Problem Solving
Problem Solving
Chapter - 3
2 - Sessions
Agenda 4 - Hours
– Porter’s 5 Forces
– Ishikawa Diagram
– Mind Mapping
– SWOT analysis
• Exercise
Problem Solving
3.1 What is Problem Solving
• An approach about how to proceed from a given state to a desired goal state.
• It is part of larger problem process that includes problem finding & shaping.
• “Problems call forth our courage and our wisdom; indeed, they create our
courage and our wisdom. It is only because of problems that we grow
mentally and spiritually.” - M. Scott Peck
• Considered the most complex of all intellectual functions, problem solving has
been defined as higher-order cognitive process that requires modulation and
control of more routine or fundamental skills (Goldstein & Levin, 1987).
Problem Solving
3.1 What is Problem Solving
• “He who asks a question may be a fool for five minutes, but he who
never asks a question remains a fool forever.” - Tom Connelly
Problem Solving
3.2 Barriers of effective Problem Solving
Barriers:
• Failure to recognize the problem
• Conceiving the problem too narrowly
• Making a hasty choice
• Failure to consider all consequences
• Failure to consider the feasibility of the solution
• Irrelevant information
• Dreaming: problem-solving without waking consciousness
Problem Solving
3.3 Problem Solving Process
“It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems
longer.” - Albert Einstein
2. Generating alternatives.
4. Make a Decision
5. Implementing solutions.
1. List the benefits– how will solving the problem benefit you?
Problem Solving
3.3.1 Defining the problem
Some important factors;
Time required to make the decision
Result of making a good and a bad decision
People who would help you
Who will face the consequences of the decision?
Problem Solving
3.3.2 Generating alternatives
• Situation of making decision arises because of alternatives.
– Brainstorm ideas.
Problem Solving
3.3.3 Evaluating and selecting alternatives
• Brainstorm
• Group-think
Problem Solving
3.3.4 Decision Making
• Choosing the best alternative that can impact success and effectiveness.
– Combine alternatives.
Problem Solving
3.3.4 Decision Making Approach
• Individual
– Individual makes decision based on personal values and preferences.
– Challenging and difficult at times because some people are too dependent
on others for a sound decision.
– A conflict of values and preferences also affects individual decision.
• Authoritarian
– Decision relies on leader or group head.
– Leader must gather sufficient knowledge.
– Not driven by personal choices; must explain the decision to all.
• Group
– Members brainstorm and share ideas, discuss the considerations, to finalise
upon an agreed decision.
– Everyone takes accountability.
– Usually more effective.
Problem Solving
3.3.5 Implementing solutions
• Step 5A: What steps can I take to act on the alternative(s) chosen?
Problem Solving
3.3.6 Reviewing the solution
Problem Solving
3.4 Problem Solving Tools/Models
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats
• Role-playing (Put the hat on, take the hat off, switch hats, signal your thinking)
• Simple, effective parallel thinking process
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats__Advantages
• Improve communication
• Maximize productive collaboration & minimize counterproductive interaction/behaviour
• Consider issues, problems, decisions, and opportunities systematically
• Use Parallel Thinking as a group or team to generate more, better ideas and solutions
• Make meetings much shorter and more productive (Speed up decision making)
• Reduce conflict among team members or meeting participants (Avoid debate)
• Stimulate innovation by generating more and better ideas quickly
• Create dynamic, results oriented meetings that make people want to participate
• Go beyond the obvious to discover effective alternate solutions
• Spot opportunities where others see only problems
• Think clearly and objectively
• View problems from new and unusual angles
• Make thorough evaluations
• See all sides of a situation
• Keep egos and "turf protection" in check (Detaching the Ego)
• Achieve significant and meaningful results in a less time
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats__White Hat Objective
Facts, Figures, Data and Information
Questions:
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats__Red Hat Objective
Feelings, Intuition, Emotions and Hunches
Examples:
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats__Green Hat Objective
Creative Ideas, Alternatives, Suggestions, and Proposals
Questions:
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats__Yellow Hat Objective
Benefits, Feasibility and Optimism
Questions:
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats__Black Hat Objective
Caution, Difficulty, Judgment and Assessment
Questions:
• Is this true?
• Will it work?
Problem Solving
3.4.1 Six Thinking Hats__Blue Hat Objective
Sums up what is learned.
Organization of thinking.
Examples:
Green Further develop the most promising alternatives & make a choice.
Black Point out the weaknesses, problems and dangers in the idea.
Problem Solving
3.4.3 Fishbone Analysis
• Ishikawa, Fishbone, Cause-&-Effect diagram
• Japanese quality control expert Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa, invented to help employees
avoid solutions that merely address the symptoms of a much larger problem
• First find all possible causes for problem; then rate potential causes according
to their level of importance; and diagram a hierarchy.
Problem Solving
3.4.3 Ishikawa Analysis
• Create a backbone for fish (straight line which leads to the head).
• Connect these causes with arrows to the spine (first bones of the fish)
• Continue breaking down each cause until the root causes have been
identified.
Problem Solving
3.4.3 Ishikawa Analysis
5-M models (e.g. manufacturing)
– Method (process)
– Maintenance
Problem Solving
3.4.3 Ishikawa Analysis Example
Problem Solving
3.4.3 Ishikawa Analysis
The 8-P Model (used in product marketing)
– Price
– Promotion
– Place
– Process
– People (personnel)
– Physical evidence
– Performance
Problem Solving
3.4.3 Ishikawa Analysis
– Surroundings
– Suppliers
– Systems
– Skills
Problem Solving
3.4.3 Ishikawa Analysis Example
Problem Solving
3.4.4 Mind Mapping
Problem Solving
3.4.4 Mind Mapping
• Graphical way to represent ideas & concepts. (resembles more closely how brain
actually works)
• Visual thinking tool that helps structuring information, helping to better analyze,
comprehend, synthesize, recall and generate new ideas.
• Since it is an activity that is both analytical and artistic, it engages your brain in a much,
much richer way, helping in all its cognitive functions.
• Visual form of note taking that offers overview of a topic and its complex information,
allowing participants to comprehend, create new ideas and build connections.
– Through the use of colors, images and words, mind mapping encourages one to
begin with a central idea and expand outward to more in-depth sub-topics.
Problem Solving
3.4.4 Mind Mapping
Problem Solving
3.4.4 Mind Mapping _ Steps
1. Start in the middle of a blank page (landscape) with the main idea.
2. Develop the related subtopics around this central topic, connecting each of
them to the centre with a line.
3. Repeat the same process for the subtopics, generating lower-level subtopics
as it fits, connecting each of those to the corresponding subtopic.
• Keep the topics labels as short as possible (single word, even just a picture)
• Vary text size, color and alignment (thickness & length of lines)
• Use key words, images, symbols, codes, and dimensions throughout your mind map.
• Use colors throughout the mind map (for visual stimulation, encoding/grouping).
Problem Solving
3.4.4 Mind Mapping
Problem Solving
3.4.4 Mind Mapping _ Advantages
• Help participant brainstorm and explore any idea, concept, or problem
Problem Solving
3.4.5 SWOT analysis
• Organized list of business aspect
Problem Solving
3.4.5 SWOT analysis _ Example
Problem Solving
3.4.5 SWOT analysis _ Strengths
• Positive attributes, tangible & intangible, internal to organization (within control)
• What other positive, internal aspects add value or offer competitive advantage?
Problem Solving
3.4.5 SWOT analysis _ Weakness
• Internal, Negative factors.
• Aspects of business that detract from the value to offer or place you at a
competitive disadvantage (need to enhance these areas ).
• What factors that are within your control detract from your ability to obtain
or maintain a competitive edge?
• What opportunities exist in your market or the environment that you can
benefit from?
• Has there been recent market growth or have there been other changes in
the market the create an opportunity?
• Is the opportunity ongoing, or is there just a window for it? In other words,
how critical is your timing?
Problem Solving
3.4.5 SWOT analysis _ Threat
• External, Negative factors beyond your control
– could place your strategy/business at risk.
– No control over these.
• Who are your existing or potential competitors?
• What factors beyond your control could place your business at risk?
• Are there challenges created by an unfavourable trend or development that
may lead to deteriorating revenues or profits?
• What situations might threaten your marketing efforts?
• Has there been a significant change in supplier prices or availability of raw
materials?
• What about shifts in consumer behavior, economy, or government
regulations that could reduce your sales?
• Has a new product or technology been introduced that makes your products,
equipment, or services obsolete?
Problem Solving
3.4.6 Porter’s 5 Forces
• Strategic analysts often use Porter’s five forces to understand whether new
products or services are potentially profitable.
Problem Solving
3.4.6 Porter’s 5 Forces
Supplier power- An assessment of how easy it is for suppliers to drive up prices.
– Driven by: number of suppliers of each essential input; uniqueness of their
product or service; relative size and strength of the supplier; and cost of
switching from one supplier to another.
Buyer power- How easy it is for buyers to drive prices down. Driven by:
– number of buyers in the market; importance of each individual buyer to
the organisation; and cost to the buyer of switching from one supplier to
another.
– If business has just few powerful buyers, they are often able to dictate
terms.
Threat of new entry- Profitable markets attract new entrants, which erodes
profitability.
– Unless incumbents have strong and durable barriers to entry, for
example, patents, economies of scale, capital requirements or
government policies, then profitability will decline to a competitive rate.
Regulation, taxation and trade policies make government a sixth force for many
industries.
Problem Solving
Chapter-3 :: Exercise-3 (45 minutes)
• Discussion… 10 min
Problem Solving