Discoursecommunity Vidal Draft 2
Discoursecommunity Vidal Draft 2
Abstract
Discourse communities is everywhere around us, one instance could be school, classes
are discourse communities, sport teams, and study groups. For example, all these communities
But these discourse communities, which differ to speech communities, had never been defined.
Until it is understood how his definition works, there will be no difference between communities,
which would make the RWS 1301 class no different than a study group with your classmates.
Because of both groups have the same objectives which is studying content covered in class, but
also have differences such as the language, body language, and times. Applying Swales’s
characteristics to the RWS 1301 proves that it is a discourse community. A discourse community
allows people to learn about certain topic, helps you on finding people with the same interest as
you, and helps you to get knowledge from people who are prepared to teach and explain the best
way possible.
Literature Review
Writing has a pre-determined characteristic (some are: define topic, revise, research, pre-
determine questions) that you need to follow to write a good essay, research paper or whatever
assignment you need to do. But, has no order to follow these characteristics, you can start and try
to follow these characteristics, but you are going to fail at some point, because writing is a hard
process, you need to revise your work every time you write something, to make a better claim, to
look for mistakes, error on mechanics, the idea is not what you meant it, or other corrections you
want to make. At the end is your paper and you have to be confident on your work.
DISCOURSE COMMUNITY 4
Erik Borg (2004), uses an example of a group of people who recognizes the language of
English to differentiate from particular languages, these people read literature readings
to conceive the text, they also share their readings to understand it better. They share possible
ways to read the text and they find the best way to comprehend it more efficiently and faster. We
can say that this people are a discourse community concurring to Borg, because in this course
uses the characteristics Swales give us previously to identify a discourse community. For
example, they share a common goal, they read to understand the language. They
intercommunicate, share their opinions to find different ways to understand it. They use
feedback, likewise the previous point, they answer to each other finding better ways. They use
books as genre, and artifacts they probably use that we do not. They use a lexis that probably
don’t understand like literature. And last, they are a group of people with suitable degree of
Based on Gee’s article, he argues that nobody is a fully member of a single discourse,
they get influenced by other discourses that we are also involved in. A discourse are ways of
being in the world. They are forms of life which integrate acts, beliefs. Is also a sort of identity
key which complete person’s attitudes. The discourse defines people because there is so
much things to learn every day, also people are connected in some way. According to
Gee, discourse is not bodies of knowledge like physics. Therefore, you can learn or teach
In the other hand, Porter (2017) argue that, people need to be original. This is a hard part,
because humans are not original by nature. Humans copy and modify to create, to innovate, but
innovations come from coping other’s idea. People are imperfect by nature, not even close to
world, everybody shares information with others, learn from the people
Porter dispute that giving credit to the people that helped you to get the knowledge is a way to let
the people know who the mentor of your research was. Porter also says that getting the idea of
the article and re-word it with your own words and give credit to greater thinkers that
investigated for you (page number). Writers always need to stand in shoulders of giants. In order
Methods
Research methods used for this project included interviews, surveys and
observations. The information of this research paper was collected through interviews of
secondary sources as Swales (1990), Porter (2004), Gee (?), and Borg (2017). They provided
knowledge to write this research also included surveys to provide examples and give the practice
to memorize points of this topic, for example, Swale’s characteristics. The last method used to do
this research paper was observation. Looking for pictures and finding correlations based on
Discussion
Genre are examples of unique tools used in this discourse community, notes specifically
for RWS and others. The use of specialized vocabulary is important because the vocabulary is
meanings are applied. Hierarchy is used to maintain control of the situations of the
discourse. The objective of graduating from college, and also, we share the common goal of
DISCOURSE COMMUNITY 6
passing the class. Intercommunication -We communicate to each other to share points of view
common goals. For example, we have the goal of passing this class. In this class we practice
One example about intercommunication were when the professor asked questions about
communication is a very important factor when you are in a community, because you share
A discourse community has to be prepared to learn or to try to achieve the goal you have
in the course, an example can be the Power Point you use to teach, books or other materials you
different meanings, but we use specific meanings for the moment or the day. We
always must have a hierarchy in order to maintain the order in the discourse community. In this
discourse have a hierarchy of Students, regular students, then followed by scholars, and then the
professor. All the characteristics that Swales shared to us is to give us an idea of how a discourse
community is described.
Conclusion
The RWS 1301 class is a discourse community, as defined by Swales’s characteristics.
But not only the class, but also many other groups out of school, that share same objectives and
work together to accomplish the goal marked. Differing significantly from speech communities,
DISCOURSE COMMUNITY 7
especially by the existence of common public goals. But in the same way discourse communities
are different for the simple reason of following different languages but keeping the same base.
This research provides the opportunity to examine other groups as to their contributions to
society. Swale’s characteristics can be a valuable tool for examining how communication works
within groups.
DISCOURSE COMMUNITY 8
References
Borg, E. (2003). Discourse community. ELT Journal, 57(4), 398-400.
Gee, J. (1989), Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistic: Introduction. Journal of Education, vol. 171,
no. 1, p. 5-17.
Porter, J. E. (1986), Intertextuality and the Discourse Community. Rhetoric Review, vol 5, no. 1,
Autumn p. 34-47
https://webcourses.ucf.edu/courses/984277/pages/what-is-a-discourse-community.