>
<option value="2046">2046</option>
<option value="2047">2047</option>
<option value="2048">2048</option>
<option value="2049">2049</option>
<option value="2050">2050</option>
<option value="2051">2051</option>
<option value="2052">2052</option>
<option value="2053">2053</option>
<option value="2054">2054</option>
<option value="2055">2055</option>
<option value="2056">2056</option>
<option value="2057">2057</option>
<option value="2058">2058</option>
<option value="2059">2059</option>
<option value="2060">2060</option>
<option value="2061">2061</option>
<option value="2062">2062</option>
<option value="2063">2063</option>
<option value="2064">2064</option>
<option value="2065">2065</option>
<option value="2066">2066</option>
<option value="2067">2067</option>
<option value="2068">2068</option>
<option value="2069">2069</option>
<option value="2070">2070</option>
<option value="2071">2071</option>
<option value="2072">2072</option>
<option value="2073">2073</option>
<option value="2074">2074</option>
<option value="2075">2075</option>
<option value="2076">2076</option>
<option value="2077">2077</option>
<option value="2078">2078</option>
<option value="2079">2079</option>
<option value="2080">2080</option>
<option value="2081">2081</option>
<option value="2082">2082</option>
<option value="2083">2083</option>
<option value="2084">2084</option>
<option value="2085">2085</option>
<option value="2086">2086</option>
<option value="2087">2087</option>
<option value="2088">2088</option>
<option value="2089">2089</option>
<option value="2090">2090</option>
<option value="2091">2091</option>
<option value="2092">2092</option>
<option value="2093">2093</option>
<option value="2094">2094</option>
<option value="2095">2095</option>
<option value="2096">2096</option>
<option value="2097">2097</option>
<option value="2098">2098</option>
<option value="2099">2099</option>
</select>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td class="blogDateSortby"><input type="submit" name="ctl00$
ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$MyBlogArchives$btnGo" value="Go" id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMa
in_MyBlogArchives_btnGo" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</module></module></module></module></module><div style="height: 20px;">
</div>
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" >if (document.getElementByI
d("googleAdDefaultDiv") == null) document.write("<div id='googleAdDefaultDiv'></
div>");</script>
</placement></td>
<td width="5">
<img height="1" border="0" width
="5" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"/>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="80%">
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00
$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField1" id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogLi
st_HiddenField1" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField2" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField2" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField3" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField3" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField4" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField4" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField5" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField5" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField6" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField6" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField7" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField7" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField8" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField8" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField9" id="
ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField9" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField10" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField10" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField11" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField11" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField12" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField12" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField13" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField13" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField14" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField14" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField15" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField15" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField16" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField16" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField17" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField17" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField18" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField18" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField19" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField19" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField20" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField20" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField21" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField21" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField22" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField22" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField23" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField23" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField24" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField24" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField25" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField25" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField26" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField26" />
<input type="hidden" name="ctl00$ctl00$cpMain$cpMain$BlogList$HiddenField27" id=
"ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_HiddenField27" />

<table class="blog" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" id="BlogTable">

<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
October 16, 2010 - Saturday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_539942604">Wormhole Theory</label>
</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_539942604" class="blogContent"><a title="View Wormhole Theory 03 on Scrib
d" href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnNjcmliZC5jb20vZG9jLzM5NDYzMzk
xL1dvcm1ob2xlLVRoZW9yeS0wMw==" style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: H
elvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight
: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-str
etch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;"
target="_blank">Wormhole Theory 03</a> <object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11c
f-96b8-444553540000" id="doc_239662577050996" height="600" width="100%">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" />
<param name="allowNetworking" value="internal" />
<param name="movie" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?documen
t_id=39463391&access_key=key-1qa7l5v2xykjo7geznf9&page=1&viewMode=list" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
<param name="bgcolor" value="&#035;ffffff" />
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" name="doc_239662577050996" allowScri
ptAccess="never" allowNetworking="internal" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/Scri
bdViewer.swf?document_id=39463391&access_key=key-1qa7l5v2xykjo7geznf9&page=1&vie
wMode=list" height="600" width="100%" wmode="transparent" bgcolor="&#035;ffffff"
/>
<param value="transparent" name="wmode"/></object></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=539942604'>6
:43 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=539942604' i
d='cmtCount_539942604'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_539942604'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount1'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl01_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(539942604);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_539942604" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 539942604);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 539942604);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 539942604);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5399426
04);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 539942604);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 539942604);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 539942604);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53994260
4);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 539942604);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 539942604);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 539942604);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 539942604);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 539942604);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 539942604);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 539942604);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 539942604);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
39942604);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 539942604);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 539942604);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 539942604);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53994260
4);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 539942604);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 539942604);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 539942604);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 539942604
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 539942604);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 539942604);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 539942604);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53994260
4);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 539942604);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 539942604);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 539942604);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 539942604
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 539942604);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 539942604);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 539942604);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 539942604);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 539942604);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 539942604);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 539942604);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 539942604);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=False&blogId=539942604'>E
dit</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=539942604'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
October 15, 2010 - Friday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_539916366">Wormhole Theory, an addendum to the Origins series, c
ourtesy of David Rountree</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_539916366" class="blogContent"><p align="center" class="MsoNormal">
</p><p align="center" class="MsoNormal">
<p align="center" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0
pt;font-family:Arial">Wormhole Theory</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.15in;&&#035;xd;&&#035
;xa;margin-left:0in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:1
2.0pt;font-family:Arial">Ronnie Chen
of </font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa; Arial">Hampton</font>..<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12
.0pt;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial"> </font>..<font size="undefined" st
yle="font-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial">University</font>
....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial"> wrote in
a recent article that </font><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font
-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">“Although Einstein's General Relativity th
eory allows wormholes to
exist, physicists have been trying for decades to construct them mathematically
without breaking any other laws of physics. Most researchers agree that wormhole
s
require "exotic matter", stuff that is repelled by gravity, rather
than attracted, but some have claimed ways around that problem. Now a report in
the 27 July </font>..<i><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd
;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">PRL</font></i>..<font si
ze="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family
:"> shows that all wormholes, no matter how cleverly constructed,
require exotic matter; a condition that many in the field are already working
to satisfy. </font></p>
<p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.15in;&&#035;xd;&&#035
;xa;margin-left:0in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:1
2.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">Matt Visse
r of </font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial
;mso-fareast-font-family:">Washington</font>..<font size="undefined" style="font
-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:"> <
/font>..<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-far
east-font-family:">University</font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:"> in </font>....<font size="un
defined" style="font-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial;mso-far
east-font-family:">St.
Louis</font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:&&#
035;xd;&&#035;xa;Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">, states that “The
good news about Lorentzian wormholes is that after about ten years of hard work
we cannot prove that they don't exist." But a publication five years ago
(J.L. Friedmann, K. Schleich, and D.M. Witt, </font><a href="http://www.msplinks
.com/MDFodHRwOi8vbGluay5hcHMub3JnL2Fic3RyYWN0L1BSTC92NzEvcDE0ODYv" target="_blan
k"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;font-famil
y:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">Phys. Rev. Lett. <b>71</b>,
1486 (1993)</font></a><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family
:Arial">)</font><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial
;mso-fareast-font-family:"> showed that a large class of wormholes require exoti
c matter to
keep them open. As stated, researchers haven't given up, however, because
exotic matter, the magic ingredient which has less energy than a pure vacuum,
actually <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">does </i>exist, at least in
small amounts, thanks to the ghostly virtual particles in certain quantum
physics experiments. </font></p>
<p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.15in;&&#035;xd;&&#035
;xa;margin-left:0in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:1
2.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">However, n
o one knows if enough exotic matter
can exist in a concentration dense enough in a spatial area to create a large
enough wormhole to constitute multi-universal travel or trans-universal travel.
An attempt to sidestep the problem, a number of theorists have claimed to
construct special wormholes that do not require exotic matter. In their </font>.
.<i><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast
-font-family:">PRL</font></i>..<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;&&
#035;xd;&&#035;xa;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">
paper, Visser and David Hochberg, of the Laboratory for Space Astrophysics and
Fundamental Physics in </font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt
;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">Madrid</font>
..<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-f
ont-family:">, </font>..<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd
;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">Spain</font>....<font s
ize="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-famil
y:">, show that all wormholes, even time-dependent and asymmetric
ones, require exotic matter, which in turn requires quantum mechanical effects.
Visser is quoted as saying "You cannot just get away with normal classical
physics," Visser and Chen blame many of the contrary claims on the
widespread confusion about the precise definition of a wormhole and the concept
of "passing through" it. </font></p>
<p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.15in;&&#035;xd;&&#035
;xa;margin-left:0in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:1
2.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">Their appr
oach was to rigorously define a
wormhole "throat" (the narrowest point) and show that because light
rays spread out as they emerge from it, there must be a kind of
"antigravity", the hallmark of exotic matter. In the process they
found that time dependent wormholes actually have <i>two</i> throats, one for
each direction of traffic, and they say that was one source of the confusion: A
theoretical traveler could paradoxically pass the middle of the wormhole
without actually reaching the throat for their direction. Part of the problem
is the lack of a good physical picture for a dynamic wormhole, which is a
complicated four-dimensional object; the usual image we see displayed in
magazines and on the web only works for wormholes that don't change in time. (se
e
below)</font></p>
<p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.15in;&&#035;xd;&&#035
;xa;margin-left:0in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:1
2.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">Eanna Flan
agan, of </font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:A
rial;mso-fareast-font-family:">Cornell</font>..<font size="undefined" style="fon
t-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">
</font>..<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fa
reast-font-family:">University</font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size
:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:"> has stated that the require
ment of exotic matter has been
"pretty well understood in the community," despite the number of
contrary papers and the lack of an air-tight proof. But the new work covers the
bases quite explicitly by showing that requirement in a new and interesting way
that supplements previous work, while also clarifying errors in other research.
</font></p>
<p style="margin-top: 6pt; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.15in; margin-left
: 0in" align="center" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:
&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..........................
..
..
..........
..
....</font></p>
<p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.15in;&&#035;xd;&&#035
;xa;margin-left:0in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:1
2.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">This is a
huge discovery from where I stand.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">What I have
been playing around with is rather simple; Most physicists I have spoken to,
openly acknowledge the existence of millions of wormholes are most likely occurr
ing
at the Planck level. We don’t notice them because they are so small. In fact
most of them exist at a sub-atomic level; so what if, two tiny strings approach
each other. Much like what happens in the music store, when you strum an
acoustic guitar string, all the other guitars begin to resonate their strings
at the exact frequency of the guitar string you strummed. So IF, as the two
strings approach each other, they begin to match frequencies, until they
intertwine at resonance. This could be the genesis of the formation of a
wormhole. If there is spatial area between two universes, and it doesn’t have
to be much, it is very probably that this spatial area is made up of exotic
matter, separating the universes under normal conditions. But if, as these wormh
oles
form, the exotic matter is introduced into the forming throats, they will
stabilize into a fully connected conduit, gapping the spatial separation, be it
space, time or what have you.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">The Type I
string theory has vibrating strings like the rest of the string theories. These
strings vibrate both in closed loops, so that the strings have no ends, and as <
i>open
strings</i> with two loose ends. The open loose strings are what separates the
Type I string theory from the other four string theories. This was a feature
that the other string theories did not contain (The Type IIA and Type IIB
string theories also contain open strings, however these strings are bound).
But then I also take into account supergravity.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">Supergravity
theories were classified by Werner Nahm. In 10 dimensions, there are only two
supergravity theories, which are denoted Type IIA and Type IIB. This similar
denomination is not a coincidence; the Type IIA string theory has the Type IIA
supergravity theory as its low-energy limit and the Type IIB string theory
gives rise to Type IIB supergravity. The heterotic SO(32) and heterotic E8×E8
string theories also reduce to Type IIA and Type IIB supergravity in the
low-energy limit. This suggests that there may indeed be a relation between the
heterotic/Type I theories and the Type II theories. </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">String
theory includes both open strings, which have two distinct endpoints, and
closed strings making a complete loop. The two types of string behave in
slightly different ways, yielding two different spectra. For example, in most
string theories, one of the closed string modes is the <i>graviton</i>, and one
of the open string modes is the<i> photon</i>. Because the two ends of an open
string can always meet and connect, forming a closed string, there are no
string theories without closed strings. But no one has suggested that strings
can also pair, form a duality, and co-resonate. And still better, there is
nothing really in any of the theories that prevents this from occurring.</font><
/p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">Edward
Witten outlined the following relationship: </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">The Type
IIA supergravity (corresponding to the heterotic SO(32) and Type IIA string
theories) can be obtained by dimensional reduction from the single unique
eleven-dimensional supergravity theory. This means that if one studied
supergravity on an eleven-dimensional spacetime that looks like the product of
a ten-dimensional spacetime with another very small one-dimensional manifold,
one gets the Type IIA supergravity theory. (And the Type IIB supergravity
theory can be obtained by using T-duality.) However, eleven-dimensional
supergravity is not consistent on its own, it just doesn’t make sense at
extremely high energy, and likely requires some form of completion. It seems
plausible, then, that there is some quantum theory (M-theory) in eleven-dimensio
ns
which gives rise at low energies to eleven-dimensional supergravity, and is
related to ten-dimensional string theory by dimensional reduction. Dimensional
reduction to a circle yields the Type IIA string theory, and dimensional
reduction to a line segment yields the heterotic SO(32) string theory. String
theory has its origins in the dual resonance model that was first proposed by
Gabriele Veneziano which described the strongly interacting hadrons as strings.
But strings are associated with subatomic particles, but what if the string
like manifestation is a more universal concept?</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">It is a
fundamental fact of the physics of light that, the more energy a photon
carries, the smaller a wavelength it has. For instance, visible light has a
wavelength of around a few hundred nanometers, while the much more energetic
gamma rays have a wavelength about the size of an atomic nucleus. The Planck
energy and the Planck length are related in that a photon would need to have a
Planck-scale energy value in order to have a wavelength as small as the Planck
length. </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">To make
things even more complicated, even if we could create a photon this energetic,
we could not use it to precisely measure something at the Planck scale as it
would be so energetic that the photon would collapse into a black hole before
it returned any information. Thus, many physicists believe that the Planck
scale represents some sort of fundamental limit on how small the distances we
can probe are. We have of course talked at length about this. The Planck length
may be the smallest physically meaningful size scale there is, in which case
(and Allen will groove on this)€ the universe can be thought of as a
tapestry of “pixels” each a Planck length in diameter. </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">The Planck
energy scale is almost unimaginably large, while the Planck size scale is
almost unimaginably small. The Planck energy is about a quintillion times
larger than the energies achievable in our very best particle accelerators,
which are used to create and observe exotic subatomic particles. A particle
accelerator powerful enough to probe the Planck scale directly would need to
have a circumference similar in size to the orbit of Mars, constructed from
about as much material as our Moon. </font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">Since such
a particle accelerator is not likely to be built in the foreseeable future,
physicists look to other methods for probing the Planck scale. One is looking
for <i>gigantic “cosmic strings”</i> which may have been created when the
universe as a whole was so hot and small that it had Planck-level energies.
This would have occurred in the first trillionth of a second after the Big
Bang. Or the Big Pour In. But more on that in my paper on the Megaverse.</font><
/p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">Now here is
the real poser. Not all strings are Planck level strings. Hence,€a 2 meter
opening may not be all that rare of an occurrence as we might think. It just
takes a whole lot more energy to form it. But let’s take a side trip into the
phenomena known as the Quantum Vortex.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">In physics,
a quantum vortex is a topological defect exhibited in superfluids and
superconductors. The existence of these quantum vortices were independently
predicted by Richard Feynman and Alexei Alexeyevich Abrikosov in the 1950s.
They were later observed experimentally in Type-II superconductors, liquid
helium, and atomic gases. I know this seems like a wandering off course, but
bear with me for a little bit.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">A quantum
vortex in a superfluid is different to one in a superconductor. The key
similarity is that they are both topological defects, and they are both
quantized. In addition, the makeup of each quantum vortex is neither superfluid
nor superconductor, for each system. In a superfluid, a quantum vortex
"carries" the angular momentum, thus allowing the superfluid to
rotate; in a superconductor, the vortex carries the magnetic flux. This is an
important thing or two things to keep in mind. So let’s go into a little
deeper. It is vitally important for us to understand quantum effects in
materials we can observe and record, so that we might apply them to areas in
which we can’t, at least, not yet anyway. So try to stick with me on this.</font><
/p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><font size="undefine
d" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial">Vortex in a superfluid</font></b><
/p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">In a
superfluid, a quantum vortex is a hole with the superfluid circulating around
the vortex; the inside of the vortex may contain excited particles, air,
vacuum, or possibly Mickey Mouse, it doesn’t really matter. What <i style="mso-bid
i-font-style:normal">does </i>matter, however, is that the
thickness of the vortex <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><i style="mso-bid
i-font-style:normal">depends</i></b> upon the chemical make-up of
the superfluid; in liquid helium, the thickness is on the order of a few
Angstroms.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">A
superfluid has the special property of having <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:&&#0
35;xd;&&#035;xa;normal">phase</i>, given by the wavefunction, and the velocity o
f the
superfluid is proportional to the gradient of the phase. The circulation around
any closed loop in the superfluid is zero, if the region enclosed is simply
connected. The superfluid is deemed irrotational. However, if the enclosed
region actually contains a smaller region that is an absence of superfluid, for
example a rod through the superfluid or a vortex, then the circulation is
mathematically,</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
Arial">..€..</font></p>
<p style="margin-left:.5in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font
-size:12.0pt;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">..
..
....</font></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">where
<span style="mso-no-proof:yes">..
..
....</span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes">€</span>is Planck s constant divided
by 2π, m is the mass of the suerfluid article, and Δφ is the phase di erence
around the vortex. Because the wave unction must return to its same value a ter
an integral number o  turns around the vortex (similar to what is described in
the Bohr model), then Δφ = 2π<i>n</i>, where n is an integer. Thus, we find
that the circulation is quantized:</font></>
< style="margin-left:.5in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font
-size:12.0t;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">..
..
....</font></>
< class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:
Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">..€..</font></>
< class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:
Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">Now before you run away clut
ching your head looking for the
Aleve, let’s exlore this effect in a suerconductor.</font></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa
;mso-outline-level:2" class="MsoNormal"><b><font size="undefined" style="font-si
ze:12.0t;font-family:Arial;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;mso-fareast-font-family:">Vortex
in a suerconductor</font></b></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">A
rincial roerty of suerconductors is that they exel magnetic fields; this
is called the Meissner effect. If the magnetic field becomes sufficiently
strong, one scenario is for the suerconductive state to be
"quenched". However, in some cases, it may be energetically favorable
for the suerconductor to form a quantum vortex, which carries a quantized
amount of magnetic flux through the suerconductor. Meanwhile, the
suerconductive state revails in the regions around the vortex. A
suerconductor that is caable of carrying a vortex is called a tye-II
suerconductor.</font></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">Over
some enclosed area S, the </font><a title="Magnetic flux" href="htt://www.msli
nks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vZW4ud2lraXBlZGlhLm9yZy93aWtL01hZ25ldGljX2ZsdXg=" target="_b
lank"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-farea
st-font-family:">magnetic flux</font></a><font size="undefined" style="font-size
:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">
is demonstrated by:</font></>
< style="margin-left:.5in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font
-size:12.0t;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">..
..
....</font><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-
fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">.</font></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">Substituting
a result of </font>....<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;&&#035;xd;
&&#035;xa; font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">London</font>....<font s
ize="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-famil
y:"> s
second equation: <san style="mso-no-roof:yes">..
..
....</san>, we discover that</font></>
< style="margin-left:.5in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font
-size:12.0t;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">..
..
....</font><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-
fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">,</font></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">where
<i>n<sub>s</sub></i>, <i>m</i>, and <i>e<sub>s</sub></i> are the number
density, mass and charge of the </font><a title="Cooer airs" href="htt://www.
mslinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vZW4ud2lraXBlZGlhLm9yZy93aWtL0Nvb3Blcl9wYWlycw==" targe
t="_blank"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-
fareast-font-family:">Cooer airs</font></a><font size="undefined" style="font-
size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">.</font></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">If
the region, S, is large enough so that <san style="mso-no-roof:yes">..
..
....</san>along <san style="mso-no-roof:yes">..
..
....</san>, then</font></>
< style="margin-left:.5in" class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font
-size:12.0t;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">..
..
....</font><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-
fareast-font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;">.</font></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">The
flow of current can cause vortices in a suerconductor to move. In some
circumstances, this leads to energy dissiation and causes the material to
dislay a small amount of electrical resistance while in the suerconducting
state</font></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa
;mso-outline-level:2" class="MsoNormal"><b><font size="undefined" style="font-si
ze:12.0t;font-family:Arial;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;mso-fareast-font-family:">Statis
tical Mechanics of Vortex
Lines</font></b></>
< style="mso-margin-to-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto" class="MsoNormal">
<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-fon
t-family:">If
the temerature is raised in a </font><a title="Suerfluid" href="htt://www.ms
links.com/MDFodHRwOi8vZW4ud2lraXBlZGlhLm9yZy93aWtL1N1cGVyZmx1aWQ=" target="_bla
nk"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast
-font-family:">suerfluid</font></a><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0
t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">
or a suerconductor, the vortex loos undergo a second-order hase transition.
This haens when the configurational entroy overcomes the Boltzmann factor
which suresses the thermal generation of vortex lines. The lines form a
condensate. Since the center of the lines, the vortex cores, are normal liquid
or normal conductors, resectively, the condensation transforms the </font><a ti
tle="Suerfluid" href="htt://www.mslinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vZW4ud2lraXBlZGlhLm9yZ
y93aWtL1N1cGVyZmx1aWQ=" target="_blank"><font size="undefined" style="font-size
:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:">suerfluid</font></a><font s
ize="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial;mso-fareast-font-famil
y:">
or suerconductor into the normal state. The ensembles of vortex lines and
their hase transitions can be described efficiently by a gauge theory. The
gauge theory has great similarity with the gauge theory of electrons and
hotons, the famous quantum electrodynamics (QED) and is therefore called
"quantum vortex dynamics" (QVD). </font></>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">Now I will rovide
the fly for the ointment, or rather, Geoff Haselhurst does this nicely in his
aer entitled “The Wave Structure of Matter (</san>..<san style="font-family:Ar
ial">WSM</san>..<san style="font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;Arial">) rovides
a more Simle & Sensible Descrition of Reality than
Vortex Theory”, of which I will shamelessly quote from now. Kee in mind, this
is his work, not my own.</san></div>
<h2 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">Eight
Arguments for Why Sace cannot Flow</san></h2>
<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">1.
Concet of Flowing / Liquids alies to matter.</san></h3>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">There are no
justifications for alying concet of flowing to sace itself. Flowing is an
emirical thing, not a metahysical thing and all hilosohers of science realiz
e
that reality is not founded on emirical things. (I would arguably disagree
with the term “all here” but for the sake of introducing the grit which will
eventually form the earl, let’s hear it out. – DR)</san></div>
< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">"Rather, they start this, dislaying it to the se
nses,
.... and go on to offer more or less rigorous demonstrations of the er se
attributes of their rorietary genera. This sort of rocedure is inductive and
it is as lain as a ikestaff that it does not amount to a demonstration of
essence or of what it is to be a thing." (Aristotle, Metahysics)<br />
"But also hilosohy is not about ercetible substances (they, you see,
are rone to destruction)" (Aristotle, Metahysics)</san></>
<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">2.
Flowing matter is understood as loosely bound wave centers in a nearly rigid
(wave medium) sace.</san></h3>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">The Wave Structure
of Matter exlains how liquids (and solids / gases) form due to the interaction
of the sherical In and Out-Waves in a nearly rigid sace / wave medium. Thus
there is no need to aly the concet of flowing to Sace itself.</san></div>
<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">3. For
Sace to flow it cannot be continuously connected, but must be made of loosely
connected arts</san></h3>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">This causes two
fundamental roblems for human knowledge;<br />
i) You are no longer describing reality from One substance thus you loose
necessary connection.<br />
ii) You must exlain what these arts are and how they are connected, which
requires assuming existence of many things.<br />
(Basically you are defeating the whole urose and beauty of </san>..<san styl
e="font-family:Arial">WSM</san>..<san style="font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;A
rial"> in exlaining how matter is interconnected - which is the central
roblem of article / field theories in sace time.)</san></div>

<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">4. You are


alying motion twice to sace, as Wave Motion and as Flowing Motion of Sace. <
/san></h3>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">It would be strang
e
indeed if, at the most fundamental level of reality, Motion existed in two
different forms, as both Wave Motion of Sace (which exlains flowing motion)
and also as flowing motion of Sace.</san></div>
<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">5. Thus
you are not abiding by Ockham s Razor, the most simle theory that exlains
most things is best.</san></h3>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">In fact you could
discuss ideas of flowing sace for the next 100 years and never resolve
anything, as it is obvious it will lead to<br />
endless difficulties. (And history shows this is true, vortex theories have
been around for centuries).</san></div>
<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">6. If
Sace flowed with lanets as they orbit / sin then our observations of the
universe would be affected.</san></h3>
<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">7.
Flowing Sace contradicts Einstein s relativity which is artly correct as
follows;</san></h3>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">i) Matter affects
Sace<br />
ii) Matter is sherically satially extended - not a article.<br />
iii) Sace-Time (really waves in Sace) is rigid.</san></div>
< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">Recaitulating, we may say that according to the
general
theory of relativity sace is endowed with hysical qualities; in this sense,<br
/>
therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity
sace without ether is unthinkable; for in such sace there not only would be
no roagation of light, but also no ossibility of existence for standards of
sace and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any sace-time
intervals in the hysical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as
endowed with the quality characteristic of onderable media, as consisting of
arts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion (i.e. flowing
motion of articles) may not be alied to it. (Albert Einstein, Leiden
Lecture, 1920)</san></>
< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">"The insearability of time and sace emerged in
connection with electrodynamics, or the law of roagation of light. With the
discovery of the relativity of simultaneity, sace and time were merged in a
single continuum in a way similar to that in which the three dimensions of
sace had reviously merged into a single continuum. Physical sace was thus
extended to a four dimensional sace which also included the dimension of time.
The four dimensional sace of the secial theory of relativity is just as rigid
and absolute as </san>....<san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;
color:windowtext">Newton</san>....<san style="font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;
Arial;color:windowtext"> s sace. (Albert Einstein, 1954)</san></>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">I should add that
Einstein was very close to the truth in realising that matter was not a
article but rather that matter, sace and time are all art of one thing. </s
an></div>

< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;


xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">When forced to summarize the general theory of re
lativity in
one sentence:<br />
Time and sace and gravitation have no searate existence from matter.(Albert
Einstein)</san></>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">His error was to
work with fields and describe matter as sherical fields in sacetime, rather
than sherical waves in sace. His matter curves sacetime is correct once you
realise that sacetime is waves in sace, and these waves do affect the
roerties of the wave medium (e.g. curving of waves / light as it roagates
ast sun.</san></div>

<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">(Also see other


science articles on Einstein below)</san></div>
<h3 style="background:white"><san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">8.
Finally, there is simly no emirical evidence to suort it. It does not
exlain anything that the </san>..<san style="mso-bidi-font-family:&&#035;xd;&
&#035;xa; Arial">WSM</san>..<san style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">
in rigid sace exlains.</san></h3>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">There is simly no
justification in introducing it as a concet.</san></div>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">And a 9th oint
about vortex theory. Matter interacts sherically, vortices do not exlain
this, the </san>..<san style="font-family:Arial">WSM</san>..<san style="font
-family:Arial"> does. Matter interacts with all other matter in
universe, vortex theory does not exlain this, </san>..<san style="font-family
:Arial">WSM</san>..<san style="font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;Arial"> does (w
ith mathematical recision).</san></div>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">While we can
certainly imagine flowing sace it is rudent to remember the words of
Leibniz;</san></div>
< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">... a distinction must be made between true and f
alse ideas,
and that too much rein must not be given to a man s (woman s) imagination under
retext of its being a clear and distinct intellection. (Leibniz, 1670)</san></
>

<div style="margin-left:20.25t;background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial


">-Fin-</san></div>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">Now let me retake
the wheel. But what if, the laws of Quantum vortex aly to “sace” simly
because sace exhibits the roerties of a suerfluid <i style="mso-bidi-font-st
yle:&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa;normal">as well as </i>a suerconductor? There is certai
nly evidence that both
conditions occur. One more quote first;</san></div>
< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">The Vortex Theory is based uon the hyothesis th
at time does
not exist as a fundamental rincile of the universe, but instead, only exists
as a henomenon created by motion, a “shadow” of motion. <br />
The imlications of this single hilosohical idea ossess disastrous
consequences for all of 20th Century science. Every belief based uon the idea
of time is at jeoardy. Esecially Einstein’s Theory of Relativity (Relativity
is based uon the existence of a fourth dimension called “SPACE-TIME!”). It was
realized that even </san>....<san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;xd;&&#035;xa
; color:windowtext">Newton</san>....<san style="font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;
xa;Arial;color:windowtext">’s laws needed to be looked at again.<br />
Although both Einstein and </san>....<san style="font-family:&&#035;xd;&&#035;
xa; Arial;color:windowtext">Newton</san>....<san style="font-family:Arial;col
or:windowtext"> were giants in the world of
science, their reasoning rocesses were both based uon time. They both
believed in time. Even though </san>....<san style="font-family:Arial;color:wi
ndowtext">Newton</san>....<san style="font-family:Arial;color:windowtext"> bel
ieved time was linear [the same
everywhere in the universe], and Einstein believed it was relative, the result
was the same – they both believed time was a real and fundamental rincile of
the universe. Because of this fact, they incororated it into their visions of
how the universe was constructed.</san></>
< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">But if time does not exist as a fundamental rinc
ile of the
universe, then Einstein’s fourth dimension of sace-time does not contain any
“Time” characteristics. Hence, it can no longer be used as an exlanation for
the length shrinkage and time dilation effects revealed by Michelson and
Morley’s famous exeriment.<br />
To correct this error, the true nature of time must first be discovered. Then
because time was used to exlain how matter, sace, energy, and the forces of
nature are constructed – we have to start all over again. But this “time”,
using the correct nature of time, we can rediscover how matter, sace, energy,
and the forces of nature are really constructed. So how do we do it? </san></>
< style="background:white" class="quote"><san style="font-family:Arial;&&#035;
xd;&&#035;xa;color:windowtext">When time is eliminated as a cause for these leng
th shrinkage
and time dilation effects, the only thing left to exlain what is haening is
the increased velocity of matter itself as it moves through sace.
Consequently, there must be an intrinsic relationshi between matter, sace,
and velocity whose interactions create a mechanical exlanation for the results
of the Michelson Morley exeriment.</san></>
< style="background:white" class="f12"><a href="htt://www.mslinks.com/MDFodHR
wOi8vd3d3LnRoZXZvcnRleHRoZW9yeS5jb20=" target="_blank"><font size="undefined" st
yle="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial">htt://www.thevortextheory.com</font></
a></>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">Well Duh. The
intrinsic relationshi <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">IS </i>time!</san>
</div>
<div style="background:white"><san style="font-family:Arial">But enough oif
this. Just try to remember all of these things and sto cussing me out for
giving you a migraine. On to the magical ingredient, Exotic Matter. But first,
a side argument between myself and Tony Bermanseder</san></div>
< class="MsoNormal">David – “What would haen if exotic matter mixed with our
own matter?”</>
< class="MsoNormal">..€..</>
< class="MsoNormal">Tony – “You will have to define exotic matter in terms of
the standard model , David.<br />
As you know, I do not envisage the resence of antimatter as necessary to model
the cosmogenesis.<br />
<br />
Relative to my understanding, the X-AntiX GUT bosonic string did NOT bifurcate
into a X-Boson of matter and an Anti-X Boson for antimatter receding the
baryogenesis.<br />
€<br />
Alternatively the X-AntiX Gut Goldstone boson bifurcated directly into a
quark/baryon-leton couling to break the string/membrane suersymmetry from
the massless Goldstone state into inertial selfstates.<br />
€<br />
Therefore, the invocation of exotic matter , say reresenting a negative mass
definition in the standard model in addition to the equivalence rincile for
inertial and gravitational mass is unwarranted.<br />
€<br />
It is indicated that it is the charge of antimatter selfstates {+-E=mc^2}€which
is in mirror symmetry (say negative) and NOT the mass; as the oositely
charges attract before annihilation. If it were the masses negating each other,
then the like charges would reel (electromagnetic interaction being stronger
than the weak and gravitational interactions).<br />
€<br />
In the Casimir effect, the local negative mass effect describes a decrease
in energy say in moving the lates closer together and so indicates a
negative force .<br />
This does not require negative mass , er se, but could be interreted as
such.<br />
€<br />
I so would say, that the exotic matter is simly the dark energy as the
ZPE/VPE subjected to confinement , say the Casimir conductor lates or some
other cavity thereby isolating the ZPE/VPE and allowing Casimir Pressure to
develo.</>
< class="MsoNormal"><br />
I have invoked antimatter as a rimary art of the standard model to roose
the existence and the breaking of the rimordial gauge symmetry.<br />
€<br />
Then this ostulated matter-antimatter symmetry relates to what mass is, say in
the e1quivalence rincile related to the negative mass as a third such
equivalence .<br />
Then the negative mass relates to the ZPE in the Casimir effect of the
shielding of a sacetime region.<br />
€<br />
This negative mass then relates in some as yet undefined manner to exotic
matter .<br />
€<br />
I do NOT subscribe to arallel universes or the many worlds because all forms
of exotic matter become suerfluous should you redefine the original breaking
of the gauge symmetry not in matter-antimatter, but in ..EMR..-AntiEMR.<br />
€<br />
Your aroach should concentrate on what MASS is, before ostulating exotic
matter which by definition is related to negative mass .”</>
< class="MsoNormal">..€..</>
< class="MsoNormal">David – “The what causes the article annihilations?</>
< class="MsoNormal">..€..</>
< class="MsoNormal">For the gamma€hotons to manifest a€ZPE
transformation, say air-annihilation or neutral ion decay OR an electron
transition by Planck s Law (fusion or fission) is required.<br />
€<br />
So if you have article annihilation and not a transition, then the
matter-antimatter couling will be€engaged.<br />
€<br />
Now the imortant asect unknown by the undits is that the gauge articles of
the ZPE are COLOUR-charged (and linked to the Dirac monoole say); whilst the
massroduced hotons (caused by the acceleration of electro charges) are not.<br
/>
€<br />
So you have an incoming gamma hoton which is not color charged (it is its own
antiarticle in chiral robability€distribution) interacting with a
gluon-color-charged nucleus say.<br />
Pair-Production then TRANSFERS the color charges of the nucleus in the gauges
(gluon, virtual hoton, suressed antihoton and graviton) to the resulting
matter-antimatter air using the colorless gamma hoton as a conduit.<br />
€<br />
In your case then, the reverse quantum mechanics alies from the ZPE level
(before the electron-ositron airing materializes in the E=hf&lt;--&gt;E=mc^2
gauge hysics).<br />
€<br />
The colorless gamma hotons reresent so a direct manifestation of the ZPE
without the invocation of the matter-antimatter couling.<br />
€<br />
In articular the EMF€Gauge-Photon unifies with the Graviton in ..RGB..(+1)+..BG
R..(-2)
in longrange gauge unification with the clockwise deficit (-1)€couling to
the€strongweak unification of the shortrange gauges in the Gluon s ..RGB..(+1)
and the Antihoton s€ ..BGR..(+1).<br />
€<br />
This then allows the Dark Matter article (RMP(-1)=RestMassPhoton) to coule
the longrange gauges to the shortrange gauges in€an overall reconstitution
of the rimordial gauge symmetry.<br />
€<br />
The unification temlate is then the mesonic quark-antiquark or
matter-antimatter virtual temlate of the nuclear interaction, but does not
manifest in the materialization of matter-antimatter coulings, say a
ositron-electron airing.<br style="mso-secial-character:line-break" />
<br style="mso-secial-character:line-break" />
</>
< class="MsoNormal"><font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:
Arial">With all
due resect here, I disagree. Exotic matter is not have to be anti-matter, in
our current understanding.€ While anti-matter is certainly exotic, not all
exotic matter is anti-matter. I would like to go back to the day astronomers
found 90% of the universe. </font>..<font size="undefined" style="font-size:12.0
t;font-family:Arial">Aril 23<su>rd</su>, 1992</font>..<font size="undefined"
style="font-size:12.0t;font-family:Arial">. And what exactly was it that these
astronomers discovered? A new kind of matter. For many years, hysicists susect
ed
that the universe must have a different kind of matter. Ordinary matter, like el
ectrons,
rotons, neutrons, and everything we see on lanet Earth is made u of ordinary
matter. Ordinary matter strongly interacts with radiation, so it s rather easy
for astronomers to detect it. </font></>
< class="MsoNormal">&lt;font size=&quot;undefined&quot; style=&quot;font-size:1
2.0&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;</></></div>
<!--- blogger s
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href= htt://blogs.m

ys ace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=539916366 >1
:44 AM</a>&nbs;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href= htt://blogs.m

ys ace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=539916366 i
d= cmtCount_539916366 >0&nbs;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href= # id= addCmt
Lnk_539916366 >Add Comment</a>)&nbs;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount2'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl02_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(539916366);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_539916366" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 539916366);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 539916366);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 539916366);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5399163
66);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 539916366);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 539916366);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 539916366);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53991636
6);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 539916366);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 539916366);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 539916366);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 539916366);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 539916366);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 539916366);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 539916366);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 539916366);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
39916366);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 539916366);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 539916366);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 539916366);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53991636
6);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 539916366);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 539916366);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 539916366);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 539916366
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 539916366);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 539916366);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 539916366);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53991636
6);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 539916366);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 539916366);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 539916366);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 539916366
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 539916366);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 539916366);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 539916366);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 539916366);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 539916366);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 539916366);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 539916366);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 539916366);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=539916366'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=539916366'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
October 10, 2010 - Sunday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_539797734">Origin 7 : The Shape of Things to Come</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_539797734" class="blogContent"><br /><br />In Origin 7, I will issue upda
tes about the European Planck mission to survey and examine the CMBR, as it shou
ld yield vital data about the nature and composition of our universe from the mo
ments of its first beginnings until now.<br /><br />As you may remember from Ori
gin 6, I drew a direct comparison between gravity and dark energy and stated tha
t they might be two sides of the same coin, just functioning on different scales
, but both products of a single omniversal entropic force (perhaps the single un
ifying force from which all the forces originated, with gravity/dark energy mere
ly being its shadow effect projected into our universe) that keeps the balance w
ithin the omniverse intact in terms of matter/energy distribution.<br /><br />I
also indicated that our universe has a geometric shape similar to a mobius strip
-- this originates from the idea that it was hatched inside a rotating black hol
e and the rotation of the black hole torques space-time, creating a ring "singul
arity" and thus the shape of our universe visible as a 2D shadow upon its hologr
aphic boundary. Our mobius strip (with the help of gravity/dark energy) can be
expanded into a horn torus in 3 dimensions or a hypersphere (specifically a 4 di
mensional glome) in 4 dimensions and on the larger scales that is what our unive
rse should look like, with light being able to take at least two paths from the
same source to reach us. The center of this geometric shape actually correspond
s to a white hole in which dark matter and dark energy, upon entering the black
hole inside our parent universe, exit into our universe, thus causing space-time
to expand and resulting in the expanding universe we perceive. Once a sufficie
nt entropic balance is achieved between the parent universe and our own, the ent
ropic force will reverse itself and gravity will cause the universe to collapse
back in on itself and restart the cycle. It will restart because gravity become
s a repulsive force at smaller than 10 planck lengths, which would be when the u
niverse's external boundary approaches the central white hole, which "bounces" i
t back. Even though at this time there doesnt seem to be enough matter in the u
niverse to generate enough gravitation for this to occur, it will happen when en
ough matter has passed through the parent white hole (the amount of dark energy
passing through will lessen as the entropy of the parent universe increases, thu
s the balance of dark matter and dark energy will favor the former over the latt
er.) This will be in the form of dark matter, whose concentrations will rise as
the eons pass by. The only reason this hasnt happened already is because of th
e existence of dark flow-- which is a gravitational leak from an adjacent megave
rse (a collection of parallel universes with different laws of physics superimpo
sed upon each other, much like ours is)-- which pulls the edges of our megaverse
further apart (and perhaps leaks matter from our megaverse into theirs-- much l
ike whats going on with ours.) Because this adjacent megaverse is leaking gravi
ty into ours it MUST be in a state of contraction (a phase which ultimately resu
lts in gravitational collapse) and once the superimposed states of the different
parallel universes in this megaverse have collapsed into each other, with the c
ausal boundaries between each of them dissolving due to the intense gravity it w
ill re big bang (a process we will go through billions of years later.) When th
is happens, the dark flow effect will disappear because the new megaverse that e
merges will be expanding and separating into a new set of superimposed parallel
universes and this explosive expansion will cause a cosmic shockwave which will
cause our megaverse to begin the contraction process. The addition of dark matt
er streaming through from our parent universe will accelerate that process with
time and the higher concentration of gravity will eventually lead to the same th
ing that happened to our neighbor megaverse. Thus we will balance each other ou
t and create a feedback loop that cycles both of our megaverses from big bang to
big bang. Even when our parent universe expands so much that the wormhole conn
ection between it and ours breaks down (black hole "evaporation") and then it co
ntracts to cyclically bang again, there will be other newly formed connections f
rom other universes to take its place (preserving our toroidal shape) and thus t
he process shall continue.<br /><br />The omniverse itself should have the struc
ture of a spindle torus, but expanded outward to 11 dimensions to include the gr
avity brane (the "dip at the center" which leaks out into all the resident unive
rses-- 10D curving into the 11th dimension) as well as hyperspace and imaginary
time and the 4+4 dimensions and their complements. Let the two component circle
s of the torus represent hyperspace and imaginary time. The intersection point
of the torus represents the part all of its resident universes hold in common--
gravity and ZPE-- and the cosmic distribution points of black holes, white holes
and their wormhole bridges. The spindle torus structure is mimicked in the int
ernal tree like structure of the omniverse in terms of its megaverses, their sat
ellite quadverses and their component universes.<br /><br />I also mentioned the
existence of something I call "ALL TIME." This is how I envision parallel time
verses all being part of the same universe, just bounded by a luxon wall that se
parates all the parallel timeverses by light barriers (with wormholes offering c
onduits into every past and every future and explaining the nonlocality of quant
um effects.) As a matter of fact, if our brains could perceive higher dimension
s we would see that time-- the so-called 4th dimension-- merely represents our b
rain's incomplete attempt to perceive a fourth spatial dimension. Because our f
ive senses arent capable of this, we perceive something we call "time" instead.
Instead of categorizing spatial and temporal dimensions separately we should co
nsider them together and the existence of time indicates to us the presence of a
fourth spatial dimension that we cannot directly sense except in the way it cau
ses changes in the other three dimensions. If we could directly sense this four
th dimension, we would notice that, just like with the spatial dimensions, there
is no real change-- but that all the past, present and futures all exist at eve
ry moment (because we cant directly sense the fourth dimension we only perceive
single snapshots of "time.") This is what people who experience things like dej
a vu, "past lives" and even "future lives" or precognition might really be detec
ting-- the true nature of time as the fourth spatial dimension. Hyperspace and
Imaginary Time, the two parent dimensions, are probably just two sides of the sa
me coin and their apparent separation into other dimensions that caused universe
s to bubble up from the bulk was the result of random fluctuations in the ZPE ca
used up gravity/dark energy that created all the other dimensions much the same
way pair production occurs and creates matter out of energy. The same process a
pplies to universe/antiverse creation (see below concerning this in 4+4 compleme
ntary dimensions.) Evidence of parallel universes and an adjacent megaverse sho
uld be apparent in high resolution CMBR data like what the Planck Satellite can
provide, as CMBR should present us with a tapestry of the universe both before a
nd after it branched off into parallel timeverses. These timeverses should be i
ndicated by repetitive shadows and highlights in the CMBR data that, like a fun
house mirror, are distorted reflections that are of a slightly different energy
level from each other. Evidence of an adjacent megaverse should be apparent as
its gravitational leak will cause the whole background tapestry to redshift more
than expected.<br /><br />Recent research suggests that consciousness exists in
8 dimensions (while the body only exists in the 3+1) and if this is true, it me
ans that consciousness-- or at least some form of conscious energy-- actually su
rvives death because it is timeless. The physical corporeal part of us is a mer
e bookmark in this larger reality in which we are connected by this conscious en
ergy into a collective consciousness that spans the universe and beyond (includi
ng animate and nonanimate matter and energy-- further explained in Origin 4.) T
hus we can be exposed to and influenced by outside conscious energy that can cre
ate a full spectrum of emotions as well as physical effects upon us. I propose t
hat these 8 dimensions are the result of pair production that resulted when our
dimensions were first created from hyperspace and imaginary time and the other 4
dimensions are complementary to the 4 dimensions we already know. I also conje
cture that the body can only exist in 4 dimensions at one time but when it expir
es it fluctuates back and forth in different forms between the 4 dimensions it o
riginally resided in and crossing a luxon barrier ("going into the light") into
the 4 complementary dimensions that were produced during pair production. (This
is further explained in Origin 1 and 2.) The consciousness, which is timeless,
remains in all 8 at the same time and retains some vestigial memories of the pre
vious fluctuations and even the ones to follow. Our minds normally bury most of
this so we dont clutter our memories. Actually, the fact that consciousness ex
ists in 8 dimensions instead of just 4 indicates yet another higher order dualis
tic symmetry-- the conscious mind typically operates in the conventional 4 dimen
sions, while the subconscious also has access to the additional 4 complementary
dimensions. Since the toroidal nature of our universe allows for the existence
of an antiverse on the "inside", upon death, not only do our bodies flip over to
this antiverse (or the mirrorverse, which might be more likely, since it experi
ences time like we do, while another set of flipping might occur between the ant
iverse and the antimirrorverse), but our conscious and subconscious also flip an
d trade places when they cross over! On the level of the torus, having the anti
verse on the inside conserves many conservation laws, including those of charge,
parity and spin. Being made of mirror matter in the same quantities as ours is
made of matter conserves charge and parity and spin are conserved in the sense
that being the mirrorverse to our own, if ours spins counterclockwise, it spins
clockwise and vice versa. In the case of parity, flipping the spatial coordinat
es is conserved because of the existence of the mirrorverse. The existence of m
irror matter and the mirrorverse resolves the parity violations observed with th
e weak interaction, as the violations occur exactly opposite to this in the mirr
orverse. Each universe should have its own mirrorverse and vice versa on its "f
lip side" created as an analog to pair production. As a matter of fact, going b
ack to the 2D scale structure of the universe on the scale of quantum interactio
ns, we have a way of resolving the four color problem (that no more than four co
lors are required to color the regions on a map so that no two adjacent regions
have the same color) on the omniversal scale by splitting each protoverse into 4
universes-- matter, antimatter, mirror matter and antimirror matter, all separa
ted by the luxon wall and interconnected by wormholes! These would all be quant
umly entangled (via the worm holes) much like 4 qubit quantum entanglement in a
quantum computer (which is another way of looking at our universe and, indeed, t
he megaverse and omniverse also!) Another indication of this structure is how a
toroidal surface can be separated into 4 circles (two in the regular fashion an
d two when turned inside out.) As a matter of fact, while the omniverse is a sp
indle torus, our quadverse would be a horn torus, with the intersection point re
presenting the point of origin of the cyclic big bang (the ultimate white hole!)
, which is reached in alternating fashion by the universe and its mirror complem
ent, and then by the antiverse and its mirror complement. If our universe were
to be considered "on top" of the torus, the mirrorverse would be "on the bottom"
while the two antiverses would be on the "inside"-- with our antiverse on the "
top inside" and the mirror antiverse on the "bottom inside." But since our uni
verse is expanding, we have to be considered on the inside (the ones on the outs
ide contain central black holes not white holes).... so if ours was on the top i
nside, the mirrorverse would be on the bottom inside, with the antiverse on the
top and the antimirrorverse on the bottom of the torus. Two of these would alwa
ys be contracting while the other two were expanding and time would run opposite
in them (anti vs "normal" matter, with the "anti" containing complementary time
, thus going through cycles opposite to ours and the mirrorverse... as a matter
of fact, because the antiverse and the antimirrorverse contain dimensions comple
mentary to those of our own universe and our mirrorverse, they arent affected by
the adjacent megaverse in the same way in terms of expansion and contraction--
that is to say, they are only affected by the corresponding antiverses and the a
ntimirrorverses in the quadverses of the adjacent megaverse, while our universe
and our mirrorverse is only affected by the corresponding universes and mirrorve
rses in the adjacent megaverse in terms of completing the feedback loop of alter
nating expansion and contraction-- symmetry on the omniverse level!) and the spe
ed of light limit would appear to be violated in the two which appeared to be go
ing backward in time (thus solving the arrow of time problem)-- of course, to th
em, it would seem like we were doing it!-- thus creating a causal holographic bo
undary on the luxon wall (light and gravity are two things we would all have in
common.) The verses in the contracting phase would actually see their central w
hite holes converted into black holes because of the massive increase in density
, which would fuel the collapse, but would reach the logical limit at 10 planck
lengths (as ring "singularities"), at which time they would re bang and become w
hite holes again. Rotational symmetry is preserved at every big bang, because o
ur universe and its mirrorverse would have opposite spins, while the antiverse a
nd mirrorverse also spin in opposite directions to each other, this maintaining
rotational symmetry at their end of the cycle also. But because everything is o
riented the opposite between the universe and its mirrorverse and the antiverse
and its mirrorverse, from within the particular verse it would seem exactly the
same as its mirror counterpart! Reducing the number of dimensions holographical
ly of this structure on the quantum level doesnt pose a problem for us, as going
from 4D to 2D allows for 4 universes that each consist of 2D (4*2D=8D) or 4 mob
ian strips on the hyperspatial-imaginary time 2D holographic boundary (think fou
r symmetrical shadowverses!)-- which would seem like a single particle (superimp
osed) for those on the "outside" (in 2D hyperspace-imaginary time, the dimension
s of wormholes), with time and complementary time both reduced to spatial dimens
ions (which explains nonlocality and action at a distance)-- thus the combo of o
ur conscious and subconscious energy would be a part of the cosmic quantum compu
ter itself, as it spans the whole network-- just like the whole collective does,
animate and inanimate! Direct proof of this might be obtained when mirror matt
er is observed as well as the existence of the symmetric shadows in the CMBR dat
a. Mirror matter might make up part of the dark matter of our universe (as it c
an enter our universe through worm holes and help create similar structures in e
ach universe) and our matter would be mirror matter in the mirrorverse. The onl
y mirror matter that is the same as ordinary matter is the graviton-- thus its c
andidacy as dark matter. Since the amount of mirror matter in the quadverse sho
uld equal the amount of normal matter, I propose that the mirrorverse contains e
xactly the same amount of mirror matter that ours contains matter and, likewise,
the antimirrorverse contains the same amount of antimirror matter as the antive
rse contains antimatter. Not only that, but the amount of dark matter and dark
energy should be the same in our universe and its mirror partner, and the antive
rse and its mirror partner-- hence why the contraction and expansion cycles are
so well timed out. And the connections dont stop there! Likewise, we can view
the quadverse to be linked to our parent quadverse through two black hole linkag
es (think DNA double helix, which is a nanoscopic version of this, sort of like
our brain is a nanoscopic version of the CMBR, the universe's "memories"-- heck,
DNA might be this connection on another level!), with the black hole our univer
se resides inside connected to another black hole in the mirrorverse of our pare
nt quadverse-- view this as one strand of DNA. The other strand consists of a b
lack hole in the antiverse version of our parent universe connected to a black h
ole in the antimirrorverse of our parent quadverse. When viewed this way, we re
alize that the reason that matter coming through the central white hole is dark
matter is because the part of the parent quadverse we are connected to is a mirr
orverse to our own universe and the part of the parent quadverse our mirrorverse
is connected to consists of "normal" matter! This is symmetry on a whole new l
evel and is the reason why both verses get dark matter-- our mirrorverse's dark
matter would be "normal" matter for us and vice verse. The same holds true for
the antiverse and the antimirrorverse, which get the mirror version of their mat
ter (our antimatter) because of the way the black holes are connected in our par
ent quadverse! These two opposing linkages are the reason why they big bang in
cycles alternating with our own and why time seems to flow backwards in the anti
versions of our quadverse. The reason why all this happens is because black hol
es bend space-time so much they actually fracture the boundaries of the quadvers
e as they unite all 8 dimensions of it with the 2 original dimensions of hypersp
ace and imaginary time. And yet, symmetry, a fundamental property of the omnive
rse, still remains. So black holes mark not only a unification of forces, but o
f dimensions as well, as they create worm holes that tunnel through the whole st
ructure and into our own universe! Any baby quadverses inside our own quadverse
would be connected in a similar way to our own. The parallel timeverses discus
sed earlier would also all exist in quads.<br /><br />Our memories from the prev
ious existence become part of the subconscious in the 4 complementary dimensions
to that antiverse or mirrorverse. A baby's birth is like a big bang with laten
t memories. The accumulation of these latent memories is what being an "old sou
l" is all about. What we call ghosts or apparitions may just be the holographic
memories or residual effects left over from before or during the cross over or
they could be actual conscious energy that got trapped in the luxon wall during
the memory transferrance from conscious energy to subconscious energy. The grow
ing body of evidence that I include below indicates this, as well as the fractal
nature of the brain, which actually mimics the CMBR data, lending more evidence
to the idea that we are but a reflection of the universe itself on a much small
er scale. Im thinking that's why we see structures repeating on various differ
ent scales-- well, basically, reality itself is composed of the same fundamental
structures and the way these structures interact with each other results in eme
rgent fractal properties and its the result of these reactions that we see all a
round us. Entanglement causes the history of the universe to be recorded onto t
he CMBR and a reflection of our own personal histories to be recorded within the
memories of our mind (both conscious and subconscious) using the same basic str
uctural properties and principles. In Origin 4, when Im talking about informati
onal wormhole tunneling from our mind to the outside environment and vice versa,
Im referring to entanglement.... the wormholes are the "pipes" the information
is the "water" that passes through them and the entanglement is the driving forc
e (call it "water pressure") which makes the whole process possible. There is p
robably some internal tunneling as well, between the 4 dimensions of the conscio
us mind and the higher 4 dimensions of the subconscious. This is what causes in
tuition, instincts and when tunneling into the universe itself, creativity (beca
use the universe is based on creativity) and curiosity (which lies at the founda
tion), including the search for the origins of it all, a fundamental reason why
the universe created us, to figure itself out! When tunneling into the collecti
ve, we get ESP, the conscious version of quantum nonlocality action at a distanc
e. The subconscious mind is what connects us to the collective consciousness or
the cosmic web (both of consciousness and of the backbone structure of the omni
verse via ZPE and its reflections in the CMBR.) The cosmic web is the backbone
of the omniverse and its structure is fractally reflected in everything around u
s-- from CMBR to EEG brain wave patterns and everything in between. The cosmic
web was created by the commutative properties of wormholes in being able to redi
stribute matter and energy on all levels, from the quantum foam of space-time an
d the micro worm holes of our own conscious and subconscious energy (as a matter
of fact, what if subconscious energy consists of mirror energy?!) to the superm
assive black holes that generate new universes!<br /><br />Some sources:<br /><b
r />John Gardiner, Robyn Overall, Jan Marc, 2010. The fractal nature of the brai
n: EEG data suggests that the brain functions as a "quantum computer" in 5-8 dim
ensions. NeuroQuantology 8(2):137-141. ABSTRACT. The brain has been traditionall
y viewed as a deterministic machine where certain inputs give rise to certain ou
tputs. However, there is a growing body of work that suggests this is not the ca
se. The high importance of initial inputs suggests that the brain may be working
in the realms of chaos, with small changes in initial inputs leading to the pro
duction of strange attractors. This may also be reflected in the physical struct
ure of the brain which may also be fractal. EEG data is a good place to look for
the underlying patterns of chaos in the brain, since it samples many millions o
f neurons simultaneously. Several studies have arrived at a fractal dimension of
between 5 and 8 for human EEG data. This suggests that the brain operates in a
higher dimension than the 4 of traditional space-time. These extra dimensions su
ggest that quantum gravity may play a role in generating consciousness.<br /><br
/><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBoeXNvcmcuY29tL25ld3MxNzQ5
MjE2MTIuaHRtbA==" target="_blank">http://www.physorg.com/news174921612.html</a><
br /><br /><br /><br />(<a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vUGh5c09yZy5
jb20=" target="_blank">PhysOrg.com</a>) -- Over the past few decades, the idea t
hat our universe could be one of many alternate universes within a giant multive
rse has grown from a sci-fi fantasy into a legitimate theoretical possibility. S
everal theories of physics and astronomy have hypothesized the existence of a mu
ltiverse made of many parallel universes. One obvious question that arises, then
, is exactly how many of these parallel universes might there be. <br /><br /><b
r /><br /><br />In a new study, Stanford physicists Andrei Linde and Vitaly Vanc
hurin have calculated the number of all possible universes, coming up with an an
swer of 10^10^16. If that number sounds large, the scientists explain that it wo
uld have been even more humongous, except that we observers are limited in our a
bility to distinguish more universes; otherwise, there could be as many as 10^10
^10^7 universes.<br /><br />To work these numbers out, Linde and Vanchurin looke
d back to the time shortly after the Big Bang, which they view as a quantum proc
ess that generated lots of quantum fluctuations. Then during the period of infla
tion, the universe grew rapidly and these quantum fluctuations were "frozen" int
o classical perturbations in distinct regions. Today, each of these regions coul
d be a different universe, having its own distinct laws of low energy physics.<b
r /><br />By analyzing the mechanism (called "slow roll inflation") that initial
ly generated the quantum fluctuations, the scientists could estimate the number
of resulting universes at 10^10^10^7 (a number which is dependent on the model t
hey used). However, this number is limited by other factors, specifically by the
limits of the human brain. Since the total amount of information that one indiv
idual can absorb in a lifetime is about 10^16 bits, which is equivalent to 10^10
^16 configurations, this means that a human brain couldn't distinguish more than
10^10^16 universes.<br /><br />Requiring that the human brain must be able to c
ount the number of parallel universes may seem inappropriate, if not arrogant, b
ut Linde and Vanchurin explain that dealing with the quantum world is different
than our everyday lives in which quantum effects can be safely ignored. A crucia
l part of their calculation here is an investigation of quantum effects on super
galactic scales. In this kind of scenario, the state of the multiverse and obser
vations made by an observer are correlated (similar to the Schrodinger cat exper
iment, where the outcome can be determined only after it is registered by a clas
sical observer). <br /><br />"When we analyze the probability of the existence o
f a universe of a given type, we should be talking about a consistent pair: the
universe and an observer who makes the rest of the universe 'alive' and the wave
function of the rest of the universe time-dependent," the scientists write. <br
/><br />As the scientists explain, the calculation of the number of universes i
s an important step toward an even larger goal: to find the probability of livin
g in a universe with a particular set of properties. What are the chances that w
e live in a world in which the laws of physics are these laws that we currently
observe? Answering this question requires finding probabilities that depend on k
nowing about other universes, among many other challenges.<br /><br /></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=539797734'>1
1:03 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=539797734' i
d='cmtCount_539797734'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_539797734'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount3'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl03_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(539797734);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_539797734" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 539797734);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 539797734);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 539797734);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5397977
34);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 539797734);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 539797734);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 539797734);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53979773
4);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 539797734);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 539797734);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 539797734);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 539797734);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 539797734);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 539797734);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 539797734);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 539797734);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
39797734);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 539797734);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 539797734);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 539797734);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53979773
4);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 539797734);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 539797734);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 539797734);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 539797734
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 539797734);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 539797734);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 539797734);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53979773
4);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 539797734);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 539797734);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 539797734);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 539797734
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 539797734);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 539797734);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 539797734);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 539797734);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 539797734);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 539797734);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 539797734);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 539797734);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=539797734'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=539797734'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
September 4, 2010 - Saturday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_538841713">Origin 6: Unification!</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_538841713" class="blogContent"><br />Im starting work on Origin Part 6: U
nification, where I bring forth the idea that unification of forces naturally oc
curs in nature. There is some evidence of this (“electroweak stars” — unification of t
he electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force inside neutron stars) but Im bri
nging forth the idea that ALL the forces are unified inside black holes, and thi
s unification is what creates the black hole in the first place– not gravitational
collapse. Going forth with the idea that “Things are more than they seem” theme, Im
going to use that to create a model whereby black holes are presented as the fa
bric of space-time being “inside out” or reversed, much like quantum loop cosmology
predicts is what happened during the big bang. You can see where this is leading
to– that black holes contain bubble universes (like ours) that exist in a sea of
exotic matter where all the forces are unified.<br /><br />There is a hierarchic
al fractal order to the universe on many different levels and and I believe that
what we call “natural law” is simply an intrinsic property of the universe– like a ba
sic property of a subatomic particle (charge, spin, etc.) The universe was just
a particle at some point and I believe the properties from its infancy have been
retained and express themselves in varied ways in the reality we see around us.
<br /><br />Similarly, particle universes with different properties would result
in universes with different “natural laws.”<br /><br />Actually, you can consider l
ife itself a fundamental property of the universe. Did you know that quantum lin
kages have been found to exist inside biological systems, including DNA? It make
s me think that life is– literally– universal.<br />This is another example of hiera
rchical fractal layers: Think of a sea of exotic matter with small bubbles with
spontaneously decreasing entropy that BANG…. these would be bubble universes, like
the one from which our universe was born. So life would also be like this– sponta
neous areas of order that pop up and slowly wind down (like what our universe it
self is doing.) This natural law / property of the bubble universe exists from t
he quantum level all the way up to the largest structures — including life itself.
It’s as i  we have been branded by the particular universe we exist in by the ver
y nature o  its ormation.<br /><br />What about the idea o  a universe created
within another universe by an advanced alien civilization? This idea has been pr
oposed by some physicists and cosmologists and o  course then we have the proble
m o  where those aliens came rom. In an in inite but sel -limited ractal omniv
erse hierarchy which exists both inside and outside o  space-time, o  course, yo
u can create a loop whereby cause and e ect become one and the same and the cre
ation becomes the creator– thereby solving that problem.<br /><br />Regarding supe
rsymmetry: Are sparticles really separate higher dimensional versions o  “conventi
onal” particles or could it be that “conventional” particles are actually the part o 
sparticles that we can actually see, because we cant detect the whole particle w
ith our limited perspective…. sort o  like the particles’ “soul?” I envision conventio
nal particles as the part we can see through our “peephole” (like when Saturn s rin
gs are seen edge on through a telescope) while the sparticle itsel  represents t
he ull extent o  the same particle. In this case, a conventional particle would
merely be a shadow o  a sparticle. Perhaps we will be able to see them with t
he LHC– which could open up a whole new avenue into research o  that which we cant
detect with the conventional senses or at lower energies…. getting us closer to a
more undamental and wideranging view o  reality…. both rom the reductionist and
the wholistic point o  view!<br /><br /> There is no initial cosmological singu
larity. The singularity you speak o  originates rom the ailing o  relativity
to explain the initial boundary conditions o  our universe. Once we ind a way
to uni y quantum mechanics and relativity the singularity problem will disappear
-- not only rom the beginning o  the universe, but also rom what we call "bla
ck holes." As a matter o  act, physics right now is leaning towards the idea t
hat black holes are the birth places o  other universes just like ours did insid
e a relatively larger universe.<br /><br /><br />And something did exist be ore
the space-time dimensions which we perceive, because our universe originated as
a quantum particle inside a cosmic soup o  particles, the existence and destruct
ion o  which depends on the extant physical laws and constants present inside ea
ch universe. Consider it the quantum version o  the laws o  evolution and natur
al selection. Hawkings terms or the original time dimension that existed be o
re the big bang is called "Imaginary Time." Consider imaginary time to be a dim
ension o  time that runs perpendicular to the one o  which we are aware. Sort o
 like the Y-axis o  time compared to the X-axis o  our time. When this is take
n into account, the singularity at the big bang disappears. (It also allows us
to graphically represent parallel timeverses, but that s beyond the scope o  thi
s post-- see Origin 1 and 2 or more details.) A competing model, called quantu
m loop cosmology also resolves the singularity by stating that at extremely smal
l volumes, the density ormula (D=M/V) ails and there ore there is no singulari
ty. As a matter o  act, at diameters below 10 planck lengths, density actually
goes down, even i  you pack more mass into a given volume -- thus the idea o  b
aby universes inside black holes. When thinking about this, I thought it reason
able to assume that one o  the reasons that black holes present themselves as si
ngularities is because all the orces are uni ied just inside their boundaries.
This makes sense when you think about it, because we already have electroweak s
tars which uni y the electromagnetic and weak nuclear orces and presenting blac
k holes as the inal result o  compact orce uni ication rather than simple grav
itational collapse is also a graphic way to explain what happens when the matter
inside is crushed to a pulp and converted into exotic matter that no longer ol
lows the laws o  our universe. Also, orce uni ication inside black holes would
satis y the initial boundary conditions that led to the ormation o  our own un
iverse and should thus also be a prerequisite to the creation o  other universes
and the breakdown o  relativity on that scale-- because it doesnt allow or uni
ication (something which Einstein spent the rest o  his li e in a utile pursui
t o  attempting to achieve -- along with a similarly utile pursuit o  trying to
disprove quantum mechanics. Veri ication o  this should be possible at the LH
C when it is up and running at ull capacity-- as a matter o  act, physicists h
ave toyed with the idea o  creating designer baby universes (most notably Andrei
Linde) that would expand into their own dimensions and curve into themselves.
This is where the idea o  a universe being designed by an intelligent being with
physical laws and constants o  his/her/its/their choosing (as their signature)
originated rom. What most people dont know is that Einstein was actually worki
ng on a theory o  multiple dimensions very similar to string theory just prior t
o his death.) According to QLC, instead o  a singularity, the universe doesnt b
ang at all, instead it goes "inside out" at each point o  apparent origin and th
us is both in inite and sel -limited. Like a Mobius strip. Dimensions are in l
oops. Travel ar enough in one direction and you end up back at your starting p
oint. The unny thing is that relativity already allows or this close to the
outer boundaries o  black holes in the orm o  closed timelike curves (CTCs), wh
ich is time looping back in on itsel . As the universe expands, the size o  the
loops would expand also. As a matter o  act, the whole universe would be one
large loop that goes back to the beginning each time. The loops would have brid
ges or tunnels between them (seen rom the "sur ace" o  the strip as black holes
or worm holes) inside which the orces are uni ied and where baby universes are
ormed which exchange matter and energy with the parent universe. With time, a
s the universe expands, the bridges would distend and eventually the baby univer
se would be cut o  rom its parent, much like a biological baby gets cut o  r
om the mother s placenta, even as new connections were ormed, both between the
parent and new baby universes, and also between the babies and the baby universe
s would give birth to their own. Since the ractal hierarchy is preserved, this
looplike structure would also exist on the omniverse level, where the universes
o  each megaverse would be connected like spokes on a wheel, with new connectio
ns being developed even as old ones are broken, and the ree low o  matter and
energy keeping everything in balance. The question o  the beginning o  the omni
verse would have no real answer as the cosmic loop with connecting bridges ensur
es that all moments in time exist simultaneously so there is no beginning or end
-- just like with our own universe! Causality doesnt exist on this undamental
level-- just like it doesnt exist at the quantum level-- and neither does the sp
eed o  light limit, which is more o  a natural boundary condition meant to separ
ate the universes (but which can be gated with wormholes to keep the whole syste
m in balance-- gravity being the agent o  entropy which keeps everything lowing
and keeps the omniverse in dynamic equilibrium.)<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />A
s ar as space and time giving way to something more basic at the big bang and p
rior, this is also used as a way to explain quantum mechanics nonlocality proper
ties like superposition (two particles being in exactly the same place at the sa
me time), teleportation, tunneling, entanglement etc. Since the universe was on
ce a quantum particle, it once behaved according to the same rules (and might st
ill, depending on perspective.) On the quantum scale, space and time dont exist
as we see them on the macroscopic scale, they give way to more undamental nonl
ocal properties which make the quantum e ects ("spooky action at a distance") p
ossible.<br /><br />I like many o  Penrose s ideas as well (speci ically quantum
theories o  consciousness-- but even that has given way to a more likely David
Bohm interpretation.) See Origin 4: Consciousness or more details.<br /><br />
<br />BTW, in the above post, I havent even mentioned the most ascinating aspec
t o  cosmology-- the act that the holographic principle seems to hold true -- t
hat our universe can actually be described in D-1 dimensions (D= the 3 spatial d
imensions in our case) and the act that the holographic principle can be used t
o test the multiple universe theory, which should exist as ( or lack o  a better
term) shadows in the background o  the cosmic background radiation (CMB) which
contains the holographic in ormation o  our universe-- just like our universe s
black holes (other universes) contain all their in ormation at the holographic b
oundary (another sign o  ractalization.) Such testing is already underway.<br
/><br />Being holographic in ormation on the sur ace o  a black hole / quantum p
article means the third spatial dimension is merely an illusory e ect created b
y gravity as it curves space-time into a loop (a megaverse sized CTC) by acting
on the original dimensions o  hyperspace and imaginary time. And the reason why
photons o  light dont experience the passage o  time as they travel at light sp
eed is because they exist on the luxon wall-- the event horizon o  the black hol
e, the outer boundary o  space-time itsel , where it meets hyperspace and imagin
ary time! <br /><br />Gravity is the entropic orce that keeps the omniverse in
balance by redistributing matter and energy via di erent sized black hole / wo
rm hole tunnels-- dark energy or quintessence being the result-- as one megavers
e expands another contracts and the balance is preserved. <br /><br />The megav
erse includes all the parallel timeverses o  a given universe, each with the sam
e physical laws and constants. All the megaverses o  di erent laws and constan
ts make up the omniverse. But the component universes/timeverses o  each megave
rse all have the same physical laws and constants and there ore expand and contr
act together. The di erences between them (the parallel timelines) are due to
lack o  causality at the undamental level (because all time and all outcomes ex
ist simultaneously and there is no speed o  light limit at the quantum level to
compartmentalize reality)-- the causality we see on the macroscopic scale (as we
ll as space-time and the uncertainty principle) is merely an averaging or smooth
ing out o  more elementary actors that exist at the subplanck level and inside
black holes (as well as the perception o  a single universe, which was a limitat
ion o  Relativity, which the quantum universe has eradicated)-- which is the sca
le o  the omniverse [at which all universes, megaverses, etc can be seen as quan
tum particles bubbling in a sea o  ZPE (the redistribution o  which causes some
megaverses to expand while others contract, thus preserving the cosmic balance a
nd resulting in cyclic big bangs, at which point all the parallel timeverses o 
a speci ic megaverse become one, as the event horizon separating them rom each
other and the bulk temporarily collapses, thus causing the cyclic "Big Bang" reb
ound), where the orces are all united and the original dimensions o  hyperspace
, imaginary time and gravity hold sway-- thus, the real reason why black holes c
urve space-time, cause CTCs and have such intense gravitation-- as they are tapp
ing into its source.] The reason why the uncertainty principle loses its e ect
at the quantum level is that the omniverse at that scale is purely mathematical
, thus removing the need to be "measured"-- it behaves according to simple mathe
matical constructs and ormulae, which give rise to all the structures we see ar
ound us (atoms, solar systems, star clusters, galaxies, etc) in a ractal hierar
chy. The reason the ractal hierarchy exists is that the our dimensional unive
rse we perceive is actually only two dimensional (hyperspace plus imaginary time
) on the smallest o  scales (thus the mathematics o  quantum gravity describe it
per ectly, without need or the kind o  measurement a complex 4D space-time req
uires), which in dualistic terms, places us inside a black hole inside a larger
universe with the CMB and light on the holographic boundary and gravity creating
the perception o  the other dimensions as it curves space-time into a closed lo
op. To sum up, our our dimensions (three spatial plus one temporal) reduce to
three (two dimensional plus one temporal) at the planck scale, as gravity is sho
wn to create the third spatial dimension on our scale, and in the subplanckian r
ealm, the number o  dimensions is urther reduced to 2 (hyperspace and imaginary
time) as our amiliar space-time is replaced by "no space" and "all time" and c
ausality, the speed o  light limit and the uncertainty and exclusionary principl
es disappear as their boundaries are crossed (similar to crossing a microwormhol
e embedded in quantum oam) and the quantum properties o  superposition, entangl
ement, teleportation and tunneling arise. Furthermore, since our dimensions dis
appear, gravity becomes as strong as the other orces and then they all uni y on
that scale as gravity becomes a strong repulsive orce (like dark energy) on th
at scale and creates the Big Bounce as the event horizons separating the paralle
l timeverses collapse and the universe cyclically big bangs. This is best repre
sented by quantum loop cosmology, which shows that just as gravity becomes incre
dibly intense (as D=M/V reaches its maximum) at 10 planck lengths, gravity shuts
o  and reverses and the density goes down. This represents the ingredients ne
eded to create traversable black hole worm hole conduits and what causes the big
bang in the irst place! The unny thing is, because o  the dualistic nature o
 reality, our universe/megaverse still is just a quantum particle inside a blac
k hole inside a larger universe and still obeys quantum properties like the ones
Ive mentioned above. BTW the larger universe would be a quantum particle insid
e a black hole inside another universe and so on, until we get back to our own--
an in inite and yet closed loop o  universes! More ractal duality! On the ma
croscopic scale, the complex interplay o  di erent actors and spontaneous symm
etry breaking result in the need or measurement-- and thus the uncertainty prin
ciple arises. As a matter o  act, we can view the uncertainty principle and th
e exclusionary principle both orming the boundary between relativity s smooth a
nd continuous space-time and quantum mechanics discrete planck and subplanck si
zed packets o  space-time, much as we view the duality o  light as being both a
wave (smooth and continuous) and particle (discrete.) Yet another example o  th
e duality o  ractal hierarchy! And just like wormhole tunnels can break throug
h the luxon wall, so can the wall o  the uncertainty principle and the exclusion
ary principle be broken on higher scales using the property o  superconductivity
-- which is why string theory has been shown to have applications in de ining th
e properties o  superconductive materials. Perhaps superconductivity was a und
amental property o  the particle universe. The quantum critical state (visualiz
e this as the uncertainty and exclusionary principle s version o  the luxon wall
since superconductive materials meet with no resistance, thus measurement does
not a ect outcome and two electrons can be in the same place at the same time o
r at two di erent places at the same time-- superposition!) is the tipping poin
t, beyond which electromagnetism becomes superconductive, much like 10 planck le
ngths is the tipping point beyond which gravity becomes repulsive and starts beh
aving like dark energy. I  we can achieve superconductivity at room temperature
s, this represents added hope or constructing wormhole tunnels also, as both re
present uni ications o  the nanoscopic scale o  quantum mechanics and the macros
copic scale o  relativity (and both behave according to the same laws o  electro
magnetism and gravity regarding distribution o  charge across a single dimension
, not area-- partial uni ication o  orces and dimensions right there!) This re
presents just one o  many practical applications o  something we all take or gr
anted, magnetism (quantum computing is another), in a way that can be explained
in terms o  the theory o  everything we have all been searching or, in a way th
at could bene it all o  human society in the orm o  room temperature supercondu
ctivity! The next big leap in technological advance! Perhaps the uni ication a
lready exists in the orm o  dark energy (ZPE), which could be the macroscopic v
ersion o  the same repulsive orce that gravity is on the quantum scale..... so
the same orce can both attract and repel and is scale variant, the same way the
dimensions and orces are! Yet another duality exists between quantum entangle
ment, string theory and black holes, as theyve been shown to behave according to
the same rules-- which is yet more proo  that our universe might be a quantum p
article that is entangled within itsel  inside a black hole o  a larger universe
(and that these entanglements take the orm o  black hole worm hole tunnels tha
t intraconnect the universe on many di erent scales, thus solving both the hori
zon and the latness problems-- not only within, but without also-- with paralle
l timeverses and other megaverses-- as I will illustrate below.) Thus the dual
ractal hierarchy o  the quantum particle omniverse is born!<br /><br />Black ho
les have two horizons, the outer event horizon and the inner cauchy horizon.....
one side contains closed space-like geodesics and the other side has closed tim
e like geodesics. Usually the Cauchy Horizon would be considered unstable, but
due to the boosting e ects o  ZPE and the Casimir E ect, it retains stability.
The problem is that this results in the negation o  cosmic censorship-- which
is what resulted in Hawking losing a bet back in 1997.<br /><br /><br />In 1991,
John Preskill and Kip Thorne bet against Stephen Hawking that the hypothesis wa
s alse. Hawking conceded the bet in 1997, due to the discovery o  the special s
ituations just mentioned, which he characterized as "technicalities". Hawking la
ter re ormulated the bet to exclude those technicalities. The revised bet is sti
ll open, the prize being "clothing to cover the winner s nakedness"<br /><br /><
br /><br /><br />The act that the cosmic censorship hypothesis (the idea that s
pace-time "hides" singularities so they cant be seen by the outside observer) ha
s been proven invalid in some circumstances is why its possible that causality c
an be broken on the most undamental level. The act that the cauchy horizon ca
n be stable inside black holes with the help o  ZPE (aka matter/energy created o
ut o  nothing) has caused some physicists to theorize that the "second" horizon
might orm the outer boundary o  a universe that exists inside the black hole (t
he ZPE inside would have the e ect o  causing the universe to bang cyclically a
nd the cauchy horizon would make it curve into itsel ), because the horizon woul
d have the e ect o  bending (or lensing) space-time around it and separating th
e dimensions that exist outside rom the ones that exist within. To give an exa
mple, let s say we were talking about a black hole in our own universe, you d ha
ve the normal 3+1 dimensions on the outside, the 2+1 dimensions o  the holograph
ic principle on the event horizon, but the basic 1+1 dimension (hyperspace plus
imaginary time) between the event horizon and the cauchy horizon, and the dimens
ions o  the "innerverse" inside the Cauchy Horizon. The really ironic thing is,
it is the gravity inside the black hole which causes not only the cyclic big ban
gs but also the development o  extra dimensions! I  we make that allowance (1+1
dimensions inside a black hole), gravity becomes renormalizable and easily uni 
ied with the other orces (via quantum gravity).... which is perhaps why the cha
rge o  a black hole can be described by a single spatial dimension rather than b
y area. And while gravity and spin o  the black hole might determine the nature
o  the dimensions o  the innerverse, the electromagnetic charge might determine
whether or not the innerverse is composed o  matter or antimatter. Another rea
son why the black hole s charge can be described by a single dimension (and the
reason why relativity and quantum mechanics both have problems describing black
holes and why the orces should be uni ied inside) is that the black hole is bas
ically a macroscopic quantum particle -- that is, it behaves like a quantum part
icle but in the macroscopic verse o  relativity -- there ore you need the uni ic
ation o  BOTH to understand it. And this is also why the uncertainty and exclus
ionary principles wont hold inside the event horizon. As a matter o  act, a ma
croscopic quantum particle like a black hole would be the per ect analogy to roo
m temperature superconductors-- because both are rom the quantum world, but exi
st in the macroscopic world o  relativity and can be described using some o  the
same principles via string theory s gauge gravity duality, awaiting a inal the
ory o  everything to be ully understood. This is just another example o  the 
ractal nature o  our omniverse! <br /><br />The region beyond the Cauchy horizo
n has several surprising eatures. The r coordinate again behaves like a spatial
coordinate and can vary reely. The interior region has a re lection symmetry,
so that a ( uture-directed time-like) curve may continue along a symmetric path,
which continues through a second Cauchy horizon, through a second event horizon
, and out into a new exterior region which is isometric to the original exterior
region o  the Kerr solution. The curve could then escape to in inity in the new
region or enter the uture event horizon o  the new exterior region and repeat
the process. This second exterior is sometimes thought o  as another universe. O
n the other hand, in the Kerr solution, the singularity is a ring, and the curve
may pass through the center o  this ring. The region beyond permits closed, tim
e-like curves. Since the trajectory o  observers and particles in general relati
vity are described by time-like curves, it is possible or observers in this reg
ion to return to their past.<br /><br />Earlier I had mentioned parallel timever
ses. Since universes are ractal in nature and the size o  the dimensions depen
ds on the scale being used, they are subject to quantum e ects. The same way t
hat multiple universes can be quantumly entangled, I believe that parallel timev
erses (or Layer 1 multiverses) are quantumly superpositioned on top o  the paren
t protoverse. In reality, all time exists at every moment (something Newton and
Einstein also intuited) and since all time exists at every moment at a very un
damental level, causality doesnt need to exist on that level and is just a unct
ion o  the limits o  human perception not to be able to process the wholeness o 
All Time. The speed o  light compartmentalizes these parallel timeverses and w
e need Layer 1 (stellar) wormholes to tunnel through the luxon wall to travel be
tween them.... but one way to think about it is that all these parallel timevers
es are merely di erent compartments o  the same universe and only appear to be
di erent universes because the luxon wall is the barrier between them (light ex
ists on the border o  all the parallel universes, thus seamlessly traveling betw
een them, as explained by the double slit experiment and its dual nature)-- and
this makes the idea o  all time existing at every moment and polycausality (incl
uding retro and reverse causality) more clear and especially apparent at the bas
ic quantum level where locality and causality dont exist because the dimensions
o  space and time break down and Pauli s Exclusionary Principle no longer applie
s. Consider that an alien scientist who was observing our universe rom the out
side o  our parallel multiverse (as a supermassive black hole) would only see ON
E universe (i  any at all) -- because the parallel timeverses are all part o  th
e same universe, they are just superpositioned together and our speed o  light b
arrier would not be a barrier to an observer outside o  the universe and so he/s
he/it would not perceive single moments o  time like we do (o  our temporal dime
nsion, at any rate.) That observer would only see a single quantum particle, th
e quantum superposition o  all the parallel timeverses, and the combined quantum
states o  all o  them.... all the pasts, presents and utures, the whole spectr
um rather than just one small segment-- which maybe is what we see when we witne
ss quantum wave collapse (while we can observe only one energy level o  our univ
erse because the speed o  light barrier compartmentalizes it, we can only see on
e energy level o  a universe outside our parallel multiverse because we see the
sum total o  all the energy levels as one and the same would apply, in reverse,
to someone on the outside looking in) -- which shows just how ractally circular
the omniverse really is! Viewed this way, all the big bangs o  the cyclic univ
erse can be seen as one big bang that is one quantum state o  the universe and t
hat always exists, along with all the quantum states that exist in between each
"bang." Instead o  wave collapse what s really going on is that all causes and
all e ects are actually occuring simultaneously-- which is why quantum e ects
seem so weird, since macroscopic reality (or our perception o  it) is just an av
eraging out o  everything (and I mean that literally) that occurs at the quantum
level. Where ractal hierarchy comes in is when we consider the act that what
is quantum to us is macroscopic to a lower order megaverse which is nested with
in ours and what we consider macroscopic is quantum to a higher level megaverse
in which ours is nested. What causes parallel timeverse ormation? Spontaneous
symmetry breaking! While we could only see the current state o  the CMB on our
holographic boundary, on the outside they would see it completely-- past, prese
nt and uture all rolled into one at the holographic boundary. O  course this w
ould also apply i  we were viewing a universe outside o  our parallel multiverse
-- like inside a supermassive black hole or one created in a lab supercollider,
or instance. Heisenberg s Uncertainty Principle will break down at this level
(as experiments are already starting to indicate) as a more undamental structur
e (higher order quantum unction) takes over. As Ive already explained in Origi
n 1, I view single stellar black holes as portals to the di erent compartments
o  our parallel multiverse (mini black holes would connect intrauniverse), while
I eel that supermassive black holes are the gateways to outside parallel multi
verses, or other megaverses (universes with di erent physical laws, constants a
nd/or dimensions) and that micro black holes embedded within quantum oam can ex
plain the Casimir E ect, the quantum properties o  entanglement, tunneling, tel
eportation and superposition and also some o  the special e ects o  quantum con
sciousness-- including deja vu, premonition, precognition and ESP -- through mul
tidimensional micro worm hole tunneling embedded within the quantum oam o  our
consciousness. Mini black holes would connect our universe with our antiverse (
explained urther in Origin 1 and 2.) In the theory o  "all time" my view o  an
tiverses complementing every parallel timeverse remains unchanged, as does the L
aw o  Complementary Dimensions, with the universe/antiverse couplet being genera
ted thru pair production. This couplet arises in Kerr Black Holes, as they have
no charge, there ore a matter / antimatter couplet is required to balance the e
nergy equation. The black hole end contains the matter universe while the white
hole end contains the antimatter universe (re er to the earlier Origins to see
how this would work and to see the geometric arrangement o  universe/antiverse/m
irrorverse-- just adjust to re lect "all time," there ore all times and outcomes
occur simultaneously, separated rom their matter counterparts by a luxon wall.
As always gravity curves the original 1+1 dimensions in di erent ways to crea
te di erent dimensioned universes.) Yet another example o  ractal wholeness!<
br /><br />I think one o  the great tragedies in modern times is specialization– p
eople concentrating so hard in one area that they dont see how it connects to ot
her disciplines. I look up to polymaths and renaissance people, as I think they “g
ot it” as ar as being able to see the connections that underlie all o  reality. I
think it’s all a matter o  perspective– the universe exists in many many layers– we a
re on the inside in some, on the outside in others– and that results in vastly di 
erent perceptions o  how reality works. The reason we dont see the changes happ
ening when we are on the outside is because (I believe) di erent dimensional pe
rspectives– di erent dimensions o  space and time. And when we’re on the inside we
lack the wholistic, overall perspective o  what causes our environment to be the
way it is. Thus the di erences between quantum mechanics and relativity and th
e nonlocality problems we ace when changing perspectives. However, true unity w
ill mean that all dimensions are re lections o  a small basic set o  dimensions– a
nd our 3 dimensions o  space and 1 o  time wont prove to be any more undamental
than the proton and neutron are (which are made o  three quarks each.)<br /><br
/>Its just been shown that solar lares and cycles actually in luence the hal 
lives o  radioactive isotopes. It’s unny that we seek to ind the theory that uni
ies everything; perhaps uni ication already exists around us, but we just keep
missing it.<br /><br />I outlined a thought that li e is a re lection o  one o 
the basic properties o  our universe. I meant to also add that I believe conscio
usness goes part and parcel with that– because consciousness can be explained on t
he quantum level also. Everything is interlinked in a harmonious way to create t
he wondrously complex and intricate reality all around us and yet the basis or
it is marvelously simple and elegant. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey has shown tha
t our universe has a ractal hierarchy to it, and I believe that ractal nature
exists on every level– it shows how simple elegance can be arranged to create appa
rent complexity and variety when in luenced by various orces and ields.<br /><
br />Not only that, but natural selection has been proven to exist on the quantu
m level also….. and bubble theories o  the universe state that natural selection m
ay be how certain bubbles with particular sets o  physical laws and constants ex
pand while others do not.<br /><br />DNA not only orms its linkages through the
electromagnetic orce– but it’s also been shown that quantum interactions such as t
unneling and superposition create its properties also. Quantum mechanics has als
o been linked to such biochemical processes as photosynthesis and neurological p
rocesses such as how birds navigate during migration.<br /><br />I dont think yo
u can just separate and box up the di erent orces — theyre all interrelated and
unction as a whole. You can see the connections when you analyze the whole syst
em and dont separate it into “chemical” “biological” “physical” or by what orces they inte
act with “weak” “strong” “EM” “gravity”!<br /><br />We’ll never have the entire puzzle igu
, but we’ll be able to add more and more pieces so that we get a better idea o  th
e whole picture. O  course the more pieces we add, the more we’ll realize the pict
ure is larger than what we originally thought (has more layers to it)– which will
keep us rom ever solving it entirely, but will add the to un o  the whole proc
ess. A ter all, i  you igure something out completely (i  that were even possib
le) then it loses its purpose and meaning….<br /><br />I ind this really intrigui
ng and the precise values and relative strengths o  all the orces being withing
a strictly de ined range is what makes our universe what it is. Even a small de
viation would have resulted in something completely di erent– a universe in which
li e might not be possible at all. As a matter o  act, what we call constants,
might have varied rom one end o  the universe to the other and even changed wi
th time. This is why I like the bubble universe idea, because i  youre not a a
n o  ine tuning or intelligent design, the existence o  a multitude o  universe
s with their own physical laws as per Tegmark, is the way to go. This is where n
atural selection also comes in, like at the quantum level, deciding which outcom
es would result in a “big bang” universe and which would result in a “big poo ” that wou
ld be just a virtual particle disappearing back into the sea o  exotic matter.<b
r /><br />Also, uni ication o  orces that already exists in nature, such as ele
ctroweak stars or possibly, black holes, provide us keys as to what the universe
was like in its extreme in ancy, when the orces had not yet precipitated out o
 their “solution.” As a matter o  act, uni ication may be much closer than we thin
k as I recently read a research article that explains superconductivity using th
e same physics as is used to explain black holes. This might even result in the
irst *gasp* tangible victory or string theory.<br /><br />The inspiration or
Origin 6<br /><br />Nikodem Poplawski’s Cosmology with Torsion<br /><a hre ="http:
//www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vYXJ4aXYub3JnL2Ficy8xMDA3LjA1ODc=" target="_blank"
>arxiv.org/abs/1007.0587</a><br /><br />Baby Universe Creation by Black Holes co
n irmed theoretically<br />Why Our Universe Must Have Been Born Inside a Black H
ole<br /><br />Posted: 12 Jul 2010 09:10 PM PDT<br /><br />A small change to the
theory o  gravity implies that our universe inherited its arrow o  time rom th
e black hole in which it was born.<br /><br />“Accordingly, our own Universe may b
e the interior o  a black hole existing in another universe.” So concludes Nikodem
Poplawski at Indiana University in a remarkable paper about the nature o  space
and the origin o  time.<br /><br />The idea that new universes can be created i
nside black holes and that our own may have originated in this way has been the
raw odder o  science iction or many years. But a proper scienti ic derivation
o  the notion has never emerged.<br /><br />Today Poplawski provides such a der
ivation. He says the idea that black holes are the cosmic mothers o  new univers
es is a natural consequence o  a simple new assumption about the nature o  space
time.<br /><br />Poplawski points out that the standard derivation o  general re
lativity takes no account o  the intrinsic momentum o  spin hal  particles. Howe
ver there is another version o  the theory, called the Einstein-Cartan-Kibble-Sc
iama theory o  gravity, which does.<br /></div>
<!--- blogger s
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentIn o">
<div class="cmtcell"><a hre = http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.c m? useaction=blog.view& riendId=415169779&blogId=538841713 >5
:12 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a hre = http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.c m? useaction=blog.view& riendId=415169779&blogId=538841713 i
d= cmtCount_538841713 >0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a hre = # id= addCmt
Lnk_538841713 >Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount4'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl04_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(538841713);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_538841713" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 538841713);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 538841713);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 538841713);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5388417
13);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 538841713);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 538841713);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 538841713);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53884171
3);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 538841713);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 538841713);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 538841713);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 538841713);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 538841713);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 538841713);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 538841713);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 538841713);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
38841713);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 538841713);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 538841713);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 538841713);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53884171
3);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 538841713);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 538841713);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 538841713);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 538841713
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 538841713);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 538841713);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 538841713);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53884171
3);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 538841713);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 538841713);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 538841713);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 538841713
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 538841713);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 538841713);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 538841713);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 538841713);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 538841713);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 538841713);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 538841713);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 538841713);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=538841713'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=538841713'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
April 29, 2010 - Thursday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_533583686">A Cosmic Casimir Effect</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_533583686" class="blogContent"><div>This series comprises four entries….. C
onsciousness, Love, Origin 1 and Origin 2– The Quest for Proof. I will expand the
series as needed and as more research is done and evidence comes in. Im confiden
t of my position on this, as both science and spirituality seem to be on my side
as of now. Stay Tuned!<br /><br />I find that in our attempts to reduce everyth
ing to fundamental parts we lose the forest for the trees, so to type. Whether w
e’re talking about the mind-body interaction o  a single person or the whole struc
ture o  the cosmos, we’re learning that, upon closer examination, the orces at wo
rk which create the tapestry we see as reality have such abstract qualities that
reduction only reveals a single acet o  their properties– that to understand the
m more ully, we have to look at the big picture and see how everything is conne
cted to each other and how interactions can occur between particles and people t
hat are a vast distance apart. We learn that space is nonlocal and that time is
just an invention o  perception. And in so doing, not only do we learn a lot abo
ut the universe, we learn a lot about ourselves.<br /><br />Ive recently been wo
rking with a sel created model where ZPE concentrations throughout the multivers
e are determined by whether a given universe is expanding or contracting. As a u
niverse expands, it gains ZPE (“dark energy”), thus maintaining a similar ZPE densit
y, even though it is expanding (thus solving a major “unsolved” problem in physics)….
and a universe which is contracting is actually losing ZPE to the bulk because a
s a universe ages, more massive stars turn into black holes and suck ZPE out o 
the universe at a aster rate than the rate at which it is being pulled in throu
gh worm holes (as it starts to lose its dark energy, gaining entropy and “coming b
ack empty” but still maintaining a similar ZPE density since its volume is decreas
ing) which then is gained by expanding universes through a process that is analo
gous to “osmosis” through black hole worm hole conduits on various scales (but espec
ially through quantum oam as the Casimir E ect.) A ter all the dark energy is
gone, the black holes slowly evaporate, but not be ore their gravitation sets th
e universe on the path to collapse and lays the groundwork or the next big bang
cycle. Averaging out the various universes in the multiverse that are in di er
ent stages o  expansion or collapse creates a consistent cosmological constant t
hroughout the multiverse. Thus the density luctuations o  ZPE throughout the mu
ltiverse (in addition to black hole worm hole conduits) not only determine the r
ate and direction o  net ZPE trans er between di erent universes, they also det
ermine which universes expand and which contract through a mutual eedback proce
ss and maintain an overall balance in the multiverse, thus nothing is created or
destroyed and Conservation Laws are maintained.<br /><br />I will probably star
t writing another paper on this when I’ve worked a bit more with this model.<br />
<br />Physics hates singularities and one o  the problems with Relativity is the
act that it creates singularities, not only inside black holes, but also at th
e level o  the big bang. As a matter o  act, the mere act that black holes hav
e the “singularity” in common with the big bang leads one to the natural conclusion
that the big bang actually occured inside a black hole– and thus our universe itse
l  is inside a black hole inside, perhaps, an even larger universe. I wrote abou
t this a while back, and towards the end o  April, I saw a paper published about
this very possibility, by a physicist rom Indiana University. Any theory o  ev
erything will have to iron out the singularity issue as well as combining quantu
m physics, gravity and relativity under one umbrella.<br /><br />One o  the lead
ing rameworks or a theory o  everything is loop quantum gravity, in which the
basic ormula or density (mass/volume) breaks down under 10 planck lengths and
thus avoids the singularity issue. As a matter o  act, as you get closer and cl
oser to in initesimal volume– density goes down to near zero! Why does this happen
in LQG and not in Relativity? Because one o  the mistakes Einstein made was loo
king at space-time as a continuum, when as a matter o  act, it’s made o  discrete
particles at the Planck scale– in other words, as you get closer and closer to pl
anck scale size, the “holes” between the particles o  space-time get larger and larg
er in proportion and thus the total density o  the psuedo-singularity goes down.
Eventually, nothing is le t but the hole– thus density goes down to zero!<br /><b
r />All o  this is interconnected and this mere issue o  density going down to z
ero is what can make our universe exist inside a black hole. Not only that, it’s w
hat could make black hole – worm hole travel possible, since journeying through a
black hole with near zero density in the center (as opposed to in inite density
and unbearable gravity) is really impossible. But there’s a lot more.<br /><br />T
he above is one o  the reasons why there is a great disparity between quantum me
chanics and relativity. But there are others. One o  them is that space-time its
el  disappears at the quantum level. Locality itsel  breaks down! See my article
in the science orum about quantum teleportation and the new record distance o 
10 miles? I think that’s just the tip o  the ice berg. At the quantum level, ther
e is no “speed o  light barrier” and no concept o  “here” and “there”– as every part o  the
iverse is adjacent to every other part (since the origin o  the universe itsel 
was as a single particle) and this is why quantum teleportation, superposition a
nd tunneling can occur. Quantum e ects (according to some articles I’ve read) tra
vel as much as 10,000x times the speed o  light– and or this to happen, not only
must space itsel  break down at that level, but time must also break down. This
makes sense when one considers the act that space and time are just two sides o
 the same coin and to go aster than light, you have to break down the concept
o  time as well as space. Brian Greene makes just this sort o  proposal when he
talks about how space-time is just an arti act o  some more undamental e ect o
 the quantum level and by extension, so is relativity. This occurs on the subpl
anck level where space is replaced with hyperspace and time with imaginary time
(explained urther below) and these are the undamental dimensions o  the bulk,
the background abric o  the omniverse and the template upon which space-time (a
nd all higher dimensions) are built. It s also the source o  the great ultimate
duality o  the omniverse-- zero point energy and gravity (which is why gravity
is so strong in black holes)-- which balance each other out on the ultimate leve
l and keep the whole system rom either expanding into oblivion or collapsing in
upon itsel  like its individual island universes do. And Stephen Hawking said
recently that the only way or FTL or time travel to be possible is i  we can ta
ke quantum e ects and somehow make them mani est at our level– at the macroscopic
level.<br /><br />Well, i  we combine the ideas o  Hawking and Greene, with the
ideas presented in a recent paper by that physicist rom Indiana University we
come up with some interesting ideas. What i  our universe is a mere particle ins
ide a black hole inside a larger universe? Then it’s possible that what we call “mac
roscopic” on our scale is actually subplanck on the scale o  that larger universe– i
n other words– our whole universe would be nothing more than a quantum particle in
side that black hole inside that larger universe– and we would be subject to quant
um mechanics not relativity i  we could tunnel rom one point in our universe, t
hrough the black hole and back into another point in our universe (or even into
the larger universe– or some other universe entirely!) This would also explain the
large scale structures o  our universe– galaxies, superclusters, supervoids, etc,
as being a unction o  quantum e ects that the early universe was subject to.
Thus quantum e ects = macroscopic e ects on a higher level. As a matter o  ac
t, in lation o  the universe at many times light speed during its early history
was itsel  responsible or the creation o  matter and energy in the universe ro
m the transitioning o  the universe rom a higher to a lower energy state throug
h the actions o  the in laton scalar ield as it transitions to its lowest energ
y state. Thus conservation laws are maintained throughout the whole system. O  c
ourse, all this necessitates the existence o  the multiverse– or omniverse as I pu
t it (to allow or universes o  di erent physical laws, so that we dont have to
invoke the anthropic principle– that our universe is “special” in some way) to preser
ve causality and to allow or the act that all time– past, present and uture– exis
t at every moment– and thus (paradoxically enough!) time does not exist (at least
as we know it.) Poking a hole through our universe and into this larger universe
(or black hole) and back into another point in our own universe or into another
universe at low enough energies to be manageable by our technology at some utu
re state o  development would be analogous to superconductivity (or usion) at n
ear room temp.<br /><br />The idea o  our universe being a mere particle is an i
nteresting one and reminds me o  something which cosmologist Andrei Linde said (
author o  Chaotic In lation theory) concerning the idea that, inside the new Had
ron Collider, we might actually be producing our own microuniverses. The act th
at our universe may have itsel  been generated inside that larger universe by an
intelligent entity or entities is a possibility in the same sense. To us, the u
niverse would seem to be expanding, however, or some hypothetical being inside
that larger universe, since our space-time curves in upon itsel , no change woul
d be noted. How would this hypothetical being communicate its existence to us? P
erhaps in the very values o  the physical constants that we ind so puzzling– like
pi, the natural logarithm base e, the alpha ine structure constant, etc. These
numbers, which seem so random and meaningless on one hand and yet de ine all o 
reality as we know it on another hand might be the hint that being or beings un
known are giving us to be aware o  their existence. Perhaps one day we could do
the same inside an arti icially constructed universe o  our own making and desig
n….<br /><br />The ultimate ate o  the universe would also depend on conditions t
hat existed at its inception– at the big bang. Our universe exists inside a alse
vacuum that could tunnel into a true vacuum at any time– but doesnt. (Although the
re is concern that construction o  bigger and more power ul supercolliders could
get us there by the year 2150 or so, in which case– i  our universe ever did tunn
el to a true vacuum, it would change the undamental nature o  the universe, by
altering laws o  physics and make li e as we know it not possible– a very speculat
ive and noncheery thought ) Where loop quantum gravity and string theory come to
gether and attempt to explain the low value o  the cosmological constant is on t
his level– where the exponentially expanding universe expands so ast (thanks to d
ark energy) that bubbles o  lower energy vacuum ormed during the in lationary p
hase o  the universe (when it was expanding at much aster than light speeds) ne
ver collide and thus the universe would never tunnel to a lower energy vacuum an
d the bubbles would eventually dissipate. According to the cyclic model o  the u
niverse, the presence o  dark energy in our universe would not only expand the u
niverse, but at some point in the distant uture the interplay o  dark energy an
d gravity would halt the expansion and allow it to come back and collapse back o
n itsel  once again (as a natural result o  increasing entropy.) This would mean
that the big bang wasnt our universe’s only big bang, but just one o  many in a l
ong series– something which string theory and loop quantum gravity both seem to be
agreeing upon. I  this is the case, then at each big bang, the “walls” o  the unive
rse would turn inside out as the universe expanded in an opposite direction and
the existence o  time independent o  our universe (since our version o  time act
ually began with the most recent big bang) would be called imaginary time (imagi
nary in the same sense as imaginary numbers.) This is another concept which open
s up the idea o  the multiverse, because i  you imagine time existing on two axe
s, parallel time universes would be parallel lines plotted on a graph with both
axes. These parallel time universes would all have the same physical laws and wo
uld thus be part o  the same multiverse. Where the omniverse comes in is when yo
u have di erent universes with di erent alse energy values, which would bubbl
e up as a natural result o  space-time interactions with quantum e ects (a natu
ral extension o  what we call the Casimir e ect– but these virtual particles woul
d be their own universes), each with its own laws o  physics and, in a process a
kin to natural selection, these laws would determine the rate at which each o  t
hese bubble universes would decay and spawn child universes with lower energy st
ates and the survivability o  these universes would depend upon the various quan
tum components that lie therein. As a matter o  act, the existence o  our unive
rse inside a black hole inside a larger universe can be explained in this way– a v
irtual particle that survived the virtual phase and got sucked into a black hole
inside that larger universe (or, heh, perhaps intentionally placed in an arti i
cial one.) Child universes like ours could exist in a similar ashion inside bla
ck holes inside our own universe. The structure o  these other universes (and th
eir history and ultimate ate– early collapse, permanent expansion or oscillation– a
s well as the possible existence or types o  li e– and the spatial and time scales
and dimensions it exists within) might be very di erent rom ours, depending o
n their physical laws, when and i  in lation occured as a result o  the breakdow
n o  the in laton scalar ield, as well as quantum luctuations in the early his
tory o  the universe. Being inside the black hole would shelter the universe ro
m any possible catastrophe occuring on the “outside” and since the rate o  time (or
the very nature o  time itsel ) would be di erent in the larger universe compar
ed to the smaller one, they wouldnt be in causal contact (just like we wouldnt b
e with any universe with di erent physical laws.) The universes would be separa
ted by a sea o  hyperspace, the original spatial dimension o  the bulk (like ima
ginary time is the original temporal dimension), which can only be navigated thr
ough black hole worm hole tunnels, which represent the larger scale version o  q
uantum tunneling through the universe and between di erent universes. Its inte
resting how everything is connected together– that the very creation o  these mini
universes is the reason behind the expansion o  our own universe and perhaps its
ultimate collapse and rebirth (just like we might be doing or that hypothetica
l larger universe we reside within.)<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></div></div>
<!--- blogger s
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentIn o">
<div class="cmtcell"><a hre = http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.c m? useaction=blog.view& riendId=415169779&blogId=533583686 >2
:45 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a hre = http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.c m? useaction=blog.view& riendId=415169779&blogId=533583686 i
d= cmtCount_533583686 >0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a hre = # id= addCmt
Lnk_533583686 >Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount5'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl05_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(533583686);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_533583686" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 533583686);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 533583686);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 533583686);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5335836
86);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 533583686);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 533583686);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 533583686);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53358368
6);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 533583686);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 533583686);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 533583686);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 533583686);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 533583686);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 533583686);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 533583686);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 533583686);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
33583686);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 533583686);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 533583686);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 533583686);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53358368
6);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 533583686);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 533583686);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 533583686);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 533583686
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 533583686);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 533583686);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 533583686);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53358368
6);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 533583686);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 533583686);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 533583686);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 533583686
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 533583686);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 533583686);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 533583686);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 533583686);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 533583686);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 533583686);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 533583686);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 533583686);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=533583686'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=533583686'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
April 18, 2010 - Sunday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_532969442">Consciousness</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_532969442" class="blogContent"><br /><br />The universe has a beauty of i
ts own, like a fractal whose repeating patterns create unexpected combinations o
f complexity that retain hints of the underlying original; based in simplicity,
yet evolved into elegance. <br /><br /><br />As for laws of physics, I hope yo
u know that the specific "laws" change from the level of the subatomic (quantum
mechanics) to the level of classical physics (newtonian) to the level of relativ
ity (cosmological scale.) Basically, what this is implying is that the "laws" of
physics as we know them are a subset of a greater series of laws that we are, a
t this point, too technologically inept to discover (and probably wont until we
get down to the Planck scale-- or lower-- which even the supercollider wont be a
ble to do.) With that said, I personally don't think reincarnation exists-- but
I wouldn't presume to dictate my thoughts to anyone else-- obviously, each perso
n has a right to think what they want. This might seem absurd, but it might all
boil down to whatever a person thinks is going to happen is what's going to happ
en to them. And, I can envision scenarios where the superset of physical laws of
which we know only a subset wouldn't take much of a tweaking to separate consci
ousness from our physical bodies-- and once you do that, pretty much anything is
game. I remember reading an article in a journal (an abstract of which I posted
a year or so ago) about scientists discovering intelligence and a higher level
of consciousness than anyone expected in a unicellular organism (something which
none of the working models could possibly envision) and how it could pave the w
ay to changing how we think-- literally! The idea of a collective unconscious s
preading throughout the universe has gained quite a following, and its conceivab
le that ESP and sixth senses are simply a manifestation of such-- like ripples u
ndulating across the cosmic web of consciousness-- which would make sense, since
these extra senses seem to be particularly perceptive when they involve a perso
n close to us being in peril, even if they are far away in distance-- which woul
d not matter, as the majority of our consciousness, and thus who we are, exists
in higher dimensions (which makes what we perceive as consciousness just a shado
w of what we really are). Using this model as our guide, consciousness would tr
uly be immortal, as in extra dimensions, not only do the spatial dimensions not
exist, but time doesnt exist either!<br /><br />Well, I suppose if a unicellular
organism can have some level of intelligence/consciousness like in that journal
article I quoted earlier, that would probably include bacteria. What's central
to this argument is what consciousness really is and that is something no one r
eally agrees about. For myself I find myself attracted to the quantum theories
of consciousness because its fascinating the way reality works on that level. T
he fact is that any classical mechanics approach to consciousness has hit a bric
k wall.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />We are a "manifestation" of the universe.
The thing we cant get away from is the fact that we arent independent observers-
- we ourselves are a part of the universe we're observing and this, I think, is
the reason why we make intuitive leaps when new scientific discoveries are made.
We have an innate knowledge of the workings of the universes inside our minds-
- because our minds are a part of said universe-- and so, while it may seem that
revolutionary ideas like Relativity and Quantum Mechanics came out of "thin air
" (like many discoveries-- for example the chemical structure of the Benzene rin
g came in a "dream")-- its more likely innate knowledge of the universe that we
are a part of that's inside of us. Did you ever read about platonic solids? The
y're these special three dimensional geometric shapes Plato created and named an
d said were the perfect forms of nature... thousands of yars later chemists disc
overed that crystalline compounds do indeed take those complex shapes! And our
immense curiosity to learn as much as we can can be seen as the universe trying
to learn more about itself. I'd like to think there are countless intelligent
species across the universe trying to accomplish the same thing.<br /><br />I li
ke to think that we are part of a manifestation of the universe that occupies va
rious corporeal (for lack of a better term) forms in an attempt to experience it
self. Under that premise, I would think of consciousness like matter, not able t
o be created or destroyed, but able to change states and transition to different
planes of existence.<br /><br />All religions are diluted by the environment un
der which they were born and flourished. Ive always thought that humankind take
s what he/she can understand of the "truth" (if an absolute truth even exists) a
nd waters it down to what he/she is familiar with-- and thus, religion is born.
So we have things like people being made in the "image of God," etc. (oh really
, then what about the possibly thousands of other alien civilizations that might
exist across the universe-- are they made thusly also?) I do think each religi
on takes a kernel of truth and evolves a mythology around it to make that kernel
of truth more palatable.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />I believe the "soul" conc
ept was created by religion because at its inception no one knew what the concep
t of "consciousness" meant. And we still dont lol.<br /><br />Referring to the
law of conservation of mass-energy, mass is a form of energy and can be created
or destroyed through particle-antiparticle annihilation or e=mc^2 but since mass
is just another type of energy its just a phase transition. At any rate the co
nservation of mass-energy itself appeared to be broken when it was discovered th
at virtual particles can be created or destroyed for brief periods of time (Casi
mir Effect) but more than likely, this is proof of the existence of a multiverse
, where the conservation law is maintained across different dimensions and/or un
iverses (or parts of our universe) as matter gets winked out of existence in one
part of the multiverse, only to wink into another part-- seemingly out of nowhe
re. My theory was that this is the result of microblackhole-wormholes embedded
inside quantum foam The different planes of existence idea is central to my es
say "Origin" and was probably first popularized through the ancient Greeks by th
e great philosopher Plato (read "The Allegory of the Cave.") The idea of multip
le dimensions, long a niche of science fiction writers, was brought to the foref
ront of physics by Hugh Everett and his MWI (Many Worlds Interpretation) and it,
along with the standard model, are the two most influential interpretations of
quantum mechanics. The reason why MWI is gaining popularity is because it offer
s an easier approach to the unification of the 4 fundamental forces as well as t
he origin of the big bang and what happened before. Its interesting that both m
ajor theories of unification (string theory and loop quantum gravity) contain th
e central idea that there was another universe before the big bang, it collapsed
and then our universe came to be-- and this cycle might continue indefinitely,
not only here-- but in other universes with their own sets of physical laws-- wh
ich would be a way around the problem of fine tuning (why are the laws of physic
s the way they are in our universe?) <br /><br /><br />Ive seen some scientists
themselves question the dogmatic closeminded approach of their peers (let's face
it, most new scientific ideas were met with mockery at first)-- I think its par
t of human nature to always assume that one is right-- people just dont like fee
ling like they just dont know-- it removes their sense of control over their env
ironment and makes them feel insecure and vulnerable.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br
/>I like to think of reality as being a multifaceted existence that has so many
twists and turns that its like a labyrinth, and evey time you think you have th
e path all figured out, it morphs into something completely new and different.<b
r /><br /><br /><br />It's the ultimate power of the "uncertainty principle" as
soon as you feel like you're coming close to figuring it out it shows another fa
cet for you to learn.<br /><br /><br />I think that our consciousness does exist
in the higher dimensions and that helps to explain it as well as ESP and things
like creativity, intuition and instinct. I believe that animals also have cons
ciousness that extends into the higher dimensions and it explains things like gr
oup memory and innate instincts which they are seemingly born with (all creature
s and even inanimate objects contain all the memories of their kind buried withi
n and even of the ones they inhabited the plane with along with their predecesso
rs, which would be accessible, like a fossilized record, given enough patience a
nd energy.) We all tap into a collective subconscious that helps us analyze eve
rything around us on a higher level, make intuitive leaps (sort of like informat
ional wormholes going through extra dimensional shortcuts!) and thought experime
nts. Perhaps when we make these thought experiments we really are doing what we
are thinking about in these higher dimensions, where physical action isnt neces
sary in order to perform work-- because of the much higher energy level of the b
ulk and the ability of the mind to focus that energy. This would fit in nicely
with ESP also. All of creation, great and small, has consciousness-- even inani
mate objects. Its just a matter of degree. Plants have a higher level of consc
iousness than rocks, for example, and their consciousness extends further into t
he bulk. Animals exceed plants and so their consciousness penetrates the bulk e
ven further than that-- with human beings having the greatest penetration into t
he bulk of them all (out of earthly creatures.) The same goes for penetration i
nto this side of reality (which is why we can speculate about what's going on at
the other end of the universe or about the far flung past and the far away futu
re and other animals cant.) But while consciousness is most concentrated in us,
the sheer size of the oceans and the continents and of the earth itself gives i
t the greatest total amount of conscious energy; its just much more spread out,
diffuse and operates on a very low frequency hum. Just like with all creatures
and objects, tapping into this energy would open up a vast reservoir of historic
al and future knowledge for us (like telling us when the next earthquake might h
it and where or when and where the next hurricane might strike or going into the
past, we could see back to the origin of life or the last death cries of animal
s during a mass extinction)-- for the power of conscious energy is not only depe
ndent on size and concentration of the energy but also on the age of the creatur
e or object. The sun has much more conscious energy than the earth; not only be
cause of its size, but because of its electromagnetic properties, particularly i
ts strong magnetic field. The stronger the magnetic field, the stronger the con
sciousness-- regardless of size. (Just think of the consciousness levels of pul
sars and rapidly rotating black holes that swallow information by the ton!) If
you want to see an even more vast consciousness that operates on an even lower f
requency consider the galaxy (again active galaxies with strong magnetic fields,
such as M87, have the highest consciousness-- and clusters and superclusters ev
en more so) or even the universe itself-- whose conscious energy can actually b
e measured as the CMB-- and as such is gradually going down in terms of concentr
ation but staying the same in terms of overall strength (this being a fundamenta
l conservational law of consciousness within each universe-- that even upon deat
h, the consciousness gets redistributed, whether in our universe or its antivers
e) and once it gets to nil it will big bang again-- the most epic scale of reinc
arnation there is! The full history of the universe is written in the CMB and h
opefully we will one day become evolved enough to read and decipher it. The amo
unt of subconscious energy of every creature and object in the omniverse-- let a
lone our universe-- is written in the ZPE of the bulk and this is where it resid
es, forming its connections and creating the collective. As a matter of fact, t
he full history of all universes, including the ones that predated us pre Big Ba
ng resides in the energy of the ZPE and could be accessed as the collective cons
ciousness gets more evolved and powerful (Kardashev scale 3 or higher?) The "in
side out" theory of LQG facilitates this in shedding the universal consciousness
into the bulk upon each Big Bang (both conscious and subconscious come together
), only to begin anew. In contrast, the amount of conscious energy of each crea
ture and object resides within the ZPE of the space-time fabric of its particula
r universe during its existence. And consciousness isnt something that stays st
atic, as it can vary between individuals and even in the same person depending u
pon health, time of day, interactions, etc. Higher penetration leads to a great
er display of properties of ESP and a feeling of connectedness-- including creat
ivity, intuition and ESP. I think you can draw an analogy between the conscious
/subconscious mind and the structure of quantum foam both on our side of the spa
ce-time fabric and the bridge into the bulk. The conscious side is the part on
our side of the space-time fabric and the subconscious is the part on the other
side. Think of it also in terms of leftbrainedness and rightbrainedness. Those
who are more connected to the subconscious are literally so, with more of their
mind on the bulk side of the divide, connected therein to the "collective subco
nscious." Those whose minds like to think in more concrete terms have a stronge
r connection on this side of the fabric-- the "conscious" side. This isnt a sta
tic feature; like I said before, it changes with exposure to the environment-- s
uch as encountering other "connected individuals"-- and to changes in health (ph
ysical and emotional) and at different points in one's development and life. As
with quantum foam, we can create similar black hole - wormhole pairs, but in th
is case we're talking about informational bridges. An informational black hole
would be someone who can suck in information from other individual's subconsciou
s or from the collective (a "receiver.") An informational worm hole would be
someone who can deliver information to others' subconscious (a "sender.") Some
will be one or the other; others will be both. In all cases, since we are talki
ng about thought processes occuring outside space-time, there is no regard for d
istance or time; the information can be received across unconnected space or eve
n through parallel timelines. Sometimes involuntarily (which can cause confusio
n) as the person might not know they are receiving or sending (that is, they are
"untrained"), which is one of the properties which affects how strong the abili
ties are-- and the property most prone to change their strength (this is stronge
st in children, as their minds are the most flexible to learn new things.) Peop
le with these special abilities can even communicate with animals (since animals
also have a conscious/subconscious structure) and might be able to perceive suc
h things as ghosts and spirits, which are trapped on the barrier which separates
a universe from its antiverse (whereas perhaps normal spirits merely pass throu
gh to the other side and are reincarnated in antimatter form in a cyclic pattern
. This would also explain why animals and children are more keen on sensing pre
sences, as they have been less conditioned by the concrete environment, which ma
kes up for lack of training and, in the case of animals, lesser ability.) If al
ien species exist, and I think they do, we can even communicate with them throug
h the collective subconscious, as their minds would be subject to the same rules
and abilities-- except, depending on the evolutionary development of the specie
s, they might be much stronger and more concentrated than ours. Tapping into t
he minds of the oldest alien civilizations in the universe would be like tapping
into the history of the universe itself (regardless of whether it was made of m
atter or energy or both!) The vehicle of delivery or sending information can be
as varied as anything from dreams to remote viewing to telepathy and can even be
made to do physical work such as psychokinesis or teleportation. Its even poss
ible that the act of conducting thought experiments really are experiments being
conducted by our subconscious through action in the bulk. Its possible that re
-experiencing memories or anticipating future actions or telepathy is nothing mo
re than time travel through the bulk, while viewing our memories through portals
in the fabric of space-time (perhaps this is the case with all thought experime
nts or creative ventures also)-- and sometimes it actually feels that way! In
these thought experiments or dreams we can rewind time, freeze it, or fast forwa
rd it and freeze it at a particular moment and analyze the full experience the s
ame way a video replay would-- a talent Da Vinci is said to have possessed to a
high degree. And the subconscious can even extract the energy of our life force
and create such things as astral projection or out of body experiences. What g
ives it the ability to perform such incredible feats? Its simple: at the quantu
m level the definition of space and time break down and the properties of nonloc
ality (entanglement, superposition, tunneling, teleportation, etc.) take over.
It is the very quantum nature of our minds that enables our minds to understand
the universe-- for we are made of the same fundamental matter and energy the uni
verse is made of and were created at the apex of the current evolutionary pathwa
y in an attempt by the universe to understand itself. This desire to understand
itself is such an intrinsic and basic quality that is built into every being th
at it exists on both sides of the space-time fabric. Collectively, its called "
curiosity." The vehicle for its delivery and processing can be divided into the
concrete and conscious (this side of space-time) aspects such as analytical and
deductive reasoning and the abstract (the bulk or subconscious) aspects such as
inductive reasoning, intuition (this is when we arent quite sure of how we know
something-- we just know it) and creativity-- the basic building force of the u
niverse both physically and mentally. Even when our creativity just involves vi
sual processing in our brain such as thought experiments, work is being done in
the bulk-- the actual experiments are being performed and energy is being focuse
d and used. This is the same for any creative or intellectual endeavor (like fi
nding patterns, coming up with new ideas, etc.) , whether actual physical work i
s performed or not on our side of space-time. When doing thought experiments or
exhibiting creativity our minds can simulate 3D space-time in the bulk, the sam
e way we do "here." For further info refer to the article at the end of my pape
r. Creativity is the greatest force in the universe and resides within us as mu
ch as it does in the universe as a whole (since we are a part of it.) The frequ
encies that inspire creativity within us are shared by the cosmos as the frequen
cies of vibrating strings that inspire the evolution of large scale structures i
n the universe and beyond-- these are the undefinable but instinctive quantities
that make us appreciate and adore creativity within others, in nature and the e
ntirety of the cosmos and want us to replicate it ourselves. Its the central ur
ge of the universe coursing through our veins! Even destruction has its place i
n creativity, both on our level and the scale of the omniverse, as it merely mak
es room for recycling and creation into a new form (nothing is ever truly destro
yed any way, just changed and reorganized into a new form.) As an example of su
bconsious creativity, when I was writing Origin 2, I could literally feel myself
in the bulk seeing these interactions occuring with my inner eyes! I guess the
part of the universe that is centered on my brain was learning a bit about itse
lf. What would be the peak or apex of the abilities of the collective subconsci
ous? Nothing less than a universe-wide linkage of all life, great and small, pl
ant, animal, human and alien as well as all inanimate objects, in universal harm
ony with a decided destiny. In other words, if we take it on a planetary level
to simplify matters, it would mean that all animate and inanimate objects on the
planet would vibrate on the same frequencies and there would be total and compl
ete understanding among all-- there would be no secrets, nothing hidden and no r
eason for lies. We could sense each others' presences even when we and they wer
ent in perceptual range (Im not just talking about one person sensing another pe
rson's presence via the subconscious, Im talking about a total experience where
we would know what every other creature was thinking and doing and where every o
bject was and what was happening with it and within it.) Imagine extending this
to the galactic level, let alone universe level.... talk about informational ov
erload! We would have to learn to dump the excess information into the bulk, in
to the webwork of ZPE from where it originated and where it belongs or to just i
gnore it and let it stay there.<br /><br /> Consider that when we die, our consc
iousness shifts to a higher (or lower) resonance, and we shift into an adjacent
universe. In turn, energy from that or a different universe, shifts into ours as
a birth. Populations differences are in constant flux across all these realitie
s, with some declining, some increasing, but the grand total of energy remains c
onstant. But occasionally, anomalies occur. Sometimes, a reprogramming of the pa
ttern of energy is incomplete, and part of the “hard drive” remains intact. This inc
omplete formatting results in left over memory data being left behind, and a rec
all of portions of it will be present. The rareness of these glitches are refle
cted in the very low reported incidents of reincarnation. As a matter of fact,
this occurs with recall of cellular memory in some reciepients of donor organs a
lso. As stated earlier, consciousness is present to some degree in all forms of
matter and energy-- animate and inanimate. It's just more concentrated in livi
ng organisms. The cell is the smallest unit of the animate (on earth, anyway.)
And each cell possesses consciousness and even the full DNA of the whole. It h
as been found that unicellular organisms have a level of intelligence and consci
ousness, so why shouldnt individual cells of a larger organism also have them?
And they do! But in service of the organism and for the good of the whole, thei
r cellular memories get buried. But they are there and sometimes manifest thems
elves when an organ gets transplanted, as donor memories. The cells are confuse
d about what happened to the organism they used to inhabit and they manifest the
ir independence in this way, just as much as the recepient's body does when anti
bodies try to attack these foreign cells.<br /><br />Love and creativity are int
imately linked and enhance each other. However, for greater detail into my view
s regarding love, please refer to my essay "The Philosophy of Love." Suffice it
to say that love enhances all the connections through the extra power that posi
tive emotions offer. Like conscience/subconscience, love has both a physical an
d a metaphysical aspect and the former has connections on our side of space-time
, while the latter has networks in the bulk, having been born of the subconsciou
s and metaphysical energy which partially comes from transmigration (and thus th
e wisdom of age beyond normal time.) It also has the power to heal through pray
er, psychic healing and enhances the abilities of ESP, such as when a loved one
knows when we are in trouble or seems to be so connected to us that they can sen
se what we are about to do or say before it even happens across distance and tim
e. Self sacrifice is the highest form of love, as it shows a recognition that t
he best parts of us exist within the ones we love and who love us and will survi
ve long after we are gone and get passed down from generation to generation. Th
is extends to animals and animal-human interactions also (as a matter of fact, i
t can be said to be stronger with animals and children because they dont let the
environment, that is the physical aspects of love which come from genetics and
our biology, taint the way they look at metaphysical love-- also called uncondit
ional love-- with the physical environment, until they reach school age that is!
) This is an enhancement of the informational wormhole I wrote of earlier. Whe
n two beings procreate (any two beings!), they are fulfilling the ultimate missi
on of love: to create another life form. In so doing, the new being both posses
ses physical aspects of the love of the originals (genetic) which resides in our
part of space-time, as well as metaphysical attributes, which can come from a v
ariety of sources, including the environment, parents and transmigration. The c
onscious part of the mind, the physical aspect, has its origin in the genes and
biology of the parents also, while the metaphysical atttribute comes from the la
tter multitude of sources which mix together to create a new pattern-- which is
exactly why recollection of reincarnation, with certain exceptions (or regressiv
e hypnosis) can be so difficult. Dreams can be of great help in this area, as t
hat is when the conscious mind is resting and the subconscious takes over (which
is why various facets of ESP also seem stronger during dreaming.) Not only do
we get a part of our consciousness and love from our parents and other people in
our lives-- but we also give back and this two way reaction (feedback) results
in appreciation of who we are and who they are and what we each mean to each oth
er. We even do the same with our pets and other animals and plants we encounter
and even inanimate objects we create or work with, such as artwork, writing, sc
ulpture or architecture or utilitarian tools like computers, chairs, desks, tabl
es bathtubs and beds and their original sources and the people who created and/o
r prepared them for us. When we eat and drink, we absorb part of the consciousn
ess of where it came from and who prepared it and who created it, while the rest
goes towards transmigration. There is a transference of consciousness back and
forth between the creator and the object as well as anyone else who appreciates
it (in most cases the transference is strongest with the creator, but sometimes
the appreciators overwhelm by sheer volume of numbers or because they have a sp
ecial relationship with the creator.) The total conscious energy of the entire
cosmos might remain the same, but its redistribution results in much closer conn
ections over the long run. Regrettably, so called toxic relationships also happ
en, as they are glitches in the hardware and they cause much misery for however
long they last-- but they go against the basic plan of the cosmos. And not only
can love enhance ESP, but so can confidence. That positive energy we feel is r
eal and can be made to do work and to improve the whole mind/body interaction (i
ncluding medical and psychological health and well being as well as relationship
s) and reinforce our connections and networks. Our aura, which is the electroma
gnetic manifestation of the health of our consciousness and its connections to o
thers and an analog to a node of the CMB, is a reflection of this. There is als
o such a thing as the aura of the collective (an analog of the full CMB), which
can be measured (and has been seen to take a huge hit after disasters such as 9/
11 or the Indonesian Tsunami-- which animals did much better in, because of thei
r very strong metaphysical connections, displayed as the instinct to read the si
gns the planet was giving them subconsciously and survive.) We also have a subc
onscious version of the aura, which exists in the bulk within the ZPE and grows
and wanes with the strength of our confidence and all the other factors which af
fect the strength of our subconscious connections (its like a muscle, it needs t
o be used.) Upon death, besides transmigration, parts of our consciousness and
love also exists in the memories of those who survive us and this gets passed do
wn from generation to generation, through discussion and even through genetics,
diluted through the various offspring-- but still, always present (the sum total
always remains the same, as per conservation laws-- even if some gets distribut
ed to inanimate objects we create or pets or other animals and plants we cherish
.) Even extinct animals like dinosaurs pass on their genes to their descendant
s-- so various species of birds like cranes, which have an ancient lineage, woul
d be the closest to them and still retain some of their characteristics-- both o
n a physical (genetic) level and a metaphysical (subconscious) level. The consc
iousness represents a complex interplay between the physical and the nonphysical
and if one falls ill, the other one will suffer also. This is how psychologica
l illness can affect white blood cell counts or how distinct personalities in mu
tiple personality disorder can be affected differently by different drugs, altho
ugh theyre in the same body (multiple personality disorder or dissociative ident
ity disorder may be considered a case of more than one consciousness occupying t
he same body-- as can some cases of possession-- in that case, the occupying con
sciousness belongs on the other side.) I see us as finally evolving towards Uni
versal Love, which includes all animate and inanimate matter and energy and when
we finally reach this peak of evolution then and only then will we finally real
ize our full potential and maximize our connections and abilities. I fear that
this may only happen just as our universe is about to reach the peak of its expa
nsion, just before starting to collapse inwardly and by then there will be no ma
tter, only energy (including us) and we will then start to lose our memories as
we collapse towards the next big bang and the energy begins to leak into the bul
k, trying futilely to remember what will be forever stored in the bulk-- if we c
an only be lucky enough to extract that information with the next expansion from
the library of energy which resides there (but, alas, we will have to begin ane
w-- like reaching the top step and then falling back down to the bottom of the s
taircase), as it has for each cycle!<br /><br />For more information on the brea
kdown of space-time and of how it's a construct of perception, rather than reali
ty, refer to the following:<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.msp
links.com/MDFodHRwOi8vamNlci5jb20vaW5kZS4uLi92aWV3RmlsZS8xMS8xMA==">http://jcer.
com/inde.../viewFile/11/10</a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Abstract<br />
<br /><br />Recent research on time shows that one has to distinguish between ph
ysical time and psychological time. Physical time is run of clocks in space. Spa
ce itself is timeless. With clocks we measure material change i.e. motion that h
appen in space. Linear psychological time “past-present-future” is a result of neuro
nal activity of the brain. Observer is experiencing material change through psyc
hological time. Observer is unchangeable and independent of psychological time r
unning. This indicates that observer is not based on neuronal activity of the br
ain as psychological time is. Space and observer are both timeless. Here a propo
sal is taken that physical basis of the observer is space itself. In scientific
exploration the process of observation is the function of space. Hypothetically
every point of space has the function of observation. Human senses and brain are
biological devices through which space experiences material change i.e. motion
in space. Observer as a function of space is an integral part of the universe. T
his view opens new perspectives in understanding of Lorentz transformation and “pr
oper time” of different inertial systems in Special Theory of Relativity.<br /></d
iv>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532969442'>1
:19 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532969442' i
d='cmtCount_532969442'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_532969442'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount6'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl06_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(532969442);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_532969442" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 532969442);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 532969442);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 532969442);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5329694
42);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 532969442);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 532969442);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 532969442);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53296944
2);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 532969442);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 532969442);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 532969442);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 532969442);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 532969442);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 532969442);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 532969442);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 532969442);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
32969442);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 532969442);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 532969442);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 532969442);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53296944
2);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 532969442);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 532969442);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 532969442);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 532969442
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 532969442);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 532969442);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 532969442);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53296944
2);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 532969442);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 532969442);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 532969442);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 532969442
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 532969442);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 532969442);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 532969442);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 532969442);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 532969442);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 532969442);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 532969442);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 532969442);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=532969442'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=532969442'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
April 12, 2010 - Monday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_532637379">Origin II-- The Quest For Proof</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_532637379" class="blogContent"><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwO
i8vcGh5c2ljcy5lc290ZWMub3JnL1VuaWZpY2F0aW9uX29mX1BoeXNpY3MtMS5wZGY=">http://phys
ics.esotec.org/Unification_of_Physics-1.pdf</a><br /><br /><div><a href="http://
www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LmVzb3RlYy5vcmcvcGh5c2ljcy9pbmRleC5odG1s">http:
//www.esotec.org/physics/index.html</a><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /><
br /><br />The Planck length is related to Planck energy by the uncertainty prin
ciple. At this scale, the concepts of size and distance break down, as quantum i
ndeterminacy becomes virtually absolute. This makes the Planck scale a fascin
ating realm for speculation by theoretical physicists from various schools of th
ought. Is the Planck scale domain a seething mass of virtual black holes? Is it
a fabric of unimaginably fine loops or a spin foam network? Is it interpenetrate
d by innumerable Calabi-Yau manifolds,[1] which connect our 3-dimensional univer
se with a higher dimensional space? Perhaps our 3-D universe is 'sitting' on a '
brane'[2] which separates it from a 2, 5, or 10-dimensional universe and this ac
counts for the apparent 'weakness' of gravity in ours. These approaches, among s
everal others, are being considered to gain insight into Planck scale dynamics.
This would allow physicists to create a unified description of all the fundament
al forces. <br /><br />Sub-Planck physics Sub-Planck refers to conjectural phys
ics beyond or smaller than the Planck scale. The Elegant Universe[1] by Brian G
reene discusses briefly the strange world of the sub-Planck and how it "creates"
the quantum universe by its averages. In his later work, The Fabric of the Cosm
os, Greene states that "the familiar notion of space and time do not extend into
the sub-Planckian realm, which suggests that space and time as we currently und
erstand them may be mere approximations to more fundamental concepts that still
await our discovery." <br /><br /><br /><br />My questions: <br /><br />Do other
universes exist on our subplanck scale and is our universe on the subplanck sca
le of a larger "hyperverse?" I implied this possibility when I indicated that
our universe might just be a subatomic particle in a larger universe. What if
our universe is nothing more than a subatomic particle inside a larger universe
and our universe is less than planck length inside the larger universe-- and th
ere are sub universes which are smaller than planck length inside our own univer
se.... this would explain why laws of physics break down at these sizes-- the la
ws of the other universes take over. <br /><br /><br /><br />That's why I was
so excited when I found the paper about to be published about the physicist from
IU conducting research in this area and that the idea of a universe inside a bl
ackhole nested inside a larger universe might be our best hope of a unification
of gravity, relativity and quantum mechanics.<br /><br />I like this idea-- it m
akes it seem reality is circular-- who knows, maybe distance and size are so mea
ningless that when you zoom in far enough you get back to the universe you origi
nally started from <br /><br />I really like the idea of a circular reality wher
e, after going through a bunch of universes you'd eventually get back to where y
ou started because it avoids the problem of infinitely large or infinitely small
scales, and a circular reality seems to fit well with the idea of a cyclic univ
erse Although, to be more accurate, I would say that the omniverse has a weblik
e structure, in that all of the universes are interconnected, with Layer 1 paral
lel timeverses branching off to the side, while Layer 2 multiverses are "spokes"
in the web, each with their own satellite timeverses. These spokes, and the in
terconnected weblike structure of the omniverse in general harks back to ZPE, wh
ich is also arranged thusly, and perhaps the omniverse's outline is based on tha
t framework, and thus borrows its shape from the geometric arrangement of ZPE in
the bulk.<br /><br />And so begins Origin II-- The Quest for Proof. It looks l
ike research is picking up the pace, as LHC is now operational (for the time bei
ng) and the aforementioned IU physicist has published his paper a mere two weeks
after I published the "original" Origin. It can be found here: <a href="http:
//www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBoeXNvcmcuY29tL25ld3MxODk3OTI4MzkuaHRtbA=="
>http://www.physorg.com/news189792839.html</a><br /><br />Our universe at home w
ithin a larger universe? So suggests wormhole research<br /><br />Enlarge<br />A
pril 6, 2010 <br />Enlarge<br /><br />Einstein-Rosen bridges like the one visual
ized above have never been observed in nature, but they provide theoretical phys
icists and cosmologists with solutions in general relativity by combining models
of black holes and white holes.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MD
FodHRwOi8vUGh5c09yZy5jb20=">PhysOrg.com</a>) -- Could our universe be located wi
thin the interior of a wormhole which itself is part of a black hole that lies w
ithin a much larger universe?<br /><br />In studying the radial motion through t
he event horizon (a black hole's boundary) of two different types of black holes
-- Schwarzschild and Einstein-Rosen, both of which are mathematically legitimat
e solutions of general relativity -- Poplawski admits that only experiment or ob
servation can reveal the motion of a particle falling into an actual black hole.
But he also notes that since observers can only see the outside of the black ho
le, the interior cannot be observed unless an observer enters or resides within.
<br /><br />"This condition would be satisfied if our universe were the interior
of a black hole existing in a bigger universe," he said. "Because Einstein's ge
neral theory of relativity does not choose a time orientation, if a black hole c
an form from the gravitational collapse of matter through an event horizon in th
e future then the reverse process is also possible. Such a process would describ
e an exploding white hole: matter emerging from an event horizon in the past, li
ke the expanding universe."<br /><br />A white hole is connected to a black hole
by an Einstein-Rosen bridge (wormhole) and is hypothetically the time reversal
of a black hole. Poplawski's paper suggests that all astrophysical black holes,
not just Schwarzschild and Einstein-Rosen black holes, may have Einstein-Rosen b
ridges, each with a new universe inside that formed simultaneously with the blac
k hole.<br /><br />"From that it follows that our universe could have itself for
med from inside a black hole existing inside another universe," he said.<br /><b
r />By continuing to study the gravitational collapse of a sphere of dust in iso
tropic coordinates, and by applying the current research to other types of black
holes, views where the universe is born from the interior of an Einstein-Rosen
black hole could avoid problems seen by scientists with the Big Bang theory and
the black hole information loss problem which claims all information about matte
r is lost as it goes over the event horizon (in turn defying the laws of quantum
physics).<br /><br />This model in isotropic coordinates of the universe as a b
lack hole could explain the origin of cosmic inflation, Poplawski theorizes.<br
/><br />Its wonderful to see ideas dovetail like this towards a common destinati
on, as this is exactly where my thought experiment is leading to also. The Ekry
ptotic Model also jives with this, and creates new universes through brane colli
sion (like with M-theory.) That the ancients came suspiciously close to this mo
del of the omniverse makes me wonder if our brains arent the only tool we need t
o solve the universe and unification riddle! As a matter of fact, I can extend
this further, and theorize that the omniverse that our universe resides within,
had a unitary origin-- that is, it originated in one dimension, one force, one p
lane of existence-- and from wherein emerged everything else, our three spatial
dimensions plus time plus the four forces and even the higher dimensions theoriz
ed by M-theory, not to mention the parallel timeverses and other multiverses in
the omniverse also. This is where Imaginary Time comes in. That's the "time b
efore time" or the time outside of space-time, which existed before the last big
bang. Im playing around with the idea that there's an "Imaginary Space" also (
which scifi writers call "hyperspace") which exists outside of our space-time an
d is the "sea" (in other words, in the bulk) that separates the universes and fr
om which our 3 spatial dimensions emerged, just like time emerged from "Imaginar
y Time." Well, the way this would work is, the same way "cutting" through hyper
space would get you between two distant nonconnected points in space, "cutting"
through imaginary time (maybe we should just call it hypertime) would get you be
tween two distant nonconnected points in time. And thus, in a single shot, we c
an have both "effective" faster than light travel ("effective" because it doest
really mean youre going faster than light, but merely taking a shortcut), as wel
l as time travel. This is what happens when particles or photons exhibit quant
um entanglement, superposition, teleportation, etc and violate locality, and thi
s is also what happens in closed timelike curves. All the spatial dimensions or
iginated from that one hyperspatial dimension and that all the temporal dimensio
ns emerged from that imaginary time dimension. In other words, those two dimens
ions are the "quarks" of all the dimensions we see today, as well as the additio
nal dimensions of M-theory. Basically, it means that on a really small scale (c
alled subplanck) space-time ceases to exist and imaginary space/ imaginary time
take over-- thus permitting this kind of strange behavior on the quantum level.
This where I left things off in Origin, and as research continues in this area,
and I refine my theories, I will continue with my work. Hopefully the LHC or i
ts successor will get us to the subplanckian scale and -- who knows-- we might e
ven construct our first black holes (baby universes?) and be able to examine the
seeds of a new reality ourselves firsthand!<br /><br />In Origin, I never got a
round to talking about Loop Quantum Gravity, as its a theory that competes with
String Theory. I find it quite intriguing however, that LQG also allows for a u
niverse to have existed before the big bang, and removes the big bang singularit
y (as well as black hole singularities) by calling for black hole densities to a
ctually go down as their core diameter decreases to under 10 Planck lengths. Ho
w does it do this? Well, in LQG (like in string theory) space-time is made up o
f discrete units (unlike Relativity, in which space-time is a continuum), and th
is quantized version of space-time (the discrete units are of the Planck length)
are arranged in spin networks. By removing singularities, it goes where Relati
vity and Quantum Mechanics cant go by themselves and even attempts to describe w
hat lies beyond the edge of space-time (in other words, inside the "singularitie
s.") None of our physics at the present time (not even LQG or string theory) ca
n account for what occurs on the subplanck scale-- thus, some heretofore unknown
physics is probably involved there-- which would likely unify everything-- one
dimension, one force, one fabric to describe the whole omniverse! Likely, the o
utline of the omniverse is written on the face of ZPE at that level and-- we can
dream-- maybe the history of all the universes that lie within; not only the su
perstructure of the superclusters and supervoids, but of each individual galaxy,
star, planet, even forms of life! Like a fossilized record, but not only conta
ining the past and present, but perhaps the future also who knows, maybe people
with premonitions can read ZPE data subconsciously-- after all, our brains are p
art of the structure of the universe and would likely be able to accomplish that
task on a deeper level.) In that sense, it might have great predictive value t
o show us exactly where our universe (and maybe even our species) is going-- whe
ther its a cyclic universe, as I suspect, or something else. Virtual particles
would be on the border between space-time and hyperspace-time and thus would win
k into and out of existence as they travel from one disconnected point in space-
time to another (or to another universe entirely) through microblackhole-wormhol
e bridges (which might actually be other universes with different dimensions tha
n ours) embedded within the quantum foam. Now, how much information we can read
out of the ZPE depends upon the constraints of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Princ
iple; we might only be able to read a broad overview of the history of the omniv
erse, or we might need new physics to probe beyond the level of the Heisenberg U
ncertainty Principle. Another intriguing fact is that, with the idea that our u
niverse formed inside a black hole, the holographic principle comes into play.
And it dovetails with the idea that the history of our universe can be described
on a flat surface, the same way the holographic principle is applied to convent
ional black holes (which are, in all likelihood, the "outside" of other universe
s in their own right.)<br /><br />Anyway, as I stated earlier, LQG allows for a
pre-big bang universe, and the best way to picture this is to imagine a balloon
collapsing. This would be the universe prior to ours. As it collapses to a sin
gle point, the opposite sides of the balloon would go through each other, and th
e universe would expand once again, but this time its sides would be reversed.
If LQG is correct, the strength of gravity should massively increase on nanoscop
ic scales (because gravity is less diluted at this scale with only one or two di
mensions to deal with)-- this is something that is testable within our current l
evel of technology ans we will likely know whether LQG is correct once the LHC i
s fully operational. This would be the inflationary period of our own universe.
Coupled with the cyclic model, which allows for dark energy to occupy the univ
erse completely at its maximum extent, this takes care of the entropy problem (a
s dark energy is nothing more than ZPE that has infiltrated our universe from th
e bulk to balance out both sides.) This would create a double helix like struct
ure for our universe (like DNA/RNA)-- showing, once again, how the universe mimi
cs itself on various levels. Research is ongoing about what the prior universe
might have been like, and some suggest that its larger structures were very simi
lar to our own (because during each big bang, when the universe is the size of a
particle, quantum effects take over, and the universe which results, is just li
ke a huge particle, with its structures, the results of quantum processes-- incl
uding entanglement, superposition, teleportation, etc.-- and these might also be
the reason why we have "bridges" (black hole - worm hole pairs) between differe
nt universes-- as these are the larger scale version of bridges that exist at th
e quantum level and cause all the bizarre effects of nonlocality! Its interesti
ng that the quality of superposition (two particles at exactly the same location
at the same time) and entanglement (basically one particle at two or more diffe
rent locations at the same time), which seem like opposite properties, can both
be explained by the theories of higher dimensions-- for while it seems like the
same location-- there needs to be an extra dimension (hyperspace or the original
spatial dimension and/or imaginary time, the original temporal dimension of the
omniverse), which is not being included. Its like looking from above and seein
g a bird fly over a house; it looks as if the bird is superimposed on top of the
house, but that's only because we havent made an allowance for the third spatia
l dimension of depth. In the case of entanglement, tunneling and teleportation,
two objects may seem completely unconnected in the conventional dimensions, but
these are just shadows of their higher forms, which could be linked in the extr
a dimensions. Which fulfills Plato's vision from over two millenia ago! And th
ese linkages are facilitated by the presence of black hole - wormhole bridges of
various sizes, from the nanoscopic all the way through the supermassive. The e
xistence of gravity requires the presence of additional dimensions to not only e
xplain its source, but also the reason why its effects become diluted inside uni
verses (which are basically just islands of different dimensions floating in the
original dimensions of the bulk: the truest fulfillment of Immanuel Kant's visi
on of island universes two hundred years later!) and also why gravity's effects
grow much stronger on the nanoscopic scale, even though there is less mass overa
ll-- because, on the nanoscopic scale, the conventional dimensions disappear and
we are back to the original dimensions of the bulk: hyperspace and imaginary ti
me (which facilitates microscopic black hole - wormhole formation and is the fun
damental state of the omniverse.) This is where we get the 11 dimensions from;
the 3+1 dimensions of our own universe and its parallel timeverses as well as an
y other outside multiverses that have the same dimensions, forces and physical l
aws and constants but with a different amount of mass-energy (and thus a differe
nt length of oscillation) and different structures resulting from big bang quant
um fluctuations (call that layer 1b), the 3+1 complementary dimensions of Layer
2 multiverses with their own laws of physics and constants (think complementary
colors or quarks, with dark energy substituting for gluons, and likewise, increa
sing in strength as it expands-- until eventually, the rubber band "snaps" and i
t comes back, like the gluons and the strong nuclear force which confines quarks
inside subatomic particles-- maybe the larger scale version of that is what gua
rantees an oscillating universe), plus the fundamental original space and time d
imensions of the bulk (hyperspace and imaginary time) and the gravity dimension.
I put forth the idea that there are also four complementary forces to the four
forces in our universe (note that complementary doesnt mean "anti") and that th
ese universes with complementary dimensions or a mix of complementary and "norma
l" dimensions will also have complementary forces or a mix, codependent on each
other, as well as complementary force carriers (except for EM and gravity, which
are always the same.) And each universe's identical but opposite antiverse (mi
rrorverse) will have all complementary dimensions and forces, be composed predom
inantly of antimatter and the total mass-energy of the universe/antiverse pair w
ill always be roughly equal (roughly because this is also dependent on virtual p
article interactions with the outside omniverse and the ZPE interaction with the
bulk.) In these antiverses, to an observer from its counterpart, everything (i
ncluding time) would appear to be going backwards and photons would appear to be
the slowest particles, as everything else was apparently exceeding the speed of
light-- although none of this would actually be the case. The only thing they
would have in common would be light and its properties and its speed, which woul
d also form their boundary. The funny thing is, someone from an antiverse obser
ving its counterpart, would see exactly the same reversals! Dimensions and thei
r complementary counterparts emerging from their fundamental versions in the bul
k makes sense intuitively-- it preserves the dimensional "balance" (new conserva
tion law?) the same way pair production does. Same goes with forces and their c
omplementary counterparts. Dimensions from each 3+1 group can mix in another mu
ltiverse, but two complementary dimensions (or forces) cant exist in the same un
iverse (which will lead to ways of classifying multiverses based on their physic
al laws and constants which come from the combination of dimensions and compleme
ntary dimensions and resultant forces and complementary forces they have, as wel
l as total mass-energy content, the same way we do for stars and galaxies), much
the same way matter and antimatter cant coexist (for example, we can have lengt
h, width, complementary depth and complementary time but we cant have length, wi
dth, complementary width and time or length, width, time and complementary time
in the same universe-- dimensions [or forces] and their complementaries in the s
ame universe would cancel each other out; that universe would be unstable and co
llapse in on itself as soon as it was formed [and all its energy would be releas
ed and add to the ZPE of the bulk and omniverse as a whole-- the clumping of the
ZPE from the action of gravity, forming virtual particles in the bulk, which le
ads to the creation of more bubble universes and multiverses in the same way sta
rs and planets are formed [and virtual particles in our and other universes migh
t merely be nested universes, as they bounce from hyperverse to hyperverse {resu
lting from extremely high energy GRBs and cosmic rays, not only in the hypervers
e, but within the nested universes also, right on down the line, until they fina
lly reach their ground state and become stable in the bulk-- something we might
be doing also; as the paper above noted, being in a nested universe would unify
quantum mechanics and relativity}; the action of gravity on ZPE to create virtua
l particles is what created the extra dimensions, forces and the island universe
s in the first place, so they would just be returning back to their original sou
rce-- perhaps resulting in GRBs in adjacent multiverses to create more bridges a
nd nested universes or even a local increase in the CMB {the history of created
nested universes and multiverses being written in the CMB and the history of gr
ound state universes and multiverses being written in the ZPE of the bulk would
be fundamental aspects of the holographic principle-- as we have seen in some pa
rts of the universe!] because, as the dimensions and forces canceled each other
out, undiluted gravity would take over [this might even result in "dead end" bri
dges-- that is, black hole wormhole pairs that end in the bulk {because the bulk
overall has more energy than any universe within because of all the dimensions
and forces being unified there, thus the creation and cycling of a universe and
its bridges actually follow the entropy law as they balance the virtual particle
and ZPE content of the omniverse, all the while creating more universes!} inste
ad of inter or intrauniverse in adjacent universes-- travellers beware!]-- but w
e NEED multiple dimensions and forces to dilute gravity and keep it in check! B
lack hole - wormhole bridges between adjacent multiverses with one or more compl
ementary dimensions and forces between them might even facilitate the formation
of multiple bridges between them and might cause excessive GRBs inside both and
thus make life nonexistent or nearly so-- along with producing more nested unive
rses! Something to ponder when you consider which universes might be likely to
have life within. Antimatter is probably more prevalent in universes of complem
entary dimensions and forces also.) The intensity of gravity is tempered somewh
at by the fact that the relationship between density, mass and volume breaks dow
n at that level, as LQG and string theory have predicted and explained (the conv
ergence of both on the same solution is heartening when considering the likeliho
od of this solution being correct.) So, whether black hole worm hole bridges ar
e bundles of strings or loops (the more massive ones being more densely packed),
the overall solution is the same. Earlier, and in Origin, I had discussed how
subPlanck to Planck sized black hole - wormhole bridges might be embedded in th
e quantum foam (the virtual particle/energy/ZPE landscape of the omniverse.) Th
is is facilitated by the Uncertainty Principle, which indicates that as we probe
smaller and smaller distances and times, the peaks and valleys in the quantum f
oam landscape grow steeper and deeper and the virtual particles become more and
more energized and thus the ZPE grows in proportion within each universe on succ
essively smaller scales. What then happens is that, just as some have predicted
that the LHC will produce black holes, they are produced "naturally" all across
space-time on the microscopic scale, embedded in the quantum foam, as it is bom
barded by extremely high energy cosmic rays and gamma ray bursts (this is the re
ason why gravity increases on the nanoscopic scale-- the higher amounts of energ
y on the smaller scales and the formation of black hole wormhole bridges and thi
s would also explain the presence of dark matter, which sculpts the large scale
structure of our universe in collusion with dark energy and ZPE.) Except that t
here are many many more of them than the LHC could ever produce as the intensity
of these collisions is many orders of magnitude greater and far beyond our curr
ent level of technology (and for some time to come.) But this does give us the
blueprint for creating our own traversable black hole wormhole bridges with resu
ltant "effective" FTL travel ("effective" because it wouldnt really be going fas
ter than light in as much as going outside space-time in a warp bubble) and time
travel one day. And the smaller the space-time scale, the more massive the bri
dges are on both sides (and the more particles and energy they shuttle back and
forth, thus leading to that steeper and deeper quantum foam), but also the more
quickly they evaporate to more than make up for their increased mass and energy
transport-- until space-time itself breaks down and the linkages are established
between universes and between seemingly unconnected points in the same universe
and into the bulk! Cause and effect become the same thing! The extremely ener
getic photons colliding with virtual particles along their route result in hyper
spatial bridges (that is, black hole - wormhole pairs) between different points
in our universe and other universes also. This thus provides the vehicle for mo
re virtual particles and energy being shuttled back and forth intra and inter un
iverse while maintaining Conservation Laws while creating more nested universes,
more cosmic rays and GRB, more bridges and more nested universes. Yet another
feedback loop! The dead end bridges mentioned earlier might be how some of thes
e nested universes end up in the bulk and is also what maintains the ZPE balance
between each universe and the bulk (and the ZPE is the fuel to create more univ
erses.) The more massive virtual particles that become universes will have a mu
ch shorter lifespan (mimicking the lifespan of massive stars), because they will
implode under the force of their own gravitation, but will become fodder for th
e next generation of universes as their energy gets released into the bulk and t
he rest of the omniverse, resulting in more ZPE, GRBs, cosmic rays, hyperspatial
links, nested universes and etc. Thus we establish a feedback loop of highly e
nergetic photons hitting particles creating bridges causing more particles to wi
nk in and out which results in more interactions with more energized photons lea
ding to even more black hole - wormhole pairs. Yet another circular feature of
the omniverse! The mere creation of these bridges causes the destruction of spa
ce-time on the subplanck level (or the inability of it to exist in the first pla
ce), as the quantum foam becomes littered with nanoscopic black hole - wormhole
pairs distorting space beyond all recognition because of the density of the brid
ges at that level and multiple closed timelike curves within close proximity of
each other surrounding each bridge doing the same with time. As a matter of fac
t, what we perceive as space-time is merely the sum of all the interactions that
occur at that level (and the black holes and worm holes cancel each other out o
n the macroscopic level hence we dont feel the extreme gravity of the nanoscopic
level, or not nearly so, as we still have dark matter to deal with, which might
represent the imbalance between black holes and wormholes-- thus the steepness
and deepness of the quantum foam evens out at larger scales and makes space-time
appear smooth and continuous in accordance with Relativity-- keep in mind, quan
tum foam exists below the scale of the "quantized" structure of space-time on th
e planck level, so this is what would exist "between" the quanta of space-time o
n the subplanck scale), so it can be said more accurately that its our perceptio
ns that are distorted and that space-time and cause-effect dont actually exist,
thus allowing for FTL space travel and time travel! This is exactly why all tho
se nonlocal properties actually occur at the quantum level where space-time isnt
smooth or continuous and why we need so much more energy to do it on our macros
copic level! The alignment of the black hole - wormhole pairs depends on which
"side" the energetic photons collided with; that is, if it was in our universe,
then the black hole side will be on our side and the worm hole on the other side
and vice versa. In the case of intrauniverse bridges, they simply link two dif
ferent parts of the same universe and the black hole side will again be wherever
the collision occured. In the case of the bulk, its wherever an adjacent unive
rse/multiverse collapsed and/or big banged. What determines where the wormhole
will open up is the angle and intensity of the collision (lowest intensity dead
end bridges leading to the bulk, the final destination of a stable and mature un
iverse, next intensity interuniverse, higher intensity layer 1 timeverse, highes
t intensity layer 2 multiverse.) Thus universes which have an inordinate number
of GRB and cosmic radiation of high intensities will have a higher number of mi
croscopic black holes and will be stripped of their matter more quickly and gain
dark energy more quickly thus bouncing back more quickly and yet produce more n
ested universes within a given amount of time, while universes that are less act
ive have longer oscillatory periods (akin to more and less active galaxies-- yet
another way that the omniverse repeats on different scales.) The black hole - w
ormhole bridges only exist for a finite period of time before they slowly evapor
ate and release energy, but they fulfill their mission of shuttling particles an
d energy throughout the omniverse and keeping the balance intact and leading to
more bridge and universe formation. Not only that, but they also facilitate the
balance of ZPE between the bulk and the universes, leading to increasing amount
s of dark energy in proportion to the size of the universe and expansion. Which
means that the presence of ZPE in the quantum foam in a given universe leads to
even more ZPE-- like a chain reaction! Which eventually leads to the expansion
of the universe coming to a halt (as all the matter gets used up; the universe
reaches balance both with the bulk and within itself and all the black holes eva
porate and the universe actually becomes smooth and continuous with no connectio
ns to external multiverses or the bulk and the parallel timeverses all collapse
into the same universe-- similar to the collapse of the wave function-- and only
dark energy remains) and the universe comes back to point size empty-- only to
big bang and separate into satellite timeverses and re-esablish connections with
other multiverses and the bulk again as GRB and cosmic radiation interact with
matter all over again and create more nested universes (something we might be do
ing ourselves one day)! This is the ultimate of all feedback loops-- the oscill
ating omniverse! In the far far future, as the expansion nears its peak, the q
uantum foam landscape will start to become less and less steep as the amount of
dark energy increases in the universe and space-time actually becomes smoother a
s larger scale black hole wormhole pairs take over the transport of virtual part
icles and ZPE with time. Until, eventually, those too will evaporate. Its a go
od thing, for otherwise we would be doomed to a universe that got ripped apart--
granted it would be far far in the future! How the next oscillation proceeds d
epends upon the quantum fluctuations that happen upon that universe just prior t
o and during the next big bang-- which might be triggered by something as simple
as a virtual particle interaction with an adjoining universe or a brane on bran
e collision. We might even be seeing signs of big bangs in other universes thro
ugh the action of extremely high intensity gamma ray bursts (GRBs) and cosmic ra
ys which, while producing more hyperspatial links between and through universes,
can also be a sign of the creation of a new universe itself!<br /><br />Does th
is mean that the older universe was an exact duplicate? No. The larger scale st
ructures, such as superclusters and voids were likely similar, but the galaxies,
star clusters, planets, etc born from them were probably different, as there is
an inherent randomness involved with quantum processes which would have larger
scale results as the universe evolved. As I work on this paper, Im also writing
another essay; this one concerns the origin of consciousness. The connections
between consciousness, higher dimensions, and quantum mechanics has always fasci
nated me (some of the latest theories of quantum consciousness invoke the idea t
hat the deeper parts of consciousness come from the original dimension, in the b
ulk, which is why confirmed cases of ESP might be analogous to quantum entanglem
ent, superposition or teleportation, since the quantum field acting through the
original dimension leads to nonlocality-- where classical space-time ceases to e
xist on the subPlanck level-- which harks back to the philosophy of the timeless
ness of the "soul"-- and Carl Jung's collective consciousness, which might be ou
tlined by ZPE along with entanglement)-- because here you have not only the insi
ght of modern physics, but also that of ancient philosophy. Its as if the human
mind already understood this on some basic instinctual level, because we are a
part of it, and we just need the mathematics of it to be ironed out and be at a
level of technology where we can actually come up with the proof to back up our
theories. In this way, we must pay tribute to Plato who, without anything resem
bling the kind of technology or math we have today, came up with the idea of hig
her planes of reality and how our senses could only perceive of a shadow of what
existence really is ("The Allegory of the Cave")-- he even predicted how resist
ant that people would be at first to accept this idea, until they were confronte
d with irrefutable proof. <br /><br />To reiterate my model of dimensions:<br /
><br />Original space (hyperspace) + Original time (imaginary time) + Gravity --
-&gt; RGB spatial dimensions (l,w,h) written on a fabric of black (t) plus the
CMY complementary spatial dimensions (l',w',h') written on a fabric of white (t'
)<br /><br /><br /><br />R=RED G= GREEN B= BLUE C=CYAN M= MAGENTA Y= YELLOW. I
m using black for time because RGB are the additive primary colors (that is, on
a background of black) while CMY are the subtractive primary colors (on a backgr
ound of white.)<br /><br />€</div><div><br /><br /><br /></div></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532637379'>1
:59 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532637379' i
d='cmtCount_532637379'>2&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_532637379'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount7'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl07_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(532637379);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_532637379" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 532637379);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 532637379);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 532637379);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5326373
79);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 532637379);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 532637379);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 532637379);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53263737
9);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 532637379);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 532637379);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 532637379);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 532637379);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 532637379);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 532637379);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 532637379);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 532637379);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
32637379);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 532637379);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 532637379);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 532637379);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53263737
9);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 532637379);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 532637379);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 532637379);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 532637379
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 532637379);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 532637379);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 532637379);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53263737
9);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 532637379);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 532637379);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 532637379);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 532637379
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 532637379);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 532637379);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 532637379);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 532637379);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 532637379);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 532637379);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 532637379);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 532637379);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=532637379'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=532637379'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
April 8, 2010 - Thursday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_532422738">Proof on the event horizon for ORIGIN !</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_532422738" class="blogContent"><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFo
dHRwOi8vd3d3LnBoeXNvcmcuY29tL25ld3MxODk3OTI4MzkuaHRtbA==">http://www.physorg.com
/news189792839.html</a></div><div><br /></div><div>Our universe at home within a
larger universe? So suggests wormhole research<br /><br />Enlarge<br />April 6,
2010 <br />Enlarge<br /><br />Einstein-Rosen bridges like the one visualized ab
ove have never been observed in nature, but they provide theoretical physicists
and cosmologists with solutions in general relativity by combining models of bla
ck holes and white holes.<br /><br />(<a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwO
i8vUGh5c09yZy5jb20=">PhysOrg.com</a>) -- Could our universe be located within th
e interior of a wormhole which itself is part of a black hole that lies within a
much larger universe? <br /><br /><br /><br />Such a scenario in which the univ
erse is born from inside a wormhole (also called an Einstein-Rosen Bridge) is su
ggested in a paper from Indiana University theoretical physicist Nikodem Poplaws
ki in Physics Letters B. The final version of the paper was available online Mar
ch 29 and will be published in the print edition April 12.<br /><br />Poplawski
takes advantage of the Euclidean-based coordinate system called isotropic coordi
nates to describe the gravitational field of a black hole and to model the radia
l geodesic motion of a massive particle into a black hole.<br /><br />In studyin
g the radial motion through the event horizon (a black hole's boundary) of two d
ifferent types of black holes -- Schwarzschild and Einstein-Rosen, both of which
are mathematically legitimate solutions of general relativity -- Poplawski admi
ts that only experiment or observation can reveal the motion of a particle falli
ng into an actual black hole. But he also notes that since observers can only se
e the outside of the black hole, the interior cannot be observed unless an obser
ver enters or resides within.<br /><br />"This condition would be satisfied if o
ur universe were the interior of a black hole existing in a bigger universe," he
said. "Because Einstein's general theory of relativity does not choose a time o
rientation, if a black hole can form from the gravitational collapse of matter t
hrough an event horizon in the future then the reverse process is also possible.
Such a process would describe an exploding white hole: matter emerging from an
event horizon in the past, like the expanding universe."<br /><br />A white hole
is connected to a black hole by an Einstein-Rosen bridge (wormhole) and is hypo
thetically the time reversal of a black hole. Poplawski's paper suggests that al
l astrophysical black holes, not just Schwarzschild and Einstein-Rosen black hol
es, may have Einstein-Rosen bridges, each with a new universe inside that formed
simultaneously with the black hole.<br /><br />"From that it follows that our u
niverse could have itself formed from inside a black hole existing inside anothe
r universe," he said.<br /><br />By continuing to study the gravitational collap
se of a sphere of dust in isotropic coordinates, and by applying the current res
earch to other types of black holes, views where the universe is born from the i
nterior of an Einstein-Rosen black hole could avoid problems seen by scientists
with the Big Bang theory and the black hole information loss problem which claim
s all information about matter is lost as it goes over the event horizon (in tur
n defying the laws of quantum physics).<br /><br />This model in isotropic coord
inates of the universe as a black hole could explain the origin of cosmic inflat
ion, Poplawski theorizes.<br /><br />Poplawski is a research associate in the IU
Department of Physics. He holds an M.S. and a Ph.D. in physics from Indiana Uni
versity and a M.S. in astronomy from the University of Warsaw, Poland.<br /><br
/>More information: "Radial motion into an Einstein-Rosen bridge," Physics Lette
rs B, by Nikodem J. Poplawski. (Volume 687, Issues 2-3, 12 April 2010, Pages 110
-113.<br /><a><img width="325" src="http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/
143/l_263b11afafad464095ca27bc77f40c9f.jpg" /></a> <br /><br /><br /></div></div
>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532422738'>6
:56 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532422738' i
d='cmtCount_532422738'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_532422738'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount8'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl08_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(532422738);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_532422738" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 532422738);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 532422738);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 532422738);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5324227
38);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 532422738);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 532422738);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 532422738);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53242273
8);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 532422738);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 532422738);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 532422738);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 532422738);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 532422738);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 532422738);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 532422738);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 532422738);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
32422738);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 532422738);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 532422738);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 532422738);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53242273
8);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 532422738);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 532422738);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 532422738);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 532422738
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 532422738);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 532422738);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 532422738);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53242273
8);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 532422738);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 532422738);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 532422738);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 532422738
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 532422738);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 532422738);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 532422738);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 532422738);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 532422738);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 532422738);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 532422738);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 532422738);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=532422738'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=532422738'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
March 31, 2010 - Wednesday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_532006629">Endings</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_532006629" class="blogContent">Cool. I am going to be home recovering fro
m having the shrapnel removed from my lower back for the next few days so I will
read this. I will convert it to a PDF and post it on my site in the research by
others section, and post a separate commentary after I fully digest it. I think
this is great.<br /><br /> <br /><br />"Endings"<br /><br />An initial commenta
ry to go with Alex Reynolds' "Origin"<br /><br />By David Rountree<br /><br />We
ll, Einstein believed in the Big Crunch. In other words, if there is enough matt
er in the Universe eventually gravitational forces will stop its expansion. At t
he point of maximum expansion, gravity will cause the universe to reverse its di
rection and it will begin to collapse under its own weight. This phase of the Un
iverse's life is known as the "Big Crunch". <br /><br />Eventually, according to
Einstein, all of the matter in the Universe will collapse into a super dense st
ate and possibly a massive black hole. Some theorize that the Universe could col
lapse into the same state that it began as and then blow up in another Big Bang.
In this way the Universe would last forever but would continually go through th
ese phases of expansion and contraction, Big Bang and Big Crunch and so on... <b
r /><br />Einstein believed in a "Closed" universe<br /><br />I do not.<br /><br
/>Mathematically, if Ω &gt; 1, then the geometry of space is closed like the surf
ace of a sphere. The sum of the angles of a triangle exceeds 180 degrees and the
re are no parallel lines, therefore all lines eventually meet. The geometry of t
he universe is, at least on a very large scale, elliptic.<br /><br />In a closed
universe lacking the repulsive effect of dark energy, gravity will theoreticall
y halt the expansion of the universe, after which it starts to contract until al
l matter in the universe collapses to a point, a final singularity termed the "B
ig Crunch," by analogy with Big Bang. However, if the universe has a large amoun
t of dark energy (as suggested by recent findings), then the expansion of the un
iverse can continue forever - even if Ω &gt; 1.<br /><br />This is why I don't buy
into it. The universe DOES have a large amount of Dark energy. Gravity as a fo
rce is far too weak to pull all the mass back in, much less stop the acceleratin
g. Remember, we are not moving forward at the same terminal velocity, we have ye
t to reach terminal velocity. We are still accelerating away from the big bang e
vent horizon.<br /><br /> <br /><br />But, if the universe does not contain enou
gh matter to stop its expansion it will continue to expand forever. <br /><br />
Using the currently understood laws of physics it is possible to project into th
e future what the Universe may look like in very distant eras. Two astrophysicis
ts at the University of Michigan have outlined the future history of the Univers
e. <br /><br /> <br /><br />These guys have divided the future into Eras. The cu
rrent Era is known as the Stelliferous or Star-Filled era. The state of the Univ
erse is filled with stars and galaxies and planets. This era ends when all the s
tars have exhausted their fuel and have died leaving behind only remnants of the
ir brilliance. <br /><br /> <br /><br />The next era is known as the Degenerate
era. The universe is composed of dead planets, brown dwarfs, white dwarfs, neutr
on stars, black holes, and some theoretical forms of dark matter. This era ends
with the disintegration of all protons, which compose the nuclei of all atoms. <
br /><br /> <br /><br />Then the universe enters the Black Hole era. Black holes
will be the only gravitationally important objects remaining in the universe. B
lack holes do not last forever. They will eventually evaporate, radiating away i
nto nothingness. <br /><br /> <br /><br />After that all that will remain is rad
iation and particles which have an infinite lifetime such as electrons, positron
s, and neutrinos. From this point on it is impossible to fathom what will happen
as we have reached the limits of our knowledge. <br /><br /> <br /><br />In oth
er words, they propose a scenario called an "Open" universe.<br /><br /> <br /><
br />If Ω&lt;1, the geometry of space is open, or negatively curved like the surfa
ce of a saddle. The angles of a triangle sum to less than 180 degrees, and lines
that do not meet are never equidistant; they have a point of least distance and
otherwise grow apart. The geometry of such a universe is hyperbolic.<br /><br /
> <br /><br />But even in the absence of dark energy, a negatively curved univer
se expands forever, with gravity having little effect in slowing the rate of exp
ansion. With dark energy, the expansion not only continues but accelerates, whic
h seems to be our current condition after some 13.6 billion years of existence.
The ultimate fate of an open universe as proposed is either universal heat death
, the "Big Freeze", or the "Big Rip," in which the dark energy inspired accelera
tion eventually becomes so strong that it completely overwhelms the effects of t
he gravitational, electromagnetic and weak binding forces. I have issues with th
is scenario as well.<br /><br /> <br /><br />On the other hand, a negative cosmo
logical constant, which would correspond to a negative energy density and positi
ve pressure, would cause even an open universe to recollapse to a big crunch. Th
is has been ruled out by recent observations. But there are aspects of all of th
is that remain problematic.<br /><br /> <br /><br />Another theory is the Flat u
niverse.<br /><br /> <br /><br />If the average density of the universe equals t
he critical density so that Ω=1, then the geometry of the universe is flat: as in
Euclidean geometry, the sum of the angles of a triangle is 180 degrees and paral
lel lines continuously maintain the same distance.<br /><br /> <br /><br />Absen
t of dark energy, a flat universe expands forever but at a continually decelerat
ing rate, with expansion asymptotically approaching a fixed rate. With dark ener
gy, the expansion rate of the universe initially slows down, due to the effect o
f gravity, but eventually increases. The ultimate fate of the universe is the sa
me as an open universe. I don't buy into this either, as current observations ca
st doubt on this.<br /><br /> <br /><br />So what is the nature of the END of th
e universe?<br /><br /> <br /><br />There are actually many theories about the e
nd of universe, and that fate will be determined by the density of the universe.
The preponderance of evidence to date, based on measurements of the rate of exp
ansion and the mass density, favors a universe that will continue to expand inde
finitely, resulting in the "big freeze" scenario.<br /><br /> <br /><br />The Bi
g Freeze or Heat death<br /><br />The Big Freeze is a scenario under which conti
nued expansion results in a universe that asymptotically approaches absolute zer
o temperature. It could, in the absence of dark energy, occur only under a flat
or hyperbolic geometry. With a positive cosmological constant, it could also occ
ur in a closed universe. This scenario is currently the most commonly accepted t
heory within the scientific community. A related scenario is Heat death, which s
tates that the universe goes to a state of maximum entropy in which everything i
s evenly distributed, and there are no gradients - which are needed to sustain i
nformation processing, one form of which is life. The Heat Death scenario is com
patible with any of the three spatial models, but requires that the universe rea
ch an eventual temperature minimum. While this is getting a lot of juice now amo
ng astrophysicists, I have issues with it as well.<br /><br /> <br /><br />The B
ig Rip: Finite Lifespan<br /><br />In the special case of phantom dark energy, w
hich has even more negative pressure than a simple cosmological constant, the de
nsity of dark energy increases with time, causing the rate of acceleration to in
crease, leading to a steady increase in the Hubble constant. As a result, all ma
terial objects in the universe, starting with galaxies and eventually (in a fini
te time) all forms, no matter how small, will disintegrate into unbound elementa
ry particles and radiation, ripped apart by the phantom energy force and shootin
g apart from each other. The end state of the universe is a singularity, as the
dark energy density and expansion rate becomes infinite. While on the surface th
is makes sense, it too is problematic.<br /><br /> <br /><br />The Big Crunch<br
/><br />The Big Crunch theory is a symmetric view of the ultimate fate of the u
niverse. Just as the Big Bang started a cosmological expansion, this theory post
ulates that the average density of the universe is enough to stop its expansion
and begin contracting. The end result is unknown; a simple extrapolation would h
ave all the matter and space-time in the universe collapse into a dimensionless
singularity, but at these scales unknown quantum effects need to be considered s
uch as Quantum Gravity. <br /><br /> <br /><br />This scenario allows the Big Ba
ng to have been immediately preceded by the Big Crunch of a preceding universe.
If this occurs repeatedly, we have an oscillatory universe. The universe could t
hen consist of an infinite sequence of finite universes, each finite universe en
ding with a Big Crunch that is also the Big Bang of the next universe. Theoretic
ally, the oscillating universe could not be reconciled with the second law of th
ermodynamics: entropy would build up from oscillation to oscillation and cause h
eat death. Other measurements suggested the universe is not closed. These argume
nts caused cosmologists to abandon the oscillating universe model. A somewhat si
milar idea is embraced by the cyclic model, but this idea evades heat death, bec
ause of an expansion of the branes that dilutes entropy accumulated in the previ
ous cycle. While I don't believe the Universe is oscillating, I believe the mult
iverse does. The multiverse oscilates and the universes are small subcarriers fl
oating on the quantum wave, like the static surfboard.<br /><br /> <br /><br />B
ig Bounce<br /><br />The Big Bounce is a theorized scientific model related to t
he beginning of the known Universe. It derives from the oscillatory universe or
cyclic repetition interpretation of the Big Bang where the first cosmological ev
ent was the result of the collapse of a previous universe.<br /><br /> <br /><br
/>According to one version of the Big Bang theory of cosmology, in the beginnin
g the universe had infinite density. Such a description seems to be at odds with
everything else in physics, and especially quantum mechanics and its uncertaint
y principle. It is not surprising, therefore, that quantum mechanics has given r
ise to an alternative version of the Big Bang theory. Also, if the universe is c
losed, this theory would predict that once this universe collapses it will spawn
another universe in an event similar to the Big Bang after a universal singular
ity is reached or a repulsive quantum force causes re-expansion. While this has
merit, it is still incomplete.<br /><br /> <br /><br />The False vacuum<br /><br
/>If the vacuum is not in its lowest energy state (a false vacuum), it could tu
nnel into a lower energy state. This is called the vacuum metastability event. T
his has the potential to fundamentally alter our universe; in more audacious sce
narios even the various physical constants could have different values, severely
affecting the foundations of matter, energy, and spacetime. It is also possible
that all structures will be destroyed instantaneously, without any forewarning.
I have issues with this as well.<br /><br /> <br /><br />Cosmic uncertainty<br
/><br />Each possibility described so far is based on a very simple form for the
dark energy equation of state. But as the name is meant to imply, we know almos
t nothing of the real physics of the dark energy. If the theory of inflation is
true, the universe went through an episode dominated by a different form of dark
energy in the first moments of the big bang; but inflation ended, indicating an
equation of state much more complicated than those assumed so far for present-d
ay dark energy. It is possible that the dark energy equation of state could chan
ge again resulting in an event that would have consequences which are extremely
difficult to parametrize or predict. It is also possible the universe may never
have an end and continue in its present state forever.<br /><br /> <br /><br />C
hoosing among these rival scenarios is done by 'weighing' the universe, for exam
ple, measuring the relative contributions of matter, radiation, dark matter and
dark energy to the critical density. More concretely, competing scenarios are ev
aluated against data on galaxy clustering and distant supernovae, and on the ani
sotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background.<br /><br /> <br /><br />So what do
I believe?<br /><br /> <br /><br />I believe in the Multiverse. <br /><br /> <b
r /><br />I believe that once the fuse was lit, there is no complete end. <br />
<br />My multiverse hypothesis states that our universe is merely one Big Bang a
mong an infinite number of simultaneously expanding Big Bangs that are spread ou
t over endless distances. Each universe may be either matter or antimatter, with
an equal number in existence at any given time. As the universes each expand aw
ay from their individual event horizons they collide and matter and antimatter a
nnihilate, releasing energy. Heat death of a finite universe would be predicted
as entropy increases; however, the infinite size of the multiverse and its oscil
lation coupled with the infinite number of universes could mean that new ones wo
uld be formed as old ones were annihilated.<br /><br /> <br /><br />Think of it
as a chain reaction multiverse, much like the finale at a fireworks display wit
h each explosion being symbolic of a Big Bang. It begins in one neighborhood and
is followed by fireworks displays in surrounding neighborhoods and then in neig
hborhoods further out. The chain reaction of Big Bangs would continue to expand
as Big Bang fuel is consumed. If the multiverse is open and the fuel is infinite
then the chain reaction would expand forever. Of course, it is not known what t
he "fuel" is, (I believe it is the Zero Point Energy Field) but it is logical to
assume that matter and energy are the product of a transformation from a real r
eactant, possibly the Higgs boson. While I tend to think they won't discover the
Higgs Boson, there will be a settlement on something called the Higgs Boson Eff
ect if the Higgs Boson is not discovered.<br /><br /> <br /><br />By my reckonin
g, the multiverse as a whole will never end completely. But this is just a part
of the equation. We have to add in the Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mec
hanics. As such, each time a quantum event happens that causes the universe to d
ecay from a false vacuum to a true vacuum state, the universe splits into severa
l new worlds. In some of the new worlds the universe decays; in some others the
universe continues as before. I believe that both of these theories are part of
the same theory. One is entangled with the other creating many reactions relatin
g to the whole. <br /><br /> <br /><br />Recent work in inflationary cosmology,
string theory, and quantum mechanics has moved the discussion of the ultimate fa
te of the universe in directions distinct from the scenarios set out by some of
the other theories. Theoretical work by Eric Chaisson and David Layzer suggest t
hat an expanding spacetime gives rise to an increasing "entropy gap", casting fu
rther doubt on the heat death hypothesis. Invoking Ilya Prigogine's work on far-
from-equilibrium thermodynamics, their analysis suggests that this entropy gap m
ay contribute to information, and hence to the formation of structure. Hence the
Information Theory may be a part of the TOE, or Theory of Everything. Add to th
is aspects of the Holographic principle. The holographic principle is a property
of quantum gravity and string theories which states that the description of a v
olume of space can be thought of as encoded on a boundary to the region, prefera
bly a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon. First proposed by Gerard
't Hooft, it was given a precise string-theory interpretation by Leonard Susski
nd.<br /><br /> <br /><br />In a larger and more speculative sense, the theory s
uggests that the entire universe can be seen as a two-dimensional information st
ructure "painted" on the cosmological horizon, such that the three dimensions we
observe are only an effective description at macroscopic scales and at low ener
gies. Cosmological holography has not been made mathematically precise, partly b
ecause the cosmological horizon has a finite area and grows with time.<br /><br
/> <br /><br />The holographic principle was inspired by black hole thermodynami
cs, which implies that the maximal entropy in any region scales with the radius
squared, and not cubed as might be expected. In the case of a black hole, the in
sight was that the description of all the objects which have fallen in can be en
tirely contained in surface fluctuations of the event horizon. The holographic p
rinciple resolves the black hole information paradox within the framework of str
ing theory. All of these play a part in the grand scheme of the Multiverse.<br /
><br /> <br /><br />Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Andrei Linde, Alan Guth, Ted H
arrison, and Ernest Sternglass argued that inflationary cosmology strongly sugge
sts the presence of a Multiverse, (Amen!) and that it would be practical even wi
th today's knowledge for intelligent beings to generate and transmit de novo inf
ormation into a distinct universe. Alan Guth has speculated that a civilization
at the top of the Kardashev scale might create fine-tuned universes in a continu
ation of the evolutionary drive to exist, grow, and multiply. This has been furt
her developed by the Selfish Biocosm Hypothesis, and by the proposal that the ex
istence of the fundamental physical constants may be subject to a Darwinian evol
ution of Universes. Moreover, recent theoretical work on the unresolved quantum
gravity problem and the Holographic Principle suggests that traditional physical
quantities may possibly themselves be describable in terms of exchanges of info
rmation, which in turn raises questions about the applicability of older cosmolo
gical models.<br /><br /></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532006629'>1
0:59 PM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=532006629' i
d='cmtCount_532006629'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_532006629'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount9'>
0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl09_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(532006629);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_532006629" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 532006629);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 532006629);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 532006629);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5320066
29);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 532006629);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 532006629);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 532006629);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53200662
9);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 532006629);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 532006629);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 532006629);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 532006629);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 532006629);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 532006629);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 532006629);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 532006629);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
32006629);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 532006629);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 532006629);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 532006629);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53200662
9);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 532006629);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 532006629);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 532006629);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 532006629
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 532006629);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 532006629);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 532006629);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53200662
9);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 532006629);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 532006629);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 532006629);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 532006629
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 532006629);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 532006629);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 532006629);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 532006629);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 532006629);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 532006629);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 532006629);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 532006629);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=532006629'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=532006629'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
March 23, 2010 - Tuesday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_531527230">Origin</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_531527230" class="blogContent">With the recent computer models pointing t
o an oscillating universe as the most likely scenario, Im wondering if there are
multiple parallel universes that oscillate at the same time. Let's say that th
ey all big bang at the same time-- so imagine a spindle-like structure, where ti
me lines all converge on the big bang and diverge after each big bang. Maybe ev
ery time we have a big bang we go into a different time line and another paralle
l universe goes into our time line to replace it. So basically all the possibil
ities exist at the same time and we just get shuffled around after each big bang
. Why do these universes converge on the same big bang? Because they all share
the same laws of physics and they're quantumly entangled. This what I call "La
yer 1"-- the layer of alternate time line universes-- universes which all share
the same laws of physics-- so their large scale structure is the same-- but whic
h can differ in minor details (like the time lines of people, for example.) Thi
s is what I would call "the local multiverse" (borrowing the name from our own l
ocal cluster of galaxies, which then form part of the Virgo supercluster, connec
ted to each other through thin, curiously cosmic string-like filaments [hint, hi
nt], but which are separated from other superclusters by large voids-- which mig
ht be how what I call the omnivese is also arranged on the large scale.) The ev
idence for these as well as cosmic strings may have been found in the recently d
iscovered "cold spot" in the Cosmic Background Radiation (keep reading.)<br /><b
r />This doesnt exclude the possibility of other multiverses with their own phys
ical laws and constants and perhaps some consisting entirely or mainly of antima
tter (what I call Layer 2 of the omniverse, which consists of other multiverses,
like our own, but with different laws of physics and thus not quantumly entangl
ed with our own but perhaps with the satellite universes of their own multiverse
), or even the idea of child-universes, branching and finally pinching off the m
ain one, and connected to each other through blackhole-wormhole pairs (the entir
e multi-multiverse or the OMNIVERSE might be connected in this way) with each of
these possessing different physical laws, although I do feel that as the univer
ses expand and then finally contract, the connections get severed and each unive
rse goes its own way-- perhaps to create even more child-universes to make up fo
r the connections that have been lost. Im thinking this happens through the act
of matter being swallowed by black holes; instead of disappearing forever-- it
emerges on the "other side" in a new child-universe. It may or may not keep its
original constituency, depending on whether or not the physical laws and consta
nts in the child-universe are the same as the ones in the parent universe (if th
ey are the same, the new child-universe will become quantumly entangled with the
parent-universe and big bang at the same time-- this would be how a multiverse
builds up its array of satellite universes; if not, then the child-universe will
go its own way and likely establish its own multiverse but remain part of the s
ame supercluster as the parent multiverse but not the same "local" cluster.) Al
so, the larger the black hole, the more matter it can swallow, and thus the larg
er the child universe on the other side. This would also be a function of the b
lack hole's age-- the older the black hole, the larger the child universe on the
other side. As far as connections eventually being severed, this could be link
ed to the black hole evaporation process, first described by Stephen Hawkings.
<br /><br />As a matter of fact, if one asks the question, "What sparks a big ba
ng?" -- one of the stimuli that lead to it could be the collision of two branes,
one expanding rapidly as the result of an inflationary period of expansion just
after its own big bang-- leading to a chain reaction causing other big bangs in
its vicinity. Think of it as a row of dominoes, one falls and others follow.
These universes can be thought of as black holes in their own right, as the edge
of the universe would be an event horizon, from which not even light can escape
. As a matter of fact, this goes along well with my idea that child universes w
ere born at the other end of blackhole-wormhole pairs--matter got sucked into a
black hole in another universe, passed into the wormhole, accumulated until ther
e was enough of it to make a singularity, and then some trigger-- like a brane-o
n-brane collision (caused by ZPE induced action in the bulk-- similar to what it
does in our space-time as dark energy)-- brought about a big bang. In this cas
e, we could have formed inside a wormhole, but the resulting universe would actu
ally be a black hole. The blackhole would be a singularity on the outside but n
ot the inside-- since different laws of physics apply on the outside. (This coul
d also be the case with black holes within our own universe and would show how a
nd why singularities form-- a black hole event horizon is simply a border betwee
n different laws of physics and the reason that it's a singularity is because th
e laws of physics are different on the outside vs the inside. In the case of "l
ocal" black holes we're on the outside trying to look in and in the case of our
own universe we are on the inside trying to look out! This would take care of t
he "first" big bang in an oscillatory cycle-- but how to keep them going? Well,
all those universes in layer 1-- which are "reflections" of the same universe (
much like mirrors in a funhouse all represent reflections of the same thing)-- j
ust with alternate timelines-- perhaps the expansion and then contraction of the
se alternate timelines of the same physical universe is what keeps the oscillato
ry nature of the big bang going! What keeps the universe from suffering an entr
opy related heat death during its expansion phase? Curiously enough, the same t
hing which stimulates the massive expansion-- dark energy (that is, ZPE triggere
d action on space-time.) Just as the universe is about to be ripped apart, a tu
rnaround occurs and only one causal patch is retained as our universe. This pat
ch is completely devoid of all matter-- including no particles-- and only contai
ns dark energy-- and its entropy thereby vanishes. The process of contraction o
f this much smaller universe takes place adiabatically with constantly vanishing
entropy and with no matter including no black holes (which pinched off and disi
ntegrated before the turnaround.) In effect, the universe "comes back empty"--
which avoids the problems of excessive structure formation, massive black holes
etc.-- all of which would have produced a premature bounce back to avoid violati
ng the second law of thermodynamics. Coming back empty during its contracting p
hase leaves the universe to freely oscillate an infinite number of times!<br /><
br />Im envisioning four layers to reality from our point of view (or hierarchie
s of higher dimensions, if you will).... the first layer includes our universe a
nd all that lies within and includes all the parallel universes that have identi
cal laws of physics and constants to our own (and that converge and diverge with
our universe at each big bang), the second layer would include all the child un
iverses and all the multiverses with their own laws of physics and constants and
their own parallel universes, the third layer would be the gravity brane from w
hich gravity emanates and the fourth layer would be "the bulk" or what fills the
void between the other layers. The four layer hierarchy seems particularly att
ractive to me (especially since the Universe seems to love grouping everything
in fours-- including the fundamental forces and the number of dimensions in our
own universe.) The gravity brane underlies everything, and this would be from
where gravity originates and is the glue that holds everything together, as well
as being the reason space-time curves and dips around objects of mass, as the g
ravity brane pulls mass "downward" (see my post "What lies beneathe Space-Time."
) This model also explains dark matter and dark energy (see Quintom Scenario) a
s just being manifestations of the gravity brane and ZPE respectively, as they i
nteract with our universe, whether it be through blackhole-wormhole pairs, WIMPs
(weakly interacting massive particles) or by some other means.<br /><br />The w
ay to integrate this into M-theory's 11 dimensions is to consider the first two
planes of reality having access to a total of 8 dimensions (6 spatial dimensions
and 2 temporal ones) with the third plane being the single dimensional gravity
brane and "the bulk" consisting of two dimensions-- one spatial dimension and on
e temporal ("imaginary time") dimension. This gives us a total of 8 spatial dim
ensions and 3 temporal ones (11 total dimensions) that make up the whole of the
omniverse. The second time dimension is very useful, since it explains the arro
w of time and allows FTL as well as time travel, but two temporal dimensions can
not exist in the same universe (as they would cancel each other out-- much like
matter-antimatter interactions), however FTL and time travel become accessible t
hrough blackhole-wormhole pairs, which bridge the gaps between the different lay
ers and through the bulk. Recent computational evidence seems to indicate that
universes with 4 dimensions are favored over other combinations, and my omnivers
e would allow for that-- as the first layer would have the 3 regular spatial dim
ensions plus regular time, and the second layer can have a maximum of 3 distinct
spatial dimensions plus 1 distinct temporal one (for a total of [3+1] + [3+1] o
r the 6 spatial + 2 temporal dimensions I mentioned earlier.) The bulk consists
of 1 spatial dimension and 1 dimension of imaginary time-- imaginary time being
a concept introduced by Stephen Hawkings to help iron out the difficulties intr
oduced by having a big bang singularity. Having imaginary time helps to answer
the question "What happened before the Big Bang(s)?"-- because imaginary time e
xisted before any of the big bangs and extends the timeline to before the creati
on of the universe. The gravity brane consists of only one dimension and this,
perhaps, is what makes gravity so intense there-- the fact that all of its power
is concentrated in a single dimension-- and also what makes it so diluted in ou
r 4 dimensional universe (it isnt just a matter of distance but also of concentr
ation.) Time travel and FTL would both be possible through the bulk's one spat
ial dimension and imaginary time-- as a matter of fact, this is exactly what the
universe did during its inflationary period when it expanded at many times the
speed of light through the bulk (but to do it now we have to find a conduit into
and out of the bulk-- perhaps that's what blackhole-wormhole pairs do, linking
different universes as well as different points in our own universe via a bridge
through the bulk-- and the reason why gravity is so strong in and near black ho
les is because they provide that direct link between our universe, the bulk and
the gravity brane which lies beyond.) What creates the attractive force betwee
n the gravity brane and the universe(s)? We can find that answer within the wor
ld of D-branes and M-theory. All elementary particles are thought to be vibrati
onal states of quantum strings and D-branes are extended objects upon which open
strings can end. D-branes are classified by their dimension.... for example a
D0-brane is a single point, a D1-brane is a line (or string), a D2-brane is a pl
ane, etc-- all the way up to D9-brane in M-theory. (Since every brane sweeps ou
t a [p+1]-dimensional world volume as it propagates through spacetime, there is
always one less than the maximum number of dimensions and its refered to as the
P-Brane in M-theory.) There are also D(-1)-branes which are localized in both s
pace and time, and called instantonic branes. With the development of M-theory,
an extra dimension appeared and the fundamental string of string theory became
a 2-dimensional membrane called an M1-brane (or supermembrane). This is what I
refer to as "the bulk." What are D-branes made of? Large collections of tachyo
ns (particles that travel faster than light), coherent in a way that reminds us
of photons in a laser beam. Tachyonic fields indeed arise in many versions of s
tring theory. In general, string theory states that what we see as "particles"—ele
ctrons, photons, gravitons and so forth—are actually different vibrational states
of the same underlying string. The mass of the particle can be deduced from the
vibrations which the string exhibits; roughly speaking, the mass depends upon th
e "note" which the string sounds. Tachyons frequently appear in the spectrum of
permissible string states, in the sense that some states have negative mass-squa
red, and therefore imaginary mass. If the tachyon appears as a vibrational mode
of an open string, this signals an instability of the underlying D-brane system
to which the string is attached. The system will then decay to a state of close
d strings and/or stable D-branes. If the tachyon is a closed string vibrational
mode, this indicates an instability in spacetime itself. Generally, it is not kn
own what this system will decay to. However, if the closed string tachyon is loc
alized around a spacetime singularity the endpoint of the decay process will oft
en have the singularity resolved. The tachyons carried by open strings attached
to D-branes in string theory reflect the instability of the D-branes with respe
ct to their complete annihilation. The total energy carried by these tachyons ha
s been calculated in string field theory; it agrees with the total energy of the
D-branes, and all other tests have confirmed this. Material objects, made of o
pen strings, are bound to the D-brane, and cannot move "at right angles to reali
ty" to explore the Universe outside the brane. The force of gravity is not due
to open strings; the gravitons which carry gravitational forces are vibrational
states of closed strings. Because closed strings do not have to be attached to D
-branes, gravitational effects could depend upon the extra dimensions at right a
ngles to the brane. This would be how the gravity brane exerts its influence up
on our universe, as well as others. In the same manner, this is how connections
can be established between different universes/multiverses (and perhaps this is
what blackhole/wormhole pairs really are as they bridge the gap across the bulk
.) Now let's say we have two universes, identified as brane 1 and brane 2. We
can easily imagine strings stretching from brane 1 to brane 2 or vice versa. (I
n most theories, strings are oriented objects: each one carries an "arrow" defin
ing a direction along its length.) The open strings permissible in this situatio
n then fall into two categories, or "sectors": those originating on brane 1 and
terminating on brane 2, and those originating on brane 2 and terminating on bran
e 1. In addition, a string may begin and end on the same brane. A string has
a minimum length: it cannot be shorter than the separation between the branes. A
ll strings have some tension, against which one must pull to lengthen the object
; this pull does work on the string, adding to its energy. Because string theori
es are by nature relativistic, adding energy to a string is equivalent to adding
mass, by Einstein's relation E = mc2. Therefore, the separation between D-brane
s controls the minimum mass open strings may have. Furthermore, affixing a stri
ng's endpoint to a brane influences the way the string can move and vibrate. Bec
ause particle states "emerge" from the string theory as the different vibrationa
l states the string can experience, the arrangement of D-branes controls the typ
es of particles present in the theory. One straightforward mechanism for a str
ing interaction is for two strings to join endpoints (or, conversely, for one st
ring to "split down the middle" and make two "daughter" strings). The masses o
f these strings will be influenced by the separation between the branes. The re
ason objects with more particles have more mass in general (of course this also
depends on the nature of the particles-- and strings) is because they have a hig
her quantity of strings. The string theory landscape also gives us some ideas r
egarding how many multiverses might be possible in omniverse. In string theory,
the number of different landscapes in false vacua ( a local minimum, but not th
e lowest energy state, even though it may remain stable for some time-- until it
is tunneled to a lower energy state by quantum fluctuations or the creation of
high energy particles) is quoted as 10^500-- The large number of possibilities
arises from different choices of Calabi-Yau manifolds and different values of ge
neralized magnetic fluxes over different homology cycles. Chaotic Inflation theo
ry outlines several different scenarios in which multiverses can either expand,
contract or even die through the "natural" selection of different laws of physic
s within each multiverse that causes its boundaries to behave in different ways
(for example, in some of them, the universe's "bubble" bursts as it spontaneousl
y tunnels into a lower vacuum state!) What causes these bubbles to form in th
e first place? The energy of the ZPE in the form of quantum fluctuations, which
will form many bubbles of false vacuum that inflae into miniunverses with rando
m characteristics. Each universe within the omniverse can have a different set
of constants and physical laws, which are subject to selection-- which determine
s each region's components (like galaxies, stars and planets and their arrangeme
nts-- like clusters, atoms, molecules, etc.) based and depedent upon the surviva
bility of the quantum components within that region. The end result will be a f
inite number of universes with physical laws consistent within each region of sp
acetime-- and which exist for periods of time dependent upon those physical laws
. Some might have life of a form different from ours; others might have no life
at all or something even more complex or so different that we cannot even imagi
ne it. Obviously we are in one of those universes with life. Due to quantum unc
ertainty energy fluctuations such as electron and its anti-particle a positron c
an arise spontaneously out of nothing but must disappear rapidly. The lower the
energy of the bubble, the longer it can exist. A gravitational field has negativ
e energy. Matter has positive energy. The 2 figures cancel out provided the univ
erse is completely flat. In that case the universe has zero energy and can theor
etically last forever. Variants of the bubble universe model postulate multiple
false vacuum states, which result in lower-energy false-vacuum “progeny” universes s
pawned, which in turn produce true vacuum state progeny universes within themsel
ves-- which is very similar to my model of parent-child universes. Important us
e of D-branes has been in the study of black holes. String theorists have const
ructed models in which a black hole is a very long (and hence very massive) stri
ng. Strings combined with brane theory sounds quite intriguing.... you can alre
ady see these networks on a much larger scale when you look at images of supercl
usters of galaxies and see how theyre arranged in a string like network that bri
dges the gap between huge voids. Strings with closed loops, like the graviton,
are completely free to move from membrane to membrane. Of the four force carrier
particles, the graviton is unique in this way. Researchers speculate that this
is the reason why investigation through the weak force, the strong force, and th
e electromagnetic force have not hinted at the possibility of extra dimensions.
This is yet another way in which gravity is different from the other forces. A
lso wondering if that's how gravity propagates itself across universes (as does
ZPE to achieve a balance between the bulk and the multiverses).... if the gravit
y brane is indeed one dimensional, the concept of one dimensional strings propag
ating its influence through the bulk and into the multiverse via blackhole-wormh
ole bridges/strings would be analogous to the existence of superclusters of gala
xies (universes) with large voids in between (the bulk) bridged by filamentary s
tructures (strings). I agree with this-- the microscale and macroscale phenomen
a we see are connected together in some way.... whether it be the empty space in
side the atom or the void between superclusters or whatever in between. Conside
r what happens inside an atom, outside and between atoms, etc., is likely the sa
me "connective tissue" that makes for the "voids" between galaxies and galaxy cl
usters. Nature seems to have a theme of repeating structures, no matter what th
e scale-- it shows that something very fundamental is at work which underlies it
all.<br /><br />Now what existed before the very first big bang? An interestin
g question! It seems to make sense that whatever existed before the very first
big bang caused the big bang itself, and was the origin of all matter and energy
not only in our own universe, or the multiverse, but the whole omniverse itself
. Zero Point Energy, being the ground state of energy in a vacuum, is a very go
od candidate for that role. In my model, ZPE is the energy state of the bulk, a
nd it acts as the fuel to spark the fires of creation, so to speak. In an oscil
lating universe, the big bangs would be able to sustain themselves once the firs
t one got started (or at least until they got back to the "singularity" stage),
but they would need that intial creative spark in the beginning, and I can see t
hat's where ZPE comes in. It would originate in the bulk, as that is the backgr
ound under which all the big bangs occur. This also helps to solve a problem in
physics which has been considered "unsolvable"-- namely, why doesnt the ZPE den
sity of the vacuum change with the volume of the universe? My answer to this wo
uld be-- clearly because ZPE originates from outside the universe, in the bulk,
and so the expansion of the universe doesnt affect the density of the ZPE. I be
lieve that ZPE emanates into our universe (and other universes) through quantum
foam and other types of blackhole-wormhole constructs and that, eventually, a ba
lance is reached between ZPE outside and inside the bulk and the omniverse (this
balance would also be the reason the predicted mass of the quantum vacuum has l
ittle effect on the expansion of the universe and why the energy density of the
dark energy component is of the same magnitude as the density of matter) and thi
s density is maintained with only a slight variance (seen as the Casimir Effect
and vacuum fluctuations) until we get close to the next big bang. Perhaps at th
is time, a rapid change in the density of ZPE inside the universe is what causes
the next big bang. And this would also help explain another so-called "unsolva
ble problem"-- why doesnt the large constant ZPE density of the vacuum cause a l
arge cosmological constant? Because a balance is achieved between the ZPE value
s inside the universe(s) and outside in the bulk! Because the cosmological cons
tant was created in order to explain the expansion of the universe (that is, "da
rk energy") we kill two birds with one stone: since both are the results of the
interactions of the gravity brane and ZPE upon the universe(s)! As a matter of
fact, just as dark matter can be explained as an interaction between the gravity
brane and our universe (via strings), so can dark energy be explained as an int
eraction between the ZPE of the bulk upon our universe to maintain an equilibriu
m density. Perhaps blackhole/wormhole pairs on the large scale and quantum foam
on the small scale are vehicles of both (they are, after all, merely reflection
s of cosmic strings.) Black holes might be the gravity sink that cause the inte
nse gravitational display of dark matter and wormholes might be the conduit that
brings massive quantities of energy (as ZPE and in other forms) into our univer
se, which is attributed to "dark energy." And on the microscale, quantum foam c
an do both-- resulting in the Casimir Effect, which displaces matter and energy,
albeit in very small degrees, but across vast distances of space-time and acros
s the omniverse. And, in addition to ZPE being the originator of the big bang(s
), and so the source of all matter and energy in the multiverse, I theorize that
the dimensions can be unified, just like the fundamental forces can (and that o
ther multiverses in the omniverse might have their own fundamental forces, depen
ding upon the laws of physics in those multiverse(s) and how the gravity brane a
nd ZPE act upon them.) Perhaps that one spatial dimension and one temporal dime
nsion of the bulk are the source of all the dimensions (the one spatial dimensio
n being the source of all 8 spatial dimensions and the one imaginary time dimens
ion being the source of all 3 temporal dimensions), just like ZPE was the source
of all matter and energy in the omniverse. <br /><br />So, to summarize, befor
e the big bang(s) we had ZPE and the one spatial and one temporal dimension of t
he bulk, as well as the gravity brane (whose actions in conjunction with ZPE upo
n the early stages of the big bang caused the fundamental forces to emerge-- and
thus they were the "originators" of the latter.) So, once again, the number 4
crops up in the creation equation (ZPE, 1Ds, 1Dt, Gravity). The fact that tempo
ral dimensions are considered separately from spatial ones just like gravity is
considered separately from the other fundamental forces creates a neat kind of s
ymmetry that makes me think that gravity and time are related and instrinsically
linked (since time emerged from the other 3 local dimensions first, just like g
ravity emerged from the other 3 local fundamental forces first.) At some point
in the far flung past, the four elements of the creation equation were all unite
d (interesting that the concept of 4 elements comes up!) and that would have bee
n before the gravity brane came into existence (the gravity brane probably came
into existence at the same time the one temporal dimension of imaginary time sep
arated from the one spatial dimension in the bulk-- and might have even been cau
sed by it, and the result might also have caused the generation of ZPE and/or be
en caused by it [or both, in true oscillatory fashion!], which ended up resultin
g in the big bang(s).... so now you see how everything falls into place and one
thing leads to another-- like a cascade effect, or dominoes!) The gravity bran
e's actions upon the universe(s) would be the reason why we have blackhole-wormh
ole conduits in the first place (the actions of the gravity brane on objects of
mass causing space-time to curve, and in the case of objects of "infinite" densi
ty causing them to separate from space-time entirely, and wormholes being create
d to channel the matter-energy that gets sucked in to create a new balance, whic
h also results in the creation of child universes and an expansion of the multiv
erse!)-- and the reason why a region which is considered an area where laws of p
hysics "break down" can now be explained when one considers extra dimensional sp
ace and what exists outside of space-time, so our known laws of physics are just
a subset of something greater, from which they originated. As a matter of fact
, if transversable wormholes can be generated or manipulated using ZPE, it would
be poetic justice-- as we'd be using the original energy of the omniverse to tr
avel within it and through space and time! The extra dimensions were always the
re, but they dont make themselves apparent until a singularity forms-- like a bi
g bang OR a blackhole-wormhole pair-- or something else which originates from be
yond our universe, like ZPE or gravity, enters the picture. On every day scale
s, we can make do with classical physics, as these are a suitable approximation
of reality. But when we get to larger and larger scales (or smaller and smaller
) we finally realize that they are just that-- approximations. In that way, th
ey mimic the universe itself. Because, just like our laws of physics are a subs
et of something greater, so is our universe and its dimensions and forces. Just
like what's considered infinite/undefined in the mathematics of our universe, i
snt such on a higher level. On a higher level, and yet also more fundamental--
an interesting and circular relationship! So the order of creation would have b
een: bulk-&gt;gravity brane-&gt;big bang(s)-&gt;multiverse(s). A journey thro
ugh a transversable wormhole would be pretty awe-inspiring, not just because of
where we were going, but what we were going through-- something which not only p
redates all of existence-- but was also the cause of creation! <br /><br />And
now, we come to the matter of the holographic principle-- which states that all
the information in the universe (matter, energy, dimensions, forces) etc. can be
stored on one boundary of the universe. How would such a large amount of data
be stored? Not as difficult as you might think-- as this is merely restating th
e fact that all of our dimensions, forces, matter and energy emerged from some b
asic factors from which they sprung. The holographic principle makes a great de
al of sense to me. Why? Because the universe seems to be symmetric on a vast r
ange of scales-- from the atom, to the solar system to the galaxy, to superclust
ers, and perhaps all the way up to the ultimate level-- the omniverse. This rep
etitiveness of scales indicates to me that there is something much simpler that
underlies all of this, and everything else is a projection of something very fun
damental....that everything we see around us is just a reflection of this hidden
underlying fabric-- which is where the holographic principle comes in. Interes
tingly enough, just to show how convergent different areas of research within co
smology are, fractal universe theory, which presents the universe as a clumpy st
ructure, rather than homogenous, also seems to give a nod towards the holographi
c principle, as it indicates the 4 dimensional large scale of the universe can b
e represented in only 2 dimensions on the Planck scale and fractal space-time to
boot, and suggest that the dimensionality of space evolves with time. Using no
ncommutative geometry, fractality also arises in this approach to quantum gravit
y, and time becomes an emergent property that naturally arises in this formulati
on. Not only that, but it seems the universe might be fractal on the largest of
scales also-- since the evolution of peaks in the bulk's ZPE led to the creatio
n if bubble universes. And analoging the holographic principle to ZPE like pen
to paper-- that seems to make a lot of sense to me also. Zero Point Energy, in
being the quantum ground state of a vacuum, the original energy of the omniverse
, would be the omniverse at its most fundamental level-- from which all else eme
rged. The ZPE would be the holograph of all matter and energy and the bulk of a
ll the dimensions and forces (through the action of the ZPE.) Since dark matte
r represents the aggregation of ZPE, and since dark matter leads to the organiza
tion and structure of galaxies, ZPE is responsible for the organizational nature
of our universe. Perhaps the clustered nature of the galaxies also thusly repr
esents the structure of the omniverse on a much reduced scale (since the superma
ssive black holes at the centers of galaxies could be gateways into other univer
ses).... in other words, we can see a holograph of the omniverse from within our
own universe! Or in other terms, the "son" (our Universe) is a reflection of t
he father (the omniverse). Analysis of the large scale structure of the universe
seems to indicate that there is both randomness and a hierarchical structure at
work-- this would perhaps indicate the influences of both quantum fluctuation a
nd organized structures beyond the universe influencing the structures within ou
r own universe (in other words, both ZPE and gravity.) Dark matter-- and thus t
he gravity brane and ZPE would influence where superclusters formed, and dark en
ergy-- and thus ZPE-- would influece the formation of supervoids. This duality
seems to mimic the duality of curved space time and quantum foam-- creating yet
another universal symmetry. And the idea that the omniverse is reflected in the
large scale structures of our own universe continues this theme of symmetry at
all levels. Continuing the theme of symmetry inside and outside our universe, t
he recently discovered cold spot in the cosmic background radiation has been hyp
othesized to indicate the presence of a parallel universe quantumly entangled wi
th our own. If proven true, this would be the first proof of the multiverse and
a major nod towards string theory. Along the same lines, the "Great Attractor"
might prove to lie towards the center of mass of a supercluster of multiverses
(if our galaxies can be organized into superclusters interspersed with supervoid
s, why shouldnt the omniverse be organized into superclusters of universes separ
ated by supervoids of the bulk?) Its interesting that the holographic principle
was first used to describe all the information stored in a black hole using its
surface area, not its volume and shows that our universe has much in common wit
h more conventional black holes, and perhaps the black holes we detect in our ow
n universe are the beginnings (or signs) of new universes in other dimensions.
The one dimensional bulk would fit in perfectly with the idea of an oscillatory
universe-- as the most often cited example of a one dimensional shape is a mobiu
s strip, which loops back upon itself, both beginning and ending at the same po
int. Thus, the bulk (and ZPE by extension) has no beginning and no ending. The
looping occurs over such a long interval, though, that the bulk appears "flat."
How can so many dimensions be "written" on a one dimensional bulk? Simple, th
e dimensions are compactified! This resolves the issue of why the universe "inf
lated" so quickly in its early period very well. Not only was it the action of
ZPE upon space-time, but since our dimensions are compactified, the inflation se
ems much more rapid than it really was (from the perspective of the bulk.) We h
ave been looking for compactified dimensions, not realizing that we ourselves ex
ist inside of them! <br /><br /> While the bulk's ZPE contains the entire histo
ry of the omniverse, our universe's own history would be written on space-time,
as the ZPE of the cosmic background radiation, which displays the history of our
own particular big bang. Not only that, but in the cosmic background radiation
is also written the period of explosive expansion known as "Inflation"-- much l
ike earth's sediment preserves the fossil record. As a matter of fact, since th
e bulk and its ZPE represent an early history of the omniverse itself, explorati
on of it through wormholes should be even more awe-inspiring since we would see
a "fossil record" of all of Creation itself-- along with energy signatures of d
ifferent multiverses in various stages of expansion or collapse-- and maybe even
in the process of big banging! <br /><br /> I theorize the dimensions and forc
es emerged from the same common "ancestor"-- and yet another symmetry was born--
the four forces and the four dimensions-- with gravity and time being the two "
black sheep" that dont fit in with the rest. If ZPR is fundamental to all the
energy in the omniverse, and the bulk to all the dimensions, then the actions of
the ZPE upon the bulk would be from where the forces arose (including the gravi
ty brane!) And what makes gravity so different from the other forces-- one, it
separated first, and two, it originates on its own brane. And imaginary time, t
he original time of the bulk, would also have arisen from interactions between t
he ZPE and the bulk. Before the omniverse there would have just been the bulk a
nd its zero point energy-- vacuum fluctuations of virtual particles, if you will
-- winking into and out of existence. It was on the surface of this dynamic "va
cuum" that the omniverse was written. And since the ZPE wasnt spread out equall
y, where it clumped and aggregated and started to accumulate for more than a few
trillionths of a second instead of "melting" away is where the first seeds of t
he omniverse were born. Perhaps we still see a "holograph" encoded into our spa
ce-time of where these aggregates are located (the aggregates to new universes i
n the making perhaps)-- in the form of dark matter. And the actions of the grav
ity brane on these massive clumps are what makes dark matter so mysterious. The
idea of aggregates coalescing into the first seeds doesnt sound too different f
rom the first vestiges of life appearing on our planet does it? The universe is
symmetric on so many scales!<br /><br /> I had posted a diagram in an earlier p
ost about the substructure of our universe on the microscopic level (under "Quan
tum Foam") and looking at all the peaks and valleys of this structure, its conce
ivable that entrances and exits into and out of the bulk lie in these peaks and
valleys and thats how virtual particles wink into and out of existence as they g
o from one part of the universe to another (or between universes) and explain th
e Casimir Effect. This would preserve the law of conservation of mass-energy wh
ile also keeping the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in place, as one couldnt b
e certain of exactly where these particles would be at any given moment, but at
the same time, no virtual particle would be created or destroyed, they would jus
t be reshuffled from one place to another within the omniverse. Quantum foam gi
ves us a window into the world beyond space-time into the bulk and ZPE, just as
much as looking at the most distant galaxies gives us a view into what the unive
rse was like just after the big bang. And this is the reason why different laws
of physics apply on the subplanck scale-- laws which existed before there were
dimensions and forces-- laws that predate our own universe! ZPE even occurs on
the subplanck scale, in the form of virtual quark pairs that account for the maj
ority of the proton's spin. Blackhole-Wormhole pairs would just be quantum foam
peaks and valleys on a higher level (as a matter of fact, when thinking of the
possible differences in blackhole-wormhole pairs that link us to second layer un
iverses and multiverses [those with physical laws and constants different from o
ur own] and other parallel universes within our own multiverse [those with the s
ame physical laws and constants]-- it occurs to me that the macroscopic black ho
le-wormhole couplets would be the ones to link us to either second layer univers
es and multiverses OR other locations within our own universe or local multivers
e and microscopic blackhole-wormhole pairs would be the ones that ONLY connect u
s to parallel universes within our own multiverse, as well as other parts of our
own universe. Intuitively, this makes sense, as the Afshar double slit experim
ent, as well as quantum tunneling and teleportation and the Casimir effect are m
uch more likely to redistribute matter and energy across our own multiverse, rat
her than through second layer universes or multiverses with different laws of ph
ysics and constants. Closed timelike curves near black holes could be the side
effect of being so close to the bulk and the gravity brane which lies beyond and
, as a matter of fact, quantum superposition can be explained as being a closed
timelike curve around a microscopic black hole (quantum foam), which enables the
particle to be in two places at the same time (from our point of view)-- becaus
e its stuck in a local time loop, just like a CTC can generate both future and p
ast time travel on all levels and macroscopic superposition near areas of high s
pace-time distortion, like black holes. As a matter of fact, CTC are a known sy
mptom of being close to an area where two dimensions of time intersect, which wo
uld neatly fit into the idea of them occuring near black holes-- where our dimen
sion of time and the one of the bulk intersects. Its interesting that they repr
esent a meeting place of multiple temporal dimensions and the gravity brane-- sh
owing yet another way gravity and time are linked. At present, the only type of
black holes known to be good candidates for coupling with transversable wormhol
es would be Kerr black holes, because their ring singularities create tunnels th
rough which macroscopic travel is possible through the bulk-- to either other po
ints in our space-time, the local multiverse, or even second layer universes. H
owever, given enough energy, we could create artificial transversable wormholes
through our own universe's space and time (requires the "least" energy-- relativ
ely speaking), in our multiverse (requires more energy), or even through second
layer universes or multiverses (requires the most energy of all, and we would ne
ed to maintain some sort of bubble of our own space-time to prevent some type of
catastrophe from being in a universe with different physical laws-- which we wo
uld need in making a journey through a transversable wormhole anyway, but it wou
ld be necessary to keep this bubble intact when we interact with a second layer
universe.) How to journey to a universe with different dimensions and/or physic
al laws? It would be very tricky. If it has different dimensions than our own,
then how would we fit our 3 dimensional selves into it-- or for that matter-- h
ow would we even see it? It might just seem like a point particle to us (since
it doesnt exist in our dimensions) and we might just seem like a point particle
to any life that exists there (which life in another part of our own universe--
let alone another universe entirely-- would probably be so different from us-- w
ould we even recognize it as life?-- especially if it was just made of energy or
interstellar dust or with a biochemistry different from ours, or if it existed
on a scale vastly different from ours-- that is, we might be like ants to them o
r vice versa!?) I wonder if our consciousness can be separated from our physica
l body (I guess we'll find out when we die-- although some claim to be able to d
o it through astral projection in dreams or waking states and witness events far
away in space and/or time from their physical bodies lol) and if so, then we do
nt have to obey the same laws since we will be energy instead of matter. As ene
rgy, we wouldnt be restricted to our own three dimensional space, nor would we n
oticeably degrade with time. Ive read some serious scientific work that states,
to the effect that, if evolution proceeds unchecked, it will eventually lead to
beings made completely of energy that think and communicate by the process of t
ransferring electric currents within their energy and passing those currents ont
o others (in effect, we'd have telepathy, because thoughts would be able to be c
ommunicated directly, without the need of a mouth or any other organs-- and at t
his stage of the game we would have no need for matter at all because the univer
se would consist mainly of energy.) This discussion is now bridging the gap bet
ween science and spirituality, but I do wonder if we have an energy component to
our consciousness that can be separated from our physical selves and which can
be used to journey into universes with other dimensions and/or laws of physics.
Why would we even want to go to universes with different physical laws or dimens
ions? Aside from the altruistic desire to explore other parts of reality-- I ca
n see a practical reason to do it also. If the physical laws are indeed differe
nt and if the fundamental forces are different (maybe up to 11 fundamental force
s to match 11 dimensions, the same number of forces in a given universe to match
the dimensions in that universe-- like ours?), then its possible that the other
universe exists in a higher energy state than our own, in which case we could o
btain massive amounts of "free energy" if we could establish an energy pump from
that universe to our own (of course, we would have to explore the ethical side
of the issue and hopefully not damage that universe or any of the beings that re
side within-- and perhaps aid them in establishing their own free energy pump an
d so on.) I do agree with Penrose, that there is a quantum component to our co
nsciousness (maybe the main component) that might be able to be transferred acro
ss space and time and even to other dimensions of other universes. I find it in
teresting that both he and Jung believe in a collective consciousness that can e
xtend to other dimensions-- like a network of strings (much like the connection
s between galaxies or universes on all scales-- as well as the bonds that connec
t atoms together in a molecule.) ESP, if it does actually occur, might be expla
ined as ripples along these strings of consciousness (that are strong depending
on our emotional and/or genetic connection to that person-- which might extend t
o the afterlife, which, if it exists, would just be a higher energy state of a p
erson's conscious energy) that extend through other dimensions and space-time.
Which is why it would seem to violate laws of physics when it doesnt violate the
m if you consider extradimensional physics and the fact that these instincts are
buried inside of us and weakened by lack of use and exposure to the physical wo
rld. Maybe our mythology had some basis in fact-- and perhaps, this is because
we are a part of the universe, and on some instinctive level we have the univers
e's "memories" of how it began inside of us, but to associate them to everyday t
hings we understand-- that is where mythology and religion came from-- they are
basically a diluted version of the truth. Im not a religious person, but I am s
piritual. I believe that religion was always used as a way of trying to underst
and the unknown-- there is truth to it, but its watered down. I think we hold t
he key to the truth within ourselves-- for we are a part of the truth that we ar
e seeking. But our environment makes it difficult to unlock it, because we real
ly have nothing to compare it to. Its like my earlier analogy of cavemen trying
to figure out how to design and run a car-- they simply dont have the real worl
d experience to be able to do it, although in principle the knowledge of how suc
h a machine would work (in basics) is probably programmed into their brains. We
might have to transfer our consciousness into a being that exists in another La
yer 2 universe because we would need their senses in order to perceive their env
ironment and we would need their bodies in order to cope with their physical uni
verse (even if the dimensions are the same, different physical laws might mean t
hat the size of everything is different-- for example cosmic rays could be the s
ize of planes and planets the size of pimples or the universe might be mostly co
mposed of antimatter, or time might progress much faster or slower or not move a
t all, if they have a different temporal dimension from ours.) Of course, if we
dont want to face an ethical dillemma, we would need their permission first-- p
erhaps an exchange of equal length would be in order! The really interesting ca
se would be if some of our dimensions from our universe were present in an alter
nate universe, but not others-- like, for example, if they had length and width
but substitute a different dimension for depth. In that case, their universe wo
uld seem flat as a pancake to us! Or if the dimension of time is different-- it
would be frozen in place right at the beginning, according to our senses. Henc
e the need for projecting conscious energy into the bodies of that universe's ow
n residents. As far as time travel is concerned within Layer 1 or Layer 2, this
is an interesting idea, and I believe you can invoke MWI here--- going backward
s in time would merely get you onto a different timeline and different layer 1 u
niverse (of that particular multiverse), parallel to the one you left. Also, in
extradimensional theory, there is an extra dimension of time invoked which woul
d remove many of the paradoxes involved with time travel-- either backwards or f
orwards. I believe Kaku found a way around the problem of the earth moving in s
pace while we were time traveling and the problem of taking "information" from o
ur universe to another one-- I'll have to look into that. Its on <a href="http:
//www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vbWtha3Uub3Jn">mkaku.org</a> It might also involv
e transferring our conscious energy into another being (preferably ourselves-- i
f its in a parallel universe.) The time bubble I mentioned would probably work
like the Alcubierre space warp bubble, which would enable hyperluminal speeds by
distorting space-time and riding it like a "wave"-- the similarities of both co
nstructs shows how superluminal travel and time travel are instrincally linked.
And then we have the matter of closed timelike curves-- which means gravity has
to be thrown into the equation also. After reading what Linde wrote concerning
the ability to construct a universe within a laboratory (or a collider) and not
have it wreck the universe we're in because it would curve in upon itself and b
asically look like a subatomic particle, it got me thinking--- what if our unive
rse is just a subatomic particle in someone else's much larger universe? And wh
at if our subatomic particles are nothing more than tiny universes (on our scale
)-- and the reason why we cant see any structure in particles like the electron,
the positron, etc-- is because they contain their own physical laws inside them
selves-- but on the outside, they obey the laws of our physical world (We've se
en this kind of thing before, as Quantum Mechanics gives way to Newtonian physic
s on the every day level and Einsteinian Physics on Relativistic scales-- one is
basically a subset of the other.) It doesnt seem very likely at all, but I fin
d this idea whimsical and it would in some sense solve the antimatter question--
as one could envision a universe made up of the equivalent of an electron would
be composed of mainly matter and one the equivalent of a positron would be main
ly antimatter. Perhaps the omniverse is layered in this way also (something we'
ve seen at the subatomic level when comparing electrons to muons to tauons) and
if that was the case, more than likely we'd be an "in between universe" with man
y underneath us and many above us also. Comparing ourselves to whatever superve
rse lies "above us" perhaps their atoms are nothing more than clusters of univer
ses, densely packed near the center (and with the large empty spaces inside the
atoms mainly composed of ZPE and bulk), with the nucleus packed like the way the
center of our own galaxy is packed, and molecules are nothing more than supercl
usters of multiverses with blackhole-wormhole connections (chemical bonds?!) bet
ween them. This idea is really far out there-- but its interesting to think abo
ut nonetheless. Perhaps the nuclear force is merely the equivalent of our gravi
tational force on the scale of a microuniverse (one that appears to be a subatom
ic particle on our own scale.) In that case, the strong nuclear force, would bi
nd the microuniverses together (gravity propagated through strings made of gluon
s creating blackhole-wormhole pairs?) and the weak nuclear force would break the
m apart in the process of fission (dark energy?) The elements-- not to mention
subatomic particles-- that would exist in these realities would be extremely exo
tic and nothing like ours-- not to mention their laws of physics! I decided to
leave this out of my theory for fear of making it much more complicated, but I t
hought that perhaps the bulk and the zpe within it also undergoes a "big bang" b
ut at a much larger timescale than the rest of the omniverse (though the omniver
se big bangs would also be an integer divisor of the bulk/zpe big bang-- the one
s that are stable and longlasting, anyway).... the problems that arise here incl
ude the fact that if this is correct, you then have to have something outside th
e bulk and something even more fundamental than ZPE on the outside of the omnive
rse, more dimensions, etc, and then our omniverse becomes just one of many. At
which level would this stop? Would it just go on ad infinitum or what? I know
in the physics community there are some who believe that quarks arent the funda
mental form of matter and that preons are what quarks are made of. (I have even
seen some state that preon stars could prove this, just like quark stars were a
stronomical proof of quarks.) Again, when does it stop? What exactly is fundam
ental-- or does that word even have any real meaning? Maybe the deeper we look,
the more we will see that nothing is fundamental and everything is made of some
thing simpler and everything also makes up something more complex-- a puzzle ins
ide a paradox inside a conundrum inside a... It would mean the bulk oscillate
s and omniverse oscillates at frequencies that are integer divisors of the bulk
oscillation-- goes on indefinitely at higher levels and lower levels (maybe ins
ide black holes-- which contain their own microomniverses?)-- the gravity brane
makes the bulk oscillate (inside black holes for microverses also-- as microbulk
s)-- there are other bulks within their own omniverses inside the superbulk that
also do this-- each with their own physical laws, dimensions, forces and consta
nts. Of course, the gravity brane would be the one which they all had in common
on different levels, it would just manifest itself as a different force on each
level (like the strong nuclear force, for example.) This completely sidesteps
the idea that perhaps our own universe was generated in some sort of laboratory
somewhere by I guess you could call it "God" but I would just call it some bum w
ith too much time on their hands! The thing is our universe and everything insi
de it seems to huge to us but to someone on the outside it might be the size of
a point, in their own dimensions. And according to some cosmologists, one way a
creator could give us an idea that they made us would be to make some laws of p
hysics that behave according to some exact numbers-- and these "special numbers,
" called constants-- would hold the key to what they were trying to communicate
(because math is the universal language.) One other theory I would like to ment
ion is Kris Shield's double manifold theory which holds that our universe can be
divided into two compartments, one with matter and the other with antimatter, a
nd the two big bang at opposite parts of their respective timelines, with ZPE th
e boundary or domain wall between the two. Is it possible that matter would be
converted directly to antimatter and vice versa as it "crossed over"? If that i
s the case, I can see how ZPE would be the boundary, as energy is neither matter
nor antimatter. Would we be able to travel back and forth? (errr, afterlife a
nd reincarnation in their natural state for both sides and limbo for the barrier
in between? I dont know if I want to attempt to go there in a "forced" state l
ol) Would we be able to utilize this duality as a portal to travel to other por
tions of our own universe via extradimensional space? I remember back a few yea
rs ago reading about an old theory concerning a dual universe structure in which
we were one universe with always subliminal speeds, and there was a luxon barri
er where everything traveled the speed of light and then there was the tachyon u
niverse where everything always traveled over the speed of light. Im wondering
if we could apply this to Kris' theory in a novel manner. Let's say that the r
eason we cant see anything on the other side of the manifold is because, from ou
r perspective, everything on the other side has imaginary mass and always travel
s at superluminal velocities, and the reason why they cant see us is because of
the same thing. So, we think THEY are made of tachyons and have imaginary mass
and they think WE are made of tachyons and have imaginary mass. And the luxon w
all where everything always travels at the speed of light would be the ZPE (now
that gives going "into the light" new meaning-- and the reason spirits/ghosts ne
ver seem to age, for they would be traveling at the speed of light in limbo aka
the ZPE!!) Besides the idea that "the other side" would always seem to be trave
ling at superluminal velocities (which in reality neither was), another reason i
t would evade detection is that from our side it would seem to violate causality
and to be traveling backward in time (which they would think we were doing inst
ead-- if they could see us being "reborn"!) The two things which seem to violate
symmetry are the monodirection of time and the lack of antimatter in our univer
se. Perhaps we will find a reflection of our universe which balances these out
and preserves the symmetries. The double manifold theory would preserve this sy
mmetry because it would seem (from our view, if we could see them!) to be going
backward in time (as we would seem to be, from their view) and it would be compo
sed of antimatter (which we would seem to be from their view.) If ZPE is indeed
a holograph of our universe (and is written in space-time, which is ZPE), then
we cant see "the other side" because all we see is a holograph of our own realit
y, like a mirror-- and the same goes for them also. In this case, black holes w
ould really be the only source of information-- its just too bad that they're si
ngularities, which would preclude us from learning-- unless we found or made a t
ransversable worm hole to go there (with the aforementioned protection), that is
. Mass would be exchanged between both universes through wormholes and quantum
foam-- until it tipped over one or the other universe into a "big bang" and then
the cycle would repeat-- this time, for the other universe. The beauty of it i
s, that it preserves causation and conservation laws all the while producing ast
ounding effects that SEEM to violate causation. And it fits in with my omnivers
e theory, as each universe (whether it be a layer 1 parallel or layer 2 exotic u
niverse) would have its own alterego-- an "antiuniverse," if you will-- just lik
e each particle has its own antiparticle. Of course getting into the "antiverse
" for any particular universe would be highly problematic, as we dont want to be
annihilated with all that antimatter around (good thing we have that ZPE barrie
r)! Exchanging conscious energy with a resident being would do the trick though
(ghosts in inanimate form, possessed beings in animate form?!)-- since energy i
s neutral and can exist stably in any universe or antiuniverse! This duality m
akes for a yin-yang dual universe (another example of philosophy meeting science
-- much like Immanuel Kant's "island universes.") It can also be considered our
mirror universe, as it would be an antimatter version of us (and we of them), s
o all handedness in nature would be the reverse of ours (although we would not r
etain any memory of handedness in case of reincarnation and so would not notice
that-- as a matter of fact, we shouldn't be able to retain any memories-- unless
we met someone we were emotionally connected to-- which might be an explanation
of "soulmates," etc.-- in which case we might think we'd known them "forever" b
ut without any specific memories, unless something traumatic happened to "shock"
our consciousness into remembering them [although latent memories might be brou
ght out with regressive hypnosis]-- which would also occur in the case of ghosts
or spirits [if they are real]-- causing them to be trapped in limbo-- aka the Z
PE-- never aging because they're energy, replaying their last traumatic memories
, and their energy in the "barrier" causing electromagnetic interference, cold s
pots with their negative energy and, in extreme cases, movement of physical obje
cts-- needing some kind of realization of their predicament to complete the jour
ney into the antiverse, preferably through their summoning and recognization of
their "loved ones.") Perhaps the complete set of universes, along with their mi
rror antiverses (or mirrorverses), microverses and miniverses with their microbu
lk or minibulk (which are subatomic particles and the "empty" area in between--
which actually contains zpe-- in those universes), their multiverses (Layer 1 pa
rallel time universes), Layer 2 multiverses (those with different physical laws
and/or dimensions) and their bulk and superverses (those in which the omniverse
below comprises all the elementary subatomic particles) along with their superbu
lk should, as a whole, be termed the hyperverse. The only thing all the layers
would have in common would be ZPE (called quintessence-- or the "fifth element"
by the Greeks and various other cultures-- its intriguing that these historical
cultures theorized its existence millennia ago-- which shows me human instincts
can deduce a diluted version of the truth, because they are a part of it and th
e reason its diluted is because they need to associate it with something their c
ulture is familiar with) and the gravity brane, the balance of which (push and p
ull, expansion and contraction) keep everything together. The big problems we w
ould face in trying to examine a universe with different laws of physics or othe
r dimensions would be, first of all, trying to determine if life exists there (o
r can exist) and if so, finding a way to communicate with it. Aside from the fa
ct that the intelligent life might be so alien as for us to not be able to recog
nize it (maybe made of energy) how would we "talk" to it? Perhaps with the only
two things our universes might have in common-- energy and math. In other word
s, sending beams of energy in mathematical patterns-- for example, binary code.
In layer 1 parallel universes and in the antiverse, this should be much easier,
as there should be humans who speak earth languages in those-- however, we woul
d need to make sure we were "looking" in the right part of said universe (Milky
Way galaxy, Orion sector)-- but this is likely to be alleviated by the fact that
the blackhole-wormhole connections that would lead us there would probably lead
to the same parts of local space that we are in. As you can see, the omniverse
has many different paths (cosmological background radiation, strings, holograph
ic principle, multiverse, branes, ZPE, gravity, bulk, blackholes, wormholes, qua
ntum foam, etc.) to the same goal on many different scales (subplanck, quantum,
atoms, molecules, planetary systems, stars, galaxies, clusters, superclusters, m
ultiverses, etc., even life itself!)-- but what they all have in common (besides
having the same underlying fundamental factors) is that they all seek to achiev
e a balance between what's on the outside and what's on the inside-- and thus, t
he fate of our universe and of the whole omniverse is, and always has been, as i
nevitable as it is circular. And the fact that quantum foam and macroscopic bla
ck holes might essentially be the same thing on different scales makes it appare
nt that these would all be features connecting both relativity AND quantum mecha
nics (and add the unification of gravity through the gravity brane)-- going a lo
ng way towards unifying both the microscopically proven quantum theory and the m
acroscopically proven relativity!<br /><br /></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=531527230'>1
0:53 PM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=531527230' i
d='cmtCount_531527230'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_531527230'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount10'
>0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl10_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(531527230);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_531527230" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 531527230);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 531527230);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 531527230);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5315272
30);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 531527230);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 531527230);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 531527230);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53152723
0);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 531527230);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 531527230);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 531527230);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 531527230);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 531527230);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 531527230);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 531527230);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 531527230);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
31527230);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 531527230);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 531527230);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 531527230);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53152723
0);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 531527230);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 531527230);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 531527230);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 531527230
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 531527230);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 531527230);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 531527230);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53152723
0);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 531527230);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 531527230);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 531527230);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 531527230
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 531527230);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 531527230);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 531527230);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 531527230);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 531527230);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 531527230);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 531527230);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 531527230);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=531527230'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=531527230'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
March 12, 2010 - Friday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_530814983">Forum Interview</label>
</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_530814983" class="blogContent">Hawkings is a great physicist, but he's st
ill a human being. Many of his theories have been bested by others. Look up "I b
eat Hawkings" on the Discovery Magazine website, it details how the physicist Ki
p Thorne formulated a mathematical model for how one could construct a transvers
ible wormhole to either a) go from point A to point B at a quicker rate than lig
ht traveling in a vacuum or b) as a time travel device and thereby beat Hawkings
in a well publicized bet.<br /><br />Also an intelligent race capable of inters
tellar travel would be more evolved than us, on a cultural level especially. The
y should have outgrown the need for violence-- a very primitive behavior pattern
and part of the fight-flight response programmed into the limbic system (a part
of our brains thats been in existence since the first animals swam in the seas.
)<br /><br />Another thing-- if we found intelligent life, would we recognize it
as such? For that matter, would it recognize us? What about life based on silco
n, which is closely related to carbon, or something completely alien-- intellige
nt life based on energy that exists in interstellar space? You think thats unlik
ely-- theyve found complex organic compounds in the vastness of interstellar spa
ce! Who needs planets anyway (although weve found hundreds of them and we're jus
t starting.)<br /><br />Another thing-- there is the possibility that other inte
lligent life might exist right here on earth and we wouldnt even recognize it! L
ook up the term "shadow life". Here is a research paper I found that shows how e
ven unicellular organisms could be intelligent (its in a thread I posted below)-
- short excerpt:<br /><br />Although it is a unicellular organism, Physarum poly
cephalum displays<br />remarkably intelligent abilities: it is able to solve maz
es2 and geometrical puzzles3,<br />control robots4, and may even be able to lear
n and recall past events1.<br /><br />something that adds some weight to the ide
a of faster than light travel is the fact that space-time itself is expanding at
faster than the speed of light. Proof of this comes from dark flow.<br /><br />
WASHINGTON -- Using data from NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)
, scientists have identified an unexpected motion in distant galaxy clusters. Th
e cause, they suggest, is the gravitational attraction of matter that lies beyon
d the observable universe.<br /><br />"The clusters show a small but measurable
velocity that is independent of the universe's expansion and does not change as
distances increase," says lead researcher Alexander Kashlinsky at NASA's Goddard
Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "We never expected to find anything like
this."<br /><br />Kashlinsky calls this collective motion a "dark flow" in the v
ein of more familiar cosmological mysteries: dark energy and dark matter. "The d
istribution of matter in the observed universe cannot account for this motion,"
he says.<br /><br />Hot X-ray-emitting gas in a galaxy cluster scatters photons
from the cosmic microwave background. Clusters don't precisely follow the expans
ion of space, so the wavelengths of scattered photons change in a way that refle
cts each cluster's individual motion.<br /><br />This results in a minute shift
of the microwave background's temperature in the cluster's direction. Astronomer
s refer to this change as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect.<br /><br
/>A related distortion, known as the thermal SZ effect, has been observed in ga
laxy clusters since the 1980s. But the kinematic version is less than one-tenth
as strong and has not been detected in any cluster.<br /><br />In 2000, Kashlins
ky and Fernando Atrio-Barandela from the University of Salamanca, Spain, showed
that astronomers could, in essence, amplify the effect isolating the kinematic S
Z term. The trick, they found, is to study large numbers of clusters.<br /><br /
>The astronomers teamed up with Dale Kocevski at the University of California, D
avis, and Harald Ebeling from the University of Hawaii to identify some 700 X-ra
y clusters that could be used to find the subtle spectral shift. This sample inc
ludes objects up to 6 billion light-years - or nearly half of the observable uni
verse - away.<br /><br />Using the cluster catalog and WMAP's three-year view of
the microwave background, the astronomers detected bulk cluster motions of near
ly 2 million miles per hour. The clusters are heading toward a 20-degree patch o
f sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela.<br /><br />What's more,
this motion is constant out to at least a billion light-years. "Because the dark
flow already extends so far, it likely extends across the visible universe," Ka
shlinsky says.<br /><br />The finding flies in the face of predictions from stan
dard cosmological models, which describe such motions as decreasing at ever grea
ter distances.<br /><br />Cosmologists view the microwave background - a flash o
f light emitted 380,000 years after the big bang - as the universe's ultimate re
ference frame. Relative to it, all large-scale motion should show no preferred d
irection.<br /><br />Big-bang models that include a feature called inflation off
er a possible explanation for the flow. Inflation is a brief hyper-expansion ear
ly in the universe's history. If inflation did occur, then the universe we can s
ee is only a small portion of the whole cosmos.<br /><br />WMAP data released in
2006 support the idea that our universe experienced inflation. Kashlinsky and h
is team suggest that their clusters are responding to the gravitational attracti
on of matter that was pushed far beyond the observable universe by inflation. "T
his measurement may give us a way to explore the state of the cosmos before infl
ation occurred," he says.<br /><br />The next step is to narrow down uncertainti
es in the measurements. "We need a more accurate accounting of how the million-d
egree gas in these galaxy clusters is distributed," says Atrio-Barandela.<br /><
br />"We're assembling an even larger and deeper catalog of X-ray clusters to be
tter measure the flow," Ebeling adds. The researchers also plan to extend their
analysis by using the latest WMAP results, released in March.<br /><br />The res
ults will appear this week in the electronic edition of Astrophysical Journal Le
tters.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFod
HRwOi8vd3d3Lm5ld3NjaWVudA==">http://www.newscient</a>...ic-horizon.html<br /><br
/><br /><br />Galaxy flow hints at huge masses over cosmic horizon<br /><br />*
16:15 25 September 2008 by Anil Ananthaswamy<br />* For similar stories, visit
the Cosmology Topic Guide <br /><br />Hundreds of clusters of galaxies are strea
ming en masse towards a region at the edge of the visible universe. The discover
y has taken astronomers completely by surprise because the movement is independe
nt of the universe's expansion.<br /><br />A team led by Alexander Kashlinsky of
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, stumbled upon the fl
ow while studying how galaxy clusters affect the photons of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB), the radiation left over from the big bang.<br /><br />Kashlin
sky has dubbed the stream "dark flow" to align it with the other as yet-unexplai
ned characteristics of the universe, dark matter and dark energy.<br /><br />The
discovery arose because the movement of the clusters changed the frequency of C
MB photons, creating a Doppler effect, the characteristic signature of movement.
"To our great surprise, we found a very weak but identifiable [Doppler] signal,
significantly above the noise," Kashlinsky told New Scientist.<br /><br />Accor
ding to the observations, the clusters are all moving towards a patch of sky tha
t lies between the constellations Vela and Centaurus. Some are speeding away at
about 1000 kilometres per second, and it seems likely the flow continues to the
edge of the visible universe.<br /><br />"This motion extends all the way to at
least a billion light years, and perhaps longer," says Kashlinsky. "If it alread
y goes so far, it would be very puzzling if it just stopped."<br />Mystery mass<
br /><br />No one knows what might be causing the flow. The best guess so far is
the gravitational pull of something with a very large mass that lies outside ou
r observable universe. "I don't know if I would call it matter. It could be some
gigantic singularity," Kashlinsky says.<br /><br />If there is something so mas
sive beyond the edge of the visible universe, it could provide support for infla
tion theory, which suggests that our universe underwent a period of exponential
expansion just after it began. Inflation suggests that massive structures, thoug
h not visible to us, could exist beyond our horizon.<br /><br />Dark flow is not
the first CMB anomaly to hint at large-scale structures that cannot be explaine
d. Hans Kristian Eriksen of the University of Oslo in Norway, who has done simil
ar work, says the new study "is very interesting".<br /><br />"It suggests that
there are structures on larger scales than people have believed so far," he says
.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vZW4ud2lraXBlZGlh
">http://en.wikipedia</a>....rvable_universe<br /><br />The universe versus the
observable universe<br />While special relativity constrains objects in the univ
erse from moving faster than the speed of light with respect to each other, ther
e is no such constraint when space itself is expanding. This means that the size
of the observable universe could be smaller than the entire universe; there are
some parts of the universe which might never be close enough for the light to o
vercome the speed of the expansion of space, in order to be observed on Earth. S
ome parts of the universe which are currently observable may later be unobservab
le due to ongoing expansion.[1][2]<br />Some parts of the universe may simply be
too far away for the light from there to have reached Earth, but despite the ex
pansion of space, at a later time could be observed.<br />Both popular and profe
ssional research articles in cosmology often use the term "universe" to mean "ob
servable universe". This can be justified on the grounds that we can never know
anything by direct experimentation about any part of the universe that is causal
ly disconnected from us, although many credible theories require a total univers
e much larger than the observable universe. No evidence exists to suggest that t
he boundary of the observable universe corresponds precisely to the physical bou
ndary of the universe (if such a boundary exists); this is exceedingly unlikely
in that it would imply that Earth is exactly at the center of the universe, in v
iolation of the cosmological principle. It is likely that the galaxies within ou
r visible universe represent only a minuscule fraction of the galaxies in the un
iverse. According to the theory of cosmic inflation and its founder, Alan Guth,
the entire universe could be (at least) 1023 to 1026 times as large in volume as
the observable universe. For comparison: assuming a factor of 1024, then the ob
servable universe in comparison with the entire universe would be about the same
as the earth compared with a sphere with a diameter of just over a lightyear, o
r about the same as an orange in comparison with the earth.<br />It is also poss
ible that the universe is smaller than the observable universe. In this case, wh
at we take to be very distant galaxies may actually be duplicate images of nearb
y galaxies, formed by light that has circumnavigated the universe. It is difficu
lt to test this hypothesis experimentally because different images of a galaxy w
ould show different eras in its history, and consequently might appear quite dif
ferent. A 2004 paper [3] claims to establish a lower bound of 24 gigaparsecs (78
billion light-years) on the diameter of the whole universe, making it, at most,
only slightly smaller than the observable universe. This value is based on matc
hing-circle analysis of the WMAP data. However, if the recent discovery of dark
flow proves to be accurate, it strongly suggests that there is matter beyond the
observable universe.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRw
Oi8vdW5pdmVyc2U=">http://universe</a>-revi...02-cosmicbg.htm<br /><br />Im kind
of the opinion that intelligent life is inevitable but the galaxy (let alone uni
verse) is so damn big we cant find it (or we dont know what to look for.) Also i
f you think about it, intelligent life could have happened many times before, bu
t we had an ELE (mass extinction) to stop evolution for awhile. For example, bef
ore the dinosaurs were exterminated, they were actually becoming warm blooded, h
ad stereoscopic vision and had advanced hunting/stalking skills. They were on th
eir way.<br /><br />the fact that evolution picked itself up and moved forward f
rom the ELE and we're here to talk about it proves how resilient life is and how
intelligent life might be inevitable (unless there's a cataclysmic event to des
troy the planet.)<br /><br />Its kind of cool to think about. Although I think w
e have 1 billion years before the sun becomes too warm to support life (unless w
e move the planet or colonize mars.) 1 billion years is a hell of a long time, e
ven 1 million... if you think of where humanity was 1 million years ago (hairy a
pe men just learning to use tools and walk upright.) it shows me that once the s
park of intelligence is lit, things happen rather fast (in terms of evolution an
yway.)<br /><br />By the way, its often been asked why did intelligent life deve
lop? Ive heard it said its because when apes came down from the trees and starte
d to walk upright, they needed to use their hands and a bigger brain helped them
process the enhanced interactions they had with their environment (feeling thei
r environment with their hands, stereoscopic vision etc.) The funny thing is, th
is was starting to happen with the dinosaurs 70 million years ago, before it got
rudely interrupted (lucky for us huh?) It shows that the road to intelligence i
snt something that happens only once, even on the same planet. I like our chance
s of one day finding it elsewhere.<br /><br />Yeah, who really knows where socie
ty will be in 100 years, let alone 1000, 10,000, 100,000, 1 million.<br /><br />
I dont think we'll be radically different in 100 years (although who knows with
the way technology evolves), but all bets are off past that.<br /><br />yeah, an
d lets not even get into the idea of multiple universes (an idea Hawking champio
ned btw) the whole idea being that each universe has its own set of physical law
s so each universe would be radically different in ways we cant really imagine (
well we can, but not really-- one example would be a universe where the gravity
was so strong that everything was super small, so maybe stars the size of basket
balls and planets the size of grains of sand, and people, well, theyd be the siz
e of subatomic particles lol. but to them, everything would seem like it is to u
s because their whole universe existed "to scale." And then we have the other en
d of the scale...) Everything is a matter of relative perspective and our proble
m is, frankly, we're just too used to our little corner of the cosmos to really
be able to know whats out there or explain it. Observations from a distance thro
ugh telescopes just doesnt cut it.<br /><br />yeah, there's no reasons things "h
ave to be" exactly the same size, shape or whatever, its just thats how it turne
d out. actually one of the other articles I posted indicated that as you look fu
rther out into space (and back in time) everything seems to get larger. So I gue
ss you could say that not only could other universes be very different from ours
(maybe even different dimensions from ours!), but our own universe could be und
ergoing an evolution on a scale so slow we dont even know it (it was going on mu
ch faster when it was younger.) The laws of physics and constants like the speed
of light might have been radically different back then (and when we look at far
away galaxies, we might not be just looking back in time, but back when the laws
of physics were different than they are now, and maybe they and the constants a
re continuing to change but so slow that we cant tell-- just like evolution). Of
course even if something like the speed of light changed at a rate that we coul
d tell, we still might not be able to because, who knows, maybe everything else
changes right along with it-- so the units we use to measure stuff like the mile
, kilometer, second, kilogram, whatever, are changing in tandem so we cant tell
that anything is different. Youd need an "outside observer" (an observer from ou
tside the universe in some kind of space-time bubble of their own universe, if t
hats even possible) to be able to tell-- and they would just be able to tell wha
ts going on in our universe, but perhaps not in their own. The basic point here
is its pretty difficult to know whats actually going on inside a seemingly close
d system that youre a part of.<br /><br />Its weird how different facets of exis
tence seem to have things in common, just on different scales and perspective, l
ike you said-- youve got atoms with nuclei and electrons that exist in shells ar
ound them, then youve got stars with planets orbitting them, and those stars orb
it a galactic center that could be a supermassive black hole. On earth we have e
volution that leads to the survival of some species over others, the human speci
es evolves culturally from caveman through stone age and iron age, through feuda
l society, through preindustrial and industrial and now technological, stars evo
lve from blue to yellow to red (blue-- hottest, yellow-- intermediate, red-- coo
lest) and on the galactic scale we have galaxies that evolve from circular to sp
iral, and on an even larger scale we have a universe that could be evolving on i
ts own scale-- along with a bunch of other possible universes that could be evol
ving slower or faster (possibly depending on age.)<br /><br />Same here, and I t
hink that would resolve time travel paradoxes because if it was possible to move
"lateral" in time, you wouldnt be changing your past or altering the future.<br
/></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530814983'>4
:02 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530814983' i
d='cmtCount_530814983'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_530814983'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount11'
>0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl11_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(530814983);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_530814983" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 530814983);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 530814983);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 530814983);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5308149
83);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 530814983);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 530814983);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 530814983);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53081498
3);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 530814983);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 530814983);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 530814983);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 530814983);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 530814983);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 530814983);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 530814983);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 530814983);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
30814983);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 530814983);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 530814983);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 530814983);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53081498
3);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 530814983);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 530814983);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 530814983);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 530814983
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 530814983);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 530814983);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 530814983);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53081498
3);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 530814983);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 530814983);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 530814983);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 530814983
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 530814983);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 530814983);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 530814983);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 530814983);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 530814983);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 530814983);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 530814983);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 530814983);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=530814983'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=530814983'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
March 12, 2010 - Friday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_530814711">Relationships</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_530814711" class="blogContent"><font size="3" style="border-collapse: sep
arate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; f
ont-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: no
rmal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-
transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-bord
er-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-d
ecorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-
width: 0px; " class="Apple-style-span"><font size="undefined" style="color: rgb(
255, 255, 255); font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1
3px; " class="Apple-style-span"><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padd
ing-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; ">Relationships...€</div><div style="margin-to
p: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0p
x; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><font color="&#
035;000000">This is in response to this article:</font></div><div style="margin-
top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top:
0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><font color="
&#035;000000"><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnRvdWdoZ2lybDEwM
S5jb20vMjAwOC8xMi91bmVtb3Rpb25hbC13b21lbi8=">http://www.toughgirl101.com/2008/12
/unemotional-women/</a></font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0
px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px;
padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><font color="&#035;000000">my comment<
/font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; pad
ding-left: 0px; "><font color="&#035;000000"><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MD
FodHRwOi8vd3d3LnRvdWdoZ2lybDEwMS5jb20vMjAwOC8xMi91bmVtb3Rpb25hbC13b21lbi9jb21tZW
50LXBhZ2UtMS8mIzAzNTtjb21tZW50LTU5MDg=">http://www.toughgirl101.com/2008/12/unem
otional-women/comment-page-1/&#035;comment-5908</a></font></div><div style="marg
in-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-to
p: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><font colo
r="&#035;000000">John, I think you absolutely hit the nail on the head. Love is
an emotional thing, why be with someone if you wont be emotional? I think you ne
ed to balance emotionality and rationality, because, like most things in life, b
alance works best, not either extreme. I am a very emotional guy who is with a r
eserved (I wouldnt say unemotional woman.) Actually anyone who says theyre unemo
tional is lying to themselves, because everyone is emotional to some extent, its
part of our brain chemistry. You might try to supress it, but it will always be
there. Ice queens are misunderstood, they are emotional, but they know when to
control it and when to let it out, and men must understand that their behavior d
oesnt mean they care any less, but because theyve learned the best way to respon
d in a situation, so they dont inflame it, but deal with it thoughtfully, to ens
ure the best possible outcome. But that doesnt mean they cant let loose emotiona
lly, w</font><font color="&#035;000000">hen the situation calls for it either! Y
ou must be emotional to some</font><font color="&#035;000000"> extent, to allow
yourself to experience the highs of a relationship, even though there will also
be some lows (but not go to extremes of emotionality either, or else the lows wi
ll hurt the relationship more than the highs will help it grow)-- but thats how
a relationship gets tested to see if its meant to last.</font></div><div style="
margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; paddin
g-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><font
color="&#035;000000"><br /></font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-righ
t: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0
px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><font color="&#035;000000">It seem
s like people think of a relationship as competition rather than a partnership,
and that competition damages it. People dont realize theyre supposed to be on th
e same side as their partner. Like my significant other said (and she is the res
erved one) know that you always have the support of your partner, whether they s
how it or not-- its not a competition, trying to get the other person to crack f
irst. Also, women find confident men attractive, so while emotionality is good t
o a certain extent, dont let it make you insecure-- which can be a major problem
and barricade to a healthy and productive relationship. Even rational women lik
e a secure confident guy, because someone who is secure in themselves, also make
s the woman feel secure and confident in him and the relationship. Instead of ar
guing about why your partner is seemingly unemotional (which creates and festers
insecurity on both sides), it would be better to open healthy communication cha
nnels and talk about the specific issues youre really worried about, because I c
an guarantee that if you think they are issues, they do too, and remember they a
re your partner, not your opponent or an object of domination or a mother-figure
, equality is what its all about... I find that emotional men like me want to se
e more emotion in the woman to feel secure she feels about us the same we do, bu
t we need to realize that just because she is reserved, it doesnt mean she cares
any less than we do! Its best to take a step back and take a deep breath when y
ou feel a negative emotional outburst coming on, and know that you might say som
ething you will regret later, and then come back and actually be able to eloquen
tly communicate what the issue is, rather than just the emotions behind it, whic
h your partner will appreciate, because they'll know you care enough about them
to actually bother to tell them whats going on, rather than using them as an emo
tional boxing bag.</font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; m
argin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; paddi
ng-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><font color="&#035;000000"><br /></font></d
iv><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-le
ft: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left
: 0px; "><font color="&#035;000000">I find that I can better analyze my friends'
relationships and help them out more than I can my own sometimes, because I can
maintain a healthy emotional distance (note Im not unemotional, just not emotion
ally extreme, and I do care if my friends' relationships work out), I think it w
ould help alot of us (I know it helped me) to be able to transfer some of this i
nto my own relationship (friends had always commented how great I am at giving a
dvice, why dont I follow it lol), and now that Im starting to, I find myself bec
oming much happier, by being emotional at the right time, and applying logic und
er stressful situations, rather than letting my emotions run rough shod all the
time. Like I said before, a healthy balance of both is preferrable to either ext
reme to make a relationship work and grow. Yes, we all like to romanticize the p
erfect relationship that is out there for us, but the fact is no one is perfect,
so how can a relationship be? It always needs to be worked on and never taken f
or granted and allowed to breathe and grow, as do the individual people who comp
rise it, and then and only then, can you bear the labor of that fruit-- and ther
e's nothing wrong in that, the fact is, like everything in life, you cant gain a
n appreciation of a great relationship unless you work hard at it, and realize i
t takes two people to build it, but only one to tear it down. Its always easier
to tear something down then to build it up and a few short words can hurt someth
ing that took so long to build, so remember that. One thing I can say about a gr
eat relationship is not only do you learn about your partner, you also learn a g
reat deal about yourself. Because, a great relationship not only makes you happy
, it challenges you, to show yourself to be the person you need to be to make it
work. And that's as it should be, the road to everything worthwhile is challeng
ing, but the final goal can not only be emotionally exilirating, but serenely sa
tisfying as well (meaning it can make us happy both emotionally and rationally!)
And the journey towards that goal can be just as exilirating and satisfying as
reaching the final goal (if we ever do, Im of the opinion that a relationship al
ways needs to be nurtured, so there is no final goal... the journey is the thing
!)</font></div></font></font></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530814711'>3
:53 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530814711' i
d='cmtCount_530814711'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_530814711'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount12'
>0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl12_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(530814711);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_530814711" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 530814711);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 530814711);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 530814711);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5308147
11);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 530814711);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 530814711);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 530814711);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53081471
1);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 530814711);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 530814711);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 530814711);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 530814711);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 530814711);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 530814711);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 530814711);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 530814711);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
30814711);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 530814711);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 530814711);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 530814711);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53081471
1);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 530814711);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 530814711);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 530814711);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 530814711
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 530814711);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 530814711);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 530814711);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53081471
1);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 530814711);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 530814711);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 530814711);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 530814711
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 530814711);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 530814711);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 530814711);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 530814711);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 530814711);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 530814711);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 530814711);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 530814711);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=530814711'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=530814711'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
March 6, 2010 - Saturday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_530476169">A new measure of the Multiverse</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_530476169" class="blogContent"><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFo
dHRwOi8vd3d3LnNvdHQubmV0L2FydGljbGVzL3Nob3cvMjA0MDA0LUEtbWVhc3VyZS1mb3ItdGhlLW11
bHRpdmVyc2U=">http://www.sott.net/articles/show/204004-A-measure-for-the-multive
rse</a></div><div><br /></div><div>When cosmologist George Ellis turned 70 last
year, his friends held a party to celebrate. There were speeches and drinks and
canapés aplenty to honour the theorist from the University of Cape Town, South Afr
ica, who is regarded as one of the world's leading experts on general relativity
. But there the similarity to most parties ends. <br /><br />For a start, Ellis'
s celebration at the University of Oxford lasted for three days and the guest li
st was made up entirely of physicists, astronomers and philosophers of science.
They had gathered to debate what Ellis considers the most dangerous idea in scie
nce: the suggestion that our universe is but a tiny part of an unimaginably larg
e and diverse multiverse. <br /><br />To the dismay of Ellis and many of his col
leagues, the multiverse has developed rapidly from a being merely a speculative
idea to a theory verging on respectability. There are good reasons why. Several
strands of theoretical physics - quantum mechanics, string theory and cosmic inf
lation - seem to converge on the idea that our universe is only one among an inf
inite and ever-growing assemblage of disconnected bubble universes. <br /><br />
What's more, the multiverse offers a plausible answer to what has become an infu
riatingly slippery question: why does the quantity of dark energy in the univers
e have the extraordinarily unlikely value that it does? No theory of our univers
e has been able to explain it. But if there are countless universes out there be
yond our cosmic horizon, each with its own value for the quantity of dark energy
it contains, the value we observe becomes not just probable but inevitable. <br
/><br />Despite the many virtues of the multiverse, Ellis is far from alone in
finding it a dangerous idea. The main cause for alarm is the fact that it postul
ates the existence of a multitude of unobservable universes, making the whole id
ea untestable. If something as fundamental as this is untestable, says Ellis, th
e foundations of science itself are undermined. <br /><br />Comparing infinities
<br /><br />One of the guests at Ellis's party doesn't see it that way. Raphael
Bousso of the University of California, Berkeley, has also been grappling with
the multiverse, and in the past few months he has found a way round the troublin
g problem of unobservable universes. At a stroke, he has transformed the multive
rse from a theory so problematical that it threatens to subvert science, into on
e that promises predictions we can test. His insights are steering physicists al
ong the path to their ultimate goal of uniting quantum mechanics and gravity int
o one neat theory of everything. <br /><br />Bousso's achievement is all the mor
e impressive because he has succeed where so many others have tried and failed.
The problem they all encountered boils down to this: like quantum mechanics and
thermodynamics, multiverse cosmology is an exercise in statistics. Given a unive
rse within the multiverse, you cannot predict what its key characteristics will
be - how much dark energy it contains, say. The best you can do is calculate the
probability that it looks the way it does based on how likely it is that a univ
erse with its particular set of characteristics will occur in the multiverse. Ca
lculating probabilities, though, requires a "measure" - a mathematical tool that
tells you how to define relative probabilities. And finding the right measure f
or the multiverse is far from easy. <br /><br />The trouble is that in an infini
te multiverse, everything that can happen will happen - an infinite number of ti
mes. In such a set-up, probability loses all meaning. "How do you compare infini
ties?" asks Andrei Linde of Stanford University in California. <br />Everything
that can happen will happen in the multiverse - an infinite number of times. <br
/>Prior to Bousso's work, the favoured approach was to pick a snapshot of the m
ultiverse at a particular time and calculate the characteristics of all the bubb
le universes inside, noting how many different values for the amount of dark ene
rgy crop up. From there, you extrapolate the relative probabilities to the multi
verse as it develops over time with its infinite number of bubble universes. <br
/><br />Unfortunately, there's a nasty hole in this approach, in the shape of t
he phrase "at some particular time": according to Einstein's theory of relativit
y, it renders the whole exercise utterly meaningless. The problem arises from Ei
nstein's insight that clocks run differently for different observers. Two events
that are simultaneous for me are not simultaneous for you, so there are an infi
nite number of ways you can slice up the multiverse. None is more "true" than an
y other, so there's no reason to choose one time slicing over another - and diff
erent slices can yield dramatically different results. <br /><br />Implicit in p
revious approaches was the idea that the multiverse can be described from an obs
erverless, God's-eye-view, and Bousso realised that this was what lead to all th
ose intractable infinities. So he decided to calculate probabilities based on wh
at any one observer can see from within their own universe. <br /><br />Quantum
mechanics tells us that the vacuum of space is not empty; instead, it crackles w
ith energy. It also tells us that, sooner or later, any given universe will deca
y spontaneously into another one with lower energy. Indeed, most cosmologists en
visage our big bang as precisely such an event, during which the vacuum we live
in emerged from a higher-energy vacuum that constituted a universe before ours.
What matters here, though, is that there are a plethora of possible universes th
at can be produced in this way - each one with its own probability. By adding up
these probabilities, Bousso was able to work out the various probabilities of t
he observer ending up in a universe with a particular set of characteristics. <b
r /><br />Using this approach, Bousso was able to derive probabilities for thing
s like the amount of dark energy in any particular universe, without ever have t
o resort to a God's-eye point of view, or speculation about what might be happen
ing in disconnected bubble universes beyond our view. He calls this approach the
causal patch measure, and the important thing is that it works. He has used it
to predict the value of the dark energy we ought to see in our own universe, and
it turns out to be remarkably close to the observed value. <br /><br />So, job
done? Not quite. The problem with the causal patch measure is that the result de
pends on the vacuum energy of the universe the calculation starts with. And such
arbitrariness is anathema to physicists. <br /><br />A hologram of the multiver
se <br /><br />While Bousso was working on his observer's-eye view of the multiv
erse, cosmologist Alexander Vilenkin of Tufts University in Boston was formulati
ng another approach to the global picture. Vilenkin, too, had become dissatisfie
d with past approaches to measure making, and had decided there had to be a bett
er way. Together with Jaume Garriga of the University of Barcelona in Spain, Vil
enkin thought there might be some clues in an earlier breakthrough made by Argen
tinean physicist Juan Maldacena at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton
. <br /><br />Maldacena had been working with string theory to build model unive
rses when he made a startling discovery. He found a model in a bizarrely shaped
universe with five dimensions that is exactly equivalent to a simpler model on i
ts four-dimensional boundary. This is a classic example of what is known as the
"holographic principle", the idea that for a space in any number of dimensions,
all the physics inside that space can be encoded on its outer boundary in much t
he same way that a two-dimensional hologram on a credit card can encode all the
information about a 3D object. <br /><br />Vilenkin and Garriga figured the enti
re multiverse must similarly have a holographic image living on its boundary. In
the case of the multiverse, though, the boundary is not a frontier in space, bu
t in time, infinitely far into the future. Could it hold a uniquely defined meas
ure for the multiverse? <br /><br />Bousso was intrigued. While he believed his
causal patch measure was more promising, he decided to see what would happen if
he tried to derive a measure for the multiverse by studying its boundary instead
. "I wanted to figure out a straightforward way of transferring what we had lear
ned from Maldacena to the multiverse," he says. <br /><br />It turns out that zo
oming in on part of the boundary is equivalent to selecting different, finite sl
ices of time in the interior of the multiverse (see diagram). To see how it work
s, imagine you are standing in a dark room with your back against one wall and f
acing another wall. You switch on a flashlight, which illuminates a large oval o
n the far wall. As you walk towards the wall ahead, the illuminated oval shrinks
. The further away you move from the back wall where you started, the smaller th
e area of illumination becomes. In other words, there is a clear relationship be
tween areas on your future boundary and distance from your starting point. In a
similar way, a particular area on the boundary of the multiverse is associated w
ith a particular time inside it. <br /><br />What is so powerful about this appr
oach is that it sidesteps the problem Einstein raised about time being relative
to different observers. Here the boundary tells you which bubble universes exist
ed at a particular time. Knowing this, you can start comparing universes and cal
culating the probability of finding one with a particular value of dark energy,
for instance. <br /><br />As Bousso studied this measure, something astonishing
came into focus. The global measure he had discovered using the holographic repr
esentation of the multiverse and its future boundary turns out to be exactly equ
ivalent to the causal patch measure he had already derived by simply considering
what a single observer can see. The two dramatically different approaches turne
d out to be two different ways of looking at the same underlying reality: one co
nsiders an ensemble of possible histories for a single observer; the other, the
entire infinite history of an infinite number of disconnected bubble universes.
<br /><br />"That was really stunning," says Bousso. "It was amazing to me when
I realised that the two measures reproduce the exact same probabilities." <br />
<br />Their equivalence turns out to be extremely useful, as weaknesses in one m
easure are strengths in the other, and vice versa. "They are like two people on
crutches holding one another up," Bousso says. <br /><br />So while in the causa
l patch measure your answers depend strongly on the universe in which your obser
vers start out, the global measure does not suffer from this ambiguity. In the m
ultiverse, bubbles beget bubbles beget bubbles, so that initial conditions are q
uickly lost in the crowd and no longer matter when it comes to calculating proba
bilities. In fact the global picture actually defines what the starting vacuum f
or the causal patch approach should be. <br /><br />On the other hand, while the
global picture suffers from the problem of "duplicate information" (see "What b
lack holes can teach us"), Bousso's causal patch measure successfully circumvent
s this. <br /><br />The implications might be immense. The two equivalent measur
es have not only provided a prediction for dark energy in our own universe that
closely matches observations, they were both inspired in different ways by the h
olographic principle. This suggests that the holographic principle is profoundly
significant, and could lead us to a theory of quantum gravity - the long-sought
theory of everything that mirrors the dynamics of the multiverse. "By thinking
about the measure problem, we seem to be learning, perhaps unexpectedly, about a
nother, equally deep mystery, namely how to formulate the quantum gravity theory
of the multiverse," says Bousso. <br />We are learning how to formulate a quant
um gravity theory of the multiverse. <br />Even Ellis is impressed by Bousso's r
esults, if not exactly sold on the multiverse. "It is a useful and intriguing ki
nd of consistency test based in fascinating but speculative physics," he says. A
nd there is another far-reaching consequence. If Bousso's equivalence holds, the
n not only can the resulting measure be used to make real, testable predictions,
they can also make calculations in the multiverse without ever referring to uno
bservable universes lurking beyond our cosmic horizon. Everything we need to kno
w about the multiverse might be right here in our own universe.<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnNvdHQubmV0L2
ltYWdlL2ltYWdlL3MxLzMzODczL2Z1bGwvMjc1MDExMDEuanBn">http://www.sott.net/image/im
age/s1/33873/full/27501101.jpg</a><br /><a><img width="325" src="http://c3.ac-im
ages.myspacecdn.com/images02/117/l_94e186a97b234f2b8825169da2aec932.jpg" /></a>
<br /><br /></div></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530476169'>8
:57 PM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530476169' i
d='cmtCount_530476169'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_530476169'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount13'
>0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl13_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(530476169);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_530476169" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 530476169);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 530476169);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 530476169);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5304761
69);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 530476169);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 530476169);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 530476169);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53047616
9);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 530476169);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 530476169);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 530476169);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 530476169);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 530476169);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 530476169);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 530476169);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 530476169);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
30476169);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 530476169);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 530476169);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 530476169);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53047616
9);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 530476169);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 530476169);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 530476169);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 530476169
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 530476169);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 530476169);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 530476169);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53047616
9);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 530476169);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 530476169);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 530476169);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 530476169
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 530476169);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 530476169);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 530476169);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 530476169);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 530476169);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 530476169);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 530476169);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 530476169);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=530476169'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=530476169'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
March 6, 2010 - Saturday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_530475927">7 Theories of Everything</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_530475927" class="blogContent"><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFo
dHRwOi8vd3d3Lm5ld3NjaWVudGlzdC5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS9kbjE4NjEyLWtub3dpbmctdGhlLW1pbmQt
b2YtZ29kLXNldmVuLXRoZW9yaWVzLW9mLWV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcuaHRtbD9mdWxsPXRydWU=">http://www
.newscientist.com/article/dn18612-knowing-the-mind-of-god-seven-theories-of-ever
ything.html?full=true</a></div><div><br /></div><div>The "theory of everything"
is one of the most cherished dreams of science. If it is ever discovered, it wil
l describe the workings of the universe at the most fundamental level and thus e
ncompass our entire understanding of nature. It would also answer such enduring
puzzles as what dark matter is, the reason time flows in only one direction and
how gravity works. Small wonder that Stephen Hawking famously said that such a t
heory would be "the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the
mind of God".<br /><br />But theologians needn't lose too much sleep just yet.
Despite decades of effort, progress has been slow. Rather than one or two rival
theories whose merits can be judged against the evidence, there is a profusion o
f candidates and precious few clues as to which (if any) might turn out to be co
rrect.<br /><br />Here's a brief guide to some of the front runners.<br />String
theory<br /><br />This is probably the best known theory of everything, and the
most heavily studied. It suggests that the fundamental particles we observe are
not actually particles at all, but tiny strings that only "look" like particles
to scientific instruments because they are so small.<br /><br />What's more, th
e mathematics of string theory also rely on extra spatial dimensions, which huma
ns could not experience directly.<br /><br />These are radical suggestions, but
many theorists find the string approach elegant and have proposed numerous varia
tions on the basic theme that seem to solve assorted cosmological conundrums. Ho
wever, they have two major challenges to overcome if they are to persuade the re
st of the scientific community that string theory is the best candidate for a To
E.<br /><br />First, string theorists have so far struggled to make new predicti
ons that can be tested. So string theory remains just that: a theory.<br /><br /
>Secondly, there are just too many variants of the theory, any one of which coul
d be correct – and little to choose between them. To resolve this, some physicists
have proposed a more general framework called M-theory, which unifies many stri
ng theories.<br /><br />But this has its own problems. Depending how you set it
up, M-theory can describe any of 10500 universes. Some physicists argue that thi
s is evidence that there are multiple universes, but others think it just means
the theory is untestable.<br />Loop quantum gravity<br /><br />Although it hasn'
t had the same media exposure, loop quantum gravity is so far the only real riva
l to string theory.<br /><br />The basic idea is that space is not continuous, a
s we usually think, but is instead broken up into tiny chunks 10-35 metres acros
s. These are then connected by links to make the space we experience. When these
links are tangled up into braids and knots, they produce elementary particles.<
br /><br />Loop quantum gravity has produced some tentative predictions of real-
world effects, and has also shed some light on the birth of the universe. But it
s proponents have so far struggled to incorporate gravity into their theories. A
nd as with string theory, a true experimental test is still some way off.<br />C
DT<br /><br />Causal dynamical triangulations looks pretty similar to loop quant
um gravity at first glance. Just as loop quantum gravity breaks up space into ti
ny "building blocks", CDT assumes that space-time is split into tiny building bl
ocks – this time, four-dimensional chunks called pentachorons.<br /><br />The pent
achorons can then be glued together to produce a large-scale universe – which turn
s out to have three space dimensions and one time dimension, just as the real on
e does. So far, so good, but there's a major drawback: CDT as it currently stand
s cannot explain the existence of matter.<br />Quantum Einstein gravity<br /><br
/>This idea, proposed by Martin Reuter of the University of Mainz, Germany, tak
es a rather different tack.<br /><br />Part of the problem with unifying gravity
and quantum mechanics is what happens to gravity at small scales. The closer tw
o objects are to each other, the stronger the gravitational attraction between t
hem; but gravity also acts on itself, and as a result, at very small distances a
feedback loop starts. According to conventional theories the force should then
become ridiculously strong – which means there's something wrong with the conventi
onal theories.<br /><br />However, Reuter has come up with a way to generate a "
fixed point": a distance below which gravity stops getting stronger. This could
help solve the problem, and lead to a quantum theory of gravity.<br />Quantum gr
aphity<br /><br />All the theories above assume that space and time exist, and t
hen try to build up the rest of the universe. Quantum graphity – the brainchild of
Fotini Markopoulou of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterl
oo, Ontario, Canada, and colleagues – tries to do away with them.<br /><br />When
the universe formed in the big bang, Markopoulou says, there was no such thing a
s space as we know it. Instead, there was an abstract network of "nodes" of spac
e, in which each node was connected to every other. Very soon afterwards, this n
etwork collapsed and some of the nodes broke away from each other, forming the l
arge universe we see today.<br />Internal relativity<br /><br />Developed by Ola
f Dreyer of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, internal relativity sets
out to explain how general relativity could arise in a quantum world.<br /><br /
>Every particle in the universe has a property called "spin", which can be loose
ly thought of as what happens to the particle when it is rotated. Dreyer's model
imagines a system of spins existing independently of matter and arranged random
ly. When the system reaches a critical temperature, the spins align, forming an
ordered pattern.<br /><br />Anyone actually living in the system of spins will n
ot see them. All they see are their effects, which Dreyer has shown will include
space-time and matter. He has also managed to derive Newtonian gravity from the
model: however, general relativity has not yet emerged.<br />E8<br /><br />In 2
007 the physicist (and sometime surfer) Garrett Lisi made headlines with a possi
ble theory of everything.<br /><br />The fuss was triggered by a paper discussin
g E8, a complex eight-dimensional mathematical pattern with 248 points. Lisi sho
wed that the various fundamental particles and forces known to physics could be
placed on the points of the E8 pattern, and that many of their interactions then
emerged naturally.<br /><br />Some physicists heavily criticised the paper, whi
le others gave it a cautious welcome. In late 2008, Lisi was given a grant to co
ntinue his studies of E8.<br /></div></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530475927'>8
:54 PM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530475927' i
d='cmtCount_530475927'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_530475927'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount14'
>0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl14_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(530475927);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_530475927" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 530475927);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 530475927);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 530475927);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5304759
27);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 530475927);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 530475927);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 530475927);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53047592
7);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 530475927);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 530475927);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 530475927);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 530475927);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 530475927);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 530475927);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 530475927);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 530475927);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
30475927);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 530475927);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 530475927);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 530475927);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53047592
7);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 530475927);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 530475927);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 530475927);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 530475927
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 530475927);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 530475927);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 530475927);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53047592
7);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 530475927);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 530475927);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 530475927);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 530475927
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 530475927);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 530475927);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 530475927);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 530475927);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 530475927);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 530475927);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 530475927);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 530475927);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=530475927'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=530475927'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="padding:10px">
<div class="blogTimeStamp">
March 2, 2010 - Tuesday&nbsp;
</div>
<table class="blog" width="100%" border=
"0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr>
<td width="30"><img heig
ht="1" border="0" width="30" alt="" src="http://x.myspace.com/images/spacer.gif"
/></td>
<td>
<!--- blog subje
ct --->
<div class="blog
Subject">
<label i
d="pBlogSubject_530178826">Physicists on Time Travel</label>

</div>
<!--- blog body --->
<div id="pBl
ogBody_530178826" class="blogContent"><div>Hour 1 Parts 1-5</div><div><br /></di
v><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNo
P3Y9aFNfdVBCSkJ6Q3c=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hS_uPBJBzCw</a></div><div><
br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29
tL3dhdGNoP3Y9enE4c3prTU1xODA=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq8szkMMq80</a></d
iv><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdX
R1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9c0tGZmJjX0NPQWs=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKFfbc_CO
Ak</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd
3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9Z3A4cHhnQXZZRGc=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
gp8pxgAvYDg</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFo
dHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9RWJySGhJRlhjN3c=">http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=EbrHhIFXc7w</a></div><div><br /></div><div>Hour 2 Parts 1-5</div><div><
br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29
tL3dhdGNoP3Y9b1c3UWZwZVpoSlE=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW7QfpeZhJQ</a></d
iv><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdX
R1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9cDZuNUp3WGdoeVE=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6n5JwXgh
yQ</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd
3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9X05NSVh0VGlJdWc=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
_NMIXtTiIug</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFo
dHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9cjY0ZExtZHYtTDQ=">http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=r64dLmdv-L4</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks
.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9YldLV1dQcUdCU0k=">http://www.yo
utube.com/watch?v=bWKWWPqGBSI</a></div><div><br /></div><div>Hour 3 Parts 1-5</d
iv><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdX
R1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9NlFNSDJfNlU3WUE=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QMH2_6U7
YA</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd
3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9a2hBdDB4TXhNWnc=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
khAt0xMxMZw</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFo
dHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9UlFtVUllRFRYUTA=">http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=RQmUIeDTXQ0</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks
.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9VGd4Mlg2NkVoOEE=">http://www.yo
utube.com/watch?v=Tgx2X66Eh8A</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www
.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9UEN1b3E1TTlKMWc=">http
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCuoq5M9J1g</a></div><div><br /></div><div>Hour 4 Par
ts 1-4</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd
3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9M0RvMmFaNFdpN0E=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
3Do2aZ4Wi7A</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFo
dHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9SDNGOV9IWlNSNkE=">http://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=H3F9_HZSR6A</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks
.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9cEluSnJ2eEp2RGM=">http://www.yo
utube.com/watch?v=pInJrvxJvDc</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www
.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9RURCbXJsdkVfY28=">http
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDBmrlvE_co</a></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></di
v><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Key points from the interview:<br /><br
/>- Time travel - not "if", but "how"<br />- Energy in universe expands and tra
nsforms, constantly. This has major implications on what we perceive as an after
life. <br />- 1998 - critical period in the time travel time line.. ?<br />- Unl
imited energy source has been found<br />- India is the world leader in time tra
vel technology. <br /><br />Intuitive thoughts I had on this interview:<br /><br
/>Positive<br /><br />- Very intelligent guy. Seems to have thought of everythi
ng from a Philosophical standpoint (he does have a degree in Philosophy). <br />
- Excellent presenter. Dr. Anderson's voice does not convey hype, but constantly
keeps the audience interested. <br />- Seems to have broken the evolutionary ba
rrier in several different levels of intuitive thought. Once these barriers are
breached, there is no limit on human accomplishment. <br /><br />Negative<br /><
br />- The obvious: Why do this public interview if the government and special i
nterest groups are so interested in keeping the technology secretive?<br />- For
someone that has "lost everything", and "could not be at a lower point in life"
, he sure doesn't sound like it. but that could be a product of high auditory in
telligence, and/or a complete separation of Thinking-Feeling (which is actually
pretty common among societies elite). <br /><br />Some background on Dr. David A
nderson:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LmFuZGVyc29
uaQ==">http://www.andersoni</a>....biography.html<br /><br />David Lewis Anderso
n, born in Weirton, West Virginia is a physicist whose interests are in spacetim
e physics, special relativity and global community service. Anderson received de
grees in engineering, physics and philosophy as a student graduating with honors
from West Virginia University, California State University, the Joint-Services
Military College and the University of Minnesota.<br /><br />He was employed at
a young age by the United States Air Force conducting advanced research and deve
lopment at the prestigious Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards Air Force Bas
e in the Mojave Desert. He later founded an organization call the TTRC, an advan
ced time-technology research laboratory located on Long Island, New York in the
United States of America.<br /><br />During that time he proposed several new de
tail on theories for reversing time at sub-light speeds and laid the foundations
for what would later become known as time-warped field theory, an approach that
modeled and described how to use the natural forces of inertial frame dragging
for power generation and to create contained and controllable fields of closed t
ime-like curves.<br /><br />Anderson provided one of the first comprehensive ove
rviews of the historical views of time, time control and time travel in the docu
mentary "Time Travel - Journeys into Time" His ideas were later applied for the
development of high performance time reactor] systems for energy production and
time technology research at what is known today as the Anderson Institute.<br />
<br />Anderson is the President and CEO of Anderson Multinational LLC, the paren
t corporation of the Anderson Institute and several other companies, headquarter
ed in Rochester, New York. He holds multiple patents relating to time technology
and also for time reactor designs. His published works include more than thirty
articles and video lectures on spacetime physics, time control technologies and
methods and the philosophy of time. He has appeared on numerous radio and telev
ision shows worldwide including Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell in the USA.<br /
><br />Anderson is also President and CEO of the World Genesis Foundation whose
mission is to “leave no child without hope for the future” and is active as a speake
r and Ambassador for Youth for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cu
ltural Organization.<br /><br />Do a search on "Project Pegasus", "DARPA", and "
Dr. David Anderson".. for further information on the validity of his work. <br /
><br />Albert Einstein theorized that time travel is possibly per the Laws of Ph
ysics. His theory of special relativity describes this in a mathematical formula
. <br /><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LmV2ZXJ5dGhpbg==">http:
//www.everythin</a>...om/einstein.htm<br /><br />Thoughts? At first I dismissed
the theory, but upon further research, everything checks out and looks legit. Th
is guy is a well known, very well respected scientist. The theory of time travel
has always been deemed possible by the worlds highest achieving Physicists. It'
s human nature to deny that which we don't understand, but history says yes, thi
s is not only possible, but a probable discovery. Think of planes, cars, nuclear
bombs, Iphones, etc... from the point of view of people living in the 1800s. <b
r /><br />My personal opinion is that time travel as described by Dr. Anderson i
s more than likely happening than not.<br /><br />One more thing: Shortly after
the Dr. Anderson interview, another well respected Physicist came out saying the
same things.<br /><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3LmV4YW1pbmVy
">http://www.examiner</a>....-of-time-travel<br /><br />More: <a href="http://ww
w.msplinks.com/MDFodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmhvd3N0dWZmdw==">http://www.howstuffw</a>...time
-travel.htm<br /></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.msplinks.com/MD
FodHRwOi8vd3d3LmFuZGVyc29uaW5zdGl0dXRlLmNvbS9pbWFnZXMvdGltZS1jb250cm9sLXRlY2hub2
xvZ2llcy1hbmQtbWV0aG9kcy5qcGc=">http://www.andersoninstitute.com/images/time-con
trol-technologies-and-methods.jpg</a></div><div><br /></div><div><br /><a><img w
idth="325" src="http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/121/l_15b06c25d0c541
41b0afcde1f65ca14c.jpg" /></a> <br /><br /><br /></div><div><br /></div></div>
<!--- blogger's
current book/movie/music/games --->
<div class="blogContentInfo">
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530178826'>1
:24 AM</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a href='http://blogs.m
yspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=415169779&blogId=530178826' i
d='cmtCount_530178826'>0&nbsp;Comments</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">(<a href='#' id='addCmt
Lnk_530178826'>Add Comment</a>)&nbsp;|</div>
<div class="cmtcell"><label id='KudoCount15'
>0&nbsp;Kudos</label></div>
<div class="cmtcell"></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMa
in_cpMain_BlogList_RepeaterBlogList_ctl15_btnTranslate" href="javascript:showLan
guageOptions(530178826);">Translate</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell"><div id="languageOption
s_530178826" style="display:none" class="googleTranslateLayer blog"><table borde
r="0" class="blog"><tr><td><div class="googletranslate">Powered by<br/><img src=
"http://x.myspacecdn.com/modules/blogv2/static/img/google_logo.png" alt="Google
Translate" /></div></td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('en', 530178826);" />English</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void
(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sq', 530178826);" />Albanian</td></tr><tr><td><a h
ref="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ar', 530178826);" />Arabic</td
></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('bg', 5301788
26);" />Bulgarian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('ca', 530178826);" />Catalan</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('zh', 530178826);" />Chinese</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hr', 530178826);" />Croatian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('cs', 53017882
6);" />Czech</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBl
og('da', 530178826);" />Danish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" on
click="translateBlog('nl', 530178826);" />Dutch</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javasc
ript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('et', 530178826);" />Estonian</td></tr><tr
><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('tl', 530178826);" />F
ilipino</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('f
i', 530178826);" />Finnish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('fr', 530178826);" />French</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascrip
t:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('gl', 530178826);" />Galician</td></tr><tr><t
d><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('de', 530178826);" />Germ
an</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('el', 5
30178826);" />Greek</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="tran
slateBlog('iw', 530178826);" />Hebrew</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(
0);" onclick="translateBlog('hi', 530178826);" />Hindi</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('hu', 530178826);" />Hungarian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('id', 53017882
6);" />Indonesian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="transl
ateBlog('it', 530178826);" />Italian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0
);" onclick="translateBlog('ja', 530178826);" />Japanese</td></tr><tr><td><a hre
f="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ko', 530178826);" />Korean</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('lv', 530178826
);" />Latvian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('lt', 530178826);" />Lithuanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('mt', 530178826);" />Maltese</td></tr><tr><td><a href=
"javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('no', 530178826);" />Norwegian</td>
</tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('pl', 53017882
6);" />Polish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('pt', 530178826);" />Portuguese</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0)
;" onclick="translateBlog('ro', 530178826);" />Romanian</td></tr><tr><td><a href
="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('ru', 530178826);" />Russian</td><
/tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sr', 530178826
);" />Serbian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateB
log('sk', 530178826);" />Slovak</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" o
nclick="translateBlog('sl', 530178826);" />Slovenian</td></tr><tr><td><a href="j
avascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('es', 530178826);" />Spanish</td></tr
><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('sv', 530178826);"
/>Swedish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog
('th', 530178826);" />Thai</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclic
k="translateBlog('tr', 530178826);" />Turkish</td></tr><tr><td><a href="javascri
pt:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('uk', 530178826);" />Ukrainian</td></tr><tr>
<td><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="translateBlog('vi', 530178826);" />Vi
etnamese</td></tr></table></div></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.edit&editor=True&blogId=530178826'>Ed
it</a></div>
<div class="cmtcell">&nbsp;<a href='http://b
logs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.Confirm&action=blog&friendId=0&blogId
=530178826'>Remove</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="spacer">
<td></td>
</tr>

</table>
<div style="font-size:12px;padding-top:5px;float:left;">
<a id="ctl00_ctl00_cpMain_cpMain_BlogList_btnOlder" href="http://www.myspace
.com/_-_-_super-man_-_-_/blog?page=2">Older Posts</a>

</div>

<script type="text/javascript">
MySpace.Application.add_DOMloaded(function(){
var a = document.getElementsByTagName('A');
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++)
{
if(a[i].id != null)
{
if(a[i].id.indexOf('addCmtLnk_') > -1)
{
var postId = a[i].id.substring(10);
$addHandler($get(a[i].id), "click", Function.createPartial(n
ull, openCommentPopup, postId));
}
}
}
});
var commentPopup=null;
function openCommentPopup(postId, evt){
evt.preventDefault();
MySpace.UI.addQuickPostScript(function(){
commentPopup=$create(MySpace.UI.QuickPostPopup, {
webServiceUrl: "/Modules/BlogV2/Services/Comment
WS.asmx",
webServiceParams: {blogId: postId, commentId: 0,
friendId: 415169779 }
});
commentPopup.add_success(onCommentPostedPopupAjax);
commentPopup.show();
});
}
function onCommentPostedPopupAjax(popup, eventArgs){
postPopupHandler(eventArgs.data);
}

</script>
</module>
<script>
if(document.URL.indexOf("http://blogs.myspace.com/musicblog", 0) >= 0)
{
window.location = "http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blo
g.ListAll&vanity=musicblog";
}
</script>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>

</form>

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center" border="0">


<tr>
<td align="center"><span id="ctl00_ctl00_cpFooter_cpFooter_Foote
rContent"></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><!-- Footer:Standard Start -->
<style>
div#googleLogo_Footer{
height:24px !important;
}
</style><div id="footer"><br />
<a class="text" href="http://faq.myspace.com/app/home" target="_blank" onclick="
MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20955')">Help</a> |
<a class="text" href="http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=misc.terms" ta
rget="_blank" rel="nofollow" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bdc6
-02a34ab8e4ad','20956')">Terms</a> |
<a class="text" href="http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=misc.privacy"
target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bd
c6-02a34ab8e4ad','20957')">Privacy Policy</a> |
<a class="text" href="http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=cms.viewpage&a
mp;placement=safety_pagehome" target="_blank" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec0
7d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20958')">Safety Tips</a> |
<span class="disabled"><a class="text" href="http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu
seaction=help.reportabuse&amp;abusetype=profile&amp;ProfileContentID=" target="_
blank" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','32537'
)">Report Abuse</a> |</span>
<a class="text" href="https://advertise.myspace.com/login.html?adv=gf.1&pr=d3oat
dQsvADw%2BazsdI%2Fi0A%3D%3D" target="_blank" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07
d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20959')">Advertise</a> |
<a class="text" href="http://developer.myspace.com" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('
0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20960')">Developers</a> |
<a class="text" id="intlLink1" href="http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction
=InternationalMap" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e
4ad','20961')">MySpace International</a>
<span id="msLatino">| <a class="text" href="http://latino.myspace.com" onclick="
MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20962')">MySpace Latin
o</a></span>
<br/>
<p>
<a href="http://www.myspace.com/careers" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-11
16-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','63883')">Careers</a> |
<a href="http://www.myspace.com/pressroom" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-
1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','32538')">Press Room</a> |
<a href="http://music.myspace.com" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-484
1-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20963')">Music</a> | <a href="http://vids.myspace.com" onc
lick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec07d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20964')">Video</
a> | <a href="http://www.myspace.com/sitemap" onclick="MySpace.CMS.track('0a1ec0
7d-1116-4841-bdc6-02a34ab8e4ad','20968')">Sitemap</a>
</p><br /><br /><div class="clear">&copy;2003-2010 MySpace, Inc. All Rights Rese
rved.</div><style type="text/css"><!--
#internationalLinks div.intlColumn { float: left; padding-left: 15px; width: 180
px; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis;}
--></style>
<div id="internationalLinks" style="height: 510px; margin-top: -510px;">
<div class="closer"><a href="javascript:msglobalnav.toggleInternationalLinks();"
>Close</a></div>
<div class="intlColumn"><div class="header">Americas</div>
<ul class="bottomMargin">
<li><a href="http://ar.myspace.com/">Argentina</a></li>
<li><a href="http://br.myspace.com/">Brazil</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ca.myspace.com/">Canada </a></li>
<li><a href="http://cf.myspace.com/">Canada (Français)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://la.myspace.com/">Latin America (Español)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mx.myspace.com/">Mexico</a></li>
<li><a href="http://us.myspace.com/">United States (English)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://latino.myspace.com/">United States (Latino)</a></li>
</ul><div class="header">Asia Pacific</div>
<ul><li><a href="http://au.myspace.com/">Australia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://zh.myspace.com/">Chinese (Traditional)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://in.myspace.com/">India</a></li>
<li><a href="http://jp.myspace.com/">Japan</a></li>
<li><a href="http://nz.myspace.com/">New Zealand</a></li>
</ul></div>
<div class="intlColumn"><div class="header">Europe</div>
<ul><li><a href="http://at.myspace.com/">Austria</a></li>
<li><a href="http://belgie.myspace.com/">Belgium (Nederlands)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://belgique.myspace.com/">Belgium (Français)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://dk.myspace.com/">Denmark</a></li>
<li><a href="http://fi.myspace.com/">Finland</a></li>
<li><a href="http://fr.myspace.com/">France</a></li>
<li><a href="http://de.myspace.com/">Germany</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gr.myspace.com/">Greece</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ie.myspace.com/">Ireland</a></li>
<li><a href="http://it.myspace.com/">Italy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://nl.myspace.com/">Netherlands</a></li>
<li><a href="http://no.myspace.com/">Norway</a></li>
<li><a href="http://pt.myspace.com/">Portugal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://pl.myspace.com/">Poland</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ru.myspace.com/">Russia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://es.myspace.com/">Spain</a></li>
<li><a href="http://se.myspace.com/">Sweden</a></li>
<li><a href="http://schweiz.myspace.com/">Switzerland (Deutsch)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://suisse.myspace.com/">Switzerland (Français)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://svizzera.myspace.com/">Switzerland (Italiano)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://tr.myspace.com/">Turkey</a></li>
<li><a href="http://uk.myspace.com/">UK</a></li>
</ul></div></div></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "htt
p://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.
js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-6293770-1");
pageTracker._setSampleRate("1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}
</script>
<!-- Footer:Standard End -->
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<style type="text/css">
#footer {background-color:Transparent;}
body {line-height:1.2;}
</style>

<script type="text/javascript">(function(){function r(n,p){n.__namespace


=true;n.__typeName=p;n.getName=function(){return this.__typeName;};}function m(o
,p){for(var k in p)o[k]=p[k];}function p(a,e){a.push.apply(a,e);}m(MySpace.defer
redScripts=MySpace.deferredScripts||{},{"quickpost.js":{"url":"http://js.myspace
cdn.com/modules/common/static/js/atlas/quickpost_ujzxjul0.js","test":"MySpace.UI
._QuickPostControl"},"richtexteditor.js":{"url":"http://js.myspacecdn.com/module
s/common/static/js/atlas/richtexteditor_uvm5sqtf.js","test":"punymce.Editor"},"t
racking/tynt.js":{"url":"http://js.myspacecdn.com/modules/common/static/js/jquer
y/tracking/tynt_zcvgeagv.js?user=bjNOt4bfyr35kFadbiUt4I&lang=en","test":"startTy
ntApp"}});MySpace.UI=MySpace.UI||{};r(MySpace.UI,'MySpace.UI');MySpace.UI._Quick
Post=MySpace.UI._QuickPost||{};r(MySpace.UI._QuickPost,'MySpace.UI._QuickPost');
MySpace.UI._QuickPost.hashToken="MIGmBgkrBgEEAYI3WAOggZgwgZUGCisGAQQBgjdYAwGggYY
wgYMCAwIAAQICZgMCAgDABAh7j6uoaFvMdwQQKk92JzbVsObJ4fTXoZP%2fewRYPN3m9X4iMcc4GibPw
pApYVckp3k%2bxF2u9o8U8JY%2b8nae7uEV%2bHqPL88s154DQovksRILIbo7Vx93TawVBADKcST0RgJ
AUPas2VKiiIEpJCBaQtfWpaDZug%3d%3d";MySpace.UI._QuickPost.rte=true;MySpace.UI._Up
loadControlHashToken="MIGuBgkrBgEEAYI3WAOggaAwgZ0GCisGAQQBgjdYAwGggY4wgYsCAwIAAQ
ICZgMCAgDABAiAHyNqRFB%2bzQQQBuAC%2f5HKvZj6u2CG6lukwQRgJw17gb0b5HUyV8GLD0NFHAzeAt
M9UYg0JvNT9PcFHXnWxuyguh20b4daiXGDg%2bwe0QQNcJnVXL9n3rEEaJvQ3yHjubwm50cAwQE9IZ8R
RD3t8PfyshzO52cSgPrZaCSB";tyntVariables=window.tyntVariables||{};r(tyntVariables
,'tyntVariables');tyntVariables.ap="Read more: ";})();</script>

<script type="text/javascript">
MySpace.IsBeaconHeatMapEnabled = true;
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://js.myspacecdn.com/modules/co
mmon/static/js/atlas/global_au0lo0p8.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
function google_ad_request_done(google_ads)
{
var i = 0;
if (google_ads == null || google_ads.length == 0) return;
var ctl = null;
var str = '';
ctl = document.getElementById("googleAdDefaultDiv");
if (ctl != null)
{
str = '';
document.write('<STYLE type=text/css> div.googleafs, div.googlea
fc { -x-system-font:none; font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:11.0
222px; font-size-adjust:none; font-stretch:normal; font-style:normal; font-varia
nt:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:normal; } div.googleafs, div.googleaf
s a:hover, div.googleafs *, div.googleafc, div.googleafc a:hover, div.googleafc
* { font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none; } div.googlehdr { color:#777976; t
ext-align:right; } div.googleafs p, div.googleafc p { color:#000000; display:blo
ck; } div.googleafs span, div.googleafc span { color:#017F02; display:block; } d
iv.googleafs strong, div.googleafc strong { color:#0401CE; display:block; font-w
eight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } div.googleafs, div.googleafs *, div.goo
gleafc, div.googleafc * { margin:0pt; padding:0pt; } div.googleafc a { display:b
lock; margin:0pt; padding:3px 12px 7px; } div.googleafs { background:#E4ECF9 non
e repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow:hidden; } div.googleafs div.googlehdr { margin:-
2px; padding-right:9px; } div.googleafc { background:transparent none repeat scr
oll 0% 0%; height:auto; margin:10px 0pt; overflow:hidden; } div.googleafc div.go
oglehdr { border-bottom:1px solid #A5A5A5; color:#000000; margin:0pt 0pt 10px; p
adding:0pt; } div.googleafc div.horz { padding-bottom:5px; } div.googleafc div.h
orz a { float:left; padding:0pt 12px 0pt 0pt; width:23%; } div.googleafc div.adc
ount1, div.googleafc div.adcount1 a * { text-align:center; } div.googleafc div.a
dcount1 a { float:none !important; padding:0pt 10px; width:auto !important; } di
v.googleafc div.adcount1 strong { font-size:20px !important; line-height:150%; }
div.googleafc div.adcount1 p { font-size:16px !important; line-height:162.5%; m
argin:0.7em 0pt; } div.googleafc div.adcount1 span { font-size:13px !important;
} div.googleafc div.horz div.adcount2 a { width:46%; } div.googleafc div.horz di
v.adcount3 a { width:30%; } div.googleafc div.quad { background:#EAEAEA none rep
eat scroll 0% 0%; border:1px solid #797979; height:auto; margin:0pt 0pt 0.7em; o
verflow:hidden; padding:0pt; } div.googleafc div.quad a { float:left; height:6.3
em; margin:0pt; padding:0pt 0pt 0pt 15px; width:45%; } div.googleafc div.quad st
rong { color:#1619FC; margin-top:0.5em; } div.googleafc div.quad div.adcount1 a
{ height:auto; margin-bottom:1em; } div#searchmain div.googleafc { padding:7px 0
pt; width:500px; } div.googleafc div.adunit span {display:inline;} div.googleafc
div.adunit strong {display:inline;} div.googleafc div.adunit a{display:inline;
padding:0px;margin:0;} div.googleafc div.adunit{display:block;padding:3px 12px 7
px 4px;margin:0;} div.googleafc div.horz div.adunit a{float:none;width:auto;_wid
th:auto;padding:0 0 0 0;} div.googleafc div.horz div.adunit{float:left;width:23%
;_width:23%;padding:0 12px 0 0;} div.googleafc div.adcount1 div.adunit *{text-al
ign:center;} div.googleafc div.adcount1 div.adunit a{float:none;width:auto;paddi
ng:0;} div.googleafc div.adcount1 div.adunit{float:none;width:auto;padding:0 10p
x;} div.googleafc div.horz div.adcount2 div.adunit{width:46%;_width:49%} div.goo
gleafc div.horz div.adcount3 div.adunit{width:30%;_width:31%} div.googleafc div.
horz div.adcount2 div.adunit a{width:auto;_width:auto} div.googleafc div.horz di
v.adcount3 div.adunit a{width:auto;_width:auto} div.googleafc div.quad {float:le
ft;} div.googleafc div.quad div.adunit a{float:none;height:auto;width:auto;_wid
th:auto;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;} div.googleafc div.quad div.adunit{float:left;
height:6.3em;width:45%;_width:47%;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 15px} div.googleafc div
.quad div.adcount1 div.adunit a{height:auto;margin-bottom:0;} div.googleafc div.
quad div.adcount1 a{height:auto;margin-bottom:1em;} div.googleafc div.quad div.a
dcount1 div.adunit {float:none; width:97%; height:auto; padding:0;} div#CMS_Blog
Postpage_Gads_A {border:1px solid #B1D0F0;background-color:white;} dev.googleafc
{overflow:hidden;width:100%;} div.googleafc div.googlehdr {border-bottom:1px so
lid #A5A5A5; color:#000000; margin:0pt 0pt 10px 4px; padding:0pt; text-align:lef
t;} div.googleafc div.vert {background-color:white; border:1px solid #B1D0F0;} d
iv.googleafc strong {color:#003399;} div.googleafc span {color: #008800;} </STY
LE>');
str += ' <DIV class=googleafc> <DIV class=vert> <DIV class=googl
ehdr><a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/request.py?contact=abg_
afc&gl=US&hideleadgen=1" class="spLinks" target="_blank">Sponsored Links</a></DI
V> <DIV class=adcount4 id=gafc> ';
for (l = 0; l < 4; l++)
{
if (google_ads[i] == null) break;
str += ' <div class="adunit"> <A style="width:auto;" on
mouseover="window.status=\'go to ' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '\'; return tru
e;" onmouseout="window.status=\'\';" href="' + google_ads[i].url + '" target=_bl
ank><STRONG>' + google_ads[i].line1 + '</STRONG> </A><br/> <P>' + google_ads[i]
.line2 + ' ' + google_ads[i].line3 + '</P> <A onmouseover="window.status=\'go t
o ' + google_ads[i].visible_url + '\'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=\
'\';" href="' + google_ads[i].url + '" target=_blank><SPAN>' + google_ads[i].vis
ible_url + '</SPAN></A> </div> ';
i++;
}
str += ' </DIV> </div> </div>';
ctl.innerHTML += str;
}
try {
if (!window.MySpace)
{
window.MySpace = new Object();
MySpace.AdditionalPageBeaconKVPs = { ga:"c_na_1_" + goog
le_ads.length};
}
else if (MySpace.AdditionalPageBeaconKVPs)
MySpace.AdditionalPageBeaconKVPs.ga = "c_na_1_" + google
_ads.length ;
else
MySpace.AdditionalPageBeaconKVPs = { ga:"c_na_1_" + goog
le_ads.length};
var gafc = document.getElementById("gafc");
if (gafc == null) return;
gafc.className = gafc.className.replace("adcount4", "adcount" +
google_ads.length);
var googleafc = document.getElementById("googleafc");
if (googleafc == null) return;
googleafc.className = googleafc.className.replace("adcount4", "a
dcount" + google_ads.length);
}
catch (e) {}
try {
if (typeof($q) !== 'undefined') {
var afcNodes = $q('.googleafc div > p');
for (var i=0,len=afcNodes.length; i<len; i++) {
var anchors = $q('a', afcNodes[i].parentNode);
if (anchors.length > 0)
attachLink(afcNodes[i], anchors[0].href)
;
}
var anchorTags = $q('.googleafc a');
for (var i=0,len=anchorTags.length; i<len; i++)
anchorTags[i].onclick = trackGoogleAd;
}
} catch (e) {}
function attachLink(elem, link) {
elem.style.cursor = 'pointer';
elem.onclick = function() {
window.open(link);
trackGoogleAd();
}
}
function trackGoogleAd() {
if (MySpace.Beacon) {
var adData = { eventid:300, clientid:dw_google_ad_client
, l_channelids:dw_google_ad_channel };
if (MySpace.AdditionalPageBeaconKVPs && MySpace.Addition
alPageBeaconKVPs.abtest)
adData.abtest = MySpace.AdditionalPageBeaconKVPs
.abtest;
MySpace.Beacon.Request(adData);
}
}
}
var google_page_url = "http://www.myspace.com/_-_-_super-man_-_-_/blog?page=1&__
preferredculture=en-US&__ipculture=en-US";
var afcxml = "false";
var google_language = "en";
var dw_google_ad_client = "fim_myspace_blogs_js";
var google_ad_client = "fim_myspace_blogs_js";
var google_contents = "";
var google_ed = "0:0:Mzg0MWVjNGU5MmY2NWQwN6J5GOAsLiOFIPuAYIlzdp1HXfVrlfFhpKofdh1
aiQ4RahKY0AvCyfF9FelCLZMqPMyieMndo3RkkaXiBMyHVr28QCKHhgTxSWMnejTYGQBzMcFD4DyK3ck
::0:0:ZGU1ODFhMDA3ZmE4OWQwZQvtBjALJ0IHoaW266aq4iXR3Cw1CexZKLVgxJdjh8_y2ttyb_Ki-X
-LwihgkpQD8vYDaA1TgaWhOVrWMfsY_yje2zpcely-mlYPLox8yZQ3-cGuOdrKvPc";
var google_ad_output = "js";
var google_safe = "high";
var google_ad_type = "text";
var google_ad_channel = "fim_myspace_blogs_view,fim_myspace_united-states";
var google_encoding = "utf8";
var google_adtest = "off";
var google_max_num_ads = 4;
var google_cust_ch = "";
var dw_google_ad_channel = "fim_myspace_blogs_view,fim_myspace_united-states";
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var WebIM = WebIM || {};
WebIM.Config = WebIM.Config || {};
WebIM.Config.WebIMSettingsURL = "http://profileedit.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseac
tion=accountSettings.webIM";
WebIM.Strings = WebIM.Strings || {};
WebIM.Strings.ENABLE_MYSPACEIM = "Enable MySpaceIM";
WebIM.Strings.IMCALL_SETTINGS_LINK = "IM Settings";
WebIM.Strings.CANCEL = "Cancel";
WebIM.Strings.IMCALL_DISABLED_SETTINGS = "You must be Online on MySpaceIM to use
this feature. Go to your IM Settings page and check the box to enable MySpaceIM
.";
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.co
m/pagead/show_ads.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
MySpace.Util.applyWBRToElements(MySpace.Utils.Selector.query('.blogRealN
ame'), {frequency: 10});
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
MySpace.BeaconData={"dsid":"2","dsv":"1","rd":"www.myspace.com","rqs":"p
age=2","refpg":"/_-_-_super-man_-_-_/blog","rpf":"BlogListAll","d":"www.myspace.
com","qs":"friendId=415169779&page=1","pf":"BlogListAll","fa":"","pgnm":"/Module
s/BlogV2/Pages/ViewAllBlogs.aspx","cip":"1165700544","pc":"en-US","pid":"6462043
05706066827","pidf":"0","ABtd":"0","t":"1287410122948","ct":"1287410122948","ci"
:"Woodmere","st":"NY","co":"US","dmac":"501","uff":"0","uatv":"br=Opera 9.80&os=
Windows NT 5.1","sip":"171970886","uid":"415169779","pggd":"14285c2a-930e-4ac2-9
25a-2893df971218","prid":"415169779","ili":"1","at":"1","cfv":"0:0:0","cef":"0",
"sliu":"1","pref":"0","kvp":"bt=1&pidv=2&sn=cha1mwebnet0300&page=%2f_-_-_super-m
an_-_-_%2fblog&"};
MySpace.BeaconAddress="http://b.myspace.com/~myspace/beacon/b.ashx?";
MySpace.Beacon.sn="cha1mwebnet0300";
MySpace.Beacon.ff="f";
if (MySpace.Beacon) MySpace.Beacon.SendPageBeacon();
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
</script>

<script type="text/javascript">MySpace.Application._raiseDOMloaded();</s
cript>
</body>
</html>

You might also like